Minimally Generated Abstract Logics

In this paper we study an alternative approach to the concept of abstract logic and to connectives in abstract logics. The notion of abstract logic was introduced by Brown and Suszko (Diss Math 102:9–42, 1973)—nevertheless, similar concepts have been investigated by various authors. Considering abstract logics as intersection structures we extend several notions to their κ-versions (κ ≥ ω), introduce a hierarchy of κ-prime theories, which is important for our treatment of infinite connectives, and study different concepts of κ-compactness. We are particularly interested in non-topped intersection structures viewed as semi-lattices with a minimal meet-dense subset, i.e., with a minimal generator set. We study a chain condition which is sufficient for a minimal generator set, implies compactness of the logic, and in regular logics is equivalent to (κ-) compactness of the consequence relation together with the existence of a (κ-)inconsistent set, where κ is the cofinality of the cardinality of the logic. Some of these results are known in a similar form in the context of closure spaces, we give extensions to (non-topped) intersection structures and to big cardinals presenting new proofs based on set-theoretical tools. The existence of a minimal generator set is crucial for our way to define connectives. Although our method can be extended to further non-classical connectives we concentrate here on intuitionistic and infinite ones. Our approach leads us to the concept of the set of complete theories which is stable under all considered connectives and gives rise to the definition of the topological space of the logic. Topological representations of (non-classical) abstract logics by means of this space remain to be further investigated.     

Implicational (semilinear) logics III: completeness properties

This paper presents an abstract study of completeness properties of non-classical logics with respect to matricial semantics. Given a class of reduced matrix models we define three completeness properties of increasing strength and characterize them in several useful ways. Some of these characterizations hold in absolute generality and others are for logics with generalized implication or disjunction connectives, as considered in the previous papers. Finally, we consider completeness with respect to matrices with a linear dense order and characterize it in terms of an extension property and a syntactical metarule. This is the final part of the investigation started and developed in the papers (Cintula and Noguera in Arch Math Logic 49(4):417–446, 2010; Arch Math Logic 53(3):353–372, 2016).     

A logic of implications in algebra and coalgebra

Implications in a category can be presented as epimorphisms: an object satisfies the implication iff it is injective with respect to that epimorphism. G. Ro?u formulated a logic for deriving an implication from other implications. We present two versions of implicational logics: a general one and a finitary one (for epimorphisms with finitely presentable domains and codomains). In categories Alg Σ of algebras on a given signature our logic specializes to the implicational logic of R. Quackenbush. In categories Coalg H of coalgebras for a given accessible endofunctor H of sets we derive a logic for implications in the sense of P. Gumm.     

模糊BIK~+-逻辑与非可换模糊逻辑(英文)

为了建立各种可换和非可换模糊逻辑的公共基础(蕴涵片段),提出了一个新的蕴涵逻辑,称为模糊BIK+-逻辑。证明了这一新的蕴涵逻辑的可靠性和弱完备性定理,同时讨论了模糊BIK+-逻辑与各种模糊逻辑之间的关系,以及与它们配套的代数结构之间的关系。     

Categorical abstract algebraic logic: The categorical Suszko operator

Czelakowski introduced the Suszko operator as a basis for the development of a hierarchy of non‐protoalgebraic logics, paralleling the well‐known abstract algebraic hierarchy of protoalgebraic logics based on the Leibniz operator of Blok and Pigozzi. The scope of the theory of the Leibniz operator was recently extended to cover the case of, the so‐called, protoalgebraic π‐institutions. In the present work, following the lead of Czelakowski, an attempt is made at lifting parts of the theory of the Suszko operator to the π‐institution framework. (© 2007 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

The Logic with Truth and Falsehood Operators from a Point of View of Universal Logic

The logic with independent truth and falsehood operators TFL is proposed. In TFL(→) standard truth-conditions for the implication are adopted. Nevertheless the laws of classical logic are not valid. In this language more then 10⁷ different binary connectives can be defined. So this logic can be treated as universal logic relatively to the class of sentential logics.     

