Crossed products and blocks with normal defect groups

Abstract

Let D be an integral domain. A multiplicative set S of D is an almost splitting set if for each 0 ≠ d ∈ D, there exists an n = n(d) with d ⁿ  = st where s ∈ S and t is v-coprime to each element of S. An integral domain D is an almost GCD (AGCD) domain if for every x, y ∈ D, there exists a positive integer n = n(x, y) such that x ⁿ D ∩ y ⁿ D is a principal ideal. We prove that the polynomial ring D[X] is an AGCD domain if and only if D is an AGCD domain and D[X] ? D′[X] is a root extension, where D′ is the integral closure of D. We also show that D + XD _S [X] is an AGCD domain if and only if D and D _S [X] are AGCD domains and S is an almost splitting set.     

Almost Prüfer v-Multiplication Domains and Related Domains of the Form D + D S [Γ*]

Let D be an integral domain, S be a (saturated) multiplicative subset of D such that D ? D _S , Γ be a numerical semigroup with Γ ? ?₀, Γ* = Γ?{0}, X be an indeterminate over D, D + XD _S [X] = {a + Xg ∈ D _S [X]∣a ∈ D and g ∈ D _S [X]}, and D + D _S [Γ*] = {a + f ∈ D _S [Γ]∣a ∈ D and f ∈ D _S [Γ*]}; so D + D _S [Γ*] ? D + XD _S [X]. In this article, we study when D + D _S [Γ*] is an APvMD, an AGCD-domain, an AS-domain, an AP-domain, or an AB-domain.     

Almost splitting sets in integral domains, II

Let D be an integral domain. A saturated multiplicative subset S of D is an almost splitting set if, for each 0≠d∈D, there exists a positive integer n=n(d) such that dⁿ=st for some s∈S and t∈D which is v-coprime to each element of S. We show that every upper to zero in D[X] contains a primary element if and only if D?{0} is an almost splitting set in D[X], if and only if D is a UMT-domain and Cl(D[X]) is torsion. We also prove that D[X] is an almost GCD-domain if and only if D is an almost GCD-domain and Cl(D[X]) is torsion. Using this result, we construct an integral domain D such that Cl(D) is torsion, but Cl(D[X]) is not torsion.     

Pseudo-Almost Integral Elements

Let D be an integral domain with quotient field K. We define an element α ∈ K to be pseudo-almost integral over D if there is an infinite increasing sequence {s _i } of natural numbers and a nonzero c ∈ D with cα ^{s _i}  ∈ D. We investigate when a pseudo-almost integral element is almost integral or integral. We also determine the sequences {s _i } with the property that for any domain D and α ∈ K, whenever cα ^{s _i}  ∈ D for some nonzero c ∈ D, than α is actually almost integral over D.     

Ascending Nets of Prüfer V-Multiplication Domains

Abstract

Let D be an integral domain, S ? D a multiplicative set such that aD _S  ∩ D is a principal ideal for each a ∈ D and let D ^(S) = ? _s∈S D[X/s]. It is known that if D is a Prüfer v-multiplication domain (resp., generalized GCD domain, GCD domain), then so is D ^(S) respectively. When D is a Noetherian domain, we obtain a similar result for the power series analog D ^((S)) = ? _s∈S D[[X/s]] of D ^(S). Our approach takes care simultaneously of both cases D ^(S) and D ^((S)).     

On Restricted Leibniz Algebras

ABSTRACT

The role played by fields in relation to Galois Rings corresponds to semifields if the associativity is dropped, that is, if we consider Generalized Galois Rings instead of (associative) Galois rings. If S is a Galois ring and pS is the set of zero divisors in S, S* = S\ pS is known to be a finite {multiplicative} Abelian group that is cyclic if, and only if, S is a finite field, or S = ?/n? with n = 4 or n = p ^r for some odd prime p. Without associativity, S* is not a group, but a loop. The question of when this loop can be generated by a single element is addressed in this article.     

Domain and Range Operations in Semigroups and Rings

A D-semigroup S is a semigroup equipped with an operation D satisfying laws asserting that for a ∈ S, D(a) is the smallest e in some set of idempotents U ? S for which ea = a. D-semigroups correspond to left-reduced U-semiabundant semigroups. The basic properties and many examples of D-semigroups are given. Also considered are D-rings, whose multiplicative semigroup is a D-semigroup. Rickart *-rings provide important examples, and the most general D-rings for which the elements of the form D(a) constitute a lattice under the same meet and join operations as for Rickart *-rings are described.     

