The clique operator on circular-arc graphs

A circular-arc graphG is the intersection graph of a collection of arcs on the circle and such a collection is called a model of G. Say that the model is proper when no arc of the collection contains another one, it is Helly when the arcs satisfy the Helly Property, while the model is proper Helly when it is simultaneously proper and Helly. A graph admitting a Helly (resp. proper Helly) model is called a Helly (resp. proper Helly) circular-arc graph. The clique graphK(G) of a graph G is the intersection graph of its cliques. The iterated clique graphKⁱ(G) of G is defined by K⁰(G)=G and Kⁱ⁺¹(G)=K(Kⁱ(G)). In this paper, we consider two problems on clique graphs of circular-arc graphs. The first is to characterize clique graphs of Helly circular-arc graphs and proper Helly circular-arc graphs. The second is to characterize the graph to which a general circular-arc graph K-converges, if it is K-convergent. We propose complete solutions to both problems, extending the partial results known so far. The methods lead to linear time recognition algorithms, for both problems.     

Homology of certain algebras defined by graphs

Let K(G) for a finite graph G with vertices v₁,...,v_n denote the K-algebra with generators X₁,...,X_n and defining relations X_iX_j=X_jX_i if and only if v_i is not connected to v_j by an edge in G. We describe centralizers of monomials, show that the centralizer of a monomial is again a graph algebra, prove a unique factorization theorem for factorizations of monomials into commuting factors, compute the homology of K(G), and show that K(G) is the homology ring of a certain loop space. We also construct a K(π, 1) explicitly where π is the group with generators X₁,...,X_n and defining relations X_iX_j=X_jX_i if and only if v_i is not connected to v_j by an edge in G.     

On Harary index of graphs

The Harary index is defined as the sum of reciprocals of distances between all pairs of vertices of a connected graph. For a connected graph G=(V,E) and two nonadjacent vertices v_i and v_j in V(G) of G, recall that G+v_iv_j is the supergraph formed from G by adding an edge between vertices v_i and v_j. Denote the Harary index of G and G+v_iv_j by H(G) and H(G+v_iv_j), respectively. We obtain lower and upper bounds on H(G+v_iv_j)−H(G), and characterize the equality cases in those bounds. Finally, in this paper, we present some lower and upper bounds on the Harary index of graphs with different parameters, such as clique number and chromatic number, and characterize the extremal graphs at which the lower or upper bounds on the Harary index are attained.     

On friendly index sets of 2-regular graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V and edge set E, and let A be an abelian group. A labeling f:V→A induces an edge labeling f^∗:E→A defined by f^∗(xy)=f(x)+f(y). For i∈A, let v_f(i)=card{v∈V:f(v)=i} and e_f(i)=card{e∈E:f^∗(e)=i}. A labeling f is said to be A-friendly if |v_f(i)−v_f(j)|≤1 for all (i,j)∈A×A, and A-cordial if we also have |e_f(i)−e_f(j)|≤1 for all (i,j)∈A×A. When A=Z₂, the friendly index set of the graph G is defined as {|e_f(1)−e_f(0)|:the vertex labelingf is Z₂-friendly}. In this paper we completely determine the friendly index sets of 2-regular graphs. In particular, we show that a 2-regular graph of order n is cordial if and only if n?2 (mod 4).     

On integral sum graphs

A graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its nodes can be given a labeling f with distinct integers, so that for any two distinct nodes u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v)=f(w) for some node w in G. A node of G is called a saturated node if it is adjacent to every other node of G. We show that any integral sum graph which is not K₃ has at most two saturated nodes. We determine the structure for all integral sum graphs with exactly two saturated nodes, and give an upper bound for the number of edges of a connected integral sum graph with no saturated nodes. We introduce a method of identification on constructing new connected integral sum graphs from given integral sum graphs with a saturated node. Moreover, we show that every graph is an induced subgraph of a connected integral sum graph. Miscellaneous related results are also presented.     

Clique-critical graphs: Maximum size and recognition

The clique graph of G, K(G), is the intersection graph of the family of cliques (maximal complete sets) of G. Clique-critical graphs were defined as those whose clique graph changes whenever a vertex is removed. We prove that if G has m edges then any clique-critical graph in K^-1(G) has at most 2m vertices, which solves a question posed by Escalante and Toft [On clique-critical graphs, J. Combin. Theory B 17 (1974) 170-182]. The proof is based on a restatement of their characterization of clique-critical graphs. Moreover, the bound is sharp. We also show that the problem of recognizing clique-critical graphs is NP-complete.     

