Determination of 7-aminoflunitrazepam in urine by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ES-MS/MS) procedure was presented for the extraction and determination of 7-aminoflunitrazepam (7-aminoFM2), a biomarker of the hypnotic flunitrazepam (FM2) in urine sample. The method was based on the formation of tiny droplets of an organic extractant in the sample solution using water-immiscible organic solvent [dichloromethane (DCM), an extractant] dissolved in water-miscible organic dispersive solvent [isopropyl alcohol (IPA)]. First, 7-aminoFM2 from basified urine sample was extracted into the dispersed DCM droplets. The extracting organic phase was separated by centrifuging and the sedimented phase was transferred into a 300 μl vial insert and evaporated to dryness. The residue was reconstituted in 30 μl mobile phase (20:80, acetonitrile:water). An aliquot of 20 μl as injected into LC-ES-MS/MS. Various parameters affecting the extraction efficiency (type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, effect of alkali and salt) were evaluated. Under optimum conditions, precision, linearity (correlation coefficient, r² = 0.988 over the concentration range of 0.05-2.5 ng/ml), detection limit (0.025 ng/ml) and enrichment factor (20) had been obtained. To our knowledge, DLLME was applied to urine sample for the first time.     

Determination of phenylurea herbicides in aqueous samples using partitioned dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction

Partitioned dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (PDLLME), using THF as the dispersive solvent and dichloromethane as the extraction solvent, was utilized to isolate and concentrate phenylurea herbicides (PUHs) from aqueous samples. In PDLLME, a dispersive solvent should be able to partition in the organic extractant droplets to effectively extract the polar organic compounds from aqueous samples. The mixture of the water-immiscible extractant and the partitioned dispersive solvent was obtained by centrifugation, dried under low pressure, reconstituted in methanol-water mixture (1:1), and injected into a HPLC system for the determination of PUHs. The enrichment factors of the PUHs ranged from 68 to 126 under the optimal conditions. The linear range was 0.5-100 ng ml⁻¹ for each analyte, the relative standard deviations of PUHs were in the range of 1.5-5.9% (n = 5), and the detection limits (signal-to-noise ratio of 3) ranged from 0.10 to 0.28 ng ml⁻¹ for the herbicides. The range of intraday precision (n = 5) for PUHs at the levels of 0.5, 5, and 50 ng ml⁻¹ were 3.0-5.9%, 1.8-3.3%, and 2.2-3.6%, respectively. The range of interday precision (n = 5) at 0.5, 5, and 50 ng ml⁻¹ were 0.4-1.8%, 1.2-2.4%, and 0.9-2.3%, respectively. The recoveries of PUHs from three spiked river water samples, at a level of 10 ng ml⁻¹, were 91.2-104.1%. Due to its rapidity, ease of operation, and high recovery, PDLLME can be utilized to isolate and concentrate organic environmental contaminants such as PUHs from aqueous samples.     

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in water samples

A novel, simple and efficient dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet (DLLME-SFO) technique coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed for the determination of triclosan and its degradation product 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples. The extraction solvent used in this work is of low density, low volatility, low toxicity and proper melting point around room temperature. The extractant droplets can be collected easily by solidifying it at a lower temperature. Parameters that affect the extraction efficiency, including type and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, salt effect, pH and extraction time, were investigated and optimized in a 5 mL sample system by HPLC-UV. Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent: 12 μL of 1-dodecanol; dispersive solvent: 300 of μL acetonitrile; sample pH: 6.0; extraction time: 1 min), the limits of detection (LODs) of the pretreatment method combined with LC-MS/MS were in the range of 0.002-0.02 μg L(-1) which are lower than or comparable with other reported approaches applied to the determination of the same compounds. Wide linearities, good precisions and satisfactory relative recoveries were also obtained. The proposed technique was successfully applied to determine triclosan and 2,4-dichlorophenol in real water samples.     

