Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks

The purpose of this paper is to study proposals to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a tool for Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). We first recall, using a simple model, the equivalence between the concept of ‘efficiency’ in DEA and that of ‘convex efficiency’ in MCDM. Examples are then used to show that various techniques that have been proposed in the DEA literature to deal with MCDM problems violate simple normative properties that are commonly accepted. We conclude with some remarks on the possible areas of interaction between DEA and MCDM.     

A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is the leading technique for measuring the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) on the basis of multiple inputs and multiple outputs. In this technique, the weights for inputs and outputs are estimated in the best advantage for each unit so as to maximize its relative efficiency. But, this flexibility in selecting the weights deters the comparison among DMUs on a common base. For dealing with this difficulty, Kao and Hung (2005) proposed a compromise solution approach for generating common weights under the DEA framework. The proposed multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) model was derived from the original non-linear DEA model. This paper presents an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach by means of introducing an MCDM model which is derived from a new linear DEA model.     

具有偏好锥的面向输出的超效率DEA模型分析

鉴于传统DEA模型无法区分有效决策单元,超效率DEA模型未考虑决策者的偏好,现提出面向输出的权重受限的综合超效率DEA模型及其投影概念,并讨论该模型与其他超效率DEA模型之间的关系.接着,分析模型的最优目标函数值与决策单元有效性之间的关系,并讨论面向输出的权重受限的综合超效投影与多目标规划问题的非支配解之间的关系.最后,通过对中国西部12个地区工业企业科技创新效率综合评价,并与原有方法进行比较研究,得出本文方法更具优势和合理性.     

Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis

This paper explores the consequences of total weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis (DEA) assessments of the efficiency of decision-making units, and it suggests one possible way of limiting such flexibility. It is suggested that total weight flexibility can lead to some decision-making units being assessed, in effect, on only a small subset of their inputs and outputs, while the rest of their inputs and outputs are all but ignored. Constraining the weights in DEA assessments overcomes this problem. The paper suggests one way in which constraints can be placed for the case where the decision-making units to be assessed use only a single input. The method is illustrated using data on local-authority rates departments. Finally, the paper discusses the interpretation and usefulness of the information obtained from DEA assessments involving weights constraints.     

Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-2) are methods for evaluating alternatives based on multiple criteria. While DEA is mainly an ex-post tool used for classifying alternatives into efficient and inefficient ones, SMAA-2 is an ex-ante tool for supporting multiple criteria decision-making. Both methods use a kind of value function where the importance of criteria is modeled using weights. Unlike many other methods, neither DEA nor SMAA-2 requires decision-makers’ weights as input. Instead, these so-called non-parametric methods explore the weight space in order to identify weights favorable for each alternative. This paper introduces the SMAA-D method, which is a combination of DEA and SMAA-2. SMAA-D can be characterized as an extension of DEA to handle uncertain or imprecise data to provide stochastic efficiency measures. Alternatively, the combined method can be seen as a variant of SMAA-2 with a DEA-type value function.     

The explicit role of weight bounds in models of data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we suggest that weight bounds used in models of data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be assessed using production trade-offs between inputs and outputs. This development is based on a transformation of the envelopment DEA model to a special form, which exhibits an explicit link between weight bounds and production trade-offs. This allows us to specify the guidelines to the construction of weight bounds, which ensure that the envelopment form has a clear economic meaning. In this development, the radial efficiency measure retains its standard meaning as a technologically realistic improvement factor. This contrasts with the methods based on value judgements for which this traditional meaning of efficiency becomes void. We show that the exact economic meaning of the same weight bounds depends on the unit under the assessment and the orientation (input-minimization or output-maximization) of the model. The suggested approach is valid under the assumptions of constant and variable returns to scale.     

A multiple criteria ranking method based on game cross-evaluation approach

The application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as an alternative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) tool has been gaining more attentions in the literatures. Doyle (Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 62(1):87?C100, 1995) presents a method of multi-attribute choice based on an application of DEA. In the first part of his method, the straightforward DEA is considered as an idealized process of self-evaluation in which each alternative weighs the attributes in order to maximize its own score (or desirability) relative to the other alternatives. Then, in the second step, each alternative applies its own DEA-derived best weights to each of the other alternatives (i.e., cross-evaluation), then the average of the cross-evaluations that get placed on an alternative is taken as an index of its overall score. In some cases of multiple criteria decision making, direct or indirect competitions exist among the alternatives, while the factor of competition is usually ignored in most of MCDM settings. This paper proposes an approach to evaluate and rank alternatives in MCDM via an extension of DEA method, namely DEA game cross-efficiency model in Liang, Wu, Cook and Zhu (Oper. Res. 56(5):1278?C1288, 2008b), in which each alternative is viewed as a player who seeks to maximize its own score (or desirability), under the condition that the cross-evaluation scores of each of other alternatives does not deteriorate. The game cross-evaluation score is obtained when the alternative??s own maximized scores are averaged. The obtained game cross-evaluation scores are unique and constitute a Nash equilibrium point. Therefore, the results and rankings based upon game cross-evaluation score analysis are more reliable and will benefit the decision makers.     

