瓜环与含羟基功能基二胺包结配合物的晶体结构及相互作用的研究

合成并表征了含羟基功能基的二胺1,3-二(2-氨基苯氧基)-2-丙醇(客体). 利用X射线衍射方法研究了客体与八元瓜环Q[8]所形成包结配合物的晶体结构. 结果表明主客体间形成了1∶2的包结配合物, 两个客体分子分别从瓜环的两个端口进入瓜环内腔, 在腔内两个客体分子中的苯环间存在着π-π相互作用. 利用1H NMR技术及紫外-可见吸收光谱对主客体间的相互作用进行考察, 所得结果与晶体结构吻合.     

七元瓜环与1,7-二(2-苯并咪唑)庚烷的相互作用及自组装

利用~1H NMR法、紫外吸收光谱法、荧光发射光谱法和单晶X射线衍射等方法考察了七元瓜环(Q[7])与氯化1,7-二(2-苯并咪唑)庚烷(SBHt)在酸性溶液中的相互作用过程及组装模式.首先考察了主客体相互作用对客体p Ka的影响,以确定研究主客体相互作用以及组装过程的实验条件.~1H NMR滴定实验结果表明,在水溶液中主客体可形成1∶1和2∶1的主客体包结配合物,当主客体物质的量之比为1∶1时,Q[7]包结SBHt的烷基链,两端苯并咪唑基团处于瓜环端口外侧;当主客体物质的量之比为2∶1时,两个Q[7]分别包结同一SBHt分子的两端苯并咪唑基团,这一实验结果得到荧光发射光谱的佐证.Q[7]与SBHt形成1∶1的主客体包结配合物的晶体结构表明,客体烷基链在瓜环空腔内发生折叠以使其通过离子偶极及氢键与Q[7]有效作用.     

七、八元瓜环与3-氨基香豆素的主客体相互作用

利用紫外-可见吸收光谱法、荧光光谱法、等温量热滴定法和核磁共振波谱法考察了七、八元瓜环(Q[7]、Q[8])与3-氨基香豆素(3-AC)之间的主客体相互作用。结果表明Q[7]与3-AC在pH=1.03的条件下形成包结比为1∶1的主客体配合物,紫外-可见吸收光谱和荧光吸收光谱测得的主客体包结稳定常数分别为3.789×10~4 L·mol~(-1)、4.136×10~4 L·mol~(-1);Q[8]与3-AC在pH=1.03～6.97条件下均形成包结比为1∶1的主客体配合物,在中性条件下,紫外-可见吸收光谱和荧光吸收光谱测得的主客体包结稳定常数分别为2.551×10~5 L·mol~(-1)、2.455×10~5 L·mol~(-1)。其包结模式为3-氨基香豆素分子完全进入Q[7]或Q[8]分子空腔,主客体相互作用过程主要由焓和熵驱动。相溶解度法研究表明Q[7]、Q[8]的介入使3-AC在水中的溶解度分别增加了1.26倍和2.04倍。     

七元瓜环与N,N’-二烷基-1,3-(4,4’-二吡啶基)丙烷衍生物的相互作用

以1,3-(4,4’-二吡啶基)丙烷为母体, 合成了N,N’-二乙基、二丁基、二己基以及二辛基1,3-(4,4’-二吡啶基)丙烷衍生物. 利用1H NMR技术和紫外吸收光谱法, 考察了Q[7]与上述链状吡啶衍生物的相互作用. 实验结果表明, Q[7]与客体PC0, PC2作用, 瓜环包结客体的二吡啶基丙烷部分形成1∶1的包结配合物; 对于取代烷基碳链数大于4的N,N’-二烷基-1,3-(4,4’-二吡啶基)丙烷衍生物, 随着主体与客体摩尔比值的增加, 体系中主-客体相互作用的主导模式是Q[7]逐渐包结了客体二吡啶基丙烷部分, 进而形成Q[7]包结客体两端取代烷基, 甚至形成一个客体分子上“挂满”3个主体瓜环的包结物.     

