Highly effective pincer-ligated iridium catalysts for alkane dehydrogenation. DFT calculations of relevant thermodynamic, kinetic, and spectroscopic properties

The p-methoxy-substituted pincer-ligated iridium complexes, (MeO-(tBu)PCP)IrH(4) ((R)PCP = kappa(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(CH(2)PR(2))(2)) and (MeO-(iPr)PCP)IrH(4), are found to be highly effective catalysts for the dehydrogenation of alkanes (both with and without the use of sacrificial hydrogen acceptors). These complexes offer an interesting comparison with the recently reported bis-phosphinite "POCOP" ((R)POCOP = kappa(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(OPR(2))(2)) pincer-ligated catalysts, which also show catalytic activity higher than unsubstituted PCP analogues (Gottker-Schnetmann, I.; White, P.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1804). On the basis of nu(CO) values of the respective CO adducts, the MeO-PCP complexes appear to be more electron-rich than the parent PCP complexes, whereas the POCOP complexes appear to be more electron-poor. However, the MeO-PCP and POCOP ligands are calculated (DFT) to show effects in the same directions, relative to the parent PCP ligand, for the kinetics and thermodynamics of a broad range of reactions including the addition of C-H and H-H bonds and CO. In general, both ligands favor (relative to unsubstituted PCP) addition to the 14e (pincer)Ir fragments but disfavor addition to the 16e complexes (pincer)IrH(2) or (pincer)Ir(CO). These kinetic and thermodynamic effects are all largely attributable to the same electronic feature: O --> C(aryl) pi-donation, from the methoxy or phosphinito groups of the respective ligands. DFT calculations also indicate that the kinetics (but not the thermodynamics) of C-H addition to (pincer)Ir are favored by sigma-withdrawal from the phosphorus atoms. The high nu(CO) value of (POCOP)Ir(CO) is attributable to electrostatic effects, rather than decreased Ir-CO pi-donation or increased OC-Ir sigma-donation.     

Distinct thermodynamics for the formation and cleavage of N-H bonds in aniline and ammonia. Directly-observed reductive elimination of ammonia from an isolated amido hydride complex

The reactions of aryl and alkylamines with the (PCP)Ir fragment (PCP = 1,3-di-tert-butylphosphinobenzene) were studied to determine the reactivities and stabilities of amine and amido hydride complexes relative to C-H activation products. Reaction of aniline with the (PCP)Ir unit generated from (PCP)IrH2 and norbornene resulted in the N-H oxidative addition product (PhNH)(H)Ir(PCP) (1a). In contrast, reaction of this fragment with ammonia gave the ammonia complex (NH3)Ir(PCP) (2). The amido hydride complex that would be formed by oxidative addition of ammonia, (PCP)Ir(NH2)(H) (1b), was generated independently by deprotonation of the ammonia complex (NH3)Ir(H)(Cl)(PCP) (3) with KN(SiMe3)2 at low temperature. This amido hydride complex underwent reductive elimination at room temperature to form the ammonia complex 2. Addition of CO to anilide complex 1a gave (PCP)Ir(PhNH)(H)(CO) (4a). Addition of CNtBu to terminal amido complex 1b formed (PCP)Ir(NH2)(H)(CNtBu) (4b), the first structurally characterized iridium amido hydride. Complexes 4a and 4b underwent reductive elimination of aniline and ammonia; parent amido complex 4b reacted faster than anilide 4a. These observations suggest distinct thermodynamics for the formation and cleavage of N-H bonds in aniline and ammonia. Complexes 1a, 2, 4a, and 4b were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods.     

Selective cleavage of the C-C bonds of aminoethyl groups, via a multistep pathway, by a pincer iridium complex

A pincer-ligated iridium complex is found to react with N-ethylamines, HN(Et)R (R = cyclohexyl, tert-butyl, ethyl), to give the corresponding iridium isocyanide complexes (PCP)Ir(CH3)(H)(CNR) (PCP = kappa3-2,6-(tBu2PCH2)2C6H3). This novel, regioselective C-C bond cleavage reaction occurs readily under mild conditions (25-45 degrees C). The reaction is shown to proceed via initial dehydrogenation of the amine to give the corresponding imine (N-ethylidenealkylamine). The ethylidene sp2 C-H bond then undergoes addition to iridium, followed by methyl migration.     

