风险调整收益及其在投资决策中的应用——对均值—方差决策准则一点补充

指出传统的均值 方差决策规则在度量风险方面的不足,认为风险与投资收益的偏差有关;指出了一种新的风险度量指标———风险组合偏差,同时提出了一种能够根据风险大小进行投资的决策指标———风险调整收益,并举例说明了二者在分析投资项目时的应用。     

CVaR风险度量模型在投资组合中的运用

风险价值(VaR)是近年来金融机构广泛运用的风险度量指标，条件风险价值(CVaR)是VaR的修正模型，也称为平均超额损失或尾部VaR，它比VaR具有更好的性质。在本中，我们将运用风险度量指标VaR和CVaR，提出一个新的最优投资组合模型。介绍了模型的算法，而且利用我国的股票市场进行了实证分析，验证了新模型的有效性，为制定合理的投资组合提供了一种新思路。     

流动性风险的度量

VaR模型忽略了流动性风险,到目前为止还没有统一的指标度量流动性风险.本文分析了最高成交价与最低成交价之差模型度量流动性风险存在偏差,同时给出了度量流动性风险一种新的修正模型.最后,结合实证对两种模型进行对比,修正模型从更加微观的层面上充分考虑到各价位的实际成交的价、量分布对总交易金额的作用,计算流动性风险值比较客观、精确.     

过度自信与风险溢价研究

非理性投资者的心理会影响风险溢价。本文基于投资者的过度自信心理偏差构建了证券投资的理性风险溢价度量模型、非理性风险溢价度量模型,并利用理性投资者和非理性投资者的相互作用,构建了证券投资的市场风险溢价度量模型,研究了非理性风险溢价对理性风险溢价和市场风险溢价的偏离问题。研究结论表明:非理性风险溢价偏离市场风险溢价的程度依赖于非理性投资者的市场价值权重。     

基于模糊决策的投资组合优化

基于模糊决策理论研究了带有成比例交易费用的证券投资组合优化问题. 首先,基于半绝对偏差风险函数和极大极小原则提出了一种新的风险函数--极大极小半绝对偏差风险函数;然后, 引入一种非线性隶属函数更加形象地描述了投资者对投资收益和投资风险的满意程度;在此基础上, 进一步提出了非线性满意程度的模糊决策投资组合选择模型;最后, 针对提出的模型,利用中国证券市场的真实数据给出了数值算例.     

证券投资组合理论的一种新模型及其应用

马科维茨(Markowitz)以证券收益率的方差作为投资风险的测度建立了组合证券投资模型，本基于熵的概念，在研究马科维茨(Markowitz)证券投资组合模型的基础上，分析了该模型用方差度量风险的不足，进而提出一种新的证券投资组合优化模型，并以实例作了说明。     

双侧风险度量方法及其在投资组合优化模型中的应用

现有的资产风险度量方法不能合理的反映收益的向上波动给投资者带来的风险感受,针对这一不足,本文提出了一种新的风险度量方法,这一方法综合考虑了投资者对于损失的规避和对超额收益的偏好,能够更为真实的反映投资者对于资产收益双侧波动的不同风险感受.同时本文结合新的风险度量方法给出了投资组合优化模型,并对模型的解从不同角度进行了分析.研究结果表明,新的风险度量方法可以为投资者提供更有效的投资决策依据,并且投资者的风险态度对于投资组合有效前沿和最优投资组合都有显著的影响.     

标准化风险度量与投资决策的双目标优化

标准化风险度量(SRM)作为投资中的一种新的风险度量，其较传统风险度量的优点及在投资项目比较中特有的优良性质已被证明，本文导出SRM在概率意义下的一种重要的等价形式，并以此为基础建立以标准化风险(SR)为目标或约束的投资决策优化方法，该方法的核心是将以SRM为风险度量的优化问题转化为线性规划问题的优化技术，此技术结合利用统计抽样数据，可优化含有大量金融工具的投资组合，本文在考虑交易成本的情形下建立了最小化投资的标准化风险的同时最大化其期望有效回报(EER)的双目标优化模型，最后，具体考虑了上证30指数股票组合的优化以说明所建议的方法及模型的应用并实证它们的可行、合理及优良性，其中统计抽样基于近期历史数据。     

新型风险投资组合选择模型

为克服现有关于风险投资的投资组合选择研究所存在的诸如相关参量在实际中不易确定、对投资风险的刻画过于粗糙等不足,本文依据风险投资的特点,提出了直接基于对风险投资项目的综合评价值来预测其未来投资效益与风险的新方法,给出了两种更合理的风险度量,并由此导出了相应的新型风险投资的投资组合选择模型,模拟结果说明了新度量和模型的合理性和实用价值.     

