O‐Benzyl‐N‐tert‐butoxy­carbonyl‐N‐methyl‐l‐tyrosine

The crystal structure of the title compound, alternatively called 3‐[4‐(benzyl­oxy)­phenyl]‐2‐(N‐tert‐butoxy­car­bonyl‐N‐methyl­amino)­propi­onic acid, C₂₂H₂₇NO₅, has been studied in order to ex­amine the role of N‐methyl­ation as a determinant of peptide conformation. The conformation of the tert‐butoxy­carbonyl group is trans–trans. The side chain has a folded conformation and the two phenyl rings are effectively perpendicular to one another. The carboxyl­ate hydroxyl group and the urethane carbonyl group form a strong intermolecular O—H?O hydrogen bond.     

5‐Acetyl‐2‐amino‐6‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile and 2‐amino‐5‐benzoyl‐6‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile acetonitrile solvate

The syntheses, X‐ray structural investigations and calculations of the conformational preferences of the carbonyl substituent with respect to the pyran ring have been carried out for the two title compounds, viz. C₁₅H₁₄N₂O₂, (II), and C₂₀H₁₆N₂O₂·C₂H₃N, (III), respectively. In both mol­ecules, the heterocyclic ring adopts a flattened boat conformation. In (II), the carbonyl group and a double bond of the heterocyclic ring are syn, but in (III) they are anti. The carbonyl group forms a short contact with a methyl group H atom in (II). The dihedral angles between the pseudo‐axial phenyl substituent and the flat part of the pyran ring are 92.7 (1) and 93.2 (1)° in (II) and (III), respectively. In the crystal structure of (II), inter­molecular N—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into a sheet along the (103) plane, while in (III), they link the mol­ecules into ribbons along the a axis.     

rac‐5‐Diphenylacetyl‐2,2,4‐trimethyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,5‐benzothiazepine and rac‐5‐formyl‐2,2,4‐trimethyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,5‐benzothiazepine

rac‐5‐Diphenylacetyl‐2,2,4‐trimethyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,5‐benzothiazepine, C₂₆H₂₇NOS, (I), and rac‐5‐formyl‐2,2,4‐trimethyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,5‐benzothiazepine, C₁₃H₁₇NOS, (II), are both characterized by a planar configuration around the heterocyclic N atom. In contrast with the chair conformation of the parent benzothiazepine, which has no substituents at the heterocyclic N atom, the seven‐membered ring adopts a boat conformation in (I) and a conformation intermediate between boat and twist‐boat in (II). The molecules lack a symmetry plane, indicating distortions from the perfect boat or twist‐boat conformations. The supramolecular architectures are significantly different, depending in (I) on C—H...O interactions and intermolecular S...S contacts, and in (II) on a single aromatic π–π stacking interaction.     

3‐O‐Acetyl‐4‐deoxy‐4‐iodo‐β‐d‐fructo­furan­osyl 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐acetyl‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d‐gluco­pyran­oside

At 160 K, the gluco­pyran­osyl ring of the title compound, C₂₀H₂₈ClIO₁₃, has a near‐ideal ⁴C₁ conformation and the fructo­furan­osyl ring has a twist ⁴T₃ conformation. The two hydroxy groups are involved in intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen bonds, with the latter interactions linking the mol­ecules into infinite one‐dimensional chains. The absolute configuration of the mol­ecule has been determined.     

