The 9H‐9‐Borafluorene Dianion: A Surrogate for Elusive Diarylboryl Anion Nucleophiles

Double reduction of the THF adduct of 9H‐9‐borafluorene ( 1 ?THF) with excess alkali metal affords the dianion salts M₂[ 1 ] in essentially quantitative yields (M=Li–K). Even though the added charge is stabilized through π delocalization, [ 1 ]^2? acts as a formal boron nucleophile toward organoboron ( 1 ?THF) and tetrel halide electrophiles (MeCl, Et₃SiCl, Me₃SnCl) to form B?B/C/Si/Sn bonds. The substrate dependence of open‐shell versus closed‐shell pathways has been investigated.     

Synthesis and Chloride Affinity of Sterically Demanding Ditopic Lithium Bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates

The synthesis and full characterization of the sterically demanding ditopic lithium bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(Ph)pz^R₂)₂] is reported (pz^R = 3‐phenylpyrazol‐1‐yl ( 3 ^Ph), 3‐t‐butylpyrazol‐1‐yl ( 3 ^tBu)). Compound 3 ^Ph crystallizes from THF as THF‐adduct 3 ^Ph(THF)₄ which features a straight conformation with a long Li···Li distance of 12.68(1) Å. Compound 3 ^tBu was found to function as efficient and selective scavenger of chloride ions. In the presence of LiCl it forms anionic complexes [ 3 ^tBuCl]⁻ with a central Li‐Cl‐Li core (Li···Li = 3.75(1) Å).     

Deprotonation of a Seemingly Hydridic Diborane(6) To Build a B−B Bond

Deprotonation of the doubly arylene‐bridged diborane(6) derivative 1 H₂ with (Me₃Si)₃CLi or (Me₃Si)₂NK gives the B−B σ‐bonded species M[ 1 H] in essentially quantitative yields (THF, room temperature; M=Li, K, arylene=4,4′‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′‐biphenylylene). With nBuLi as the base, the yield of Li[ 1 H] drops to 20 % and the 1,1‐bis(9‐borafluorenyl)butane Li[ 2 H] is formed as a side product (30 %). In addition to the 1,1‐butanediyl fragment, the two boron atoms of Li[ 2 H] are linked by a μ‐H bridge. In the closely related molecule Li[ 3 H], the corresponding μ‐H atom can be abstracted with (Me₃Si)₃CLi to afford the B−B‐bonded conjugated base Li₂[ 3 ] (THF, 150 °C; 15 %). Li[ 1 H] and Li[ 2 H] were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography.     

Tuning Coordination in s‐Block Carbazol‐9‐yl Complexes

1,3,6,8‐Tetra‐tert‐butylcarbazol‐9‐yl and 1,8‐diaryl‐3,6‐di(tert‐butyl)carbazol‐9‐yl ligands have been utilized in the synthesis of potassium and magnesium complexes. The potassium complexes (1,3,6,8‐tBu₄carb)K(THF)₄ ( 1 ; carb=C₁₂H₄N), [(1,8‐Xyl₂‐3,6‐tBu₂carb)K(THF)]₂ ( 2 ; Xyl=3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃) and (1,8‐Mes₂‐3,6‐tBu₂carb)K(THF)₂ ( 3 ; Mes=2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂) were reacted with MgI₂ to give the Hauser bases 1,3,6,8‐tBu₄carbMgI(THF)₂ ( 4 ) and 1,8‐Ar₂‐3,6‐tBu₂carbMgI(THF) (Ar=Xyl 5 , Ar=Mes 6 ). Structural investigations of the potassium and magnesium derivatives highlight significant differences in the coordination motifs, which depend on the nature of the 1‐ and 8‐substituents: 1,8‐di(tert‐butyl)‐substituted ligands gave π‐type compounds ( 1 and 4 ), in which the carbazolyl ligand acts as a multi‐hapto donor, with the metal cations positioned below the coordination plane in a half‐sandwich conformation, whereas the use of 1,8‐diaryl substituted ligands gave σ‐type complexes ( 2 and 6 ). Space‐filling diagrams and percent buried volume calculations indicated that aryl‐substituted carbazolyl ligands offer a steric cleft better suited to stabilization of low‐coordinate magnesium complexes.     