Some properties onf-edge covered critical graphs

LetG(V, E) be a simple graph, and letf be an integer function onV with 1 ≤f(v) ≤d(v) to each vertexv ∈V. An f-edge cover-coloring of a graphG is a coloring of edge setE such that each color appears at each vertexv ∈V at leastf(v) times. Thef-edge cover chromatic index ofG, denoted by χ′ _fc (G), is the maximum number of colors such that anf-edge cover-coloring ofG exists. Any simple graphG has anf-edge cover chromatic index equal to δ_f or δ _f - 1, where $\delta _f = \mathop {\min }\limits_{\upsilon \in V} \{ \left\lfloor {\frac{{d(v)}}{{f(v)}}} \right\rfloor \} $ . LetG be a connected and not complete graph with χ′ _fc (G)=δ _f-1, if for eachu, v ∈V and e =uv ?E, we have ÷ _fc (G + e) > ÷ _fc (G), thenG is called anf-edge covered critical graph. In this paper, some properties onf-edge covered critical graph are discussed. It is proved that ifG is anf-edge covered critical graph, then for eachu, v ∈V and e =uv ?E there existsw ∈ {u, v } withd(w) ≤ δ _f (f(w) + 1) - 2 such thatw is adjacent to at leastd(w) - δ _f + 1 vertices which are all δ _f -vertex inG.     

The bandwidth problem for graphs and matrices—a survey

The bandwidth problem for a graph G is to label its n vertices v_i with distinct integers f(v_i) so that the quantity max{| f(v_i) ? f(v_i)| : (v_i v_j) ∈ E(G)} is minimized. The corresponding problem for a real symmetric matrix M is to find a symmetric permutation M' of M so that the quantity max{| i ? j| : m'_ij ≠ 0} is minimized. This survey describes all the results known to the authors as of approximately August 1981. These results include the effect on bandwidth of local operations such as refinement and contraction of graphs, bounds on bandwidth in terms of other graph invariants, the bandwidth of special classes of graphs, and approximate bandwidth algorithms for graphs and matrices. The survey concludes with a brief discussion of some problems related to bandwidth.     

Optimal labelling of a product of two paths

If G is a graph with p vertices and at least one edge, we set φ (G) = m n max |f(u) ? f(v)|, where the maximum is taken over all edges uv and the minimum over all one-to-one mappings f : V(G) → {1, 2, …, p}: V(G) denotes the set of vertices of G.P_n will denote a path of length n whose vertices are integers 1, 2, …, n with i adjacent to j if and only if |i ? j| = 1. P_m × P_n will denote a graph whose vertices are elements of {1, 2, …, m} × {1, 2, …, n} and in which (i, j), (r, s) are adjacent whenever either i = r and |j ? s| = 1 or j = s and |i ? r| = 1.Theorem.If max(m, n) ? 2, thenφ(P_m × P_n) = min(m, n).     

The profile of the Cartesian product of graphs

Given a graph G, a proper labelingf of G is a one-to-one function from V(G) onto {1,2,…,|V(G)|}. For a proper labeling f of G, the profile widthw_f(v) of a vertex v is the minimum value of f(v)−f(x), where x belongs to the closed neighborhood of v. The profile of a proper labelingfofG, denoted by P_f(G), is the sum of all the w_f(v), where v∈V(G). The profile ofG is the minimum value of P_f(G), where f runs over all proper labeling of G. In this paper, we show that if the vertices of a graph G can be ordered to satisfy a special neighborhood property, then so can the graph G×Q_n. This can be used to determine the profile of Q_n and K_m×Q_n.     

On distance two graphs of upper bound graphs

For a poset P=(X,≤), the upper bound graph (UB-graph) of P is the graph U=(X,E_U), where uv∈E_U if and only if u≠v and there exists m∈X such that u,v≤m. For a graph G, the distance two graph DS₂(G) is the graph with vertex set V(DS₂(G))=V(G) and u,v∈V(DS₂(G)) are adjacent if and only if d_G(u,v)=2. In this paper, we deal with distance two graphs of upper bound graphs. We obtain a characterization of distance two graphs of split upper bound graphs.     

Diameters of iterated clique graphs of chordal graphs

The clique graph K(G) of a graph is the intersection graph of maximal cliques of G. The iterated clique graph Kⁿ(G) is inductively defined as K(K^n?1(G)) and K¹(G) = K(G). Let the diameter diam(G) be the greatest distance between all pairs of vertices of G. We show that diam(Kⁿ(G)) = diam(G) — n if G is a connected chordal graph and n ≤ diam(G). This generalizes a similar result for time graphs by Bruce Hedman.     

Greedy F-colorings of graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a connected graph. For a symmetric, integer-valued function δ on V×V, where K is an integer constant, N₀ is the set of nonnegative integers, and Z is the set of integers, we define a C-mapping by F(u,v,m)=δ(u,v)+m−K. A coloring c of G is an F-coloring if F(u,v,|c(u)−c(v)|)?0 for every two distinct vertices u and v of G. The maximum color assigned by c to a vertex of G is the value of c, and the F-chromatic number F(G) is the minimum value among all F-colorings of G. For an ordering of the vertices of G, a greedy F-coloring c of s is defined by (1) c(v₁)=1 and (2) for each i with 1?i<n, c(v_i+1) is the smallest positive integer p such that F(v_j,v_i+1,|c(v_j)−p|)?0, for each j with 1?j?i. The greedy F-chromatic number gF(s) of s is the maximum color assigned by c to a vertex of G. The greedy F-chromatic number of G is gF(G)=min{gF(s)} over all orderings s of V. The Grundy F-chromatic number is GF(G)=max{gF(s)} over all orderings s of V. It is shown that gF(G)=F(G) for every graph G and every F-coloring defined on G. The parameters gF(G) and GF(G) are studied and compared for a special case of the C-mapping F on a connected graph G, where δ(u,v) is the distance between u and v and .     

