Application of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of three phthalate esters in water samples

A novel method, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-variable wavelength detector (HPLC-VWD), has been developed for the determination of three phthalate esters (dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), and di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP)) in water samples. A mixture of extraction solvent (41 μL carbon tetrachloride) and dispersive solvent (0.75 mL acetonitrile) were rapidly injected into 5.0 mL aqueous sample for the formation of cloudy solution, the analytes in the sample were extracted into the fine droplets of CCl₄. After extraction, phase separation was performed by centrifugation and the enriched analytes in the sedimented phase were determined by HPLC-VWD. Some important parameters, such as the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, extraction time and salt effect were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum extraction condition, the method yields a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 5 to 5000 ng mL⁻¹ for target analytes. The enrichment factors for DMP, DEP and DnBP were 45, 92 and 196, respectively, and the limits of detection were 1.8, 0.88 and 0.64 ng mL⁻¹, respectively. The relative standard deviations (R.S.D.) for the extraction of 10 ng mL⁻¹ of phthalate esters were in the range of 4.3-5.9% (n = 7). Lake water, tap water and bottled mineral water samples were successfully analyzed using the proposed method.     

Determination of phthalate esters in water samples by ionic liquid cold-induced aggregation dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography

A novel method, termed ionic liquid cold-induced aggregation dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (IL-CIA-DLLME), combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was developed for the determination of three phthalate esters in water samples. Several important parameters influencing the IL-CIA-DLLME extraction efficiency, such as the type of extraction and disperser solvent, the volume of extraction and disperser solvent, temperature, extraction time and salt effect, were investigated. Under optimal extraction conditions, the enrichment factors and extraction recoveries ranged from 174 to 212 and 69.9 to 84.8%, respectively. Excellent linearity with coefficients of correlation from 0.9968 to 0.9994 was observed in the concentration range of 2–100 ng mL⁻¹. The repeatability of the proposed method expressed as relative standard deviations ranged from 2.2 to 3.7% (n = 5). Limits of detection were between 0.68 and 1.36 ng mL⁻¹. Good relative recoveries for phthalate esters in tap, bottled mineral and river water samples were obtained in the ranges of 91.5–98.1%, 92.4–99.2% and 90.1–96.8%, respectively. Thus, the proposed method has excellent potential for the determination of phthalate esters in the environmental field.     

Determination of phthalate esters from environmental water samples by micro‐solid‐phase extraction using TiO2 nanotube arrays before high‐performance liquid chromatography

We describe a highly sensitive micro‐solid‐phase extraction method for the pre‐concentration of six phthalate esters utilizing a TiO₂ nanotube array coupled to high‐performance liquid chromatography with a variable‐wavelength ultraviolet visible detector. The selected phthalate esters included dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, butyl benzyl phthalate, bis(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalate and dioctyl phthalate. The factors that would affect the enrichment, such as desorption solvent, sample pH, salting‐out effect, extraction time and desorption time, were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the linear range of the proposed method was 0.3–200 μg/L. The limits of detection were 0.04–0.2 μg/L (S/N = 3). The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of six phthalate esters in water samples and satisfied spiked recoveries were achieved. These results indicated that the proposed method was appropriate for the determination of trace phthalate esters in environmental water samples.     

Utilization of homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction followed by HPLC-UV as a sensitive method for the extraction and determination of phthalate esters in environmental water samples

A simple and sensitive method for the extraction of four phthalate esters including dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) and di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) as well as their determination in water samples was developed using homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction (HLLE) and HPLC-UV. The extraction method is based on the phase separation phenomenon by the salt addition to the ternary solvent system. The extraction parameters such as type and volume of extracting and consolute solvent, concentration of salt, pH of sample and extraction time were optimized. Under the optimal conditions (extraction solvent: 100?µL CHCl₃; consolute solvent: 2.0?mL methanol; NaCl 15% (w/v) and pH of sample: 6.5) extraction recovery was in the range of 92–102%. Linearity was observed in the range of 0.5–300?µg?L^?1 for DEP and 0.6–300?µg?L^?1 for DMP, BBP and DBP. Correlation coefficients (r ²), limits of detection (LODs) and relative standard deviations (RSDs) were in the ranges of 0.9976–0.9993, 0.18–0.25 and 1.5–4.8%, respectively. The method was successfully applied for the preconcentration and determination of these phthalate esters in the several environmental water samples.     

