A note on the coefficient rings of polynomial rings

LetA andB be two reduced commutative rings with finitely many minimal prime ideals. If the polynomial algebrasA[X ₁ …X _n ]=B[Y ₁ …Y _n ] whereX _i ,Y _iF are variables overA andB respectively, then there exists an injective ring homomorphism ϕ:A→B such thatB is finitely generated over ϕ(A).     

On Non-Congruence Subgroups of the Analogue of the Modular Group in Characteristic p

Let k[t] be the polynomial ring over a finite field k. The group SL ₂(k[t]) is often referred to as the analogue, in characteristic p, of the classical modular group SL ₂( ), where is the ring of rational integers. It is well-known that the smallest index of a non-congruence subgroup of SL ₂( ) is 7. Here we compute this index for SL ₂(k[t]). (In all but 6 cases it turns out to be 1 + q, where q is the order of k.)     

On the Key Equation Over a Commutative Ring

We define alternant codes over a commutative ring R and a corresponding key equation. We show that when the ring is a domain, e.g. the p-adic integers, the error-locator polynomial is the unique monic minimal polynomial (equivalently, the unique shortest linear recurrence) of the finite sequence of syndromes and that it can be obtained by Algorithm MR of Norton.WhenR is a local ring, we show that the syndrome sequence may have more than one (monic) minimal polynomial, but that all the minimal polynomials coincide modulo the maximal ideal ofR . We characterise the set of minimal polynomials when R is a Hensel ring. We also apply these results to decoding alternant codes over a local ring R: it is enough to find any monic minimal polynomial over R and to find its roots in the residue field. This gives a decoding algorithm for alternant codes over a finite chain ring, which generalizes and improves a method of Interlando et. al. for BCH and Reed-Solomon codes over a Galois ring.     

Minimal prime ideals of reduced rings

Let R be a reduced ring with Q its Martindale symmetric ring of quotients, and let B be the complete Boolean algebra of all idempotents in C, where C is the extended centroid of R. It is proved that every minimal prime ideal of R must be of the form mQ∩R for some maximal ideal m of B but the converse is in general not true. In addition, if R is centrally closed or has only finitely many minimal prime ideals, then the converse also holds. By applying the explicit expression, many properties of minimal prime ideals of reduced rings are realized more easily.     

Minimalities and Modules over Dedekind-Like Rings

We are interested in (right) modules M satisfying the following weak divisibility condition: If R is the underlying ring, then for every r ∈ R either Mr = 0 or Mr = M. Over a commutative ring, this is equivalent to say that M is connected with regular generics. Over arbitrary rings, modules which are “minimal” in several model theoretic senses satisfy this condition. In this article, we investigate modules with this weak divisibility property over Dedekind-like rings and over other related classes of rings.     

Arithmetic of the Modular Function j1,8

Since the genus of the modular curve X_1 (8) = _1 (8) * is zero, we find a field generator j _1,8(z) = ₃(2z)/₃(4z) (₃(z) := _n ein ^2z ) such that the function field over X ₁(8) is (j _1,8). We apply this modular function j _1,8 to the construction of some class fields over an imaginary quadratic field K, and compute the minimal polynomial of the singular value of the Hauptmodul N(j _1,8) of (j _1,8).     

Strong Cleanness of Matrix Rings Over Commutative Rings

Let R be a commutative local ring. It is proved that R is Henselian if and only if each R-algebra which is a direct limit of module finite R-algebras is strongly clean. So, the matrix ring 𝕄 _n (R) is strongly clean for each integer n > 0 if R is Henselian and we show that the converse holds if either the residue class field of R is algebraically closed or R is an integrally closed domain or R is a valuation ring. It is also shown that each R-algebra which is locally a direct limit of module-finite algebras, is strongly clean if R is a π-regular commutative ring.     

Symplectic algebras and poisson algebras

Abstract

A ring R is called left P-injective if for every a ∈ R, aR = r(l(a)) where l( ? ) and r( ? ) denote left and right annihilators respectively. The ring R is called left GP-injective if for any 0 ≠ a ∈ R, there exists n > 0 such that a ⁿ  ≠ 0 and a ⁿ R = r(l(a ⁿ )). As a response to an open question on GP -injective rings, an example of a left GP-injective ring which is not left P-injective is given. It is also proved here that a ring R is left FP -injective if and only if every matrix ring 𝕄 _n (R) is left GP-injective.     