Oxide- and zeolite-supported isostructural ir(c(2)h(4))(2) complexes: molecular-level observations of electronic effects of supports as ligands

Zeolite Hβ- and γ-Al(2)O(3)-supported mononuclear iridium complexes were synthesized by the reaction of Ir(C(2)H(4))(2)(acac) (acac is acetylacetonate) with each of the supports. The characterization of the surface species by extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) and infrared (IR) spectroscopies demonstrated the removal of acac ligands during chemisorption, leading to the formation of essentially isostructural Ir(C(2)H(4))(2) complexes anchored to each support by two Ir-O(support) bonds. Atomic-resolution aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images confirm the spectra, showing only isolated Ir atoms on the supports with no evidence of iridium clusters. These samples, together with previously reported Ir(C(2)H(4))(2) complexes on zeolite HY, zeolite HSSZ-53, and MgO supports, constitute a family of isostructural supported iridium complexes. Treatment with CO led to the replacement of the ethylene ligands on iridium with CO ligands, and the ν(CO) frequencies of these complexes and white line intensities in the X-ray absorption spectra at the Ir L(III) edge show that the electron density on iridium increases in the following order on these supports: zeolite HY < zeolite Hβ < zeolite HSSZ-53 ? γ-Al(2)O(3) < MgO. The IR spectra of the iridium carbonyl complexes treated in flowing C(2)H(4) show that the CO ligands were replaced by C(2)H(4), with the average number of C(2)H(4) groups per Ir atom increasing as the amount of iridium was increasingly electron-deficient. In contrast to the typical supported catalysts incorporating metal clusters or particles that are highly nonuniform, the samples reported here, incorporating uniform isostructural iridium complexes, provide unprecedented opportunities for a molecular-level understanding of how supports affect the electronic properties, reactivities, and catalytic properties of supported metal species.     

C-H activation and C=C double bond formation reactions in iridium ortho-methyl arylphosphane complexes

The Vaska-type iridium(I) complex [IrCl(CO){PPh(2)(2-MeC(6)H(4))}(2)] (1), characterized by an X-ray diffraction study, was obtained from iridium(III) chloride hydrate and PPh(2)(2,6-MeRC(6)H(3)) with R=H in DMF, whereas for R=Me, activation of two ortho-methyl groups resulted in the biscyclometalated iridium(III) compound [IrCl(CO){PPh(2)(2,6-CH(2)MeC(6)H(3))}(2)] (2). Conversely, for R=Me the iridium(I) compound [IrCl(CO){PPh(2)(2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3))}(2)] (3) can be obtained by treatment of [IrCl(COE)(2)](2) (COE=cyclooctene) with carbon monoxide and the phosphane in acetonitrile. Compound 3 in CH(2)Cl(2) undergoes intramolecular C-H oxidative addition, affording the cyclometalated hydride iridium(III) species [IrHCl(CO){PPh(2)(2,6-CH(2)MeC(6)H(3))}{PPh(2)(2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3))}] (4). Treatment of 2 with Na[BAr(f) (4)] (Ar(f)=3,5-C(6)H(3)(CF(3))(2)) gives the fluxional cationic 16-electron complex [Ir(CO){PPh(2)(2,6-CH(2)MeC(6)H(3))}(2)][BAr(f) (4)] (5), which reversibly reacts with dihydrogen to afford the delta-agostic complex [IrH(CO){PPh(2)(2,6-CH(2)MeC(6)H(3))}{PPh(2)(2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3))}][BAr(f)(4)] (6), through cleavage of an Ir-C bond. This species can also be formed by treatment of 4 with Na[BAr(f)(4)] or of 2 with Na[BAr(f)(4)] through C-H oxidative addition of one ortho-methyl group, via a transient 14-electron iridium(I) complex. Heating of the coordinatively unsaturated biscyclometalated species 5 in toluene gives the trans-dihydride iridium(III) complex [IrH(2)(CO){PPh(2)(2,6-MeC(6)H(3)CH=CHC(6)H(3)Me-2,6)PPh(2)}][BAr(f) (4)] (7), containing a trans-stilbene-type terdentate ligand, as result of a dehydrogenative carbon-carbon double bond coupling reaction, possibly through an iridium carbene species.     

