Probing the Crystal Structure Landscape by Doping: 4‐Bromo, 4‐Chloro,and 4‐Methylcinnamic Acids

Accessing the data points in the crystal structure landscape of a molecule is a challenging task, either experimentally or computationally. We have charted the crystal structure landscape of 4‐bromocinnamic acid (4BCA) experimentally and computationally: experimental doping is achieved with 4‐methylcinnamic acid (4MCA) to obtain new crystal structures; computational doping is performed with 4‐chlorocinnamic acid (4CCA) as a model system, because of the difficulties associated in parameterizing the Br atom. The landscape of 4CCA is explored experimentally in turn, also by doping it with 4MCA, and is found to bear a close resemblance to the landscape of 4BCA, justifying the ready miscibility of these two halogenated cinnamic acids to form solid solutions without any change in crystal structure. In effect, 4MCA, 4CCA and 4BCA form a commutable group of crystal structures, which may be realized experimentally or computationally, and constitute the landscape. Unlike the results obtained by Kitaigorodskii, all but two of the multiple solid solutions obtained in the methyl‐doping experiments take structures that are different from the hitherto observed crystal forms of the parent compounds. Even granted that the latter might be inherently polymorphic, this unusual observation provokes the suggestion that solid solution formation may be used to probe the crystal structure landscape. The influence of π⋅⋅⋅π interactions, weak hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds in directing the formation of these new structures is also seen.     

具有U构型的二{1-甲硫基-1-[1-苯基-1-(1-苯基-3-甲基-5-氧代-4,5二氢吡唑-4-烯)-甲氨基]亚氨甲基}二硫醚的晶体结构

The reaction of 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-5-one (PMBP) and methyldithiocarbazate (mdtc) in methanol results in formation of a yellow crystalline solid, adduct of 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4benzoyl-2,5-dihydro-lH-pyrazol-5-one and methyldithiocarbazate. When the yellow solids were dissolved in a mixture of methanol and ether (1:4), a red crystal, which is an oxidation product of the former, was obtained by allowing solvent to evaporate for a few days at room temperature. The X-ray analysis of the red crystal indicates that it is a novel disulfide with a special structure like a “U” conformation in the solid state.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Hydrolysis of a Novel Anhydrogalactosucrose: 2′‐Methoxyl‐O‐1′,4′:3′,6′‐dianhydro‐β‐D‐fructofuranosyl 3,6‐anhydro‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐D‐galactopyranoside

A novel anhydrogalactosucrose derivative 2′‐methoxyl‐O‐1′,4′:3′,6′‐dianhydro‐β‐D‐fructofuranosyl 3,6‐anhydro‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐D‐galactopyranoside ( 4 ) was prepared from 3,6:1′,4′:3′,6′‐trianhydro‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐galactosucrose ( 3 ) via a facile method and characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and 2D NMR spectra. The single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that the title molecule forms a two thee‐dimensional network structure by two kinds of hydrogen bond interactions [O(2) H(2)···O(7), O(5) H(5)···O(8)]. Its stability was investigated by acid hydrolysis reaction treated with sulfuric acid, together with the formation of 1,6‐Di‐O‐methoxy‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐β‐D‐galactopyranose ( 5 ) and 2,2‐Di‐C‐methoxy‐1,4:3,6‐dianhydromannitol ( 6 ). According to the result, the relative stability of the ether bonds in the structure is in the order: C(1) O C(5)≈C(3′) O C(6′)≈C(1′) O C(4′)>C(3) O C(6)≈C(1) O C(2′)>C(2′) O C(5′).     

Synthesis,structural analysis,spectral investigations,and DFT calculations of 1‐(3‐amino‐4‐thia‐1,2‐diazaspiro[4.11]hexadec‐2‐en‐1‐yl)ethan‐1‐one

1‐(3‐amino‐4‐thia‐1,2‐diazaspiro[4.11]hexadec‐2‐en‐1‐yl)ethan‐1‐one was synthesized and experimentally characterized by using FT‐IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and UV–Vis spectroscopy. The structure of the compound was confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In the crystal structure, the molecules are linked by pairs of N‐H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming centrosymmetric dimers with the graph‐set motif. The water molecule also plays an important role in the stabilization of the crystal structure, bridging the dimers to form a two‐dimensional supramolecular network. The molecular geometry, frontier molecular orbitals, vibrational frequencies, electronic properties, and molecular electrostatic potential were calculated using density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP/6‐311G(d,p) basis set. Geometric parameters, vibrational assignments, and electronic properties such as calculated energies, excitation energies, and oscillator strengths were compared with the experimental data, and it was seen that the theoretical results support the experimental parameters.     

