Synthesis and structures of cycloalkylidene‐bridged mixed cyclopentadienyl‐indenyl tetracarbonyl diruthenium complexes

A series of cycloalkylidene‐bridged mixed cyclopentadienyl‐indenyl tetracarbonyl diruthenium complexes (η⁵:η⁵‐RC₅H₃CR′₂C₉H₆)Ru₂(CO)₂(µ‐CO)₂ [R = H, R′, R′ = Me₂ (1), (CH₂)₄ (2), (CH₂)₅ (3), (CH₂)₆ (4); R = ^tBu, R′, R′ = Me₂ (5), (CH₂)₄ (6), (CH₂)₅ (7)] have been synthesized by reactions of the corresponding ligands RC₅H₄CR′₂C₉H₇ with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in refluxing xylene. The molecular structures of 2, 6 and 7 have been determined by X‐ray diffraction. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Crystal Structures of Diruthenium Complexes Containing Bridging Salicylato Ligands

The thermal reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ ( 1 ) with salicylic acid, in the presence of triphenylphosphine, pyridine, or dimethylsulfoxide, afforded the dinuclear complexes Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐O₂CC₆H₄OH)₂L₂ ( 2 ) [L = PPh₃ ( 2a ). C₅H₅N ( 2b ); (CH₃)₂SO ( 2c )]. Complex 2b was further reacted with the aromatic dimmines 2,2′‐dipyridine or 1,10‐phenanthroline to give the cationic diruthenium complexes [Ru₂(CO)₂(μ‐CO)₂(μ‐O₂CC₆H₄OH)(N∩N)₂]⁺ ( 3 ) [(N∩N) = 2,2′‐dipyridine ( 3a ); 1,10‐phenanthroline ( 3b )], which were isolated as their tetraphenylborate salts. All five novel complexes were characterized spectroscopically and analytically. For 2a – 2b and 3a – 3b , single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies were also carried out.     

Synthesis reactivity and electrochemical properties of substituted cyclopentadienyl cobalt (III) complexes

Cyclopentadienyl cobalt complexes (η⁵‐C₅H₄R) CoLI₂ [L = CO,R=‐COOCH₂CH=CH₂ (3); L=PPh₃, R=‐COOCH₂‐CH=CH₂ (6); L=P(p‐C₆H₄O₃)₃, R = ‐COOC(CH₃) = CH₂ (7), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅ (8), ‐COOCH₂CH = CH₂ (9)] were prepared and characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H NMR, ER and UV‐vis spectra. The reaction of complexes (η⁵‐C₅H₄R)CoLI₂ [L= CO, R= ‐COOC(CH₃) = CH₂ (1), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅(2); L=PPh₃, R=‐COOC (CH₃) = CH₂ (4), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅ (5)] with Na‐Hg resulted in the formation of their corresponding substituted cobaltocene (η⁵‐C₅H₄R)₂ Co[R=‐COOC(CH₃) = CH₂ (10), ‐COOCH₂C₆H₅ (11)]. The electrochemical properties of these complexes 1–11 were studied by cyclic voltammetry. It was found that as the ligand (L) of the cobalt (III) complexes changing from CO to PPh₃ and P(p‐tolyl)₃, their oxidation potentials increased gradually. The cyclic voltammetry of α,α′‐substituted cobaltocene showed reversible oxidation of one electron process.     

Ru2(CO)4{OOC(CH2)nCH3}2L2 sawhorse-type complexes containing μ2-η2-carboxylato ligands derived from saturated fatty acids

The thermal reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with the saturated fatty acids (heptanoic, nonanoic, decanoic, tridecanoic, tetradecanoic, heptadecanoic, octadecanoic) in refluxing tetrahydrofuran, followed by addition of triphenylphosphine (PPh₃) or pyridine (C₅H₅N), gives the dinuclear complexes Ru₂(CO)₄{OOC(CH₂) _n CH₃}₂L₂ (1: n = 5, 2: n = 7, 3: n = 8, 4: n = 11, 5: n = 12, 6: n = 15, 7: n = 16; a: L = NC₅H₅, b: L = PPh₃). The single crystal structure analysis of 1b, 2a, 3a, 4a and 5a reveals a dinuclear Ru₂(CO)₄ sawhorse structure, the diruthenium backbone being bridged by the carboxylato ligands, while the two L ligands occupy the axial positions at the ruthenium atoms. In 2a, π-π stacking interactions between adjacent pyridyl units of symmetry related molecules prevail, while in the longer alkyl chain derivatives 3a, 4a and 5a, additional van der Waals and electrostatic interactions between the alkyl chains take place as well in the packing arrangement of the molecules, thus giving rise to layers of parallel alkyl chains in the crystal.     