Can visibility graphs Be represented compactly?

We consider the problem of representing the visibility graph of line segments as a union of cliques and bipartite cliques. Given a graphG, a familyG={G ₁,G ₂,...,G _k } is called aclique cover ofG if (i) eachG _i is a clique or a bipartite clique, and (ii) the union ofG _i isG. The size of the clique coverG is defined as ∑ _i=1 ^k n _i , wheren _i is the number of vertices inG _i . Our main result is that there are visibility graphs ofn nonintersecting line segments in the plane whose smallest clique cover has size Ω(n ²/log² n). An upper bound ofO(n ²/logn) on the clique cover follows from a well-known result in extremal graph theory. On the other hand, we show that the visibility graph of a simple polygon always admits a clique cover of sizeO(nlog³ n), and that there are simple polygons whose visibility graphs require a clique cover of size Ω(n logn). The work by the first author was supported by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-91-06514. The work by the second author was supported by a USA-Israeli BSF grant. The work by the third author was supported by National Science Foundation Grant CCR-92-11541.     

Two characterizations of interchange graphs of complete m-partite graphs

A graph G is m-partite if its points can be partitioned into m subsets V₁,…,V_m such that every line joins a point in V_i with a point in V_j, i ≠ j. A complete m-partite graph contains every line joining V_i with V_j. A complete graph K_p has every pair of its p points adjacent. The nth interchange graph I_n(G) of G is a graph whose points can be identified with the K_n+1's of G such that two points are adjacent whenever the corresponding K_n+1's have a K_n in common.Interchange graphs of complete 2-partite and 3-partite graphs have been characterized, but interchange graphs of complete m-partite graphs for m > 3 do not seem to have been investigated. The main result of this paper is two characterizations of interchange graphs of complete m-partite graphs for m ≥ 2.     

Equivariant collapses and the homotopy type of iterated clique graphs

The clique graph K(G) of a simple graph G is the intersection graph of its maximal complete subgraphs, and we define iterated clique graphs by K⁰(G)=G, Kⁿ⁺¹(G)=K(Kⁿ(G)). We say that two graphs are homotopy equivalent if their simplicial complexes of complete subgraphs are so. From known results, it can be easily inferred that Kⁿ(G) is homotopy equivalent to G for every n if G belongs to the class of clique-Helly graphs or to the class of dismantlable graphs. However, in both of these cases the collection of iterated clique graphs is finite up to isomorphism. In this paper, we show two infinite classes of clique-divergent graphs that satisfy G?Kⁿ(G) for all n, moreover Kⁿ(G) and G are simple-homotopy equivalent. We provide some results on simple-homotopy type that are of independent interest.     

Clique‐inverse graphs of K3‐free and K4‐free graphs

The clique graph K(G) of a given graph G is the intersection graph of the collection of maximal cliques of G. Given a family ℱ of graphs, the clique‐inverse graphs of ℱ are the graphs whose clique graphs belong to ℱ. In this work, we describe characterizations for clique‐inverse graphs of K₃‐free and K₄‐free graphs. The characterizations are formulated in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 35: 257–272, 2000     

On the adjacent vertex-distinguishing equitable edge coloring of graphs

Let G(V, E) be a graph. A k-adjacent vertex-distinguishing equatable edge coloring of G, k-AVEEC for short, is a proper edge coloring f if (1) C(u)≠C(v) for uv ∈ E(G), where C(u) = {f(uv)|uv ∈ E}, and (2) for any i, j = 1, 2,… k, we have ||Ei| |Ej|| ≤ 1, where Ei = {e|e ∈ E(G) and f(e) = i}. χáve (G) = min{k| there exists a k-AVEEC of G} is called the adjacent vertex-distinguishing equitable edge chromatic number of G. In this paper, we obtain the χáve (G) of some special graphs and present a conjecture.     

On integral sum graphs with a saturated vertex

As introduced by F.Harary in 1994, a graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its vertices can be given a labeling f with distinct integers so that for any two distinct vertices u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v) = f(w) for some vertex w in G.     

On double and multiple interval graphs

In this paper we discuss a generalization of the familiar concept of an interval graph that arises naturally in scheduling and allocation problems. We define the interval number of a graph G to be the smallest positive integer t for which there exists a function f which assigns to each vertex u of G a subset f(u) of the real line so that f(u) is the union of t closed intervals of the real line, and distinct vertices u and v in G are adjacent if and only if f(u) and f(v)meet. We show that (1) the interval number of a tree is at most two, and (2) the complete bipartite graph K_{m, n} has interval number ?(mn + 1)/(m + n)?.