Olefin Isomerization by Iridium Pincer Catalysts. Experimental Evidence for an η(3)-Allyl Pathway and an Unconventional Mechanism Predicted by DFT Calculations

The isomerization of olefins by complexes of the pincer-ligated iridium species ((tBu)PCP)Ir ((tBu)PCP = κ(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(CH(2)P(t)Bu(2))(2)) and ((tBu)POCOP)Ir ((tBu)POCOP = κ(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(OP(t)Bu(2))(2)) has been investigated by computational and experimental methods. The corresponding dihydrides, (pincer)IrH(2), are known to hydrogenate olefins via initial Ir-H addition across the double bond. Such an addition is also the initial step in the mechanism most widely proposed for olefin isomerization (the "hydride addition pathway"); however, the results of kinetics experiments and DFT calculations (using both M06 and PBE functionals) indicate that this is not the operative pathway for isomerization in this case. Instead, (pincer)Ir(η(2)-olefin) species undergo isomerization via the formation of (pincer)Ir(η(3)-allyl)(H) intermediates; one example of such a species, ((tBu)POCOP)Ir(η(3)-propenyl)(H), was independently generated, spectroscopically characterized, and observed to convert to ((tBu)POCOP)Ir(η(2)-propene). Surprisingly, the DFT calculations indicate that the conversion of the η(2)-olefin complex to the η(3)-allyl hydride takes place via initial dissociation of the Ir-olefin π-bond to give a σ-complex of the allylic C-H bond; this intermediate then undergoes C-H bond oxidative cleavage to give an iridium η(1)-allyl hydride which "closes" to give the η(3)-allyl hydride. Subsequently, the η(3)-allyl group "opens" in the opposite sense to give a new η(1)-allyl (thus completing what is formally a 1,3 shift of Ir), which undergoes C-H elimination and π-coordination to give a coordinated olefin that has undergone double-bond migration.     

Selective ortho C-h activation of haloarenes by an Ir(I) system

The cationic PNP-Ir(I)(cyclooctene) complex 1 (PNP = 2,6-bis-(di-tert-butyl phosphino methyl)pyridine) reacts with benzene at 25 degrees C to quantitatively yield the crystallographically characterized, square pyramidal, iridium phenyl hydride complex cis-(PNP)Ir(Ph)(H), 2, in which the hydride is trans to the vacant coordination site. The cationic complex 2 is stable to heating at 100 degrees C, in sharp contrast to the previously reported unstable neutral, isoelectronic (PCP)Ir(H)(Ph) (PCP = eta(3)-2,6-((t)()Bu(2)PCH(2))(2)C(6)H(3)). Heating of 2 at 50 degrees C with other arenes results in arene exchange. Complex 1 activates C-H bonds of chloro- and bromobenzene with no C-halide oxidative addition being observed. Selective ortho C-H activation takes place, the process being directed by halogen coordination and being thermodynamically and kinetically favorable. The meta- and para-C-H activation products are formed at a slower rate than the ortho isomer and are converted to it. NMR data and an X-ray crystallographic study of the ortho-activated chlorobenzene complex, which was obtained as the only product upon heating of 1 with chlorobenzene at 60 degrees C, show that the chloro substituent is coordinated to the metal center.     

Reactions of iridium hydride pincer complexes with dioxygen: new dioxygen complexes and reversible O2 binding

The reaction of molecular oxygen with iridium pincer hydride complexes, ((tBu)PCP)Ir(H)(X) [(tBu)PCP = kappa(3)-C(6)H(3)(CH(2)P(t)Bu(2))(2), X = Ph, H, CCPh], results in O(2) induced reductive elimination and formation of the novel dioxygen complexes ((tBu)PCP)Ir(O(2))(n) [n = 1 (), 2 ()].     

Dimerization of alkynes promoted by a pincer-ligated iridium complex. C-C reductive elimination inhibited by steric crowding