七元瓜环与N,N′-二烷基-1,3-(4,4′-二吡啶基)丙烷衍生物的相互作用

以1,3-(4,4′-二吡啶基)丙烷为母体,合成了N,N′-二乙基\,二丁基\,二己基以及二辛基1,3-(4,4′-二吡啶基)丙烷衍生物.利用 1H NMR技术和紫外吸收光谱法,考察了Q[7]与上述链状吡啶衍生物的相互作用.实验结果表明,Q[7]与客体PC0,PC2作用,瓜环包结客体的二吡啶基丙烷部分形成1∶1的包结配合物;对于取代烷基碳链数大于4的N,N′-二烷基-1,3-(4,4′-二吡啶基)丙烷衍生物,随着主体与客体摩尔比值的增加,体系中主-客体相互作用的主导模式是Q[7]逐渐包结了客体二吡啶基丙烷部分,进而形成Q[7]包结客体两端取代烷基,甚至形成一个客体分子上"挂满"3个主体瓜环的包结物.     

六、七、八元瓜环与苯胺系列衍生物的相互作用

利用紫外吸收光谱、荧光光谱以及¹H NMR方法详细考察了六、七、八元瓜环(Q[6], Q[7], Q[8])与苯胺系列衍生物客体的相互作用和体系pH对其作用的影响. 实验结果表明, 3种瓜环与苯胺系列衍生物客体的相互作用强弱、作用比例以及作用模式与体系的酸度密切相关: 在“高”或“低”pH条件下, 未观察到瓜环与这些客体的明显作用; 在介于“高”与“较高”或“低”与“较低”的pH范围, 瓜环与这些客体发生相互作用, 形成1∶1的包结配合物; 而在介于“较高”与“较低”的pH范围, 瓜环与这些客体发生相互作用, 可形成1∶2的包结配合物. 对于不同的瓜环-客体作用体系, 相应的pH范围各不相同. 本文利用简便的实验方法, 测试了这些pH值及其范围. 根据测定的结果, 结合瓜环以及客体的结构特征, 对体系主客体在不同的酸度区域表现出的不同作用模式进行了探讨.     

水溶性六元瓜环衍生物与1,ω-亚烷基吡啶主客体配合物的^1HNMR及晶体结构

利用^1HNMR技术以及单晶X衍射技术考察对称四甲基取代六元瓜环（TMeQ[6]）与几种1,ω-亚烷基吡啶阳离子（ω=2,4,6,8,10）客体的相互作用．在这些包结配合物中,TMeQ[6]的端口效应以及空腔效应同时存在,其主客体作用模式随着客体亚烷基碳链长短不一而各不相同．对于客体1,2-二乙基吡啶（Edpy）,TMeQ[6]包结Edpy的带正电荷的吡啶环部分,形成一不对称的包结配合物;对于客体1,4-二丁基吡啶（Bdpy）,TMeQ[6]选择性包结Bdpy的吡啶环部分或烷基部分存在竞争作用和快速交换;而具有较长碳链的客体1,6-二己基吡啶（Hdpy）和1,8-二丁庚基吡啶（Odpy）与TMeQ[6]通过空腔的疏水作用以及外部的离子-偶极作用形成稳定的类轮烷包结配合物;客体1,10-二癸基吡啶（Ddpy）的两个吡啶环分别被两个TMeQ[6]包结形成哑铃型的包结配合物．     

水溶性六元瓜环衍生物与1,ω-亚烷基吡啶主客体配合物的~1H NMR及晶体结构

利用1HNMR技术以及单晶X衍射技术考察对称四甲基取代六元瓜环(TMeQ[6])与几种1,ω-亚烷基吡啶阳离子(ω=2,4,6,8,10)客体的相互作用.在这些包结配合物中,TMeQ[6]的端口效应以及空腔效应同时存在,其主客体作用模式随着客体亚烷基碳链长短不一而各不相同.对于客体1,2-二乙基吡啶(Edpy),TMeQ[6]包结Edpy的带正电荷的吡啶环部分,形成一不对称的包结配合物;对于客体1,4-二丁基吡啶(Bdpy),TMeQ[6]选择性包结Bdpy的吡啶环部分或烷基部分存在竞争作用和快速交换;而具有较长碳链的客体1,6-二己基吡啶(Hdpy)和1,8-二丁庚基吡啶(Odpy)与TMeQ[6]通过空腔的疏水作用以及外部的离子-偶极作用形成稳定的类轮烷包结配合物;客体1,10-二癸基吡啶(Ddpy)的两个吡啶环分别被两个TMeQ[6]包结形成哑铃型的包结配合物.     