Hydroboration of Alkynes with Zwitterionic Ruthenium–Borate Complexes: Novel Vinylborane Complexes

Building upon previous studies on the synthesis of bis(sigma)borate and agostic complexes of ruthenium, the chemistry of nido‐[(Cp*Ru)₂B₃H₉] ( 1 ) with other ligand systems was explored. In this regard, mild thermolysis of nido‐ 1 with 2‐mercaptobenzothiazole (2‐mbzt), 2‐mercaptobenzoxazole (2‐mbzo) and 2‐mercaptobenzimidazole (2‐mbzi) ligands were performed which led to the isolation of bis(sigma)borate complexes [Cp*RuBH₃L] ( 2 a – c ) and β‐agostic complexes [Cp*RuBH₂L₂] ( 3 a – c ; 2 a , 3 a : L=C₇H₄NS₂; 2 b , 3 b : L=C₇H₄NSO; 2 c , 3 c : L=C₇H₅N₂S). Further, the chemistry of these novel complexes towards various diphosphine ligands was investigated. Room temperature treatment of 3 a with [PPh₂(CH₂)_nPPh₂] (n=1–3) yielded [Cp*Ru(PPh₂(CH₂)_nPPh₂)‐BH₂(L₂)] ( 4 a – c ; 4 a : n=1; 4 b : n=2; 4 c : n=3; L=C₇H₄NS₂). Mild thermolysis of 2 a with [PPh₂(CH₂)_nPPh₂] (n=1–3) led to the isolation of [Cp*Ru(PPh₂(CH₂)_nPPh₂)(L)] (L=C₇H₄NS₂ 5 a – c ; 5 a : n=1; 5 b : n=2; 5 c : n=3). Treatment of 4 a with terminal alkynes causes a hydroboration reaction to generate vinylborane complexes [Cp*Ru(R?C?CH₂)BH(L₂)] ( 6 and 7 ; 6 : R=Ph; 7 : R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂). Complexes 6 and 7 can also be viewed as η‐alkene complexes of ruthenium that feature a dative bond to the ruthenium centre from the vinylinic double bond. In addition, DFT computations were performed to shed light on the bonding and electronic structures of the new compounds.     

Tetra(3‐methoxypropionato)diruthenium(II,III) Units: Supramolecular Organization in the Complex [Ru2(μ‐O2CCH2CH2OMe)4(H2O)2]BF4

The synthesis and characterization of Ru₂Cl(μ‐O₂CCH₂CH₂OMe)₄ ( 1 ), [Ru₂(μ‐O₂CCH₂CH₂OMe)₄(H₂O)₂]BF₄ ( 2 ), PPh₄[Ru₂Cl₂(μ‐O₂CCH₂CH₂OMe)₄] ( 3 ), (PPh₄)₂[Ru₂Br₂(μ‐O₂CCH₂CH₂OMe)₄]NO₃ ( 4 ), and (PPh₄)₂[Ru₂I₂(μ‐O₂CCH₂CH₂OMe)₄]I_0.5(NO₃)_0.5 ( 5 ), are described. The structure of complexes 2 – 5 was established by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. All complexes show a diruthenium(II, III) unit bridged by four 3‐methoxypropionate ligands. The cationic complex 2 have two axially coordinated water molecules, with a Ru–Ru bond distance of 2.2681(12) Å. This complex shows a supramolecular two‐dimensional organization across hydrogen bonded between the axial water molecules and two methoxy groups of adjacent diruthenium units. The metal‐metal bond lengths, in the anionic complexes 3 , 4 , and 5 , are 2.3039(5), 2.3077(6), and 2.3115(8) Å, respectively. These distances are longer than the observed in compound 2 . In the anionic complexes, the axial positions of the diruthenium units are occupied by two halide ligands. Complexes 3 – 5 have PPh₄⁺ cations as counterion, although 4 and 5 are double salts with PPh₄NO₃ and PPh₄I_0.5(NO₃)_0.5, respectively. All compounds have been also characterized by elemental analysis, magnetic measurements, and spectroscopic techniques.     

