Successive stepwise evolution of host layer‐stacking framework upon the intercalation of mobile vapor guests within side‐chain layers

For the ordered phases of hairy‐rod semiconductive poly(2,5‐bis(3‐tetradecylthiophene‐2‐yl)thieno[3,2‐b]thiophene) (PBTTT) sandwiched in between crystalline platelets of hexamethylbenzene, the successive stepwise evolution of layer‐stacking framework upon guest intercalation has been studied in this research. The direct consequence of the guest intercalation into side‐chain layers is evaluated to cause the lateral shift of thiophene backbones along π–π stacking, resulting in stepwise shift of ultraviolet absorption wavelength. The thermal motions of vapor guests within disordering side‐chain layers subsequently cause progressive expansion of host stacking framework. With the increase in side‐chain length, thicker layers of disordering side chains in liquid crystals (LCs) accommodate additional vapor guests and larger amplitudes of thermal motions of guests, hence promoting the level of reversible d‐spacing change. The mixing between mobile vapor guests and aliphatic side chains is clarified as the mechanism of guest intercalation, which rationalizes successive guest intercalation during heating and the contribution of disordering side‐chain layers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2017 , 55, 1448–1456     

Effect of cucurbit[n]urils on tropicamide and potential application in ocular drug delivery

The supramolecular interactions of the ocular drug tropicamide (TR) with cucurbit[7]uril (CB7) and cucurbit[8]uril (CB8) were investigated in aqueous solutions by using ¹H NMR, ESI-MS and UV–vis spectroscopic techniques. The results indicate a 1:1 binding stoichiometry of TR with CB7 and CB8. The binding constants of TR in its protonated form were higher (e.g. K = 4 × 10⁶ M^? 1 with CB8) than in its neutral form (e.g. K = 1.4 × 10⁴ M^? 1 with CB8), which led to a complexation-induced increase in its pK _a value of ca. 0.5 and 2 units with CB7 and CB8, respectively. In the presence of about 1% (w/v) CB8, the ionisation degree of 0.1% (w/v) TR was increased from 2% to 62% at neutral pH. The increase in the pK _a value and thus stabilisation of the protonated TR species at neutral pH is discussed in the context of supramolecular drug delivery of ophthalmologic drugs.     

Ethylene spacer-linked bis-acetamidopyridine for dicarboxylic acid recognition and polymeric new wave-like anti-perpendicular arrangement of a host–guest in the solid state

In this paper, 1,2-bis(2-acetamido-6-pyridyl)ethane, receptor 1, having an ethylene spacer is reported to recognise dicarboxylic acids. The binding study in the solution phase is carried out using ¹H NMR (1:1) and UV–vis experiments and in the solid phase by single-crystal X-ray analysis. In ¹H NMR, the downfield shifts of specific amide protons of receptor 1 in 1:1 complexes of receptor and guest diacids, and in the UV–vis experiment, the appearance of an isosbestic point as well as significant binding constants are observed, which thus unambiguously support the complexation of receptor 1 with dicarboxylic acids in solution. Receptor 2, simple 2-acetamido-6-methylpyridine, has lower binding constants than receptor 1 due to cooperative binding of two pyridine amide groups with two acid groups of diacids. In the solid phase, the ditopic receptor 1 shows a grid-like polymeric hydrogen-bonded network that changes to a polymeric wave-like 1:1 anti-perpendicular network instead of the syn–syn polymeric 1:1 (Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005 (a) Goswami, S., Ghosh, K. and Dasgupta, S. 2000. J. Org. Chem., 65: 1907–1914. (b) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Mukherjee, R. Tetrahedron2001, 57, 4987–4993. (c) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Halder, M. Tetrahedron Lett.1999, 40, 1735–1738. (d) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett.2005, 46, 7187–7191. (e) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem.2006, 18, 571–574. (f) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm.2008, 10, 507–517. (g) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron2008,64, 6426–6433. (h) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Jana, S. Tetrahedron2008, 64, 6358–6363 [Google Scholar], 46, 7187–7191), anti–anti polymeric 1:1 (Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem. 2006 (a) Goswami, S., Ghosh, K. and Dasgupta, S. 2000. J. Org. Chem., 65: 1907–1914. (b) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Mukherjee, R. Tetrahedron2001, 57, 4987–4993. (c) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Halder, M. Tetrahedron Lett.1999, 40, 1735–1738. (d) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett.2005, 46, 7187–7191. (e) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem.2006, 18, 571–574. (f) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm.2008, 10, 507–517. (g) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron2008,64, 6426–6433. (h) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Jana, S. Tetrahedron2008, 64, 6358–6363 [Google Scholar], 18, 571–574; Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2008, 10, 507–517; Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 6426–6433), syn–syn 2:2 (Karle, I.L.; Ranganathan, D.; Haridas, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997 (a) Garcia-Tellado, F., Goswami, S., Chang, S.K., Geib, S.J. and Hamilton, A.D. 1990. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112: 7393–7394. (b) Geib, S.J.; Vicent, C.; Fan, E.; Hamilton, A.D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.1993, 32, 119–121. (c) Garcia-Tellado, F.; Geib, S.J.; Goswami, S.; Hamilton, A.D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1991, 113, 9265–9269. (d) Karle, I.L.; Ranganathan, D.; Haridas, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1997, 119, 2777–2783. (e) Moore, G.; Papamicaël, C.; Levacher, V.; Bourguignon, J.; Dupas, G. Tetrahedron2004, 60, 4197–4204. (f) Korendovych, I.V.; Cho, M.; Makhlynets, O.V.; Butler, P.L.; Staples, R.J.; Rybak-Akimova, E.V. J. Org. Chem.2008, 73, 4771–4782. (g) Ghosh, K.; Masanta, G.; Fröhlich, R.; Petsalakis, I.D.; Theodorakopoulos, G. J. Phys. Chem. B2009, 113, 7800–7809 [Google Scholar], 119, 2777–2783) or top–bottom-bound 1:1 (Garcia-Tellado, F.; Goswami, S.; Chang, S.K.; Geib, S.J.; Hamilton, A.D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990 (a) Goswami, S., Ghosh, K. and Dasgupta, S. 2000. J. Org. Chem., 65: 1907–1914. (b) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Mukherjee, R. Tetrahedron2001, 57, 4987–4993. (c) Goswami, S.; Ghosh, K.; Halder, M. Tetrahedron Lett.1999, 40, 1735–1738. (d) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Fun, H.-K.; Anjum, S.; Rahman, A.-U. Tetrahedron Lett.2005, 46, 7187–7191. (e) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Razak, I.A.; Fun, H.-K. Supramol. Chem.2006, 18, 571–574. (f) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Fun, H.-K. Cryst. Eng. Comm.2008, 10, 507–517. (g) Goswami, S.; Jana, S.; Dey, S.; Sen, D.; Fun, H.-K.; Chantrapromma, S. Tetrahedron2008,64, 6426–6433. (h) Goswami, S.; Dey, S.; Jana, S. Tetrahedron2008, 64, 6358–6363 [Google Scholar], 112, 7393–7394) co-crystals.