GCD-Sets in Integral Domains. II

Abstract

Let D be an integral domain and S ≠ U(D) a saturated multiplicative subset of D. We say that S is a GCD-set (resp., factorial-set) if S is a GCD-monoid (resp., factorial-monoid) under the product of D and that S is a Marot-set if every integral ideal of D intersecting S is generated by a set of elements in S. In this paper, we study Marot GCD-sets and Marot factorial-sets.     

Embedding Semigroups with Associate Subgroups into Semidirect Products

A semigroup S is said to have an associate subgroup G if, for each s ∈ S, there is a unique s* ∈ G such that ss*s = s. If the identity 1 _G of G is medial, i.e., c1 _G c = c holds for each c being a product of idempotents, we show that S is isomorphic to a certain subsemigroup of a semidirect product of an idempotent generated semigroup C by G. If additionally S is orthodox, we may choose C to be a band, belonging to the band variety, generated by the band of idempotents of S.     

Numerical Semigroup Rings and Almost Prüfer v-Multiplication Domains

Let D be an integral domain with quotient field K, X be an indeterminate over D, Γ be a numerical semigroup with Γ ? ?₀, D[Γ] be the semigroup ring of Γ over D (and hence D ? D[Γ] ? D[X]), and D + X ⁿ K[X] = {a + X ⁿ g∣a ∈ D and g ∈ K[X]}. We show that there exists an order-preserving bijection between Spec(D[X]) and Spec(D[Γ]), which also preserves t-ideals. We also prove that D[Γ] is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain) if and only if D[X] is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain) and char(D) ≠ 0. We show that if n ≥ 2, then D is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain, AGGCD-domain, AP-domain, AB-domain) and char(D) ≠ 0 if and only if D + X ⁿ K[X] is an APvMD (resp., AGCD-domain, AGGCD-domain, AP-domain, AB-domain). Finally, we give some examples of APvMDs which are not AGCD-domains by using the constructions D[Γ] and D + X ⁿ K[X].     

Power Values of Derivations with Annihilator Conditions on Lie Ideals in Prime Rings

Let R be a prime ring of char R ≠ 2, d a nonzero derivation of R, U a noncentral Lie ideal of R, and a ∈ R. If au ^{n ₁} d(u) ^{n ₂} u ^{n ₃} d(u) ^{n ₄} u ^{n ₅} … d(u) ^{n _k?1} u ^{n _k}  = 0 for all u ∈ U, where n ₁, n ₂,…,n _k are fixed non-negative integers not all zero, then a = 0 and if a(u ^s d(u)u ^t ) ⁿ  ∈ Z(R) for all u ∈ U, where s ≥ 0, t ≥ 0, n ≥ 1 are some fixed integers, then either a = 0 or R satisfies S ₄, the standard identity in four variables.     

Characterizations of *-Cancellation Ideals of an Integral Domain

Let D be an integral domain and * a star-operation on D. For a nonzero ideal I of D, let I ^{* _f} = ?{J* | (0) ≠ J ? I is finitely generated} and I ^{* _w} = ? _{P∈* f -Max(D)} ID _P . A nonzero ideal I of D is called a *-cancellation ideal if (IA)* = (IB)* for nonzero ideals A and B of D implies A* =B*. Let X be an indeterminate over D and N _* = {f ∈ D[X] | (c(f))* =D}. We show that I is a * _w -cancellation ideal if and only if I is * _f -locally principal, if and only if ID[X] _{N *} is a cancellation ideal. As a corollary, we have that each nonzero ideal of D is a * _w -cancellation ideal if and only if D _P is a principal ideal domain for all P ∈ * _f -Max(D), if and only if D[X] _{N *} is an almost Dedekind domain. We also show that if I is a * _w -cancellation ideal of D, then I ^{* _w}  = I ^{* _f}  = I _t , and I is * _w -invertible if and only if I ^{* _w}  = J _v for a nonzero finitely generated ideal J of D.     

Divisibility Graph for Symmetric and Alternating Groups

Let X be a nonempty set of positive integers and X* = X?{1}. The divisibility graph D(X) has X* as the vertex set, and there is an edge connecting a and b with a, b ∈ X* whenever a divides b or b divides a. Let X = cs(G) be the set of conjugacy class sizes of a group G. In this case, we denote D(cs(G)) by D(G). In this paper, we will find the number of connected components of D(G) where G is the symmetric group S _n or is the alternating group A _n .     