Demystifying DEA — A Visual Interactive Approach Based on Multiple Criteria Analysis

Both Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Multiple Criteria Analysis (MCA) can be used to assess the efficiency with which units perform similar tasks. This paper describes an approach derived from the integration of data envelopment analysis and a multi-attribute value function. This approach is implemented as a visual interactive decision support system, the use of which is illustrated by a practical application. The authors feel that this approach overcomes some of the limitations of the original DEA approach and, in particular, increases users' understanding of DEA. The approach is particularly well suited to the analysis of the efficiency of a small number of units.     

基于参数设计的信噪比交叉效率评价方法

针对DEA交叉效率评价过程中没有考虑自评与互评效率的作用而主观赋予相同权重导致交叉效率评价值不准确的问题.文章基于参数设计的思想,依据试验设计中可控与不可控因素的作用机理区分自评权重和互评权重对所评价决策单元交叉效率的影响与作用,将其界定为可控与不可控因素的管理学属性,明确不同权重作用机理;引入信噪比作为衡量决策单元交叉效率评价时的性能指标,实施DEA交叉效率评价方法的改进,设计出DEA信噪比交叉效率集结方法,从而实现交叉效率的集结方式由单一考虑交叉效率波动的均值转化为综合考虑交叉效率波动情况(均值与方差),交叉效率评价值用信噪比交叉效率替代交叉效率平均值更具有统计学意义并可从管理学角度解释,评价结果也具有更高的可区分性;最后通过算例分析验证了交叉效率评价理论上的必要性和该方法的合理性与可行性,同时发现了交叉效率评价中存在CCR有效DMU序位超出了有效DMU范围现象,建议应实施同质DMU检验和评价值归一化.文章的研究也为提高DEA交叉效率测算的准确性提供一种新思路.     

Congestion analysis in DEA inputs under weight restrictions

Data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is used to determine the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU), is able to recognize the amount of input congestion. Moreover, the relative importance of inputs and outputs can be incorporated into DEA models by weight restrictions. These restrictions or a priori weights are introduced by the decision maker and lead to changes in models and efficiency interpretation. In this paper, we present an approach to determine the value of congestion in inputs under the weight restrictions. Some discussions show how weight restrictions can affect the congestion amount.     

Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis

In this paper we suggest two equivalent ways in which the information about production trade-offs between the inputs and outputs can be incorporated into the models of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Firstly, this can be implemented by modifying envelopment DEA models. Secondly, the same information can be captured using weight restrictions in multiplier DEA models. Unlike other methods used for the assessment of weight restrictions, for example those based on value judgements or monetary considerations, the trade-off approach developed in this paper ensures that the radial target of any inefficient unit is technologically realistic and, therefore, the efficiency measure retains its traditional meaning of the extreme radial improvement factor. In other words, this paper suggests that ‘technology thinking’ could be used instead of ‘value thinking’ in the construction of weight restrictions, which offers real practical advantages. The method is equally applicable to the models under constant and variable returns-to-scale assumptions.     

Weight-restricted DEA in action: from expert opinions to mathematical models

A common problem in real-world DEA applications is that all inputs and outputs may not be equally relevant to the organizations analysed and their stakeholders. In many cases, one is also faced with a data set where the decision-making units do not clearly outnumber the quantity of inputs and outputs. This study reports an application where DEA embellished with weight restrictions is used to analyse the efficiency of public organizations to overcome the above-mentioned problems. Whereas there are numerous documented applications of weight-restricted DEA in the literature, the process of defining the actual weight restrictions is seldom described. However, that part — defining the actual weights restrictions based on price, preference or value information — is the most difficult step involved in using the weight-restricted DEA. Comparing various weight restriction schemes with real data suggests that the ability to consider and include preference information in DEA adds important insights into the analysis.     

Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis

It has been widely recognized that data envelopment analysis (DEA) lacks discrimination power to distinguish between DEA efficient units. This paper proposes a new methodology for ranking decision making units (DMUs). The new methodology ranks DMUs by imposing an appropriate minimum weight restriction on all inputs and outputs, which is decided by a decision maker (DM) or an assessor in terms of the solutions to a series of linear programming (LP) models that are specially constructed to determine a maximin weight for each DEA efficient unit. The DM can decide how many DMUs to be retained as DEA efficient in final efficiency ranking according to the requirement of real applications, which provides flexibility for DEA ranking. Three numerical examples are investigated using the proposed ranking methodology to illustrate its power in discriminating between DMUs, particularly DEA efficient units.     

