UPPER BOUNDS ON THE LOWER OPEN PACKING NUMBER OF A TREE

Abstract

Let G be a graph and let v be a vertex of G. The open neigbourhood N(v) of v is the set of all vertices adjacent with v in G. An open packing of G is a set of vertices whose open neighbourhoods are pairwise disjoint. The lower open packing number of G, denoted ρ^° _L(G), is the minimum cardinality of a maximal open packing of G while the (upper) open packing number of G, denoted ρ^°(G), is the maximum cardinality among all open packings of G. It is known (see [7]) that if G is a connected graph of order n ≥3, then ρ^°(G) ≤ 2n/3 and this bound is sharp (even for trees). As a consequence of this result, we know that ρ^° _L(G) ≤ 2n/3. In this paper, we improve this bound when G is a tree. We show that if G is a tree of order n with radius 3, then ρ^° _L(G) ≤ n/2 + 2 √n-1, and this bound is sharp, while if G is a tree of order n with radius at least 4, then ρ^° _L(G) is bounded above by 2n/3—O√n).     

Complete subgraphs with large degree sums

Let t(n, k) denote the Turán number—the maximum number of edges in a graph on n vertices that does not contain a complete graph K_k+1. It is shown that if G is a graph on n vertices with n ≥ k²(k – 1)/4 and m < t(n, k) edges, then G contains a complete subgraph K_k such that the sum of the degrees of the vertices is at least 2km/n. This result is sharp in an asymptotic sense in that the sum of the degrees of the vertices of K_k is not in general larger, and if the number of edges in G is at most t(n, k) – ? (for an appropriate ?), then the conclusion is not in general true. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Non-traceability of large connected claw-free graphs

Let G be a connected claw-free graph on n vertices. Let ς₃(G) be the minimum degree sum among triples of independent vertices in G. It is proved that if ς₃(G) ≥ n − 3 then G is traceable or else G is one of graphs G_n each of which comprises three disjoint nontrivial complete graphs joined together by three additional edges which induce a triangle K₃. Moreover, it is shown that for any integer k ≥ 4 there exists a positive integer ν(k) such that if ς₃(G) ≥ n − k, n > ν(k) and G is non-traceable, then G is a factor of a graph G_n. Consequently, the problem HAMILTONIAN PATH restricted to claw-free graphs G = (V, E) (which is known to be NP-complete) has linear time complexity O(|E|) provided that ς₃(G) ≥ . This contrasts sharply with known results on NP-completeness among dense graphs. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 75–86, 1998     

On n-Hamiltonian line graphs

With each nonempty graph G one can associate a graph L(G), called the line graph of G, with the property that there exists a one-to-one correspondence between E(G) and V(L(G)) such that two vertices of L(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G are adjacent. For integers m ≥ 2, the mth iterated line graph L^m(G) of G is defined to be L(L^m-1(G)). A graph G of order p ≥ 3 is n-Hamiltonian, 0 ≤ n ≤ p ? 3, if the removal of any k vertices, 0 ≤ k ≤ n, results in a Hamiltonian graph. It is shown that if G is a connected graph with δ(G) ≥ 3, where δ(G) denotes the minimum degree of G, then L²(G) is (δ(G) ? 3)-Hamiltonian. Furthermore, if G is 2-connected and δ(G) ≥ 4, then L²(G) is (2δ(G) ? 4)-Hamiltonian. For a connected graph G which is neither a path, a cycle, nor the graph K(1, 3) and for any positive integer n, the existence of an integer k such that L^m(G) is n-Hamiltonian for every m ≥ k is exhibited. Then, for the special case n = 1, bounds on (and, in some cases, the exact value of) the smallest such integer k are determined for various classes of graphs.     

