Preparation of57Fe enriched K4[Fe(CN)6] and K3[Fe(CN)6]

A simple method to prepare⁵⁷Fe enriched K₄[Fe(CN)₆] and K₃[Fe(CN)₆] is described. The yields of the products are much better than those reported in the literature so far. The enrichment is essential for⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer investigation in a variety of Prussiate type complexes and other inorganic compounds which are conveniently prepared from K₄[Fe(CN)₆] and K₃[Fe(CN)₆]. K₄[Fe(CN)₆] was obtained by reacting freshly prepared Fe(OH)₃ with glacial acetic acid and treating with iron acetate in boiling aqueous solution of KCN. The novel feature of the procedure to obtain K₃[Fe(CN)₆] is that the oxidation of K₄[Fe(CN)₆] has been carried out in the solid state by passing chlorine gas over the powdered specimen. K₃[Fe(CN)₆] was crystallised from alkaline solution of this oxidised powder. The compounds were characterised by Mössbauer spectroscopy.     

Local deposition and characterisation of K2Co[Fe(CN)6] and K2Ni[Fe(CN)6] by scanning electrochemical microscopy

Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) is used to form local deposits of different Prussian blue analogs on macroscopic surfaces of gold and glassy carbon. Dissolution of Co and Ni sacrificial ultramicroelectrodes (UMEs) generates divalent cations in the gap between the UME and the macroscopic specimen electrode. Co²⁺ or Ni²⁺ precipitate with [Fe(CN)₆]^4– formed by reduction of [Fe(CN)₆]^3– at the macroelectrode. By moving the UME while generating Co²⁺ or Ni²⁺, lines can be "drawn" with a width of 130 μm. The line width can be adjusted by reagent concentration and translation speed of the UME. Different pulse programs allow the formation of ring-shaped structures. The deposited hexacyanoferrate microstructures show catalytic activity for the reduction of Fe³⁺ which was imaged in the feedback and generation-collection modes of the SECM. Electronic Publication     

Alkoxo‐Verbindungen des dreiwertigen Eisen: Synthese und Charakterisierung von [Fe2(OtBu)6], [Fe2Cl2(OtBu)4], [Fe2Cl4(OtBu)2] und [N(nBu)4]2[Fe6OCl6(OMe)12]

Alkoxo Compounds of Iron(III): Syntheses and Characterization of [Fe₂(OtBu)₆], [Fe₂Cl₂(OtBu)₄], [Fe₂Cl₄(OtBu)₂] and [N(nBu)₄]₂[Fe₆OCl₆(OMe)₁₂] The reaction of iron(III)chloride in diethylether with sodium tert‐butylat yielded the homoleptic dimeric tert‐‐butoxide Fe₂(OtBu)₆ ( 1 ). The chloro‐derivatives [Fe₂Cl₂(OtBu)₄] ( 2 ), and [Fe₂Cl₄(OtBu)₂] ( 3 ) could be synthesized by ligand exchange between 1 and iron(III)chloride. Each of the molecules 1 , 2 , and 3 consists of two edge‐sharing tetrahedrons, with two tert‐butoxo‐groups as μ₂‐bridging ligands. For the synthesis of the alkoxides 1 , 2 , and 3 diethylether plays an important role. In the first step the dietherate of iron(III)chloride FeCl₃(OEt₂)₂ ( 4 ) is formed. The reaction of iron(III)chloride with tetrabutylammonium methoxide in methanol results in the formation of a tetrabutylammonium methoxo‐chloro‐oxo‐hexairon cluster [N(nBu)₄]₂[Fe₆OCl₆(OMe)₁₂] ( 5 ). Crystal structure data: 1 , triclinic, P1¯, a = 9.882(2) Å, b = 10.523(2) Å, c = 15.972(3) Å, α = 73.986(4)°, β = 88.713(4)°, γ = 87.145(4)°, V = 1594.4(5) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.146 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.044; 2 , monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 11.134(2) Å, b = 10.141(2) Å, c = 12.152(2) Å und β = 114.157(3)°, V = 1251.8(4) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.377 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.0581; 3 , monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 6.527(2) Å, b = 11.744(2) Å, c = 10.623(2), β = 96.644(3)°, V = 808.8(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.641 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.0174; 4 , orthorhombic, Iba2, a = 23.266(5) Å, b = 9.541(2) Å, c = 12.867(3) Å, V = 2856(2) ų, Z = 8, d_c = 1.444 gcm^—1, R₁ = 0.0208; 5 , trigonal, P3₁, a = 13.945(2) Å, c = 30.011(6) Å, V = 5054(2) ų, Z = 6, d_c = 1.401 gcm^—1; R_c = 0.0494.     

