表面胶团修饰电极电化学测定双酚A的增敏机理及抗污性能研究

分别以2种阴离子表面活性剂(SDS、SDBS)、3种季铵盐阳离子表面活性剂(CTAB、TTAB、DTAB)和2种季铵盐型双子表面活性剂(12-3-12、12-4-12)修饰碳糊电极。通过原子力显微镜、接触角以及分析物在电极表面的电化学行为探讨了不同表面活性剂在电极表面的吸附情况,推测在浓度大于临界胶束浓度(CMC)时,季铵盐型阳离子表面活性剂CTAB、TTAB、12-3-12和12-4-12在碳糊电极表面形成了圆柱形的表面胶团,而DTAB和SDS可能是饱和单分子层吸附。以BPA为分析物,研究了表面活性剂修饰电极对BPA的电化学增敏机理,结果表明修饰电极对双酚A(BPA)的电化学增敏作用主要是因为表面胶团对BPA的增溶作用,表面活性剂和BPA间的阳离子-π作用是表面胶团增溶BPA的主要原因。     

季铵盐Gemini表面活性剂C12-6-C12·2Br对SDS胶团化的影响

十二烷基硫酸钠;混合胶团化;季铵盐Gemini表面活性剂C12-6-C12·2Br对SDS胶团化的影响     

酯基Gemini双季铵盐表面活性剂的研究进展

Gemini双季铵盐表面活性剂性能优异但生物和化学降解性差,在Gemini双季铵盐表面活性剂结构中引入酯基官能团可以提升产物性能。酯基Gemini双季铵盐表面活性剂含有酯基和双季铵盐基,具有高表面活性、吸附、絮凝、抗盐、湿润、乳化、杀菌防腐和易生物分解等优点,应用前景广阔。本文综述了酯基Gemini双季铵盐表面活性剂的合成路线、性能和石油化工的应用状况,结合发展需求对酯基Gemini双季铵盐表面活性剂的未来发展进行了分析和展望。     

阿拉伯树胶对Gemini表面活性剂界面扩张流变性质的影响

利用悬挂滴方法研究了Gemini季铵盐表面活性剂(C₁₂-Ph-C₁₂和C₁₂-8-C₁₂)和阿拉伯树胶的界面张力和界面扩张流变性质, 考察了阿拉伯树胶对C₁₂-Ph-C₁₂和C₁₂-8-C₁₂溶液界面张力和界面扩张流变性质的影响. 研究结果表明, 1%(w)阿拉伯树胶的加入显著降低了C₁₂-Ph-C₁₂和C₁₂-8-C₁₂的界面张力, 但是界面扩张模量增加,这一变化主要是由于阿拉伯树胶分子与Gemini季铵盐表面活性剂分子通过静电相互作用形成复合物. 文中提出了不同结构Gemini季铵盐表面活性剂与阿拉伯树胶分子在界面排布的示意图.     

一种酯类双季铵盐Gemini表面活性剂的合成研究

酯类双季铵盐Gemini表面活性剂含有正电荷性和酯类官能团,具有cmc低、高界面活性、易生物降解的特点。本研究先用三乙胺(TEA)和环氧氯丙烷(EPIC)合成新型季铵盐阳离子表面活性剂失水甘油基三乙基氯化铵(GTA)中间体,最后用GTA和己二酸反应合成得到一种新型酯类双季铵盐Gemini表面活性剂——双季铵盐己二酸酯表面活性剂(BQAA)。超声条件下得出BQAA合成的最佳条件为:超声频率:60KHz,反应体系pH=8,反应温度:50℃,n(GTA)∶n(己二酸)=2. 5∶1. 0,反应时间:6. 5h,BQAA为白色晶体,产率为88. 79%,通过元素分析和IR对产品BQAA进行了表征,对产物BQAA的表面活性、泡沫性能和乳化性能进行了研究,实验结果表明:BQAA的cmc=1. 3×10~(-4)mol·L~(-1),γ_(cmc)=27. 96 mN·m~(-1),泡沫形成稳定性高,起泡能力强,乳化能力好。     

