Developing a theory of mathematical growth

In this paper I formulate a basic theoretical framework for the ways in which mathematical thinking grows as the child develops and matures into an adult. There is an essential need to focus on important phenomena, to name them and reflect on them to build rich concepts that are both powerful in use and yet simple to connect to other concepts. The child begins with human perception and action, linking them together in a coherent way. Symbols are introduced to denote mathematical processes (such as addition) that can be compressed as mathematical concepts (such as sum) to give symbols that operate flexibly as process and concept (procept). Knowledge becomes more sophisticated through building on experiences met before, focussing on relationships between properties, leading eventually to the advanced mathematics of concept definition and deduction. This gives a theoretical framework in which three modes of operation develop and grow in sophistication from conceptual-embodiment using thought experiments, to proceptual-symbolism using computation and symbol manipulation, then on to axiomatic-formalism based on concept definitions and formal proof.     

基于概念的数学系统及其结构

随着科学技术的发展，应用定量分析的数学方法已从自然科学发展到社会科学、思堆科学．为了处理这些问题的需要，许多学者建立了多种数学模型和数学方法，这些模型和方法都直接或间接地涉及到概念，因此归纳并研究基于概念的数学方法显得很有必要。本文应用系统的方法，尝试络出数学系境的概念，并建立了基于概念的数学系统及其结构的一般方法，期望更多的学者予以关注和研究。     

Advanced Mathematical Thinking

In this article we propose the following definition for advanced mathematical thinking: Thinking that requires deductive and rigorous reasoning about mathematical notions that are not entirely accessible to us through our five senses. We argue that this definition is not necessarily tied to a particular kind of educational experience; nor is it tied to a particular level of mathematics. We also give examples to illustrate the distinction we make between advanced mathematical thinking and elementary mathematical thinking. In particular, we discuss which kind of thinking may be required depending on the size of a mathematical problem, including problems involving infinity, and the types of models that are available.     

Problem solving heuristics,affect, and discrete mathematics

It has been suggested that activities in discrete mathematics allow a kind of new beginning for students and teachers. Students who have been “turned off” by traditional school mathematics, and teachers who have long ago routinized their instruction, can find in the domain of discrete mathematics opportunities for mathematical discovery and interesting, nonroutine problem solving. Sometimes formerly low-achieving students demonstrate mathematical abilities their teachers did not know they had. To take maximum advantage of these possibilities, it is important to know what kinds of thinking during problem solving can be naturally evoked by discrete mathematical situations—so that in developing a curriculum, the objectives can include pathways to desired mathematical reasoning processes. This article discusses some of these ways of thinking, with special attention to the idea of “modeling the general on the particular.” Some comments are also offered about students' possible affective pathways and structures.     

Mathematics in Children's Thinking

The human mind inevitably comprehends the world in mathematical terms (among others). Children's informal and invented mathematics contains on an implicit level many of the mathematical ideas that teachers want to promote on a formal and explicit level. These ideas may be innate, constructed for the purpose of adaptation, or picked up from an environment that is rich in mathematical structure, regardless of culture. Teachers should attempt to uncover the mathematical ideas contained in their students' thinking because much, but not all, of the mathematics curriculum is immanent in children's informal and invented knowledge. This mathematical perspective requires a focus not only on the child's constructive process but also on the mathematical content underlying the child's thinking. Teachers then can use these crude ideas as a foundation on which to construct a significant portion of classroom pedagogy. In doing this, teachers should recognize that children's invented strategies are not an end in themselves. Instead, the ultimate goal is to facilitate children's progressive mathematization of their immanent ideas. Children need to understand mathematics in deep, formal, and conventional ways.     

The role of examples in the learning of mathematics and in everyday thought processes

The purpose of this paper is to present a view of three central conceptual activities in the learning of mathematics: concept formation, conjecture formation and conjecture verification. These activities also take place in everyday thinking, in which the role of examples is crucial. Contrary to mathematics, in everyday thinking examples are, very often, the only tool by which we can form concepts and conjectures, and verify them. Thus, relying on examples in these activities in everyday thought processes becomes immediate and natural. In mathematics, however, we form concepts by means of definitions and verify conjectures by mathematical proofs. Thus, mathematics imposes on students certain ways of thinking, which are counterintuitive and not spontaneous. In other words, mathematical thinking requires a kind of inhibition from the learners. The question is to what extent this goal can be achieved. It is quite clear that some people can achieve it. It is also quite clear that many people cannot achieve it. The crucial question is what percentage of the population is interested in achieving it or, moreover, what percentage of the population really cares about it.     

