The ostensive dimension through the lenses of two didactic approaches

The paper presents how two different theories—the APC-space and the ATD—can frame in a complementary way the semiotic (or ostensive) dimension of mathematical activity in the way they approach teaching and learning phenomena. The two perspectives coincide in the same subject: the importance given to ostensive objects (gestures, discourses, written symbols, etc.) not only as signs but also as essential tools of mathematical practices. On the one hand, APC-space starts from a general semiotic analysis in terms of “semiotic bundles” that is to be integrated into a more specific epistemological analysis of mathematical activity. On the other hand, ATD proposes a general model of mathematical knowledge and practice in terms of “praxeologies” that has to include a more specific analysis of the role of ostensive objects in the development of mathematical activities in the classroom. The articulation of both theoretical perspectives is proposed as a contribution to the development of suitable frames for Networking Theories in mathematics education.     

Young students’ subjective interpretations of mathematical diagrams: elements of the theoretical construct “frame-based interpreting competence”

During the last few decades several studies have showed that mathematical visual aids are not at all self-explanatory. Nevertheless, students do make sense of those representations spontaneously and—as a matter of course—cannot avoid their own sense-making. Further, the function of visual aids as “re-presentation” of a given structure is complemented through an epistemological function to explore mathematical structures and generate new meaning. But in which way do socially learned interpreting schemes (frames) influence children’s subjective interpretations of mathematical diagrams? The CORA project investigates which frames can be reconstructed in young pupils’ interpretations of visual diagrams. This paper presents central ideas, theoretical background and—by means of short sequences from pre- and post-interviews—first aspects of “frame-based interpreting competence”. We describe children’s subjective frames in a range between “object-oriented” (focus on the diagram’s visible elements) and “system-oriented” (focus on relation between those elements).     

“No! He starts walking backwards!”: interpreting motion graphs and the question of space, place and distance

This article deals with the interpretation of motion Cartesian graphs by Grade 8 students. Drawing on a sociocultural theoretical framework, it pays attention to the discursive and semiotic process through which the students attempt to make sense of graphs. The students’ interpretative processes are investigated through the theoretical construct of knowledge objectification and the configuration of mathematical signs, gestures, and words they resort to in order to achieve higher levels of conceptualization. Fine-grained video and discourse analyses offer an overview of the manner in which the students’ interpretations evolve into more condensed versions through the effect of what is called in the article “semiotic contractions” and “iconic orchestrations.”     

Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: the productive notion of mathematics laboratories

In our research work, we have looked at the way in which artefacts become, for teachers as well as for students, instruments of their mathematical activity. The issues related to the use of tools and technologies in mathematical education are now widely considered. A look to history highlights the different ways in which the same questions have been studied at different times and in different places. This suggests that the contribution of artefacts to mathematics learning should be considered in terms of various contexts. Our “visits” to these contexts will be guided by the coordination of two main theoretical frameworks, the instrumental approach and the semiotic mediation approach from the perspective of mathematics laboratory. This journey through history and schooling represents a good occasion to address some questions: Are there “good” contexts in which to develop mathematical instruments? Are there “good” teaching practices which assist students’ instrumental geneses and construct mathematical meanings? How is it possible to promote such teaching practices? Some study cases are discussed.     

Students constructing meaning for the number line in small-group discussions: negotiation of essential epistemological issues of visual representations

In mathematics classroom interaction, the multiple meanings of mathematical visual diagrams are often ignored; instead, depending on the given situation, they are read in a well-defined and unitary way. Mathematical visual representations are thus used even less in their epistemological function for learning, but more as pre-given subject matter. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate opportunities for negotiating and clarifying differences, dealing with a great variety of ways of interpreting visual diagrams that are brought into focus in interaction. Theory-based qualitative analyses of two exemplifying video episodes of small-group discussions negotiating their ideas on the topic “number line” show differences of meaning and the importance of conventions followed by mathematical deductions. Two mutually exclusive teacher behaviors within the communicative acts, reconstructed as a dominating way of instruction and a moderating way of focusing, are identified.     

Coordinating visualizations of polysemous action: values added for grounding proportion

We contribute to research on visualization as an epistemic learning tool by inquiring into the didactical potential of having students visualize one phenomenon in accord with two different partial meanings of the same concept. 22 Grade 4–6 students participated in a design study that investigated the emergence of proportional-equivalence notions from mediated perceptuomotor schemas. Working as individuals or pairs in tutorial clinical interviews, students solved non-symbolic interaction problems that utilized remote-sensing technology. Next, they used symbolic artifacts interpolated into the problem space as semiotic means to objectify in mathematical register a variety of both additive and multiplicative solution strategies. Finally, they reflected on tensions between these competing visualizations of the space. Micro-ethnographic analyses of episodes from three paradigmatic case studies suggest that students reconciled semiotic conflicts by generating heuristic logico-mathematical inferences that integrated competing meanings into cohesive conceptual networks. These inferences hinged on revisualizing additive elements multiplicatively. Implications are drawn for rethinking didactical design for proportions.     