The pincer-ligated species (PCP)Ir (PCP = kappa3-C6H3-2,6-(CH2PtBu2)2) is found to promote dimerization of phenylacetylene to give the enyne complex (PCP)Ir(trans-1,4-phenyl-but-3-ene-1-yne). The mechanism of this reaction is found to proceed through three steps: (i) addition of the alkynyl C-H bond to iridium, (ii) insertion of a second phenylacetylene molecule into the resulting Ir-H bond, and (iii) vinyl-acetylide reductive elimination. Each of these steps has been investigated, by both experimental and computational (DFT) methods, to yield unexpected conclusions of general interest. (i) The product of alkynyl C-H addition, (PCP)Ir(CCPh)(H) (3), has been isolated and, in accord with experimental observations, is calculated to be 29 kcal/mol more stable than the analogous product of benzene C-H addition. (ii) Insertion of a second PhCCH molecule into the Ir-H bond of 3 proceeds rapidly, but with a 1,2-orientation. This orientation gives (PCP)Ir(CCPh)(CPh=CH2) (4) which would yield the 1,3-diphenyl-enyne if it were to undergo C-C elimination; however, the insertion is reversible, which represents the first example, to our knowledge, of simple beta-H elimination from a vinyl group to give a terminal hydride. The 2,1-insertion product (PCP)Ir(CCPh)(CH=CHPh) (6) forms more slowly, but unlike the 1,2 insertion product it undergoes C-C elimination to give the observed enyne. (iii) The failure of 4 to undergo C-C elimination is found to be general for (PCP)Ir(CCPh)(vinyl) complexes in which the vinyl group has an alpha-substituent. Thus, although C-C elimination relieves crowding, the reaction is inhibited by increased crowding. Density-functional theory (DFT) calculations support this surprising conclusion and offer a clear explanation. Alkynyl-vinyl bond formation in the C-C elimination transition state involves the vinyl group pi-system; this requires that the vinyl group must rotate (around the Ir-C bond) by ca. 90 degrees to achieve an appropriate orientation. This rotation is severely inhibited by steric crowding, particularly when the vinyl group bears an alpha-substituent.     

Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of rhodium and iridium complexes of the chelating bis-sulfoxide tBuSOC2H4SOtBu. Selective O-H activation of 2-hydroxy-isopropyl-pyridine

The chloro-bridged rhodium and iridium complexes [M2(BTSE)2Cl2] (M = Rh 1, Ir 2) bearing the chelating bis-sulfoxide tBuSOC2H4SOtBu (BTSE) were prepared by the reaction of [M2(COE)4Cl2] (M = Rh, Ir; COE = cyclooctene) with an excess of a racemic mixture of the ligand. The cationic compounds [M(BTSE)2][PF6] (M = Rh 3, Ir 4), bearing one S- and one O-bonded sulfoxide, were also obtained in good yields. The chloro-bridges in 2 can be cleaved with 2-methyl-6-pyridinemethanol and 2-aminomethyl pyridine, resulting in the iridium(I) complexes [Ir(BTSE)(Py)(Cl)] (Py = 2-methyl-6-pyridinemethanol 5, 2-aminomethyl-pyridine 6). In case of the bulky 2-hydroxy- isopropyl-pyridine, selective OH oxidative addition took place, forming the Ir(III)-hydride [Ir(BTSE)(2-isopropoxy-pyridine)(H)(Cl)] 7, with no competition from the six properly oriented C-H bonds. The cationic rhodium(I) and iridium(I) compounds [M(BTSE)(2-aminomethyl-pyridine)][X] (M = Rh 8, Ir 10), [Rh(BTSE)(2-hydroxy- isopropyl-pyridine)][X] 9(stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonding), [Ir(BTSE)(pyridine)2][PF6] 12, [Ir(BTSE)(alpha-picoline)2][PF6] 13, and [Rh(BTSE)(1,10-phenanthroline)][PF6] 14 were prepared either by chloride abstraction from the dimeric precursors or by replacement of the labile oxygen bonded sulfoxide in 3 or 4. Complex 14 exhibits a dimeric structure in the solid state by pi-pi stacking of the phenanthroline ligands.     

C-H activations at iridium(I) square-planar complexes promoted by a fifth ligand

In the presence of ligands such as acetonitrile, ethylene, or propylene, the Ir(I) complex [Ir(1,2,5,6-eta-C8H12)(NCMe)(PMe3)]BF4 (1) transforms into the Ir(III) derivatives [Ir(1-kappa-4,5,6-eta-C8H12)(NCMe)(L)(PMe3)]BF4 (L = NCMe, 2; eta2-C2H4, 3; eta2-C3H6, 4), respectively, through a sequence of C-H oxidative addition and insertion elementary steps. The rate of this transformation depends on the nature of L and, in the case of NCMe, the pseudo-first-order rate constants display a dependence upon ligand concentration suggesting the formation of five-coordinate reaction intermediates. A similar reaction between 1 and vinyl acetate affords the Ir(III) complex [Ir(1-kappa-4,5,6-eta-C8H12){kappa-O-eta2-OC(Me)OC2H3}(PMe3)]BF4 (7) via the isolable five-coordinate Ir(I) compound [Ir(1,2,5,6-eta-C8H12){kappa-O-eta2-OC(Me)OC2H3}(PMe3)]BF4 (6). DFT (B3LYP) calculations in model complexes show that reactions initiated by acetonitrile or ethylene five-coordinate adducts involve C-H oxidative addition transition states of lower energy than that found in the absence of these ligands. Key species in these ligand-assisted transformations are the distorted (nonsquare-planar) intermediates preceding the intramolecular C-H oxidative addition step, which are generated after release of one cyclooctadiene double bond from the five-coordinate species. The feasibility of this mechanism is also investigated for complexes [IrCl(L)(PiPr3)2] (L = eta2-C2H4, 27; eta2-C3H6, 28). In the presence of NCMe, these complexes afford the C-H activation products [IrClH(CH=CHR)(NCMe)(PiPr3)2] (R = H, 29; Me, 30) via the common cyclometalated intermediate [IrClH{kappa-P,C-P(iPr)2CH(CH3)CH2}(NCMe)(PiPr3)] (31). The most effective C-H oxidative addition mechanism seems to involve three-coordinate intermediates generated by photochemical release of the alkene ligand. However, in the absence of light, the reaction rates display dependences upon NCMe concentration again indicating the intermediacy of five-coordinate acetonitrile adducts.     

