A virtual high throughput screen for high affinity cytochrome P450cam substrates. Implications for in silico prediction of drug metabolism

Structure-based virtual screening techniques require reliable scoring functions to discriminate potential substrates effectively. In this study we compared the performance of GOLD, PMF, DOCK and FlexX scoring functions in FlexX flexible docking to cytochrome P450cam binding site. Crystal structures of protein-substrate complexes were most effectively reproduced by the FlexX/PMF method. On the other hand, the FlexX/GOLD approach provided the best correlation between experimental binding constants and predicted scores. Binding modes selected by the FlexX/PMF approach were rescored by GOLD to obtain a reliable measure of binding energetics. The effectiveness of the FlexX/PMF/GOLD method was demonstrated by the correct classification of 32 out of the 33 experimentally studied compounds and also in a virtual HTS test on a library of 10,000 compounds. Although almost all the available functions were developed to be general, our study on cytochrome P450cam substrates suggests that careful selection or even tailoring the scoring function might increase the prediction power of virtual screens significantly. The FlexX/PMF/GOLD methodology was tested on cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates and inhibitors. This preliminary study revealed that the combined function was able to recognise 334 out of the 345 compounds bound to 3A4.     

Comparison of two implementations of the incremental construction algorithm in flexible docking of thrombin inhibitors

A set of 32 known thrombin inhibitors representing different chemical classes has been used to evaluate the performance of two implementations of incremental construction algorithms for flexible molecular docking: DOCK 4.0 and FlexX 1.5. Both docking tools are able to dock 10–35% of our test set within 2 Å of their known, bound conformations using default sampling and scoring parameters. Although flexible docking with DOCK or FlexX is not able to reconstruct all native complexes, it does offer a significant improvement over rigid body docking of single, rule-based conformations, which is still often used for docking of large databases. Docking of sets of multiple conformers of each inhibitor, obtained with a novel protocol for diverse conformer generation and selection, yielded results comparable to those obtained by flexible docking. Chemical scoring, which is an empirically modified force field scoring method implemented in DOCK 4.0, outperforms both interaction energy scoring by DOCK and the Böhm scoring function used by FlexX in rigid and flexible docking of thrombin inhibitors. Our results indicate that for reliable docking of flexible ligands the selection of anchor fragments, conformational sampling and currently available scoring methods still require improvement.     

Evaluation and application of multiple scoring functions for a virtual screening experiment

In order to identify novel chemical classes of factor Xa inhibitors, five scoring functions (FlexX, DOCK, GOLD, ChemScore and PMF) were engaged to evaluate the multiple docking poses generated by FlexX. The compound collection was composed of confirmed potent factor Xa inhibitors and a subset of the LeadQuest screening compound library. Except for PMF the other four scoring functions succeeded in reproducing the crystal complex (PDB code: 1FAX). During virtual screening the highest hit rate (80%) was demonstrated by FlexX at an energy cutoff of -40 kJ/mol, which is about 40-fold over random screening (2.06%). Limited results suggest that presenting more poses of a single molecule to the scoring functions could deteriorate their enrichment factors. A series of promising scaffolds with favorable binding scores was retrieved from LeadQuest. Consensus scoring by pair-wise intersection failed to enrich the hit rate yielded by single scorings (i.e. FlexX). We note that reported successes of consensus scoring in hit rate enrichment could be artificial because their comparisons were based on a selected subset of single scoring and a markedly reduced subset of double or triple scoring. The findings presented in this report are based upon a single biological system and support further studies.     

Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening

We present the results of a comprehensive study in which we explored how the docking procedure affects the performance of a virtual screening approach. We used four docking engines and applied 10 scoring functions to the top-ranked docking solutions of seeded databases against six target proteins. The scores of the experimental poses were placed within the total set to assess whether the scoring function required an accurate pose to provide the appropriate rank for the seeded compounds. This method allows a direct comparison of library ranking efficacy. Our results indicate that the LigandFit/Ligscore1 and LigandFit/GOLD docking/scoring combinations, and to a lesser degree FlexX/FlexX, Glide/Ligscore1, DOCK/PMF (Tripos implementation), LigandFit1/Ligscore2 and LigandFit/PMF (Tripos implementation) were able to retrieve the highest number of actives at a 10% fraction of the database when all targets were looked upon collectively. We also show that the scoring functions rank the observed binding modes higher than the inaccurate poses provided that the experimental poses are available. This finding stresses the discriminatory ability of the scoring algorithms, when better poses are available, and suggests that the number of false positives can be lowered with conformers closer to bioactive ones.     

