Sorption of uranyl ions on hydrous titanium dioxide

Summary The mechanism of the sorption of U on TiO₂ · x H₂O is investigated in absence and in presence of carbonate as function of pH. Speciation of U in solution and the state of the surface of TiO₂ · x H₂O are taken into account. In the experiments the mole fractions of the U species in presence of carbonate are the same as in seawater. Below pH 5 the sorption of U can be described in absence and in presence of carbonate by ion exchange of UO ₂ ²⁺ or alternatively by sorption of UO₂OH⁺, because hydrolysis and sorption are occurring simultaneously. Above pH 5 in absence of carbonate, first pH-independent sorption of (UO₂)₃(OH) ₇ ^– and then (above the isoelectric point of TiO₂ · x H₂O) pH-dependent sorption of (UO₂)₃(OH) ₇ ^– are observed. In the same pH range, but in presence of carbonate, two species of U are dominating in solution, first UO₂CO₃OH^– and then UO₂(CO₃) ₃ ^4– · UO₂CO₃OH^– is not sorbed in measurable amounts which causes a drastic decrease of the sorption ratio. UO₂(CO₃) ₃ ^4– , which begins to dominate above pH 6 (depending on the carbonate concentration), is sorbed either by formation of TiOUO₂ bonds or (at carbonate concentrations >10^–2 mol/l) via carbonate bridges.

---

Sorption von Uranylionen an wasserhaltigem Titandioxid

     

Oxo–Group‐14‐Element Bond Formation in Binuclear Uranium(V) Pacman Complexes

Simple and versatile routes to the functionalization of uranyl‐derived U^V–oxo groups are presented. The oxo‐lithiated, binuclear uranium(V)–oxo complexes [{(py)₃LiOUO}₂(L)] and [{(py)₃LiOUO}(OUOSiMe₃)(L)] were prepared by the direct combination of the uranyl(VI) silylamide “ate” complex [Li(py)₂][(OUO)(N”)₃] (N”=N(SiMe₃)₂) with the polypyrrolic macrocycle H₄L or the mononuclear uranyl (VI) Pacman complex [UO₂(py)(H₂L)], respectively. These oxo‐metalated complexes display distinct U? O single and multiple bonding patterns and an axial/equatorial arrangement of oxo ligands. Their ready availability allows the direct functionalization of the uranyl oxo group leading to the binuclear uranium(V) oxo–stannylated complexes [{(R₃Sn)OUO}₂(L)] (R=nBu, Ph), which represent rare examples of mixed uranium/tin complexes. Also, uranium–oxo‐group exchange occurred in reactions with [TiCl(OiPr)₃] to form U‐O? C bonds [{(py)₃LiOUO}(OUOiPr)(L)] and [(iPrOUO)₂(L)]. Overall, these represent the first family of uranium(V) complexes that are oxo‐functionalised by Group 14 elements.     

Structural Observations of Heterometallic Uranyl Copper(II) Carboxylates and Their Solid‐State Topotactic Transformation upon Dehydration