Chiral Lithiated Allylic α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Experimental and Computational Study of Their Structure,Configurational Stability,and Enantioselective Synthesis

X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the lithiated allylic α‐sulfonyl carbanions [CH₂?CHC(Me)SO₂Ph]Li ? diglyme, [cC₆H₈SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA and [cC₇H₁₀SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA showed dimeric and monomeric CIPs, having nearly planar anionic C atoms, only O?Li bonds, almost planar allylic units with strong C?C bond length alternation and the s‐trans conformation around C1?C2. They adopt a C1?S conformation, which is similar to the one generally found for alkyl and aryl substituted α‐sulfonyl carbanions. Cryoscopy of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF at 164 K revealed an equilibrium between monomers and dimers in a ratio of 83:17, which is similar to the one found by low temperature NMR spectroscopy. According to NMR spectroscopy the lone‐pair orbital at C1 strongly interacts with the C?C double bond. Low temperature ⁶Li,¹H NOE experiments of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF point to an equilibrium between monomeric CIPs having only O?Li bonds and CIPs having both O?Li and C1?Li bonds. Ab initio calculation of [MeCH?CHC(Me)SO₂Me]Li ? (Me₂O)₂ gave three isomeric CIPs having the s‐trans conformation and three isomeric CIPs having the s‐cis conformation around the C1?C2 bond. All s‐trans isomers are more stable than the s‐cis isomers. At all levels of theory the s‐trans isomer having O?Li and C1?Li bonds is the most stable one followed by the isomer which has two O?Li bonds. The allylic unit of the C,O,Li isomer shows strong bond length alternation and the C1 atom is in contrast to the O,Li isomer significantly pyramidalized. According to NBO analysis of the s‐trans and s‐cis isomers, the interaction of the lone pair at C1 with the π* orbital of the CC double bond is energetically much more favorable than that with the “empty” orbitals at the Li atom. The C1?S and C1?C2 conformations are determined by the stereoelectronic effects n_C–σ_SR* interaction and allylic conjugation. ¹H DNMR spectroscopy of racemic [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, [iPrCH?CHC(iPr)SO₂tBu]Li and [EtCH?C(Me)C(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in [D₈]THF gave estimated barriers of enantiomerization of ΔG^≠=13.2 kcal mol^?1 (270 K), 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (291 K) and 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (295 K), respectively. Deprotonation of sulfone (R)‐EtCH?CHCH(Et)SO₂tBu (94 % ee) with nBuLi in THF at ?105 °C occurred with a calculated enantioselectivity of 93 % ee and gave carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, the deuteration and alkylation of which with CF₃CO₂D and MeOCH₂I, respectively, proceeded with high enantioselectivities. Time‐dependent deuteration of the enantioenriched carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF gave a racemization barrier of ΔG^≠=12.5 kcal mol^?1 (168 K), which translates to a calculated half‐time of racemization of t_1/2=12 min at ?105 °C.     

Reversible Dihydrogen Activation by Reduced Aryl Boranes as Main‐Group Ambiphiles

A new approach to main‐group H₂ activation combining concepts of transition‐metal and frustrated Lewis pair chemistry is reported. Ambiphilic, metal‐like reactivity toward H₂ can be conferred to 9,10‐dihydro‐9,10‐diboraanthracene (DBA) acceptors by the injection of two electrons. The resulting [DBA]^2? ions cleave the H?H bond with the formation of hydridoborates under moderate conditions (T=50–100 °C; p<1 atm). Depending on the boron‐bonded substituents R, the addition is either reversible (R=C≡CtBu) or irreversible (R=H). The reaction rate is strongly influenced by the nature and the coordination behavior of the countercation (Li⁺ slower than K⁺). Quantum‐chemical calculations support the experimental observations and suggest a concerted, homolytic addition of H₂ across both boron atoms. As proven by the successful conversion of Me₃SiCl into Me₃SiH, the system Li₂[DBA]/H₂ appears generally relevant for the hydrogenation of element–halide bonds.     