Solid‐based disperser liquid–liquid microextraction for the preconcentration of phthalate esters and di‐(2‐ethylhexyl) adipate followed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection or mass spectrometry

A new approach for the development of a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by GC with flame ionization detection was proposed for the determination of phthalate esters and di‐(2‐ethylhexyl) adipate in aqueous samples. In the proposed method, solid and liquid phases were used as the disperser and extractant, respectively, providing a simple and fast mode for the extraction of the analytes into a small volume of an organic solvent. In this method, microliter levels of an extraction solvent was added onto a sugar cube and it was transferred into the aqueous phase containing the analytes. By manual shaking, the sugar was dissolved and the extractant was released into the aqueous phase as very tiny droplets to provide a cloudy solution. Under optimized conditions, the proposed method showed good precision (RSD less than 5.2%), high enrichment factors (266–556), and low LODs (0.09–0.25 μg/L). The method was successfully applied for the determination of the target analytes in different samples, and good recoveries (71–103%) were achieved for the spiked samples. No need for a disperser solvent and higher enrichment factors compared with conventional dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and low cost and short sample preparation time are other advantages of the method.     

Ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the determination of six pyrethroids in river water

A simple ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method combined with liquid chromatography was developed for the preconcentration and determination of six pyrethroids in river water samples. The procedure was based on a ternary solvent system to formatting tiny droplets of extractant in sample solution by dissolving appropriate amounts of water-immiscible extractant (tetrachloromethane) in watermiscible dispersive solvent (acetone). Various parameters that affected the extraction efficiency (such as type and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, extraction time, ultrasonic time, and centrifuging time) were evaluated. Under the optimum condition, good linearity was obtained in a range of 0.00059–1.52 mg L⁻¹ for all analytes with the correlation coefficient (r²) > 0.999. Intra-assay and inter-assay precision evaluated as the relative standard deviation (RSD) were less than 3.4 and 8.9%. The recoveries of six pyrethroids at three spiked levels were in the range of 86.2–109.3% with RSD of less than 8.7%. The enrichment factors for the six pyrethroids were ranged from 767 to 1033 folds.     

Molecular complex-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction: analysis of polar compounds in aqueous solution

A novel molecular complex-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) method was established via hydrogen bond interaction between the extractant and the analytes. In this approach, tri-n-butylphosphate (TBP), a Lewis base, was directly used, instead of the traditional water-immiscible organic solvents, as the extractant for DLLME. The phenols (p-benzenediol, m-benzenediol, o-benzenediol and phenol), which are typical Lewis acids, were successfully extracted from environmental aqueous samples. In addition, phase separation was achieved in a disposable polyethylene pipet with the open and narrow tip upside, for a collection of the above extractant layer, i.e. TBP. To achieve satisfactory extraction performance, several extraction parameters, such as type of extractant solvents, extractant volume, pH of sample solution, ionic strength of sample solution and extraction time, were optimized. Additionally, the proposed method was applied to environmental water samples. Under the optimized conditions, the limits of detection and limits of quantification for the phenols were 7-29 and 25-98 μg/L, respectively. The calibration curves showed good linearity (r(2)≥0.9961) over the investigated concentration range. The repeatability of the method was investigated by evaluating the intra- and inter-day precisions. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) obtained were lower than 11.2% and 13.9% at different concentration levels. The recoveries ranged from 83.2% to 117.8%, with RSDs less than 13.1%. The developed approach provides a new way to facilitate DLLME of organic polar compounds from aqueous solutions. Moreover, it enables a convenient collection of solvent less dense making use of a cheap and disposable polyethylene pipet.     

Air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction by solidifying the floating organic droplets for the rapid determination of seven fungicide residues in juice samples

A novel air assisted liquid–liquid microextraction using the solidification of a floating organic droplet method (AALLME-SFO) was developed for the rapid and simple determination of seven fungicide residues in juice samples, using the gas chromatography with electron capture detector (GC-ECD). This method combines the advantages of AALLME and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic droplets (DLLME-SFO) for the first time. In this method, a low-density solvent with a melting point near room temperature was used as the extraction solvent, and the emulsion was rapidly formed by pulling in and pushing out the mixture of aqueous sample solution and extraction solvent for ten times repeatedly using a 10-mL glass syringe. After centrifugation, the extractant droplet could be easily collected from the top of the aqueous samples by solidifying it at a temperature lower than the melting point. Under the optimized conditions, good linearities with the correlation coefficients (γ) higher than 0.9959 were obtained and the limits of detection (LOD) varied between 0.02 and 0.25 μg L⁻¹. The proposed method was applied to determine the target fungicides in juice samples and acceptable recoveries ranged from 72.6% to 114.0% with the relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 2.3–13.0% were achieved. Compared with the conventional DLLME method, the newly proposed method will neither require a highly toxic chlorinated solvent for extraction nor an organic dispersive solvent in the application process; hence, it is more environmentally friendly.     