     

Dimerisation and complexation of 6-(4′-t-butylphenylamino)naphthalene-2-sulphonate by β-cyclodextrin and linked β-cyclodextrin dimers

This study shows that stereochemical factors largely determine the extent to which 6-(4′-t-butylphenylamino)-naphthalene-2-sulphonate, BNS^?  and its dimer, (BNS^? )₂, are complexed by β-cyclodextrin, βCD, and a range of linked βCD dimers. Fluorescence and ¹H NMR studies, respectively, show that BNS^?  and (BNS^? )₂ form host–guest complexes with βCD of the stoichiometry βCD.BNS^?  (10^? 4 K ₁ = 4.67 dm³ mol^? 1) and βCD.BNS₂ ^2 ?  (10^? 2 K ₂′ = 2.31 dm³ mol^? 1), where the complexation constant K ₁ = [βCD.BNS^? ]/([βCD][BNS^? ]) and K ₂′ = [βCD. (BNS^? )₂]/([βCD.BNS^? ][BNS^? ]) in aqueous phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, I = 0.10 mol dm³ at 298.2 K. (The dimerisation of BNS^?  is characterised by 10^? 2 K _d = 2.65 dm³ mol^? 1.) For N,N-bis((2^AS,3^AS)-3^A-deoxy-3^A-β-cyclodextrin)succinamide, 33βCD₂su, N-((2^AS,3^AS)-3^A-deoxy-3^A-β-cyclodextrin)-N′-(6^A-deoxy-6^A-β-cyclodextrin)urea, 36βCD₂su, N,N-bis(6^A-deoxy-6^A-β-cyclodextrin)succinamide, 66βCD₂su, N-((2^AS,3^AS)-3^A-deoxy-3^A-β-cyclodextrin)-N′-(6^A-deoxy-6^A-β-cyclodextrin)urea, 36βCD₂ur, and N,N-bis(6^A-deoxy-6^A-β-cyclodextrin)urea, 66βCD₂ur, the analogous 10^? 4 K ₁ = 11.0, 101, 330, 29.6 and 435 dm³ mol^? 1 and 10^? 2 K ₂′ = 2.56, 2.31, 2.59, 1.82 and 1.72 dm³ mol^? 1, respectively. A similar variation occurs in K ₁ derived by UV–vis methods. The factors causing the variations in K ₁ and K ₂ are discussed in conjunction with ¹H ROESY NMR and molecular modelling studies.     

Cup-shaped E,E-stilbenophane: synthesis,crystal structure and supramolecular chemistry

A new E,E-stilbenophane was synthesised and characterised. The crystal structure of this cyclophane shows that this molecule has a cup-shaped structure, which hosts a phenyl ring of neighbouring molecule as guest in its cavity with a π–π distance of about 3.7 Å. Moreover, the NMR spectra and theoretical analysis (gauge-independent atomic orbitals (GIAO) and quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM)) suggest that the silver recognition by E,E-stilbenophane host molecules is based on cation–π interactions in which the π-electrons of the double bonds play a major role.     

Interaction between tetramethylcucurbit[6]uril with α-furaldehyde-isonicotinyl-hydrazone hydrochloride

Interaction between tetramethylcucurbit[6]uril (TMeQ[6], host) and the hydrochloride salt of α-furaldehyde-isonicotinyl-hydrazone hydrochloride (FIHH⁺, guest) was investigated using X-ray crystallography and spectroscopic methods. X-ray crystallography showed that the π–π stacking effect and hydrogen bonding resulted in the formation of a dumbbell-shaped supramolecule which contained two FIHH⁺@TMeQ[6] host–guest inclusion complexes. The host–guest interaction provided identifiable changes in the vibrational frequencies in the IR spectra. ¹H NMR spectral analysis established a similar interaction model and revealed that TMeQ[6] preferred to include the furan moiety over the pyridine moiety of the FIHH⁺ guest molecule. Absorption spectrophotometric analysis suggested that the host and guest interact in a ratio of 1:1 with a stability constant K _s = (3.52 ± 0.74) × 10⁶ l mol^? 1.pH titration confirmed that the host–guest interaction led to a clear change in the protonation constant of the title guest. Quantum chemical calculations were used to determine the possible mechanism of formation of the dumbbell-shaped complex.