catena‐Poly­[[di­aqua­lithium(I)]‐μ‐[9H‐purine‐2,6(1H,3H)‐dionato‐O2:N7]]

In the title compound, [Li(C₅H₃N₄O₂)(H₂O)₂]_n, the coordinate geometry about the Li⁺ ion is distorted tetrahedral and the Li⁺ ion is bonded to N and O atoms of adjacent ligand mol­ecules forming an infinite polymeric chain with Li—O and Li—N bond lengths of 1.901 (5) and 2.043 (6) Å, respectively. Tetrahedral coordination at the Li⁺ ion is completed by two cis water mol­ecules [Li—O 1.985 (6) and 1.946 (6) Å]. The crystal structure is stabilized both by the polymeric structure and by a hydrogen‐bond network involving N—H?O, O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds.     

Enantioselective Synthesis of β‐Amino Acids,Part 13

Inexpensive acryloyl chloride was converted in 91% overall yield to two derivatives of β‐alanine, (R,R,R)‐ 6 and (R,R,S)‐ 6 , containing two chiral auxiliaries. C‐Alkylation of (R,R,R)‐ and (R,R,S)‐ 6 via a dianion derivative, was performed by direct metallation with 2.2 equiv. of lithium hexamethyldisilazane (LHMDS) in THF at ?78°. C‐Alkylation of (R,R,S)‐ 6 ‐Li₂ (‘matched' pair of chiral auxiliaries) afforded the mono‐alkylated products 8 – 11 in 29–96% yield and 54–95% stereoselectivity. Employment of LiCl as an additive generally increased stereoselectivities, whereas the effect of HMPA as a cosolvent was erratic. Chemical correlation of the major diastereoisomer from the alkylation reactions with (S)‐α‐alkyl‐β‐alanine ( 12 – 15 ) showed that addition of the electrophile preferentially takes place on the enolate's Si‐face. This conclusion is also supported by molecular‐modeling studies (ab initio HF/3‐21G), which indicate that the lowest‐energy conformation for (R,R,S)‐ 6 ‐Li₂ presents the more sterically hindered Re‐face of the enolate. The theoretical studies also predict a determining role for N? Li? O chelation in (R,R,S)‐ 6 ‐Li₂, giving rise to an interesting ‘ion‐triplet' configuration for the dilithium dianion.     

A Manganese(II) Coordination Polymer with Ditopic Bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate Bridges

The synthesis and characterization of the ditopic bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate ligand Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂] is reported (pz = pyrazol‐1‐yl). Compared to the corresponding t‐butyl derivative Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(t‐Bu)pz₂)₂], the C₆F₅‐substituted scorpionate is significantly more stable towards hydrolysis. Reaction of Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂] with two equivalents of MnCl₂ leads to the formation of coordination polymers {(MnCl₂)₂(Li(THF)₃)₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂]}_∞ featuring penta‐coordinate Mn^II ions chelated by one bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate fragment and further bonded to three chloride ions. Two of the three chloride ions are also coordinated to a neighbouring Mn^II ion; the third chloro ligand is shared between the Mn^II centre and a Li(THF)₃ moiety.     

Novel Synthesis of 2‐Aryl‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1,2‐benzisothiazol‐3(2H)‐ones and Their S‐Oxides

2‐Aryl‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1,2‐benzisothiazol‐3(2H)‐ones 1a – e were synthesized by cyclocondensation of 2‐(thiocyanato)cyclohexene‐1‐carboxanilides 9 as a convenient new method. Their S‐oxides 10 were prepared by two routes, either by oxidation of 1 or dehydration of rac‐cis‐3‐hydroperoxysultims 11 . Furthermore, compounds 1 have been identified by HPLC? API‐MS‐MS as intermediates in the oxidation process of the salts 6 . The hydroperoxides 12b and rac‐trans‐ 11b have been unambiguously detected by HPLC? MS investigations and in the reaction of rac‐cis‐ 13b with H₂O₂ to the hydroperoxides rac‐trans‐ 11b and rac‐cis‐ 11b .     

