Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening

Structure Based Drug Design (SBDD) is a computational approach to lead discovery that uses the three-dimensional structure of a protein to fit drug-like molecules into a ligand binding site to modulate function. Identifying the location of the binding site is therefore a vital first step in this process, restricting the search space for SBDD or virtual screening studies. The detection and characterisation of functional sites on proteins has increasingly become an area of interest. Structural genomics projects are increasingly yielding protein structures with unknown functions and binding sites. Binding site prediction was pioneered by pocket detection, since the binding site is often found in the largest pocket. More recent methods involve phylogenetic analysis, identifying structural similarity with proteins of known function and identifying regions on the protein surface with a potential for high binding affinity. Binding site prediction has been used in several SBDD projects and has been incorporated into several docking tools. We discuss different methods of ligand binding site prediction, their strengths and weaknesses, and how they have been used in SBDD.     

Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application

Benchmarks for molecular docking have historically focused on re-docking the cognate ligand of a well-determined protein-ligand complex to measure geometric pose prediction accuracy, and measurement of virtual screening performance has been focused on increasingly large and diverse sets of target protein structures, cognate ligands, and various types of decoy sets. Here, pose prediction is reported on the Astex Diverse set of 85 protein ligand complexes, and virtual screening performance is reported on the DUD set of 40 protein targets. In both cases, prepared structures of targets and ligands were provided by symposium organizers. The re-prepared data sets yielded results not significantly different than previous reports of Surflex-Dock on the two benchmarks. Minor changes to protein coordinates resulting from complex pre-optimization had large effects on observed performance, highlighting the limitations of cognate ligand re-docking for pose prediction assessment. Docking protocols developed for cross-docking, which address protein flexibility and produce discrete families of predicted poses, produced substantially better performance for pose prediction. Performance on virtual screening performance was shown to benefit by employing and combining multiple screening methods: docking, 2D molecular similarity, and 3D molecular similarity. In addition, use of multiple protein conformations significantly improved screening enrichment.     

GalaxyDock2: Protein–ligand docking using beta‐complex and global optimization

In this article, an enhanced version of GalaxyDock protein–ligand docking program is introduced. GalaxyDock performs conformational space annealing (CSA) global optimization to find the optimal binding pose of a ligand both in the rigid‐receptor mode and the flexible‐receptor mode. Binding pose prediction has been improved compared to the earlier version by the efficient generation of high‐quality initial conformations for CSA using a predocking method based on a beta‐complex derived from the Voronoi diagram of receptor atoms. Binding affinity prediction has also been enhanced by using the optimal combination of energy components, while taking into consideration the energy of the unbound ligand state. The new version has been tested in terms of binding mode prediction, binding affinity prediction, and virtual screening on several benchmark sets, showing improved performance over the previous version and AutoDock, on which the GalaxyDock energy function is based. GalaxyDock2 also performs better than or comparable to other state‐of‐the‐art docking programs. GalaxyDock2 is freely available at http://galaxy.seoklab.org/softwares/galaxydock.html . © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy

Performance of small molecule automated docking programs has conceptually been divided into docking -, scoring -, ranking - and screening power, which focuses on the crystal pose prediction, affinity prediction, ligand ranking and database screening capabilities of the docking program, respectively. Benchmarks show that different docking programs can excel in individual benchmarks which suggests that the scoring function employed by the programs can be optimized for a particular task. Here the scoring function of Smina is re-optimized towards enhancing the docking power using a supervised machine learning approach and a manually curated database of ligands and cross docking receptor pairs. The optimization method does not need associated binding data for the receptor-ligand examples used in the data set and works with small train sets. The re-optimization of the weights for the scoring function results in a similar docking performance with regard to docking power towards a cross docking test set. A ligand decoy based benchmark indicates a better discrimination between poses with high and low RMSD. The reported parameters for Smina are compatible with Autodock Vina and represent ready-to-use alternative parameters for researchers who aim at pose prediction rather than affinity prediction.     