Das gemischtvalente ternäre Oxoferrat(II,III) K3[Fe2O4] – eine aufgefüllte Variante des K2[Fe2O4]‐Typs

The Mixed‐Valent Oxoferrate(II,III) K₃[Fe₂O₄] – A Stuffed Variant of the K₂[Fe₂O₄] Type of Structure K₃[Fe₂O₄] has been obtained by tempering “Cs₃K₃CdO₄” in sealed Fe containers (36 d at 450–480 °C) as dark red transparent single crystals of rectangular shape. The structure determination (IPDS diffractometer data, MoKα, 1891 collected reflections, 234 symmetry independent, R1 = 0.033, wR2 = 0.088) confirms the space group Fddd; a = 596.11(9), b = 1140.3(1), c = 1717.9(3) pm; Z = 8. K₃[Fe₂O₄] exhibits a structure with [FeO₄] tetrahedra connected via corners leading to a three‐dimensional network closely related to the KFeO₂ type of structure. From the oxidation at 520 °C of iron metal with KO₂ in the presence of Na₂O black single crystal of K₂[Fe₂O₄] have been obtained. K₂[Fe₂O₄] crystallizes in the space group Pbca with Z = 8 and a = 559.18(7), b = 1122.1(1), c = 1592.8(2) pm (IPDS diffractometer data, MoKα, collected refelctions: 9543, 1213 symmetry independent, R1 = 0.043, wR2 = 0.102).     

Fe L-edge XAS studies of K4[Fe(CN)6] and K3[Fe(CN)6]: a direct probe of back-bonding

Distinct spectral features at the Fe L-edge of the two compounds K3[Fe(CN)6] and K4[Fe(CN)6] have been identified and characterized as arising from contributions of the ligand pi orbitals due to metal-to-ligand back-bonding. In addition, the L-edge energy shifts and total intensities allow changes in the ligand field and effective nuclear charge to be determined. It is found that the ligand field term dominates the edge energy shift. The results of the experimental analysis were compared to BP86 DFT calculations. The overall agreement between the calculations and experiment is good; however, a larger difference in the amount of pi back-donation between Fe(II) and Fe(III) is found experimentally. The analysis of L-edge spectral shape, energy shift, and total intensity demonstrates that Fe L-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy provides a direct probe of metal-to-ligand back-bonding.     

Influence of the intermolecular interaction on photo-induced spin-transition of [Fe(R-pap)<Subscript>2</Subscript>]X

Summary Iron(III) spin-crossover complexes [Fe(pap)₂]ClO₄^. H₂O (1), [Fe(pap)₂]BF₄^. H₂O (2), [Fe(pap)₂]PF₆^. CH₃OH (3), [Fe(CH₃-pap)₂]ClO₄^. H₂O (4), [Fe_0.5Al_0.5(pap)₂]ClO₄^. CH₃OH (5) and [Fe_0.25Al_0.75(pap)₂] ClO₄^. CH₃OH (6)were prepared andthe spin transition behaviors of the complexes have been studied from magnetic susceptibility and M?ssbauer spectroscopy measurements. The magnetic properties of light-induced metastable state are measured using Hg-Xe light source. T_1/2is temperature at which the populations of the high-spin and low-spin species are fifty-fifty. Metastable HS is produced by light irradiation at 5 K. T(LIESST) is the temperature at which the populations of the metastable high-spin species decrease to one half and cooperativity factor Cis defined as the parameter which presents the strength of cooperativity. The value of T(LIESST) decreases as T_1/2increases and the plots of T(LIESST) vs. Cshow linear correlation. The effect of cooperativity of the complexes on the relaxations in solid was confirmed for the iron(III) complexes.     