A Novel Divalent Ytterbium Complex Supported by a Bridged Diamide Ligand: Synthesis and Structure of [{Me2Si(NPh)2Yb(THF)2}(μ3‐Cl)(μ4‐Cl){Li(THF)}2]2·2THF

The reaction of anhydrous YbCl₃ with 1 equiv. of Li₂Me₂Si(NPh)₂ in THF, after workup, yielded a ytterbium(III) chloride [{Me₂Si(NPh)₂Yb}(μ₂‐Cl)(TMEDA)]₂·3PhMe ( 1 ) (TMEDA=tetramethylethanediamine). The same reaction followed by treatment with Na‐K alloy afforded a new ytterbium(II) complex supported by a bridged diamide with four coordinated LiCl molecules, [{Me₂Si(NPh)₂Yb(THF)₂}(μ₃‐Cl)(μ₄‐Cl){Li(THF)}₂]₂·2THF ( 2 ) in high yield. Both complexes were structurally characterized by X‐ray analysis to be dimers. Complex 1 was a chlorine‐bridged dimer with ytterbium in a distorted octahedral geometry. In complex 2 two [Me₂Si(NPh)₂Yb(THF)₂]‐(μ₃‐Cl)[Li(THF)]₂ moieties were connected with each other by two μ₄‐Cl bridges to form a "chair‐form" framework.     

Y,Lu, and Gd Complexes of NCO/NCS Pincer Ligands: Synthesis,Characterization, and Catalysis in the cis‐1,4‐Selective Polymerization of Isoprene

A series of NCO/NCS pincer precursors, 3‐(Ar²OCH₂)‐2‐Br‐(Ar¹N?CH)C₆H₃ ((^Ar1NCO^Ar2)Br, 3a , 3b , 3c , 3d ) and 3‐(2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃SCH₂)‐2‐Br‐(Ar¹N?CH)C₆H₃ ((^Ar1NCS^Me)Br, 4a and 4b ) were synthesized and characterized. The reactions of [^Ar1NCO^Ar2]Br/ [^Ar1NCS^Me]Br with nBuLi and the subsequent addition of the rare‐earth‐metal chlorides afforded their corresponding rare‐earth‐metal–pincer complexes, that is, [(^Ar1NCO^Ar2)YCl₂(thf)₂] ( 5a , 5b , 5c , 5d ), [(^Ar1NCO^Ar2)LuCl₂(thf)₂] ( 6a , 6d ), [(^Ar1NCO^Ar2)GdCl₂(thf)₂] ( 7 ), [{(^Ar1NCS^Me)Y(μ‐Cl)}₂{(μ‐Cl)Li(thf)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] ( 8 , 9 ), and [{(^Ar1NCS^Me)Gd(μ‐Cl)}₂{(μ‐Cl)Li(thf)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] ( 10 , 11 ). These diamagnetic complexes were characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and the molecular structures of compounds 5a , 6a , 7 , and 10 were well‐established by X‐ray diffraction analysis. In compounds 5a , 6a , and 7 , all of the metal centers adopted distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometries with the NCO donors and two oxygen atoms from the coordinated THF molecules in equatorial positions and the two chlorine atoms in apical positions. Complex 10 is a dimer in which the two equal moieties are linked by two chlorine atoms and two Cl? Li? Cl bridges. In each part, the gadolinium atom adopts a distorted pentagonal bipyramidal geometry. Activated with alkylaluminum and borate, the gadolinium and yttrium complexes showed various activities towards the polymerization of isoprene, thereby affording highly cis‐1,4‐selective polyisoprene, whilst the NCO? lutetium complexes were inert under the same conditions.     