Selective addition to iridium of aryl C-H bonds ortho to coordinating groups. Not chelation-assisted

Precursors of the pincer-ligated iridium species, (PCP)Ir, react with nitrobenzene or acetophenone at ambient temperature to give O,C-chelated complexes resulting from addition of an aryl C-H bond and coordination of a nitro or acetyl oxygen. The C-H additions appear to be completely regioselective for the position ortho to the functional group; however, structural characterization and low-temperature NMR studies demonstrate that the reaction does not proceed via coordination of the functional group followed by C-H addition. In the case of nitrobenzene, kinetic preference for the para and meta positions is demonstrated at low temperature. Addition occurs more slowly at the ortho position, without assistance by the functional group; the ortho-C-H addition product is then trapped by chelation.     

Syntheses, structures, and reactivities of mono- and dinuclear iridium thiolato complexes containing nitrosyl ligands

Reactions of the iridium(III) nitrosyl complex [Ir(NO)Cl2(PPh3)2] (1) with hydrosulfide and arenethiolate anions afforded the square-pyramidal iridium(III) complex [Ir(NO)(SH)2(PPh3)2] (2) with a bent nitrosyl ligand and a series of the square-planar iridium(I) complexes [Ir(NO)(SAr)2(PPh3)] (3a, Ar = C6H2Me3-2,4,6 (Mes); 3b, Ar = C6H3Me2-2,6 (Xy); 3c, Ar = C6H2Pri3-2,4,6) containing a linear nitrosyl ligand, respectively. Complex 1 also reacted with alkanethiolate anions or alkanethiols to give the thiolato-bridged diiridium complexes [Ir(NO)(mu-SPri)(SPri)(PPh3)]2 (4) and [Ir(NO)(mu-SBut)(PPh3)]2 (5). Complex 4 contains two square-pyramidal iridium(III) centers with a bent nitrosyl ligand, whereas 5 contains two tetrahedral iridium(0) centers with a linear nitrosyl ligand and has an Ir-Ir bond. Upon treatment with benzoyl chloride, 3a and 3b were converted into the (diaryl disulfide)- and thiolato-bridged dichlorodiiridium(III) complexes [[IrCl(mu-SC6HnMe4-nCH2)(PPh3)]2(mu-ArSSAr)] (6a, Ar = Mes, n = 2; 6b, Ar = Xy, n = 3) accompanied by a loss of the nitrosyl ligands and cleavage of a C-H bond in an ortho methyl group of the thiolato ligands. Similar treatment of 4 gave the dichlorodiiridium complex [Ir(NO)(PPh3)(mu-SPri)3IrCl2(PPh3)] (7), which has an octahedral dichloroiridium(III) center and a distorted trigonal-bipyramidal Ir(I) atom with a linear nitrosyl ligand. The detailed structures of 3a, 4, 5, 6a, and 7 have been determined by X-ray crystallography.     