Determination of phthalate esters in bottled water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with GC–MS

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method was developed for the determination of the amount of phthalate esters in bottled drinking water samples and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction samples were analyzed by GC–MS. Various experimental conditions influencing the extraction were optimized. Under the optimized conditions, very good linearity was observed for all analytes in a range between 0.05 and 150 μg/L with coefficient of determination (R²) between 0.995 and 0.999. The LODs based on S/N = 3 were 0.005–0.22 μg/L. The reproducibility of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction was evaluated. The RSDs were 1.3–5.2% (n = 3). The concentrations of phthalates were determined in bottled samples available in half shell. To understand the leaching profile of these phthalates from bottled water, bottles were exposed to direct sunlight during summer (temperature from 34–57°C) and sampled at different intervals. Result showed that the proposed dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction is suitable for rapid determination of phthalates in bottled water and di‐n‐butyl, butyl benzyl, and bis‐2‐ethylhexyl phthalate compounds leaching from bottles up to 36 h. Thereafter, degradation of phthalates was observed.     

超声辅助分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱测定水样中的4种邻苯二甲酸酯类增塑剂

建立了采用超声辅助分散液液微萃取技术结合高效液相色谱法(UA-DLLME-HPLC)对4种邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)进行富集、检测的方法,并成功应用于实际水样分析。实验中采用富集因子来评价萃取效率,考察并优化了影响萃取效率的主要因素,包括萃取剂类型和用量、分散剂类型和用量、超声时间、离子强度、萃取时间和pH值等。结果表明: 在最佳萃取条件下,该法对4种PAEs（邻苯二甲酸二甲酯、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯和邻苯二甲酸二正辛酯）具有较高的富集能力,富集因子分别为71、144、169和159;检出限分别为3.78、1.77、3.07和3.30 μg/L。对实验室自来水、某品牌矿泉水以及湖水分别加标50、200及500 μg/L的回收率为82.99%～114.47%,相对标准偏差为1.93%～8.31%。该法简便、快速、环保,可以用于测定实际水样中的PAEs类增塑剂。     

微滴液相微萃取技术用于气相色谱-质谱法测定食品中的酞酸酯

将一种新型、简单、快速、环境友好的萃取方法微滴液相微萃取(SDME)与气相色谱-质谱法结合用于快速分析食品中的几种酞酸酯(PAEs)。考察了萃取溶剂的种类及用量、微液滴在样品溶液中的深度、萃取时间及搅拌子的搅拌速度对微滴液相微萃取的影响。优化的萃取条件为:萃取溶剂为2.0 μL甲苯,微液滴在样品溶液中的深度为0.75 cm,搅拌速度为1000 r/min,萃取时间为20 min。该方法的线性范围为0.1～4000 μg/L,检测限为25 ng/L～0.8 mg/L,加标回收率为87.1%～114.4%,相对标准偏差为4.9%～11.6%。微滴液相微萃取所需的有机溶剂量很小,是一种快速、简单、安全、有效的水溶性样品的前处理方法。     

Liquid-liquid Microextraction Based on Solidification of Floating Organic Drops Coupled with Gas Chromatography for Analyzing Trace Benzene,Toluene and Xylene in Water Samples

A new liquid-liquid microextraction method based on the solidification of floating organic drops coupled with gas chromatography was developed for the determination of trace benzene, toluene and xylene(BTX) in water samples. In the microextraction procedure, a microdrop of n-decanol was delivered to the surface of the analytes’ solution, and stirred for a desired time. Following the absolute extraction, the sample vial was cooled in an ice bath for 10 min. The solidified n-decanol was then transferred into a plastic tube and melted naturally; and 1 μL of it was injected into gas chromatography for analysis. Factors relevant to the extraction efficiency were studied and optimized. The optimal experimental conditions were: 15 μL of n-decanol as extractive solvent, 30 mL of solution containing analytes, no salt, the stirring rate 400 r/min, the extraction temperature 30 °C, and the extraction time 30 min. Under those optimized conditions, the detection limit(LOD) of analytes was in a range of 0.05―0.10 ng/mL by the developed method. A good linearity(r>0.99) in a calibration range of 0.01―100 μg/mL was obtained. The recoveries of the real samples at different spiked levels of BTX were in the range from 92.2% to 103.4%.     