Catalytic and anticancer activities of sawhorse-type diruthenium tetracarbonyl complexes derived from fluorinated fatty acids

The reaction of fluorinated fatty acids, perfluorobutyric acid (C₃F₇CO₂H), and perfluorododecanoic acid (C₁₁F₂₃CO₂H), with dodecacarbonyltriruthenium (Ru₃(CO)₁₂) under reflux in tetrahydrofuran, followed by addition of two-electron donors (L) such as pyridine, 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphatricyclo[3.3.1.1]decane, or triphenylphosphine, gives stable diruthenium complexes Ru₂(CO)₄(μ₂-η²-O₂CC₃F₇)₂(L)₂ (1a, L?=?C₅H₅N; 1b, L?=?PTA; 1c, L?=?PPh₃) and Ru₂(CO)₄(μ₂-η²-O₂CC₁₁F₂₃)₂(L)₂ (2a, L?=?C₅H₅N; 2b, L?=?PTA; 2c, L?=?PPh₃). The catalytic activity of the complexes for hydrogenation of styrene under supercritical carbon dioxide has been assessed and compared to the analogous triphenylphosphine complexes with non-fluorinated carboxylato groups Ru₂(CO)₄(μ₂-η²-O₂CC₃H₇)₂(PPh₃)₂ (3) and Ru₂(CO)₄(μ₂-η²-O₂CC₁₁H₂₃)₂(PPh₃)₂ (4). In addition, the cytotoxicities of the fluorinated complexes 1 were also evaluated on several human cancer cell lines (A2780, A549, Me300, HeLa). The complexes appear to be moderately cytotoxic, showing greater activity on the Me300 melanoma cells. Single-crystal X-ray structure analyses of 1a and 3 show the typical sawhorse-type arrangement of the diruthenium tetracarbonyl backbone with two bridging carboxylates and two terminal ligands occupying the axial positions.     

Synthesis and characterization of some novel triphenylarsenic(V) derivatives of monofunctional bidentate 2,2‐disubstituted benzothiazoline ligands

A series of triphenylarsenic(V) derivatives Ph₃As(OPrⁱ)[SC₆H₄N:C(R)CH₂C(O)R′] have been synthesized by the reactions of triphenylarsenic(V)‐ isoproproxide, Ph₃As(OPrⁱ)₂ with the corresponding 2,2‐disubstituted benzothiazolines of the type (where R = CH₃, R′ = CH₃( 1 ); R = CH₃, R′ = C₆H₅( 2 ); R = CH₃, R′ = 4‐CH₃C₆H₄( 3 ); R = CH₃, R′ = 4‐ClC₆H₄( 4 ); and R = CF₃, R′ = C₆H₅( 5 )) in equimolar ratio in refluxing benzene solution. Molecular weight measurements of these complexes show their monomeric nature in solution. Characterization of these compounds using elemental analyses, molecular weight measurements, and spectral studies (IR as well as NMR (¹H and ¹³C)) shows the monofunctional bidentate nature of the ligands and a hexacoordination around the central arsenic atom in these organoarsenic(V) derivatives. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 18:76–80, 2007; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/hc.20233     

Synthesis,Characterization, and X‐ray Structures of Ru3(CO)9(dotpm)(L) Complexes [L = PPh3, P(C6H4Cl‐p)3, and PPh2(C6H4Br‐p)]

The reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₀(dotpm) ( 1 ) [dotpm = (bis(di‐ortho‐tolylphosphanyl)methane)] and one equivalent of L [L = PPh₃, P(C₆H₄Cl‐p)₃ and PPh₂(C₆H₄Br‐p)] in refluxing n‐hexane afforded a series of derivatives [Ru₃(CO)₉(dotpm)L] ( 2 – 4 ), respectively, in ca. 67–70 % yield. Complexes 2 – 4 were characterized by elemental analysis (CHN), IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy. The molecular structures of 2 , 3 , and 4 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The bidentate dotpm and monodentate phosphine ligands occupy equatorial positions with respect to the Ru triangle. The effect of substitution resulted in significant differences in the Ru–Ru and Ru–P bond lengths.     