On the mechanism of (PCP)Ir-catalyzed acceptorless dehydrogenation of alkanes: a combined computational and experimental study

Pincer complexes of the type ((R)PCP)IrH(2), where ((R)PCP)Ir is [eta(3)-2,6-(R(2)PCH(2))(2)C(6)H(3)]Ir, are the most effective catalysts reported to date for the "acceptorless" dehydrogenation of alkanes to yield alkenes and free H(2). We calculate (DFT/B3LYP) that associative (A) reactions of ((Me)PCP)IrH(2) with model linear (propane, n-PrH) and cyclic (cyclohexane, CyH) alkanes may proceed via classical Ir(V) and nonclassical Ir(III)(eta(2)-H(2)) intermediates. A dissociative (D) pathway proceeds via initial loss of H(2), followed by C-H addition to ((Me)PCP)Ir. Although a slightly higher energy barrier (DeltaE(+ +)) is computed for the D pathway, the calculated free-energy barrier (DeltaG(+ +)) for the D pathway is significantly lower than that of the A pathway. Under standard thermodynamic conditions (STP), C-H addition via the D pathway has DeltaG(o)(+ +) = 36.3 kcal/mol for CyH (35.1 kcal/mol for n-PrH). However, acceptorless dehydrogenation of alkanes is thermodynamically impossible at STP. At conditions under which acceptorless dehydrogenation is thermodynamically possible (for example, T = 150 degrees C and P(H)2 = 1.0 x 10(-7) atm), DeltaG(+ +) for C-H addition to ((Me)PCP)Ir (plus a molecule of free H(2)) is very low (17.5 kcal/mol for CyH, 16.7 kcal/mol for n-PrH). Under these conditions, the rate-determining step for the D pathway is the loss of H(2) from ((Me)PCP)IrH(2) with DeltaG(D)(+ +) approximately DeltaH(D)(+ +) = 27.2 kcal/mol. For CyH, the calculated DeltaG(o)(+ +) for C-H addition to ((Me)PCP)IrH(2) on the A pathway is 35.2 kcal/mol (32.7 kcal/mol for n-PrH). At catalytic conditions, the calculated free energies of C-H addition are 31.3 and 33.7 kcal/mol for CyH and n-PrH addition, respectively. Elimination of H(2) from the resulting "seven-coordinate" Ir-species must proceed with an activation enthalpy at least as large as the enthalpy change of the elimination step itself (DeltaH approximately 11-13 kcal/mol), and with a small entropy of activation. The free energy of activation for H(2) elimination (DeltaG(A)(+ +)) is hence found to be greater than ca. 36 kcal/mol for both CyH and n-PrH under catalytic conditions. The overall free-energy barrier of the A pathway is calculated to be higher than that of the D pathway by ca. 9 kcal/mol. Reversible C-H(D) addition to ((R)PCP)IrH(2) is predicted to lead to H/D exchange, because the barriers for hydride scrambling are extremely low in the "seven-coordinate" polyhydrides. In agreement with calculation, H/D exchange is observed experimentally for several deuteriohydrocarbons with the following order of rates: C(6)D(6) > mesitylene-d(12) > n-decane-d(22) > cyclohexane-d(12). Because H/D exchange in cyclohexane-d(12) solution is not observed even after 1 week at 180 degrees C, we estimate that the experimental barrier to cyclohexane C-D addition is greater than 36.4 kcal/mol. This value is considerably greater than the experimental barrier for the full catalytic dehydrogenation cycle for cycloalkanes (ca. 31 kcal/mol). Thus, the experimental evidence, in agreement with calculation, strongly indicates that the A pathway is not kinetically viable as a segment of the "acceptorless" dehydrogenation cycle.     

Iridium derivatives of fluorinated aromatics by C-H activation: isolation of classical and non-classical hydrides

A reaction of trans-[Ir(H)(5)(PiPr(3))(2)] (1) with 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine, pentafluorobenzene or 1,3-difluorobenzene in the presence of neohexene affords the square-pyramidal C-H activation products cis-trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(H)(2)(PiPr(3))(2)] (2), cis-trans-[Ir(C(6)F(5))(H)(2)(PiPr(3))(2)] (4) and cis-trans-[Ir(2-C(6)H(3)F(2))(H)(2)(PiPr(3))(2)] (6). Irradiation of complex 1 with 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine or pentafluorobenzene gave the hydrides cis-trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(H)(2)(H(2))(PiPr(3))(2)] (3) or cis-trans-[Ir(C(6)F(5))(H)(2)(H(2))(PiPr(3))(2)] (5). The presence of non-classical bound H(2) moieties has been demonstrated by the measurement of T(1) times at different temperatures. For 3 the H-H distance in the H(2) ligand can be estimated to be 0.82 A. The dihydride compounds 2, 4 and 6 react with CO to yield the complexes cis-trans-[Ir(Ar)(H)(2)(CO)(PiPr(3))(2)] (7: Ar = 4-C(5)NF(4), 8: Ar = C(6)F(5), 9: Ar = 2-C(6)H(3)F(2)). A reaction of 2 or 3 with an excess of ethylene leads to the formation of ethane and the Ir(i) ethylene complex trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(eta(2)-C(2)H(4))(PiPr(3))(2)] (10). Treatment of 10 with CO furnishes the Ir(i) complex trans-[Ir(4-C(5)NF(4))(CO)(PiPr(3))(2)] (11).     