Evaluation of docking calculations on X-ray structures using CONSENSUS-DOCK

We are participating in the challenge of identifying active compounds for target proteins using structure-based virtual screening (SBVS). We use an in-house customized docking program, CONSENSUS-DOCK, which is a customized version of the DOCK4 program in which three scoring functions (DOCK4, FlexX and PMF) and consensus scoring have been implemented. This paper compares the docking calculation results obtained using CONSENSUS-DOCK and DOCK4, and demonstrates that CONSENSUS-DOCK produces better results than DOCK4 for major X-ray structures obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB).     

Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein-ligand complexes

Here, the comparisons of performance of nine consensus scoring strategies, in which multiple scoring functions were used simultaneously to evaluate candidate structures for a protein-ligand complex, in combination with nine scoring functions (FlexX score, GOLD score, PMF score, DOCK score, ChemScore, DrugScore, PLP, ScreenScore, and X-Score), were carried out. The systematic naming of consensus scoring strategies was also proposed. Our results demonstrate that choosing the most appropriate type of consensus score is essential for model selection in computational docking; although the vote-by-number strategy was an effective selection method, the number-by-number and rank-by-number strategies were more appropriate when computational tractability was taken into account. By incorporating these consensus scores into the FlexX program, reasonable complex models can be obtained more efficiently than those selected by independent FlexX scores. These strategies might also improve the scoring of other docking programs, and more-effective structure-based drug design should result from these improvements.     

Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance

Anilinopyrazoles as CDK2 inhibitors can adopt multiple binding modes depending on the substituents at the 5-position of the pyrazole ring, based on CDK2/cyclin A crystallographic studies. Three commercially available docking programs, FlexX, GOLD, and LigandFit, were tested with 63 anilinopyrazole analogues in an attempt to reproduce the binding modes observed in the crystal structures. Each docking program gave different ligand conformations depending on the scoring or energy functions used. FlexX/drugscore, GOLD/chemscore, and LigandFit/plp were the best combinations of each docking program in reproducing the ligand conformations observed in the crystal structures. The 63 analogues were divided into two groups, type-A and type-B, depending on the substituent at the 5-position of the pyrazole ring. Although an alternate binding mode, observed in a crystal structure of one type-B compound, could not be reproduced with any of the above docking/scoring combinations, GOLD, with a template constraint based on the crystal structure coordinates, was able to reproduce the pose. As for type-A compounds, all docking conditions yielded similar poses to those observed in crystal structures. When predicting activities by scoring programs, the combination of docking with LigandFit/plp and scoring with LIGSCORE1_CFF gave the best correlation coefficient (r=0.60) between experimental pIC50 values and top-ranked rescores of 30 poses of each compound. With regard to type-A compounds, the correlation was 0.69. However, when 11 compounds, whose top-ranked rescored poses did not demonstrate the correct binding modes in reference to the crystal structure, were removed, the correlation rose to 0.75. Consequently, predicting activity on the basis of correct binding modes was found to be reliable.     

Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking

We have performed a comparative assessment of several programs for flexible molecular docking: DOCK 4.0, FlexX 1.8, AutoDock 3.0, GOLD 1.2 and ICM 2.8. This was accomplished using two different studies: docking experiments on a data set of 37 protein-ligand complexes and screening a library containing 10,037 entries against 11 different proteins. The docking accuracy of the methods was judged based on the corresponding rank-one solutions. We have found that the fraction of molecules docked with acceptable accuracy is 0.47, 0.31, 0.35, 0.52 and 0.93 for, respectively, AutoDock, DOCK, FlexX, GOLD and ICM. Thus ICM provided the highest accuracy in ligand docking against these receptors. The results from the other programs are found to be less accurate and of approximately the same quality. A speed comparison demonstrated that FlexX was the fastest and AutoDock was the slowest among the tested docking programs. The database screening was performed using DOCK, FlexX and ICM. ICM was able to identify the original ligands within the top 1% of the total library in 17 cases. The corresponding number for DOCK and FlexX was 7 and 8, respectively. We have estimated that in virtual database screening, 50% of the potentially active compounds will be found among approximately 1.5% of the top scoring solutions found with ICM and among approximately 9% of the top scoring solutions produced by DOCK and FlexX.     

Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints

Improving the scoring functions for small molecule-protein docking is a highly challenging task in current computational drug design. Here we present a novel consensus scoring concept for the prediction of binding modes for multiple known active ligands. Similar ligands are generally believed to bind to their receptor in a similar fashion. The presumption of our approach was that the true binding modes of similar ligands should be more similar to each other compared to false positive binding modes. The number of conserved (consensus) interactions between similar ligands was used as a docking score. Patterns of interactions were modeled using ligand receptor interaction fingerprints. Our approach was evaluated for four different data sets of known cocrystal structures (CDK-2, dihydrofolate reductase, HIV-1 protease, and thrombin). Docking poses were generated with FlexX and rescored by our approach. For comparison the CScore scoring functions from Sybyl were used, and consensus scores were calculated thereof. Our approach performed better than individual scoring functions and was comparable to consensus scoring. Analysis of the distribution of docking poses by self-organizing maps (SOM) and interaction fingerprints confirmed that clusters of docking poses composed of multiple ligands were preferentially observed near the native binding mode. Being conceptually unrelated to commonly used docking scoring functions our approach provides a powerful method to complement and improve computational docking experiments.     

Assessment of docking poses: interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC) versus crystal structure deviations

Six docking programs (FlexX, GOLD, ICM, LigandFit, the Northwestern University version of DOCK, and QXP) were evaluated in terms of their ability to reproduce experimentally observed binding modes (poses) of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular targets. The accuracy of a pose was assessed in two ways: First, the RMS deviation of the predicted pose from the crystal structure was calculated. Second, the predicted pose was compared to the experimentally observed one regarding the presence of key interactions with the protein. The latter assessment is referred to as interactions-based accuracy classification (IBAC). In a number of cases significant discrepancies were found between IBAC and RMSD-based classifications. Despite being more subjective, the IBAC proved to be a more meaningful measure of docking accuracy in all these cases.     

酪氨酸蛋白磷酸酯酶1B抑制剂的分子对接和三维定量构效关系研究

用一种柔性分子对接方法(FlexX)将12个2-草酰胺苯甲酸类抑制剂和酪氨酸蛋白磷酸酯酶(PTP1B)活性口袋进行分子对接,对接程序预测的抑制剂和酶之间的相互作用能与抑制活性之间有很好的相关性(非线性相关系数R²达0.859),这说明对接结果可以比较准确地预测抑制剂和PTP1B之间的结合模式.然后,将33个同类抑制剂的骨架叠合在分子对接预测的结合构象上,用比较分子力场分析方法(CoMFA)对其进行三维定量活性构效关系研究,得到的CoMFA模型具有很好的统计相关性(交互验证回归系数q²为0.650),并可以准确地预测测试集6个化合物的活性(平均标准偏差为0.177).同时,由CoMFA模型得出的抑制剂改造信息与用FlexX预测的结合模式是一致的,进一步证明我们预测的结合模式是正确的.为研究这类抑制剂和PTP1B的结合模式及对抑制剂进行结构改造提供了信息.     

A novel scoring function for molecular docking

We present a novel scoring function for docking of small molecules to protein binding sites. The scoring function is based on a combination of two main approaches used in the field, the empirical and knowledge-based approaches. To calibrate the scoring function we used an iterative procedure in which a ligand's position and its score were determined self-consistently at each iteration. The scoring function demonstrated superiority in prediction of ligand positions in docking tests against the commonly used Dock, FlexX and Gold docking programs. It also demonstrated good accuracy of binding affinity prediction for the docked ligands.     