磁性多壁碳纳米管固相萃取-气相色谱-质谱法检测水样中的13种邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物

建立了磁性多壁碳纳米管(MWCNTs)固相萃取结合气相色谱-质谱检测水样中13种邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物(PAEs)的方法。优化了萃取时间、水样pH值、解吸溶剂的种类和用量、解吸时间等影响萃取效率的主要条件。最终确定萃取时间为10 min,水样pH 5～7,解吸溶剂为2 mL丙酮,解吸时间为5 min。在优化的条件下,各组分的萃取回收率为89.7%～100.5%。方法具有较高的灵敏度,检出限(信噪比(S/N)为3)为0.08～0.47 μg/L。3种实际样品的加标回收率为84.5%～107.5%,相对标准偏差为1.9%～12.8%。该方法操作简便、省时,准确、灵敏、环保,可用于水样中PAEs的检测,并成功地应用于自来水、瓶装饮用水和湖水样品的分析,13种PAEs均未检出。     

Development of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry as a simple, rapid and highly sensitive method for the determination of phthalate esters in water samples

A simple, rapid and efficient method, the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), has been developed for the extraction and determination of phthalate esters (dimethyl phthalate, diallyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate, benzyl butyl phthalate, dicyclohexyl phthalate and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate) in water samples. Factors relevant to the microextraction efficiency, such as the kind of extraction, the disperser solvent and their volume, the salt effect and the extraction time were investigated and optimized. Under the optimized extraction conditions (extraction solvent: chlorobenzene, volume, 9.5microL; disperser solvent: acetone, volume, 0.50mL, without salt addition and extraction time below 5s), the figures of merit of the proposed method were evaluated. The values of the detection limit of the method were in the range of 0.002-0.008microgL(-1), while the RSD% value for the analysis of 1microgL(-1) of the analytes was below 6.8% (n=4). A good linearity (0.9962>/=r(2)>/=0.9901) and a broad linear range (0.02-100microgL(-1)) were obtained. The method exhibited enrichment factors and recoveries, ranging from 681 to 889 and 68.1 to 88.9%, respectively, at room temperature (25+/-1 degrees C). Finally, the proposed method was successfully utilized for the preconcentration and determination of the phthalate esters in different real water samples and satisfactory results were obtained.     

Low‐density solvent‐based vortex‐assisted surfactant‐enhanced emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction and its application

For the first time, the low‐density solvent‐based vortex‐assisted surfactant‐enhanced emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction, followed by GC‐flame photometric detection has been developed for the determination of eight organophosphorus pesticides in aqueous samples. A small volume of organic extraction solvent (toluene) was dispersed into the aqueous samples by the assistance of surfactant and vortex agitator. The extraction was performed in a special disposable polyethylene pipette, allowing using the reagents with lower density than water as extraction solvents. The influence parameters were systemically investigated and optimized: toluene (30 μL) and Triton X‐100 (0.2 mmol/L) were used as the extraction solvent and the surfactant, respectively, and the extraction was performed for 1 min under room temperature without adding sodium chloride. Under the optimum conditions, the validation parameters such as the RSD (n = 6; 2.1–11.3%), LOD (0.005 and 0.05 μg/L), and linear range (0.1–50.0 μg/L with correlation coefficients (0.9958–0.9992) showed the method was satisfying. The proposed method has been successfully applied to the determination of the organophosphorus pesticides in real samples with recoveries between 82.8 and 100.2%.     

Centrifugeless ultrasound‐assisted emulsification microextraction based on salting‐out phenomenon followed by high‐performance liquid chromatography for the simple determination of phthalate esters in aqueous samples

A fast, sensitive, and centrifugeless ultrasound‐assisted emulsification microextraction followed by a high‐performance liquid chromatography method is developed for the determination of some phthalate esters in aqueous samples. In this method, a simple approach is followed to eliminate the centrifugation step in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using an organic solvent whose melting point is near the ambient temperature, consumption of the extracting solvent is efficiently reduced, and the overall extraction time was found to be only 7 min. The variables affecting the method are optimized. Under the optimal experimental conditions (75 μL of 1‐undecanol, a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min, and an ultrasound irradiation of 1 min), the proposed method exhibits good preconcentration factors (52–97), low limits of detection (1.0–5.0 ng/mL), and linearities in the range of 5–1500 ng/mL (r ² ≥ 0.995). Finally, the method is successfully applied to the analysis of phthalate esters in the drinking and river water samples. To study the probable release of the phthalate esters from a polyethylene container into boiling water, the boiling water exposed to the polyethylene container was analyzed by the proposed method.     