Molecular modeling study of checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors by multiple docking strategies and prime/MM-GBSA calculation

Developing chemicals that inhibit checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is a promising adjuvant therapeutic to improve the efficacy and selectivity of DNA-targeting agents. Reliable prediction of binding-free energy and binding affinity of Chk1 inhibitors can provide a guide for rational drug design. In this study, multiple docking strategies and Prime/Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area (Prime/MM-GBSA) calculation were applied to predict the binding mode and free energy for a series of benzoisoquinolinones as Chk1 inhibitors. Reliable docking results were obtained using induced-fit docking and quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) docking, which showed superior performance on both ligand binding pose and docking score accuracy to the rigid-receptor docking. Then, the Prime/MM-GBSA method based on the docking complex was used to predict the binding-free energy. The combined use of QM/MM docking and Prime/MM-GBSA method could give a high correlation between the predicted binding-free energy and experimentally determined pIC(50) . The molecular docking combined with Prime/MM-GBSA simulation can not only be used to rapidly and accurately predict the binding-free energy of novel Chk1 inhibitors but also provide a novel strategy for lead discovery and optimization targeting Chk1.     

Could the presence of sodium ion influence the accuracy and precision of the ligand-posing in the human A<Subscript>2A</Subscript> adenosine receptor orthosteric binding site using a molecular docking approach? Insights from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Dockbench</Emphasis>

The allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by sodium ions has received considerable attention as crystal structures of several receptors, in their inactive conformation, show a Na⁺ ion bound to specific residues which, in the human A_2A adenosine receptor (hA_2A AR), are Ser91^3.39, Trp246^6.48, Asn280^7.45, and Asn284^7.49. A cluster of water molecules completes the coordination of the sodium ion in the putative allosteric site. It is absolutely consolidated that the progress made in the field of GPCRs structural determination has increased the adoption of docking-driven approaches for the identification or the optimization of novel potent and selective ligands. Despite the extensive use of docking protocols in virtual screening approaches, to date, almost any of these studies have been carried out without taking into account the presence of the sodium cation and its first solvation shell in the putative allosteric binding site. In this study, we have focused our attention on determining how the presence of sodium ion binding and additionally its first hydration sphere, in hA_2AAR could influence the ligand positioning accuracy during molecular docking simulations for most of the available resting and activated hA_2A AR crystal structures, using DockBench as a comparative benchmarking tool and implementing a new correlation coefficient (EM). This work provides indications on the evidence that the posing performance (accuracy and/or precision) of the docking protocols in reproducing the crystallographic poses of different hA_2A AR antagonists is generally increased in the presence of the sodium cation and its first solvation shell, in agreement with experimental observations. Consequently, the inclusion of sodium ion and its first solvation shell should be considered in order to facilitate the selection of new potential ligands in all molecular docking-based virtual screening protocols that aim to find novel GPCRs antagonists and inverse agonists.     

POEM: Parameter Optimization using Ensemble Methods: application to target specific scoring functions

In computational biology processes such as docking, binding, and folding are often described by simplified, empirical models. These models are fitted to physical properties of the process by adjustable parameters. An appropriate choice of these parameters is crucial for the quality of the models. Locating the best choices for the parameters is often is a difficult task, depending on the complexity of the model. We describe a new method and program, POEM (Parameter Optimization using Ensemble Methods), for this task. In POEM we combine the DOE (Design Of Experiment) procedure with ensembles of different regression methods. We apply the method to the optimization of target specific scoring functions in molecular docking. The method consists of an iterative procedure that uses alternate evaluation and prediction steps. During each cycle of optimization we fit an approximate function to a defined loss function landscape and improve the quality of this fit from cycle to cycle by constantly augmenting our data set. As test applications we fitted the FlexX and Screenscore scoring functions to the kinase and ATPase protein classes. The results are promising: Starting from random parameters we are able to locate parameter sets which show superior performance compared to the original values. The POEM approach converges quickly and the approximated loss function landscapes are smooth, thus making the approach a suitable method for optimizations on rugged landscapes.     

Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction

The prediction of the binding free energy between a ligand and a protein is an important component in the virtual screening and lead optimization of ligands for drug discovery. To determine the quality of current binding free energy estimation programs, we examined FlexX, X-Score, AutoDock, and BLEEP for their performance in binding free energy prediction in various situations including cocrystallized complex structures, cross docking of ligands to their non-cocrystallized receptors, docking of thermally unfolded receptor decoys to their ligands, and complex structures with "randomized" ligand decoys. In no case was there a satisfactory correlation between the experimental and estimated binding free energies over all the datasets tested. Meanwhile, a strong correlation between ligand molecular weight-binding affinity correlation and experimental predicted binding affinity correlation was found. Sometimes the programs also correctly ranked ligands' binding affinities even though native interactions between the ligands and their receptors were essentially lost because of receptor deformation or ligand randomization, and the programs could not decisively discriminate randomized ligand decoys from their native ligands; this suggested that the tested programs miss important components for the accurate capture of specific ligand binding interactions.     

Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016

We describe the performance of multiple pose prediction methods for the D3R 2016 Grand Challenge. The pose prediction challenge includes 36 ligands, which represent 4 chemotypes and some miscellaneous structures against the FXR ligand binding domain. In this study we use a mix of fully automated methods as well as human-guided methods with considerations of both the challenge data and publicly available data. The methods include ensemble docking, colony entropy pose prediction, target selection by molecular similarity, molecular dynamics guided pose refinement, and pose selection by visual inspection. We evaluated the success of our predictions by method, chemotype, and relevance of publicly available data. For the overall data set, ensemble docking, visual inspection, and molecular dynamics guided pose prediction performed the best with overall mean RMSDs of 2.4, 2.2, and 2.2 Å respectively. For several individual challenge molecules, the best performing method is evaluated in light of that particular ligand. We also describe the protein, ligand, and public information data preparations that are typical of our binding mode prediction workflow.     

Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking

In molecular docking, it is challenging to develop a scoring function that is accurate to conduct high-throughput screenings. Most scoring functions implemented in popular docking software packages were developed with many approximations for computational efficiency, which sacrifices the accuracy of prediction. With advanced technology and powerful computational hardware nowadays, it is feasible to use rigorous scoring functions, such as molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) in molecular docking studies. Here, we systematically investigated the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA to identify the correct binding conformations and predict the binding free energies for 98 protein-ligand complexes. Comparison studies showed that MM/GBSA (69.4%) outperformed MM/PBSA (45.5%) and many popular scoring functions to identify the correct binding conformations. Moreover, we found that molecular dynamics simulations are necessary for some systems to identify the correct binding conformations. Based on our results, we proposed the guideline for MM/GBSA to predict the binding conformations. We then tested the performance of MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA to reproduce the binding free energies of the 98 protein-ligand complexes. The best prediction of MM/GBSA model with internal dielectric constant 2.0, produced a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.66, which is better than MM/PBSA (0.49) and almost all scoring functions used in molecular docking. In summary, MM/GBSA performs well for both binding pose predictions and binding free-energy estimations and is efficient to re-score the top-hit poses produced by other less-accurate scoring functions.     

SAMPL4 & DOCK3.7: lessons for automated docking procedures

The SAMPL4 challenges were used to test current automated methods for solvation energy, virtual screening, pose and affinity prediction of the molecular docking pipeline DOCK 3.7. Additionally, first-order models of binding affinity were proposed as milestones for any method predicting binding affinity. Several important discoveries about the molecular docking software were made during the challenge: (1) Solvation energies of ligands were five-fold worse than any other method used in SAMPL4, including methods that were similarly fast, (2) HIV Integrase is a challenging target, but automated docking on the correct allosteric site performed well in terms of virtual screening and pose prediction (compared to other methods) but affinity prediction, as expected, was very poor, (3) Molecular docking grid sizes can be very important, serious errors were discovered with default settings that have been adjusted for all future work. Overall, lessons from SAMPL4 suggest many changes to molecular docking tools, not just DOCK 3.7, that could improve the state of the art. Future difficulties and projects will be discussed.     

A QXP-based multistep docking procedure for accurate prediction of protein-ligand complexes

The two great challenges of the docking process are the prediction of ligand poses in a protein binding site and the scoring of the docked poses. Ligands that are composed of extended chains in their molecular structure display the most difficulties, predominantly because of the torsional flexibility. On the basis of the molecular docking program QXP-Flo+0802, we have developed a procedure particularly for ligands with a high degree of rotational freedom that allows the accurate prediction of the orientation and conformation of ligands in protein binding sites. Starting from an initial full Monte Carlo docking experiment, this was achieved by performing a series of successive multistep docking runs using a local Monte Carlo search with a restricted rotational angle, by which the conformational search space is limited. The method was established by using a highly flexible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and has been applied to a number of challenging protein-ligand complexes known from the literature.     

Improving molecular docking through eHiTS’ tunable scoring function

We present three complementary approaches for score-tuning that improve docking performance in pose prediction, virtual screening and binding affinity assessment. The methodology utilizes experimental data to customize the scoring function for the system of interest considering the specific docking scenario. The tuning approach, which has been implemented as an automated utility in eHiTS, is introduced as a solution to one of the conundrums of the molecular docking paradigm, namely, the lack of a universally well performing scoring function. The accuracy of scoring functions has been shown to be generally system-dependent, and particularly lacking for binding energy and bio-activity predictions. In the proposed approach, pose and energy predictions are enhanced by adjusting the relative weights of the eHiTS energy terms to improve score-RMSD or score-affinity correlations. In a virtual screening context ligand-based similarity is used to rescale the docking score such that better enrichment factors are achieved. We discuss the algorithmic details of the methods, and demonstrate the effects of score tuning on a variety of targets, including CDK2, BACE1 and neuraminidase, as well as on the popular benchmarks—the Directory of Useful Decoys and the PDBBind database.     

