Thermochemical properties of the coordination complex of 8-hydroxyquinolinato-bis-(salicylato) praseodymium (III)

The product, [Pr(C₇H₅O₃)₂(C₉H₆NO)], which was formed by praseodymium nitrate hexahydrate, salicylic acid (C₇H₆O₃), and 8-hydroxyquinoline (C₉H₇NO), was synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, UV spectra, IR spectra, molar conductance, and thermogravimetric analysis. In an optimalizing calorimetric solvent, the dissolution enthalpies of [Pr(NO₃)₃·6H₂O(s)], [2 C₇H₆O₃(s) + C₉H₇NO(s)], [Pr(C₇H₅O₃)₂(C₉H₆NO)(s)], and [solution D (aq)] were measured to be, by means of a solution-reaction isoperibol microcalorimeter, $ \begin{gathered}\Updelta_{\text{s}} H_{\text{m}}^{\theta}\left[ {{ \Pr }\left( {{\text{NO}}_{ 3} } \right)_{ 3} \cdot 6{\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}\left( {\text{s}} \right), 2 9 8. 1 5{\text{ K}}} \right] \, = - ( 20. 6 6 { } \pm \, 0. 29)\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} , \\\Updelta_{\text{s}} H_{\text{m}}^{\theta } \left[ { 2 {\text{C}}_{7} {\text{H}}_{ 6} {\text{O}}_{ 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) +{\text{ C}}_{ 9} {\text{H}}_{ 7} {\text{NO}}\left( {\text{s}}\right),{ 298}. 1 5 {\text{ K}}} \right] \, = \, ( 4 2. 2 7 { }\pm \, 0. 3 1)\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} , \\\Updelta_{\text{s}} H_{\text{m}}^{\theta } \left[ {{\text{solutionD }}\left( {\text{aq}} \right), 2 9 8. 1 5 {\text{ K}}} \right] \,= - \left( { 8 9. 1 5 { } \pm \, 0. 4 3}\right)\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} , \\\end{gathered} $ Δ s H m θ [ Pr ( NO 3 ) 3 · 6 H 2 O ( s ) , 2 9 8.1 5 K ] = ? ( 20.6 6 ± 0.2 9 ) kJ mol ? 1 , Δ s H m θ [ 2 C 7 H 6 O 3 ( s ) + C 9 H 7 NO ( s ) , 298.1 5 K ] = ( 4 2.2 7 ± 0.3 1 ) kJ mol ? 1 , Δ s H m θ [ solution D ( aq ) , 2 9 8.1 5 K ] = ? ( 8 9.1 5 ± 0.4 3 ) kJ mol ? 1 , and $ \Updelta_{\text{s}} H_{\text{m}}^{\theta } \left\{ {\left[ {{\Pr }\left( {{\text{C}}_{ 7} {\text{H}}_{ 5} {\text{O}}_{ 3} }\right)_{ 2} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 9} {\text{H}}_{ 6} {\text{NO}}}\right)} \right]\left( {\text{s}} \right),{ 298}. 1 5 {\text{ K}}}\right\} \, = - \left( { 4 1.0 4 { } \pm \, 0. 3 3}\right)\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} $ Δ s H m θ { [ Pr ( C 7 H 5 O 3 ) 2 ( C 9 H 6 NO ) ] ( s ) , 298.1 5 K } = ? ( 4 1.0 4 ± 0.3 3 ) kJ mol ? 1 , respectively. Through an improved thermochemical cycle, the enthalpy change of the designed coordination reaction was calculated to be $\Updelta_{\text{r}} H_{\text{m}}^{\theta} = \, ( 2 1 3. 1 8\pm0. 6 9)\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} $ Δ r H m θ = ( 2 1 3.1 8 ± 0.6 9 ) kJ mol ? 1 , the standard molar enthalpy of the formation was determined as $ \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\theta} \left\{ {\left[ {{\Pr }\left( {{\text{C}}_{ 7} {\text{H}}_{ 5} {\text{O}}_{ 3} }\right)_{ 2} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 9} {\text{H}}_{ 6} {\text{NO}}}\right)} \right]\left( {\text{s}} \right), 2 9 8. 1 5 {\text{K}}}\right\} \, = \, - \, ( 1 8 7 5. 4\pm 3.1)\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} $ Δ f H m θ { [ Pr ( C 7 H 5 O 3 ) 2 ( C 9 H 6 NO ) ] ( s ) , 2 9 8.1 5 K } = ? ( 1 8 7 5.4 ± 3.1 ) kJ mol ? 1 .     