The Convexity Number of a Graph

 For two vertices u and v of a connected graph G, the set I[u,v] consists of all those vertices lying on a u−v shortest path in G, while for a set S of vertices of G, the set I[S] is the union of all sets I[u,v] for u,v∈S. A set S is convex if I[S]=S. The convexity number con(G) of G is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of G. The clique number ω(G) is the maximum cardinality of a clique in G. If G is a connected graph of order n that is not complete, then n≥3 and 2≤ω(G)≤con(G)≤n−1. It is shown that for every triple l,k,n of integers with n≥3 and 2≤l≤k≤n−1, there exists a noncomplete connected graph G of order n with ω(G)=l and con(G)=k. Other results on convex numbers are also presented. Received: August 19, 1998 Final version received: May 17, 2000     

The number of spanning trees in regular graphs

Let C(G) denote the number of spanning trees of a graph G. It is shown that there is a function ?(k) that tends to zero as k tends to infinity such that for every connected, k-regular simple graph G on n vertices C(G) = {k[1 ? δ(G)]}ⁿ. where 0 ≤ δ(G) ≤ ?(k).     

Large induced forests in sparse graphs

For a graph G, let a(G) denote the maximum size of a subset of vertices that induces a forest. Suppose that G is connected with n vertices, e edges, and maximum degree Δ. Our results include: (a) if Δ ≤ 3, and G ≠ K₄, then a(G) ≥ n ? e/4 ? 1/4 and this is sharp for all permissible e ≡ 3 (mod 4); and (b) if Δ ≥ 3, then a(G) ≥ α(G) + (n ? α(G))/(Δ ? 1)². Several problems remain open. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 38: 113–123, 2001     

On packing 3‐vertex paths in a graph

Let G be a connected graph and let eb(G) and λ(G) denote the number of end‐blocks and the maximum number of disjoint 3‐vertex paths Λ in G. We prove the following theorems on claw‐free graphs: (t1) if G is claw‐free and eb(G) ≤ 2 (and in particular, G is 2‐connected) then λ(G) = ⌊| V(G)|/3⌋; (t2) if G is claw‐free and eb(G) ≥ 2 then λ(G) ≥ ⌊(| V(G) | − eb(G) + 2)/3 ⌋; and (t3) if G is claw‐free and Δ^*‐free then λ(G) = ⌊| V(G) |/3⌋ (here Δ^* is a graph obtained from a triangle Δ by attaching to each vertex a new dangling edge). We also give the following sufficient condition for a graph to have a Λ‐factor: Let n and p be integers, 1 ≤ p ≤ n − 2, G a 2‐connected graph, and |V(G)| = 3n. Suppose that G − S has a Λ‐factor for every S ⊆ V(G) such that |S| = 3p and both V(G) − S and S induce connected subgraphs in G. Then G has a Λ‐factor. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 36: 175–197, 2001     

Total domination in 2‐connected graphs and in graphs with no induced 6‐cycles

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number γ_t(G) of G. It is known [J Graph Theory 35 (2000), 21–45] that if G is a connected graph of order n > 10 with minimum degree at least 2, then γ_t(G) ≤ 4n/7 and the (infinite family of) graphs of large order that achieve equality in this bound are characterized. In this article, we improve this upper bound of 4n/7 for 2‐connected graphs, as well as for connected graphs with no induced 6‐cycle. We prove that if G is a 2‐connected graph of order n > 18, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Our proof is an interplay between graph theory and transversals in hypergraphs. We also prove that if G is a connected graph of order n > 18 with minimum degree at least 2 and no induced 6‐cycle, then γ_t(G) ≤ 6n/11. Both bounds are shown to be sharp. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 55–79, 2009     

Distance-biregular graphs with 2-valent vertices and distance-regular line graphs