蛋白质-RNA相互作用界面预测与设计

蛋白质-RNA之间的相互作用是蛋白质在细胞里面行使功能的重要方式之一. 结构生物学家利用实验手段可以得到蛋白质-RNA复合物的三维结构, 通过原子水平的晶体结构来解释蛋白质与RNA的识别过程. 但实验取得蛋白质-RNA的复合物结构非常困难, 耗钱、耗时, 同时受限于其相互作用强度. 因而利用理论的方法对蛋白质-RNA相互作用界面进行预测与设计在生物医学研究中十分重要. 本文主要综述了近期蛋白质-RNA相互作用界面预测与设计方面的进展, 包括以下几个方面: (1) 蛋白质-RNA分子对接算法以及对接前后存在的构象变化的处理; (2) 蛋白质-RNA 识别机制的研究; (3) 基于蛋白质-RNA 相互作用界面的分子设计. 蛋白质-RNA分子对接算法逐步完善将有助于我们对大量未知功能的蛋白质与RNA进行功能注释, 而基于生物大分子相互作用界面的分子设计将在药物设计领域中有广阔的应用前景.     

Combining self- and cross-docking as benchmark tools: the performance of DockBench in the D3R Grand Challenge 2

Molecular docking is a powerful tool in the field of computer-aided molecular design. In particular, it is the technique of choice for the prediction of a ligand pose within its target binding site. A multitude of docking methods is available nowadays, whose performance may vary depending on the data set. Therefore, some non-trivial choices should be made before starting a docking simulation. In the same framework, the selection of the target structure to use could be challenging, since the number of available experimental structures is increasing. Both issues have been explored within this work. The pose prediction of a pool of 36 compounds provided by D3R Grand Challenge 2 organizers was preceded by a pipeline to choose the best protein/docking-method couple for each blind ligand. An integrated benchmark approach including ligand shape comparison and cross-docking evaluations was implemented inside our DockBench software. The results are encouraging and show that bringing attention to the choice of the docking simulation fundamental components improves the results of the binding mode predictions.     

DATA类逆转录酶抑制剂的三维定量构效关系

采用对接方法得到HIV-1抑制剂DATA(二芳基三嗪类)分子的活性构象, 进一步用比较分子场分析(CoMFA)和比较分子相似性分析(CoMSIA)法对DATA类逆转录酶抑制剂(RTIs)的三维定量构效关系(3D-QSAR)进行了研究, 建立3D-QSAR模型, 以指导进一步结构修饰. 用此模型预测了5个DATA类似物, 预测偏差较小, 表明了所建立的模型具有较强的预测能力.     

VoteDock: Consensus docking method for prediction of protein–ligand interactions

Molecular recognition plays a fundamental role in all biological processes, and that is why great efforts have been made to understand and predict protein–ligand interactions. Finding a molecule that can potentially bind to a target protein is particularly essential in drug discovery and still remains an expensive and time‐consuming task. In silico, tools are frequently used to screen molecular libraries to identify new lead compounds, and if protein structure is known, various protein–ligand docking programs can be used. The aim of docking procedure is to predict correct poses of ligand in the binding site of the protein as well as to score them according to the strength of interaction in a reasonable time frame. The purpose of our studies was to present the novel consensus approach to predict both protein–ligand complex structure and its corresponding binding affinity. Our method used as the input the results from seven docking programs (Surflex, LigandFit, Glide, GOLD, FlexX, eHiTS, and AutoDock) that are widely used for docking of ligands. We evaluated it on the extensive benchmark dataset of 1300 protein–ligands pairs from refined PDBbind database for which the structural and affinity data was available. We compared independently its ability of proper scoring and posing to the previously proposed methods. In most cases, our method is able to dock properly approximately 20% of pairs more than docking methods on average, and over 10% of pairs more than the best single program. The RMSD value of the predicted complex conformation versus its native one is reduced by a factor of 0.5 Å. Finally, we were able to increase the Pearson correlation of the predicted binding affinity in comparison with the experimental value up to 0.5. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 32: 568–581, 2011