Note on Star Operations Over Polynomial Rings

This article studies the notions of star and semistar operations over a polynomial ring. It aims at characterizing when every upper to zero in R[X] is a *-maximal ideal and when a *-maximal ideal Q of R[X] is extended from R, that is, Q = (Q ∩ R)[X] with Q ∩ R ≠0, for a given star operation of finite character * on R[X]. We also answer negatively some questions raised by Anderson–Clarke by constructing a Prüfer domain R for which the v-operation is not stable.     

The Bar-Radical of a Class of Almost Alternative Baric Algebras

In this article we prove that, if (U, ω) is a finite dimensional baric algebra of (γ, δ) type over a field F of characteristic ≠ 2,3,5 such that γ² ? δ² + δ = 1 and δ ≠ 0,1, then rad(U) = R(U) ∩ (bar(U))², where R(U) is the nilradical (maximal nil ideal) of U.     

Separativity of Regular Rings in Which 2 Is Invertible

A regular ring R is separative provided that for all finitely generated projective right R-modules A and B, A⊕ A? A⊕ B? A⊕ B implies that A? B. We prove, in this article, that a regular ring R in which 2 is invertible is separative if and only if each a ∈ R satisfying R(1 ? a ²)R = Rr(a) = ?(a)R and i(End _R (aR)) = ∞ is unit-regular if and only if each a ∈ R satisfying R(1 ? a ²)R ∩ RaR = Rr(a) ∩ ?(a)R ∩ RaR and i(End _R (aR)) = ∞ is unit-regular. Further equivalent characterizations of such regular rings are also obtained.     

On the FIP Property for Extensions of Commutative Rings

ABSTRACT

A (unital) extension R ? T of (commutative) rings is said to have FIP (respectively be a minimal extension) if there are only finitely many (respectively no) rings S such that R ? S ? T. Transfer results for the FIP property for extensions of Nagata rings are obtained, including the following fact: if R ? T is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension, then R(X)?T(X) also is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension. The assertion obtained by replacing “is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension” with “has FIP” is valid if R is an infinite field but invalid if R is a finite field. A generalization of the Primitive Element Theorem is obtained by characterizing, for any field (more generally, any artinian reduced ring) R, the ring extensions R ? T which have FIP; and, if R is any field K, by describing all possible structures of the (necessarily minimal) ring extensions appearing in any maximal chain of intermediate rings between K and any such T. Transfer of the FIP and “minimal extension” properties is given for certain pullbacks, with applications to constructions such as CPI-extensions. Various sufficient conditions are given for a ring extension of the form R ? R[u], with u a nilpotent element, to have or not have FIP. One such result states that if R is a residually finite integral domain that is not a field and u is a nilpotent element belonging to some ring extension of R, then R ? R[u] has FIP if and only if (0 : u) ≠ 0. The rings R having only finitely many unital subrings are studied, with complete characterizations being obtained in the following cases: char(R)>0; R an integral domain of characteristic 0; and R a (module-)finite extension of ? which is not an integral domain. In particular, a ring of the last-mentioned type has only finitely many unital subrings if and only if (?:R)≠0. Some results are also given for the residually FIP property.     

AA-Rings

Abstract

Let R be a ring with identity such that R ⁺, the additive group of R, is torsion-free of finite rank (tffr). The ring R is called an E-ring if End(R ⁺) = {x ? ax : a ∈ R} and is called an A-ring if Aut(R ⁺) = {x ? ux : u ∈ U(R)}, where U(R) is the group of units of R. While E-rings have been studied for decades, the notion of A-rings was introduced only recently. We now introduce a weaker notion. The ring R, 1 ∈ R, is called an AA-ring if for each α ∈ Aut(R ⁺) there is some natural number n such that α ⁿ  ∈ {x ? ux : u ∈ U(R)}. We will find all tffr AA-rings with nilradical N(R) ≠ {0} and show that all tffr AA-rings with N(R) = {0} are actually E-rings. As a consequence of our results on AA-rings, we are able to prove that all tffr A-rings are indeed E-rings.     

Examples of Generic Lattice Ideals of Codimension 3

A commutative ring R is said to be strongly Hopfian if the chain of annihilators ann(a) ? ann(a ²) ? … stabilizes for each a ∈ R. In this article, we are interested in the class of strongly Hopfian rings and the transfer of this property from a commutative ring R to the ring of the power series R[[X]]. We provide an example of a strongly Hopfian ring R such that R[[X]] is not strongly Hopfian. We give some necessary and sufficient conditions for R[[X]] to be strongly Hopfian.     