六、七元瓜环与苯二胺及硝基苯胺异构体相互作用的HPLC研究

利用HPLC法考察了六、七元瓜环(Q[6], Q[7])与邻苯二胺(g1)、间苯二胺(g2)、对苯二胺(g3)、邻硝基苯胺(g4)、间硝基苯胺(g5)、对硝基苯胺(g6)的相互作用. 实验结果表明: Q[6]可与客体g1～g3, g5形成1∶1的包结配合物; Q[7]与客体g1～g6形成1∶1包结配合物, 同时计算了包结配合物的包结稳定常数, 探讨了主-客体的相互作用模式, 并利用¹H NMR、紫外吸收光谱法进行了佐证.     

三种瓜环与4,4＇-联吡啶及N,N＇-二甲基4,4＇-联吡啶盐酸盐相互作用的研究

以七元瓜环（Q[7]）和新型椭圆型改性瓜环——对称四甲基取代六元瓜环（TMeQ[6]）为主体，4,4＇-联吡啶的盐酸盐（44）以及N,N＇-二甲基4,4＇-联吡啶的盐酸盐（dm44）为客体的主客体相互作用进行了考察．实验结果表明，Q[7]与客体44及dm44作用体系中，客体为了更有效地被主体Q[7]包结，在Q[7]内腔中呈倾斜状分布的几率最高．用核磁共振、循环伏安以及紫外吸收光谱对实验结果进行了印证和补充，验证了TMeQ[6]与客体44及dm44可发生较强的相互作用，形成一维的自组装超分于结构，核磁共振以及循环伏安方法的实验结果表明，没有观察到Q[6]与客体44及dm44的明显作用，而紫外吸收光谱方法证实，Q[6]与客体44确实存在一定的相互作用，比较主客体的结构特征，该作用体系也可能存在自组装的一维超分子结构等多种作用形式．     

Host–guest complexes of some cucurbit[n]urils with the hydrochloride salts of some imidazole derivatives

Interaction between the normal cucurbit[n]urils (n = 6,7,8; Q[6], Q[7], Q[8]) and a sym-tetramethyl-substituted cucurbit[6]uril derivative (TMeQ[6]) with the hydrochloride salts of some imidazole derivatives N-(4-hydroxylphenyl)imidazole (g1), N-(4-aminophenyl)imidazole (g2), 2-phenylimidazole (g3) in aqueous solution was investigated by using ¹H NMR spectroscopy, electronic absorption spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy, as well as by using a single crystal X-ray diffraction determination. The ¹H NMR spectra analysis established a basic interaction model in which inclusion complexes with a host:guest ratio of 1:1 forms for the Q[6]s and Q[7] cases, while with a host:guest ratio of 1:2 form for the Q[8] cases. It was common that the hosts selectively bound the phenyl moiety of the guests. Absorption spectrophotometric and fluorescence spectroscopic analysis in aqueous solution defined the stability of the host–guest inclusion complexes at pH 5.8 with a host:guest ratio of 1:1 form quantitatively as logK values between 4 and 5 for the smaller hosts Q[6 or 7]s, while with a host:guest ratio of 1:2 form quantitatively as logK values between 11 and 12 for the host Q[8]. Two single crystal X-ray structures of the inclusion complexes TMeQ[6]-g2 · HCl and TMeQ[6]-g3 · HCl showed the phenyl moiety of these two guests inserted into the host cavity, which supported particularly the ¹H NMR spectroscopic study in solution.     