[Ir(COD)(diphos)Cl配合物活化sp^3 C-H键及其促进CO、CO2插入Ir-C键反应性能的研究

本文利用[Ir(COD)(μ-Cl)]2与双膦螯合配位体之间的反应合成了三个新的配合物[Ir(COD)(diphos)]Cl(diphos=dmpe、depe、dppe),用IR、NMR、电导和元素分析测定了结构.以CH3CN为反应底物分别考察了它们活化sp^3C-H键的能力及其反应规律.在此基础上进一步研究了使CO、CO2插入生成的Ir-CH2CN键的可能性.结果表明:在温和条件下进行这一插入反应是可能的,并用光谱方法证实有相应的含羰基、羧基的金属配合物的生成.     

DFT/ECP study of C-H activation by (PCP)Ir and (PCP)Ir(H)2(PCP=eta3-1,3-C6H3(CH2PR2)2). Enthalpies and free energies of associative and dissociative pathways

(PCP)Ir(H)2 (PCP = eta3-1,3-C6H3(CH2PR2)2) complexes are highly effective catalysts for the dehydrogenation of alkanes; in particular, they are the first efficient molecular catalysts for alkane dehydrogenation that do not require a sacrificial hydrogen acceptor. Using density functional theory/effective core potential methods, we have examined C-H bond cleavage in alkanes and arenes by both (PCP)Ir and (PCP)Ir(H)2. C-H addition to the dihydride is accompanied by loss of H2; both associative and dissociative pathways for this exchange reaction have been examined. The energetic barrier (deltaE(is not equal)) for associative displacement of H2 by benzene is much lower than the barrier for a dissociative pathway involving initial loss of H2; however, the pathways have very comparable free energy barriers (deltaG(is not equal)). Extrapolation to the higher temperatures, bulkier phosphine ligands, and the alkane substrates used experimentally leads to the conclusion that the pathway for the "acceptorless" dehydrogenation of alkanes is dissociative. For hydrocarbon/hydrocarbon exchanges, which are required for transfer-dehydrogenation, dissociative pathways are calculated to be much more favorable than associative pathways. We emphasize that it is the free energy, not just the internal energy or enthalpy, that must be considered for elementary steps that show changes in molecularity.     

Prototropic rearrangements in cycloheptatrienyl PCP pincer iridium complexes

When the cycloheptatriene iridium(iii) pincer complex (PCP)Ir(CO)(H)(Cl) (3) (PCP = 2,7-(CH(2)P(t)Bu(2))(2)C(7)H(5)) is treated with the bases NaH, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) and lithium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide (LiTMP) under various conditions different products are obtained. At elevated temperatures and with DBU or LiTMP as a base the trans dihydride (PCP')Ir(CO)(H)(2) (PCP' = 2-(CHP(t)Bu(2))-7-(CH(2)P(t)Bu(2))C(7)H(4)) (5) is formed where the pi-system extends into one of the phosphine bridges. This compound loses H(2) to give the square-planar iridium(I) carbonyl complex (PCP'IrCO). The dihydride 5 can also rearrange to the new isomeric iridium(I) carbonyl 6 (PCP'IrCO, PCP' = 2,7-(CH(2)P(t)Bu(2))(2)C(7)H(5)). Thus the two hydrides have moved into the ligand backbone creating a methylene group in the 3-position of the cycloheptatriene ring. Alternatively, 6 is formed by a rearrangement from 6a which differs from 6 by having the methylene group in the 4-position of the cycloheptatriene ring. The iridium(I) carbonyl 6a in turn is made from 3 by treatment with DBU at room temperature. Interestingly, when compound is heated to reflux in THF the hydrogen bound at the metal carbon is shifted to a carbon atom in the cycloheptatriene ring generating a ring methylene group (3a). From this complex HCl is eliminated upon chromatography forming 6 as the final product. Quantum chemical calculations at various levels of theory illustrate the relative energetic stabilities of all iridium complexes.     