A graph G is called distance-regularized if each vertex of G admits an intersection array. It is known that every distance-regularized graph is either distance-regular (DR) or distance-biregular (DBR). Note that DBR means that the graph is bipartite and the vertices in the same color class have the same intersection array. A (k, g)-graph is a k-regular graph with girth g and with the minimum possible number of vertices consistent with these properties. Biggs proved that, if the line graph L(G) is distance-transitive, then G is either K_1,n or a (k, g)-graph. This result is generalized to DR graphs by showing that the following are equivalent: (1) L(G) is DR and G ≠ K_1,n for n ≥ 2, (2) G and L(G) are both DR, (3) subdivision graph S(G) is DBR, and (4) G is a (k, g)-graph. This result is used to show that a graph S is a DBR graph with 2-valent vertices iff S = K_2,′ or S is the subdivision graph of a (k, g)-graph. Let G⁽²⁾ be the graph with vertex set that of G and two vertices adjacent if at distance two in G. It is shown that for a DBR graph G, G⁽²⁾ is two DR graphs. It is proved that a DR graph H without triangles can be obtained as a component of G⁽²⁾ if and only if it is a (k, g)-graph with g ≥ 4.     

Induced Matching Extendable Graph Powers

A graph G is called induced matching extendable (shortly, IM-extendable) if every induced matching of G is included in a perfect matching of G. A graph G is called strongly IM-extendable if every spanning supergraph of G is IM-extendable. The k-th power of a graph G, denoted by G^k, is the graph with vertex set V(G) in which two vertices are adjacent if and only if the distance between them in G is at most k. We obtain the following two results which give positive answers to two conjectures of Yuan. Result 1. If a connected graph G with |V(G)| even is locally connected, then G² is strongly IM-extendable. Result 2. If G is a 2-connected graph with |V(G)| even, then G³ is strongly IM-extendable. Research Supported by NSFC Fund 10371102.     

On the Convexity Number of Graphs

A set of vertices S in a graph is convex if it contains all vertices which belong to shortest paths between vertices in S. The convexity number c(G) of a graph G is the maximum cardinality of a convex set of vertices which does not contain all vertices of G. We prove NP-completeness of the problem to decide for a given bipartite graph G and an integer k whether c(G) ≥ k. Furthermore, we identify natural necessary extension properties of graphs of small convexity number and study the interplay between these properties and upper bounds on the convexity number.     

On κ—ordered Graphs Involved Degree Sum

A graph G is κ-ordered Hamiltonian 2≤κ≤n,if for every ordered sequence S of κ distinct vertices of G,there exists a Hamiltonian cycle that encounters S in the given order,In this article,we prove that if G is a graph on n vertices with degree sum of nonadjacent vertices at least n 3κ-9/2,then G is κ-ordered Hamiltonian for κ=3,4,…,[n/19].We also show that the degree sum bound can be reduced to n 2[κ/2]-2 if κ(G）≥3κ-1/2 or δ（G）≥5κ-4.Several known results are generalized.     

Convexity in oriented graphs

For vertices u and v in an oriented graph D, the closed interval I[u,v] consists of u and v together with all vertices lying in a u−v geodesic or v−u geodesic in D. For S⊆V(D), I[S] is the union of all closed intervals I[u,v] with u,v∈S. A set S is convex if I[S]=S. The convexity number con(D) is the maximum cardinality of a proper convex set of V(D). The nontrivial connected oriented graphs of order n with convexity number n−1 are characterized. It is shown that there is no connected oriented graph of order at least 4 with convexity number 2 and that every pair k, n of integers with 1⩽k⩽n−1 and k≠2 is realizable as the convexity number and order, respectively, of some connected oriented graph. For a nontrivial connected graph G, the lower orientable convexity number con⁻(G) is the minimum convexity number among all orientations of G and the upper orientable convexity number con⁺(G) is the maximum such convexity number. It is shown that con⁺(G)=n−1 for every graph G of order n⩾2. The lower orientable convexity numbers of some well-known graphs are determined, with special attention given to outerplanar graphs.     