Construction and test of ligand decoy sets using MDock: community structure-activity resource benchmarks for binding mode prediction

Two sets of ligand binding decoys have been constructed for the community structure-activity resource (CSAR) benchmark by using the MDock and DOCK programs for rigid- and flexible-ligand docking, respectively. The decoys generated for each complex in the benchmark thoroughly cover the binding site and also contain a certain number of near-native binding modes. A few scoring functions have been evaluated using the ligand binding decoy sets for their abilities of predicting near-native binding modes. Among them, ITScore achieved a success rate of 86.7% for the rigid-ligand decoys and 79.7% for the flexible-ligand decoys, under the common definition of a successful prediction as root-mean-square deviation <2.0 ? from the native structure if the top-scored binding mode was considered. The decoy sets may serve as benchmarks for binding mode prediction of a scoring function, which are available at the CSAR Web site ( http://www.csardock.org/).     

Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions

Scoring forms a major obstacle to the success of any docking study. In general, fast scoring functions perform poorly when used to determine the relative affinity of ligands for their receptors. In this study, the objective was not to rank compounds with confidence but simply to identify a scoring method which could provide a 4-fold hit enrichment in a screening sample over random selection. To this end, LigandFit, a fast shape matching docking algorithm, was used to dock a variety of known inhibitors of type 4 phosphodiesterase (PDE4B) into its binding site determined crystallographically for a series of pyrazolopyridine inhibitors. The success of identifying good poses with this technique was explored through RMSD comparisons with 19 known inhibitors for which crystallographic structures were available. The effectiveness of five scoring functions (PMF, JAIN, PLP2, LigScore2, and DockScore) was then evaluated through consideration of the success in enriching the top ranked fractions of nine artificial databases, constructed by seeding 1980 inactive ligands (pIC50 < 5) with 20 randomly selected inhibitors (pIC50 > 6.5). PMF and JAIN showed high average enrichment factors (greater than 4 times) in the top 5-10% of the ranked databases. Rank-based consensus scoring was then investigated, and the rational combination of 3 scoring functions resulted in more robust scoring schemes with (cScore)-DPmJ (consensus score of DockScore, PMF, and JAIN) and (cScore)-PPmJ (PLP2, PMF, and JAIN) yielding particularly good results. These cScores are believed to be of greater general application. Finally, the analysis of the behavior of the scoring functions across different chemotypes uncovered the inherent bias of the docking and scoring toward compounds in the same structural family as that employed for the crystal structure, suggesting the need to use multiple versions of the binding site for more successful virtual screening strategies.     

Identifying the binding mode of a molecular scaffold

We describe a method for docking of a scaffold-based series and present its advantages over docking of individual ligands, for determining the binding mode of a molecular scaffold in a binding site. The method has been applied to eight different scaffolds of protein kinase inhibitors (PKI). A single analog of each of these eight scaffolds was previously crystallized with different protein kinases. We have used FlexX to dock a set of molecules that share the same scaffold, rather than docking a single molecule. The main mode of binding is determined by the mode of binding of the largest cluster among the docked molecules that share a scaffold. Clustering is based on our 'nearest single neighbor' method [J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43 (2003) 208-217]. Additional criteria are applied in those cases in which more than one significant binding mode is found. Using the proposed method, most of the crystallographic binding modes of these scaffolds were reconstructed. Alternative modes, that have not been detected yet by experiments, could also be identified. The method was applied to predict the binding mode of an additional molecular scaffold that was not yet reported and the predicted binding mode has been found to be very similar to experimental results for a closely related scaffold. We suggest that this approach be used as a virtual screening tool for scaffold-based design processes.     

Evaluating docked complexes with the HINT exponential function and empirical atomic hydrophobicities

Summary Methods that predict geometries of ligands binding to receptor molecules can facilitate ligand discovery and yield information on the factors governing complementarity. Here, the use of atomic hydrophobicities in evaluating binding modes has been examined with four ligand-receptor complexes of known structure. In each system, hundreds of hypothetical binding orientations were generated with DOCK and evaluated using the HINT (Hydropathic INTeractions) exponential function and atomic hydrophobic constants. In three of the four systems, the experimental binding mode received the best HINT score; in the fourth system, the experimental binding mode scored only slightly lower than a similar, apparently reasonable orientation. The HINT function may be generally useful as a scoring method in molecular docking.     