Characterizing Interaction with Visual Mathematical Representations

This paper presents a characterization of computer-based interactions by which learners can explore and investigate visual mathematical representations (VMRs). VMRs (e.g., geometric structures, graphs, and diagrams) refer to graphical representations that visually encode properties and relationships of mathematical structures and concepts. Currently, most mathematical tools provide methods by which a learner can interact with these representations. Interaction, in such cases, mediates between the VMR and the thinking, reasoning, and intentions of the learner, and is often intended to support the cognitive tasks that the learner may want to perform on or with the representation. This paper brings together a diverse set of interaction techniques and categorizes and describes them according to their common characteristics, goals, intended benefits, and features. In this way, this paper aims to provide a preliminary framework to help designers of mathematical cognitive tools in their selection and analysis of different interaction techniques as well as to foster the design of more innovative interactive mathematical tools. An effort is made to demonstrate how the different interaction techniques developed in the context of other disciplines (e.g., information visualization) can support a diverse set of mathematical tasks and activities involving VMRs.     

Embodied Semiotic Activities and Their Role in the Construction of Mathematical Meaning of Motion Graphs

This paper examines the relation between bodily actions, artifact-mediated activities, and semiotic processes that students experience while producing and interpreting graphs of two-dimensional motion in the plane. We designed a technology-based setting that enabled students to engage in embodied semiotic activities and experience two modes of interaction: 2D freehand motion and 2D synthesized motion, designed by the composition of single variable function graphs. Our theoretical framework combines two perspectives: the embodied approach to the nature of mathematical thinking and the Vygotskian notion of semiotic mediation. The article describes in detail the actions, gestures, graph drawings, and verbal discourse of one pair of high school students and analyzes the social semiotic processes they experienced. Our analysis shows how the computerized artifacts and the students’ gestures served as means of semiotic mediation. Specifically, they supported the interpretation and the production of motion graphs; they mediated the transition between an individual’s meaning of mathematical signs and culturally accepted mathematical meaning; and they enable linking bodily actions with formal signs.     

Learning about multiplication by comparing algorithms: “One times one,but actually they are ten times ten”

Multiplication algorithms in primary school are still frequently introduced with little attention to meaning. We present a case study focusing on a third grade class that engaged in comparing two algorithms and discussing “why they both work”. The objectives of the didactical intervention were to foster students' development of mathematical meanings concerning multiplication algorithms, and their development of an attitude to judge and compare the value and efficiency of different algorithms. Underlying hypotheses were that it is possible to promote the simultaneous unfolding of the semiotic potential of two algorithms, considered as cultural artifacts, with respect to the objectives of the didactical intervention, and to establish a fruitful synergy between the two algorithms. As results, this study sheds light onto the new theoretical construct of “bridging sign”, illuminating students’ meaning-making processes involving more than one artifact; and it provides important insight into the actual unfolding of the hypothesized potential of the algorithms.     

Beliefs and engagement structures: behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning

Beliefs influencing students’ mathematical learning and problem solving are structured and intertwined with larger affective and cognitive structures. This theoretical article explores a psychological concept we term an engagement structure, with which beliefs are intertwined. Engagement structures are idealized, hypothetical constructs, analogous in many ways to cognitive structures. They describe complex “in the moment” affective and social interactions as students work on conceptually challenging mathematics. We present engagement structures in a self-contained way, paying special attention to their theoretical justification and relation to other constructs. We suggest how beliefs are characteristically woven into their fabric and influence their activation. The research is based on continuing studies of middle school students in inner-city classrooms in the USA.     

Inductive and Deductive Justification of Knowledge: Flexible Judgments Underneath Stable Beliefs in Teacher Education

Personal epistemological beliefs are considered to play an important role for processes of learning and teaching. However, research on personal epistemology is confronted with theoretical issues as there is conflicting evidence regarding the structure, stability, and context-dependence of epistemological beliefs. We give evidence how theoretical and methodological issues can partly be resolved by distinguishing between relatively stable “epistemological beliefs” and situation-specific “epistemological judgments.” A qualitative content analysis of a series of semistructured interviews (study 1) with pre-service teachers, teachers, and teacher educators as well as a statistical analysis of pre-service teachers’ extensive answers in questionnaires (study 2), both on the topic of “mathematical discovery,” reveal not only beliefs of the participants but also different qualities of judgments. Therefore, in further research both aspects of beliefs should be considered in a more differentiated manner when categorizing belief structures.     

Diagram Literacy in Preservice Math Teachers, Computer Science Majors, and Typical Undergraduates: The Case of Matrices, Networks, and Hierarchies

According to the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000), children need to learn how to create and use mathematical diagrams to represent and reason about phenomena in the world. The author proposes a model of diagram literacy that includes six types of knowledge required for diagrammatic competence - implicit, construction, similarity, structural, metacognitive, and translational. A study is reported that examined college students' diagram literacy for three interrelated mathematical diagrams - matrices, networks, and hierarchies. Three groups of students participated: preservice, secondary-level, math teachers; computer science majors; and typical undergraduates. The results of the study are reassuring in some ways concerning the level of diagram literacy possessed by students at the culmination of current K through 12 instruction and by teachers of future secondary students. However, the results also point to areas in which preservice math teachers should be better prepared if the goals for students' diagram literacy are to be met.     