Iron(II) complexes [Fe(DfgH)<Subscript>2</Subscript>(3-CONH<Subscript>2</Subscript>-Py)<Subscript>2</Subscript>] and [Fe(DfgH)<Subscript>2</Subscript>(4-COOC<Subscript>2</Subscript>H<Subscript>5</Subscript>-Py)<Subscript>2</Subscript>]: Synthesis and structures

The complexes [Fe(DfgH)₂(3-CONH₂-Py)₂] (I) and [Fe(DfgH)₂(4-COOC₂H₅-Py)₂] (II), where DfgH₂ is α-benzyl dioxime, were obtained and examined by X-ray diffraction analysis. The equatorial planes of the coordination octahedra of the metal ions consist of two monodeprotonated α-benzyl dioxime residues united through intramolecular hydrogen bonds O-H…O into a pseudomacrocyclic system. The neutral molecules 3-CONH₂-Py and 4-COOC₂H₅-Py are coordinated to the Fe²⁺ ion through the N atom of the heterocycle. Structure I is layered and structure II is molecular. Intermolecular interactions N-H…O are responsible for the formation of layers in crystal structure I.     

Alkoholyse von [Fe2(OtBu)6] als einfacher Weg zu neuen Eisen(III)‐Alkoxo‐Verbindungen: Synthesen und Kristallstrukturen von [Fe2(OtAmyl)6], [Fe5OCl(OiPr)12], [Fe5O(OiPr)13], [Fe5O(OiBu)13], [Fe5O(OCH2CF3)13], [Fe5O(OnPr)13] und [Fe9O3(OnPr)21] · iPrOH

Alcoholysis of [Fe₂(O^tBu)₆] as a Simple Route to New Iron(III)‐Alkoxo Compounds: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Fe₂(O^tAmyl)₆], [Fe₅OCl(OⁱPr)₁₂], [Fe₅O(OⁱPr)₁₃], [Fe₅O(OⁱBu)₁₃], [Fe₅O(OCH₂CF₃)₁₃], [Fe₅O(OⁿPr)₁₃], and [Fe₉O₃(OⁿPr)₂₁] · ⁿPrOH New alkoxo‐iron compounds can be synthesized easily by alcoholysis of [Fe₂(O^tBu)₆] ( 1 ). Due to different bulkyness of the alcohols used, three different structure types are formed: [Fe₂(OR)₆], [Fe₅O(OR)₁₃] and [Fe₉O₃(OR)₂₁] · ROH. We report synthesis and crystal structures of the compounds [Fe₅OCl(OⁱPr)₁₂] ( 2 ), [Fe₂(O^tAmyl)₆] ( 3 ), [Fe₅O(OⁱPr)₁₃] ( 4 ), [Fe₅O(OⁱBu)₁₃] ( 5 ), [Fe₅O(OCH₂CF₃)₁₃] ( 6 ), [Fe₉O₃(OⁿPr)₂₁] · ⁿPrOH ( 7 ) and [Fe₅O(OⁿPr)₁₃] ( 8 ). Crystallographic Data: 2 , tetragonal, P 4/n, a = 16.070(5) Å, c = 9.831(5) Å, V = 2539(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.360 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0636; 3 , monoclinic, P 2₁/c, a = 10.591(5) Å, b = 10.654(4) Å, c = 16.740(7) Å, β = 104.87(2)°, V = 1826(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.154 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0756; 4 , triclinic, , a = 20.640(3) Å, b = 21.383(3) Å, c = 21.537(3) Å, α = 82.37(1)°, β = 73.15(1)°, γ = 61.75(1)°, V = 8013(2) ų, Z = 6, d_c = 1.322 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0412; 5 , tetragonal, P 4cc, a = 13.612(5) Å, c = 36.853(5) Å, V = 6828(4) ų, Z = 4, d_c = 1.079 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0609; 6 , triclinic, , a = 12.039(2) Å, b = 12.673(3) Å, c = 19.600(4) Å, α = 93.60(1)°, β = 97.02(1)°, γ = 117.83(1)°, V = 2600(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 2.022 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0585; 7 , triclinic, , a = 12.989(3) Å, b = 16.750(4) Å, c = 21.644(5) Å, α = 84.69(1)°, β = 86.20(1)°, γ = 77.68(1)°, V = 4576(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.344 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0778; 8 , triclinic, , a = 12.597(5) Å, b = 12.764(5) Å, c = 16.727(7) Å, α = 91.94(1)°, β = 95.61(1)°, γ = 93.24(2)°, V = 2670(2) ų, Z = 2, d_c = 1.323 gcm^?3, R₁ = 0.0594.     

