Re-study of Nucleon Pole Contribution in J/

[1]V.D.Burkert,Phys.Lett.B 72 (1997) 109. [2]S.Capstick and W.Roberts,Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.45 (2000) S241,and references therein. [3]B.S.Zou,Nucl.Phys.A 675 (2000) 167c; B.S.Zou,Nucl.Phys.A 684 (2001) 330; BES Collaboration (J.Z.Bai,et al.) Phys.Lett.B 510 (2001) 75; BES Collaboration (M.Ablikim,et al.),hep-ex/0405030. [4]R.Sinha and Susumu Okubo,Phys.Rev.D 30 (1984)2333. [5]W.H.Liang,P.N.Shen,B.S.Zou,and A.Faessler,Euro.Phys.J A 21 (2004) 487. [6]Particle Data Group,Euro.Phys.J.C 15 (2000) 1. [7]K.Tsushima,A.Sibrtsev,and A.W.Thomas,Phys.Lett.B 390 (1997) 29. [8]J.Kogut,Rev.Mod.Phys.51 (1979) 659; Rev.Mod.Phys.55 (1983) 775. [9]Q.Haider and L.C.Liu,J.Phys.G 22 (1996) 1187; L.C.Liu and W.X.Ma,J.Phys.G 26 (2000) L59. [10]V.G.J.Stoks,R.A.M.Klomp,C.P.F.Terheggen,and J.J.de Swart,Phys.Rev.C 49 (1994) 2950. [11]H.Haberzettl,C.Bennhold,T.Mart,and T.Feuster,Phys.Rev.C 58 (1998) R40. [12]Y.Oh,A.I.Titov,and T.-S.H.Lee,Phys.Rev.C 63(2001) 25201.     

Shape Coexistence for 179Hg in Relativistic Mean-Field Theory

[1]J.H. Hamilton,A. VRamayya, W.T. Pinkston, et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 239. [2]R. Julin, K. Helariutta, and M. Muikku, J. Phys. G 27(2001) R109. [3]J.H. Hamilton, Nukleonika 24 (1979) 561. [4]W.C. Ma, et al., Phys. Lett. B 139 (1984) 276. [5]R. Bengtsson, et al., Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987) 1. [6]S. Yoshida and N. Takigawa, Phys. Rev. C 55 (1996)1255. [7]T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, P. Ring, et al., Phys. Rev. C 65(2002) 054320. [8]F.G. Condev, M.P. Carpenter, R.V.F. Janssens, et al.,Phys. Lett. B 528 (2002) 221. [9]D.G. Jenkins, A.N. Andreyev, R.D. Page, et al., Phys.Rev. C 66 (2002) 011301(R). [10]B.D. Serot and J.D. Walecka, Adv. Nuc]. Phys. 16 (1986)1. [11]P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37 (1996) 193. [12]J. Meng and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3963. [13]J. Meng and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 460. [14]S.K. Patra, S. Yoshida, N. Takigawa, and C.R. Praharaj,Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) 1924. [15]S. Yoshida, S.K. Patra, N. Takigawa, and C.R. Praharaj,Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) 1938. [16]G.A. Lalazissis and P. Ring, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998)225. [17]Jun-Qing Li, Zhong-Yu Ma, Bao-Qiu Chen, and Yong Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 064305. [18]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 565 (1993) 1. [19]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 595 (1995)409. [20]G. Audi and A.H. Wapstra, Nucl. Phys. A 624 (1997) 1. [21]P. MOller and J.R. Nix, Atom. Data and Nucl. Data Table 59 (1995) 307.     

Sigma Terms and Strangeness Contents of Baryon Octet in Modified Chiral Perturbation Theory