Symplectic algebras and poisson algebras

Abstract

A ring R is called left P-injective if for every a ∈ R, aR = r(l(a)) where l( ? ) and r( ? ) denote left and right annihilators respectively. The ring R is called left GP-injective if for any 0 ≠ a ∈ R, there exists n > 0 such that a ⁿ  ≠ 0 and a ⁿ R = r(l(a ⁿ )). As a response to an open question on GP -injective rings, an example of a left GP-injective ring which is not left P-injective is given. It is also proved here that a ring R is left FP -injective if and only if every matrix ring 𝕄 _n (R) is left GP-injective.     

Regular Action in Rings

Let R be a ring with identity, X(R) the set of all nonzero non-units of R and G(R) the group of all units of R. By considering left and right regular actions of G(R) on X(R), the following are investigated: (1) For a local ring R such that X(R) is a union of n distinct orbits under the left (or right) regular action of G(R) on X(R), if J ⁿ  ≠ 0 = J ⁿ⁺¹ where J is the Jacobson radical of R, then the set of all the distinct ideals of R is exactly {R, J, J ²,…, J ⁿ , 0}, and each orbit under the left regular action is equal to the one under the right regular action. (2) Such a ring R is left (and right) duo ring. (3) For the full matrix ring S of n × n matrices over a commutative ring R, the number of orbits under left regular action of G(S) on X(S) is equal to the number of orbits under right regular action of G(S) on X(S); the result also holds for the ring of n × n upper triangular matrices over R.     

Numerical Semigroup Rings and Almost Prüfer v-Multiplication Domains

Let D be an integral domain with quotient field K, X be an indeterminate over D, Γ be a numerical semigroup with Γ ? ?₀, D[Γ] be the semigroup ring of Γ over D (and hence D ? D[Γ] ? D[X]), and D + X ⁿ K[X] = {a + X ⁿ g∣a ∈ D and g ∈ K[X]}. We show that there exists an order-preserving bijection between Spec(D[X]) and Spec(D[Γ]), which also preserves t-ideals. We also prove that D[Γ] is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain) if and only if D[X] is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain) and char(D) ≠ 0. We show that if n ≥ 2, then D is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain, AGGCD-domain, AP-domain, AB-domain) and char(D) ≠ 0 if and only if D + X ⁿ K[X] is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain, AGGCD-domain, AP-domain, AB-domain). Finally, we give some examples of APvMDs which are not AGCD-domains by using the constructions D[Γ] and D + X ⁿ K[X].     

Varieties of strange plane curves

Abstract

Let A be a commutative ring with identity, let X, Y be indeterminates and let F(X,Y), G(X, Y) ∈ A[X, Y] be homogeneous. Then the pair F(X, Y), G(X, Y) is said to be radical preserving with respect to A if Rad((F(x, y), G(x, y))R) = Rad((x,y)R) for each A-algebra R and each pair of elements x, y in R. It is shown that infinite sequences of pairwise radical preserving polynomials can be obtained by homogenizing cyclotomic polynomials, and that under suitable conditions on a ?-graded ring A these can be used to produce an infinite set of homogeneous prime ideals between two given homogeneous prime ideals P ? Q of A such that ht(Q/P) = 2.     

Crossed products and blocks with normal defect groups

Abstract

Let D be an integral domain. A multiplicative set S of D is an almost splitting set if for each 0 ≠ d ∈ D, there exists an n = n(d) with d ⁿ  = st where s ∈ S and t is v-coprime to each element of S. An integral domain D is an almost GCD (AGCD) domain if for every x, y ∈ D, there exists a positive integer n = n(x, y) such that x ⁿ D ∩ y ⁿ D is a principal ideal. We prove that the polynomial ring D[X] is an AGCD domain if and only if D is an AGCD domain and D[X] ? D′[X] is a root extension, where D′ is the integral closure of D. We also show that D + XD _S [X] is an AGCD domain if and only if D and D _S [X] are AGCD domains and S is an almost splitting set.     

Mod-Retractable Rings

A right module M over a ring R is said to be retractable if Hom _R (M, N) ≠ 0 for each nonzero submodule N of M. We show that M ? _R RG is a retractable RG-module if and only if M _R is retractable for every finite group G. The ring R is (finitely) mod-retractable if every (finitely generated) right R-module is retractable. Some comparisons between max rings, semiartinian rings, perfect rings, noetherian rings, nonsingular rings, and mod-retractable rings are investigated. In particular, we prove ring-theoretical criteria of right mod-retractability for classes of all commutative, left perfect, and right noetherian rings.     

A commutativity and finiteness condition for rings

We prove that if a ring R has the property that XY = YX for all infinite subsets X and Y, then R is either finite or commutative.     