Enthalpy increments and thermodynamic functions of rare earth samarium titanates RESmTi<Subscript>2</Subscript>O<Subscript>7</Subscript>(s) (RE = Gd,Dy)

Enthalpy measurements have been taken on GdSmTi₂O₇ and DySmTi₂O₇ by using a high-temperature differential calorimeter at temperature between 800 and 1655 K. Thermodynamic function, such as heat capacity, entropy and Gibbs energy functions of GdSmTi₂O₇ and DySmTi₂O₇, was derived using the data obtained in this study. The results are presented and compared with the data available in the literature. The polynomial expression of enthalpy increments obtained for GdSmTi₂O₇(s) and DySmTi₂O₇(s) in the temperature range 298–1700 K is given as: \(\begin{aligned} H_{\text{T}}^{0} - H_{298}^{0} / {\text{J}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} & = 252.961\,T \, + 1.596 \times 10^{ - 2} \,T^{2} + 3.705 \times 10^{6} \,T^{ - 1} - 89{,}265\quad ({\text{GdSmTi}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{7} ) \\ H_{\text{T}}^{0} - H_{298}^{0} / {\text{J}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} & = 256.504\,T \, + 1.576 \times 10^{ - 2} \,T^{2} + 3.531 \times 10^{6} \,T^{ - 1} - 89{,}721\quad \left( {{\text{DySmTi}}_{2} {\text{O}}_{7} } \right). \\ \end{aligned}\)     

Crystal structure and thermochemical properties of bis(1-octylammonium) tetrachlorocuprate

Bis(1-octylammonium) tetrachlorocuprate (1-C₈H₁₇NH₃)₂CuCl₄(s) was synthesized by the method of liquid phase reaction. The crystal structure of the compound has been determined by X-ray crystallography. The lattice potential energy was obtained from the crystallographic data. Molar enthalpies of dissolution of (1-C₈H₁₇NH₃)₂CuCl₄(s) at various molalities were measured at 298.15?K in the double-distilled water by means of an isoperibol solution-reaction calorimeter, respectively. In terms of Pitzer??s electrolyte solution theory, the molar enthalpy of dissolution of (1-C₈H₁₇NH₃)₂CuCl₄(s) at infinite dilution was determined to be $ \Updelta_{\rm s} H_{\text{m}}^{\infty } = \, - 5. 9 7 2\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} , $ and the sums of Pitzer??s parameters $ (4\beta_{{{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 1 7} {\text{NH}}_{ 3} , {\text{Cl}}}}^{ ( 0 )L} + 2\beta_{\text{Cu,Cl}}^{ ( 0 )L} + \theta_{{{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 1 7} {\text{NH}}_{ 3} , {\text{Cu}}}}^{L} ) $ and $ (2\beta_{{{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 1 7} {\text{NH}}_{ 3} , {\text{Cl}}}}^{ ( 1 )L} + \beta_{\text{Cu,Cl}}^{ ( 1 )L} ) $ were obtained.     

Determination of thermodynamic properties of YRhO3(s) by solid-state electrochemical cell and differential scanning calorimeter

The standard molar Gibbs free energy of formation of YRhO₃(s) has been determined using a solid-state electrochemical cell wherein calcia-stabilized zirconia was used as an electrolyte. The cell can be represented by: ( - )\textPt - Rh/{ \textY₂\textO_\text3( \texts ) + \textYRh\textO₃( \texts ) + \textRh( \texts ) }//\textCSZ//\textO₂( p( \textO₂ ) = 21.21  \textkPa )/\textPt - Rh( + ) \left( - \right){\text{Pt - Rh/}}\left\{ {{{\text{Y}}_2}{{\text{O}}_{\text{3}}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + {\text{YRh}}{{\text{O}}_3}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + {\text{Rh}}\left( {\text{s}} \right)} \right\}//{\text{CSZ//}}{{\text{O}}_2}\left( {p\left( {{{\text{O}}_2}} \right) = 21.21\;{\text{kPa}}} \right)/{\text{Pt - Rh}}\left( + \right) . The electromotive force was measured in the temperature range from 920.0 to 1,197.3 K. The standard molar Gibbs energy of the formation of YRhO₃(s) from elements in their standard state using this electrochemical cell has been calculated and can be represented by: D_\textfG^\texto{ \textYRh\textO₃( \texts ) }/\textkJ  \textmo\textl ^{- 1}( ±1.61 ) = - 1,147.4 + 0.2815  T  ( \textK ) {\Delta_{\text{f}}}{G^{\text{o}}}\left\{ {{\text{YRh}}{{\text{O}}_3}\left( {\text{s}} \right)} \right\}/{\text{kJ}}\;{\text{mo}}{{\text{l}}^{ - 1}}\left( {\pm 1.61} \right) = - 1,147.4 + 0.2815\;T\;\left( {\text{K}} \right) . Standard molar heat capacity C^o_p,m C^{o}_{{p,m}} (T) of YRhO₃(s) was measured using a heat flux-type differential scanning calorimeter in two different temperature ranges from 127 to 299 K and 305 to 646 K. The heat capacity in the higher temperature range was fitted into a polynomial expression and can be represented by: $ {*{20}{c}} {\mathop C\nolimits_{p,m}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{YRh}}{{\text{O}}_3},{\text{s,}}T} \right)\left( {{\text{J}}\;{{\text{K}}^{ - 1}}{\text{mo}}{{\text{l}}^{ - 1}}} \right)} & { = 109.838 + 23.318 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}T\left( {\text{K}} \right)} & { - 12.5964 \times {{10}^5}/{T^2}\left( {\text{K}} \right).} \\ {} & {\left( {305 \leqslant T\left( {\text{K}} \right) \leqslant 646} \right)} & {} \\ $ \begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\mathop C\nolimits_{p,m}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{YRh}}{{\text{O}}_3},{\text{s,}}T} \right)\left( {{\text{J}}\;{{\text{K}}^{ - 1}}{\text{mo}}{{\text{l}}^{ - 1}}} \right)} & { = 109.838 + 23.318 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}T\left( {\text{K}} \right)} & { - 12.5964 \times {{10}^5}/{T^2}\left( {\text{K}} \right).} \\ {} & {\left( {305 \leqslant T\left( {\text{K}} \right) \leqslant 646} \right)} & {} \\ \end{array} The heat capacity of YRhO₃(s) was used along with the data obtained from the electrochemical cell to calculate the standard enthalpy and entropy of formation of the compound at 298.15 K.     

Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of the chromium(III)-DL-aspartic acid complex/periodate reaction. Evidence for iron(II) catalysis

The kinetics of oxidation of the chromium(III)-DL- aspartic acid complex, [CrIIIHL]+ by periodate have been investigated in aqueous medium. In the presence of Fe^II as a catalyst, the following rate law is obeyed:

Thermal decomposition kinetics of bis(pyridine)manganese(II) chloride

The thermal stability and the decomposition steps of bis(pyridine)manganese(II) chloride (Mn(py)₂Cl₂) were determined by thermogravimetry and derivative thermogravimetry. The initial compound and the solid compounds resulted from each step of decomposition were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy and RX diffraction. It was pointed out that at the progressive heating of Mn(py)₂Cl₂, the following decomposition reactions occur: I $$ {\text{Mn}}\left( {\text{py}} \right)_{ 2} {\text{Cl}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) \, \to {\text{ Mn}}\left( {\text{py}} \right){\text{Cl}}_{ 2} \;\left( {\text{s}} \right) \, + {\text{ Py }}\left( {\text{g}} \right) $$ II $$ {\text{Mn}}\left( {\text{py}} \right){\text{Cl}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) \, \to {\text{ Mn}}\left( {\text{py}} \right)_{ 2/ 3} {\text{Cl}}_{ 2} \;\left( {\text{s}} \right) \, + { 1}/ 3 {\text{ Py }}\left( {\text{g}} \right) $$ III $$ {\text{Mn}}\left( {\text{py}} \right)_{ 2/ 3} {\text{Cl}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) \, \to {\text{ MnCl}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) \, + { 2}/ 3 {\text{ Py }}\left( {\text{g}} \right) $$ The dependence of the activation energy of these decompositions steps on the conversion degree, evaluated by isoconversional methods, shows that all decomposition reactions are complex. The mechanism and the corresponding kinetic parameters of reaction (I) were determined by multivariate non-linear regression program and checked for quasi-isothermal data. It was pointed out that the reaction (I) consists of three elementary steps, each step having a specific kinetic triplet.     

Kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of hydroxylamine by tetrachloroaurate(III) ion

The oxidation of H₂NOH is first-order both in [NH₃OH⁺] and [AuCl₄ ^–]. The rate is increased by the increase in [Cl^–] and decreased with increase in [H⁺]. The stoichiometry ratio, [NH₃OH⁺]/[AuCl₄ ^–], is 1. The mechanism consists of the following reactions.

Kinetics and mechanism of Am(III) extraction with TODGA

In the present paper, N,N,N’,N’-tetraoctyl diglycolamide (TODGA) as the extractant and n-dodecane as the diluent, the extraction kinetics behavior of Am(III) in TODGA/n-dodecane–HNO₃ system were studied, including stirring speed, the interfacial area, extractant concentration in n-dodecane, extracted ions concentration, acidity of aqueous phase and temperature. The results show that: the extraction process is controlled by diffusion mode under 130 rpm of stirring speed and by chemical reaction mode above 150 rpm. The extraction rate equation and the apparent extraction rate constant of Am(III) by TODGA/n-dodecane in 170 rpm and at 25 °C are followed as: $$ \begin{aligned} r_{0} = \left. {\frac{{{\text{d}}[{\text{M}}]_{{{\text{org}} .}} }}{{{\text{d}}{{t}}}}} \right|_{t = 0} & = k\,\frac{S}{V}\left[ {\text{Am}} \right]_{{{\text{aq}} . ,0}}^{0.94} \left[ {{\text{HNO}}_{3} } \right]_{{{\text{aq}} . ,0}}^{1.05} \left[ {\text{TODGA}} \right]_{{{\text{org}} . ,0}}^{1.19} \\ & \quad k = \left( {24.17 \pm 3.43} \right) \times 10^{ - 3} \,{\text{mol}}^{ - 2.18} \,L^{2.18} \,{ \hbox{min} }^{ - 1} \,{\text{cm}},\;E_{\text{a}} \left( {{\text{Am}}\left( {\text{III}} \right)} \right) = 25.94 \pm 0.98\;{\text{kJ/mol}} .\\ \end{aligned} $$      

Synergistic extraction of some univalent cations into nitrobenzene by using sodium dicarbollylcobaltate and nonactin

From extraction experiments and γ-activity measurements, the exchange extraction constants corresponding to the general equilibrium $ {\text{M}}^{ + } \left( {\text{aq}} \right) \, + {\mathbf{1}}\cdot{\text{Na}}^{ + } \left( {\text{nb}} \right) \Leftrightarrow {\mathbf{1}}\cdot{\text{M}}^{ + } \left( {\text{nb}} \right) \, + {\text{Na}}^{ + } \left( {\text{aq}} \right) $ taking place in the two-phase water–nitrobenzene system $ \begin{gathered} ({\text{M}}^{ + } = {\text{ Li}}^{ + } ,{\text{ K}}^{ + } ,{\text{ Rb}}^{ + } ,{\text{ Cs}}^{ + } ,{\text{ H}}_{ 3} {\text{O}}^{ + } ,{\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + }, {\text{ Ag}}^{ + } ,{\text{ Tl}}^{ + } ;{\mathbf{1}} \\ = {\text{ nonactin}};{\text{ aq }} = {\text{ aqueous phase}},{\text{ nb }} = {\text{nitrobenzene phase}}) \\ \end{gathered} $ were determined. Moreover, the stability constants of the 1·M⁺ complexes in water-saturated nitrobenzene were calculated; they were found to increase in the series of $ {\text{Cs}}^{ + } < {\text{ Rb}}^{ + } < {\text{ H}}_{ 3} {\text{O}}^{ + } ,{\text{ Ag}}^{ + } < {\text{ Tl}}^{ + } < {\text{ Li}}^{ + } < {\text{ K}}^{ + } < {\text{NH}}_{4}^{ + } $ .     

System Zn–Rh–O: heat capacity and Gibbs free energy of formation using differential scanning calorimeter and electrochemical cell

The standard molar Gibbs free energy of formation of ZnRh₂O₄(s) has been determined using an oxide solid-state electrochemical cell wherein calcia-stabilized zirconia (CSZ) was used as an electrolyte. The oxide cell can be represented by: . The electromotive force was measured in the temperature range from 943.9 to 1,114.2 K. The standard molar Gibbs energy of formation of ZnRh₂O₄(s) from elements in their standard state using the oxide electrochemical cell has been calculated and can be represented by: . Standard molar heat capacity C ^o _p,m(T) of ZnRh₂O₄(s) was measured using a heat flux-type differential scanning calorimeter in two different temperature ranges, from 127 to 299 and 307 to 845 K. The heat capacity in the higher temperature range was fitted into a polynomial expression and can be represented by: . The heat capacity of ZnRh₂O₄(s), was used along with the data obtained from the oxide electrochemical cell to calculate the standard enthalpy and entropy of formation of the compound at 298.15 K.     

Improvement of the electrochemical properties of “as-grown” boron-doped polycrystalline diamond electrodes deposited on tungsten wires using ethanol

The electrochemical properties of boron-doped diamond (BDD) polycrystalline films grown on tungsten wire substrates using ethanol as a precursor are described. The results obtained show that the use of ethanol improves the electrochemistry properties of “as-grown” BDD, as it minimizes the graphitic phase upon the surface of BDD, during the growth process. The BDD electrodes were characterized by Raman spectroscopy, scanning electronic microscopy, cyclic voltammetry (CV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The boron-doping levels of the films were estimated to be ∼10²⁰ B/cm³. The electrochemical behavior was evaluated using the and redox couples and dopamine. Apparent heterogeneous electro-transfer rate constants were determined for these redox systems using the CV and EIS techniques. values in the range of 0.01–0.1 cm s⁻¹ were observed for the and redox couples, while in the special case of dopamine, a lower value of 10⁻⁵ cm s⁻¹ was found. The obtained results showed that the use of CH₃CH₂OH (ethanol) as a carbon source constitutes a promising alternative for manufacturing BDD electrodes for electroanalytical applications.     

Inner-sphere oxidation of a ternary dipicolinatochromium(III) complex involving a malonic acid co-ligand

The oxidation of a ternary complex of chromium(III), [Cr^III(DPA)(Mal)(H₂O)₂]^?, involving dipicolinic acid (DPA) as primary ligand and malonic acid (Mal) as co-ligand, was investigated in aqueous acidic medium. The periodate oxidation kinetics of [Cr^III(DPA)(Mal)(H₂O)₂]^? to give Cr(VI) under pseudo-first-order conditions were studied at various pH, ionic strength and temperature values. The kinetic equation was found to be as follows: \( {\text{Rate}} = {{\left[ {{\text{IO}}_{4}^{ - } } \right]\left[ {{\text{Cr}}^{\text{III}} } \right]_{\text{T}} \left( {{{k_{5} K_{5} + k_{6} K_{4} K_{6} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{k_{5} K_{5} + k_{6} K_{4} K_{6} } {\left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right]}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right]}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left[ {{\text{IO}}_{4}^{ - } } \right]\left[ {{\text{Cr}}^{\text{III}} } \right]_{\text{T}} \left( {{{k_{5} K_{5} + k_{6} K_{4} K_{6} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{k_{5} K_{5} + k_{6} K_{4} K_{6} } {\left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right]}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right]}}} \right)} {\left\{ {\left( {\left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right] + K_{4} } \right) + \left( {K_{5} \left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right] + K_{6} K_{4} } \right)\left[ {{\text{IO}}_{4}^{ - } } \right]} \right\}}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\left\{ {\left( {\left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right] + K_{4} } \right) + \left( {K_{5} \left[ {{\text{H}}^{ + } } \right] + K_{6} K_{4} } \right)\left[ {{\text{IO}}_{4}^{ - } } \right]} \right\}}} \) where k ₆ (3.65 × 10^?3 s^?1) represents the electron transfer reaction rate constant and K ₄ (4.60 × 10^?4 mol dm^?3) represents the dissociation constant for the reaction \( \left[ {{\text{Cr}}^{\text{III}} \left( {\text{DPA}} \right)\left( {\text{Mal}} \right)\left( {{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}} \right)_{2} } \right]^{ - } \rightleftharpoons \left[ {{\text{Cr}}^{\text{III}} \left( {\text{DPA}} \right)\left( {\text{Mal}} \right)\left( {{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}} \right)\left( {\text{OH}} \right)} \right]^{2 - } + {\text{H}}^{ + } \) and K ₅ (1.87 mol^?1 dm³) and K ₆ (22.83 mol^?1 dm³) represent the pre-equilibrium formation constants at 30 °C and I = 0.2 mol dm^?3. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was found to enhance the reaction rate, whereas sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) had no effect. The thermodynamic activation parameters were estimated, and the oxidation is proposed to proceed via an inner-sphere mechanism involving the coordination of IO₄ ^? to Cr(III).     

Investigations on NH4VO3 thermal decomposition in dry air

The results of investigations on thermal decomposition of NH₄VO₃ in dry air have been presented. TG?CDSC measurements were carried out under non-isothermal conditions at linear change of samples temperature in time and under isothermal conditions. Characterization of the products structure was performed by XRD method. MS method was used to determine evolved gaseous products. The decomposition of NH₄VO₃ was described by the following equation: $$ 6 {\text{NH}}_{ 4} {\text{VO}}_{ 3} \to \, \left( {{\text{NH}}_{ 4} } \right)_{ 3} {\text{V}}_{ 6} {\text{O}}_{ 1 6} \to \, \left( {{\text{NH}}_{ 4} } \right)_{ 2} {\text{V}}_{ 6} {\text{O}}_{ 1 6} \to {\text{ V}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 5}.$$      

Mechanism of the catalyzed by cysteine electroreduction of the insoluble in water cobalt(II) salt as a component of carbon paste electrode

The mechanism of the Co(II) catalytic electroreduction of water insoluble CoR₂ salt in the presence of cysteine was developed. CoR₂ = cobalt(II) cyclohexylbutyrate is the component of a carbon paste electrode. Electrode surface consecutive reactions are: (a) fast (equilibrium) reaction of the complex formation, (b) rate-determining reversible reaction of the promoting process of CoR(Ac⁺) complex formation, (c) rate-determining irreversible reaction of the electroactive complex formation with ligand-induced adsorption, and (d) fast irreversible reaction of the electroreduction. Reactions (a,b) connected with CoR₂ dissolution and reactions (c,d) connected with CoR₂ electroreduction are catalyzed by . Regeneration of (reactions “b,d”) and accumulation of atomic Co(0) (reaction “d”) take place. Experimental data [Sugawara et al., Bioelectrochem Bioenergetics 26:469, 1991]: i _a vs E (i _a is anodic peak, E is cathodic accumulation potential), i _a vs , and i _a vs pH have been quantitatively explained.     

Thermodynamic studies on Pr2TeO6

The standard Gibbs energy of formation of Pr₂TeO₆ $ (\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} ,\;{\text{s}}} \right)) $ was derived from its vapour pressure in the temperature range of 1,400–1,480 K. The vapour pressure of TeO₂ (g) was measured by employing a thermogravimetry-based transpiration method. The temperature dependence of the vapour pressure of TeO₂ over the mixture Pr₂TeO₆ (s) + Pr₂O₃ (s) generated by the incongruent vapourization reaction, Pr₂TeO₆ (s) = Pr₂O₃ (s) + TeO₂ (g) + ½ O₂ (g) could be represented as: $ { \log }\left\{ {{{p\left( {{\text{TeO}}_{ 2} ,\;{\text{g}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{p\left( {{\text{TeO}}_{ 2} ,\;{\text{g}}} \right)} {{\text{Pa}} \pm 0.0 4}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{\text{Pa}} \pm 0.0 4}}} \right\} = 19. 12- 27132\; \left({\rm{{{\text{K}}}}/T} \right) $ . The $ \Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \;\left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} } \right) $ could be represented by the relation $ \left\{ {{{\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} ,\;{\text{s}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{^\circ } \left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} ,\;{\text{s}}} \right)} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0em} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}} \pm 5.0} \right\} = - 2 4 1 5. 1+ 0. 5 7 9 3\;\left(T/{\text{K}}\right) .$ Enthalpy increments of Pr₂TeO₆ were measured by drop calorimetry in the temperature range of 573–1,273 K and heat capacity, entropy and Gibbs energy functions were derived. The $ \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{{298\;{\text{K}}}}^{^\circ } \;\left( {{ \Pr }_{ 2} {\text{TeO}}_{ 6} } \right) $ was found to be $ {{ - 2, 40 7. 8 \pm 2.0} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 2, 40 7. 8 \pm 2.0} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0em} {\left( {{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} } \right)}} $ .     

Thermochemistry of paracetamol

Combustion calorimetry, Calvet-drop sublimation calorimetry, and the Knudsen effusion method were used to determine the standard (p ^o = 0.1 MPa) molar enthalpies of formation of monoclinic (form I) and gaseous paracetamol, at T = 298.15 K: \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text cr I ) = - ( 4 10.4 ±1. 3)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ cr I}}} \right) = - ( 4 10.4 \pm 1. 3){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} and \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text g ) = - ( 2 80.5 ±1. 9)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} . \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ g}}} \right) = - ( 2 80.5 \pm 1. 9){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} . From the obtained \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text cr I ) \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ cr I}}} \right) value and published data, it was also possible to derive the standard molar enthalpies of formation of the two other known polymorphs of paracetamol (forms II and III), at 298.15 K: \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text crII ) = - ( 40 8.4 ±1. 3)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ crII}}} \right) = - ( 40 8.4 \pm 1. 3){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} and \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text crIII ) = - ( 40 7.4 ±1. 3)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} . \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ crIII}}} \right) = - ( 40 7.4 \pm 1. 3){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} . The proposed \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textO ₂ \textN,\text g ) \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{O}}_{ 2} {\text{N}},{\text{ g}}} \right) value, together with the experimental enthalpies of formation of acetophenone and 4′-hydroxyacetophenone, taken from the literature, and a re-evaluated enthalpy of formation of acetanilide, \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto ( \textC ₈ \textH ₉ \textON,\text g ) = - ( 10 9. 2 ± 2. 2)\text kJ  \textmol ^{- 1} , \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} \left( {{\text{C}}_{ 8} {\text{H}}_{ 9} {\text{ON}},{\text{ g}}} \right) = - ( 10 9. 2\,\pm\,2. 2){\text{ kJ}}\;{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} , were used to assess the predictions of the B3LYP/cc-pVTZ and CBS-QB3 methods for the enthalpy of a isodesmic and isogyric reaction involving those species. This test supported the reliability of the theoretical methods, and indicated a good thermodynamic consistency between the \Updelta_\textf H_\textm^\texto \Updelta_{\text{f}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} (C₈H₉O₂N, g) value obtained in this study and the remaining experimental data used in the \Updelta_\textr H_\textm^\texto \Updelta_{\text{r}} H_{\text{m}}^{\text{o}} calculation. It also led to the conclusion that the presently recommended enthalpy of formation of gaseous acetanilide in Cox and Pilcher and Pedley’s compilations should be corrected by ~20 kJ mol⁻¹.     

