Advanced Mathematical Thinking

In this article we propose the following definition for advanced mathematical thinking: Thinking that requires deductive and rigorous reasoning about mathematical notions that are not entirely accessible to us through our five senses. We argue that this definition is not necessarily tied to a particular kind of educational experience; nor is it tied to a particular level of mathematics. We also give examples to illustrate the distinction we make between advanced mathematical thinking and elementary mathematical thinking. In particular, we discuss which kind of thinking may be required depending on the size of a mathematical problem, including problems involving infinity, and the types of models that are available.     

Advancing Mathematical Activity: A Practice-Oriented View of Advanced Mathematical Thinking

The purpose of this article is to contribute to the dialogue about the notion of advanced mathematical thinking by offering an alternative characterization for this idea, namely advancing mathematical activity. We use the term advancing (versus advanced) because we emphasize the progression and evolution of students' reasoning in relation to their previous activity. We also use the term activity, rather than thinking. This shift in language reflects our characterization of progression in mathematical thinking as acts of participation in a variety of different socially or culturally situated mathematical practices. For these practices, we emphasize the changing nature of students' mathematical activity and frame the process of progression in terms of multiple layers of horizontal and vertical mathematizing.     

An Exploratory Study of College Students' Views of Mathematical Thinking in a Historical Approach Calculus Course

Heuristic training alone is not enough for developing one's mathematical thinking. One missing component is a mathematical point of view. This study reports findings regarding outcomes of a historical approach calculus course to foster Taiwanese college students' views of mathematical thinking. This study consisted of 3 stages. During the initial phase, 44 engineering majors' views on mathematical thinking were tabulated by an open-ended questionnaire, and 9 randomly selected students were invited to participate in follow-up interviews. Students then received an 18-week historical approach calculus course in which mathematical concepts were problematized to challenge their intuition-based empirical beliefs about doing mathematics. Near the end of the semester, all participants answered the identical questionnaire, and we interviewed the same students to pinpoint any shifts in their views on mathematical thinking. We found that participants were more likely to value logical sense, creativity, and imagination in doing mathematics. Further, students were leaning toward a conservative attitude toward certainty of mathematical knowledge. Participants' focus seemingly shifted from mathematics as a product to mathematics as a process.     

Attributes of Instances of Student Mathematical Thinking that Are Worth Building on in Whole-Class Discussion

This study investigated attributes of 278 instances of student mathematical thinking during whole-class interactions that were identified as having high potential, if made the object of discussion, to foster learners’ understanding of important mathematical ideas. Attributes included the form of the thinking (e.g., question vs. declarative statement), whether the thinking was based on earlier work or generated in the moment, the accuracy of the thinking, and the type of thinking (e.g., sense-making). Findings illuminate the complexity of identifying student thinking worth building on during whole-class discussion and provide insight into important attributes of these high potential instances that could be used to help teachers more easily recognize them. Implications for researching, learning, and enacting the teaching practice of building on student mathematical thinking are discussed.     

An Exploratory Study of College Students' Views of Mathematical Thinking in a Historical Approach Calculus Course

Heuristic training alone is not enough for developing one's mathematical thinking. One missing component is a mathematical point of view. This study reports findings regarding outcomes of a historical approach calculus course to foster Taiwanese college students' views of mathematical thinking. This study consisted of 3 stages. During the initial phase, 44 engineering majors' views on mathematical thinking were tabulated by an open-ended questionnaire, and 9 randomly selected students were invited to participate in follow-up interviews. Students then received an 18-week historical approach calculus course in which mathematical concepts were problematized to challenge their intuition-based empirical beliefs about doing mathematics. Near the end of the semester, all participants answered the identical questionnaire, and we interviewed the same students to pinpoint any shifts in their views on mathematical thinking. We found that participants were more likely to value logical sense, creativity, and imagination in doing mathematics. Further, students were leaning toward a conservative attitude toward certainty of mathematical knowledge. Participants' focus seemingly shifted from mathematics as a product to mathematics as a process.     

Instances of mathematical thinking among low attaining students in an ordinary secondary classroom

This paper is a report of a classroom research project whose aim was to find out whether low attaining 14-year-old students of mathematics would be able to think mathematically at a level higher than recall and reproduction during their ordinary classroom mathematics activities. Analysis of classroom interactive episodes revealed many instances of mathematical thinking of a kind which was not normally exploited, required or expected in their classes. Five episodes are described, comparing the students’ thinking to that usually described as “advanced.” In particular, some episodes suggest the power of a type of prompt which can be generalized as “going across the grain.”     