K6[Mn2O6] und K6[Fe2 O6] - ein Vergleich

K₆[Mn₂O₆] and K₆[Fe₂O₆] - a Comparison K₆[Mn₂O₆] has been prepared (dark-red single crystals). The structure (a = 8.88₆, b = 6.76₀, c = 11.39₄ Å, γ = 132.1°, space group P2₁, Z = 2, 1151 symmetry independent reflections hk0–hk9, R = 0.051) shows Al₂Cl₆-like anions [Mn₂O₆]^6?. By unit-cell transformation to the monoclinic setting P2₁/a (a = 6.76₀, b = 11.39₄, c = 6.63₈ Å, β = 96,9°) the structural similarity to K₆[Fe₂O₆] becomes evident. The Madelung Part of Lattice Energy, MAPLE, is calculated.     

对自旋交叉化合物[Fe(dpq)(py)2(NCS)2]·H2O·py和[Fe(dpq)(py)2(NCSe)2]·1.5H2O的研究

为了研究配体修饰对自旋交叉现象的影响,我们合成了两个Fe(Ⅱ)自旋交叉的配合物[Fe(dpq)(py)₂(NCS)₂]·H₂O·py和[Fe(dpq)(py)₂(NCSe)₂]·1.5H₂O,(dpq=二吡嗪[2,3-f:2′3′-h]喹喔啉,py=吡啶)。通过对这两个配合物磁性质和穆斯堡尔谱的研究,发现和用邻啡咯啉配体合成的配合物比较,配体的修饰对自旋交叉性质以及其临界温度     

Potassium thiocyanate argentates: K3[Ag(SCN)4], K4[Ag2(SCN)6] and K[Ag(SCN)2]

The anions of the title compounds contain [Ag(SCN)₄] units, with the S atoms coordinating to Ag⁺ in a tetrahedral arrangement. Whereas in the isolated anions of tripotassium tetra­thio­cyanatoargentate(I), K₃[Ag(SCN)₄], (I), all SCN^? groups are bonded as terminal ligands, in tetrapotassium di‐μ‐thio­cyanato‐S:S‐bis­[dithio­cyanato­argentate(I)], K₄[Ag₂(SCN)₆], (II), two AgS₄ tetrahedra share one common edge. In poly[potassium [argentate(I)‐di‐μ‐thio­cyanato‐S:S]], K[Ag(SCN)₂], (III), edge‐ and vertex‐sharing of AgS₄ tetrahedra results in infinite [Ag(SCN)₂]^? layers.     

K4[Fe(CN)6]-K3[Fe(CN)6]体系催化分光光度法测定痕量汞

建立了一种测定痕量汞的催化分光光度新方法,它是基于汞能催化亚铁氰化钾分解生成Fe2 ,生成的Fe2 又与铁氰化钾反应生成兰色胶体溶液.方法的相对标准偏差≤5.3%,回收率为98.8%～104.8%之间,检出限为9.8×10-7 g/L;线性范围为0～0.050 μg/mL.     

