On the role of substituent in noncovalent functionalization of graphene and organophosphor recognition: IQA and SAPT perspective

Despite importance of integrating organic molecules with graphene to fabricate graphene‐based electronic devices, the role of substituents and interface stabilizing forces are poorly understood. In this work, the interactions of 7,7,8,8‐tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ), 2,3,5,6‐tetrafluoro‐7,7,8,8‐tetracyanoquinodimethane (F4TCNQ), hydroquinone (Q), and tetrafluorohydroquinone (TFQ) with graphene have been investigated by means of interacting quantum atoms and SAPT(DFT). In addition, in context of potential design of a graphene‐based sensor for detection of the nerve agent sarin, we studied the interaction of graphene and the organic molecules with the dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP)—the molecule that mimics sarin. The results show that the organic molecules attach to graphene via C(sp²)?C(sp²), C(sp²)?C(sp) and H?π bonds. In addition, they trap DMMP via various linkages such as hydrogen, lonepair?π and H?π . The quantum effects play a significant role. The Pauli repulsion is responsible for p‐doping of graphene. The substituents are stabilized on graphene by the exchange‐correlation energy. The fluorination of the benzenoid ring raises the electron‐sharing . The through space and through bond effects of the fluorine atoms (‐F) increase the classical attraction of the cyano groups and benzenoid ring with graphene, respectively. When comparing performance of the ab initio and DFT methods, MP2 predicts too much attraction due to well‐known overestimation of the dispersion energy by the uncoupled dispersion component for benzene rings, while ω B97xD functional and SAPT(DFT) provide weaker interaction energies, in good agreement with each other.