用超效率综合DEA模型来研究DEA有效性

对超效率综合DEA模型,有三个定理来判断其不可行性,其中一个定理基于加性模型来判断,并证明:当模型不可行时被评决策单元的扩展DEA有效性,由此给出了对扩展DEA有效的决策单元排序的方法,此外,对不含非阿基米德无穷小的基于输入(输出)的超效率综合DEA模型,当其最优值为1时,有一个定理来判断被评单元的DEA有效性.     

Validating absolute weight bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models

The Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (CCR) DEA model and its linear forms maximise the efficiency of the assessed decision making unit (DMU) and, at the same time, the ratio of this efficiency to the maximum efficiency taken across all the DMUs, the latter naturally always being equal to one. It has been shown recently that, in the presence of absolute weight bounds, these models may not maximise the ratio of these efficiencies, a fact that may cause problems with the interpretation and use of the optimal primal and dual solutions. For example, an inefficient DMU may have greater efficiency than its target unit for some weights. This paper investigates the problem in greater detail; it shows that, in the linear DEA model maximising the total virtual output of the assessed DMU, the problem occurs only if upper bounds are imposed on the output weights. A similar result is established for the model that minimises the total virtual input.     

聚类分析在确定广义DEA方法样本单元集中的应用

利用基于BC~2模型的只有输出的DEA模型(D-BC_O~2)来评价决策单元的有效性时,得到的效率值有时会与定性分析存在一定的差异.为了解决这类问题,引入只有产出的广义DEA模型(DG-BC_O~2),并利用聚类分析方法确定样本单元集,给出(DG_(cluster)模型来评价决策单元的有效性.最后通过2009年中国各省市人均经济发展数据进行演示,说明利用聚类分析方法确定样本单元集具有一定的可行性.     

Multiobjective data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is popularly used to evaluate relative efficiency among public or private firms. Most DEA models are established by individually maximizing each firm's efficiency according to its advantageous expectation by a ratio. Some scholars have pointed out the interesting relationship between the multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problem and the DEA problem. They also introduced the common weight approach to DEA based on MOLP. This paper proposes a new linear programming problem for computing the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU). The proposed model differs from traditional and existing multiobjective DEA models in that its objective function is the difference between inputs and outputs instead of the outputs/inputs ratio. Then an MOLP problem, based on the introduced linear programming problem, is formulated for the computation of common weights for all DMUs. To be precise, the modified Chebychev distance and the ideal point of MOLP are used to generate common weights. The dual problem of this model is also investigated. Finally, this study presents an actual case study analysing R&D efficiency of 10 TFT-LCD companies in Taiwan to illustrate this new approach. Our model demonstrates better performance than the traditional DEA model as well as some of the most important existing multiobjective DEA models.     

A generalized model for weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is designed to maximize the efficiency of a given decision-making unit (DMU) relative to all other DMUs by the choice of a set of input and output weights. One strength of the original models is the absence of any need of a priori information about the process of transforming inputs into outputs. However, in the practical application of DEA models, this strength has also become a weakness. Incorporation of process knowledge is more a norm than an exception in practice, and typically involves placing constraints on the input and/or output weights. New DEA formulations have evolved to address this issue. However, existing formulations for weight restrictions may underestimate relative efficiency or even render a problem infeasible. A new model formulation is introduced to address this issue. This formulation represents a significant improvement over existing DEA models by providing a generalized, comprehensive treatment for weight restrictions.     

基于SMAA和公共权重的决策单元效率评价与排序

在数据包络分析(DEA)中,公共权重模型是决策单元效率评价与排序的常用方法之一。与传统DEA模型相比,公共权重模型用一组公共的投入产出权重评价所有决策单元,评价结果往往更具有区分度且更为客观。本文考虑决策单元对排序位置的满意程度,提出了基于最大化最小满意度和最大化平均满意度两类新的公共权重模型。首先,基于随机多准则可接受度分析(SMAA)方法,计算出每个决策单元处于各个排名位置的可接受度;然后,通过逆权重空间分析,分别求得使最小满意度和平均满意度最大化的一组公共权重;最后,利用所求的公共权重,计算各决策单元的效率值及相应的排序。算例分析验证了本文提出的基于SMAA的公共权重模型用于决策单元效率评价与排序的可行性。     

On the Use of Ordinal Data in Data Envelopment Analysis

In many problems involving efficiency analysis using DEA, certain factors may be measurable only on an ordinal scale. Specifically, it may be possible only to rank order the DMUs according to a factor, rather than being able to assign a specific numerical value of that factor to each DMU. To illustrate this, we examine a problem involving the evaluation of new technology installations. The presence of qualitative factors in such an environment motivates the need to investigate how such factors can be incorporated into existing efficiency measurement models. In particular, a procedure is presented for incorporating an ordinal factor into the DEA structure, with the resulting formulation being a particular form of cone ratio model. The model is then applied to the technology installation efficiency problem.