Mono‐ and heterodi‐nuclear complexes of aluminium: synthesis,characterization and antifungal activity

Some new types of mononuclear derivatives, AlL(1–4)L(1–4)H ( 1a–1d ) of aluminium were synthesized by the reaction of Al(OPrⁱ)₃ and LH₂ [XC(NYOH)CHC(R)OH], X = CH₃, Y = (CH₂)₂, R = CH₃(L1H₂); X = C₆H₅, Y = (CH₂)₂, R = CH₃(L2H₂); X = CH₃, Y = (CH₂)₃, R = CH₃(L3H₂); X = C₆H₅, Y = (CH₂)₃, R = CH₃(L4H₂) in 1:2 molar ratio in refluxing benzene. Reactions of AlL(1–4)L(1–4)H with hexamethyldisilazane in 2:1 molar ratio yielded some new ligand bridged heterodinuclear derivatives AlL(1–4)L(1–4)SiMe₃ ( 2a – 2d ). All these newly synthesized derivatives were characterized by elemental analysis and molecular weight measurements. Tentative structures were proposed on the basis of IR and NMR spectra (¹H, ¹³C, 27 Al and ²⁹Si) and FAB‐mass studies. Schiff base ligands and their mono‐ and heterodi‐nuclear derivatives with aluminium have been screened for fungicidal activities. These compounds showed significant antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger and A. flavus. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis of a series of new ruthenium organometallic complexes derived from pyridine‐imine ligands and their catalytic activity in oxidation of secondary alcohols

Reactions of pyridine imines [C₅H₄N‐2‐C(H) = N‐C₆H₄‐R] [R = H (1), CH₃ (2), OMe (3), CF₃ (4), Cl (5), Br (6)] with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in refluxing toluene gave the corresponding dinuclear ruthenium carbonyl complexes of the type {μ‐η²‐CH[(2‐C₅H₄N)(N‐C₆H₄‐R)]}₂Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CO) [R = H (7); CH₃ (8); OMe (9); CF₃ (10); Cl (11); Br (12)]. All six novel complexes were separated by chromatography, and fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR, NMR spectroscopy. Molecular structures of 7, 10, 11, and 12 were determined by X‐ray crystal diffraction. Further, the catalytic performance of these complexes was also tested. The combination of {μ‐η²‐CH[(2‐C₅H₄N)(N‐C₆H₄‐R)]}₂Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CO) and NMO afforded an efficient catalytic system for the oxidation of a variety secondary alcohols.     

Demercuriation reactions of the complexes [(PPh3)2RPtHgR′] containing platinum-mercury bonds

The compounds [(PPh₃)₂,RPtHgR′] (R = CH₃, R′= 2,5-C₆H₃Cl₂, 2,3,4- and 2,4,6-C₆H₂Cl₃, 2,3,4,5-, 2,3,4,6- and 2,3,5,6-C₆HCl₄, C₆Cl₅; R = Et, R′ = 2,5-C₆H₃Cl₂, 2,4,6-C₆H₂Cl₃; R = 2-C₆H₄Cl, R′=2-C₆H₄(CH₃)) have been prepared by the reactions of RHgR′ with Pt(PPh₃)₃, in order to study their possible use as intermediates in the preparation of diorganoplatinum complexes with different organic ligands. The dependence of J(³¹P-¹⁹⁵Pt) on slight differences in the electronic character of the ligand R′ in the series of compounds [(PPh₃)₂(CH₃)Pt-HgR′] has been studied.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of acetatobis(triphenylphosphine)dicarbonylrhenium(I). new car☐ylato derivatives of rhenium(I)