The hydrothermal reactions of uranyl nitrate and metallic copper with aromatic polycarboxylic acids gave rise to the formation of five heterometallic UO₂²⁺? Cu²⁺ coordination polymers: (UO₂)Cu(H₂O)₂(1,2‐bdc)₂ ( 1 ; 1,2‐bdc=phthalate), (UO₂)Cu(H₂O)₂(btec) ? 4 H₂O ( 2 ) and (UO₂)Cu(btec) ( 2′ ; btec=pyromellitate), (UO₂)₂Cu(H₂O)₄(mel) ( 3 ; mel=mellitate), and (UO₂)₂O(OH)₂Cu(H₂O)₂(1,3‐bdc) ? H₂O ( 4 ; 1,3‐bdc=isophthlalate). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of compound 1 revealed 2D layers of chains of UO₈ and CuO₄(H₂O)₂ units that were connected through the phthalate ligands. In compound 2 , these sheets were connected to each other through the two additional carboxylate arms of the pyromellitate, thus resulting in a 3D open‐framework with 1D channels that trapped water molecules. Upon heating, free and bonded water species (from Cu? OH₂) were evacuated from the structure. This thermal transition was followed by in situ XRD and IR spectroscopy. Heating induced a solid‐state topotactic transformation with the formation of a new set of Cu? O interactions in the crystalline anhydrous structure ( 2′ ), in order to keep the square‐planar environment around the copper centers. The structure of compound 3 was built up from trinuclear motifs, in which one copper center, CuO₄(OH₂)₂, was linked to two uranium units, UO₅(H₂O)₂. The assembly of this trimer, “U₂Cu”, with the mellitate generated a 3D network. Complex 4 contained a tetranuclear uranyl core of UO₅(OH)₂ and UO₆(OH) units that were linked to two copper centers, CuO(OH)₂(H₂O)₂, which were then connected to each other through isophthalate ligands and U?O? Cu interactions to create a 3D structure. The common structural feature of these different compounds is a bridging oxo group of U?O? Cu type, which is reflected by apical Cu? O distances in the range 2.350(3)–2.745(5) Å. In the case of a shorter Cu? O distance, a slight lengthening of the uranyl bond (U?O) is observed (e.g., 1.805(3) Å in complex 4 ).     

The Rb analogue of grimselite,Rb6Na2[(UO2)(CO3)3]2(H2O)

The crystal structure of the Rb analogue of grimselite, rubidium sodium uranyl tricarbonate hydrate, Rb₆Na₂[(UO₂)(CO₃)₃]₂(H₂O), consists of a uranyl hexagonal bipyramid that shares three non‐adjacent equatorial edges with carbonate triangles, resulting in a uranyl tricarbonate cluster of composition [(UO₂)(CO₃)₃)]. These uranyl tricarbonate clusters form layers perpendicular to [001] and are interconnected by NaO₈ polyhedra. The title compound is isostructural with grimselite, with a reduced occupancy of the H₂O site (25% versus 50% in grimselite).     

Room‐Temperature Activation of H2 by a Surface Frustrated Lewis Pair

Surface frustrated Lewis pairs (SFLPs) have been implicated in the gas‐phase heterogeneous (photo)catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ to CO and CH₃OH by In₂O_3?x(OH)_y. A key step in the reaction pathway is envisioned to be the heterolysis of H₂ on a proximal Lewis acid–Lewis base pair, the SFLP, the chemistry of which is described as In???In‐OH + H₂ → In‐OH₂⁺???In‐H^?. The product of the heterolysis, thought to be a protonated hydroxide Lewis base In‐OH₂⁺ and a hydride coordinated Lewis acid In‐H^?, can react with CO₂ to form either CO or CH₃OH. While the experimental and theoretical evidence is compelling for heterolysis of H₂ on the SFLP, all conclusions derive from indirect proof, and direct observation remains lacking. Unexpectedly, we have discovered rhombohedral In₂O_3?x(OH)_y can enable dissociation of H₂ at room temperature, which allows its direct observation by several analytical techniques. The collected analytical results lean towards the heterolysis rather than the homolysis reaction pathway.     

Tetrapotassium dicarbonato­dioxo­peroxo­uranium(VI) 2.5‐hydrate,K4[U(CO3)2O2(O2)]·2.5H2O

The title compound was obtained by reacting UO₂ powder in 2 M K₂CO₃ with hydrogen peroxide. The compound contains individual [U(CO₃)₂O₂(O₂)]⁴⁻ ions, which are linked via an extended network of K atoms and hydrogen bonding. The U atom is coordinated to two trans‐axial O atoms and six O atoms in the equatorial plane, forming distorted hexagonal bipyramids. The carbonate ligands are bound to the U center in a bidentate manner, with U—O bond distances ranging from 2.438 (5) to 2.488 (5) Å. The peroxo group forms a three‐membered ring with the U atom, with U—O bond distances of 2.256 (6) and 2.240 (6) Å. The U=O bond distances of 1.806 (5) and 1.817 (5) Å, and an O—U—O angle of 175.3 (3)° are characteristic of the linear uranyl(VI) unit.     