Imino‐Bridged Bisphosphaalkenes (2,4‐Diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes)

Deprotonation of aminophosphaalkenes (RMe₂Si)₂C?PN(H)(R′) (R=Me, iPr; R′=tBu, 1‐adamantyl (1‐Ada), 2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂ (Mes*)) followed by reactions of the corresponding Li salts Li[(RMe₂Si)₂C?P(M)(R′)] with one equivalent of the corresponding P‐chlorophosphaalkenes (RMe₂Si)₂C?PCl provides bisphosphaalkenes (2,4‐diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes) [(RMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NR′. The thermally unstable tert‐butyliminobisphosphaalkene [(Me₃Si)₂C?P]₂NtBu ( 4 a ) undergoes isomerisation reactions by Me₃Si‐group migration that lead to mixtures of four‐membered heterocyles, but in the presence of an excess amount of (Me₃Si)₂C?PCl, 4 a furnishes an azatriphosphabicyclohexene C₃(SiMe₃)₅P₃NtBu ( 5 ) that gave red single crystals. Compound 5 contains a diphosphirane ring condensed with an azatriphospholene system that exhibits an endocylic P?C double bond and an exocyclic ylidic P⁽⁺⁾? C^(?)(SiMe₃)₂ unit. Using the bulkier iPrMe₂Si substituents at three‐coordinated carbon leads to slightly enhanced thermal stability of 2,4‐diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes [(iPrMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NR′ (R′=tBu: 4 b ; R′=1‐Ada: 8 ). According to a low‐temperature crystal‐structure determination, 8 adopts a non‐planar structure with two distinctly differently oriented P?C sites, but ³¹P NMR spectra in solution exhibit singlet signals. ³¹P NMR spectra also reveal that bulky Mes* groups (Mes*=2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂) at the central imino function lead to mixtures of symmetric and unsymmetric rotamers, thus implying hindered rotation around the P? N bonds in persistent compounds [(RMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NMes* ( 11 a , 11 b ). DFT calculations for the parent molecule [(H₃Si)₂C?P]₂NCH₃ suggest that the non‐planar distortion of compound 8 will have steric grounds.     

High‐performance amorphous donor–acceptor conjugated polymers containing x‐shaped anthracene‐based monomer and 2,5‐bis(2‐octyldodecyl)pyrrolo[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐1,4(2H,5H)‐dione for organic thin‐film transistors

New diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)‐containing amorphous conjugated polymers, such as poly(3‐(5‐((9,10‐bis((4‐hexylphenyl)ethynyl)‐6‐(prop‐1‐ynyl)anthracen‐2‐yl)ethynyl) thiophen‐2‐yl)‐5‐(2‐hexyldecyl)‐2‐(2‐octyldodecyl)‐6‐(thiophen‐2‐yl)pyrrolo[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐1,4(2H,5H)‐dione) ( 4 ), and poly(3‐(5‐((2,6‐bis((4‐hexylphenyl)ethynyl)‐10‐(prop‐1‐ynyl)anthracen‐9‐yl)ethynyl)thiophen‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐bis(2‐octyldodecyl)‐6‐(thio phen‐2‐yl)pyrrolo[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐1,4(2H,5H)‐dione) ( 7 ), were successfully synthesized via Sonogashira coupling reactions under microwave conditions. Copolymer 7 , incorporating a DPP moiety at the 9,10‐position of the anthracene ring through a triple bond, showed a much lower bandgap energy (E_g = 1.81 eV) than copolymer 4 (E_g = 2.13 eV). Tuning of the molecular frontier orbital energies was achieved by only changing the anchoring position of dithiophenyl‐DPP from the 2,6‐ to the 9,10‐position in the anthracene ring. Because of the donor–acceptor (D–A) interaction and the two‐dimensional planar structure of the X‐shaped donor monomer, the resulting polymers showed good interchain π?π stacking in the thin‐film state, despite being amorphous polymers. When the newly synthesized polymer 7 was used as a semiconductor material in an organic thin‐film transistor, the best mobility of up to 0.12 cm² V^?1 s^?1 (I_on/off = ～ 4.4 × 10⁶) was observed, which is one of the highest values recorded for amorphous polymer films reported to date. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

Lanthanide amides [(Me3Si)2N]3Ln(µ‐Cl)Li(THF)3‐catalyzed phospho‐aldol‐brook rearrangement reaction of dialkyl phosphites with isatins