On the toughness index of planar graphs

The toughness indexτ(G) of a graph G is defined to be the largest integer t such that for any S ? V(G) with |S| > t, c(G - S) < |S| - t, where c(G - S) denotes the number of components of G - S. In particular, 1-tough graphs are exactly those graphs for which τ(G) ≥ 0. In this paper, it is shown that if G is a planar graph, then τ(G) ≥ 2 if and only if G is 4-connected. This result suggests that there may be a polynomial-time algorithm for determining whether a planar graph is 1-tough, even though the problem for general graphs is NP-hard. The result can be restated as follows: a planar graph is 4-connected if and only if it remains 1-tough whenever two vertices are removed. Hence it establishes a weakened version of a conjecture, due to M. D. Plummer, that removing 2 vertices from a 4-connected planar graph yields a Hamiltonian graph.     

On integral Cayley sum graphs

Let S be a subset of a finite abelian group G. The Cayley sum graph Cay⁺(G, S) of G with respect to S is a graph whose vertex set is G and two vertices g and h are joined by an edge if and only if g + h ∈ S. We call a finite abelian group G a Cayley sum integral group if for every subset S of G, Cay⁺(G, S) is integral i.e., all eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix are integers. In this paper, we prove that all Cayley sum integral groups are represented by Z₃ and Zn₂ ⁿ, n ≥ 1, where Z_k is the group of integers modulo k. Also, we classify simple connected cubic integral Cayley sum graphs.     

The Sigma Chromatic Number of a Graph

For a nontrivial connected graph G, let ${c: V(G)\to {{\mathbb N}}}For a nontrivial connected graph G, let c: V(G)? \mathbb N{c: V(G)\to {{\mathbb N}}} be a vertex coloring of G, where adjacent vertices may be colored the same. For a vertex v of G, let N(v) denote the set of vertices adjacent to v. The color sum σ(v) of v is the sum of the colors of the vertices in N(v). If σ(u) ≠ σ(v) for every two adjacent vertices u and v of G, then c is called a sigma coloring of G. The minimum number of colors required in a sigma coloring of a graph G is called its sigma chromatic number σ(G). The sigma chromatic number of a graph G never exceeds its chromatic number χ(G) and for every pair a, b of positive integers with a ≤ b, there exists a connected graph G with σ(G) = a and χ(G) = b. There is a connected graph G of order n with σ(G) = k for every pair k, n of positive integers with k ≤n if and only if k ≠ n − 1. Several other results concerning sigma chromatic numbers are presented.     

Partitioning a graph into convex sets

Let G be a finite simple graph. Let S⊆V(G), its closed interval I[S] is the set of all vertices lying on shortest paths between any pair of vertices of S. The set S is convex if I[S]=S. In this work we define the concept of a convex partition of graphs. If there exists a partition of V(G) into p convex sets we say that G is p-convex. We prove that it is NP-complete to decide whether a graph G is p-convex for a fixed integer p≥2. We show that every connected chordal graph is p-convex, for 1≤p≤n. We also establish conditions on n and k to decide if the k-th power of a cycle C_n is p-convex. Finally, we develop a linear-time algorithm to decide if a cograph is p-convex.     

Cyclability of 3‐connected graphs

A subset S of vertices of a graph G is called cyclable in G if there is in G some cycle containing all the vertices of S. We denote by α(S, G) the number of vertices of a maximum independent set of G[S]. We prove that if G is a 3‐connected graph or order n and if S is a subset of vertices such that the degree sum of any four independent vertices of S is at least n + 2α(S, G) −2, then S is cyclable. This result implies several known results on cyclability or Hamiltonicity. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 34: 191–203, 2000     

Relative length of long paths and cycles in graphs with large degree sums

For a graph G, p(G) denotes the order of a longest path in G and c(G) the order of a longest cycle. We show that if G is a connected graph n ≥ 3 vertices such that d(u) + d(v) + d(w) ≧ n for all triples u, v, w of independent vertices, then G satisfies c(G) ≥ p(G) – 1, or G is in one of six families of exceptional graphs. This generalizes results of Bondy and of Bauer, Morgana, Schmeichel, and Veldman. © 1995, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.