Uranyl complexation by monodentate nitrogen donor ligands. A relativistic density functional study

To examine the interaction of uranyl with nitrogen containing groups of humic substances, the model complexes [UO₂(H₂O)₄L_N]²⁺, L_N = NH₂CH₃, N(CH₃)₃, and NC₅H₅ in aqueous solution were studied computationally with an all‐electron relativistic density functional method. Results are compared with the corresponding penta‐aqua complex of uranyl. Although pyridine coordinates with about the same strength as L = H₂O, methylamine binds ～10 kJ mol^?1 stronger and trimethylamine ～40 kJ mol^?1 weaker than a fifth aqua ligand. Yet, each of these ligands L_N donates about the same amount of charge to uranyl as L = H₂O. U? N bonds are ～10 pm longer than the U? O bonds of the aqua ligands. From the present model results, one does not expect that, when compared with carboxyl groups, monodentate N‐containing functional groups contribute significantly to uranyl complexation by humic substances. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2011     

Structural studies on 3-acetyl-1,5-diaryl and 3-cyano-1,5-diaryl formazan chelates with cerium(III), thorium(IV) and uranium(VI)

Summary Solid complexes of 3-acetyl-1,5-diaryl and 3-cyano-1,5-diaryl formazans were prepared and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, NMR, TGA and DTA analyses. Based on these studies, the suggested general formula for the complexes is [M(HL) _m (OH^–) _n or (NO ₃ ^– or Cl^–) _x ·(H₂O) _y or (C₂H₅OH orDMSO) _z , where HL=formazanM=Ce³⁺, Th⁴⁺, and UO ₂ ²⁺ ,m=1–2,n=0–3,x=0–3,y=0–4 andz=0–3. The metal ions are expected to have coordination numbers 6–8.

---

Strukturuntersuchungen an 3-Acetyl-1,5-diaryl- und 3-Cyan-1,5-diaryl-formazan-Chelaten mit Cer(III), Thorium(IV) und Uran(VI)

Zusammenfassung Die hergestellten Chelate wurden mittels Elementaranalyse, IR, NMR, TGA und DTA charakterisiert. Darauf basierend wird die generelle Formel [M(HL) _m (OH^–) _n bzw. (NO ₃ ^– oder Cl^–) _x ·(H₂O) _y oder (C₂H₅OH bzw.DMSO) _z ] vorgeschlagen, wobei HL=Formazan,M=Ce³⁺, Th⁴⁺ oder UO ₂ ²⁺ ,m=1–2,n=0–3,x=0–3,y=0–4 undz=0–3. Die Metallionen haben Koordinationszahlen von 6–8.

     

Spectroscopic investigation of uranium sorption on soil surface using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

A study was carried out to understand the sorption of uranium (U) onto soil surface and identify the species of U on soil surface using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS). For the study soil was amended with uranyl nitrate and surface speciation study was carried out by investigating the energy region for U in spectrum. Analysis of spectrum revealed that U is present in U(VI) state. Deconvolution of XPS spectrum of U(VI) sorbed on soil surface revealed that U(VI) species such as, UO₂ ²⁺ and (UO₂)_x(OH) _y ^(2x?y)+ form complex with silanol, aluminol and goethite sites. The possible surface complexation is: ≡Al(OH)₂UO₂ ²⁺, ≡SiO₂UO₂, ≡SiO₂(UO₂)₃(OH)₅ and ≡Fe(OH)₂UO₂.     

Complex Formation of Rhenium (V) with Benzimidazole in Acidic Media

Rhenium(V) complexes of 1H-benzimidazole (L), isolated from acidic media: (HL)₂[ReOX₅]·(H₂O) _n and [ReOL _x X _y (H₂O) _z ](H₂O) _n (HL and L are protonated and deprotonated forms of benzimidazole; X = Cl^-, Br^-) were studied by means of IR spectroscopy, ¹H NMR spectroscopy, and thermal analysis.     