The tetracoordinated lanthanide amides [(Me₃Si)₂N]₃Ln(µ‐Cl)Li(THF)₃ were found to serve as highly active catalysts for the phospho‐Aldol‐Brook rearrangement reaction of various dialkyl phosphites and isatins. The reactions produced dialkyl 2‐oxoindolin‐3‐yl phosphates in good to excellent yields in the presence of 1 mol% [(Me₃Si)₂N]₃La(µ‐Cl)Li(THF)₃ at room temperature within 5 min. A mechanism for this highly efficient process was proposed. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 23:449–456, 2012; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com . DOI 10.1002/hc.21036     

Kristallstruktur des Lithium‐Trimethylsilanolats [Li7(OSiMe3)7(THF)]

The lithium silanolate LiOSiMe₃ is accessible from the reaction of Me₃SiOSiMe₃ with LiMe in tetrahydrofuran. Single crystals of [Li₇(OSiMe₃)₇(THF)] were obtained from toluene at 25 °C. The structure of [Li₇(OSiMe₃)₇(THF)] (C2/c) features a capped trigonal antiprismatic arrangement of seven Li atoms. The Li atoms in [Li₇(OSiMe₃)₇(THF)] are μ₃‐bridged by seven O atoms of the silanolate ligand.     

Steric Effects on the Structures,Reactivity, and Coordination Chemistry of Tris(2‐pyridyl)aluminates

Introducing substituents in the 6‐position of the 2‐pyridyl rings of tris(pyridyl)aluminate anions, of the type [EtAl(2‐py′)₃]^? (py′=a substituted 2‐pyridyl group), has a large impact on their metal coordination characteristics. This is seen most remarkably in the desolvation of the THF solvate [EtAl(6‐Me‐2‐py)₃Li?THF] to give the monomer [EtAl(6‐Me‐2‐py)₃Li] ( 1 ), containing a pyramidal, three‐coordinate Li⁺ cation. Similar monomeric complexes are observed for [EtAl(6‐CF₃‐2‐py)₃Li] ( 2 ) and [EtAl(6‐Br‐2‐py)₃Li] ( 3 ), which contain CF₃ and Br substituents (R). This steric influence can be exploited in the synthesis of a new class of terminal Al?OH complexes, as is seen in the controlled hydrolysis of 2 and 3 to give [EtAl(OH)(6‐R‐2‐py)₂]^? anions, as in the dimer [EtAl(OH)(6‐Br‐2‐py)₂Li]₂ ( 5 ). Attempts to deprotonate the Al?OH group of 5 using Et₂Zn led only to the formation of the zincate complex [LiZn(6‐Br‐py)₃]₂ ( 6 ), while reactions of the 6‐Br substituted 3 and the unsubstituted complex [EtAl(2‐py)₃Li] with MeOH give [EtAl(OMe)(6‐Br‐2‐py)₂Li]₂ ( 7 ) and [EtAl(OMe)(2‐py)₂Li]₂ ( 8 ), respectively, having similar dimeric arrangements to 5 . The combined studies presented provide key synthetic methods for the functionalization and elaboration of tris(pyridyl)aluminate ligands.     

Silicon‐ and Tin‐Containing Open‐Chain and Eight‐Membered‐Ring Compounds as Bicentric Lewis Acids toward Anions