Minimal But Inefficient Presentations for Self Semidirect Products of the Free Abelian Monoid on Two Generators

Let R be a ring and M(R) the set consisting of zero and primitive idempotents of R. We study the rings R for which M(R) is multiplicative. It is proved that if R has a complete finite set of primitive orthogonal idempotents, then R is a finite direct product of connected rings precisely when M(R) is multiplicative. We prove that if R is a (von Neumann) regular ring with M(R) multiplicative, then every primitive idempotent in R is central. It is also shown that this does not happen even in semihereditary and semiregular rings. Let R be an arbitrary ring with M(R) multiplicative and e ∈ R be a primitive idempotent, then for every unit u ∈ R, it is proved that eue is a unit in eRe. We also prove that if M(R) is multiplicative, then two primitive idempotents e and f in R are conjugates, i.e., f = ueu ^?1 for some u ∈ U(R), if and only if ef ≠ 0.     

On Isolated Submodules

Let R be a ring with identity and let M be a unital left R-module. A proper submodule L of M is radical if L is an intersection of prime submodules of M. Moreover, a submodule L of M is isolated if, for each proper submodule N of L, there exists a prime submodule K of M such that N ? K but L ? K. It is proved that every proper submodule of M is radical (and hence every submodule of M is isolated) if and only if N ∩ IM = IN for every submodule N of M and every (left primitive) ideal I of R. In case, R/P is an Artinian ring for every left primitive ideal P of R it is proved that a finitely generated submodule N of a nonzero left R-module M is isolated if and only if PN = N ∩ PM for every left primitive ideal P of R. If R is a commutative ring, then a finitely generated submodule N of a projective R-module M is isolated if and only if N is a direct summand of M.     

A Note on t-SFT-rings

We define a nonzero ideal A of an integral domain R to be a t-SFT-ideal if there exist a finitely generated ideal B ? A and a positive integer k such that a ^k  ? B _v for each a ? A _t , and a domain R to be a t-SFT-ring if each nonzero ideal of R is a t-SFT-ideal. This article presents a number of basic properties and stability results for t-SFT-rings. We show that an integral domain R is a Krull domain if and only if R is a completely integrally closed t-SFT-ring; for an integrally closed domain R, R is a t-SFT-ring if and only if R[X] is a t-SFT-ring; if R is a t-SFT-domain, then t ? dim R[[X]] ≥ t ? dim R. We also give an example of a t-SFT Prüfer v-multiplication domain R such that t ? dim R[[X]] > t ? dim R.     

Smarandache Vertices of the Graphs Associated to the Commutative Rings

Let R be a commutative ring with identity 1 ≠ 0. A nonzero element a in R is said to be a Smarandache zero-divisor if there exist three different nonzero elements x, y, and b (≠ a) in R such that ax = ab = by = 0, but xy ≠ 0. We will generalize this notion to the Smarandache vertex of an arbitrary simple graph and characterize the Smarandache zero-divisors of commutative rings (resp. with respect to an ideal) via their associated zero-divisor graphs. We illustrate them with examples and prove some interesting results about them.     

Group homomorphisms inducing isomorphisms in cohomology

In this article, we call a ring R right generalized semiregular if for any a ∈ R there exist two left ideals P, L of R such that lr(a) = P⊕ L, where P ? Ra and Ra ∩ L is small in R. The class of generalized semiregular rings contains all semiregular rings and all AP-injective rings. Some properties of these rings are studied and some results about semiregular rings and AP-injective rings are extended. In addition, we call a ring R semi-π-regular if for any a ∈ R there exist a positive integer n and e ² = e ∈ a ⁿ R such that (1 ? e)a ⁿ  ∈ J(R), the Jacobson radical of R. It is shown that a ring R is semi-π-regular if and only if R/J(R) is π-regular and idempotents can be lifted modulo J(R).     

Strongly Clean Property and Stable Range One of Some Rings

Let R be an associative ring with identity. An element a ∈ R is called clean if a = e + u with e an idempotent and u a unit of R, and a is called strongly clean if, in addition, eu = ue. A ring R is clean if every element of R is clean, and R is strongly clean if every element of R is strongly clean. When is a matrix ring over a strongly clean ring strongly clean? Does a strongly clean ring have stable range one? For these open questions, we prove that 𝕄 _n (C(X)) is strongly π-regular (hence, strongly clean) where C(X) is the ring of all real valued continuous functions on X with X a P-space; C(X) is clean iff it has stable range one; and a unital C*-algebra in which every unit element is self-adjoint is clean iff it has stable range one. The criteria for the ring of complex valued continuous functions C(X,?) to be strongly clean is given.     

When R(X) and R⟨X⟩ are Clean: A Constructive Treatment

For R a commutative ring, we give constructive proofs that R(X) is clean exactly when R is clean, and that R ? X ? is clean exactly when R is zero dimensional. We also give a constructive proof of the known result that R(X) = R ? X ? exactly when R is zero dimensional. By a constructive proof we mean one that is carried out within the context of intuitionistic logic. In practice, this means that the arguments are arithmetic rather than ideal theoretic.