Host–guest complexes of various cucurbit[n]urils with the hydrochloride salt of 2,4-diaminoazobenzene

The interaction products of normal cucurbit[n]urils (n = 7, 8; Q[7] Q[8]) and a sym- tetramethyl-substituted cucurbit[6]uril derivative (TMeQ[6]) with the hydrochloride salts of 2,4-diaminoazobenzene (g·HCl) were investigated in aqueous solution using ¹H NMR spectroscopy, electronic absorption spectroscopy, as well as single crystal X-ray diffraction. The ¹H NMR spectra analysis established a basic interaction model in which inclusion complexes with a host:guest ratio of 1:1 form for the TMeQ[6] and Q[7] cases, while they form with a host:guest ratio of 1:2 for the Q[8] case. Commonly, the hosts selectively bound to the phenyl moieties of the guests. Absorption spectrophotometric analysis in aqueous solution defined the stability of the host–guest inclusion complexes at pH 3.2. Quantitatively, at this pH, complexes with a host:guest ratio of 1:1—those with smaller hosts TMeQ[6] and Q[7]—formed with logK values between 6 and 7. That with host Q[8] and a host:guest ratio of 1:2 formed with a logK value of 10.8. Single crystal X-ray structures of the inclusion complexes TMeQ[6]–g·HCl and Q[8]–g·HCl showed the phenyl moiety of the guest inserted into the host cavity. This result supports the solution-based ¹H NMR spectroscopic study.     

瓜环与喹啉衍生物包结配合行为研究

利用¹H NMR以及荧光技术研究了六、七、八元瓜环与2-苯基喹啉、N-正丙基溴化异喹啉、3-氨基喹啉及7,8-苯并喹啉的相互作用.两种方法的考察结果均表明,2-苯基喹啉能与这3种瓜环发生相互作用,其中六、七元瓜环与2-苯基喹啉形成1∶1的稳定包结配合物,包结常数分别为1.6×10⁴和3.2×10³L/mol.八元瓜环能与2-苯基喹啉形成1∶2包结物.¹H NMR结果还表明,3种瓜环均能与N-正丙基溴化异喹啉相互作用,其化学计量比均为1∶2;七元瓜环与7,8-苯并喹啉相互作用,化学计量比约为1∶1.荧光法也表明八元瓜环能与N-正丙基溴化异喹啉、3-氨基喹啉及7,8-苯并喹啉发生相互作用,并且荧光强度随瓜环浓度增加而下降,其化学计量比为1∶2.同时,讨论了上述主客体包结配合物的作用模式.     

Cucurbit[n]urils-induced room temperature phosphorescence of quinoline derivatives

The cucurbit[7,8]urils (Q[7] and Q[8])-induced room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) of quinoline and its derivatives were firstly found in the cucurbit[n]urils chemistry. The luminophores (quinolines) and their RTP are affected by the concentration of different Q[n]s, heavy metal ions and amounts, and pH. The RTP lifetime of the luminophore has been investigated. In presence of Na₂SO₃, the cation Tl⁺ led to stronger Q[n]-induced RTP, while the RTP lifetimes of luminophore/Q[7 or 8]/KI were generally longer than that of luminophore/Q[7 or 8]/TlNO₃, the RTP lifetimes of these systems were between 0.18 and 47.4 ms. Contrary to the stable 1:2 Q[8]:guest ternary inclusion complexes at lower pHs, as suggested by ¹H NMR, electronic absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy, low Q[8]-induced room temperature phosphorescence was observed. However, at higher pHs, high intensity of cucurbit[n]urils-induced room temperature phosphorescence of these quinoline derivatives were observed, and a 1:1 Q[8]:guest inclusion complex was formed. Investigations of dependence of RTP intensity on concentration of Q[n] revealed that the highest intensity of the Q[n]-induced RTP was observed at a low mole ratio of host:guest, which is closed to 1:1. It was presumably resulted from the strong interaction of Q[n] and these guests due to the combined hydrophobic cavity interaction and the hydrophilic portal interaction of the cucurbit[n]urils with the nitrogen heterocycles guest.     