Conformational study of (Z)‐5‐(4‐chlorobenzylidene)‐2‐[4‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)piperazin‐1‐yl]‐3H‐imidazol‐4(5H)‐one in different environments: insight into the structural properties of bacterial efflux pump inhibitors

The 2‐amine derivatives of 5‐arylidene‐3H‐imidazol‐4(5H )‐one are a new class of bacterial efflux pump inhibitors, the chemical compounds that are able to restore antibiotic efficacy against multidrug resistant bacteria. 5‐Arylidene‐3H‐imidazol‐4(5H )‐ones with a piperazine ring at position 2 reverse the mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR) of the particularly dangerous Gram‐negative bacteria E. coli by inhibition of the efflux pump AcrA/AcrB/TolC (a main multidrug resistance mechanism in Gram‐negative bacteria, consisting of a membrane fusion protein, AcrA, a Resistant‐Nodulation‐Division protein, AcrB, and an outer membrane factor, TolC). In order to study the influence of the environment on the conformation of (Z )‐5‐(4‐chlorobenzylidene)‐2‐[4‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)piperazin‐1‐yl]‐3H‐imidazol‐4(5H )‐one, ( 3 ), two different salts were prepared, namely with picolinic acid {systematic name: 4‐[(Z )‐4‐(4‐chlorobenzylidene)‐5‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl]‐1‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)piperazin‐1‐ium pyridine‐2‐carboxylate, C₁₆H₂₀ClN₄O₂⁺·C₆H₄NO₂⁻, ( 3 a )} and 4‐nitrophenylacetic acid {systematic name: 4‐[(Z )‐4‐(4‐chlorobenzylidene)‐5‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl]‐1‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)piperazin‐1‐ium 2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)acetate, C₁₆H₂₀ClN₄O₂⁺·C₈H₆NO₄⁻, ( 3 b )}. The crystal structures of the new salts were determined by X‐ray diffraction. In both crystal structures, the molecule of ( 3 ) is protonated at an N atom of the piperazine ring by proton transfer from the corresponding acid. The carboxylate group of picolinate engages in hydrogen bonds with three molecules of the cation of ( 3 ), whereas the carboxylate group of 4‐nitrophenylacetate engages in hydrogen bonds with only two molecules of ( 3 ). As a consequence of these interactions, different orientations of the hydroxyethyl group of ( 3 ) are observed. The crystal structures are additionally stabilized by both C—H…N [in ( 3 a )] and C—H…O [in ( 3 a ) and ( 3 b )] intermolecular interactions. The geometry of the imidazolone fragment was compared with other crystal structures possessing this moiety. The tautomer observed in the crystal structures presented here, namely 3H‐imidazol‐4(5H )‐one [systematic name: 1H‐imidazol‐5(4H )‐one], is also that most frequently observed in other structures containing this heterocycle.     

Concomitant polymorphic forms of 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole

The dipharmacophore compound 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole, C₁₀H₁₁N₅O, was studied on the assumption of its potential biological activity. Two concomitant polymorphs were obtained on crystallization from isopropanol solution and these were thoroughly studied. Identical conformations of the molecules are found in both structures despite the low difference in energy between the four possible conformers. The two polymorphs differ crucially with respect to their crystal structures. A centrosymmetric dimer formed due to both stacking interactions of the `head‐to‐tail' type and N—H…N(π) hydrogen bonds is the building unit in the triclinic structure. The dimeric building units form an isotropic packing. In the orthorhombic polymorphic structure, the molecules form stacking interactions of the `head‐to‐head' type, which results in their organization in a column as the primary basic structural motif. The formation of N—H…N(lone pair) hydrogen bonds between two neighbouring columns allows the formation of a double column as the main structural motif. The correct packing motifs in the two polymorphs could not be identified without calculations of the pairwise interaction energies. The triclinic structure has a higher density and a lower (by 0.60 kcal mol^?1) lattice energy according to periodic calculations compared to the orthorhombic structure. This allows us to presume that the triclinic form of 3‐cyclopropyl‐5‐(2‐hydrazinylpyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole is the more stable.     