Acetatobis(triphenylphosphine)dicarbonylrhenium (I), (PPh₃)₂(CO)₂Re(O₂CCH₃), has been prepared in a novel way by treating (PPh₃)₂(CO)₂Re(NHCOR) (R = C₆H₅, p-MeC₆H₄) with triethylamine and water in the presence of air. Oxidation of the ethyl group of the tertiary amine is presumably involved in the formation of the acetate ligand. Three-dimensional single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis shows that the complex is octahedral with the phosphines in trans positions and the acetate ion acting as a chelating ligand. The complex crystallizes in theP2₁/c space group with cell dimensions a = 17.63(2), b = 9.72(1), c = 20.95(2)Å, β = 104°38'(6'), Z = 4. The mean values of bond lengths observed are Re-P 2.415, Re-O 2.21 and Re-(CO) 1.85Å. The same acetate derivative and a series of car?ylato complexes (PPh₃)₂(CO)₂Re(O₂CR') have been obtained from reactions of Re(CO)₂(PPh₃)₃H with car?ylic acids R'COOH (R' = H, CH₃, CH₂Cl, CH₂CH₃, C₆H₅). When trifluoroacetic acid is used, a product of formula (PPh₃)₂(CO)₃Re(OC(O)CF₃) is isolated. The action of neutral ligands L on some of these products gave rise to derivatives of formula (PPh₃)₂(CO)₂(L)Re(OC(O)R') (L = CO, R' = H, CH₃, C₆H₅; L = pMeC₆H₄NC, R' = CH₃), having monodentate car?ylato moieties.     

Mapping the Transformation [{RuII(CO)3Cl2}2]→[RuI2(CO)4]2+: Implications in Binuclear Water–Gas Shift Chemistry

The complete sequence of reactions in the base‐promoted reduction of [{Ru^II(CO)₃Cl₂}₂] to [Ru^I₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been unraveled. Several μ‐OH, μ:κ²‐CO₂H‐bridged diruthenium(II) complexes have been synthesized; they are the direct results of the nucleophilic activation of metal‐coordinated carbonyls by hydroxides. The isolated compounds are [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐OH)(NP^F‐Am)₂][PF₆] ( 1 ; NP^F‐Am=2‐amino‐5,7‐trifluoromethyl‐1,8‐naphthyridine) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)(μ‐OH)(NP‐Me₂)₂][BF₄]₂ ( 2 ), secured by the applications of naphthyridine derivatives. In the absence of any capping ligand, a tetranuclear complex [Ru₄(CO)₈(H₂O)₂(μ³‐OH)₂(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₄][CF₃SO₃]₂ ( 3 ) is isolated. The bridging hydroxido ligand in 1 is readily replaced by a π‐donor chlorido ligand, which results in [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ:κ²‐C,O‐CO₂H)₂(μ‐Cl)(NP‐PhOMe)₂][BF₄] ( 4 ). The production of [Ru₂(CO)₄]²⁺ has been attributed to the thermally induced decarboxylation of a bis(hydroxycarbonyl)–diruthenium(II) complex to a dihydrido–diruthenium(II) species, followed by dinuclear reductive elimination of molecular hydrogen with the concomitant formation of the Ru^I? Ru^I single bond. This work was originally instituted to find a reliable synthetic protocol for the [Ru₂(CO)₄(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ precursor. It is herein prescribed that at least four equivalents of base, complete removal of chlorido ligands by Tl^I salts, and heating at reflux in acetonitrile for a period of four hours are the conditions for the optimal conversion. Premature quenching of the reaction resulted in the isolation of a trinuclear Ru^I₂Ru^II complex [{Ru(NP‐Am)₂(CO)}{Ru₂(NP‐Am)₂(CO)₂(μ‐CO)₂}(μ₃:κ³‐C,O,O′‐CO₂)][BF₄]₂ ( 6 ). These unprecedented diruthenium compounds are the dinuclear congeners of the water–gas shift (WGS) intermediates. The possibility of a dinuclear pathway eliminates the inherent contradiction of pH demands in the WGS catalytic cycle in an alkaline medium. A cooperative binuclear elimination could be a viable route for hydrogen production in WGS chemistry.     

