氢化物发生原子荧光光谱法测定污泥中的砷

用氢化物发生原子荧光光谱法测定污泥中的砷.分别用微波消解、湿法消解两种方法处理污泥样品，微波消解效果优于湿法消解，在最佳实验条件下，砷的检出限为0.04μg/L，回收率为94．2％～104.8％，测定结果的相对标准偏差为2．22％～4．23％。     

微波消解-氢化物发生原子荧光法

采用微波消解样品，氢化物发生原子荧光法，测定了牡蛎壳中微量砷的含量；通过试验，优化了微波消解的条件和仪器的最佳工作参数；结果表明该法具有快速、简便、准确等特点，砷的检出限为0.05μg/L，线性范围0-32μg/L；样品分析结果的相对标准偏差为0.44%(n=6)，加标回收率98％。     

氢化物发生-原子荧光法测定海产品中的砷和汞

采用硝酸-高氯酸混合酸湿法消解处理样品,以氢化物发生原子荧光法测定了饶平海域柘林湾中不同养殖场的牡蛎、鱼、虾等海产品中的砷和汞。在最佳测试条件下测得砷和汞的检出限为0.020μg/L和0.009μg/L,相对标准偏差为0.04%~0.11%,回收率为99.2%~106.2%和92.4%~108.0%。     

湿法消解虾粉的条件对总砷含量测定的影响

湿法消解虾粉氢化物原子荧光法测定总砷含量的不同消解条件对测定结果有极大的影响。由于虾粉中的砷主要以有机砷形态存在,普通的消解条件难以将有机砷彻底消解成无机态,因而检测结果极低。实验表明:采用硝酸-高氯酸-硫酸体系并在电热板+电炉加热条件下有机砷能够彻底消解,采用硝酸-高氯酸体系并在电热板+电炉加热条件下有机砷能够部分消解,而用电热板加热无论采用何种消解体系有机砷均不能消解成无机态砷。     

微波消解-原子荧光光谱法同时测定鱼体中砷和汞

为建立微波消解-原子荧光光谱法同时测定鱼体中砷和汞的测定方法,采用微波消解方法,双道原子荧光光谱法同时测定了鱼体中砷和汞的含量。结果表明,砷与汞的线性范围分别为0.2~2.0μg/L,0.0~50.0μg/L;相关系数分别为r=0.999 8和r=0.999 5;砷回收率为96.5%~101.5%之间,相对标准偏差(n=11)为1.22%,检出限为0.004 2μg/L;汞回收率为98.6%~103.0%,相对标准偏差(n=11)为0.67%,检出限为0.009 6μg/L。用该法测定鱼类中砷和汞,方法灵敏度高、操作简便快速、结果准确可靠。     

服药动物排泄物中微量砷的微波消解-氢化物发生原子荧光法测定

采用微波消解的样品预处理技术和氢化物发生-原子荧光法,测定了服药(安宫牛黄丸、雄黄、二硫化二砷)实验动物大鼠不同时间的粪便排泄物中砷含量,初步研究了砷的排泄情况;通过实验,确定了微波消解样品的条件,优化了仪器的最佳工作参数;以硝酸和高氯酸混合液作消解液,硫脲和抗坏血酸为混合预还原掩蔽剂,4．0％硼氢化钾溶液作还原剂,测定结果满意;表明该法快速、简便、准确;砷的检出限为0．06μg/L,线性范围为0～20μg/L;为安宫牛黄丸的减毒机理、药效和毒性的科学评价提供了一定的依据。     

湿法消解/干灰化-氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱法测定基围虾中总砷

建立了一种采用湿法消解/干灰化-氢化物-原子荧光光谱法分析测定基围虾中总砷的方法。样品中加入6mL硝酸,冷消解120min,电热板160℃预消解至澄清,并赶酸至约1mL,加入灰化辅助剂硝酸镁,550℃马弗炉灰化5min。盐酸溶解灰分,采用氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱法分析测定。通过优化仪器条件,砷含量在0.0-20.0mg.L-1范围内,标准曲线相关线性优于0.999,检出限为0.025mg.L_^-1,相对标准偏差RSD为2.54%-3.13%,加标回收率为93.6%-103.0%。本方法结果准确,可用于基围虾中总砷测定。     

三种不同前处理方法对标准奶粉中锰含量测定的影响

分别采用干法灰化、高压消解和湿法消解3种不同的前处理方法消解标准奶粉,用石墨炉原子吸收法测定奶粉中锰含量。结果表明,干法灰化为奶粉前处理的最佳方法,经干法灰化后测定的锰质量分数为0.485μg/g,RSD为0.66%,加标回收率为90.4%~96.7%。     