八元瓜环与二(2-亚甲基-1,2,3,4-四氢异喹啉)的自组装模式

以用1,2,3,4-四氢喹啉和二溴乙烷合成的二(2-亚甲基-1,2,3,4-四氢异喹啉)的溴化氢酸盐为客体, 八元瓜环为主体, 利用1H NMR技术, 单晶X射线衍射方法以及理论计算等方法, 考察了两者的自组装模式. 1H NMR分析结果表明, 在溶液状态条件下, 不仅每一个八元瓜环分子同时与两个客体分子的芳环部分相互作用, 而且每一个客体分子两端的芳环部分同时与两个八元瓜环分子相互作用, 从而形成一维的自组装超分子链; 而在固体状态下, 每一个八元瓜环也可同时包结两个客体的芳环部分而形成三元的自组装结构, 但八元瓜环包结两个客体形成一独立的三元自组装结构. 利用晶体结构建立模型的计算结果说明, 模拟溶液状态比固体状态条件下的主客体包结更有利于体系能量的降低, 与主客体在溶液中1H NMR实验结果相符.     

六～八元瓜环与三种N-苄基取代笼状客体的相互作用

合成了3种具有对不同瓜环选择性各异的双探针N-苄基取代笼状客体, 它们分别是N-苄基六次甲基四胺盐酸盐(1), N-苄基喹啉环啶盐酸盐(2), N-苄基-1,4-二氮杂双环[2.2.1]辛烷盐酸盐(3), 利用¹H NMR和MS等方法对这些客体进行了表征. ¹H NMR显示, 六元瓜环仅对这些客体的苄基探针部分具有选择性作用, 形成作用比为1∶1的不对称包结配合物; 七元瓜环对客体1和3的苄基探针部分具有选择性作用, 形成作用比为1∶1的不对称包结配合物, 而对客体2的笼状奎宁环啶基部分具有选择性作用, 也形成作用比为1∶1的包结配合物; 八元瓜环也仅对这些客体的苄基探针部分具有选择性作用, 形成作用比为1∶2的对称包结配合物.     

Inclusion Interactions of Cucurbit[7]uril with Adenine and its Derivatives

Interactions of cucurbit[7]uril (Q[7] host) with guest adenine (g1), adenosine (g2) and 2′,3′-o-isopropylideneadenosine (g3) were studied in details by ¹H NMR, UV absorption spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. We found that the suitable pH range for interaction was between 1 and 7, and the optimal pH range was between 2 and 4. The ¹H NMR analysis indicated that Q[7] selectively interacted with the adenine moiety of the guests g1 and g2, while Q[7] selectively interacted with the D-ribose sugar ring moiety of the guest g3. Moreover, ¹H NMR spectra showed that the exchange between the bound guest and the free guest was fast on the NMR time scale for the Q[7]-g1 and Q[7]-g2 systems. However, an obvious equilibrium between the bound host/guest and the unbound host/guest were observed in the Q[7]-g3 complex. Several methods were used to determine quantitatively the stability of the three host–guest inclusion complexes formed between Q[7] and the guests. The formation constants by UV and fluorescence were 1.90 × 10⁵ L mol^? 1 and 1.34 × 10⁵ L mol^? 1 for Q[7]-g1, 9.41 × 10⁴ L mol^? 1 and 4.24 × 10⁴ L mol^? 1 for Q[7]-g2, 4.50 × 10⁴ L mol^? 1 and 3.62 × 10⁴ L mol^? 1 for Q[7]-g3, respectively. HPLC method was also introduced to explore the interactions between Q[7] and the adenine and its derivatives. The formation constants of the host–guest inclusion complexes, as determined by HPLC, were 6.76 × 10⁴ L mol^? 1 for Q[7]-g1, 1.80 × 10⁴ L mol^? 1 for Q[7]-g2, 3.01 × 10⁴ L mol^? 1 for Q[7]-g3 respectively. Our study suggested that Q[7] could be a suitable host for the delivery of bioactive molecules, such as the adenine and its derivatives.