[1]J.Gasser,H.Leutwyler,and M.E.Sainio,Phys.Lett.B 253 (1991) 252. [2]John Ellis,Eur.Phys.J.A 24S2 (2005) 3,[arXive:hepph/0411369]. [3]T.Inoue,V.E.Lyubovitskij,Th.Gutsche,and Amand Faessler,Phys.Rev.C 69 (2004) 035207,[arXive:hepph/0311275]. [4]M.M.Pavan,I.I.Strakovsky,R.L.Workman,and R.A.Arndt,PiN Newslett.16 (2002) 110,[arXive:hepph/0111066]. [5]V.E.Lyubovitskij,Th.Gutsche,Amand Faessler,and E.G.Drukarev,Phys.Rev.D 63 (2001) 054026,[arXive:hep-ph/0009341]. [6]S.D.Bass,Phys.Lett.B 329 (1994) 358,[arXive:hepph/9404294]. [7]Marc Knecht,PiN Newslett.15 (1999) 108,[arXive:hepph/9912443]. [8]P.Schweitzer,Phys.Rev.D 69 (2004) 034003. [9]B.C.Lehnhart,J.Gegelia,and S.Scherer,J.Phys.G 31(2005) 89,[arXive:hep-ph/0412092]. [10]P.J.Ellis and K.Torikoshi,Phys.Rev.C 61 (1999)015205. [11]Gerald E.Hite,William B.Kaufmann,and Richard J.Jacob,Phys.Rev.C 71 (2005) 065201. [12]S.Weinberg,Physica A 96 (1979) 327. [13]J.Gasser and H.Leutwyler,Nucl.Phys.B 250 (1985)465. [14]J.Gasser,M.E.Sainio,and A.Svarc,Nucl.Phys.B 307(1988) 779. [15]P.Papazoglou,D.Zschiesche,S.Schramm,J.SchaffnerBielich,H.St(o)cker,and W.Greiner,Phys.Rev.C 59(1999) 411. [16]T.Fuchs and J.Gegelia,Phys.Rev.D 68 (2003) 056005.     

Top Quark Flavor Changing Decay t

[1]R. Casalbuoani, A. Deandrea, and M. Oertel, JHEP 032(2004) 0402. [2]G. Hooft, In Search of the Ultimate Building Blocks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997). [3]J. Belazey, Searches for New Physics at Hadron Coliders,Northern Illinois University (2005). [4]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, and H. Georgi, Phys. Lett.B 513 (2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239]. [5]I. Low, W. Skiba, and D. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002)072001 [hep-ph/0207243]. [6]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz, and A.E. Nelson,JHEP 0207 (2002) 304 [hep-ph/0206021]. [7]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, E. Katz, A.E. Nelson, T.Gregoire, and J. G. Wacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 021 [hepph/0206020]. [8]T. Gregoire and J.G. Wacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 019[hep-ph/0206023]. [9]For a recent review, see e.g., M. Schmaltz, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 117 (2003) 40. [10]N. Arkani-hamed, A.G. Cohen, T. Gregoire, and J.G.Jacker, JHEP 0208 (2002) 020 [hep-ph/0202089]. [11]or a recent review, see e.g., M. Schmaltz, Nucl. Phys.Proc. Suppl. 117 (2003) 40 [hep-ph/0210415]. [12]E. Katz, J. Lee, A.E. Nelson, and D.G. Walker, hepph/0312287. [13]M. Beneke, I. Efthymiopoulos, M.L. Mangano, et al., hepph/0003033. [14]D.O. Carlson and C.-P. Yuan, hep-ph/9211289. [15]R. Frey, D. Gerdes, and J. Jaros, hep-ph/9704243. [16]G. Eilam, J.L. Hewett, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 44(1991) 1473; W.S. Hou, Phys. Lett. B 296 (1992) 179; K.Agashe and M. Graesser, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 4445;M. Hosch, K. Whisnant, and B.L. Young, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 5725. [17]C.S. Li, R.J. Oakes, and J.M. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 49(1994) 293, Erratum-ibid. D 56 (1997) 3156; G. Couture,C. Hamzaoui, and H. Koenig, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995)1713; G. Couture, M. Frank, and H. Koenig, Phys. Rev.D 56 (1997) 4213; G.M. de Divitiis, et al., Nucl. Phys. B 504 (1997) 45. [18]B. Mele, S. Petrarca, and A. Soddu, Phys. Lett. B 435(1998) 401. [19]B. Mele, hep-ph/0003064. [20]J.M. Yang and C.S. Li, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3412,Erratum, ibid. D 51 (1995) 3974; J.G. Inglada, hepph/9906517. [21]L.R. Xing, W.G. Ma, R.Y. Zhang, Y.B. Sun, and H.S.Hou, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 41 (2004)241. [22]L.R. Xing, W.G. Ma, R.Y. Zhang, Y.B. Sun, and H.S.Hou, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 40 (2003)171. [23]T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath, and L.T. Wang, Phys.Rev. D 67 (2003) 095004. [24]I. Low, W. Skiba, and D. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002)072001. [25]T. Han, H.E. Logan, B. McElrath, and L.T. Wang, hepph/0302188. [26]A.J. Buras, A. Poschenrieder, and S. Uhlig, hepph/0410309. [27]S. Eidelman, et al., Phys. Lett. B 592 (2004) 1. [28]F. Legerlehner, DESY 01-029, hep-ph/0105283.     