氢化物发生原子荧光光谱法测定污水中的砷

用HNO3-HClO4混合酸消解污水样,采用氢化物发生原子荧光光谱法测定污水中的砷含量。在最佳实验务件下,线性范围为0～40μg/L,检出限为0．4μg/L,测定结果的相对标准偏差小于4％,加标回收率为91．5％～100．9％。     

微波消解—原子荧光光谱法定量测定山梨糖醇液中的砷

应用微波消解技术和原子荧光光谱仪以氢化物发生原子荧光光谱法测定了山梨糖醇液中砷的研究。对微波消解条件以及氢化物发生条件进行了探讨。在选定的最佳条件下方法的检出限为0．22ng/mL,线性范围为0－80ng/mL。10次测定的相对标准偏差为0．49％－2．16％,回收率为94．8％－102．2％。该结果与国际推荐的湿法消解分析结果相对照,无显著性差异。     

Arsenic determination in certifiable color additives by dry ashing followed by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry

The preparations of digested samples of certifiable color additives by dry ashing and wet digestion for arsenic analysis by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) were compared. The dry ashing technique was based on the preparation used in ASTM D4606-86 for determination of As and Se in coal. The acid digestion method used nitric and sulfuric acids heated by microwaves in sealed vessels. The digested color additives were analyzed for As by using hydride generated from sodium borohydride mixed with the acidified solution on a flow injection system leading to an atomic absorption spectrometer. Dry ashing was preferable to wet digestion because wet digestion yielded poor recoveries of added As. Dry ashing followed by hydride generation AAS gave determination limits of 0.5 ppm As in the color additives. At a specification level of 3 ppm As, the precision of the method using dry ashing was +/- 0.4 ppm (95% confidence interval).     

ICP-AES测定铀污染土壤植物中铀的研究

采用电感耦合等离子体发射光谱(ICP-AES)对铀污染土壤植物中铀的测定方法进行了研究.在λU385.958 nm处,选择了仪器的最佳工作条件,考察了酸度和常见共存元素对测定的干扰情况,并且对比了干灰化消解和湿式消解对测定的影响.研究发现2%硝酸溶液为最佳介质,干扰离子对测定没有显著影响,干灰化消解比湿式消解得彻底.在选定条件下,方法检出限为0.18 mg·L-1,测定下限为0.61 mg·L-1,5.0000 mg·L-1的铀标准溶液的相对标准偏差RSD(n=10)为0.81%,方法回收率为96.2%～106.2%.该方法操作简单,快速.结果表明,用ICP-AES测定铀污染土壤植物样品中的铀是可行的.     

Comparison of ten digestion procedures for the determination of arsenic in soils by hydride-generation atomic absorption spectrometry

Ten different digestion methods were investigated for the determination of arsenic in soils by hydride-generation atomic absorption spectrometry. These methods included a dry ashing/digestion, several acid-leaching procedures, and digestions in a pressure decomposition vessel or a Kjeldahl apparatus. A certified reference sample was analysed and the results obtained for five other soil samples were compared with the data obtained by spectrophotometry. A nitric/sulphuric acid digestion was the most suitable. A brief interference study is reported.     

TXRF法测定松花粉中的9种生命元素

建立了微波消解前处理,全反射X射线荧光法(TXRF)同时测定松花粉中K、Ca、Ti、Mn、Fe、Ni、Cu、Zn和Rb9种生命元素含量的分析方法.松花粉原料经过微波消解前处理后,采用全反射X射线荧光光谱净计数、QXAS分析软件解谱和单一内标法进行定量分析.比较了干灰化法、湿消解法和微波消解法3种前处理方法的效果,并确立微波消解法作为样品前处理方法.用微波消解- TXRF法测定了花粉标准物质中的上述9种元素,并计算得到其仪器检出限(LLD)为0.002～0.054 mg/L,方法检出限(LDM)为0.004～0.122 mg/kg.TXRF法测定各元素的相对标准偏差(RSDs)为1.0％～5.5％.该方法操作简单、样品用量少、检出限低,对实际样品松花粉的测定结果与ICP - MS法无显著性差异.     

Determination of essential metals in complete diet feed by flow injection and flame atomic absorption spectrometry

A prior study of different sample pre-treatments for the determination of metallic elements in complete diet feeds was performed in order to choose the most suitable for these samples. The studied pre-treatment were: acid extraction (lixiviation), wet digestion (on microwave oven) and dry ashing mineralization (calcination). Lixiviation (acid extraction) with hydrochloric acid was selected due to its accuracy, fast and simple pre-treatment procedure. Due of the different levels of concentration of the metallic elements in the samples, the same manifold was used but with small variations. Copper (with on-line pre-concentration by chelating Chelex-100 resin), calcium (with on-line dilution) and iron determination gave suitable accuracy and precision and required a little time for analysis. Five different samples were analyzed by flow injection and the results were contrasted with dry ashing mineralization in batch procedure and with the labeled contents.     

