Strongly J-Clean Matrices Over Local Rings

An element of a ring is called strongly J-clean provided that it can be written as the sum of an idempotent and an element in its Jacobson radical that commute. We investigate, in this article, a single strongly J-clean 2 × 2 matrix over a noncommutative local ring. The criteria on strong J-cleanness of 2 × 2 matrices in terms of a quadratic equation are given. These extend the corresponding results in [8 Li , B. ( 2009 ). Strongly clean matrix rings over noncommutative local rings . Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 46 : 71 – 78 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], Theorems 2.7 and 3.2], [9 Li , Y. ( 2007 ). Strongly clean matrix rings over local rings . J. Algebra 312 : 397 – 404 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], Theorem 2.6], and [11 Yang , X. , Zhou , Y. ( 2008 ). Strongly cleanness of the 2 × 2 matrix ring over a general local ring . J. Algebra 320 : 2280 – 2290 .[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], Theorem 7].     

A Class of Quasipolar Rings

An element a of a ring R is called J-quasipolar if there exists p ² = p ∈ R satisfying p ∈ comm²(a) and a + p ∈ J(R); R is called J-quasipolar in case each of its elements is J-quasipolar. The class of this sort of rings lies properly between the class of uniquely clean rings and the class of quasipolar rings. In particular, every J-quasipolar element in a ring is quasipolar. It is shown, in this paper, that a ring R is J-quasipolar iff R/J(R) is boolean and R is quasipolar. For a local ring R, we prove that every n × n upper triangular matrix ring over R is J-quasipolar iff R is uniquely bleached and R/J(R) ? ?₂. Moreover, it is proved that any matrix ring of size greater than 1 is never J-quasipolar. Consequently, we determine when a 2 × 2 matrix over a commutative local ring is J-quasipolar. A criterion in terms of solvability of the characteristic equation is obtained for such a matrix to be J-quasipolar.     

Orders in regular rings with minimal condition for principal right ideals

ABSTRACT

A ring R is called an n-clean (resp. Σ-clean) ring if every element in R is n-clean (resp. Σ-clean). Clean rings are 1-clean and hence are Σ-clean. An example shows that there exists a 2-clean ring that is not clean. This shows that Σ-clean rings are a proper generalization of clean rings. The group ring ?_(p) G with G a cyclic group of order 3 is proved to be Σ-clean. The m× m matrix ring M _m (R) over an n-clean ring is n-clean, and the m×m (m>1) matrix ring M _m (R) over any ring is Σ-clean. Additionally, rings satisfying a weakly unit 1-stable range were introduced. Rings satisfying weakly unit 1-stable range are left-right symmetric and are generalizations of abelian π-regular rings, abelian clean rings, and rings satisfying unit 1-stable range. A ring R satisfies a weakly unit 1-stable range if and only if whenever a ₁ R + ˙˙˙ a _m R = dR, with m ≥ 2, a ₁,…, a _m, d ∈ R, there exist u ₁ ∈ U(R) and u ₂,…, u _m ∈ W(R) such that a ₁ u ₁ + ? a _m u _m = Rd.     

S-Noetherian Properties of Composite Ring Extensions

Let R be a commutative ring with identity and S a multiplicative subset of R. We say that R is an S-Noetherian ring if for each ideal I of R, there exist an s ∈ S and a finitely generated ideal J of R such that sI ? J ? I. In this article, we study transfers of S-Noetherian property to the composite semigroup ring and the composite generalized power series ring.     

When is a 2 × 2 Matrix Ring Over a Commutative Local Ring Quasipolar?

A ring R is quasipolar if for any a ∈ R, there exists p ² = p ∈ R such that p ∈ comm²(a), p + a ∈ U(R) and ap ∈ R ^qnil . In this article, we determine when a 2 × 2 matrix over a commutative local ring is quasipolar. A criterion in terms of solvability of the characteristic equation is obtained for such a matrix to be quasipolar. Consequently, we obtain several equivalent conditions for the 2 × 2 matrix ring over a commutative local ring to be quasipolar. Furthermore, it is shown that the 2 × 2 matrix ring over the ring of p-adic integers is quasipolar.     

Condensed Rings with Zero-Divisors #

A commutative ring R with identity is condensed (respectively strongly condensed) if for each pair of ideals I, J of R, IJ = {ij | i ∈ I, j ∈ J} (resp., IJ = iJ for some i ∈ I or IJ = Ij for some j ∈ J). In a similar fashion we can define regularly condensed and regularly strongly condensed rings by restricting I and J to be regular ideals. We show that an arbitrary product of rings is condensed if and only if each factor is so, and that R[X] is condensed if and only if R is von Neumann regular. A number of results known in the domain case are extended to the ring case. Regularly strongly condensed and one-dimensional regularly condensed Noetherian rings are characterized.     