Crystalline Behavior and Structure of a Liquid Crystal Compound, 5‐{[4′‐(((Pentyl)oxy)‐4‐biphenylyl)carbonyl]oxy}‐1‐pentyne

Single crystals of two liquid crystal compounds, 5‐{[4′‐(((pentyl)oxy)‐4‐biphenylyl)carbonyl]oxy}‐1‐pentyne (A3EO5) and 5‐{[(4′‐nonyloxy‐4‐biphenylyl)carbonyl]oxy}‐1‐pentyne (A3EO9), have been prepared by solution growth technique. The morphologies and structures of A3EO5 and A3EO9 crystals were investigated by wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WXRD), atom force microscope (AFM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). In contrast to the same series of compounds which have a longer alkyl tail, 5‐{[(4′‐heptoxy‐4‐biphenylyl)carbonyl]oxy}‐1‐pentyne (A3EO7), 5‐{[(4′‐heptoxy‐4‐biphenylyl)oxy]carbonyl}‐1‐pentyne (A3E′O7) and A3EO9, A3EO5 shows strikingly different crystalline behavior. The former three compounds have only one crystal form, whereas A3EO5 exhibits polymorphism. Specifically, A3EO5 crystals grown from toluene solution show two crystal forms. The first one is crystal I which adopts a monoclinic P112/m space group with unit cell parameters of a?5.79 Å, b?8.34 Å, c?43.92 Å, γ?96°, and the other one is crystal II which adopts a monoclinic P112 space group with unit cell parameters of a?5.55 Å, b?7.38 Å, c?31.75 Å, γ?94°. When using dioxane as the solvent to grow A3EO5 crystal, we can selectively obtain crystal I. A3EO5 melt‐grown crystals also have two crystal forms which derive from crystal I and crystal II, respectively. The different crystalline behavior of the compounds should correlate with their different electron dipole moment resulting from the different length of alkyl tail.     

Structure and Photochemical Properties of r‐1, c‐2, t‐3, t‐4‐l, 3‐Bis [2‐ (5‐R‐benzoxazolyl) ] −2,4‐di (4‐R' ‐phenyl) cyclobutane

r‐1, c‐2, t‐3, t‐4‐1,3‐Bis[2‐(5‐R‐benzoxazolyl)]‐2,4‐di(4‐R'‐phenyl)cyclobutane (IIa: R=R' = H; IIb: R=Me, R'= H; IIc: R = Me, R' = OMe) was synthesized with high stereo‐selectivity by the photodimerization of trans‐l‐[2‐(5‐R‐benzoxazolyl)]‐2‐(4‐R'‐phenyl) ethene (Ia: R=R' = H; Ib: R = Me, R' = H; Ic: R = Me, R' = OMe) in sulfuric acid. The structures of IIa–IIc were identified by elemental analysis, IR, UV, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and MS. The molecular and crystal structure of IIc has been determined by X‐ray diffraction method. The crystal of IIc (C₃₄H₃₀N₂O₄. 0.5C₂OH) is monoclinic, space group P2₁/n with cell dimensions of a = 1.5416(3), b =0.5625(1), c = 1.7875(4) nm, β = 91.56 (3)°, V= 1.550(1) nm³, Z = 2. The structure shows that the molecule of IIc is centrosymmetric, which indicates that the dimerization process is a head‐to‐tail fashion. The selectivity of the photodimerization of Ia–Ic has been enhanced by using acidic solvent and the reaction speed would be decreased when electron donating group was introduced in the 4‐position of the phenyl group. That the photodimerization is not affected by the presence of oxygen as well as its high stereo‐selectivity demonstrated that the reaction proceeded through an excited singlet state. It was also found that under irradiation of short wavelength UV, these dimers underwent photolysis completely to reproduce its trans‐monomers, and then the new formed species changed into their cis‐isomers through trans‐cis isomerization.     