Formal systems of fuzzy logic and their fragments

Formal systems of fuzzy logic (including the well-known Łukasiewicz and Gödel–Dummett infinite-valued logics) are well-established logical systems and respected members of the broad family of the so-called substructural logics closely related to the famous logic BCK. The study of fragments of logical systems is an important issue of research in any class of non-classical logics. Here we study the fragments of nine prominent fuzzy logics to all sublanguages containing implication. However, the results achieved in the paper for those nine logics are usually corollaries of theorems with much wider scope of applicability. In particular, we show how many of these fragments are really distinct and we find axiomatic systems for most of them. In fact, we construct strongly separable axiomatic systems for eight of our nine logics. We also fully answer the question for which of the studied fragments the corresponding class of algebras forms a variety. Finally, we solve the problem how to axiomatize predicate versions of logics without the lattice disjunction (an essential connective in the usual axiomatic system of fuzzy predicate logics).     

The Projective Beth Property and Interpolation in Positive and Related Logics

We look at the interplay between the projective Beth property in non-classical logics and interpolation. Previously, we proved that in positive logics as well as in superintuitionistic and modal ones, the projective Beth property PB2 follows from Craig's interpolation property and implies the restricted interpolation property IPR. Here, we show that IPR and PB2 are equivalent in positive logics, and also in extensions of the superintuitionistic logic KC and of the modal logic Grz.2. Supported by RFBR grant No. 06-01-00358, by INTAS grant No. 04-77-7080, and by the Council for Grants (under RF President) and State Aid of Fundamental Science Schools, project NSh-2069.2003.1. __________ Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 85–113, January–February, 2006.     

Symmetric implicational method of fuzzy reasoning

Fuzzy reasoning should take into account the factors of both the logic system and the reasoning model, thus a new fuzzy reasoning method called the symmetric implicational method is proposed, which contains the full implication inference method as its particular case. The previous full implication inference principles are improved, and unified forms of the new method are respectively established for FMP (fuzzy modus ponens) and FMT (fuzzy modus tollens) to let different fuzzy implications be used under the same way. Furthermore, reversibility properties of the new method are analyzed from some conditions that many fuzzy implications satisfy, and it is found that its reversibility properties seem fine. Lastly, the more general α-symmetric implicational method is put forward, and its unified forms are achieved.     

A computational glimpse at the Leibniz and Frege hierarchies

In this paper we consider, from a computational point of view, the problem of classifying logics within the Leibniz and Frege hierarchies typical of abstract algebraic logic. The main result states that, for logics presented syntactically, this problem is in general undecidable. More precisely, we show that there is no algorithm that classifies the logic of a finite consistent Hilbert calculus in the Leibniz and in the Frege hierarchies.     

Leibniz filters and the strong version of a protoalgebraic logic

A filter of a sentential logic ? is Leibniz when it is the smallest one among all the ?-filters on the same algebra having the same Leibniz congruence. This paper studies these filters and the sentential logic ?⁺ defined by the class of all ?-matrices whose filter is Leibniz, which is called the strong version of ?, in the context of protoalgebraic logics with theorems. Topics studied include an enhanced Correspondence Theorem, characterizations of the weak algebraizability of ?⁺ and of the explicit definability of Leibniz filters, and several theorems of transfer of metalogical properties from ? to ?⁺. For finitely equivalential logics stronger results are obtained. Besides the general theory, the paper examines the examples of modal logics, quantum logics and Łukasiewicz's finitely-valued logics. One finds that in some cases the existence of a weak and a strong version of a logic corresponds to well-known situations in the literature, such as the local and the global consequences for normal modal logics; while in others these constructions give an independent interest to the study of other lesser-known logics, such as the lattice-based many-valued logics. Received: 30 October 1998 /?Published online: 15 June 2001     

Normal forms for fuzzy logics: a proof-theoretic approach

A method is described for obtaining conjunctive normal forms for logics using Gentzen-style rules possessing a special kind of strong invertibility. This method is then applied to a number of prominent fuzzy logics using hypersequent rules adapted from calculi defined in the literature. In particular, a normal form with simple McNaughton functions as literals is generated for ?ukasiewicz logic, and normal forms with simple implicational formulas as literals are obtained for Gödel logic, Product logic, and Cancellative hoop logic.     