Development of organic solvents‐free mode of solidification of floating organic droplet–based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from honey samples before their determination by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

In this study, a green mode of solidification of floating organic droplet – based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction has been developed for the extraction of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from honey samples before their determination by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. In this method, an appropriate volume of menthol:decanoic acid deep eutectic solvent (as an extraction solvent) is added on a sugar cube (as a disperser agent). In the following, the cube is released into the diluted honey sample placed in a tube. After manual shaking a cloudy state is obtained as a result of dispersing the extraction solvent droplets throughout the sample solution and the analytes are extracted into them. After placing the tube in an ice bath, the droplet of the extractant is solidified on the top of the solution. This drop is taken and after dissolving in acetonitrile, an aliquot of the solution is injected into the separation system. Under optimum conditions, the suggested approach had high extraction recoveries (76–93%) and enrichment factors (380–465), low limits of detection (14–52 ng/kg) and quantification (47–173 ng/kg), and satisfactory repeatability (relative standard deviation ≤ 9%).     

Sequential injection dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on fatty alcohols and poly(etheretherketone)-turnings for metal determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry

A novel, simple and efficient sequential injection (SI) on-line dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) procedure was described and was demonstrated for the assay of trace silver determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). Fatty alcohols, such as 1-undecanol and 1-dodecanol, were examined as extraction solvents at microlitre volume, overcoming a major problem of the DLLME methods, the high toxicity of the extraction solvents used. Furthermore, the extractant fine droplets can be easily separated from the aqueous phase using a micro-column packed with a novel hydrophobic sorbent material, poly(etheretherketone)-turnings. In this method fine droplets of 1-dodecanol were on-line generated and dispersed into the stream of aqueous sample. By this continuous process, silver diethyldithiocarbamate (Ag-DDTC) complex was formed and extracted into the dispersed extraction solvent. No specific conditions such as ice bath for low temperature or special tools are required for extractant isolation. All significant parameters that influence the efficiency of the system such as sample acidity, concentration of complexing reagent and extraction solvent, flow-rate of disperser and sample solution as well as the preconcentration time were investigated and optimized by full factorial design. Under the optimized conditions a detection limit of 0.15 μg L⁻¹, a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2.9% at 5.00 μg L⁻¹ Ag(I) concentration level and an enhancement factor of 186 were obtained. The developed method was evaluated by analyzing certified reference material and was applied successfully to the analysis of environmental water samples.     

溶剂去乳化-悬浮固化分散液液微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用测定水中的有机氯农药

建立了溶剂去乳化-悬浮固化分散液液微萃取技术结合气相色谱-质谱联用技术同时测定水样中8种有机氯农药的方法。以正十六烷作为萃取剂,将其与分散剂丙酮混合后,快速注入水样,获得乳化体系并完成萃取;然后加入丙酮作为去乳化剂破坏乳化体系,不需要经过离心即能使两相分层;经冰浴冷冻使其固化后,取出上层凝固的有机相(正十六烷)在室温下融化,取上清液进行GC-MS分析。考察了萃取剂、分散剂、去乳化剂的种类和体积,水样盐浓度和pH值对萃取效率的影响。结果表明,8种有机氯农药在0.025~2.00 μg/L范围内有良好的线性关系(r=0.9995~0.9999), 8种有机氯农药的检出限为0.012~0.024 μg/L,精密度为3.15%~4.53%,富集倍数为96~101。将该方法应用于农田池塘水的测定,加标回收率为96.77%~102.93%,精密度为2.68%~4.86%。方法快速灵敏,有机溶剂消耗少,对环境友好,操作简便,适用于水中有机氯农药的批量分析,并为实现其样品前处理的自动化提供了技术和方法学的支持。     

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with little solvent consumption combined with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the pretreatment of organochlorine pesticides in aqueous samples