The structural properties of a noncentrosymmetric polymorph of 4‐aminobenzoic acid

The crystal structure of a polymorph of 4‐aminobenzoic acid (PABA), C₇H₇NO₂, at 100 K is noncentrosymmetric, as opposed to centrosymmetric in the structures of the other known polymorphs. The two crystallographically independent PABA molecules form pseudocentrosymmetric O—H...O hydrogen‐bonded dimers that are further linked by N—H...O hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network. The benzene rings stack in the b direction. The CO₂ moieties are bent out slightly from the benzene ring plane.     

Three polymorphs of 3‐(3‐phenyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐yl)‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one formed from different solvents

The polymorphic study of 3‐(3‐phenyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐5‐yl)‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one, C₁₇H₁₁N₃O₂, was performed due to its potential biological activity and revealed three polymorphic modifications in the triclinic space group P, the monoclinic space group P2₁ and the orthorhombic space group Pbca. These polymorphs have a one‐column layered type of crystal organization. The strongest interactions between the molecules of the studied structures is stacking between π‐systems, while N—H…N and C—H…O hydrogen bonds link stacked columns forming layers as a secondary basic structural motif. C—H…π hydrogen bonds were observed between neighbouring layers and their role is the least significant in the formation of the crystal structure. Packing differences between the polymorphic modifications are minor and can be identified only using an analysis based on a comparison of the pairwise interaction energies.     

Structural Transformation Pathways of Alkaline Earth Family Coordination Polymers Containing 3,3′,5,5′‐Biphenyl Tetracarboxylic Acid

The understanding of crystal stepwise transformation is very important to enclose the “black box” in the preparation of crystal materials. In this work, different structural intermediates were isolated prior to the formation of the final alkali earth coordination polymers (CPs) during the preparation of three pairs of alkali earth CPs through solvothermal method and convenient oil‐bath reactions. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis demonstrated the structural transformation from a 0 D to 1 D inorganic connectivity for the Ca‐CPs and Sr‐CPs, but a 1 D to 0 D inorganic connectivity for Ba‐CPs, involving the breakage/formation of chemical bonds in the reaction solutions. Further analyses indicated that these two different structural transformation pathways are determined by the deprotonation of organic acid, competitive balance between the inorganic and organic connectivity, and the twist of the linker. FT‐IR spectra, thermogravimetric and luminescence behaviors agree with their structural characteristics.     

Three polymorphs of an inclusion compound of 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid and trimethylamine

Polymorphism is the ability of a solid material to exist in more than one form or crystal structure and this is of interest in the fields of crystal engineering and solid‐state chemistry. 2,2′‐(Disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid (also called 2,2′‐dithiosalicylic acid, DTSA) is able to form different hydrogen bonds using its carboxyl groups. The central bridging S atoms allow the two terminal arene rings to rotate freely to generate various hydrogen‐bonded linking modes. DTSA can act as a potential host molecule with suitable guest molecules to develop new inclusion compounds. We report here the crystal structures of three new polymorphs of the inclusion compound of DTSA and trimethylamine, namely trimethylazanium 2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid monosolvate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₁₄H₉O₄S₂⁻·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂, (1), tetrakis(trimethylazanium) bis{2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate} 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoate 2,2′‐(disulfanediyl)dibenzoic acid monosolvate, 4C₃H₁₀N⁺·2C₁₄H₉O₄S₂⁻·C₁₄H₈O₄S₂²⁻·C₁₄H₁₀O₄S₂, (2), and trimethylazanium 2‐[(2‐carboxyphenyl)disulfanyl]benzoate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₁₄H₉O₄S₂⁻, (3). In the three polymorphs, DTSA utilizes its carboxyl groups to form conventional O—H…O hydrogen bonds to generate different host lattices. The central N atoms of the guest amine molecules accept H atoms from DTSA molecules to give the corresponding cations, which act as counter‐ions to produce the stable crystal structures via N—H…O hydrogen bonding between the host acid and the guest molecule. It is noticeable that although these three compounds are composed of the same components, the final crystal structures are totally different due to the various configurations of the host acid, the number of guest molecules and the inducer (i.e. ancillary experimental acid).     