Carbene vs olefin products of C-H activation on ruthenium via competing alpha- and beta-H elimination

Bulky pincer complexes of ruthenium are capable of C-H activation and H-elimination from the pincer ligand backbone to produce mixtures of olefin and carbene products. To characterize the products and determine the mechanisms of the C-H cleavage, reactions of [RuCl(2)(p-cymene)](2) with N,N'-bis(di-tert-butylphosphino)-1,3-diaminopropane (L1) and 1,3-bis(di-tert-butylphosphinomethyl)cyclohexane (L2) were studied using a combination of X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and DFT computational techniques. The reaction of L1 afforded a mixture of an alkylidene, a Fischer carbene, and two olefin isomers of the 16-e monohydride RuHCl[(t)Bu(2)PNHC(3)H(4)NHPBu(t)(2)] (2), whereas the reaction of L2 gave two olefin and two alkylidene isomers of 16-e RuHCl[2,6-(CH(2)PBu(t)(2))(2)C(6)H(8)] (3), all resulting from dehydrogenations of the ligand backbone of L1 and L2. The key intermediates implicated in the C-H activation reactions were identified as 14-electron paramagnetic species RuCl(PCP), where PCP = cyclometalated L1 or L2. Thus the alpha- and beta-H elimination reactions of RuCl(PCP) involved spin change and were formally spin-forbidden. Hydrogenation of 2 and 3 afforded 16-electron dihydrides RuH(2)Cl(PCP) distinguished by a large quantum exchange coupling between the hydrides.     

Combined experimental and computational studies on carbon-carbon reductive elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) complexes of (PCP)Ir

The reductive elimination of carbon-carbon bonds is one of the most fundamentally and synthetically important reaction steps in organometallic chemistry, yet relatively little is understood about the factors that govern the kinetics of this reaction. C-C elimination from complexes with the common d (6) six-coordinate configuration generally proceeds via prior ligand loss, which greatly complicates any attempt to directly measure the rates of the specific elimination step. We report the synthesis of a series of five-coordinate d (6) iridium complexes, ( (tBu)PCP)Ir(R)(R'), where R and R' are Me, Ph, and (phenyl-substituted) vinyl and alkynyl groups. For several of these complexes (R/R' = Ph/Vi, Me/Me, Me/Vi, Me/CCPh, and Vi/CCPh, where Vi = trans-CHCHPh) we have measured the absolute rate of C-C elimination. For R/R' = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R' = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. In general, the rates decrease (activation barriers increase) according to the following order: acetylide < vinyl approximately Me < Ph. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations offer significant insight into the factors behind this order, in particular the slow rates for elimination of the vinyl and, especially, phenyl complexes. The transition states are calculated to involve rotation of the aryl or vinyl group around the Ir-C bond, prior to C-C elimination, such that the group to which it couples can add to the face of the aryl or vinyl group. This rotation is severely hindered by the presence of the phosphino -t-butyl groups that lie above and below the plane of the aryl/vinyl group in the ground state. Accordingly, calculations predict dramatically different relative rates of elimination from the much less sterically hindered complexes ( (H)PCP)Ir(R)(R'). For example, the barrier to elimination from ( (H)PCP)Ir(Me) 2 is 20 kcal/mol, which is 2 kcal/mol greater than from the ( (tBu)PCP)Ir analogue. In contrast, the activation enthalpies calculated for vinyl-vinyl and phenyl-phenyl elimination from ( (H)PCP)Ir are remarkably low, only 2 and 9 kcal/mol, respectively; these values are 16 and 22 kcal/mol less than those of the corresponding ( (tBu)PCP)Ir complexes. Moreover, since these eliminations are very nearly thermoneutral, the barriers are calculated to be equally low for the reverse reactions [C-C oxidative addition to ( (H)PCP)Ir]. The absence of differences in intraligand CC bond lengths in the transition states relative to the ground states, combined with a comparison of calculated "face-on" and "planar" transition states for C-C coupling, suggests that the critical importance of the aryl/vinyl rotation is based on geometric or steric factors rather than electronic ones. Thus there is no evidence for participation of the pi or pi* orbitals of the aryl or vinyl groups in the formation of the C-C bond, although a small pi effect cannot be rigorously excluded. Likewise, the results do not support the hypothesis that the degree of directionality of the carbon-based orbital used for bonding to iridium (sp (3) > sp (2) > sp) plays an important role in this system in determining the barrier to reductive elimination.