Pair-Breaking Critical Current Density of Two-Band Superconductor MgB2

[1]J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagava, T. Muranaka, Y. Zenitani,and J. Akimitsu, Nature 410 (2001) 63. [2]C. Buzea and T. Yamashita, Supercond. Sci. Techn. 14(2001) R115. [3]S. Budko, G. Lapertot, C. Petrovic, C.E. Gunningham, N.Anderson, and P.C. Canfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001)1877. [4]H. Kotegawa, K. Ishida, Y. Kitaoka, T. Muranaka, and J. Akimitsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 127001. [5]J. Kortus, I.I. Mazin, K.D. Belashchenko, V.P. Antropov,and L.L. Boyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 4656. [6]A. Liu, I.I. Mazin, and J. Kortus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(2001) 087005. [7]X.K. Chen, M.J. Konstantinovich, J.C. Irwin, D.D.Lawrie, and J.P. Frank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001)157002. [8]H. Giublio, D. Roditchev, W. Sacks, R. Lamy, D.X.Thanh, J. Kleins, S. Miraglia, D. Fruchart, J. Markus,and P. Monod, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 177008. [9]F. Bouquet, R.A. Fisher, N.E. Phillips, D.G. Hinks, and J.D. Jorgensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 04700. [10]S.V. Shulga, S.-L. Drechsler, H. Echrig, H. Rosner, and W. Pickett, Cond-mat/0103154 (2001). [11]A.A. Golubov, J. Kortus, O.V. Dolgov, O. Jepsen, Y.Kong, O.K. Andersen, B.J. Gibson, K. Ahn, and R.K.Kremer, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 (2002) 1353. [12]H. Doh, M. Sigrist, B.K. Chao, and Sung-Ik Lee, Phys.Rev. Lett. 85 (1999) 5350. [13]I.N. Askerzade, N. Guclu, and A. Gencer, Supercond. Sci.Techn. 15 (2002) L13. [14]I.N. Askerzade, N. Guclu, A. Gencer, and A. Kiliq, Supercond. Sci. Techn. 15 (2002) L17. [15]I.N. Askerzade and A. Gencer, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71(2002) 1637. [16]I.N. Askerzade, Physica C 397 (2003) 99. [17]V.V. Anshukova, B.M. Bulychev, A.I. Golovashkin, L.I.Ivanova, A.A. Minakov, and A.P. Rusakov, Phys. Solid State 45 (2003) 1207. [18]A.A. Abrikosov, Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals,North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988). [19]M.N. Kunchur, S.I. Lee, and W.N. Kang, Phys. Rev. B 68 (2003) 064516.     

基于六粒子纠缠态和Bell态测量的量子信息分离

通过介绍六粒子纠缠态的新应用研究,提出了一个二粒子任意态的信息分离方案.在这个方案中,发送者Alice、控制者Charlie和接受者Bob共享一个六粒子纠缠态,发送者先执行两次Bell基测量|然后控制者执行一次Bell基测量|最后接受者根据发送者和控制者的测量结果,对自己拥有的粒子做适当的幺正变换,从而能够重建要发送的二粒子任意态.这个信息分离方案是决定性的,即成功概率为100%.与使用相同的量子信道进行二粒子任意态的信息分离方案相比,本文提出的方案只需要进行Bell基测量而不需要执行多粒子的联合测量,从而使得这个方案更简单、更容易,并且在目前的实验室技术条件下是能够实现的.     