Optimizing fragment and scaffold docking by use of molecular interaction fingerprints

Protein-ligand interaction fingerprints have been used to postprocess docking poses of three ligand data sets: a set of 40 low-molecular-weight compounds from the Protein Data Bank, a collection of 40 scaffolds from pharmaceutically relevant protein ligands, and a database of 19 scaffolds extracted from true cdk2 inhibitors seeded in 2230 scaffold decoys. Four popular docking tools (FlexX, Glide, Gold, and Surflex) were used to generate poses for ligands of the three data sets. In all cases, scoring by the similarity of interaction fingerprints to a given reference was statistically superior to conventional scoring functions in posing low-molecular-weight fragments, predicting protein-bound scaffold coordinates according to the known binding mode of related ligands, and screening a scaffold library to enrich a hit list in true cdk2-targeted scaffolds.     

Alternative to consensus scoring--a new approach toward the qualitative combination of docking algorithms

Since the development of the first docking algorithm in the early 1980s a variety of different docking approaches and tools has been created in order to solve the docking problem. Subsequent studies have shown that the docking performance of most tools strongly depends on the considered target. Thus it is hard to choose the best algorithm in the situation at hand. The docking tools FlexX and AutoDock are among the most popular programs for docking flexible ligands into target proteins. Their analysis, comparison, and combination are the topics of this study. In contrast to standard consensus scoring techniques which integrate different scoring algorithms usually only by their rank, we focus on a more general approach. Our new combined docking workflow-AutoxX-unifies the interaction models of AutoDock and FlexX rather than combining the scores afterward which allows interpretability of the results. The performance of FlexX, AutoDock, and the combined algorithm AutoxX was evaluated on the basis of a test set of 204 structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). AutoDock and FlexX show a highly diverse redocking accuracy at the different complexes which assures again the usefulness of taking several docking algorithms into account. With the combined docking the number of complexes reproduced below an rmsd of 2.5 A could be raised by 10. AutoxX had a strong positive effect on several targets. The highest performance increase could be found when redocking 20 protein-ligand complexes of alpha-thrombin, plasmepsin, neuraminidase, and d-xylose isomerase. A decrease was found for gamma-chymotrypsin. The results show that--applied to the right target-AutoxX can improve the docking performance compared to AutoDock and FlexX alone.     

3D QSAR selectivity analyses of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: insights for the design of isozyme selective inhibitors

A 3D QSAR selectivity analysis of carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitors using a data set of 87 CA inhibitors is reported. After ligand minimization in the binding pockets of CA I, CA II, and CA IV isoforms, selectivity CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D QSAR models have been derived by taking the affinity differences (DeltapKi) with respect to two CA isozymes as independent variables. Evaluation of the developed 3D QSAR selectivity models allows us to determine amino acids in the respective CA isozymes that possibly play a crucial role for selective inhibition of these isozymes. We further combined the ligand-based 3D QSAR models with the docking program AUTODOCK in order to screen for novel CA inhibitors. Correct binding modes are predicted for various CA inhibitors with respect to known crystal structures. Furthermore, in combination with the developed 3D QSAR models we could successfully estimate the affinity of CA inhibitors even in cases where the applied scoring function failed. This novel strategy to combine AUTODOCK poses with CoMFA/CoMSIA 3D QSAR models can be used as a guideline to assess the relevance of generated binding modes and to accurately predict the binding affinity of newly designed CA inhibitors that could play a crucial role in the treatment of pathologies such as tumors, obesity, or glaucoma.     

Sulfonylurea类ALS/AHAS抑制剂作用方式的分子对接研究和新抑制剂的虚拟筛选

采用Dock5和Autodock3的组合, 从乙酰乳酸合成酶(ALS)的晶体结构出发, 对五个磺酰脲分子和三个类磺酰脲分子与ALS的相互作用方式进行了详细的分子对接研究, 并结合对ALS与氯嘧磺隆(类磺酰脲)共结晶的复合物晶体结构的分析得出了一个简化的药效团模型, 与前人利用其它手段得到的药效团模型一致. 结合此药效团模型并根据sulfonylurea类分子与ALS的作用机理, 我们对425个具有不同除草和杀虫作用的已知农药和ALS进行了分子对接研究和筛选, 从中发现了一些可能对ALS有抑制作用的农药分子. 此结果可以很好地解释这类农药的结构和活性的关系, 对设计、开发新ALS抑制剂的先导化合物提供依据和指导.