5‐Acetyl‐2‐amino‐6‐methyl‐4‐(3‐nitrophenyl)‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile and 2‐amino‐5‐ethoxycarbonyl‐6‐methyl‐4‐(3‐nitrophenyl)‐4H‐pyrano‐3‐carbonitrile

The structures of the title compounds, C₁₅H₁₃N₃O₄, (I), and C₁₆H₁₅N₃O₅ [IUPAC name: ethyl 6‐amino‐5‐cyano‐2‐methyl‐4‐(3‐nitro­phenyl)‐4H‐pyrano‐3‐carboxyl­ate], (II), are very similar, with the heterocyclic rings adopting boat conformations. The pseudo‐axial m‐nitro­phenyl substituents are rotated by 84.0 (1) and 98.7 (1)° in (I) and (II), respectively, with respect to the four coplanar atoms of the boat. The dihedral angles between the phenyl rings and nitro groups are 12.1 (2) and 8.4 (2)° in (I) and (II), respectively. The two compounds have similar patterns of intermolecular N—H?O and N—H?N hydrogen bonding, which link mol­ecules into infinite tapes along b .     

4‐Hydro­xy‐1‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐N‐(4‐oxo‐2‐propyl‐3,4‐di­hydro­quinazolin‐3‐yl)‐1,2‐di­hydro­quinoline‐3‐carbox­amide

The two bicyclic fragments of the title compound, C₂₂H₂₀N₄O₄, are individually planar and are turned with respect to each other by 77.8 (2)°. The formation of intramolecular O—H?O and N—H?O hydrogen bonds causes considerable changes in the bond lengths within the amido­pyridine fragment.     

4‐Acetonyl­idene‐1‐ethyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetra­hydro‐1H‐1,5‐benzodiazepin‐2‐one

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₆N₂O₂, contains a diazepine ring, which appears in a boat conformation. An intramolecular hydrogen bond is formed between the NH group of the diazepine ring and a carbonyl O atom of one of the side chains.     

1,1,1,1,4,4,4,4‐Octacarbonyl‐2,2,3,3,5,5,6,6‐octamethyl‐cyclo‐2,3,5,6‐tetraantimony‐1,4‐dichromium

The structure of the title compound, alternatively called bis(μ‐tetramethyldistibinediyl)bis(tetracarbonylchromium), [Cr₂Sb₄(CH₃)₈(CO)₈], consists of two Me₄Sb₂ bridging units between Cr(CO)₄ complex fragments. The centre of the molecule is located on a special position of 2/m symmetry. This is the first characterized Sb₄Cr₂ heterocycle.     

From the Lithium‐2‐anilide‐2‐fluoro‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐cyclopentene‐GaCl3 Adduct to 1,4,6‐Triaza‐5‐gallium‐7‐sila‐cyclo‐3‐heptene ‐ Experimental and Quantum‐chemical Results

The lithium salt (HC–NCMe₃)₂SiFNLiR ( 1 ) R = C₆H₃(2,6‐CHMe₂)₂ reacts with trichlorogallium under displacement of the lithium ion by GaCl₃ to give the adduct [(HC–NCMe₃)₂SiFN]^– [(GaCl₃)R·Li(thf)₄]⁺ ( 1 ). Compound 1 thermally loses LiCl and forms the bicyclic ring intermediates V and VI . Compound  VI adds the aniline H₂NC₆H₃(2,6‐CHMe₂)₂ and the unsaturated, seven‐membered ring compound –NCMe₃–CH₂–CH=NCMe₃GaCl₂–NR–SiFNHR– ( 2 ) is obtained. The addition is accompanied by an enamine‐imine‐tautomerism and proves the Lewis acid character of the silicon atom in an unknown 3‐center‐2‐electron interaction of one nitrogen atom with the silicon and gallium atoms. Quantum chemical calculations of the thermal isomerisation process and crystal structures of 1 and 2 are reported.     

New routes to 1‐functionally substituted arylbenzotriazoles: 3‐Benzotriazol‐1‐yl‐pyridazine‐4‐ones, 5‐benzotriazol‐1‐yl‐pyridazine‐6‐ones and 5‐benzotriazol‐1‐yl‐pyridazine‐6‐imines

Condensation of 1‐arylhydrazono‐1‐benzotriazol‐1‐yl 2‐propanones ( 5a‐c ) with DMF DMA afforded 1‐aryl‐3‐benzotriazol‐1‐yl‐1,4‐dihydropyridazine‐4‐ones ( 8a‐c ). While condensation of 1‐functionally substituted methylbenzotriazoles 3b,c with 2‐arylhydrazono‐3‐oxoarylpropanal 13a,b give 3‐aroyl‐5‐(benzo‐triazolyl‐1‐yl)‐1,6‐dihydro‐1‐phenylpyridazine‐6‐ones and 6‐imines 14a‐d.     