Developing a theory of mathematical growth

In this paper I formulate a basic theoretical framework for the ways in which mathematical thinking grows as the child develops and matures into an adult. There is an essential need to focus on important phenomena, to name them and reflect on them to build rich concepts that are both powerful in use and yet simple to connect to other concepts. The child begins with human perception and action, linking them together in a coherent way. Symbols are introduced to denote mathematical processes (such as addition) that can be compressed as mathematical concepts (such as sum) to give symbols that operate flexibly as process and concept (procept). Knowledge becomes more sophisticated through building on experiences met before, focussing on relationships between properties, leading eventually to the advanced mathematics of concept definition and deduction. This gives a theoretical framework in which three modes of operation develop and grow in sophistication from conceptual-embodiment using thought experiments, to proceptual-symbolism using computation and symbol manipulation, then on to axiomatic-formalism based on concept definitions and formal proof.     

On levels in arrangements and voronoi diagrams

This paper gives efficient, randomized algorithms for the following problems: (1) construction of levels of order 1 tok in an arrangement of hyperplanes in any dimension and (2) construction of higher-order Voronoi diagrams of order 1 tok in any dimension. A new combinatorial tool in the form of a mathematical series, called a θ series, is associated with an arrangement of hyperplanes inR ^d . It is used to study the combinatorial as well as algorithmic complexity of the geometric problems under consideration.     

Commentary: Linking epistemology and semio-cognitive modeling in visualization

To situate the contributions of these research articles on visualization as an epistemological learning tool, we have employed mathematical, cognitive and functional criteria. Mathematical criteria refer to mathematical content, or more precisely the areas to which they belong: whole numbers (numeracy), algebra, calculus and geometry. They lead us to characterize the “tools” of visualization according to the number of dimensions of the diagrams used in experiments. From a cognitive point of view, visualization should not be confused with a visualization “tool,” which is often called “diagram” and is in fact a semiotic production. To understand how visualization springs from any diagram, we must resort to the notion of figural unity. It results methodologically in the two following criteria and questions: (1) In a given diagram, what are the figural units recognized by the students? (2) What are the mathematically relevant figural units that pupils should recognize? The analysis of difficulties of visualization in mathematical learning and the value of “tools” of visualization depend on the gap between the observations for these two questions. Visualization meets functions that can be quite different from both a cognitive and epistemological point of view. It can fulfill a help function by materializing mathematical relations or transformations in pictures or movements. This function is essential in the early numerical activities in which case the used diagrams are specifically iconic representations. Visualization can also fulfill a heuristic function for solving problems in which case the used diagrams such as graphs and geometrical figures are intrinsically mathematical and are used for the modeling of real problems. Most of the papers in this special issue concern the tools of visualization for whole numbers, their properties, and calculation algorithms. They show the semiotic complexity of classical diagrams assumed as obvious to students. In teaching experiments or case studies they explore new ways to introduce them and make use by students. But they lie within frameworks of a conceptual construction of numbers and meaning of calculation algorithms, which lead to underestimating the importance of the cognitive process specific to mathematical activity. The other papers concern the tools of mathematical visualization at higher levels of teaching. They are based on very simple tasks that develop the ability to see 3D objects by touch of 2D objects or use visual data to reason. They remain short of the crucial problem of graphs and geometrical figures as tools of visualization, or they go beyond that with their presupposition of students' ability to coordinate them with another register of semiotic representation, verbal or algebraic.     

Theorems that admit exceptions, including a remark on Toulmin

It is a plausible assumption that proof-novices try to make sense of the meaning of mathematical proof out of the perspective of every day thinking. In every day thinking, however, the domain of objects to which a general statement refers is not completely and definitely determined. Thus the very notion of a “universally valid statement” is not as obvious as it might seem. The phenomenon of a statement with an indefinite domain of reference can also be found in the history of mathematics when authors spoke of “theorems that admit exceptions”. Without having understood and accepted the theoretical nature of the idea of a universally valid statement the logical distinctions between, for example an implication and its converse loose their meaning for the learner. This might explain some disappointing findings of empirical research. Following a proposal by Inglis, Mejia–Ramos and Simpson it is suggested that in modelling mathematical thinking in proof situations the full scheme of Toulmin should be used including qualifications and rebuttals rather than a reduced version as is frequently done.     