DMABN测定含溴化钠或正丁醇水溶液中表面活性剂的临界胶团浓度

以对二甲氨基苯甲腈(DMABN)为探针, 测定它在含NaBr或n-C4H9OH的表面活性剂十二烷基三甲基溴化铵(C12TABr)、季铵盐Gemini表面活性剂C12-3-C12·2Br和十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)水溶液中的第二重荧光对应的强度(Ia)和特征波长(λa)对表面活性剂浓度(c)曲线. 由Ia-c曲线的转折点或λa-c曲线对应的一阶导数极小点可以获得临界胶团浓度(cmc), 扩展了DMABN探针测定表面活性剂cmc的适用性.     

三联阳离子表面活性剂的合成及复配性能

以环氧氯丙烷、叔胺、甘油为主要原料,水为溶剂,经过开环、季铵化反应,合成了新型三联季铵盐阳离子表面活性剂(Ⅲ-12-4),得率为86.9%。采用质谱和元素分析测试技术对产物结构进行表征,证明所得产物即为目标产物。通过采用DCA-315型表面张力及动态接触角分析仪对表面张力的测定研究了其与十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)复配体系的表面化学性质,稳态荧光探针法考察了微极性变化,还得到了胶束聚集数。结果表明,复配体系与单一体系相比,具有更低的临界胶束浓度(cmc)和降低表面张力的效能,表现出协同效应。当n(Ⅲ-12-4)∶n(SDS)=3∶7时,复配体系的临界表面张力(γcmc)和临界胶束浓度分别为16.95mN/m和1.33×10-5mol/L,并且胶束聚集数只有SDS的1/6,混合胶束结构紧密,微极性降低。     

十二烷基硫酸钠对两性咪唑类离子液体表面活性剂1-磺丙基-3-十二烷基咪唑内盐界面聚集行为的影响

利用界面扩张流变技术,研究了两性咪唑类离子液体表面活性剂1-磺丙基-3-十二烷基咪唑内盐(C₁₂imSP)的界面聚集行为,探讨传统表面活性剂十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)对C₁₂imSP界面聚集行为的影响机制。 结果表明,少量SDS的加入可以填补界面上疏松的C₁₂imSP分子间的空位,界面上形成表面活性剂混合吸附膜,界面张力显著降低;提高SDS的浓度,其分子从体相向界面层的扩散交换占优势,界面层分子逐渐达到饱和吸附,此后体系中有混合胶束形成。 体相胶束中富集的SDS分子对C₁₂imSP分子的“收纳”作用及进一步的“挽留”作用,加之C₁₂imSP分子本身相对较大的空间位阻效应导致界面上的C₁₂imSP分子一旦通过扩散作用被交换至体相,其很难再回复到表面层,即界面膜以SDS分子为主。 通过调节体系中SDS的含量,可以实现对混合体系SDS/C₁₂imSP/NaCl(0.1 mol/L)界面聚集行为的调控,进而实现对界面膜性质的调控。     

阳离子Gemini表面活性剂12-3-12与DNA在模拟体液中的相互作用研究

采用紫外透射光谱、透射电镜、原子力显微镜、圆二色谱(CD)等方法探讨了阳离子Gemini表面活性剂C12H25N+(CH3)2-(CH2)3-(CH3)2N+C12H25·2Br-(12-3-12)与DNA在模拟体液(SBF)中的相互作用。结果表明,SBF中较高反离子浓度不但屏蔽了DNA和12-3-12之间的静电吸引作用,而且促进了12-3-12聚集体的产生和生长,导致低盐条件下体系中出现的沉淀溶解现象的消失。SBF中DNA与12-3-12之间存在强烈的相互作用;随着12-3-12的加入,表面活性剂分子在DNA链周围聚集,类网络结构的DNA逐渐变为类似于串珠的复合物,随后出现尺寸较大的类球形复合物以及较大复合物与较小表面活性剂聚集体共存的现象。CD谱结果显示,SBF中12-3-12可以诱导DNA的构象发生改变,由自然的B构型变成高度致密的ψ相。分子动力学模拟的离子液体中表面活性剂与带相反电荷聚电解质的相互作用过程及模式与实验结果吻合良好。模拟结果也表明,SBF中较高的反离子浓度提高了聚电解质的可压缩程度,导致相同条件下SBF中聚电解质的均方回旋半径远小于稀盐水溶液(10mmol/L Na Br)体系中的聚电解质均方回旋半径。较强的离子强度不但导致体系中聚电解质和带相反电荷表面活性剂之间的相互作用存在"假饱和"现象,而且也造成体系中表面活性剂在聚电解质周围聚集数显著提高。     