Dynamics of Two-Photon Lasers with

[1]C.O.Weiss and R.Vilaseca,Dynamics of Lasers,VCH,Weinheim (1991); Instabilities and Chaos in Quantum Optics,eds.F.T.Arecchi and R.G.Harrison,Springer-Verlag,Berlin (1987). [2]H.Haken,Phys.Lett.A 53 (1975) 77. [3]Ju Rui,Huang Hong-Bin,Yang Peng,Xie Xia,and Zhao Huan,Commun.Theor.Phys.(Beijing,China) 44 (2005) 65; Ju Rui,Zhang Ya-Jun,Huang Hong-Bin,and Zhao Huan,Acta Phys.Sin.53 (2004) 2191 (in Chinese). [4]C.Z.Ning and H.Haken,Z.Phys.B 77 (1989) 247; B 77 (1989) 157; B 77 (1989) 163; J.Zakrenwski and M.Lewenstein,Phys.Rev.A 45 (1992) 2057. [5]G.J.deValearcel,E.Roldan,and R.Vilaseca,Phys.Rev.A 45 (1992) R2674; Phys.Rev.A 49 (1994) 1243. [6]X.Xie,H.B.Huang,F.Qian,Y.J.Zhang,P.Yang,and G.X.Qi,Commun.Theor.Phys.(Beijing,China) 46 (2006) 1042. [7]X.L.Deng,H.Q.Ma,B.D.Chen,and H.B.Huang,Phys.Lett.A 290 (2001) 77. [8]C.Benkert,and M.O.Scully,Phys.Rev.A 42 (1990) 2817. [9]M.O.Scully and M.S.Zubairy,Quantum Optics,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge (1997).     

Study of Strange Quark Mass in CFL Phase

[1]M.Alford,K.Rajagopal,and F.Wilczek,Phys.Lett.B 422 (1998) 247; Nucl.Phys.B 537 (1999) 443. [2]M.Gyulassy and L.McLerran,arXiv:nucl-th/0405013;E.V.Shuryak,arXiv:hep-ph/0405066. [3]K.Rajagopal and F.Wilczek,hep-ph/0011333. [4]M.Alford,Chris Kouvaris,and K.Rajagopal,hepph/0406137. [5]Y.Nambu and G.Jona-Lasinio,Phys.Rev.122 (1961)345. [6]R.T.Cahill and C.D.Roberts,Phys.Rev.D 32 (1985)2419. [7]R.T.Cahill and Susan M.Ganner,hep-ph/9812491. [8]A.W.Steiner,S.Reddy,and M.Prakash,Phys.Rev.D 66 (2002) 094007. [9]P.Amore,M.C.Birse,J.A.McGovern,and N.R.Walet,Phys.Rev.D 65 (2002) 074005. [10]M.Alford and K.Rajagopal,JHEP 0206 (2002) 031. [11]Xiao-Fu Li,Yu-Xin Liu,Hong-Shi Zong,and En-GuangZhao,Phys.Rev.C 58 (1998) 1195. [12]H.Reinhardt,Phys.Lett.B 244 (1990) 2. [13]Steven Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields,Vol.2,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge (1996) p.348.     

Generalized statistical complexity measures: Geometrical and analytical properties

We discuss bounds on the values adopted by the generalized statistical complexity measures [M.T. Martin et al., Phys. Lett. A 311 (2003) 126; P.W. Lamberti et al., Physica A 334 (2004) 119] introduced by López Ruiz et al. [Phys. Lett. A 209 (1995) 321] and Shiner et al. [Phys. Rev. E 59 (1999) 1459]. Several new theorems are proved and illustrated with reference to the celebrated logistic map.     

Nonlinear diffusion of indirect excitons in an ideal bilayer with an in-plane harmonic trap

The nonlinear diffusion of the spatially indirect excitons in an ideal bilayer with an in-plane harmonic trap is investigated based on the theories developed by Ivanov [A.L. Ivanov, Europhys. Lett. 59 (2002) 586; A.L. Ivanov, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 (2004) S3629] and Rapaport et al. [R. Rapaport, G. Chen, S. Simon, O. Mitrofanov, L. Pfeiffer, P.M. Platzman, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 075428]. A nonlinear equation for the diffusion of the indirect excitons in this structure is established. The two-dimensional density of the indirect excitons in this structure is calculated. The calculations show that the density adjacent to the trap center for different exciton temperatures can remain very high even long after the photo-excitation because of the confinement of the in-plane harmonic trap, and that the indirect excitons gather several tens of μm away from the trap center. The calculations are in good agreement qualitatively with the experimental results of Voros et al. [Z. Voros, D.W. Snoke, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 016803] and prove that an in-plane harmonic trap can indeed keep an exciton gas dense near its center.     