Comparison of the hydrogen‐bond patterns in 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1) and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1)

The X‐ray single‐crystal structure determinations of the chemically related compounds 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, C₂H₄N₃S⁺·C₂HO₄⁻, (I), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), C₂H₃N₃S·2C₄H₆O₄, (II), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₅H₈O₄, (III), and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₆H₁₀O₄, (IV), are reported and their hydrogen‐bonding patterns are compared. The hydrogen bonds are of the types N—H...O or O—H...N and are of moderate strength. In some cases, weak C—H...O interactions are also present. Compound (II) differs from the others not only in the molar ratio of base and acid (1:2), but also in its hydrogen‐bonding pattern, which is based on chain motifs. In (I), (III) and (IV), the most prominent feature is the presence of an R₂²(8) graph‐set motif formed by N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, which are present in all structures except for (I), where only a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds is present, in agreement with the greater acidity of oxalic acid. There are nonbonding S...O interactions present in all four structures. The difference electron‐density maps show a lack of electron density about the S atom along the S...O vector. In all four structures, the carboxylic acid H atoms are present in a rare configuration with a C—C—O—H torsion angle of ∼0°. In the structures of (II)–(IV), the C—C—O—H torsion angle of the second carboxylic acid group has the more common value of ∼|180|°. The dicarboxylic acid molecules are situated on crystallographic inversion centres in (II). The Raman and IR spectra of the title compounds are presented and analysed.     

1,4‐Di‐4‐Pyridylpiperazine; Synthesis,Crystallographic and Mesogenic Studies of its H‐Boned Complexes with p‐Alkoxybenzoic Acids

1,4‐Di‐4‐pyridylpiperazine 1 was prepared from reaction of piperazine with 4‐chloropyridine and then further blended with p‐alkoxybenzoic acids. Subsequently, a series of H‐bonded complexes were obtained and the mesogenic behaviours of the complexes were then investigated. A good quality of crystal from 1,4‐di‐4‐pyridylpiperazine and p‐octyloxybenzoic acid for single crystal structure determination was also isolated and then studied.     

Combinatorial Crystal Synthesis: Structural Landscape of Phloroglucinol:1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene and Phloroglucinol:Phenazine

A large number of crystal forms, polymorphs and pseudopolymorphs, have been isolated in the phloroglucinol‐dipyridylethylene (PGL:DPE) and phloroglucinol‐phenazine (PGL:PHE) systems. An understanding of the intermolecular interactions and synthon preferences in these binary systems enables one to design a ternary molecular solid that consists of PGL, PHE, and DPE, and also others where DPE is replaced by other heterocycles. Clean isolation of these ternary cocrystals demonstrates synthon amplification during crystallization. These results point to the lesser likelihood of polymorphism in multicomponent crystals compared to single‐component crystals. The appearance of several crystal forms during crystallization of a multicomponent system can be viewed as combinatorial crystal synthesis with synthon selection from a solution library. The resulting polymorphs and pseudopolymorphs that are obtained constitute a crystal structure landscape.     

基于二-吡嗪-(2, 3-f: 2′3′-h)-喹喔啉和吡啶-2，5-二羧酸混合配体的两个新奇金属有机超分子骨架的水热合成、晶体结构与光致发光

以二-吡嗪-(2, 3-f: 2′3′-h)-喹喔啉(Dpq)和吡啶-2,5-二羧酸(2,5-H2pda)两种混合配体与不同金属硝酸盐为原料,通过水热反应得到了两个新奇的金属有机骨架[Zn2(Dpq)2(2,5-pda)2(H2O)2]·2H2O(1)和[Cd2(Dpq)2(2,5-pda)2]·2H2O(2),并经元素分析、TG、IR、X-射线单晶衍射分析进行了表征。结构分析表明,2,5-pda采取不同的配位方式桥连金属离子分别形成了二聚物1和2D菱形网络2。在化合物1中,相邻的二聚物通过氢键和π-π堆积作用形成扭曲的a-Po超分子结构。在化合物2中,相邻的配位聚合物层通过氢键拓展成扭曲的a-Po超分子骨架,而π-π堆积起到巩固骨架的作用。化合物1和2的结构差异表明了金属离子和配体在配位聚合物自组装过程中对结构的影响。此外固态标题化合物在室温下表现出蓝色的发光性质。     

A combined crystallographic,thermal, Raman and computational study on polymorphism and phase transition in 1‐(4‐hexyloxy‐3‐hydroxyphenyl)ethanone