用DCNPNPT测定江水中季铵盐型阳离子表面活性剂

利用三氮烯类试剂与季铵盐型阳离子表面活性剂形成离子缔合物可用于季铵盐型阳离子表面活性剂的测定。如用HDNPAPT[1]、HDAA[2]测定CTMAB、CPB,但其灵敏度有待提高。本文研究了显色剂1 (2,6 二氯 4 硝基苯) 3 (4 硝基苯) 三氮烯(DCNPNPT)[3]与阳离子表面活性剂的显色反应,结果表明,DCNPNPT与CTMAB、CPB反应的表观摩尔吸光系数分别为3 93×104L·mol 1·cm 1,和4 16×104L·mol 1·cm 1,是目前报道的用光度法测定季铵盐型阳离子表面活性剂较灵敏的体系之一。用此法测定了瓯江水中微量阳离子表面活性剂CTMAB、CPB的…     

Effect of surfactant structure on the stability of carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution

The suspending behaviors of multiple-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs), including pristine MWNTs (p-MWNTs) and acid-mixture-treated MWNTs (MWNTCOOH), stabilized by cationic single-chain surfactant, dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), and cationic gemini surfactant hexyl-alpha,beta-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide) (C 12C 6C 12Br 2) were studied systematically. The surfactant structure influences the suspendability of MWNTs dramatically as well as the surfactant adsorption behavior on the nanotubes. Although both the surfactants can disperse the MWNTs effectively, they actually show different stabilizing ability. DTAB is not capable of stabilizing these two MWNTs below critical micelle concentration (CMC). However, C 12C 6C 12Br 2 can suspend both the nanotubes effectively even well below its CMC. Moreover, the adsorption of these two surfactants reaches equilibrium at twice the CMC with the original MWNT concentration of 2 mg/mL, 2 mM for C 12C 6C 12Br 2, and 30 mM for DTAB. After the adsorption equilibrium, the maximum amounts of the two suspended MWNTs in C 12C 6C 12Br 2 solution are about twice as much as those in DTAB solution. The strong hydrophobic interaction among the C 12C 6C 12Br 2 molecules and between the C 12C 6C 12Br 2 molecules and the nanotubes as well as the high charge capacity of C 12C 6C 12Br 2 lead to its much stronger adsorption ability on the MWNTs and result in its superior stabilizing ability for the MWNTs in aqueous phase. The gemini surfactant provides a possibility to effectively stabilize the MWNTs in aqueous solutions even at very low surfactant concentration well below its CMC.     

卵清蛋白与离子型表面活性剂的相互作用

本文通过荧光光谱法、紫外-可见吸收光谱法和透射电镜并结合电导率测定分别研究了水中卵清蛋白与阴离子表面活性剂十二烷基硫酸钠（SDS）和阳离子表面活性剂十二烷基三甲基溴化铵（DTAB）和十六烷基三甲基溴化铵（CTAB）之间的相互作用。研究结果表明卵清蛋白可以增加SDS和CTAB的临界胶束浓度,但对DTAB的临界胶束浓度没有影响。阴离子表面活性剂可以使卵清蛋白构象完全伸展,而阳离子表面活性剂却不具备此种作用。表面活性剂单体与卵清蛋白的相互作用强于表面活性剂胶束与卵清蛋白的相互作用。     