Synthesis of 1‐Amino‐5,6‐diaryl‐3‐cyano‐1H‐pyridin‐2‐ones and 6,7‐Diaryl‐4‐cyano‐3‐hydroxy‐1H‐[1,2]diazepines from Isoflavones

The one‐step cyclocondensation of substituted isoflavones (=3‐phenyl‐4H‐1‐benzopyran‐4‐ones) with cyanoacetohydrazide in the presence of KOH afforded a mixture of 1‐amino‐5,6‐diaryl‐3‐cyano‐1H‐2‐pyridin‐2‐ones and 6,7‐diaryl‐4‐cyano‐3‐hydroxy‐1H‐[1,2]diazepines.     

7‐Hydr­oxy‐6‐methoxy‐3‐[(2‐oxo‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐7‐yl)oxy]‐2H‐1‐benzopyran‐2‐one

The title compound, daphnoretin, C₁₉H₁₂O₇, was isolated from the leaves of Stellera chamaejasme L. Two independent mol­ecules are present in the asymmetric unit, with similar conformations. Each of the independent mol­ecules is composed of two chromene systems connected by an ether bridge. The dihedral angles between the mean planes of the two chromene systems are 86.9 (2) and 81.9 (3)°. Mol­ecules form chains via hydrogen bonds and adjacent chains are parallel to each other.     

N‐Amidino‐4‐hydroxy‐l‐proline monohydrate and N‐amidino‐l‐methionine monohydrate

The title amidino‐amino acids (a‐Hpro), C₆H₁₁N₃O₃·H₂O, (I), and a‐Met, C₆H₁₃N₃O₂S·H₂O, (II), respectively, exist in the form of zwitterions. The five‐membered pyrrolidine ring in (I) adopts an envelope conformation, with the Cγ atom out of the plane defined by the rest of the ring atoms, and with the hydroxyl and carboxyl­ate groups in a trans configuration relative to the ring plane. The two crystallographically independent zwitterions in (II) reveal quite different conformations of their side chains and a slightly different orientation of the guanidine moiety with respect to the carboxyl­ate group. The crystal structures of both (I) and (II) are stabilized by extensive networks of O—H·O, N—H·O and C—H·O hydrogen bonds, the network being three‐dimensional in (I) and two‐dimensional in (II).     

1,3‐Dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐4,6‐diphenyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydropyridine‐3‐carbonitrile

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₂₀H₁₈N₂O, reveals a distorted half‐chair conformation of the central tetra­hydro­pyridine (THP) ring, with the cyano‐ and adjacent phenyl‐substituted C atoms displaced by 0.329 (1) and ?0.315 (1) Å, respectively, from the THP best plane. Steric interactions force the phenyl rings out of the THP plane by 49.21 (9) and 65.76 (5)°. The cyano moiety is coplanar with the THP plane.     

A simple synthesis of 5‐ethoxycarbonyl‐6‐phenyl‐1,3‐dioxin‐4‐ones and ethyl 3‐benzoyl‐4‐oxo‐2,6‐diphenylpyran‐5‐carboxylate

4‐Ethoxycarbonyl‐5‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydrofuran‐2,3‐dione 1 reacts with aldehydes via the acylketene intermediate 2 giving the 1,3‐dioxin‐4‐ones 3a‐e and the 1,4‐bis(5‐ethoxycarbonyl‐4‐oxo‐6‐phenyl‐4H‐1,3‐dioxin‐2‐yl)benzene 4 , and a one step reaction between dibenzoylmethane and oxalylchloride gave 3,5‐dibenzoyl‐2,6‐diphenyl‐4‐pyrone 7 . The reaction of 1 with dibenzoylmethane, a dicarbonyl compound, provided ethyl 3‐benzoyl‐4‐oxo‐2,6‐diphenylpyran‐5‐carboxylate derivative 9 . Compound 9 was converted into the corresponding ethyl 3‐benzoyl‐4‐hydroxy‐2,6‐diphenylpyridine‐5‐carboxylate derivative 10 via its reaction with ammonium hydroxyde solution in 1 ‐butanol.     

Zur Hydrolyse von 2,3‐Dihydro‐1,3‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐yliden. Die Kristallstruktur von 1,3‐Di‐tert‐butyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazoliumhydrogencarbonat

On the Hydrolysis of 2,3‐Dihydro‐1,3‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene. The Crystal Structure of 1,3‐Di‐tert‐butyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazolium Bicarbonate 1,3‐Di‐tert‐butyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazolium bicarbonate ( 7 ), formed on the exposure of 2,3‐dihydro‐1,3‐di‐tert‐butyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene ( 6 ) towards air, is prepared on the reaction of 6 with ammonium bicarbonate; its crystal structure analysis reveals the presence of dimeric bicarbonate anions linked to each other and to the imidazolium ions with hydrogen bonds.     

3‐Diphenyl­phosphino‐1,2:5,6‐di‐O‐isopropyl­idene‐4‐O‐methyl‐1d‐chiro‐inositol

The novel title compound, C₂₅H₃₁O₆P, contains rigid fused rings which are shown to be similar to the precursor structures. Weak C—H⋯O inter­molecular inter­actions produce two‐dimensional sheets composed of R₄⁴(28) rings.     

An efficient synthesis of a class of novel N‐Alkyl‐N‐aryl‐4‐hydroxy‐1‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐1,2‐dihydro‐3‐quinolinecarbothioamides

The novel title compounds have been prepared in high yield by an optimized amide coupling followed by a Dieckmann cyclization. Additionally, this new route is amenable to preparative scale synthesis.     

4‐Ethynyl‐4‐hydroxycyclohexan‐1‐one and 4‐ethynyl‐4‐hydroxy‐2,3,5,6‐tetramethylcyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one

The title compounds, C₈H₁₀O₂, (I), and C₁₂H₁₄O₂, (II), occurred as by‐products in the controlled synthesis of a series of bis­(gem‐alkynols), prepared as part of an extensive study of synthon formation in simple gem‐alkynol derivatives. The two 4‐(gem‐alkynol)‐1‐ones crystallize in space group P2₁/c, (I) with Z′ = 1 and (II) with Z′ = 2. Both structures are dominated by O—H?O=C hydrogen bonds, which form simple chains in the cyclo­hexane derivative, (I), and centrosymmetric dimers, of both symmetry‐independent mol­ecules, in the cyclo­hexa‐2,5‐diene, (II). These strong synthons are further stabilized by C[triple‐bond]C—H?O=C, C_methylene—H?O(H) and C_methyl—H?O(H) interactions. The direct intermolecular interactions between donors and acceptors in the gem‐alkynol group, which characterize the bis­(gem‐alkynol) analogues of (I) and (II), are not present in the ketone derivatives studied here.     

2,2,4,4‐Tetra‐tert‐butyl‐1,3,5,2,4‐benzotrioxadisilepine‐7‐carbaldehyde

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C₂₃H₄₀O₄Si₂, features an approximate non‐crystallographic C₂ symmetry axis. The aldehyde group is disordered over two positions with similar occupancies. The geometry of the isolated mol­ecule was studied by ab initio quantum mechanical calculations employing a mol­ecular orbital Hartree–Fock method. The calculations reproduce well the equilibrium geometry but slightly overestimate the value of the Si—O bond lengths of the trioxadisilepine ring.