Quantum secure direct communication based on order rearrangement of single photons

We present an improvement of the protocol proposed by Lucamarini and Mancini [M. Lucamarini, S. Mancini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 140501] with techniques used in the protocol presented by Zhu et al. [A.D. Zhu, Y. Xia, Q.B. Fan, S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 022338], namely the secret transmitting order of particles.     

Quantum entanglement formation by repeated spin blockade measurements in a spin field-effect transistor structure embedded with quantum dots

We propose a method of operating a quantum state machine made of stacked quantum dots buried in adjacent to the channel of a spin field-effect transistor (FET) [S. Datta, B. Das, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (1990) 665; K. Yoh, et al., Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Physics of Semiconductors (ICPS) 2004; H. Ohno, K. Yoh et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 (2003) L87; K. Yoh, J. Konda, S. Shiina, N. Nishiguchi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1997) 4134]. In this method, a spin blockade measurement extracts the quantum state of a nearest quantum dot through Coulomb blockade [K. Yoh, J. Konda, S. Shiina, N. Nishiguchi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1997) 4134; K. Yoh, H. Kazama, Physica E 7 (2000) 440] of the adjacent channel conductance. Repeated quantum Zeno-like (QZ) measurements [H. Nakazato, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 060401] of the spin blockade is shown to purify the quantum dot states within several repetitions. The growth constraints of the stacked InAs quantum dots are shown to provide an exchange interaction energy in the range of 0.01–1 meV [S. Itoh, et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38 (1999) L917; A. Tackeuchi, et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 (2003) 4278]. We have verified that one can reach the fidelity of 90% by repeating the measurement twice, and that of 99.9% by repeating only eleven QZ measurements. Entangled states with two and three vertically stacked dots are achieved with the sampling frequency of the order of 100 MHz.     

Mixing,ergodicity and slow relaxation phenomena

Investigations on diffusion in systems with memory [I.V.L. Costa, R. Morgado, M.V.B.T. Lima, F.A. Oliveira, Europhys. Lett. 63 (2003) 173] have established a hierarchical connection between mixing, ergodicity, and the fluctuation–dissipation theorem (FDT). This hierarchy means that ergodicity is a necessary condition for the validity of the FDT, and mixing is a necessary condition for ergodicity. In this work, we compare those results with recent investigations using the Lee recurrence relations method [M.H. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 26 (1982) 2547; M.H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 250601; M.H. Lee, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 4651]. Lee shows that ergodicity is violated in the dynamics of the electron gas [M.H. Lee, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 4651]. This reinforces both works and implies that the results of [I.V.L. Costa, R. Morgado, M.V.B.T. Lima, F.A. Oliveira, Europhys. Lett. 63 (2003) 173] are more general than the framework in which they were obtained. Some applications to slow relaxation phenomena are discussed.     

Perturbative analysis of possible failures in the traditional adiabatic conditions

The breakdown of adiabatic approximation, demonstrated by Marzlin and Sanders [K.-P. Marzlin, B.C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 160408] and Tong et al. [D.M. Tong, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 110407] for time-evolving “inverse” systems, is traced to the appearance of some nonzero terms in a perturbational treatment and is related to two time scales in the “inverse” systems' Hamiltonian. New adiabatic conditions of Ye et al. [M.-Y. Ye, et al., quant-ph/0509083] can restore the theoretical consistency.     

Comment on breakup densities of hot nuclei

In [V.E. Viola et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 132701, D.S. Bracken et al., Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 034612] the observed decrease in spectral peak energies of IMFs emitted from hot nuclei was interpreted in terms of a breakup density that decreased with increasing excitation energy. Subsequently, Raduta et al. [Ad. Raduta et al., Phys. Lett. B 623 (2005) 43] performed MMM simulations that showed decreasing spectral peaks could be obtained at constant density. In this Letter we point out that this apparent inconsistency is due to a selective comparison of theory and data that overlooks the evolution of the fragment multiplicities as a function of excitation energy.     