Synthesis and Surface Activity of Novel Triazole—based Cationic Gemini Surfactants

Gemini surfactants, which contain two hydrophilic groups and two hydrophobic groups in the molecule, are considered as a new generation of surfactants. These surfactants are about 3 orders of magnitude more efficient at reducing surface tension and more than 2 orders of magnitude more efficient at forming micelles than conventional surfactants1. During recent years, many gemini surfactants have been synthesized, and a considerable number of investigations have been reported on their unusua…     

Mixed Micellization of Dimeric (Gemini) Surfactants and Conventional Surfactants

The aqueous solutions of mixtures of various conventional surfactants and dimeric anionic and cationic surfactants have been investigated by electrical conductivity, spectrofluorometry, and time-resolved fluorescence quenching to determine the critical micelle concentrations and the micelle aggregation numbers in these mixtures. The following systems have been investigated: 12-2-12/DTAB, 12-2-12/C(12)E(6), 12-2-12/C(12)E(8), 12-3-12/C(12)E(8), Dim3/C(12)E(8), and Dim4/C(12)E(8) (12-2-12 and 12-3-12=dimethylene-1,2- and trimethylene-1,3-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide), respectively; C(12)E(6) and C(12)E(8)=hexa- and octaethyleneglycol monododecylethers, respectively; Dim3 and Dim4=anionic dimeric surfactants of the disodium sulfonate type, Scheme 1; DTAB=dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide). For the sake of comparison the conventional surfactant mixtures DTAB/C(12)E(8) and SDS/C(12)E(8) (SDS=sodium dodecylsulfate) have also been investigated (reference systems). Synergism in micelle formation (presence of a minimum in the cmc vs composition plot) has been observed for the Dim4/C(12)E(8) mixture but not for other dimeric surfactant/nonionic surfactant mixtures investigated. The aggregation numbers of the mixed reference systems DTAB/C(12)E(8) and SDS/C(12)E(8) vary monotonously with composition from the value of the aggregation number of the pure C(12)E(8) to that of the pure ionic component. In contrast, the aggregation number of the dimeric surfactant/C(12)E(8) mixtures goes through a minimum at a low value of the dimeric surfactant mole fraction. This minimum does not appear to be correlated to the existence of synergism in micelle formation. The initial decrease of the aggregation number of the nonionic surfactant upon addition of ionic surfactant, up to a mole fraction of ionic surfactant of about 0.2 (in equivalent per total equivalent), depends little on the nature the surfactant, whether conventional or dimeric. The results also show that the microviscosity of the systems containing dimeric surfactants is larger than that of the reference systems. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.     

双子表面活性剂溶液的表面活性的研究

研究了阳离子型双子表面活性剂,二溴化-N,N'-二(二甲基烷基)乙(已)二铵,以及它们与阴离子表面活性剂十二烷基苯磺酸钠(SDBS)复配体系的表面活性,测定上述体系的平衡态表面张力。结果表明：双子表面活性剂的表面活性大大高于十二烷基三甲溴化铵(DTAB);对于两种双子表面活性剂,其表面活性和表面张力时间效应受其联接基团的影响远大于其烷基链的影响。双子表面活性剂与SDAB复配,其协同效应不如DTAB。动表面张力测定得到它们的各种参：t~i,t~m,γ~m,t*和n等值,结果表面双子表面活性剂的瞬时活性也高于DTAB。     

Effect of Sodium Barbital on the Physico‐chemical Properties of Surfactants with Different Charges