Mathematics in Children's Thinking

The human mind inevitably comprehends the world in mathematical terms (among others). Children's informal and invented mathematics contains on an implicit level many of the mathematical ideas that teachers want to promote on a formal and explicit level. These ideas may be innate, constructed for the purpose of adaptation, or picked up from an environment that is rich in mathematical structure, regardless of culture. Teachers should attempt to uncover the mathematical ideas contained in their students' thinking because much, but not all, of the mathematics curriculum is immanent in children's informal and invented knowledge. This mathematical perspective requires a focus not only on the child's constructive process but also on the mathematical content underlying the child's thinking. Teachers then can use these crude ideas as a foundation on which to construct a significant portion of classroom pedagogy. In doing this, teachers should recognize that children's invented strategies are not an end in themselves. Instead, the ultimate goal is to facilitate children's progressive mathematization of their immanent ideas. Children need to understand mathematics in deep, formal, and conventional ways.     

A case for combinatorics: A research commentary

In this commentary, we make a case for the explicit inclusion of combinatorial topics in mathematics curricula, where it is currently essentially absent. We suggest ways in which researchers might inform the field’s understanding of combinatorics and its potential role in curricula. We reflect on five decades of research that has been conducted since a call by Kapur (1970) for a greater focus on combinatorics in mathematics education. Specifically, we discuss the following five assertions: 1) Combinatorics is accessible, 2) Combinatorics problems provide opportunities for rich mathematical thinking, 3) Combinatorics fosters desirable mathematical practices, 4) Combinatorics can contribute positively to issues of equity in mathematics education, and 5) Combinatorics is a natural domain in which to examine and develop computational thinking and activity. Ultimately, we make a case for the valuable and unique ways in which combinatorics might effectively be leveraged within K-16 curricula.     

The relevance of advanced mathematics studies to expertise in secondary school mathematics teaching: practitioners’ views

This study investigates the different ways by which secondary school mathematics teachers view how advanced mathematics studies are relevant to expertise in classroom instruction. Data sources for this study included position papers and written notes from a group interview of 15 Israeli teachers who studied in a special master’s program, of which advanced mathematics courses comprise a sizeable share. Data analysis was iterative and comparative, aiming at identifying and characterizing teachers’ different perspectives. Overall, all participating teachers thought that the advanced mathematics studies in the program were relevant to their teaching of secondary school mathematics. Moreover, teachers specifically mentioned the importance of studying contemporary mathematics from research mathematicians. All teachers pointed out at least one specific feature that they viewed as relevant to their work: advanced mathematics courses (1) as a resource for teaching secondary school mathematics, (2) for improving understanding about what mathematics is, and (3) for reminding teachers what learning mathematics feels like.     

Mathematisches Denken in der Linearen Algebra

How can first years students learn to think and act mathematically by learning Linear Algebra? We want to present an approach that considers reflection of mathematical acting and its connections to general thinking to be an important part of learning. By understanding mathematics as a specific conventionalization of general thinking, patterns of general thinking can become the starting point for learning mathematics. This points out the specific contribution that mathematics can give to describe reality. By example of Linear Algebra, we discuss the common ground and differences between thinking in mathematics and in non-mathematical subjects. Based on this discussion, we analyse why and how these reflections can be objects of learning.     

Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education

This article focuses on a form of instructional design that is deemed fitting for reform mathematics education. Reform mathematics education requires instruction that helps students in developing their current ways of reasoning into more sophisticated ways of mathematical reasoning. This implies that there has to be ample room for teachers to adjust their instruction to the students' thinking. But, the point of departure is that if justice is to be done to the input of the students and their ideas built on, a well-founded plan is needed. Design research on an instructional sequence on addition and subtraction up to 100 is taken as an instance to elucidate how the theory for realistic mathematics education (RME) can be used to develop a local instruction theory that can function as such a plan. Instead of offering an instructional sequence that “works,” the objective of design research is to offer teachers an empirically grounded theory on how a certain set of instructional activities can work. The example of addition and subtraction up to 100 is used to clarify how a local instruction theory informs teachers about learning goals, instructional activities, student thinking and learning, and the role of tools and imagery.     

Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education

This article focuses on a form of instructional design that is deemed fitting for reform mathematics education. Reform mathematics education requires instruction that helps students in developing their current ways of reasoning into more sophisticated ways of mathematical reasoning. This implies that there has to be ample room for teachers to adjust their instruction to the students' thinking. But, the point of departure is that if justice is to be done to the input of the students and their ideas built on, a well-founded plan is needed. Design research on an instructional sequence on addition and subtraction up to 100 is taken as an instance to elucidate how the theory for realistic mathematics education (RME) can be used to develop a local instruction theory that can function as such a plan. Instead of offering an instructional sequence that "works," the objective of design research is to offer teachers an empirically grounded theory on how a certain set of instructional activities can work. The example of addition and subtraction up to 100 is used to clarify how a local instruction theory informs teachers about learning goals, instructional activities, student thinking and learning, and the role of tools and imagery.     

Instances of mathematical thinking among low attaining students in an ordinary secondary classroom

This paper is a report of a classroom research project whose aim was to find out whether low attaining 14-year-old students of mathematics would be able to think mathematically at a level higher than recall and reproduction during their ordinary classroom mathematics activities. Analysis of classroom interactive episodes revealed many instances of mathematical thinking of a kind which was not normally exploited, required or expected in their classes. Five episodes are described, comparing the students’ thinking to that usually described as “advanced.” In particular, some episodes suggest the power of a type of prompt which can be generalized as “going across the grain.”     

Moving toward shared realities through empathy in mathematical modeling: An ecological systems theory approach

The mathematics education community has routinely called for mathematics tasks to be connected to the real world. However, accomplishing this in ways that are relevant to students’ lived experiences can be challenging. Meanwhile, mathematical modeling has gained traction as a way for students to learn mathematics through real-world connections. In an open problem to the mathematics education community, this paper explores connections between the mathematical modeling and the nature of what is considered relevant to students. The role of empathy is discussed as a proposed component for consideration within mathematical modeling so that students can further relate to real-world contexts as examined through the lens of Ecological Systems Theory. This is contextualized through a classroom-tested example entitled “Tiny Homes as a Solution to Homelessness” followed by implications and conclusions as they relate to mathematics education.     

引入自我调节发展大学生数学思维的研究

自我调节学习是按照现代教育理论发展起来的一种教育实践活动.分析了其理论基础和发展现状,针对大学生思维发展中辩证思维占优势、创造思维呈上升趋势等显著特点,结合高等数学自身以动态为主,高容量、深广度,较初等数学有质的飞跃的事实,分析了高等数学与初等数学的思维差异,阐明了自我调节运用于高等数学课程教学中的可能性和必要性,并通过教学实验研究,从获得的第一手材料证实了自我调节手段运用于高等数学教学中的可行性,从而也表明了它是促进学生数学思维发展的强有力的工具.     

Toward the problem-centered classroom: trends in mathematical problem solving in Japan

In this paper, I summarize the influence of mathematical problem solving on mathematics education in Japan. During the 1980–1990s, many studies had been conducted under the title of problem solving, and, therefore, even until now, the curriculum, textbook, evaluation and teaching have been changing. Considering these, it is possible to identify several influences. They include that mathematical problem solving helped to (1) enable the deepening and widening of our knowledge of the students’ processes of thinking and learning mathematics, (2) stimulate our efforts to develop materials and effective ways of organizing lessons with problem solving, and (3) provide a powerful means of assessing students’ thinking and attitude. Before 1980, we had a history of both research and practice, based on the importance of mathematical thinking. This culture of mathematical thinking in Japanese mathematics education is the foundation of these influences.     

Preservice Elementary Teachers' Use of Mathematics in a Project‐Based Science Approach

The use of a project‐based science (PBS) approach to teaching encourages students to integrate mathematics and science in meaningful ways as they create projects. As a beginning study of how students use mathematics in such an approach, an analysis of 23 projects developed by preservice elementary teachers enrolled in an elementary science course was conducted. Findings showed that students made a number of different types of mathematical errors and underutilized data representation and summary forms. Implications included the importance of developing methods for supporting the use of mathematical tools in utilizing a project‐based approach and considering ways that such tools mediate scientific thinking.     

Is it a function? Generalizing from single- to multivariable settings

Generalizing is a hallmark of mathematical thinking. The term ‘generalization’ is used to mean both the process of generalizing and the product of that process. This paper reports on five calculus students’ generalizing activity and what they generalized about multivariable functions. The study makes two contributions. The first is a fine-grained, actor-oriented characterization of the ways undergraduates generalized. This adds to knowledge in two areas: the use of the actor-oriented perspective and generalization in advanced mathematics. The second contribution is the products of students’ generalizing: what they generalized about what it means for a multivariable relation to represent a function). This adds to the literature about student reasoning regarding multivariable topics by characterizing the powerful ways of reasoning students possess pre-instruction.