On some equations in prime rings

The main purpose of this paper is to prove the following result. Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from two and let T : R → R be an additive mapping satisfying the relation T(x ³) = T(x)x ² − xT(x)x + x ² T(x) for all x ∈ R. In this case T is of the form 4T(x) = qx + xq, where q is some fixed element from the symmetric Martindale ring of quotients. This result makes it possible to solve some functional equations in prime rings with involution which are related to bicircular projections.     

Some remarks on derivations in Banach algebras and related results

Summary In the first section of this paper we consider some functional equations which are closely connected to derivations (i.e. additive mappings with the propertyD(ab) = aD(b) + D(a)b) on Banach algebras. IfD is a derivation on some algebraA, then the equationD(a) = – aD(a ^–1 )a holds for all invertible elementsa A. It seems natural to ask whether this functional equation characterizes derivations among all additive mappings. It is too much to expect an affirmative answer to this question in arbitrary algebras, since it may happen that even in normed algebras the group of all invertible elements contains only scalar multiples of the identity. We try to answer the question above in Banach algebras, since in Banach algebras invertible elements exist in abundance. In the second section of the paper we prove some results concerning representability of quadratic forms by bilinear forms.     

Symmetric bi-derivations on prime and semi-prime rings

Summary LetR be a ring. A bi-additive symmetric mappingD(.,.): R × R R is called a symmetric bi-derivation if, for any fixedy R, a mappingx D(x, y) is a derivation. The purpose of this paper is to prove some results concerning symmetric bi-derivations on prime and semi-prime rings. We prove that the existence of a nonzero symmetric bi-derivationD(.,.): R × R R, whereR is a prime ring of characteristic not two, with the propertyD(x, x)x = xD(x, x), x R, forcesR to be commutative. A theorem in the spirit of a classical result first proved by E. Posner, which states that, ifR is a prime ring of characteristic not two andD ₁,D ₂ are nonzero derivations onR, then the mappingx D ₁(D ₂ (x)) cannot be a derivation, is also presented.     

Identities with Generalized Derivations in Prime Rings

In this paper we investigate identities with two generalized derivations in prime rings. We prove, for example, the following result. Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from two and let F ₁, F ₂ : R → R be generalized derivations satisfying the relation F ₁(x)F ₂(x) + F ₂(x)F ₁(x) = 0 for all ${x \in R}$ . In this case either F ₁ = 0 or F ₂ = 0.     

On some additive mappings in rings with involution

Summary LetR be a *-ring. We study an additive mappingD: R R satisfyingD(x ²) =D(x)x ^* +xD(x) for allx R.It is shown that, in caseR contains the unit element, the element 1/2, and an invertible skew-hermitian element which lies in the center ofR, then there exists ana R such thatD(x) = ax ^* – xa for allx R. IfR is a noncommutative prime real algebra, thenD is linear. In our main result we prove that a noncommutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2 is normal (i.e.xx ^* =x ^* x for allx R) if and only if there exists a nonzero additive mappingD: R R satisfyingD(x ²) =D(x)x ^* +xD(x) and [D(x), x] = 0 for allx R. This result is in the spirit of the well-known theorem of E. Posner, which states that the existence of a nonzero derivationD on a prime ringR, such that [D(x), x] lies in the center ofR for allx R, forcesR to be commutative.     

On certain functional equations related to Jordan triple (q, f){(\theta, \phi)}-derivations on semiprime rings

The main purpose of this paper is to prove the following result. Let R be a 2-torsion free semiprime ring with symmetric Martindale ring of quotients Q _s and let q{\theta} and f{\phi} be automorphisms of R. Suppose T:R? R{T:R\rightarrow R} is an additive mapping satisfying the relation T(xyx)=T(x)q(y)q(x)-f(x)T(y)q(x)+f(x)f(y)T(x){T(xyx)=T(x)\theta (y)\theta (x)-\phi (x)T(y)\theta (x)+\phi (x)\phi (y)T(x)}, for all pairs x,y ? R{x,y\in R}. In this case T is of the form 2T(x)=qq(x)+f(x)q{2T(x)=q\theta (x)+\phi (x)q}, for all x ? R{x\in R} and some fixed element q ? Q_s{q\in Q_{s}}.     

Some functional equations on standard operator algebras

The main purpose of this paper is to prove the following result. Let H be a complex Hilbert space, let (H) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators on H, and let (H) ⊂ (H) be a standard operator algebra which is closed under the adjoint operation. Suppose that T: (H) → (H) is a linear mapping satisfying T(AA* A) = T(A)A* A − AT(A*)A + AA*T(A) for all A ∈ (H). Then T is of the form T(A) = AB + BA for all A ∈ (H), where B is a fixed operator from (H). A result concerning functional equations related to bicircular projections is proved