The crystal structure of the triclinic polymorph of 1‐(4‐hexyloxy‐3‐hydroxyphenyl)ethanone, C₁₄H₂₀O₃, differs markedly from that of the orthorhombic polymorph [Manzano et al. (2015). Acta Cryst. C 71 , 1022–1027]. The two molecular structures are alike with respect to their bond lengths and angles, but differ in their spatial arrangement. This gives rise to quite different packing schemes, even if built up by similar chains having the hydroxy–ethanone O—H…O hydrogen‐bond synthon in common. Both phases were found to be related by a first‐order thermally driven phase transformation at 338–340 K, which is discussed in detail. The relative stabilities of both polymorphs are explained on the basis of both the noncovalent interactions operating in each structure and quantum chemical calculations. The polymorphic phase transition has also been studied experimentally by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) experiments, conducted on individual single crystals, Raman spectroscopy and controlled heating under a microscope of individual single crystals, which were further characterized by powder and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Two tautomeric forms of 2‐amino‐5,6‐dimethylpyrimidin‐4‐one

Derivatives of 4‐hydroxypyrimidine are an important class of biomolecules. These compounds can undergo keto–enol tautomerization in solution, though a search of the Cambridge Structural Database shows a strong bias toward the 3H‐keto tautomer in the solid state. Recrystallization of 2‐amino‐5,6‐dimethyl‐4‐hydroxypyrimidine, C₆H₉N₃O, from aqueous solution yielded triclinic crystals of the 1H‐keto tautomer, denoted form (I). Though not apparent in the X‐ray data, the IR spectrum suggests that small amounts of the 4‐hydroxy tautomer are also present in the crystal. Monoclinic crystals of form (II), comprised of a 1:1 ratio of both the 1H‐keto and the 3H‐keto tautomers, were obtained from aqueous solutions containing uric acid. Forms (I) and (II) exhibit one‐dimensional and three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding motifs, respectively.     

Design of two series of 1:1 cocrystals involving 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine and carboxylic acids

Two series of a total of ten cocrystals involving 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine with various carboxylic acids have been prepared and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The pyrimidine unit used for the cocrystals offers two ring N atoms (positions N1 and N3) as proton‐accepting sites. Depending upon the site of protonation, two types of cations are possible [Rajam et al. (2017). Acta Cryst. C 73 , 862–868]. In a parallel arrangement, two series of cocrystals are possible depending upon the hydrogen bonding of the carboxyl group with position N1 or N3. In one series of cocrystals, i.e. 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–3‐bromothiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid (1/1), 1 , 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–5‐chlorothiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid (1/1), 2 , 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–2,4‐dichlorobenzoic acid (1/1), 3 , and 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–2‐aminobenzoic acid (1/1), 4 , the carboxyl hydroxy group (–OH) is hydrogen bonded to position N1 (O—H…N1) of the corresponding pyrimidine unit (single point supramolecular synthon). The inversion‐related stacked pyrimidines are doubly bridged by the carboxyl groups via N—H…O and O—H…N hydrogen bonds to form a large cage‐like tetrameric unit with an R₄²(20) graph‐set ring motif. These tetrameric units are further connected via base pairing through a pair of N—H…N hydrogen bonds, generating R₂²(8) motifs (supramolecular homosynthon). In the other series of cocrystals, i.e. 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–5‐methylthiophene‐2‐carboxylic acid (1/1), 5 , 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–benzoic acid (1/1), 6 , 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–2‐methylbenzoic acid (1/1), 7 , 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–3‐methylbenzoic acid (1/1), 8 , 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–4‐methylbenzoic acid (1/1), 9 , and 4‐amino‐5‐chloro‐2,6‐dimethylpyrimidine–4‐aminobenzoic acid (1/1), 10 , the carboxyl group interacts with position N3 and the adjacent 4‐amino group of the corresponding pyrimidine ring via O—H…N and N—H…O hydrogen bonds to generate the robust R₂²(8) supramolecular heterosynthon. These heterosynthons are further connected by N—H…N hydrogen‐bond interactions in a linear fashion to form a chain‐like arrangement. In cocrystal 1 , a Br…Br halogen bond is present, in cocrystals 2 and 3 , Cl…Cl halogen bonds are present, and in cocrystals 5 , 6 and 7 , Cl…O halogen bonds are present. In all of the ten cocrystals, π–π stacking interactions are observed.