Hyperfine interaction in K2Ba[Fe(NO2)6

Magnetic hyperfine splitting observed in the low temperature M?ssbauer spectrum of potassium barium hexanitro ferrate(II), in the absence of any external field, is attributed to the 5T2g state of the central metal atom further split into a ground 5Eg state and a first excited 5B2g state under a distorted octahedral symmetry in contrast to the earlier prediction of 1A1g ground state on the basis of room temperature M?ssbauer spectral and other properties. The central iron atom is coordinated to six nitrito groups (NO2-), having an oxidation state of +2. The temperature dependence of M?ssbauer spectra is explained on the basis of electronic relaxation among the spin-orbit coupled levels of the 5Eg ground state. Various kinds of electronic relaxation mechanisms have been compared to explain the proposed mechanism. The observed temperature dependent spectra with varying internal magnetic field and line width can be explained by simple spin lattice relaxation.     

Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [C(NMe2)3]2[(CO)4Fe(μ‐InCl2)2Fe(CO)4]

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [C(NMe₂)₃]₂[(CO)₄Fe(μ‐InCl₂)₂Fe(CO)₄] Treatment of [C(NMe₂)₃]₂[(CO)₄FeInCl₃] ( 1 ) with hot water produces the dinuclear complex [C(NMe₂)₃]₂[(CO)₄Fe(μ‐InCl₂)₂Fe(CO)₄] ( 2 ) which could be crystallized from dichloromethane/pentane. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with a = 835.7(1), b = 1187.8(1), c = 1902.7(1) pm, β = 91.877(5)° and Z = 2. The anion contains a four‐membered Fe—In—Fe—In ring with octahedral environment at the iron atom and tetrahedral coordination at the In atom.     

Hydrate isomerism in [Cu(en)2(H2O)1.935]2[Fe(CN)6]·4H2O

The title compound, bis[di­aqua­bis­(ethyl­enedi­amine‐κ²N,N′)copper(II)­] hexa­cyano­iron(II) tetrahydrate, [Cu(C₂H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)_1.935]₂[Fe(CN)₆]·4H₂O, was crystallized from an aqueous reaction mixture initially containing CuSO₄, K₃[Fe(CN)₆] and ethyl­enedi­amine (en) in a 3:2:6 molar ratio. Its structure is ionic and is built up of two crystallographically different cations, viz. [Cu(en)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ and [Cu(en)₂(H₂O)_1.87]²⁺, there being a deficiency of aqua ligands in the latter, [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ anions and disordered solvent water mol­ecules. All the metal atoms lie on centres of inversion. The Cu atom is octahedrally coordinated by two chelate‐bonded en mol­ecules [mean Cu—N = 2.016 (2) Å] in the equatorial plane, and by axial aqua ligands, showing very long distances due to the Jahn–Teller effect [mean Cu—O = 2.611 (2) Å]. In one of the cations, significant underoccupation of the O‐atom site is observed, correlated with the appearance of a non‐coordinated water mol­ecule. This is interpreted as the partial contribution of a hydrate isomer. The [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ anions form quite regular octahedra, with a mean Fe—C distance of 1.913 (2) Å. The dominant intermolecular interactions are cation–anion O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and these inter­actions form layers parallel to (001).     

应用Fe2+与K3[Fe(CN)6]反应测定还原性物质Vc

在pH 2～3的溶液中,低浓度Fe^2＋与K3[Fe（CN）6]反应产生的蓝色沉淀为近似真溶液,最大吸收波长为710 nm.形成的近似真溶液吸光度随静置时间变化而逐渐变大,30 min后吸光度变化缓慢.K3[Fe（CN）6]过量时,Fe^2＋浓度与吸光度呈很好的线性关系.Fe^2＋浓度较大时,易形成絮状沉淀.在pH 2～3的Fe^3＋-K3[Fe（CN）6]体系中,加入Vc能将Fe^3＋还原成Fe^2＋,进而与K3[Fe（CN）6]反应,30 min后测定蓝色拟真溶液的吸光度,Vc的量与溶液的吸光度同样有很好的线性关系,线性相关系数R〉0.999,检出限为0.94μg.