Haezendonck风险度量的修正和优化

在本文中, 我们对Haezendonck风险度量进行了修正. Haezendonck风险度量是最小的Orlicz风险度量, 它的命名是为了纪念J. Haezendonck, 实际上, Haezendonck风险度量同样是对风险的一种量化, 它在Orlicz空间中研究, 是用一类函数定义的风险度量, 这种风险度量有一些好的性质. 但是在现实生活中, 当风险增大的时候, 损失或收益会相应地变得更大一些. 所以本文从实际出发, 对Haezendonck风险度量进行了修正, 给出了修正Haezendonck风险度量的定义, 并且论证了它的一些性质. 这是对Haezendonck风险度量的推广和改进, 对实际有一定的指导意义.     

Operational risk: Emerging markets,sectors and measurement

The role of decision support systems in mitigating operational risks in firms is well established. However, there is a lack of investment in decision support systems in emerging markets, even though inadequate operational risk management is a key cause of discouraging external investment. This has also been exacerbated by insufficient understanding of operational risk in emerging markets, which can be attributed to past operational risk measurement techniques, limited studies on emerging markets and inadequate data.     

一种基于区间数的证券组合投资模型与求解

提出了区间数的相对左偏度的定义.利用区间数的相对左偏度作为区间数下表达证券风险损失率的一种补充,能合理地反映风险损失率与预期收益率之间的相关关系.建立了一种新的证券组合投资区间数规划模型,将区间数规划模型转化为参数线性规划问题求解,使证券组合投资决策分析更加具有柔性.最后通过实例分析了该模型的应用价值.     

Optimal investment under operational flexibility, risk aversion, and uncertainty

Traditional real options analysis addresses the problem of investment under uncertainty assuming a risk-neutral decision maker and complete markets. In reality, however, decision makers are often risk averse and markets are incomplete. We confirm that risk aversion lowers the probability of investment and demonstrate how this effect can be mitigated by incorporating operational flexibility in the form of embedded suspension and resumption options. Although such options facilitate investment, we find that the likelihood of investing is still lower compared to the risk-neutral case. Risk aversion also increases the likelihood that the project will be abandoned, although this effect is less pronounced. Finally, we illustrate the impact of risk aversion on the optimal suspension and resumption thresholds and the interaction among risk aversion, volatility, and optimal decision thresholds under complete operational flexibility.     

基于分类回归树的个人信用客观评分指标体系(英文)

本文提出了一种客观的个人信用指标体系.首先利用分类回归树量化每个指标对信用状况的影响程度,并以此量化值为每个指标设置不同的评分权重;然后通过定义风险度量值来确定指标中各个取值的评分,进而建立了新的评估指标体系.通过选取现实样本数据对指标体系做了实证分析,分析结果表明,新建的指标体系能很好地对借款人进行风险评价.     

选择与评价新产品开发的风险决策研究

本文针对企业投资决策者在新产品开发中的风险决策,基于贝叶斯决策理论及其相关研究建立了评估外部情报信息价值的数学模型,探讨投资决策者风险倾向、新产品开发风险投资未来市场需求以及情报费用对投资决策的影响机制,并用于评估新产品开发决策。研究结果有助于理解企业决策者进行新产品开发决策时应考虑的因素和情境,并能够辅助决策。最后,将这一数学模型应用到一家大型高科技企业的案例中。应用案例分析结果表明:本文的研究结论能够为企业开发新产品提供相关的决策依据。     

Multistage decision-making fuzzy methodology for optimal investments based on experts’ evaluations

A new methodology of making a decision on an optimal investment in several projects is proposed. The methodology is based on experts’ evaluations and consists of three stages. In the first stage, Kaufmann’s expertons method is used to reduce a possibly large number of applicants for credit. Using the combined expert data, the credit risk level is determined for each project. Only the projects with low risks are selected.     

MaxVaR with non-Gaussian distributed returns

The common fallacy in risk measurement throughout a long investment horizon is to handle only the terminal risk. This pathology affects Value-at-Risk, hence a recent contribution in the literature has proposed the concept of within-horizon risk as a solution to the problem. The quantification of this type of risk leads to the so called MaxVaR measure, but the assumption of Gaussian distributed returns biases this model. This study analyzes the consequences of non-Gaussian returns to the MaxVaR inference. An example of application to long-term risk management is provided.     

Quality investment and price decision in a risk-averse supply chain

In this paper, we investigate quality investment and price decision of a make-to-order (MTO) supply chain with uncertain demand in international trade. Due to volatility of orders from buyers, the supplier and the manufacturer in the supply chain are subject to financial risk. In contrast to the general assumption that players in a supply chain are risk neutral in quality investment and price decision, we consider the risk-averse behavior of the players in three different supply chain strategies: Vertical Integration (VI), Manufacturer’s Stackelberg (MS) and Supplier’s Stackelberg (SS). The study shows that both supply chain strategy and risk-averse behavior have significant impacts on quality investment and pricing. Compared to a risk-neutral supply chain, a risk-averse supply chain has lower, same and higher quality of products in VI, MS and SS, respectively. Also, we derive the conditions under which the supply chain strategy is implemented in a decentralized setting. A numerical study is used to illustrate some related issues.