Quasipolar Property of Generalized Matrix Rings

The article concerns the question of when a generalized matrix ring K _s (R) over a local ring R is quasipolar. For a commutative local ring R, it is proved that K _s (R) is quasipolar if and only if it is strongly clean. For a general local ring R, some partial answers to the question are obtained. There exist noncommutative local rings R such that K _s (R) is strongly clean, but not quasipolar. Necessary and sufficient conditions for a single matrix of K _s (R) (where R is a commutative local ring) to be quasipolar is obtained. The known results on this subject in [5 Cui , J. , Chen , J. ( 2011 ). When is a 2 × 2 matrix ring over a commutative local ring quasipolar? Comm. Alg. 39 : 3212 – 3221 .[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]] are improved or extended.     

Regular Action in Rings

Let R be a ring with identity, X(R) the set of all nonzero non-units of R and G(R) the group of all units of R. By considering left and right regular actions of G(R) on X(R), the following are investigated: (1) For a local ring R such that X(R) is a union of n distinct orbits under the left (or right) regular action of G(R) on X(R), if J ⁿ  ≠ 0 = J ⁿ⁺¹ where J is the Jacobson radical of R, then the set of all the distinct ideals of R is exactly {R, J, J ²,…, J ⁿ , 0}, and each orbit under the left regular action is equal to the one under the right regular action. (2) Such a ring R is left (and right) duo ring. (3) For the full matrix ring S of n × n matrices over a commutative ring R, the number of orbits under left regular action of G(S) on X(S) is equal to the number of orbits under right regular action of G(S) on X(S); the result also holds for the ring of n × n upper triangular matrices over R.     

A Generalization of Divided Domains and Its Connection to Weak Baer Going-Down Rings

Many results on going-down domains and divided domains are generalized to the context of rings with von Neumann regular total quotient rings. A (commutative unital) ring R is called regular divided if each P ∈ Spec(R)?(Max(R) ∩ Min(R)) is comparable with each principal regular ideal of R. Among rings having von Neumann regular total quotient rings, the regular divided rings are the pullbacks K× _K/P D where K is von Neumann regular, P ∈ Spec(K) and D is a divided domain. Any regular divided ring (for instance, regular comparable ring) with a von Neumann regular total quotient ring is a weak Baer going-down ring. If R is a weak Baer going-down ring and T is an extension ring with a von Neumann regular total quotient ring such that no regular element of R becomes a zero-divisor in T, then R ? T satisfies going-down. If R is a weak Baer ring and P ∈ Spec(R), then R + PR _(P) is a going-down ring if and only if R/P and R _P are going-down rings. The weak Baer going-down rings R such that Spec(R)?Min(R) has a unique maximal element are characterized in terms of the existence of suitable regular divided overrings.     

A Note on Strongly Clean Matrix Rings

Let R be an associative ring with identity. An element a ∈ R is called strongly clean if a = e + u with e ² = e ∈ R, u a unit of R, and eu = ue. A ring R is called strongly clean if every element of R is strongly clean. Strongly clean rings were introduced by Nicholson [7 Nicholson , W. K. ( 1999 ). Strongly clean rings and Fitting's lemma . Comm. Algebra 27 : 3583 – 3592 .[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. It is unknown yet when a matrix ring over a strongly clean ring is strongly clean. Several articles discussed this topic when R is local or strongly π-regular. In this note, necessary conditions for the matrix ring 𝕄 _n (R) (n > 1) over an arbitrary ring R to be strongly clean are given, and the strongly clean property of 𝕄₂(RC ₂) over the group ring RC ₂ with R local is obtained.     

On Generalizations of Prime Ideals

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. Let φ: S(R) → S(R) ∪ {?} be a function, where S(R) is the set of ideals of R. Suppose n ≥ 2 is a positive integer. A nonzero proper ideal I of R is called (n ? 1, n) ? φ-prime if, whenever a ₁, a ₂, ?, a _n  ∈ R and a ₁ a ₂?a _n  ∈ I?φ(I), the product of (n ? 1) of the a _i 's is in I. In this article, we study (n ? 1, n) ? φ-prime ideals (n ≥ 2). A number of results concerning (n ? 1, n) ? φ-prime ideals and examples of (n ? 1, n) ? φ-prime ideals are also given. Finally, rings with the property that for some φ, every proper ideal is (n ? 1, n) ? φ-prime, are characterized.     

Indecomposable Modules and Gelfand Rings

It is proved that a commutative ring is clean if and only if it is Gelfand with a totally disconnected maximal spectrum. It is shown that each indecomposable module over a commutative ring R satisfies a finite condition if and only if R _P is an Artinian valuation ring for each maximal prime ideal P. Commutative rings for which each indecomposable module has a local endomorphism ring are studied. These rings are clean and elementary divisor rings. It is shown that each commutative ring R with a Hausdorff and totally disconnected maximal spectrum is local-global. Moreover, if R is arithmetic, then R is an elementary divisor ring.     