A paramagnetic precursor for polymeric supramolecular assemblies based on multiply bonded dimetal units: μ‐acetato‐aceto­nitrile­tris(μ‐N,N′‐di­phenyl­formamidinato)­di­ruthenium tetra­fluoro­borate di­chloro­methane hemisolvate

The title compound, [Ru₂(C₁₃H₁₁N₂)₃(C₂H₃O₂)(C₂H₃N)]BF₄·0.5CH₂Cl₂ or [Ru₂(μ‐DPhF)₃(μ‐O₂CMe)(MeCN)]BF₄·0.5CH₂Cl₂, where DPhF is N,N′‐diphenyl­formamidinate, crystallized as dark‐blue block‐shaped crystals. In the unit cell, the diruthenium cation lies on a general position, and the BF₄⁻ anions reside on two independent special positions with crystallographic twofold symmetry. Disorder was observed for one of the phenyl groups in the formamidinate ligand, the axial aceto­nitrile mol­ecule and the interstitial di­chloro­methane mol­ecule. The compound, which exhibits a long Ru—Ru bond of 2.4131 (5) Å, is the first {Ru₂}⁵⁺ formamidin­ate species that is both equatorially and axially functionalized so that it can be used as a precursor for polymeric paramagnetic supramolecular assemblies.     

η4‐HBCC‐σ,π‐Borataallyl Complexes of Ruthenium Comprising an Agostic Interaction

Thermolysis of [Cp*Ru(PPh₂(CH₂)PPh₂)BH₂(L₂)] 1 (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅; L=C₇H₄NS₂), with terminal alkynes led to the formation of η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)B{R‐C=CH₂}(L)₂] ( 2 a – c ) and η²‐vinylborane complexes [Cp*Ru(R‐C=CH₂)BH(L)₂] ( 3 a – c ) ( 2 a , 3 a : R=Ph; 2 b , 3 b : R=COOCH₃; 2 c , 3 c : R=p‐CH₃‐C₆H₄; L=C₇H₄NS₂) through hydroboration reaction. Ruthenium and the HBCC unit of the vinylborane moiety in 2 a – c are linked by a unique η⁴‐interaction. Conversions of 1 into 3 a – c proceed through the formation of intermediates 2 a – c . Furthermore, in an attempt to expand the library of these novel complexes, chemistry of σ‐borane complex [Cp*RuCO(μ‐H)BH₂L] 4 (L=C₇H₄NS₂) was investigated with both internal and terminal alkynes. Interestingly, under photolytic conditions, 4 reacts with methyl propiolate to generate the η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH₂}(L)] 5 and [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{HC=CH‐R}(L)] 6 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂) by Markovnikov and anti‐Markovnikov hydroboration. In an extension, photolysis of 4 in the presence of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate yielded η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complex [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH‐R}(L)] 7 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂). An agostic interaction was also found to be present in 2 a – c and 5 – 7 , which is rare among the borataallyl complexes. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 b , 3 a – c and 5 – 7 . DFT calculations were performed to evaluate possible bonding and electronic structures of the new compounds.     

Synthesis and structures of fulvene-bridged diruthenium complexes

Three diruthenium carbonyl complexes, namely (η ³:η ⁵-C₅H₄C(CH₂)₂)Ru₂(CO)₅ (1), (η ³:η ⁵-C₅H₄C(CHCH₂)(C₂H₅))Ru₂(CO)₅ (2), and (η ¹:η ⁵-C₅H₄C₅H₈)Ru₂(CO)₆ (3), were obtained from the reactions of C₅H₄C(Me)₂, C₅H₄C(Et)₂, and C₅H₄C(CH₂)₄, respectively, with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in refluxing xylene. The complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and ¹H NMR spectra. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis for complexes 1 and 2 revealed that the fulvene ligands bridge two ruthenium atoms in η ³:η ⁵ fashion.     