Proof complexity of intuitionistic implicational formulas

We study implicational formulas in the context of proof complexity of intuitionistic propositional logic (IPC). On the one hand, we give an efficient transformation of tautologies to implicational tautologies that preserves the lengths of intuitionistic extended Frege (EF) or substitution Frege (SF) proofs up to a polynomial. On the other hand, EF proofs in the implicational fragment of IPC polynomially simulate full intuitionistic logic for implicational tautologies. The results also apply to other fragments of other superintuitionistic logics under certain conditions.In particular, the exponential lower bounds on the length of intuitionistic EF proofs by Hrube? (2007), generalized to exponential separation between EF and SF systems in superintuitionistic logics of unbounded branching by Je?ábek (2009), can be realized by implicational tautologies.     

A normal form which preserves tautologies and contradictions in a class of fuzzy logics

Most of the normal forms for fuzzy logics are versions of conjunctive and disjunctive classical normal forms. Unfortunately, they do not always preserve tautologies and contradictions which is important, for example, for automated theorem provers based on refutation methods.De Morgan implicative systems are triples like the De Morgan systems, which consider fuzzy implications instead of t-conorms. These systems can be used to evaluate the formulas of a propositional language based on the logical connectives of negation, conjunction and implication. Therefore, they determine different fuzzy logics, called implicative De Morgan fuzzy logics.In this paper, we will introduce a normal form for implicative De Morgan systems and we will show that for implicative De Morgan fuzzy logics whose t-norms are strict, this normal form preserves contradictions as well as tautologies.     

The Pursuit of an Implication for the Logics L3A and L3B

The authors of Beziau and Franceschetto (New directions in paraconsistent logic, vol 152, Springer, New Delhi, 2015) work with logics that have the property of not satisfying any of the formulations of the principle of non contradiction, Béziau and Franceschetto also analyze, among the three-valued logics, which of these logics satisfy this property. They prove that there exist only four of such logics, but only two of them are worthwhile to study. The language of these logics does not consider implication as a connective. However, the enrichment of a language with an implication connective leads us to more interesting systems, therefore we look for one implication for these logics and we study further properties that the logics obtain when this connective is added to these systems.     

Dung’s Argumentation is Essentially Equivalent to Classical Propositional Logic with the Peirce–Quine Dagger

In this paper we show that some versions of Dung’s abstract argumentation frames are equivalent to classical propositional logic. In fact, Dung’s attack relation is none other than the generalised Peirce–Quine dagger connective of classical logic which can generate the other connectives ?, ù, ú, ?{\neg, \wedge, \vee, \to} of classical logic. After establishing the above correspondence we offer variations of the Dung argumentation frames in parallel to variations of classical logic, such as resource logics, predicate logic, etc., etc., and create resource argumentation frames, predicate argumentation frames, etc., etc. We also offer the notion of logic proof as a geometrical walk along the nodes of a Dung network and thus we are able to offer a geometrical abstraction of the notion of inference based argumentation. Thus our paper is also a contribution to the question:     

Fuzzy propositional logics

Fuzzy logic $\text{L}$_∞9 considered in connection with fuzzy sets theory, is a special theory, is a special many valued logic with truth-value sets [0, 1], which has been studied already by Lukasiewicz. We consider also his versions $\text{L}$_m for m ? 2 with finite truth-value sets. In all cases we add two further propositional connectives, one conjunction and one disjunction. For these logics we give a list of tautologies, consider relations between their sets of tautologies, prove their compactness, and mention some further results.     

Robustness analysis of full implication inference method

This paper investigates the robustness of the full implication inference method and fully implicational restriction method for fuzzy reasoning based on two basic inference models: fuzzy modus ponens and fuzzy modus tollens. Some robustness results are proved based on general left continuous t-norms and induced residuated implications, and some important fuzzy implications.