超声辅助低密度溶剂分散液液微萃取-气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法检测生物样品中的8种毒品

建立了生物样品中8种毒品的超声辅助分散液液微萃取-气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱检测方法,采用密度比水低的有机溶剂甲苯作为萃取溶剂,萃取过程中不需要任何分散剂。对影响萃取富集效率的因素进行优化:将100 μL甲苯萃取剂加入到1 mL样品溶液中,超声波剧烈振荡使甲苯充分分散到样品溶液中进行萃取,离心分层后,抽取上层萃取剂供气相色谱-三重四极杆串联质谱分析检测。在优化条件下,分析物在各自的线性范围内具有良好的线性关系,线性相关系数在0.9984~0.9994之间;检出限为0.05~0.40 μg/L (S/N=3);样品加标回收率在79.3%~100.3%之间,RSD<5.7%。本方法具有操作简单、灵敏度高和重现性好等优点,可应用于生物样品中多种毒品的分析检测。     

Screening method for phthalate esters in water using liquid-phase microextraction based on the solidification of a floating organic microdrop combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A simple and efficient liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) technique was developed using directly suspended organic microdrop coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), for the extraction and the determination of phthalate esters (dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, diallyl phthalate, di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), dicyclohexyl phthalate and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP)) in water samples. Microextraction efficiency factors, such as nature and volume of the organic solvent, temperature, salt effect, stirring rate and the extraction time were investigated and optimized. Under the optimized extraction conditions (extraction solvent: 1-dodecanol; extraction temperature: 60 °C; microdrop volume: 7 μL; stirring rate: 750 rpm, without salt addition and extraction time: 25 min), figures of merit of the proposed method were evaluated. The values of the detection limit were in the range of 0.02–0.05 μg L⁻¹, while the R.S.D.% value for the analysis of 5.0 μg L⁻¹ of the analytes was below 7.7% (n = 4). A good linearity (r² ≥ 0.9940) and a broad linear range (0.05–100 μg L⁻¹) were obtained. The method exhibited enrichment factor values ranging from 307 to 412. Finally, the designed method was successfully applied for the preconcentration and determination of the studied phthalate esters in different real water samples and satisfactory results were attained.     

多功能离子液体分散液液微萃取结合高效液相色谱法检测人尿中5种邻苯二甲酸酯代谢物

将多功能离子液体与分散液液微萃取（DLLME）技术相结合，建立了测定尿液中5种邻苯二甲酸酯类（PAEs）物质代谢产物的高灵敏度新方法。对影响DLLME效率的各单因素进行了优化，包括萃取剂的种类及体积、分散剂的种类及体积、萃取温度、超声时间、冷却时间、离心时间和盐效应等条件，经过严格的优化，最佳的萃取条件分别为：萃取剂[C₈MIM]PF₆]35 μL，分散剂[BSO₃HMIm]OTf]30 μL和[C₄MIM]BF₆]120 μL，萃取温度为35℃，超声时间5 min，冷却时间5 min，离心时间5 min，盐析剂NH₄PF₆ 0.1 g。在最佳的萃取条件下，5种PAEs代谢物在0.5~1000 μg/L范围内具有良好的线性关系，决定系数（R²）均大于0.9955，方法检出限为0.16~0.19 μg/L，尿液中添加低中高水平（5、20、100 μg/L）的PAEs代谢物，其回收率为92.9%~105.0%，日内精密度及日间精密度的相对标准偏差（RSD）均小于5.96%，方法学验证各指标及稳定性均符合分析要求。对所采集的10份糖尿病患者的尿液进行检测，并对该人群PAEs代谢物的暴露水平进行评价。结果表明，各PAEs代谢物均有检出，其中邻苯二甲酸单（2-乙基己基）酯（MEHP）的检出率为100%。总之，该方法萃取过程中未添加有毒的有机试剂，均使用多功能离子液体作为萃取剂、分散剂和盐析剂，萃取过程绿色环保，简单高效；方法的灵敏度较高，稳定性较好，适用于人体尿液中痕量PAEs代谢物的检测。     

LC Determination of Phthalate Esters in Water Samples Using Continuous-Flow Microextraction

A novel method, continuous-flow microextraction (CFME) combined with liquid chromatography (LC) with variable-wavelength detector (VWD), has been developed for the determination of three phthalate esters (dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), and di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP)) in water samples. Experimental parameters including extraction solvent, solvent drop volume, flow rate of sample solution, extraction time and ionic strength, which affected the extraction efficiency, were studied and optimized. Under the optimum extraction conditions, the method yields a linear calibration curve in the concentration range of 10–10,000 ng mL^?1 for target analytes. The enrichment factors of this method for DMP, DEP and DnBP reached at 27, 44 and 20, respectively, and the detection limits were 2, 1 and 5 ng mL^?1, respectively. Good repeatability of extraction was obtained with relative standard deviations below 8.6%. The results demonstrated that CFME followed by LC-VWD is a simple and reliable technique for the determination of phthalate esters in water samples.     

Molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction coupled with HPLC for the selective determination of monobutyl phthalate in bottled water

A molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) was prepared using monobutyl phthalate as template. The synthesis was optimized by using different porogens and functional monomers. The MIP was used as a selective sorbent in molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction (MIP-SPE) for pre-concentration and determination of monobutyl phthalate (mBP) from the bottled water. The difference in recognition selectivity of the polymer columns was observed in HPLC system, and the effect of the mobile phase on the performance of MIP columns was also investigated. Control of the MIP-SPE process is seen as important in helping to facilitate the selective extraction of mBP from water samples. Thereafter, the choice of washing solvent, eluting solvent amount, pH of loading sample, flow rate of loading solution and the loading sample volume was presented. The optimized procedure was described as follows: 25 mL spiked aqueous solution was percolated through the MIP-SPE cartridge at the flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. After rinsing with acetonitrile/methanol mixture (1:1, v/v), the bound analyte was desorbed with 3 mL methanol. The developed MIP-SPE method was demonstrated to be applicable for the analysis of mBP in the bottled water.     

气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法同时测定生脉饮中17种邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物的残留量

建立了气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱（GC-QQQ MS）同时测定生脉饮中17种邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物（PAE）残留量的方法。样品经正己烷振摇提取后进行检测。采用Agilent HP-5MS毛细管色谱柱（30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm）在程序升温条件下进行色谱分离;质谱以电子轰击（EI）为电离方式,采用多反应监测（MRM）模式进行监测。实验结果表明：17种PAE在0.5~20 mg/L范围内呈线性关系,r均大于0.99;平均加标回收率除邻苯二甲酸二甲酯（DMP）为51.9%、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯（DEP）为77.2%外,其余15种为91.8%~117.2%,RSD（n=6）为0.5%~5.4%。该方法操作简便,准确可靠,灵敏度高,专属性强,可用于生脉饮中邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物残留量的检测,以控制生脉饮的用药安全。     

基于杯［6］芳烃萃取头的固相微萃取-气相色谱法测定啤酒中痕量的酞酸酯类化合物

选用自制杯［6］芳烃溶胶-凝胶固相微萃取(SPME)萃取头,建立了顶空SPME与气相色谱联用检测啤酒中8种酞酸酯(PAEs)的方法。采用L25(56)正交设计对萃取条件进行了优化,所得方法检出限为0.003～3.429 μg/L,相对标准偏差不超过13.5%,加标回收率为86.3%～109.3%。采用标准加入法对3种瓶装啤酒中PAEs进行了检测,结果表明邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己)酯(DEHP)是啤酒中最主要的酞酸酯类污染物,含量最高达5.24 μg/L。迁移试验表明,瓶装啤酒所用塑料垫圈中高含量的DEHP可能成为酒体中PAEs的一种来源,且延长贮存时间、提高贮存温度和振荡都能加快垫圈中DEHP的迁移。     

Determination of phthalate esters in liquor samples by vortex‐assisted surfactant‐enhanced‐emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction followed by GC–MS

A novel method using vortex‐assisted surfactant‐enhanced‐emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction has been developed for the extraction of phthalate esters (PAEs) in Chinese liquor samples prior to analysis by GC–MS. In the proposed method, a high‐density extraction solvent (carbon tetrachloride) was dispersed into samples with the aid of a surfactant (Triton X‐100) and vortex agitation, resulting in a short extraction equilibrium (30 s). After centrifugation, a single microdrop of solvent was easily collected for GC–MS analysis. Key factors that affected the extraction efficiency were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, linearity was found in the range from 0.05 to 50 μg/L. Coefficients of determination varied from 0.9938 to 0.9971. LODs, based on an S/N of 3, ranged from 4.9 to 13 ng/L. Enrichment factors varied from 140 to 184. Reproducibility and recoveries were assessed by testing a series of three liquor samples that were spiked with different concentration levels. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of PAEs in 16 Chinese liquor samples. In this work, high‐density‐solvent vortex‐assisted surfactant‐enhanced‐emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction was applied for the first time for the extraction of PAEs in Chinese liquor samples and was proved to be simple, rapid, and sensitive.