The effects of sodium barbital (SB) on the solubility of different kinds of surfactants viz., CTAB (cationic head group), SDS (anionic head group) and Triton X‐100 (non ionic head group) in solution phase as well as their first and second critical micelle concentrations (CMC1 and CMC2), the change in Kraft temperatures (T_K) and cloud points (CP) have been studied. Furthermore, the article reports SB‐surfactant interaction study, which is application oriented and highlights the underlying physico‐chemical aspects of the system through florescence and conductivity measurements. The results show that the solubility of CTAB and Triton X‐100 increases with the addition of SB, and that of SDS increases in the presence of small amounts of SB and decreases in the presence of large amounts of SB. With the increasing SB concentration, the CMC of CTAB and CMC1 of Triton X‐100 both increase, while the CMC of SDS decreases, and the CMC2 of Triton X‐100 has no obvious change. The addition of SB decreases the T_K of CTAB sharply, but it increases the T_K of SDS and the CP of Triton X‐100. The different effects of SB on the physico‐chemical properties of differently charged surfactants may be related to its different interactions with the surfactants.     

Aqueous Two‐Phase System (ATPS) Containing Gemini (12‐3‐12,2Br−) and SDS I: Phase Diagram and Properties of ATPS

Two phases coexist in an aqueous system that contains the two surfactants cationic gemini 12‐3‐12,2Br? and anionic SDS. An aqueous two‐phase system (ATPS) is formed in a narrow region of the ternary phase diagram different from that of traditional aqueous cationic‐anionic surfactant systems. In that region, the molar ratio of gemini to SDS varies with the total concentration of surfactants. ATPS not only has higher stability but also has longer phase separation time for the new systems than that of the traditional system. Furthermore, the optical properties of ATPS are different at different total concentrations. All of these experimental observations can be attributed to the unique properties of gemini surfactant and the synergy between the cationic gemini surfactant and the anionic surfactant SDS.     

Adsorption characteristics of monomeric/gemini surfactant mixtures at the silica/aqueous solution interface

The adsorption of the monomeric/gemini surfactant mixtures at the silica/aqueous solution interface has been characterized on the basis of quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) data. The gemini surfactant employed in this study was cationic 1,2-bis(dodecyldimethylammonio)ethane dibromide (12-2-12). This surfactant was mixed with monomeric surfactants (dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HTAB), and octaoxyethylenedodecyl ether (C(12)EO(8))) in the presence of an added electrolyte (NaBr). The key finding in our current study is that the addition of the gemini surfactant (12-2-12) makes significant impact on the adsorption properties even when the mole fraction of 12-2-12 is quite low in the surfactant mixtures. This is suggested by the experimental results that (i) the QCM-D adsorption isotherms measured for the monomeric/gemini surfactant mixtures shift to the region of lower surfactant concentrations compared with the monomeric single systems; (ii) the adsorbed layer morphology largely depends on the mole fraction of 12-2-12 in the surfactant mixtures, and the increased 12-2-12 mole fraction results in the less curved surface aggregates; and (iii) the addition of 12-2-12 yields a relatively rigid adsorbed layer when compared with the layer formed by the monomeric single systems. These adsorption properties result from the fact that the more favorable interaction of 12-2-12 with the silica surface sites drives the overall surfactant adsorption in these mixtures, which is particularly obvious in the region of low surfactant concentrations and at the 12-2-12 low mole fractions. We believe that this knowledge should be important when considering the formulation of gemini surfactants into various chemical products.     

Study of Fuchsin Acid Fading in Micellar Media

The rate constant of alkaline fading of fuchsin acid (FA^2?) was measured in the presence of nonionic (TX‐100), cationic (dodecltrimethylammonium bromide, DTAB), and anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS) surfactants. FA^2? has three negatively charged substituents and one positive charge, and this makes the behavior of FA^2– different from dyes such as bromophenol blue. It was observed that the reaction rate constant decreased in the presence of TX‐100, DTAB, and SDS. Binding constants of FA^2? to TX‐100, DTAB, and SDS and the related thermodynamic parameters were calculated by the stoichiometric (classical) model. The results show that the binding of FA^2? to SDS is endothermic in both regions, and the binding of FA^2? to DTAB and TX‐100 is exothermic in one region and endothermic in another region of the used concentration range of these surfactants. Also, the binding constants of FA^2? to surfactant molecules of SDS/TX‐100 and DTAB/TX‐100 mixed micelles were obtained.