Strong Cleanness of Matrix Rings Over Commutative Rings

Let R be a commutative local ring. It is proved that R is Henselian if and only if each R-algebra which is a direct limit of module finite R-algebras is strongly clean. So, the matrix ring 𝕄 _n (R) is strongly clean for each integer n > 0 if R is Henselian and we show that the converse holds if either the residue class field of R is algebraically closed or R is an integrally closed domain or R is a valuation ring. It is also shown that each R-algebra which is locally a direct limit of module-finite algebras, is strongly clean if R is a π-regular commutative ring.     

On Strongly Clean Matrix and Triangular Matrix Rings

A ring R with identity is called “clean” if every element of R is the sum of an idempotent and a unit, and R is called “strongly clean” if every element of R is the sum of an idempotent and a unit that commute. Strongly clean rings are “additive analogs” of strongly regular rings, where a ring R is strongly regular if every element of R is the product of an idempotent and a unit that commute. Strongly clean rings were introduced in Nicholson (1999 Nicholson , W. K. (1999). Strongly clean rings and Fitting's lemma. Comm. Algebra 27:3583–3592. [CSA] [Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) where their connection with strongly π-regular rings and hence to Fitting's Lemma were discussed. Local rings and strongly π-regular rings are all strongly clean. In this article, we identify new families of strongly clean rings through matrix rings and triangular matrix rings. For instance, it is proven that the 2 × 2 matrix ring over the ring of p-adic integers and the triangular matrix ring over a commutative semiperfect ring are all strongly clean.     

On Rings Whose Elements are the Sum of a Unit and a Root of a Fixed Polynomial

A ring R with identity is called “clean” if for every element a ? R there exist an idempotent e and a unit u in R such that a = e + u. Let C(R) denote the center of a ring R and g(x) be a polynomial in the polynomial ring C(R)[x]. An element r ? R is called “g(x)-clean” if r = s + u where g(s) = 0 and u is a unit of R and R is g(x)-clean if every element is g(x)-clean. Clean rings are g(x)-clean where g(x) ? (x ? a)(x ? b)C(R)[x] with a, b ? C(R) and b ? a ? U(R); equivalent conditions for (x² ? 2x)-clean rings are obtained; and some properties of g(x)-clean rings are given.     

Universal Lying-Over Rings

A (commutative unital) ring R is said to satisfy universal lying-over (ULO) if each injective ring homomorphism R → T satisfies the lying-over property. If R satisfies ULO, then R = tq(R), the total quotient ring of R. If a reduced ring satisfies ULO, it also satisfies Property A. If a ring R = tq(R) satisfies Property A and each nonminimal prime ideal of R is an intersection of maximal ideals, R satisfies ULO. If 0 ≤ n ≤ ∞, there exists a reduced (resp., nonreduced) n-dimensional ring satisfying ULO. The A + B construction is used to show that if 2 ≤ n < ∞, there exists an n-dimensional reduced ring R such that R = tq(R), R satisfies Property A, but R does not satisfy ULO.     

Strongly Duo Modules and Rings

An R-module M is called strongly duo if Tr(N, M) = N for every N ≤ M _R . Several equivalent conditions to being strongly duo are given. If M _R is strongly duo and reduced, then End _R (M) is a strongly regular ring and the converse is true when R is a Dedekind domain and M _R is torsion. Over certain rings, nonsingular strongly duo modules are precisely regular duo modules. If R is a Dedekind domain, then M _R is strongly duo if and only if either M ≈ R or M _R is torsion and duo. Over a commutative ring, strongly duo modules are precisely pq-injective duo modules and every projective strongly duo module is a multiplication module. A ring R is called right strongly duo if R _R is strongly duo. Strongly regular rings are precisely reduced (right) strongly duo rings. A ring R is Noetherian and all of its factor rings are right strongly duo if and only if R is a serial Artinian right duo ring.     

On Generalizations of Prime Ideals (II)

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. We say that a proper ideal P of R is (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime (n ≥ 2) if 0 ≠ a ₁…a _n  ∈ P implies a ₁…a _i?1 a _i+1…a _n  ∈ P for some i ∈ {1,…, n}, where a ₁,…, a _n  ∈ R. In this article, we study (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals. A number of results concerning (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals and examples of (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals are given. Rings with the property that for a positive integer n such that 2 ≤ n ≤ 5, every proper ideal is (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime are characterized. Moreover, it is shown that in some rings, nonzero (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals and (n ? 1, n)-prime ideals coincide.     

Presimplifiable and Cyclic Group Rings

Let R be any commutative ring with identity, and let C be a (finite or infinite) cyclic group. We show that the group ring R(C) is presimplifiable if and only if its augmentation ideal I(C) is presimplifiable. We conjecture that the group rings R(C _n ) are presimplifiable if and only if n = p ^m , p ∈ J(R), p is prime, and R is presimplifiable. We show the necessity of n = p ^m , and we prove the sufficiency when n = 2, 3, 4. These results were made possible by a new formula derived herein for the circulant determinantal coefficients.