A Class of Quasipolar Rings

An element a of a ring R is called J-quasipolar if there exists p ² = p ∈ R satisfying p ∈ comm²(a) and a + p ∈ J(R); R is called J-quasipolar in case each of its elements is J-quasipolar. The class of this sort of rings lies properly between the class of uniquely clean rings and the class of quasipolar rings. In particular, every J-quasipolar element in a ring is quasipolar. It is shown, in this paper, that a ring R is J-quasipolar iff R/J(R) is boolean and R is quasipolar. For a local ring R, we prove that every n × n upper triangular matrix ring over R is J-quasipolar iff R is uniquely bleached and R/J(R) ? ?₂. Moreover, it is proved that any matrix ring of size greater than 1 is never J-quasipolar. Consequently, we determine when a 2 × 2 matrix over a commutative local ring is J-quasipolar. A criterion in terms of solvability of the characteristic equation is obtained for such a matrix to be J-quasipolar.     

On a Generalization of Injective Rings

Abstract

A ring R is called left IP-injective if every homomorphism from a left ideal of R into R with principal image is given by right multiplication by an element of R. It is shown that R is left IP-injective if and only if R is left P-injective and left GIN (i.e., r(I ∩ K) = r(I) + r(K) for each pair of left ideals I and K of R with I principal). We prove that R is QF if and only if R is right noetherian and left IP-injective if and only if R is left perfect, left GIN and right simple-injective. We also show that, for a right CF left GIN-ring R, R is QF if and only if Soc(R _R ) ? Soc( _R R). Two examples are given to show that an IP-injective ring need not be self-injective and a right IP-injective ring is not necessarily left IP-injective respectively.     

Armendariz group rings

For a torsion or torsion-free group G and a field F, we characterize the group algebra FG that is Armendariz. Armendariz property for a group ring over a general ring R is also studied and related to those of Abelian group rings and the quaternion ring over R.     

On Rings Having McCoy-Like Conditions

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we study the behavior of the couniform (or dual Goldie) dimension of a module under various polynomial extensions. For a ring automorphism σ ∈ Aut(R), we use the notion of a σ-compatible module M _R to obtain results on the couniform dimension of the polynomial modules M[x], M[x ^?1], and M[x, x ^?1] over suitable skew extension rings.     

On Weak Armendariz Rings

We introduce weak Armendariz rings which are a generalization of semicommutative rings and Armendariz rings, and investigate their properties. Moreover, we prove that a ring R is weak Armendariz if and only if for any n, the n-by-n upper triangular matrix ring T _n (R) is weak Armendariz. If R is semicommutative, then it is proven that the polynomial ring R[x] over R and the ring R[x]/(x ⁿ ), where (x ⁿ ) is the ideal generated by x ⁿ and n is a positive integer, are weak Armendariz.     

A Note on Strongly Clean Matrix Rings

Let R be an associative ring with identity. An element a ∈ R is called strongly clean if a = e + u with e ² = e ∈ R, u a unit of R, and eu = ue. A ring R is called strongly clean if every element of R is strongly clean. Strongly clean rings were introduced by Nicholson [7 Nicholson , W. K. ( 1999 ). Strongly clean rings and Fitting's lemma . Comm. Algebra 27 : 3583 – 3592 .[Taylor &; Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. It is unknown yet when a matrix ring over a strongly clean ring is strongly clean. Several articles discussed this topic when R is local or strongly π-regular. In this note, necessary conditions for the matrix ring 𝕄 _n (R) (n > 1) over an arbitrary ring R to be strongly clean are given, and the strongly clean property of 𝕄₂(RC ₂) over the group ring RC ₂ with R local is obtained.     

When is a 2 × 2 Matrix Ring Over a Commutative Local Ring Quasipolar?

A ring R is quasipolar if for any a ∈ R, there exists p ² = p ∈ R such that p ∈ comm²(a), p + a ∈ U(R) and ap ∈ R ^qnil . In this article, we determine when a 2 × 2 matrix over a commutative local ring is quasipolar. A criterion in terms of solvability of the characteristic equation is obtained for such a matrix to be quasipolar. Consequently, we obtain several equivalent conditions for the 2 × 2 matrix ring over a commutative local ring to be quasipolar. Furthermore, it is shown that the 2 × 2 matrix ring over the ring of p-adic integers is quasipolar.     

Gaussian Property of the Rings R(X) and R〈X〉

The content of a polynomial f over a commutative ring R is the ideal c(f) of R generated by the coefficients of f. A commutative ring R is said to be Gaussian if c(fg) = c(f)c(g) for every polynomials f and g in R[X]. A number of authors have formulated necessary and sufficient conditions for R(X) (respectively, R?X?) to be semihereditary, have weak global dimension at most one, be arithmetical, or be Prüfer. An open question raised by Glaz is to formulate necessary and sufficient conditions that R(X) (respectively, R?X?) have the Gaussian property. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for the rings R(X) and R?X? in terms of the ring R in case the square of the nilradical of R is zero.