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with little solvent consumption (DLLME-LSC), a novel dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with few solvent requirements (13 μL of a binary mixture of disperser solvent and extraction solvent in the ratio of 6:4) and short extraction time (90 s), has been developed for extraction of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) from water samples prior to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis. In DLLME-LSC, much less volume of organic solvent is used as compared to DLLME. The new technique is less harmful to environment and yields a higher enrichment factor (1885–2648-fold in this study). Fine organic droplets were formed in the sample solution by manually shaking the test tube containing the mixture of sample solution and extraction solvent. The large surface area of the organic solvent droplets increases the rate of mass transfer from the water sample to the extractant and produces efficient extraction in a short period of time. DLLME-LSC shows good repeatability (RSD: 4.1–9.7% for reservoir water; 5.6–8.9% for river water) and high sensitivity (limits of detection: 0.8–2.5 ng/L for reservoir water; 0.4–1.3 ng/L for river water). The method can be used on various water samples (river water, tap water, sea water and reservoir water). It can be used for routine work for the investigation of OCPs.     

A novel dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous samples

A new dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet method (DLLME-SFO) was developed for the determination of five kinds of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental water samples. In this method, no specific holder, such as the needle tip of microsyringe and the hollow fiber, is required for supporting the organic microdrop due to the using of organic solvent with low density and proper melting point. Furthermore, the extractant droplet can be collected easily by solidifying it in the lower temperature. 1-Dodecanol was chosen as extraction solvent in this work. A series of parameters that influence extraction were investigated systematically. Under optimal conditions, enrichment factors (EFs) for PAHs were in the range of 88-118. The limit of detections (LODs) for naphthalene, diphenyl, acenaphthene, anthracene and fluoranthene were 0.045, 0.86, 0.071, 1.1 and 0.66 ng mL⁻¹, respectively. Good reproducibility and recovery of the method were also obtained. Compared with the traditional liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods, the proposed method obtained about 2 times higher enrichment factor than those in LPME. Moreover, the solidification of floating organic solvent facilitated the phase transfer. And most importantly, it avoided using high-density and toxic solvent in the traditional DLLME method. The proposed method was successfully applied to determinate PAHs in the environmental water samples. The simple and low-cost method provides an alternative method for the analysis of non-polar compounds in complex environmental water.     

Suitability of tetrahydofuran as a dopant and the comparison to other existing dopants in dopant‐assisted atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry in support of drug discovery

In this paper, we investigated the suitability of tetrahydofuran (THF) as a dopant and compared it against other common dopants for atmospheric pressure photoionization mass spectrometry (APPI‐MS). In a systematic analysis of 37 drug standards and 100 Wyeth proprietary drug candidates, THF was found to increase ionization efficiency as high as 33‐fold when introduced through a syringe pump at a flow rate of 20 µL/min, and as high as 114‐fold when introduced through the mobile phase at 100 µL/min. As a dopant, THF is as effective as acetone, better than anisole, and slightly less effective than toluene for the majority of the test compounds. The increase in ionization efficiency by THF was found to be compound‐dependent. THF was more effective in facilitating the ionization of polar compounds than of non‐polar compounds. With THF, toluene and acetone as dopants, a single type of molecular ion ([M+H]⁺ or M^+?) is produced for analyte molecules. However, anisole can cause the formation of an ion cluster for polar analytes. The cluster contains [M–2H+H]⁺, M^+?, and [M+H]⁺ ions with varied ratios. This complexity may make interpretation of spectra difficult for unknown compounds when complimentary data are not available. Our findings indicate that THF is a suitable dopant in the daily usage for increasing ionization efficiency, especially when THF is used as the mobile phase or as an organic modifier in the mobile phase. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Solvent-bar microextraction—Using a silica monolith as the extractant phase holder

In this paper, a novel liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) approach, based on solvent-bar microextraction (SBME), was developed in which a silica monolith was used as the extractant solvent holder. Owing to the porous nature of the monolith, the extractant solvent could be easily held in the material; when the monolith containing the extractant solvent was exposed to the sample solution, analytes could directly diffuse from the sample solution into the extractant solvent. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were used as model analytes to evaluate the procedure. Through the investigation of the effect of agitation speed, extraction time, length of the monolith (that determined the volume of organic extractant solvent) and salt concentration on extraction efficiency, the following optimal extraction conditions were obtained: stirring at 1000 rpm for 30 min without salt addition using a 4-mm silica monolith. The limits of detection ranged from 3.9 pg/mL to 28.8 pg/mL, with relative standard deviations of between 8.16% and 10.5% on the same silica monolith. The linearity was 0.05–200 ng/mL for fluoranthene and pyrene, and 0.5–200 ng/mL for chrysene and benzo[b]fluoranthene, with acceptable correlation coefficient. When this method was applied for the spiked real river sample, the relative recoveries ranged from 87.1% to 100.7% for the tested PAHs. This method was also compared to polymeric hollow fiber-based SBME and hollow fiber-protected LPME and found to provide better results. Additionally, compared with the polymeric hollow fiber, the silica monolith possesses good resistance to extreme conditions, such as high temperature and pH, and is more compatible with various organic solvents. This is the first report of an application of a monolithic material for LPME, and as a solvent holder for SBME. It extends the scope of applications of such materials, to analytical chemistry, specifically to sample preparation.     

A dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction using a switchable polarity dispersive solvent. Automated HPLC-FLD determination of ofloxacin in chicken meat

In this article, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), based on the use of so-called switchable polarity dispersive solvent (SPDS) for microextraction, is presented for the first time. The new extraction technique makes use of a mixture of extraction solvent (dichloromethane) and the SPDS (acrylic acid). This mixture is injected into the aqueous sample solution, which was previously fortified with the alkaline agent (NaOH). The SPDS is dissolved in aqueous phase and a cloudy solution consisting of fine droplets of extraction solvent fully dispersed in the aqueous phase is observed. Simultaneously, as a consequence of the fast neutralization reaction, the SPDS investigated is converted into water-soluble salt and phase separation is achieved because the SPDS switches its polarity. Conversion of the SPDS excludes the negative influence of the conventional dispersive solvents used in DLLME on the solubility of target analytes in aqueous phase and, as a result, increases the DLLME efficiency.     

Using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and liquid chromatography for determination of guaifenesin enantiomers in human urine

A simple, rapid, and efficient method, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high‐performance liquid chromatography‐fluorescence detector, has been developed for the determination of guaifenesin (GUA) enantiomers in human urine samples after an oral dose administration of its syrup formulation. Urine samples were collected during the time intervals 0–2, 2–4, and 4–6 h and concentration and ratio of two enantiomers was determined. The ratio of R‐(?) to S‐(+) enantiomer concentrations in urine showed an increase with time, with R/S ratios of 0.66 at 2 h and 2.23 at 6 h. For microextraction process, a mixture of extraction solvent (dichloromethane, 100 μL) and dispersive solvent (THF, 1 mL) was rapidly injected into 5.0 mL diluted urine sample for the formation of cloudy solution and extraction of enantiomers into the fine droplets of CH₂Cl₂. After optimization of HPLC enantioselective conditions, some important parameters, such as the kind and volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, extraction time, temperature, pH, and salt effect were optimized for dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction process. Under the optimum extraction condition, the method yields a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 10 to 2000 ng/mL for target analytes. LOD was 3.00 ng/mL for both of the enantiomers.     

Comparison of extraction procedures for the determination of arsenic and other elements in lobster tissue by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

A variety of extraction procedures were evaluated for the extraction of arsenic and other analytes from lobster tissue samples using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) detection. Soxhlet, room temperature mixing, sonication, microwave assisted, supercritical carbon dioxide and subcritical water extractions were evaluated for a variety of solvent systems and optimum conditions determined using a partially defatted Lobster Hepatopancreas marine certified reference material, TORT-2 (National Research Council of Canada). The solubility trends and solvents into which the analytes extracted gave an indication as to the polar/non-polar nature of the compounds present. Analytes that prefer water are probably more polar or inorganic, while those preferring methanol solutions are less polar or organic in nature. Arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, molybdenum and selenium were probably all present in TORT-2 in both polar inorganic and non-polar organic forms. While TORT-2 may have contained similar amounts of selenium in both forms, the results suggested that more of the arsenic was present as less polar or more organic compounds, and cobalt existed mainly as more polar or inorganic species. Most of the extraction techniques suggested that, although there may be some less polar organic forms present, more of the cadmium was probably present as polar inorganic compounds. Additionally, most techniques indicated that molybdenum was possibly all less polar or more organic in nature. In general, microwave assisted extraction (MAE) yielded comparable or improved recoveries for all of the analytes monitored and usually required less solvent. Additionally, MAE proved to be the mildest, fastest, least complicated and most reproducible extraction technique evaluated. MAE at 75 degrees C for 2 min exposure time yielded quantitative recovery of arsenic from TORT-2. These conditions were evaluated for lobster tissue samples purchased from a local restaurant. Separate evaluation of the lobster meat and organs resulted in quantitative recoveries of arsenic from both tissue samples. The results indicated that the extraction efficiencies might have some dependence upon the extraction technique, extraction conditions, analyte, solvent, and sample matrix.     