A case for combinatorics: A research commentary

In this commentary, we make a case for the explicit inclusion of combinatorial topics in mathematics curricula, where it is currently essentially absent. We suggest ways in which researchers might inform the field’s understanding of combinatorics and its potential role in curricula. We reflect on five decades of research that has been conducted since a call by Kapur (1970) for a greater focus on combinatorics in mathematics education. Specifically, we discuss the following five assertions: 1) Combinatorics is accessible, 2) Combinatorics problems provide opportunities for rich mathematical thinking, 3) Combinatorics fosters desirable mathematical practices, 4) Combinatorics can contribute positively to issues of equity in mathematics education, and 5) Combinatorics is a natural domain in which to examine and develop computational thinking and activity. Ultimately, we make a case for the valuable and unique ways in which combinatorics might effectively be leveraged within K-16 curricula.     

Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functions

In advanced mathematical thinking, proving and refuting are crucial abilities to demonstrate whether and why a proposition is true or false. Learning proofs and counterexamples within the domain of continuous functions is important because students encounter continuous functions in many mathematics courses. Recently, a growing number of studies have provided evidence that students have difficulty with mathematical proofs. Few of these research studies, however, have focused on undergraduates’ abilities to produce proofs and counterexamples in the domain of continuous functions. The goal of this study is to contribute to research on student productions of proofs and counterexamples and to identify their abilities and mathematical understandings. The findings suggest more attention should be paid to teaching and learning proofs and counterexamples, as participants showed difficulty in writing these statements. More importantly, the analysis provides insight into the design of curriculum and instruction that may improve undergraduates’ learning in advanced mathematics courses.     

Mathematical poetic structures: The sound shape of collaboration

This paper outlines a new method of mathematical discourse analysis focused on identifying poetic structures in students’ mathematical conversations. Following the linguistic anthropology tradition inspired by Roman Jakobson, poetic structures refer to any conversational repetition of sounds, words or syntax; this repetition draws attention to the form of the message. In mathematical conversations, poetic structures can express patterns, rhythms, similarities or dissimilarities associated with a task. Methodological dilemmas associated with identifying and representing poetic structures and pragmatic responses are highlighted. An analysis of a nine minute algebraic problem-solving conversation revealed eight types of mathematical poetic structures that collectively assisted all of the students’ vital mathematical insights. The paper aims to demonstrate that poetic analysis of mathematical conversations can bridge the illusory distinction between mathematical discourse and mathematical reasoning.     

Trends in the evolution of models & modeling perspectives on mathematical learning and problem solving

In this paper we briefly outline the models and modelling (M&M) perspective of mathematical thinking and learning relevant for the 21st century. Models and modeling (M&M) research often investigates the nature of understandings and abilities that are needed in order for students to be able to use what they have (presumably) learned in the classroom in “real life” situations beyond school Nonetheless, M&M perspectives evolved out of research on concept development more than research on problem solving; and, rather than being preoccupied with the kind of word problems emphasized in textbooks and standardized tests, we focus on (simulations of) problem solving “in the wild.” Also, we give special attention to the fact that, in a technology-basedage of information, significant changes are occurring in the kinds of “mathematical thinking” that is coming to be needed in the everyday lives of ordinary people in the 21^st century—as well as in the lives of productive people in future-oriented fields that are heavy users of mathematics, science, and technology.     

Developing prospective teachers’ covariational reasoning through a model development sequence

Forming part of a wider research study, the current study investigated prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ ways of covariational reasoning on tasks involving simultaneously changing quantities. As the introductory theme of a larger unit on derivative, a model development sequence on covariational reasoning was designed and experimented with 20 participants in a mathematical modeling course offered to prospective teachers. The participants’ developing abilities of covariational reasoning were documented under three categories: (i) identifying the variables, (ii) ways of coordinating the variables, and (iii) ways of quantifying the rate of change. The results revealed significant improvement in the prospective teachers’ ways of identifying and coordinating the variables, and in quantifying the rate of change. Moreover, the results indicated that preference for a particular way of thinking in identifying and coordinating the variables determined the prospective teachers’ way of quantifying the rate of change and thereby their level of covariational reasoning.     

The intangible task – a revelatory case of teaching mathematical thinking in Japanese elementary schools

This paper deals with the nature of teaching mathematical thinking and presents a case study of a single Japanese lesson where the characteristics of mathematical thinking and the teaching thereof are identified in relation to multiplication. The raison d’être for this teaching is questioned and investigated by looking at how multiplication is described in the curriculum and representative textbook material. It is seen how Japanese teachers are institutionally conditioned to incorporate mathematical thinking in the context of multiplication, something which may appear in contrast to other countries. The lesson is analysed using the notion of praxeologies and didactic co-determination conceptualised in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic.