Synthese und Struktur der Komplexe [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐RuCl2(C6H6)] und [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)]

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Complexes [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] and [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)] The heteronuclear complex [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] ( 1 ) is obtained by the reaction of [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] with [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)]₂ in C₆H₅CN in form of red crystals with the composition 1 ·C₆H₅CN crystallizing in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a =1149.77(8), b = 3085.9(3), c = 1172.1(1) pm, β = 104.766(9)° and Z = 4. In the dinuclear complex the complex fragment [RuCl₂(C₆H₆)] is connected by an asymmetric nitrido bridge with the nitrido complex [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃]. The nitrido bridge is characterised by a bond angle Re‐N‐Ru of 170.6(3)° and distances Re‐N = 170.2(5) and Ru‐N = 199.0(5) pm. The reaction of [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] with [RhCl(COD)]₂ in benzonitrile yields orange crystals of [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐RhCl(COD)] ( 2 ) with the space group P2₁/c and a = 1522.3(2), b = 1274.85(4), c = 1921.2(2) pm, β = 106.759(7)° and Z = 4. The monovalent Rh atom exhibits a square planar coordination with the two π‐bonds of the cycloocta‐1, 5‐diene occupying cis positions. The distances in the almost linear nitrido bridge (Re‐N‐Rh = 174.8(4)°>) are Re‐N = 172.2(6) pm and Rh‐N = 195.6(6) pm.     

Thiosemicarbazonates of Ruthenium(II): Crystal Structures of [Bis(triphenylphosphine)][bis(N‐phenyl‐pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonato)]ruthenium(II) and [Bis(diphenylphosphino)butane][bis(salicylaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonato)]ruthenium(II)

Reaction of RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ with N‐Phenyl‐pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (C₅H₄N–C²(H)=N³‐N²H–C¹(=S)N¹HC₆H₅, Hpytsc‐NPh) in presence of Et₃N base led to loss of ‐N²H‐proton and yielded the complex [Ru(pytsc‐NPh)₂(Ph₃P)₂] ( 1 ). Similar reactions of precursor RuCl₂[(p‐tolyl)₃P]₃ with a series of thiosemicarbazone ligands, viz. pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hpytsc), salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (H₂stsc), and benzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hbtsc), have yielded the complexes, [Ru(pytsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}₂] ( 2 ), [Ru(Hstsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}]₂ ( 3 ), and [Ru(btsc)₂{(p‐tolyl)₃P}₂] ( 4 ), respectively. The reactions of precursor Ru₂Cl₄(dppb)₃ {dppb = Ph₂P–(CH₂)₄–PPh₂} with H₂stsc, Hbtsc, furan‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Hftsc) and thiophene‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Httsc) have formed complexes of the composition, [Ru(Hstsc)₂(dppb)] ( 5 ), [Ru(btsc)₂(dppb)] ( 6 ), [Ru(ftsc)₂(dppb)] ( 7 ), and [Ru(ttsc)₂(dppb)] ( 8 ). The complexes have been characterized by analytical data, IR, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography ( 1 and 5 ). The proton NMR confirmed loss of –N²H– proton in all the compounds, and ³¹P NMR spectra reveal the presence of equivalent phosphorus atoms in the complexes. In all the compounds, thiosemicarbazone ligands coordinate to the Ru^II atom via hydrazinic nitrogen (N²) and sulfur atoms. The arrangement around each metal atom is distorted octahedral with cis:cis:trans P, P:N, N:S, S dispositions of donor atoms.     

Syntheses and Structures of Homo‐ and Heterobimetallic Complexes Containing a (Cyclopentadienone)rhodium(I) Fragment

The reaction of [RhCl(η⁴‐Ph₂R₂C₄CO)]₂ (R=Ph, 2‐naphthyl) with the dimeric complexes [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ p‐cymene=1‐methyl‐4‐(1‐methylethyl)benzene, [RuCl₂(1,3,5‐Et₃C₆H₃)]₂, [MCl₂(Cp*)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir; Cp*=1,2,3,4,5‐pentamethylcyclopenta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐yl), [RuCl₂(CO)₃]₂, [RuCl₂(dcypb)(CO)]₂ (dcypb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[dicyclohexylphosphine]), [(dppb)ClRu(μ‐Cl)₂(μ‐OH₂)RuCl(dppb)] (dppb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[diphenylphosphine]), and [(dcypb)(N₂)Ru(μ‐Cl)₃RuCl(dcypb)] was investigated. In all cases, mixed, chloro‐bridged complexes were formed in quantitative yield (see 5 – 8, 9 – 16, 18, 19, 21 , and 22 ). The six new complexes 5, 8, 9, 13, 15 , and 22 were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis (Figs. 1–3).     

Synthesis and structures of ruthenium di‐ and tricarbonyl complexes derived from 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one

Carbon monoxide (CO) has recently been shown to impart beneficial effects in mammalian physiology and considerable research attention is now being directed toward metal–carbonyl complexes as a means of delivering CO to biological targets. Two ruthenium carbonyl complexes, namely trans‐dicarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κ²N,N′)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₂], (1), and fac‐tricarbonyldichlorido(4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one‐κN)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(C₁₁H₆N₂O)(CO)₃], (2), have been isolated and structurally characterized. In the case of complex (1), the trans‐directing effect of the CO ligands allows bidentate coordination of the 4,5‐diazafluoren‐9‐one (dafo) ligand despite a larger bite distance between the N‐donor atoms. In complex (2), the cis disposition of two chloride ligands restricts the ability of the dafo molecule to bind ruthenium in a bidentate fashion. Both complexes exhibit well defined ¹H NMR spectra confirming the diamagnetic ground state of Ru^II and display a strong absorption band around 300 nm in the UV.     

Mono‐ and bis‐tolylterpyridine iridium(III) complexes

The first structure report of trichlorido[4′‐(p‐tolyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]iridium(III) dimethyl sulfoxide solvate, [IrCl₃(C₂₂H₁₇N₃)]·C₂H₆OS, (I), is presented, along with a higher‐symmetry setting of previously reported bis[4′‐(p‐tolyl)‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine]iridium(III) tris(hexafluoridophosphate) acetonitrile disolvate, [Ir(C₂₂H₁₇N₃)₂](PF₆)₃·2C₂H₃N, (II) [Yoshikawa, Yamabe, Kanehisa, Kai, Takashima & Tsukahara (2007). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1911–1919]. For (I), the data were collected with synchrotron radiation and the dimethyl sulfoxide solvent molecule is disordered over three positions, one of which is an inversion center. The previously reported structure of (II) is presented in the more appropriate C2/c space group. The iridium complex and one PF₆⁻ anion lie on twofold axes in this structure, making half of the molecule unique.     

Organo‐Palladium(II)‐Verbindungen mit PdC4‐Koordination: Phenylethinyl‐ und Methylphenylethinylkomplexe

Tetrakis(p‐tolyl)oxalamidinato‐bis[acetylacetonatopalladium(II)] ([Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)]) reacted with Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ in THF with formation of [Pd(C≡C–C₆H₅)₄Li₂(thf)₄] ( 1a ). Reaction of [Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)] with a mixture of 6 equiv. Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ and 2 equiv. LiCH₃ resulted in the formation of [Pd(CH₃)(C≡C–C₆H₅)₃Li₂(thf)₄] ( 2 ), and the dimeric complex [Pd₂(CH₃)₄(C≡C–C₆H₅)₄Li₄(thf)₆] ( 3 ) was isolated upon reaction of [Pd₂(acac)₂(oxam)] with a mixture of 4 equiv. Li–C≡C–C₆H₅ and 4 equiv. LiCH₃. 1 – 3 are extremely reactive compounds, which were isolated as white needles in good yields (60–90%). They were fully characterized by IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, ⁷Li‐NMR spectroscopy, and by X‐ray crystallography of single crystals. In these compounds Li ions are bonded to the two carbon atoms of the alkinyl ligand. 1a reacted with Pd(PPh₃)₄ in the presence of oxygen to form the already known complexes trans‐[Pd(C≡C–C₆H₅)₂(PPh₃)₂] and [Pd(η²‐O₂)(PPh₃)₂]. In addition, 1a is an active catalyst for the Heck coupling reaction, but less active in the catalytic Sonogashira reaction.     

Synthese und Eigenschaften von Metallocen‐ und Halbsandwich‐Komplexen mit pyridinhaltigen Brücken bzw. Seitenketten

Synthesis and Properties of Metallocene and Half Sandwich Complexes with Pyridine‐containing Bridges or Side Chains 2,6‐Bis(chlormethyl)pyridine ( 1 ) reacts with 4 equivalents of indenyllithium with formation of 2,6bis(methylenindenyl)pyridine‐dilitihium ( 2 ) from which with MCl₄ · 2 thf (M = Zr, Hf) the corresponding metallocene dichlorides 3 and 4 can be obtained. At reaction of 1 with 2 equivalents of C₅H₅Na only one Cl atom is replaced by a C₅H₅Na unit. Following reactions with indenyl lithium and ZrCl₄ · 2 thf give the unsymmetric complex [C₅H₃N–2,6‐CH₂‐(2‐C₅H₄)–(6‐C₉H₆)ZrCl₂] ( 7 ). – Picolylcyclopentadiene ( 8 ) and 1‐(picolyl)‐indene ( 9 ) are synthesized from 2‐chlomethyl‐pyridinium chloride and C₅H₅Na or indenyl lithium respectively, which are transferred in the half sandwich complexes (C₅H₄N–CH₂C₅H₄)MCl₃ (M = Ti 10 , Zr 11 ) and (C₅H₄–CH₂C₉H₆)ZrCl₃ ( 12) . The compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H n.m.r., ms, ir, and raman spectra. N → M interactions are discussed.     

1,3,5‐Tri‐p‐tolyl­biuret

MoOCl₂(L_OMe) as catalyst, where L_OMe is CpCo[P(O)(OMe)₂]₃, reacts with p‐tolyl isocyanate to afford the title compound, C₂₃H₂₃N₃O₂. The structural features are the intramolecular hydrogen bond forming a six‐membered ring and a nearly planar arrangement of the biuret moiety. Each p‐tolyl phenyl ring is twisted by approximately 60–80° with respect to the others. The bond lengths N1—C22 of 1.357 (3) Å and N2—C23 of 1.333 (3) Å indicate that they are partial double bonds.     

Isocyanate‐ and Isothiocyanate‐Derived RuIV‐Based Alkylidenes: Synthesis,Structure, and Activity

The synthesis and characterization of a series of isocyanate‐ and isothiocyanate‐derived second generation Grubbs–Hoveyda‐type ruthenium–alkylidene complexes, that is, [Ru(N?C?O)₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 1 ), [Ru(N?C?O)₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(=CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 2 ), [Ru(N?C?S)₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 3 ), and [Ru(N?C?S)₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 4 ), and their activity in various metathesis reactions are described. Compounds 1 – 4 were prepared by reaction of the parent complexes [RuCl₂(IMesH₂)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)C₆H₄)] ( 5 ) (IMesH₂=1,3‐bis‐(2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydroimidazol‐2‐ylidene) and [RuCl₂(1,3‐dimesityl‐3,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐2‐ylidene)(?CH‐2‐(2‐PrO)‐C₆H₄)] ( 6 ) with silver cyanate and thiocyanate, respectively. The X‐ray structure of 1 was determined, confirming the isocyanate‐type bonding of the ligand. The isothiocyanate‐type bonding in 3 and 4 was unambiguously confirmed by IR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The isocyanate‐derived complexes 1 and 2 were found to be excellent catalysts for the ring‐opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of cis‐cycloocta‐1,5‐diene (COD). Both 1 and 2 yielded poly(COD) with a trans‐content of about 80 %. First‐order kinetics with unprecedentedly high rate constants of polymerization (k_p=0.068 and 0.26 s^?1, respectively) were observed. Compounds 3 and 4 were also active initiators for the ROMP of COD, however, they generated poly(COD) with a cis‐content of 80 and 67 %, respectively. Complexes 1 and 2 also showed good catalytic activity in cross‐metathesis (CM) reactions. Finally, 1 – 4 were also found to be excellent catalysts for the regioselective cyclopolymerization of diethyl 2,2‐dipropargylmalonate (DEDPM), resulting in poly(DEDPM) almost entirely based on five‐membered repeat units, that is, cyclopent‐1‐ene‐1,2‐vinylenes.     

Pentaazadienido-Komplexe von Zink,Cadmium und Quecksilber Die Kristallstruktur von [Cd(EtOC6H4-N5-C6H4OEt)2(py)2] und [Hg(tol-N5-tol)2(py)]

Pentaazadienido Complexes of Zinc, Cadmium, and Mercury. The Crystal Structure of [Cd(EtOC₆H₄-N₅-C₆H₄OEt)₂(py)₂] and [Hg(tol-N₅-tol)₂(py)] The pentaazadienido complexes [M(EtOC₆H₄N₅C₆H₄OEt)₂] (M = Zn ( 1 ), Cd ( 2 )) are formed by the reaction of [M(NH₃)₄]²⁺ with [EtOC₆H₄N₅C₆H₄OEt]^? in aqueous ammonia. 2 crystallizes from pyridine as [Cd(EtOC₆H₄N₅C₆H₄OEt)₂py₂] ( 3 ) with the triclinic space group P1 and a = 937.2(2); b = 1422.7(2); c = 2085.5(2) pm; α = 75.28(1)°; β = 94.74(1)°; γ = 99.75(1)°; Z = 2. The central Cd²⁺ ion of 3 exhibits an octahedral coordination by two pyridine ligands in cis arrangement and two (N1, N3)-²⁺ chelating pentaazadienide ions. The reaction of [HgI₄]² with the 1,5-di(tolyl)pentaazadienide anion in aqueous ammonia affords [Hg(p-tol-N₅-tol)₂] ( 4 ), which crystallizes from pyridine in form of [Hg(tol-N₅-tol)₂py] ( 5 ) with the space group P1 and a = 1176.2(4); b = 1203.1(3); c = 1295.6(5) pm; α = 100.77(3)°; β = 110.08(3)°; γ = 94.29(2)°; Z = 2. In 5 the Hg²⁺ cation is threefold coordinated by two monodentate (N3)-η¹ pentaazadienid anions and one pyridine ligand. Within the N₅ chains of the pentaazadienid anions of 3 and 5 localized N? N double bonds are found in the positions N1? N2 and N4? N5 with distances between 125 and 129 pm.     

Syntheses,Spectroscopic, Electrochemical,and Third‐Order Nonlinear Optical Studies of a Hybrid Tris{ruthenium(alkynyl)/(2‐phenylpyridine)}iridium Complex

The synthesis of fac‐[Ir{N,C₁′‐(2,2′‐NC₅H₄C₆H₃‐5′‐C?C‐1‐C₆H₂‐3,5‐Et₂‐4‐C?CC₆H₄‐4‐C?CH)}₃] ( 10 ), which bears pendant ethynyl groups, and its reaction with [RuCl(dppe)₂]PF₆ to afford the heterobimetallic complex fac‐[Ir{N,C₁′‐(2,2′‐NC₅H₄C₆H₃‐5′‐C?C‐1‐C₆H₂‐3,5‐Et₂‐4‐C?CC₆H₄‐4‐C?C‐trans‐[RuCl(dppe)₂])}₃] ( 11 ) is described. Complex 10 is available from the two‐step formation of iodo‐functionalized fac‐tris[2‐(4‐iodophenyl)pyridine]iridium(III) ( 6 ), followed by ligand‐centered palladium‐catalyzed coupling and desilylation reactions. Structural studies of tetrakis[2‐(4‐iodophenyl)pyridine‐N,C₁′](μ‐dichloro)diiridium 5 , 6 , fac‐[Ir{N,C₁′‐(2,2′‐NC₅H₄C₆H₃‐5′‐C?C‐1‐C₆H₂‐3,5‐Et₂‐4‐C?CH)}₃] ( 8 ), and 10 confirm ligand‐centered derivatization of the tris(2‐phenylpyridine)iridium unit. Electrochemical studies reveal two ( 5 ) or one ( 6 – 10 ) Ir‐centered oxidations for which the potential is sensitive to functionalization at the phenylpyridine groups but relatively insensitive to more remote derivatization. Compound 11 undergoes sequential Ru‐centered and Ir‐centered oxidation, with the potential of the latter significantly more positive than that of Ir(N,C′‐NC₅H₄‐2‐C₆H₄‐2)₃. Ligand‐centered π–π* transitions characteristic of the Ir(N,C′‐NC₅H₄‐2‐C₆H₄‐2)₃ unit red‐shift and gain in intensity following the iodo and alkynyl incorporation. Spectroelectrochemical studies of 6 , 7 , 9 , and 11 reveal the appearance in each case of new low‐energy LMCT bands following formal Ir^III/IV oxidation preceded, in the case of 11 , by the appearance of a low‐energy LMCT band associated with the formal Ru^II/III oxidation process. Emission maxima of 6 – 10 reveal a red‐shift upon alkynyl group introduction and arylalkynyl π‐system lengthening; this process is quenched upon incorporation of the ligated ruthenium moiety on proceeding to 11 . Third‐order nonlinear optical studies of 11 were undertaken at the benchmark wavelengths of 800 nm (fs pulses) and 532 nm (ns pulses), the results from the former suggesting a dominant contribution from two‐photon absorption, and results from the latter being consistent with primarily excited‐state absorption.     

Experimental and Computational Studies on the Reactivity of a Terminal Thorium Imidometallocene towards Organic Azides and Diazoalkanes

The reaction of the base‐free terminal thorium imido complex [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th?N(p‐tolyl)] ( 1 ) with p‐azidotoluene yielded irreversibly the tetraazametallacyclopentene [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th{N(p‐tolyl)N?N? N(p‐tolyl)}] ( 2 ), whereas the bridging imido complex [{[η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂]Th(N₃)₂}₂{μ‐N(p‐tolyl)}₂][(n‐C₄H₉)₄N]₂ ( 3 ) was isolated from the reaction of 1 with [(n‐C₄H₉)₄N]N₃. Unexpectedly, upon the treatment of 1 with 9‐diazofluorene, the NN bond was cleaved, an N atom was transferred, and the η²‐diazenido iminato complex [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th{η²‐[N?N(p‐tolyl)]}{N?(9‐C₁₃H₈)}] ( 4 ) was formed. In contrast, the reaction of 1 with Me₃SiCHN₂ gave the nitrilimido complex [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}₂Th{NH(p‐tolyl)}{N₂CSiMe₃}] ( 5 ), which slowly converted into [{η⁵‐1,2,4‐(Me₃C)₃C₅H₂}{η⁵:κ‐N‐1,2‐(Me₃C)₂‐4‐CMe₂(CH₂NN?CHSiMe₃)C₅H₂}Th{NH(p‐tolyl)}] ( 6 ) by intramolecular C? H bond activation. The experimental results are complemented by density functional theory (DFT) studies.     

A ruthenium(II) complex with p‐cymene and (S)‐2‐(anilinomethyl)pyrrolidine

The title compound, [(S)‐2‐(anilino­methyl)­pyrrolidine‐N,N′]‐chloro(η⁶‐para‐cymene)­ruthenium(II) chloride, [RuCl‐(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₁₁H₁₆N₂)]Cl, has been synthesized by the reaction of [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ (p‐cymene is para‐iso­propyl­toluene) with (S)‐2‐(anilinomethyl)­pyrrolidine in triethyl­amine/2‐propanol. The Ru atom is in a pseudo‐tetrahedral environment coordinated by a chloride ligand, the aromatic hydro­carbon is linked in a η⁶ manner and the amine is linked via its two N atoms. The chloride anion is involved in hydrogen bonding with the di­amine moieties through N—H?Cl interactions, with N?Cl distances of 3.273 (4) and 3.352 (4) Å.     

Novel P‐Stereogenic PCP Pincer‐Aryl Ruthenium(II) Complexes and Their Use in the Asymmetric Hydrogen Transfer Reaction of Acetophenone

Achiral P‐donor pincer‐aryl ruthenium complexes ([RuCl(PCP)(PPh₃)]) 4c , d were synthesized via transcyclometalation reactions by mixing equivalent amounts of [1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[diisopropylphosphine] ( 2c ) or [1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[diphenylphosphine] ( 2d ) and the N‐donor pincer‐aryl complex [RuCl{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}(PPh₃)], ( 3 ; Scheme 2). The same synthetic procedure was successfully applied for the preparation of novel chiral P‐donor pincer‐aryl ruthenium complexes [RuCl(P*CP*)(PPh₃)] 4a , b by reacting P‐stereogenic pincer‐arenes (S,S)‐[1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[(alkyl)(phenyl)phosphines] 2a , b (alkyl=ⁱPr or ^tBu, P*CHP*) and the complex [RuCl{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}(PPh₃)], ( 3 ; Scheme 3). The crystal structures of achiral [RuCl(equation/tex2gif-sup-3.gifPCP)(PPh₃)] 4c and of chiral (S,S)‐[RuCl(equation/tex2gif-sup-6.gifPCP)(PPh₃)] 4a were determined by X‐ray diffraction (Fig. 3). Achiral [RuCl(PCP)(PPh₃)] complexes and chiral [RuCl(P*CP*)(PPh₃)] complexes were tested as catalyst in the H‐transfer reduction of acetophenone with propan‐2‐ol. With the chiral complexes, a modest enantioselectivity was obtained.     

Synthesis and Reactivity of Boron‐, Silicon‐, and Tin‐Bridged ansa‐Cyclopentadienyl–Cycloheptatrienyl Titanium Complexes (Troticenophanes)

A novel one‐pot method was developed for the preparation of [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(η⁷‐C₇H₇)] (troticene, 1 ) by reaction of sodium cyclopentadienide (NaCp) with [TiCl₄(thf)₂], followed by reduction of the intermediate [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂TiCl₂] with magnesium in the presence of cycloheptatriene (C₇H₈). The [n]troticenophanes 3 (n=1), 4 , 8 , 10 (n=2), and 11 (n=3) were synthesized by salt elimination reactions between dilithiated troticene, [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₄Li)(η⁷‐C₇H₆Li)] ? pmdta ( 2 ) (pmdta=N,N′,N′,N′′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine), and the appropriate organoelement dichlorides Cl₂Sn(Mes)₂ (Mes=2,4,6‐trimethylphenyl), Cl₂Sn₂(tBu)₄, Cl₂B₂(NMe₂)₂, Cl₂Si₂Me₄, and (ClSiMe₂)₂CH₂, respectively. Their structural characterization was carried out by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. The stanna[1]‐ and stanna[2]troticenophanes 3 and 4 represent the first heteroleptic sandwich complexes bearing Sn atoms in the ansa bridge. The reaction of 3 with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] resulted in regioselective insertion of the [Pt(PEt₃)₂] fragment into the Sn? C_ipso bond between the tin atom and the seven‐membered ring, which afforded the platinastanna[2]troticenophane 5 . Oxidative addition was also observed upon treatment of 4 with elemental sulfur or selenium, to produce the [3]troticenophanes [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₄SntBu₂)(η⁷‐C₇H₆SntBu₂)E] ( 6 : E=S; 7 : E=Se). The B? B bond of the bora[2]troticenophane 8 was readily cleaved by reaction with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] to form the corresponding oxidative addition product [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₄BNMe₂)(η⁷‐C₇H₆BNMe₂)Pt(PEt₃)₂] ( 9 ). The solid‐state structures of compounds 5 , 6 , and 9 were also determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Luminescent Amphiphilic 2,6‐Bis(1‐alkylpyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridyl Platinum(II) Complexes: Synthesis,Characterization, Electrochemical,Photophysical, and Langmuir–Blodgett Film Formation Studies

Two series of novel platinum(II) 2,6‐bis(1‐alkylpyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridyl (N5Cn) complexes, [Pt(N5Cn)Cl][X] ( 1 – 9 ) and [Pt(N5Cn)(C?CR)][X] ( 10 – 13 ) (X=trifluoromethanesulfonate (OTf) or PF₆; R=C₆H₅, C₆H₄‐p‐CF₃ and C₆H₄‐p‐N(C₆H₅)₂), with various chain lengths of the alkyl groups on the nitrogen atom of the pyrazolyl units have been successfully synthesized and characterized. Their electrochemical and photophysical properties have been studied. Some of their molecular structures have also been determined by X‐ray crystallography. Two amphiphilic platinum(II) 2,6‐bis(1‐tetradecylpyrazol‐3‐yl)pyridyl (N5C14) complexes, [Pt(N5C14)Cl]PF₆ ( 7 ) and [Pt(N5C14)(C?CC₆H₅)]PF₆ ( 13 ), were found to form stable and reproducible Langmuir–Blodgett (LB) films at the air–water interface. The characterization of such LB films has been investigated by the study of their surface pressure–area (π–A) isotherms, UV/Vis spectroscopy, XRD, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), FTIR, and polarized IR spectroscopy. The luminescence property of 13 in LB films has also been studied.     

Crystallographic report: [N,N′‐Bis‐(6‐methylpyrid‐2‐ylium)‐(1R,2R)‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane] bis‐[(p‐cymene)‐ trichlororuthenate(II)]

The chiral compound (H₂cydiampy)[RuCl₃(p‐cymene)]₂ has been obtained in high yield by treating [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ with an excess of hydrochloric acid in the presence of one equivalent of N,N′‐bis‐(6‐methylpyrid‐2‐yl)‐(1R,2R)‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane (cydiampy). It crystallizes in the chiral tetragonal space group P4₃2₁2, with half of the atoms of the dication related to the other half by a crystallographic C₂ axis that also makes equivalent the two anionic metal moieties. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Ansa‐Complexes of [Mn(η5‐C5H5)(η6‐C6H6)]: Preparation,Characterization, and Reactivity of [n]Manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2, 3)

We report the synthesis of [n]manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2) featuring boron, silicon, germanium, and tin as ansa‐bridging elements. Their preparation was achieved by salt‐elimination reactions of the dilithiated precursor [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄Li)(η⁶‐C₆H₅Li)]?pmdta (pmdta=N,N,N′,N′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) with corresponding element dichlorides. Besides characterization by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, the identity of two single‐atom‐bridged derivatives, [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] and [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SiPh₂], could also be determined by X‐ray structural analysis. We investigated for the first time the reactivity of these ansa‐cyclopentadienyl–benzene manganese compounds. The reaction of the distannyl‐bridged complex [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)Sn₂tBu₄] with elemental sulfur was shown to proceed through the expected oxidative addition of the Sn?Sn bond to give a triatomic ansa‐bridge. The investigation of the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) capability of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] showed that an unexpected, unselective insertion into the C_ipso?Sn bonds of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] had occurred.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Synthese,Struktur und Eigenschaften der Komplexe [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐IrCl2(C5Me5)], [(Me2PhP)3Cl2Re≡N‐IrCl(COD)], [PPh4][O3Os≡N‐IrCl2(C5Me5)] und [PPh4][O3Os≡N‐IrCl(COD)] mit Nitridobrücken Re≡N‐Ir und Os≡N‐Ir

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of the Complexes [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐IrCl₂(C₅Me₅)], [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐IrCl(COD)], [PPh₄][O₃Os≡N‐IrCl₂(C₅Me₅)], and [PPh₄][O₃Os≡N‐IrCl(COD)] with Nitrido bridges Re≡N‐Ir and Os≡N‐Ir The heteronuclear complexes [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐IrCl₂(C₅Me₅)] ( 1 ), [(Me₂PhP)₃Cl₂Re≡N‐IrCl(COD)] ( 2 ), [PPh₄][O₃Os≡N‐IrCl₂(C₅Me₅)] ( 3 ) and [PPh₄][O₃Os≡N‐IrCl(COD)] ( 4 ) were obtained by the reaction of the nitrido complexes [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃] and [OsO₃N]^— with the iridium compounds [IrCl₂(C₅Me₅)]₂ and [IrCl(COD)]₂ in benzonitrile. 1 forms red crystals with the composition 1 ·C₆H₅CN in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c and a = 1264.7(2); b = 1945.3(2); c = 1835.4(1) pm, β = 90.35(1)°, Z = 4. The complex fragment [IrCl₂(C₅Me₅)] in the dinuclear complex is connected by an asymmetric nitrido bridge Re≡N‐Ir to the nitrido complex [ReNCl₂(PMe₂Ph)₃]. The nitrido bridge is characterized by a Re‐N‐Ir bond angle of 179.4(2)° and distances Re‐N = 170.9(4) pm and Ir‐N = 203.3(4) pm. 2 forms brownish red, triclinic crystals with the space group P1¯ and a = 1076.6(2), b = 1373.2(2), c = 1452.4(1) pm, α = 107.513(8), β = 101.843(9), γ = 110.04(1)°, Z = 2. The nitrido bridge to the complex fragment [IrCl(COD)] has a Re‐N‐Ir bond angle of 173, 8(4)° and distances Re‐N = 170, 4(8) pm and Ir‐N = 196, 2(8) pm. 3 crystallizes as monoclinic red crystals in the space group P2₁/n and a = 1449.9(2), b = 906.74(4), c = 2628.9(5) pm, β = 103.50(1)°, Z = 4. The nitrido bridge Os≡N‐Ir is slightly bent (Os‐N‐Ir = 165.0(3)°). The distances are Os‐N = 168.3(5) pm and Ir‐N = 201.9(5) pm. 4 forms dark brown, orthorhombic crystals with the space group P2₁2₁2₁ and a = 704.35(2), b = 1228.17(6), c = 3442.0(4) pm, Z = 4. The distances in the slightly bent nitrido bridge (Os‐N‐Ir = 161.8(4)°) are Os‐N = 169.3(7) pm und Ir‐N = 197.8(7) pm.