Revisitation of mineralization modes for arsenic and selenium determinations in environmental samples

Mineralization procedures for arsenic and selenium analysis are usually limited to wet digestion methods owing to high volatility of these analytes. On the other hand, variable amounts of silicon in some types of samples imply elaborated mineralization procedures to liberate analytes which may be retained in an insoluble residue. Consequently, methods for such material generally include an hydrofluoric step followed by an evaporation to dryness. This type of mineralization is most easily accomplished using a dry ashing procedure. For plant analysis, a well validated and readily applicable dry ashing method is used for a long time in several laboratories but up today one could suppose that As and Se determinations cannot be performed after such a type of mineralization. Surprisingly, it has been observed that for plant samples these analytes are detected even after a calcination at 450 degrees C. The general usefulness of a dry ashing method for analysis of all other analytes (main, minor and trace elements) incitates us to also verify As and Se recoveries. Results obtained in this work indicate clearly that plants of terrestrial origin may be mineralized using dry ashing procedure without As and Se losses. This statement was confirmed by analyses of several reference terrestrial plant samples (RMs) and laboratory control samples. Another confirmation was given by the direct graphite furnace analysis of the same plant samples but in slurried form (SS-ETAAS). As a direct consequence, As and Se analysis in terrestrial plants no more necessitates a separate preparation methodology. On the other hand, significant losses of As and Se were observed for aquatic plants, e.g. algaes. For the analysis of this type of samples, a separate wet digestion procedure remains unavoidable if the determination of As and Se has to be considered. Also some preparation procedures were tested for As and Se-analysis of soil and sediment reference samples. In these cases the wet digestion with a mixture of nitric, perchloric and hydrofluoric acids seems to remain the best alternative.     

Preparation of conducting electrodes from biological samples for multi-element trace analysis by spark-source mass spectrometry or emission spectrometry

Four decomposition procedures frequently used for biological material (dry ashing, open wet digestion, wet digestion in a teflon bomb and low-temperature ashing) are optimized for the conversion of biological samples to conducting electrodes suitable for multi-element trace determinations by spark-source mass spectrometry or emission spectrometry. The optimized procedures are evaluated with respect to contamination, retention and preconcentration of the trace elements, homogeneity of the electrodes and precision of the final results. Both dry-ashing methods are prone to losses by volatilization; simple dry ashing suffers from contamination problems during electrode preparation. Wet digestion gives better precision; digestion with nitric/sulfuric acids in an open flask is the method of choice for most elements being simpler and giving lower blanks than the bomb method.     

Determination of calcium, potassium, manganese, iron, copper and zinc levels in representative samples of two onion cultivars using total reflection X-ray fluorescence and ultrasound extraction procedure

The chemical characterization of onion cultivar samples is an important tool for the enhancement of their productivity due to the fact that chemical composition is closed related to the quality of the products. A new sample preparation procedure for elemental characterization is proposed, involving the acid extraction of the analytes from crude samples by means of an ultrasonic bath, avoiding the required digestion of samples in vegetable tissue analysis. The technique of total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) was successfully applied for the simultaneous determination of the elements Ca, K, Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn. The procedure was compared with the wet ashing and dry ashing procedures for all the elements using multivariate analysis and the Scheffé test. The technique of flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was employed for comparison purposes and accuracy evaluation of the proposed analysis method. A good agreement between the two techniques was found when using the dry ashing and ultrasound leaching procedures. The levels of each element found for representative samples of two onion cultivars (Yellow Granex PRR 502 and 438 Granex) were also compared by the same method. Levels of K, Mn and Zn were significantly higher in the 438 Granex cultivar, while levels of Ca, Fe and Cu were significantly higher in the Yellow Granex PRR 502 cultivar.     

ICP–AES法同时检测生蚝中铅、铜、镉、铬、铁含量时3种样品前处理方法比较

采用干法、湿法和微波消解法处理珠海生蚝样品,用电感耦合等离子体发射光谱仪在谱线Pb 220.3 nm,Cu 324.7 nm,Cd 228.8 nm,Cr 283.5 nm,Fe 259.9 nm下测定样品中铅、铜、镉、铬、铁5种重金属元素的含量。结果表明,珠海市4个养殖基地的生蚝重金属含量均在国标限量范围内。铅、铜、镉、铬、铁各元素线性相关系数分别为0.999 8,0.999 4,0.999 9,0.999 2,0.997 8,检出限分别为0.020,0.014,0.001,0.036,0.120 mg/kg。干法、湿法、微波消解法的加标回收率分别为72.8%~99.3%,88.0%~102.0%,89.0%~103.0%。微波消解处理样品,ICP–AES法同时测定4种样品中5种重金属的含量,其测定结果的相对标准偏差均小于17%。微波消解–ICP–AES适合生蚝中铅、铜、镉、铬、铁含量的快速测定。