Oxidative leaching of uranium from SIMFUEL using Na<Subscript>2</Subscript>CO<Subscript>3</Subscript>–H<Subscript>2</Subscript>O<Subscript>2</Subscript> solution

A feasibility and basic study to find a possibility to develop such a process for recovering U alone from spent fuel by using the methods of an oxidative leaching and a precipitation of U in high alkaline carbonate media was newly suggested with the characteristics of a highly enhanced proliferation-resistance and more environmental friendliness. This study has focused on the examination of an oxidative leaching of uranium from SIMFUEL powders contained 16 elements (U, Ce, Gd, La, Nd, Pr, Sm, Eu, Y, Mo, Pd, Ru, Zr, Ba, Sr, and Te) using a Na₂CO₃ solution with hydrogen peroxide. U₃O₈ was dissolved more rapidly than UO₂ in a carbonate solution. However, in the presence of H₂O₂, we can find out that the leaching rates of the reduced SIMFUEL powder are faster than the oxidized SIMFUEL powder. In carbonate solutions with hydrogen peroxide, uranium oxides were dissolved in the form of uranyl peroxo-carbonato complexes. UO₂(O₂) _x (CO₃) _y ^2−2x−2y , where x/y has 1/2, 2/1.     

Coordination polymer of uranyl nitrate with 4,4,10,10-Tetramethyl-1,3,7,9-Tetraazaspiro[5.5]undecane-2,8-dione (Spirocarbone, Sk): Synthesis and study of molecular and crystal structures

The coordination polymer {[UO₂(NO₃)₂(C₁₁H₂₀N₄O₂)] · 2H₂O} _n (I) was obtained and examined by X-ray diffraction. The crystals are monoclinic, space group C2/c; a = 23.1386(13), b = 5.41575(15), c = 19.7769(11) Å, β = 125.285(8)°, V = 2023.01(17) ų, ρ_calcd = 2.20 g/cm³, Z = 4. The U atom occupies a special position in the center of inversion. Its coordination polyhedron is a distorted hexagonal bipyramid with axial oxo ligands. In the equatorial plane, the U(1) atom is coordinated by four O atoms of two bidentate nitrate anions and two O atoms of two carbonyl groups of organic spirocarbone (Sk) molecules, which are related by the symmetry operation (0.5 ? x, 0.5 ? y, ?z). In the crystal, polymer chains are parallel to the direction (101). Water molecules are hydrogen-bonded to the N(1) atom of ligand Sk; in addition, they are linked together by the intermolecular hydrogen bonds O(6)-H(6d)…O(6)ⁱ(ⁱ1/2 ? x, ?1/2 + y, 1/2 ? z); H…O 2.11 Å angle O-H…O 160°) and to the nitrate anions by the hydrogen bonds O(6)-H(6e)…O(3)ⁱ; H…O 2.29 Å; the angle O-H…O 149°). In the crystal, hydrogen-bonded water molecules form chains along the axis y that are perpendicular to the coordination polymers. To verify the purity of complex I, the Rietveld refinement of its X-ray powder diffraction pattern was performed. At room temperature, the unit cell parameters are a = 23.2965(6), b = 5.51225(15), c = 19.8588(6) Å, β = 125.6063(17)°, V = 2073.40(10) ų.     

Synthesis and physicochemical characterization of nanocrystalline chitosan-containing calcium carbonate apatites

The CaCl₂-(NH₄)₂HPO₄-NH₄HCO₃-(C₆H₁₁NO₄) _n -H₂O system at 25°C has been investigated by the solubility (Tananaev’s residual concentration) method and pH measurements. Coprecipitation conditions have been determined for nanocrystalline type A and B calcium carbonate apatites. Type A: Ca₁₀(PO₄)₆(CO₃) _x (OH)_{2 − 2x} · yC₆H₁₁NO₄ · zH₂O (x = 0.2, 0.5, 1.0; y = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5; z = 5.3−6.7); type B: Ca₁₀[(PO₄)_5.7(CO₃)_0.45]CO₃ · 0.3C₆H₁₁NO₄ · 9H₂O, and Ca₁₀[(PO₄)_5.55(CO₃)_0.675]CO₃ · 0.3C₆H₁₁NO₄ · 9.2H₂O. The solid phases have been characterized by chemical analysis, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and IR spectroscopy.     