Layer-by-layer self-assembly and electrocatalytic properties of poly(ethylenimine)-silicotungstate multilayer composite films

Hybrid multilayer films composed of poly(ethylenimine) and the Keggin-type polyoxometalates [ SiW₁₁O₃₉ ]^{8 -} ( SiW₁₁ ) {\left[ {{\hbox{Si}}{{\hbox{W}}_{{11}}}{{\hbox{O}}_{{39}}}} \right]^{{8} - }}\left( {{\hbox{Si}}{{\hbox{W}}_{{11}}}} \right) and [ SiW₁₁Co^II( H₂O )O₃₉ ]^{6 -} ( SiW₁₁Co ) {\left[ {{\hbox{Si}}{{\hbox{W}}_{{11}}}{\hbox{C}}{{\hbox{o}}^{\rm{II}}}\left( {{{\hbox{H}}_2}{\hbox{O}}} \right){{\hbox{O}}_{{39}}}} \right]^{{6} - }}\left( {{\hbox{Si}}{{\hbox{W}}_{{11}}}{\hbox{Co}}} \right) were prepared on glassy carbon electrodes by layer-by-layer self-assembly, and were characterized by cyclic voltammetry and scanning electron microscopy. UV-vis absorption spectroscopy of films deposited on quartz slides was used to monitor film growth, showing that the absorbance values at characteristic wavelengths of the multilayer films increase almost linearly with the number of bilayers. Cyclic voltammetry indicates that the electrochemical properties of the polyoxometalates are maintained in the multilayer films, and that the first tungsten reduction process for immobilized SiW₁₁ and SiW₁₁Co is a surface-confined process. Electron transfer to [ Fe( CN )₆ ]^{3 - /4 -} {\left[ {{\hbox{Fe}}{{\left( {\hbox{CN}} \right)}_6}} \right]^{{3} - /{4} - }} and [ Ru( NH₃ )₆ ]^{3 + /2 +} {\left[ {{\hbox{Ru}}{{\left( {{\hbox{N}}{{\hbox{H}}_3}} \right)}_6}} \right]^{{3} + /{2} + }} as electrochemical probes was also investigated by cyclic voltammetry. The (PEI/SiW₁₁Co)_n multilayer films showed excellent electrocatalytic reduction properties towards nitrite, bromate and iodate.     

Catenated Gallium Compounds Supported by a<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Tris</Emphasis>(pyrazolyl)hydroborato Ligand

[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]M (M = K, Tl) reacts with “GaI” to give a series of compounds that feature Ga–Ga bonds, namely [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→GaI₃, [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]GaGaI₂GaI₂( \textHpz^\textMe₂ {\text{Hpz}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ) and [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga(GaI₂)₂Ga[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ], in addition to the cationic, mononuclear Ga(III) complex {[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]₂Ga}⁺. Likewise, [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]M (M = K, Tl) reacts with (HGaCl₂) ₂ and Ga[GaCl₄] to give [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→GaCl₃, {[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]₂Ga}[GaCl₄], and {[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]GaGa[ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]}[GaCl₄]₂. The adduct [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→B(C₆F₅)₃ may be obtained via treatment of [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]K with “GaI” followed by addition of B(C₆F₅)₃. Comparison of the deviation from planarity of the GaY₃ ligands in [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→GaY₃ (Y = Cl, I) and [ \textTm^{\textBu\textt} {\text{Tm}}^{{{\text{Bu}}^{\text{t}} }} ]Ga→GaY₃, as evaluated by the sum of the Y–Ga–Y bond angles, Σ(Y–Ga–Y), indicates that the [ \textTm^{\textBu\textt} {\text{Tm}}^{{{\text{Bu}}^{\text{t}} }} ]Ga moiety is a marginally better donor than [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga. In contrast, the displacement from planarity for the B(C₆F₅)₃ ligand of [ \textTp^\textMe₂ {\text{Tp}}^{{{\text{Me}}_{2} }} ]Ga→B(C₆F₅)₃ is greater than that of [ \textTm^{\textBu\textt} {\text{Tm}}^{{{\text{Bu}}^{\text{t}} }} ]Ga→B(C₆F₅)₃, an observation that is interpreted in terms of interligand steric interactions in the former complex compressing the C–B–C bond angles.     

Extraction kinetics of Uranium(VI) and Thorium(IV) with Tri-iso-amyl phosphate from nitric acid using a Lewis Cell

The extraction kinetics of uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) with Tri-iso-amyl phosphate (TiAP) from nitric acid medium has been investigated using a Lewis Cell. Especially, dependences of the extraction rate on stirring speed, temperature, interfacial area were firstly measured to elucidate the extraction kinetics regimes. The experimental results demonstrated that extraction kinetic of U(VI) is governed by chemical reactions at interface with an activation energy, E_a, of 43.41 kJ/mol, while the rate of Th(IV) extraction is proved to be intermediate controlled, of which the E_a is 23.20 kJ/mol. Reaction orders with respect to the influencing parameters of the extraction rate are determined, and the rate equations of U(VI) and Th(IV) at 293 K have been proposed as $$ {\text{r}} = - {\text{dcUO}}_{ 2} \left( {{\text{NO}}_{ 3} } \right)_{ 2} /{\text{dt}} = 1. 80 \times 10^{ - 3} \left[ {{\text{UO}}_{ 2} \left( {{\text{NO}}_{ 3} } \right)_{ 2} } \right]^{ 1.0 1} \left[ {\text{TiAP}} \right]^{0. 5 5} , $$ $$ {\text{r}} = - {\text{dcTh }}\left( {{\text{NO}}_{ 3} } \right)_{ 4} /{\text{dt}} = 1. 8 8\times 10^{ - 3} \left[ {{\text{Th }}\left( {{\text{NO}}_{ 3} } \right)_{ 4} } \right]^{ 1.0 4} \left[ {\text{TiAP}} \right]^{ 1. 7 7} \left[ {{\text{HNO}}_{ 3} } \right]^{0. 3 8} , $$ respectively.     

Thermal investigations of SmFeTeO6 and SmCrTeO6 compounds

SmFeTeO₆ and SmCrTeO₆ were synthesized by heating the respective oxides in molar quantities and characterized by X-ray technique. Thermogravimetric studies suggested that SmFeTeO₆ and SmCrTeO₆ vapourize incongruently according to the reactions: $$ \begin{aligned} {\text{SmFeTeO}}_{ 6}{({\text{s}})} & \to {\text{SmFeO}}_{ 3} {( {\text{s}})} + {\text{TeO}}_{ 2} {( {\text{g}})} + \left( { 1/ 2} \right){\text{O}}_{ 2}{( {\text{g}})} \\ {\text{SmCrTeO}}_{ 6} {( {\text{s}})} & \to {\text{SmCrO}}_{ 3} {( {\text{s}})} + {\text{TeO}}_{ 2}{( {\text{g}})} + \left( { 1/ 2} \right){\text{O}}_{ 2}{( {\text{g}})}. \\ \end{aligned} $$ X-ray diffraction data of both the compounds have been indexed on the hexagonal system. Partial pressures of TeO₂(g) were measured over SmFeO₃(s) and SmCrO₃(s) by employing the Knudsen effusion mass loss technique. The standard Gibbs free energy of formation of (Δ_f G°) SmFeTeO₆(s) and SmCrTeO₆(s) were obtained from partial pressures and represented by the following relations: $$\Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{\circ} \left( {{\text{SmFeTeO}}_{6}{( {{\text{s}},\,T})}} \right) \pm 2 5\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mol}}^{ - 1} = - 1 5 1. 6 5+ 0. 1 5\left(T \right)\quad \left( 1 ,0 90{-} 1,1 80\,{\text{K}} \right) \\ \Updelta_{\text{f}} G^{\circ } \left( {{\text{SmCrTeO}}_{ 6} {( {{\text{s}},\,T})}} \right) \pm 2 5\,{\text{kJ}}\,{\text{mole}}^{ - 1} = - 2 5 2. 8 6+ 0. 1 2(T)\quad \left( { 1,100 {-} 1 , 1 7 5\,{\text{K}}} \right).$$