System Maps for Retention of Small Neutral Compounds on a Superficially Porous Ethyl-Bridged,Octadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phase in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on an ethyl-bridged, ocatadecylsiloxane-bonded superficially porous silica stationary phase (Kinetex EVO C18) for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation-exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases with acetonitrile–water but not methanol–water mobile phase compositions. Compared with a superficially porous octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C18) with a similar morphology but different topology statistically significant differences in selectivity at the 95% confidence level are observed for neutral compounds that vary by size and hydrogen-bond basicity with other intermolecular interactions roughly similar. These selectivity differences are dampened with acetonitrile–water mobile phases, but are significant for methanol–water mobile phase compositions containing <30% (v/v) methanol. A comparison of a totally porous ethyl-bridged, octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (XBridge C18) with Kinetex EVO C18 indicated that they are effectively selectivity equivalent.     

Solid phase analytical derivatization of anthropogenic and natural phenolic estrogen mimics with pentafluoropyridine for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

A simple, low cost, fast and sensitive method is reported for the determination of the four endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) 4-tert-butylphenol, 4-tert-octylphenol, bisphenol A and 17β-estradiol using pentafluoropyridine as the derivatizing reagent. These EDCs were determined by simultaneous extraction and derivatization in a solid phase analytical derivatization (SPAD) technique without the aid of any phase transfer catalyst (PTC) or an ion-pair mechanism. Recoveries of analytes as their tetrafluoropyridyl derivatives from water ranged from 71% for 4-tert-butylphenol to 106% for 17β-estradiol; from urine they ranged from 61% for 17β-estradiol to 91% for 4-tert-octylphenol; and from humic acids solution the ranged from 59% for 17β-estradiol to 104% for 4-tert-octylphenol in humic acid solutions. Calibration curves were constructed from a matrix of human male urine in the range 1-40 ng/mL and had coefficients of correlation greater than 0.99. For 4-tert-butylphenol, bisphenol A and 17β-estradiol the limits of quantitation were 5 ng/mL and for 4-tert-octylphenol it was 1 ng/mL. This method was applied to determine EDCs and detected 4-tert-octylphenol, bisphenol A and 17β-estradiol in concentrations comparable to those found in the literature. The method offers advantages in speed of analysis, reduced reagent and specificity of derivatization.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism for Small Neutral Compounds on Silica-Based Phenyl Phases in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on phenylhexylsiloxane- and pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded superficially porous silica stationary phases (Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl and Kinetex F5) for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases for acetonitrile–water mobile phases, but virtually absent for the same compounds for methanol–water mobile phases. The selectivity of the Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl stationary phase for small neutral compounds is similar to an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase with similar morphology Kinetex C-18 for both methanol–water and acetonitrile–water mobile phase compositions. The Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl and XBridge Phenyl stationary phases with the same topology but different morphology are selectivity equivalent, confirming that solvation of the interphase region can be effective at dampening selectivity differences for modern stationary phases. Small selectivity differences observed for XTerra Phenyl (different morphology and topology) confirm previous reports that the length and type of space arm for phenylalkylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases can result in small changes in selectivity. The pentafluorophenylpropylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex F5) has similar separation properties to the phenylhexylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases, but is not selectivity equivalent. However, for method development purposes, the scope to vary separations from an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C-18) to “phenyl phase” of the types studied here is limited for small neutral compounds. In addition, selectivity differences for the above stationary phases are enhanced by methanol–water and largely suppressed by acetonitrile–water mobile phases. For bases, larger selectivity differences are possible for the above stationary phases if electrostatic interactions are exploited, especially for acetonitrile-containing mobile phases.     

Insights into the Retention Mechanism of Small Neutral Compounds on Octylsiloxane-Bonded and Diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-Bonded Silica Stationary Phases in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography

The system constants of the solvation parameter model are used to prepare system maps for the retention of small neutral compounds on an octylsiloxane-bonded (Kinetex C8) and diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded (Kinetex XB-C18) superficially porous silica stationary phases for aqueous mobile phases containing 10–70% (v/v) methanol or acetonitrile. Electrostatic interactions (cation-exchange) are important for the retention of weak bases with acetonitrile–water but not for methanol–water mobile phases. Compared with an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase (Kinetex C18) retention is reduced due to a less favorable phase ratio for both the octylsiloxane-bonded and diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases while selectivity differences are small and solvent dependent. Selectivity differences for neutral compounds are larger for methanol–water but significantly suppressed for acetonitrile–water mobile phases. The selectivity differences arise from small changes in all system constants with solute size and hydrogen-bond basicity being the most important due to their dominant contribution to the retention mechanism. Exchanging the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica column for either the octylsiloxane-bonded or diisobutyloctadecylsiloxane-bonded silica column affords little scope for extending the selectivity space and is restricted to fine tuning of separations, and in some cases, to obtain faster separations due to a more favorable phase ratio. For weak bases larger differences in relative retention are expected with acetonitrile–water mobile phases on account of the additional cation exchange interactions possible that are absent for the octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase.     

Comparison of the Separation Characteristics of the Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Stationary Phases XBridge C8 and Phenyl and XTerra Phenyl in RP-LC

Differences in the system constants of the solvation parameter model and retention factor correlation plots for varied solutes are used to study the retention mechanism on XBridge C₈, XBridge Phenyl and XTerra Phenyl stationary phases with acetonitrile–water and methanol–water mobile phases containing from 10 to 70% (v/v) organic solvent. These stationary phases are compared with XBridge C₁₈ and XBridge Shield RP₁₈ characterized in an earlier report using the same protocol. The XBridge stationary phases are all quite similar in their retention properties with larger difference in absolute retention explained by differences in cohesion and the phase ratio, mainly, and smaller changes in relative retention (selectivity) by the differences in individual system constants and their variation with mobile phase type and composition. None of the XBridge stationary phases are selectivity equivalent but XBridge C₁₈ and XBridge Shield RP₁₈ have similar separation properties, likewise so do XBridge C₈ and XBridge Phenyl, while the differences between the two groups of two stationary phases is greater than the difference within either group. The limited range of changes in selectivity is demonstrated by the high coefficient of determination (>0.98) for plots of the retention factors for varied compounds on the different XBridge phases with the same mobile phase composition.     

Retention properties of acetone-water mobile phases on a biphenylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

The solvation parameter model system constants and retention factors were used to interpret retention properties of 39 calibration compounds on a biphenylsiloxane-bonded stationary phase (Kinetex biphenyl) for acetone-water binary mobile phase systems containing 30–70% v/v. Variation in system constants, phase ratios, and retention factors of acetone-water binary mobile phases systems were compared with more commonly used acetonitrile and methanol mobile phase systems. Retention properties of acetone mobile phases on a Kinetex biphenyl column were more similar to that of acetonitrile than methanol mobile phases except with respect to selectivity equivalency. Importantly, selectivity differences arising between acetone and acetonitrile systems (the lower hydrogen-bond basicity of acetone-water mobile phases and differences in hydrogen-bond acidity, cavity formation and dispersion interactions) could be exploited in reversed-phase liquid chromatography method development on a Kinetex biphenyl stationary phase.