Ligand Functionalization and Its Effect on CO2 Adsorption in Microporous Metal–Organic Frameworks

We report two new 3D structures, [Zn₃(bpdc)₃(2,2′‐dmbpy)] (DMF)_x(H₂O)_y ( 1 ) and [Zn₃(bpdc)₃(3,3′‐dmbpy)]?(DMF)₄(H₂O)_0.5 ( 2 ), by methyl functionalization of the pillar ligand in [Zn₃(bpdc)₃(bpy)] (DMF)₄?(H₂O) ( 3 ) (bpdc=biphenyl‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid; z,z′‐dmbpy=z,z′‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyridine; bpy=4,4′‐bipyridine). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis indicates that 2 is isostructural to 3 , and the power X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) study shows a very similar framework of 1 to 2 and 3 . Both 1 and 2 are 3D porous structures made of Zn₃(COO)₆ secondary building units (SBUs) and 2,2′‐ or 3,3′‐dmbpy as pillar ligand. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and PXRD studies reveal high thermal and water stability for both compounds. Gas‐adsorption studies show that the reduction of surface area and pore volume by introducing a methyl group to the bpy ligand leads to a decrease in H₂ uptake for both compounds. However, CO₂ adsorption experiments with 1′ (guest‐free 1 ) indicate significant enhancement in CO₂ uptake, whereas for 2′ (guest‐free 2 ) the adsorbed amount is decreased. These results suggest that there are two opposing and competitive effects brought on by methyl functionalization: the enhancement due to increased isosteric heats of CO₂ adsorption (Q_st), and the detraction due to the reduction of surface area and pore volume. For 1′ , the enhancement effect dominates, which leads to a significantly higher uptake of CO₂ than its parent compound 3′ (guest‐free 3 ). For 2′ , the detraction effect predominates, thereby resulting in reduced CO₂ uptake relative to its parent structure 3′ . IR and Raman spectroscopic studies also present evidence for strong interaction between CO₂ and methyl‐functionalized π moieties. Furthermore, all compounds exhibit high separation capability for CO₂ over other small gases including CH₄, CO, N₂, and O₂.     

Syntheses and characterization of Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) complexes with 5-methyl-1-(2′-pyridyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide (MP y P z CA) ligand

From the reaction between Zn(II), Cd(II) and Hg(II) with 5-methyl-1-(2′-pyridyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide (MP _y P _z CA) in ethanol, the complexes [Zn(MP _y P _z CA)₂(NO₃)]⁺ [(NO₃)_0.60(ClO₄)_0.40]^?·H₂O, Cd(MP _y P _z CA)₂Cl₂ and Hg(MP _y P _z CA)(SCN)₂ were obtained. These compounds have been characterized by IR and CHN analyses. The structure of [Zn(MP _y P _z CA)₂NO₃]⁺[(NO₃)_0.60(ClO₄)_0.40]^?·H₂O has been solved by X-ray crystallography. The coordination environment around the Zn(II) may be described as a trigonal bipyramid in which the ligands are both bidentate, but coordinated differently. The coordination sphere is completed with the oxygen atom of a nitrate anion as a unidentate ligand.     

Bis{bis­[5‐tert‐butyl‐2‐oxido‐3‐(1‐pyridinio­methyl)­phenyl]­methane}­dioxouranium bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate) pyridine disolvate: a uranyl bis­(diphenoxide) complex resulting from homooxacalixarene cleavage

The title compound, [UO₂(C₃₃H₃₈N₂O₂)₂](CF₃SO₃)₂·2C₅H₅N, has been obtained by reaction of U^IV tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate with p‐tert‐butyl­tetrahomodioxacalix­[4]­arene in pyridine. The uranyl ion lies on an inversion centre and is bound to two O atoms from each diphenoxide ligand, which gives the usual square‐planar equatorial environment. The zwitterionic diphenoxide species results from nucleophilic attack by pyridine on the benzylic ether C atoms of the homooxacalixarene, assisted by initial U coordination to the ether groups, with subsequent metal oxidation giving the uranyl moiety.     