The Nakayama Property of a Module and Related Concepts

Three related properties of a module are investigated in this article, namely the Nakayama property, the Maximal property, and the S-property. A module M has the Nakayama property if 𝔞M = M for an ideal 𝔞 implies that sM = 0 for some s ∈ 𝔞 + 1. A module M has the Maximal property if there is in M a maximal proper submodule, and finally, M is said to have the S-property if S ^?1 M = 0 for a multiplicatively closed set S implies that sM = 0 for some s ∈ S.     

A Criterion for the Triviality of G(D) and Its Applications to the Multiplicative Structure of D

Let D be an F-central division algebra of index n. Here we present a criterion for the triviality of the group G(D) = D*/Nrd _D/F (D*)D′ and thus generalizing various related results published recently. To be more precise, it is shown that G(D) = 1 if and only if SK ₁(D) = 1 and F ^*2 = F ^*2n . Using this, we investigate the role of some particular subgroups of D* in the algebraic structure of D. In this direction, it is proved that a division algebra D of prime index is a symbol algebra if and only if D* contains a non-abelian nilpotent subgroup. More applications of this criterion including the computation of G(D) and the structure of maximal subgroups of D* are also investigated     

On Some Monogenic Semigroups with an Associate Subgroup

Let S be any semigroup and a, s ∈ S. If a = asa, then s is an associate of a. A subgroup G of S is an associate subgroup of S if every a ∈ S has a unique associate a* in G. It turns out that G = H _z for some idempotent z, the zenith of S. The mapping a → a* is a unary operation on S. We say that S is monogenic if S is generated, as a unary semigroup, by a single element.

We embark upon the problem of the structure of monogenic semigroups in this sense by characterizing monogenic ones belonging to completely simple semigroups, normal cryptogroups, orthogroups, combinatorial semigroups, cryptic medial semigroups, cryptic orthodox semigroups, and orthodox monoids. In each of these cases, except one, we construct a free object. The general problem remains open.     

S-Noetherian Properties of Composite Ring Extensions

Let R be a commutative ring with identity and S a multiplicative subset of R. We say that R is an S-Noetherian ring if for each ideal I of R, there exist an s ∈ S and a finitely generated ideal J of R such that sI ? J ? I. In this article, we study transfers of S-Noetherian property to the composite semigroup ring and the composite generalized power series ring.     

Inverse Problems for Time-Dependent Singular Heat Conductivities: Multi-Dimensional Case

We consider an inverse boundary value problem for the heat equation ? _t u = div (γ? _x u) in (0, T) × Ω, u = f on (0, T) × ?Ω, u| _t=0 = u ₀, in a bounded domain Ω ? ? ⁿ , n ≥ 2, where the heat conductivity γ(t, x) is piecewise constant and the surface of discontinuity depends on time: γ(t, x) = k ² (x ∈ D(t)), γ(t, x) = 1 (x ∈ Ω?D(t)). Fix a direction e* ∈ 𝕊 ^n?1 arbitrarily. Assuming that ?D(t) is strictly convex for 0 ≤ t ≤ T, we show that k and sup {e*·x; x ∈ D(t)} (0 ≤ t ≤ T), in particular D(t) itself, are determined from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map : f → ?_ν u(t, x)|_{(0, T)×?Ω}. The knowledge of the initial data u ₀ is not used in the proof. If we know min_0≤t≤T (sup _x∈D(t) x·e*), we have the same conclusion from the local Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. Numerical examples of stationary and moving circles inside the unit disk are shown. The results have applications to nondestructive testing. Consider a physical body consisting of homogeneous material with constant heat conductivity except for a moving inclusion with different conductivity. Then the location and shape of the inclusion can be monitored from temperature and heat flux measurements performed at the boundary of the body. Such a situation appears for example in blast furnaces used in ironmaking.     

On the sum of the total domination numbers of a digraph and its converse

A vertex subset S of a digraph D is called a dominating set of D if every vertex not in S has an in-neighbor in S. A dominating set S of D is called a total dominating set of D if the subdigraph induced by S has no isolated vertices. The total domination number of D, denoted by γt(D), is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of D. We show that for any connected digraph D of order n≥3, γt(D)+γt(D^? )≤5n/3, where D? is the converse of D. Furthermore, we characterize the oriented trees for which the equality holds.     

On Almost Unit-Regular Rings

An element a ∈ R is unit-regular provided that there exists an invertible u ∈ R such that a = aua. A ring R is called an almost unit-regular ring provided that for any a ∈ R, either a or 1 ? a is unit-regular. We characterize, in this article, the almost unit-regularity of Morita contexts with zero pairings. We also show that a ring R is unit-regular if and only if M ₂(R) is almost unit-regular. Various examples of such rings are constructed by means of formal triangular matrix rings.