Herein, we report the syntheses of silicon‐ and tin‐containing open‐chain and eight‐membered‐ring compounds Me₂Si(CH₂SnMe₂X)₂ ( 2 , X=Me; 3 , X=Cl; 4 , X=F), CH₂(SnMe₂CH₂I)₂ ( 7 ), CH₂(SnMe₂CH₂Cl)₂ ( 8 ), cyclo‐Me₂Sn(CH₂SnMe₂CH₂)₂SiMe₂ ( 6 ), cyclo‐(Me₂SnCH₂)₄ ( 9 ), cyclo‐Me_(2?n)X_nSn(CH₂SiMe₂CH₂)₂SnX_nMe_(2?n) ( 5 , n=0; 10 , n = 1, X= Cl; 11 , n=1, X= F; 12 , n=2, X= Cl), and the chloride and fluoride complexes NEt₄[cyclo‐ Me(Cl)Sn(CH₂SiMe₂CH₂)₂Sn(Cl)Me?F] ( 13 ), PPh₄[cyclo‐Me(Cl)Sn(CH₂SiMe₂CH₂)₂Sn(Cl)Me?Cl] ( 14 ), NEt₄[cyclo‐Me(F)Sn(CH₂SiMe₂CH₂)₂Sn(F)Me?F] ( 15 ), [NEt₄]₂[cyclo‐Cl₂Sn(CH₂SiMe₂CH₂)₂SnCl₂?2 Cl] ( 16 ), M[Me₂Si(CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂)₂?Cl] ( 17 a , M=PPh₄; 17 b , M=NEt₄), NEt₄[Me₂Si(CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂)₂?F] ( 18 ), NEt₄[Me₂Si(CH₂Sn(F)Me₂)₂?F] ( 19 ), and PPh₄[Me₂Si(CH₂Sn(Cl)Me₂)₂?Br] ( 20 ). The compounds were characterised by electrospray mass‐spectrometric, IR and ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁹F, ²⁹Si, and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopic analysis, and, except for 15 and 18 , single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Deprotonation of a Seemingly Hydridic Diborane(6) To Build a B−B Bond

Deprotonation of the doubly arylene-bridged diborane(6) derivative 1 H₂ with (Me₃Si)₃CLi or (Me₃Si)₂NK gives the B−B σ-bonded species M[ 1 H] in essentially quantitative yields (THF, room temperature; M=Li, K, arylene=4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-biphenylylene). With nBuLi as the base, the yield of Li[ 1 H] drops to 20 % and the 1,1-bis(9-borafluorenyl)butane Li[ 2 H] is formed as a side product (30 %). In addition to the 1,1-butanediyl fragment, the two boron atoms of Li[ 2 H] are linked by a μ-H bridge. In the closely related molecule Li[ 3 H], the corresponding μ-H atom can be abstracted with (Me₃Si)₃CLi to afford the B−B-bonded conjugated base Li₂[ 3 ] (THF, 150 °C; 15 %). Li[ 1 H] and Li[ 2 H] were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography.     

Reactivity Studies of η5‐ Indenyl and η5‐Cp* Ruthenium(II) Complexes towards some Polypyridyl Ligands

The reaction of [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂Cl], where; L³ = C₉H₇ ( 1 ), C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ( 2 ) with acetonitrile in the presence of [NH₄][PF₆] yielded cationic complexes [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆]; L³= C₉H₇ ([3]PF₆) and L³ = C₅Me₅ ([4]PF₆), respectively. Complexes [3]PF₆ and [4]PF₆ reacts with some polypyridyl ligands viz, 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) pyrazine (bpp), 2,3‐bis (α‐pyridyl) quinoxaline (bpq) yielding the complexes of the formulation [(η⁵‐L³)Ru(PPh₃)(L²)]PF₆ where; L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpp, ([5]PF₆), L³ = C₉H₇, L² = bpq, ([6]PF₆); L³ = C₅Me₅, L² = bpp, ([7]PF₆) and bpq, ([8]PF₆), respectively. However reaction of [(η⁵‐C₉H₇)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CH₃CN)][PF₆] ([3]PF₆) with the sterically demanding polypyridyl ligands, viz. 2,4,6‐tris(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tptz) or tetra‐2‐pyridyl‐1,4‐pyrazine (tppz) leads to the formation of unexpected complexes [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)(CH₃CN)][PF₆]₂; L² = tppz ([9](PF₆)₂), tptz ([11](PF₆)₂) and [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L²)Cl][PF₆]; L² = tppz ([10]PF₆), tptz ([12]PF₆). The complexes were isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts. They have been characterized on the basis of micro analytical and spectroscopic data. The crystal structures of the representative complexes were established by X‐ray crystallography.