Optimization of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic droplets using an orthogonal array design and its application for the determination of fungicide concentrations in environmental water samples

A dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method based on the solidification of floating organic droplets was developed as a simple and sensitive method for the simultaneous determination of the concentrations of multiple fungicides (triazolone, chlorothalonil, cyprodinil, and trifloxystrobin) in water by high‐performance liquid chromatography with variable‐wavelength detection. After an approach varying one factor at a time was used, an orthogonal array design [L₂₅ (5⁵)] was employed to optimize the method and to determine the interactions between the parameters. The significance of the effects of the different factors was determined using analysis of variance. The results indicated that the extraction solvent volume significantly affects the efficiency of the extraction. Under optimal conditions, the relative standard deviation (n = 5) varied from 2.3 to 5.5% at 0.1 μg/mL for each analyte. Low limits of detection were obtained and ranged from 0.02 to 0.2 ng/mL. In addition, the proposed method was applied to the analysis of fungicides in real water samples. The results show that the dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic droplets is a potential method for detecting fungicides in environmental water samples, with recoveries of the target analytes ranging from 70.1 to 102.5%.     

Lab in a syringe: fully automated dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with integrated spectrophotometric detection

A new approach for the integration of various analytical steps inside a syringe (Lab in a Syringe) is presented. Fully automated dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with integrated spectrophotometric detection is carried out in-syringe using a very simple instrumental setup. The lighter-than-water organic droplets released in the extraction step accumulate at the head of the syringe, where two optical fibers are placed on both sides of the syringe, facing each other and enabling the in situ quantification of the extracted compounds. By this, monitoring of the progressively accumulating droplet in the head of the syringe was further possible. In this first report, the developed instrumental setup has been applied to the determination of the dye rhodamine B in water samples and soft drinks. The main parameters influencing the extraction such as the selection of the extractant and disperser solvents, extractant/disperser and organic/water phase ratios, pH of the aqueous phase, extraction flow rates, and extraction time were investigated. Under the selected conditions, rhodamine B was quantified in a working range of 0.023-2 mg L(-1) with a limit of detection of 0.007 mg L(-1). Good repeatability values of up to 3.2% (RSD) were obtained for ten consecutive extractions. The enrichment factor for a 1 mg L(-1) rhodamine B standard was 23, and up to 51 extractions were accomplished in 1 h.     

苄基功能化离子液体对有机磷和苯环化合物的分散液-液微萃取性能研究

以苄基功能化的离子液体1-苄基-3-甲基咪唑双三氟甲烷磺酰亚胺(1-Benzyl-3-methylimidazolium bis [(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide,[BeMIM][Tf2 N])作为分散液-液微萃取的萃取剂,与高效液相色谱联用,用于环境水样中5种有机磷农药(辛硫磷、杀螟松、毒死蜱、甲拌磷和对硫磷)以及2种苯环化合物(氯化萘和蒽)的萃取与富集。并与其它离子液体([OMIM][Tf2 N])以及普通有机溶剂(CCl4和 C2 Cl4)的萃取效能进行了对比。萃取优化条件为：40μL [BeMIM][Tf2 N]作为萃取剂,1 mL 甲醇作为分散剂,离心时间5 min,样品溶液中不添加盐。在优化的条件下,本方法的线性关系良好(R2=0.9994~0.9998);对10,40和100μg/ L 不同添加浓度重复测定5次的日内和日间 RSD 分别为1.1%~4.3%和0.8%~4.8%,LOD 为0.01~1.0μg/ L (S/ N=3)。将本方法用于3种实际水样中目标分析物的测定,加标回收率和 RSD 分别为82.7%~118.3%和0.7%~5.6%。由于在咪唑环上引入了苄基基团,[BeMIM][Tf2 N]与目标分析物之间除存在疏水作用外,还存在π-π作用,故对目标物的萃取效率明显提高,富集倍数和回收率分别高达339和81.4%。测定了分析物在[BeMIM][Tf2 N]-DLLME 体系中的分配系数,对萃取机制进行初步探讨。