Two Heterometallic–Organic Frameworks Composed of Iron(III)‐Salen‐Based Ligands and d10 Metals: Gas Sorption and Visible‐Light Photocatalytic Degradation of 2‐Chlorophenol

Two examples of heterometallic–organic frameworks (HMOFs) composed of dicarboxyl‐functionalized Fe^III‐salen complexes and d¹⁰ metals (Zn, Cd), [Zn₂(Fe‐L)₂(μ₂‐O)(H₂O)₂] ? 4 DMF ? 4 H₂O ( 1 ) and [Cd₂(Fe‐L)₂(μ₂‐O)(H₂O)₂] ? 2 DMF ? H₂O ( 2 ) (H₄L=1,2‐cyclohexanediamino‐N,N′‐bis(3‐methyl‐5‐carboxysalicylidene), have been synthesized and structurally characterized. In 1 and 2 , each square‐pyramidal Fe^III atom is embedded in the [N₂O₂] pocket of an L^4? anion, and these units are further bridged by a μ₂‐O anion to give an (Fe‐L)₂(μ₂‐O) dimer. The two carboxylate groups of each L^4? anion bridge Zn^II or Cd^II atoms to afford a 3D porous HMOF. The gas sorption and magnetic properties of 1 and 2 have been studied. Remarkably, 1 and 2 show activity for the photocatalytic degradation of 2‐chlorophenol (2‐CP) under visible‐light irradiation, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first time that this has been observed for Fe^III‐salen‐based HMOFs.     

Influence of the Organic Species and Oxoanion in the Synthesis of two Uranyl Sulfate Hydrates, (H3O)2[(UO2)2(SO4)3­(H2O)]·7H2O and (H3O)2[(UO2)2(SO4)3(H2O)]·4H2O,and a Uranyl Selenate‐Selenite [C5H6N][(UO2)(SeO4)(HSeO3)]

Two uranyl sulfate hydrates, (H₃O)₂[(UO₂)₂(SO₄)₃(H₂O)] · 7H₂O (NDUS) and (H₃O)₂[(UO₂)₂(SO₄)₃(H₂O)] · 4H₂O (NDUS1), and one uranyl selenate‐selenite [C₅H₆N][(UO₂)(SeO₄)(HSeO₃)] (NDUSe), were obtained and their crystal structures solved. NDUS and NDUSe result from reactions in highly acidic media in the presence of L ‐cystine at 373 K. NDUS crystallized in a closed vial at 278 K after 5 days and NDUSe in an open beaker at 278 K after 2 weeks. NDUS1 was synthesized from aqueous solution at room temperature over the course of a month. NDUS, NDUS1, and NDUSe crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, a = 15.0249(4) Å,b = 9.9320(2) Å, c = 15.6518(4) Å, β = 112.778(1)°, V = 2153.52(9) ų,Z = 4, the tetragonal space group P4₃2₁2, a = 10.6111(2) Å,c = 31.644(1) Å, V = 3563.0(2) ų, Z = 8, and in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, a = 8.993(3) Å, b = 13.399(5) Å, c = 10.640(4) Å,β = 108.230(4)°, V = 1217.7(8) ų, Z = 4, respectively.The structural units of NDUS and NDUS1 are two‐dimensional uranyl sulfate sheets with a U/S ratio of 2/3. The structural unit of NDUSe is a two‐dimensional uranyl selenate‐selenite sheets with a U/Se ratio of 1/2. In‐situ reaction of the L ‐cystine ligands gives two distinct products for the different acids used here. Where sulfuric acid is used, only H₃O⁺ cations are located in the interlayer space, where they balance the charge of the sheets, whereas where selenic acid is used, interlayer C₅H₆N⁺ cations result from the cyclization of the carboxyl groups of L ‐cystine, balancing the charge of the sheets.     