The Reactions of Two New Alkoxy-silyl Functionalized Alkynes with M<Subscript>3</Subscript>(CO)<Subscript>12</Subscript> {M = Fe,Ru} and Co<Subscript>2</Subscript>(CO)<Subscript>8</Subscript>. Spectroscopic Identification of the Products

The new alkoxysilyl-functionalized alkynes [HC≡CCH₂N(H)C(=O)N(H)(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃] and [HC≡C(C₆H₄)–N(H)C(=O)N(H)(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃] have been synthesized using literature methods. These have been reacted with Fe₃(CO)₁₂, Ru₃(CO)₁₂ and Co₂(CO)₈. With the iron carbonyl only decomposition was observed: with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ splitting of the alkynes into their parent components and formation of the complexes (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₉[HC=N(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃], (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₉[C–C(C₆H₄)NH₂] and (μ-H)₂Ru₃(CO)₉[HC–CCH₃] occurred. Finally, with Co₂(CO)₈ formation of complexes Co₂(CO)₆(HC₂R) R=(C₆H₄)NH₂, CH₂NH(CO)NH(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃, (C₆H₄)NH(CO)NH(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃ containing the intact alkynes could be obtained.     

Monophosphine‐substituted diiron azadithiolate complexes: New syntheses,characterization and electrochemical properties

Investigating the synthesis and properties of diiron azadithiolate complexes is one of the key topics for mimicking the active site of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases, which might be very useful for the design of new efficient catalysts for hydrogen production and the development of a future hydrogen economy. A series of new phosphine‐substituted diiron azadithiolate complexes as models for the active site of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases are described. A novel and efficient way was firstly established for the preparation of phosphine‐substituted diiron azadithiolate complexes. The reaction of Fe₂(μ‐SH)₂(CO)₆ and phosphine ligands L affords the intermediate Fe₂(μ‐SH)₂(CO)₅L ( A ). The intermediate reacts in situ with a premixed solution of paraformaldehyde and ammonium carbonate to produce the target phosphine‐substituted diiron azadithiolate complexes Fe₂[(μ‐SCH₂)₂NH](CO)₅L ( 1a – 1f ) (L = P(C₆H₄–4‐CH₃)₃, P(C₆H₄–3‐CH₃)₃, P(C₆H₄–4‐F)₃, P(C₆H₄–3‐F)₃, P(2‐C₄H₃O)₃, PPh₂(OCH₂CH₃)). Furthermore, reactions of the intermediate A with I‐4‐C₆H₄N(CH₂Cl)₂ in the presence of Et₃N give the phosphine‐substituted diiron azadithiolate complexes Fe₂[(μ‐SCH₂)₂NC₆H₄–4‐I](CO)₅L ( 2a – 2e ) (L = P(C₆H₄–4‐CH₃)₃, P(C₆H₄–3‐CH₃)₃, P(C₆H₄–4‐F)₃, P(C₆H₄–3‐F)₃, P(2‐C₄H₃O)₃). All the complexes were fully characterized using elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopies and, particularly for 1a , 1c – 1e , 2a and 2c , single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. In addition, complexes 1a – 1f and 2a – 2e were found to be catalysts for H₂ production under electrochemical conditions. Density functional theory calculations were performed for the reactions of Fe₂(μ‐SH)₂(CO)₆ + P(C₆H₄–4‐CH₃)₃.     

Ruthenium(II) Complexes Bearing Schiff Base Ligands for Efficient Acceptorless Dehydrogenation of Secondary Alcohols†

Four ruthenium(II) complexes 1—4 [RN=CH‐(2,4‐(^tBu)₂C₆H₂O)]RuH(PPh₃)₂(CO) (R = C₆H₅, 1; R = 4‐MeC₆H₄, 2; R = 4‐ClC₆H₄, 3; R = 4‐BrC₆H₄, 4) bearing Schiff base ligands were prepared by treating RuHClCO(PPh₃)₃ with RN=CH‐(2,4‐(^tBu)₂C₆H₂OH (L1—L4) in the presence of triethylamine. Their structures were fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR, NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography. These Ru(II) complexes exhibit high catalytic performance and good functional‐group compatibility in the acceptorless dehydrogenation of secondary alcohols, affording the corresponding ketones in 82%—94% yields.