A unified model for Sierpinski networks with scale-free scaling and small-world effect

In this paper, we propose an evolving Sierpinski gasket, based on which we establish a model of evolutionary Sierpinski networks (ESNs) that unifies deterministic Sierpinski network [Z.Z. Zhang, S.G. Zhou, T. Zou, L.C. Chen, J.H. Guan, Eur. Phys. J. B 60 (2007) 259] and random Sierpinski network [Z.Z. Zhang, S.G. Zhou, Z. Su, T. Zou, J.H. Guan, Eur. Phys. J. B 65 (2008) 141] to the same framework. We suggest an iterative algorithm generating the ESNs. On the basis of the algorithm, some relevant properties of presented networks are calculated or predicted analytically. Analytical solution shows that the networks under consideration follow a power-law degree distribution, with the distribution exponent continuously tuned in a wide range. The obtained accurate expression of clustering coefficient, together with the prediction of average path length reveals that the ESNs possess small-world effect. All our theoretical results are successfully contrasted by numerical simulations. Moreover, the evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game is also studied on some limitations of the ESNs, i.e., deterministic Sierpinski network and random Sierpinski network.     

Economical phase-covariant cloning with multiclones

This paper presents a very simple method to derive the explicit transformations of the optimal economical 1 to M phase-covariant cloning. The fidelity of clones reaches the theoretic bound [D'Ariano G M and Macchiavello C 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 042306]. The derived transformations cover the previous contributions [Delgado Y, Lamata L et al, 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett.98 150502] in which M must be odd.     

Bouncing branes

We investigate (4+1)- and (5+0)-dimensional gravity coupled to a non-compact scalar field sigma-model in the context of a single-brane-world scenario with separable metric and a bulk fluid. We briefly discuss the standard cosmological solutions and the family of warp factors (which includes both the original Randall–Sundrum [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370, hep-ph/9905221; Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690, hep-th/9906064] solution and the solution of Kachru, Schulz and Silverstein [H.A. Chamblin, H.S. Reall, Nucl. Phys. B 562 (1999) 133, hep-th/9903225; S. Kachru, M. Schulz, E. Silverstein, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 045021, hep-th/0001206]) for the case of a rolling fifth radius [C. Kennedy, E.M. Prodanov, Phys. Lett. B 488 (2000) 11, hep-th/0003299]. We show how this model can be adjusted so that it describes the standard cosmology on a self-tuning domain wall (with static fifth radius) [C. Kennedy, E.M. Prodanov, hep-th/0010202] and we discuss the solutions. Searching for a possible relation to the negative Euclidean stress energy, appearing in the Giddings and Strominger's axion induced topology change in quantum gravity and string theory [S.B. Giddings, A. Strominger, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 890], we modify the non-compact sigma-model into a single-field model (with a rolling fifth radius, separable metric, and no bulk fluid) for the more general case of a brane with non-zero curvature parameter. We find a solution (with a Kachru–Schulz–Silverstein warp factor [Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 045021, hep-th/0001206]), representing a Tolman wormhole for a brane with Lorentz metric and for a brane with positive definite metric.     

Casimir interaction of dielectric gratings

We derive an exact solution for the Casimir force between two arbitrary periodic dielectric gratings and illustrate our method by applying it to two nanostructured silicon gratings. We also reproduce the Casimir force gradient measured recently [H. B. Chan, Y. Bao, J. Zou, R. A. Cirelli, F. Klemens, W. M. Mansfield, and C. S. Pai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 030401 (2008)10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.030401] between a silicon grating and a gold sphere taking into account the material dependence of the force. We find good agreement between our theoretical results and the measured values both in absolute force values and the ratios between the exact force and proximity force approximation predictions.     

Nanoscale oscillatory fracture propagation in metallic glasses

We describe the oscillatory crack propagation for small propagation velocities at the atomistic scale that was recently observed for brittle metallic glasses [G. Wang, Y.T. Wang, Y.H. Liu, M.X. Pan, D.Q. Zhao, W.H. Wang, Appl. Lett. 89 (2006) 121909; G. Wang, D.Q. Zhao, H.Y. Bai, M.X. Pan, A.L. Xia, B.S. Han, X.K. Xi, Y. Wu, W.H. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 235501]. Based on a simple model of crack propagation [Y. Braiman, T. Egami, Phys. Rev. E, 77 (2008) 065101(R)], we derived and analyzed expressions for the feature size, oscillation period, and maximum strain accumulated in the material.