Diagram Literacy in Preservice Math Teachers,Computer Science Majors,and Typical Undergraduates: The Case of Matrices,Networks, and Hierarchies

According to the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000), children need to learn how to create and use mathematical diagrams to represent and reason about phenomena in the world. The author proposes a model of diagram literacy that includes six types of knowledge required for diagrammatic competence - implicit, construction, similarity, structural, metacognitive, and translational. A study is reported that examined college students' diagram literacy for three interrelated mathematical diagrams - matrices, networks, and hierarchies. Three groups of students participated: preservice, secondary-level, math teachers; computer science majors; and typical undergraduates. The results of the study are reassuring in some ways concerning the level of diagram literacy possessed by students at the culmination of current K through 12 instruction and by teachers of future secondary students. However, the results also point to areas in which preservice math teachers should be better prepared if the goals for students' diagram literacy are to be met.     

The Mathematics Writer's Checklist: The Development of a Preliminary Assessment Tool for Writing in Mathematics

The use of writing as a pedagogical tool to help students learn mathematics is receiving increased attention at the college level ( Meier & Rishel, 1998 ), and the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM, 2000) built a strong case for including writing in school mathematics, suggesting that writing enhances students' mathematical thinking. Yet, classroom experience indicates that not all students are able to write well about mathematics. This study examines the writing of a two groups of students in a college‐level calculus class in order to identify criteria that discriminate “;successful” vs. “;unsuccessful” writers in mathematics. Results indicate that “;successful” writers are more likely than “;unsuccessful” writers to use appropriate mathematical language, build a context for their writing, use a variety of examples for elaboration, include multiple modes of representation (algebraic, graphical, numeric) for their ideas, use appropriate mathematical notation, and address all topics specified in the assignment. These six criteria result in The Mathematics Writer's Checklist, and methods for its use as an instructional and assessment tool in the mathematics classroom are discussed.     

Relationships between variables in learning and modes of presenting mathematics concepts

The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships between figural and symbolic aptitudes and figural and symbolic modes of presenting mathematics concepts to secondary school students. One hundred and sixty students were measured on 11 aptitudes (five figural, five symbolic, and one semantic) from Guilford's structure‐of‐intellect cube and were randomly assigned to either a figural or symbolic instructional mode for learning the mathematical concept of function. Subjects studied the function concept using one of two sets (figural or symbolic) of programmed instructional materials during three consecutive mathematics classes. Immediately following instruction a learning test was given, which was followed by a retention test 1 week later. Data analysis showed that females scored significantly higher than males on all dependent measures, and their scores were independent of instructional mode. For male students figural instruction was superior to the symbolic mode. Significant relationships were found between instructional mode and the figural aptitude divergent production of figural systems. The symbolic aptitude cognition of symbolic systems was a predictor of success for subjects studying symbolic materials. Cognition of semantic systems was a good predictor of success for students receiving the figural instructional treatment.     

A locus for transnational exchanges: European mathematical journals for students and teachers, 1860s–1914

While there were a few mathematical journals aimed at teachers and students as early as the 1840s, it was only in the late 19th century that they became more numerous in Europe. This article is based on the analysis of a corpus of European mathematical journals published between the 1860s and World War I, selected in the first place because they were aimed at high school teachers and high school or/and first two years university students, which are often referred to as “intermediate journals”. All these journals had focused on the teaching of mathematics and, as such, they were shaped by the educational context of the country in which they were published. However, leafing through theses journals, one is struck by the fact that the mathematics they published was in fact highly commensurable, and can see that they were the locus of transnational exchanges on mathematical knowledge. This article shows that several aspects of “internationalisation” were in fact at stake in mathematical journals for students: making knowledge from elsewhere available and of publicizing to the whole world the mathematics produced in one country; making people from different countries collaborate. Finally, it focuses on the effects of transnational exchanges between journals for teachers and students: what was the mathematical knowledge that was circulated through them, and in what respect was it different from that published in other mathematical journals?     

Europe in symplex diagrams: From statistical tables to insight

Two-dimensional “symplex” diagrams will be presented to provide deeper insight into quantitative similarities and differences between the member states of the European Union. This paper serves two purposes: (i) It shall help to provide a better perception of quantitative European relations. (ii) It shall demonstrate the cognitive power of two-dimensional “symplex” diagrams. A collection of 12 diagrams will be used as samples.     

Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns

This paper discusses the content and structure of generalization involving figural patterns of middle school students, focusing on the extent to which they are capable of establishing and justifying complicated generalizations that entail possible overlap of aspects of the figures. Findings from an ongoing 3-year longitudinal study of middle school students are used to extend the knowledge base in this area. Using pre-and post-interviews and videos of intervening teaching experiments, we specify three forms of generalization involving such figural linear patterns: constructive standard; constructive nonstandard; and deconstructive; and we classify these forms of generalization according to complexity based on student work. We document students’ cognitive tendency to shift from a figural to a numerical strategy in determining their figural-based patterns, and we observe the not always salutary consequences of such a shift in their representational fluency and inductive justifications.