Heterobinuclear and Heterotrinuclear complexes of Oxorhenium(V) with Cu(II), Ni(II), Fe(III), UO2(VI) and Th(IV) in the solid state

New heteronuclear complexes containing oxorhenium(V), Cu(II), Ni(II), Fe(III), UO₂(VI) and Th(IV) ions were prepared by the reaction of the complex ligand, [ReO(H₄L)Cl]Cl₂, where H₄L = 8,17-dimethyl-6,15-dioxo-5,7,14,16-tetrahydrodibenzo[a,h][14]annulene-2,11-dicarboxylic acid, with the previous transition and actinide salts. Three heteronuclear Cu(II) complexes were isolated depending on the ratio of [ReO(H₄L)Cl]Cl₂?:?Cu(II) ion. When the ratios were 1?:?0.5, 1?:?1 and 1?:?2, the heteronuclear complexes {[ReO(H₃L)Cl]₂CuCl₂(OH₂)₂}SO₄ · H₂O (I), [ReO(H₃L)Cl₂Cu(OH₂)₂(SO₄)] (II) and {ReO(H₂L)Cl[Cu(OH₂)₃ SO₄]₂} (III) were obtained, respectively. Heteronuclear complexes of the other metal cations were obtained by mixing [ReO(H₄L)Cl]Cl₂ with the metal salt in the ratio 1?:?1 to obtain the heteronuclear complexes [ReO(H₃L)Cl₂Ni(OH₂)₂](NO₃)₂ (IV), [ReO(H₃L)Cl₃Fe(OH₂)₃](NO₃)₂ (V), [ReO(H₃L)ClUO₂(NO₃)₂ (OH₂)]Cl (VI) and [ReO(H₃L)Cl₃Th(NO₃)₂(OH₂)]NO₃ · 2H₂O (VII). The complex ligand coordinates with the heterometal ion via the carboxylate group, and the infrared bands ν_as COO and ν_s COO indicate that the carboxylate acts as a unidentate ligand to the heterometal cations. Cu(II) and Fe(III) cations in the heteronuclear complexes have octahedral geometry, while Ni(II) is square planar. Thermal studies explored the possibility of obtaining new heteronuclear complexes pyrolytically in the solid state from the corresponding mother complexes. The structures of the complexes were elucidated by conductance, IR and electronic spectra, magnetic moments, ¹H NMR and TG-DSC measurements as well as by mass spectroscopy.     

Loss of methyl from [H2CC(OH)?CH3]+˙ ions prepared by electron impact ionization of unstable 2-hydroxypropene

Unstable 2-hydroxpropene was prepared by retro-Diels-Alder decomposition of 5-exo-methyl-5-norbornenol at 800°C/2 × 10^?6 Torr. The ionization energy of 2-hydroxypropene was measured as 8.67±0.05 eV. Formation of [C₂H₃O]⁺ and [CH₃]⁺ ions originating from different parts of the parent ion was examined by means of ¹³C and deuterium labelling. Threshold-energy [H₂C?C(OH)? CH₃]^+˙ ions decompose to CH₃CO⁺+CH₃^˙ with appearance energy AE(CH₃CO⁺) = 11.03 ± 0.03 eV. Higher energy ions also form CH₂?C?OH⁺ + CH₃ with appearance energy AE(CH₂?C?OH⁺) = 12.2–12.3 eV. The fragmentation competes with hydrogen migration between C(1) and C(3) in the parent ion. [C₂H₃O]⁺ ions containing the original methyl group and [CH₃]⁺ ions incorporating the former methylene and the hydroxyl hydrogen atom are formed preferentially, compared with their corresponding counterparts. This behaviour is due to rate-determining isomerization [H₂C?C(OH)? CH₃]^+˙ →[CH₃COCH₃]^+˙, followed by asymmetrical fragmentation of the latter ions. Effects of internal energy and isotope substitution are discussed.