The robertson-taussky inequality revisited

Let a positive definite Hermitian matrix H?Mⁿ (C) be decomposed as H=A + iB, with A, B ? M_nm (R). We give two new proofs of the inequality det H ≤ det A (with equality iff B = 0. each of which vields something futher. One exhibits majorization between the eigenvalues of A and H the other allows proof of the permanental analog per H≥per A.     

Simple-direct-modules

A right R-module M is called simple-direct-injective if, whenever, A and B are simple submodules of M with A?B, and B?^⊕M, then A?^⊕M. Dually, M is called simple-direct-projective if, whenever, A and B are submodules of M with M∕A?B?^⊕M and B simple, then A?^⊕M. In this paper, we continue our investigation of these classes of modules strengthening many of the established results on the subject. For example, we show that a ring R is uniserial (artinian serial) with J²(R) = 0 iff every simple-direct-projective right R-module is an SSP-module (SIP-module) iff every simple-direct-injective right R-module is an SIP-module (SSP-module).     

Morita Duality for the Rings of Generalized Power Series

Let A, B be associative rings with identity, and (S, ≤) a strictly totally ordered monoid which is also artinian and finitely generated. For any bimodule _A M _B , we show that the bimodule _{[[ AS,≤ ]]}[M ^{S ,≤}]_{[[ BS, ≤ ]]} defines a Morita duality if and only if _A M _B defines a Morita duality and A is left noetherian, B is right noetherian. As a corollary, it is shown that the ring [[A ^{S ,≤}]] of generalized power series over A has a Morita duality if and only if A is a left noetherian ring with a Morita duality induced by a bimodule _A M _B such that B is right noetherian. Received April 13, 1999, Accepted December 12, 1999     

Strong Convergence Theorems for Maximal Monotone Operators with Nonlinear Mappings in Hilbert Spaces

Let C be a closed and convex subset of a real Hilbert space H. Let T be a nonexpansive mapping of C into itself, A be an α-inverse strongly-monotone mapping of C into H and let B be a maximal monotone operator on H, such that the domain of B is included in C. We introduce an iteration scheme of finding a point of F (T)∩(A+B)⁻¹0, where F (T) is the set of fixed points of T and (A+B)⁻¹0 is the set of zero points of A+B. Then, we prove a strong convergence theorem, which is different from the results of Halpern’s type. Using this result, we get a strong convergence theorem for finding a common fixed point of two nonexpansive mappings in a Hilbert space. Further, we consider the problem for finding a common element of the set of solutions of a mathematical model related to equilibrium problems and the set of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping.     

An algebraic invariant for Jordan automorphisms on β(<Emphasis Type="Italic">H</Emphasis>): The set of idempotents

Let H be an infinite dimensional complex Hilbert space. Denote by B(H) the algebra of all bounded linear operators on H, and by I(H) the set of all idempotents in B(H). Suppose that Φ is a surjective map from B(H) onto itself. If for every λ ∈ -1,1,2,3, and A, B ∈ B(H),A-λB ∈I(H) ⇔ Φ(A) -λΦ(B) ∈I(H, then Φ is a Jordan ring automorphism, i.e. there exists a continuous invertible linear or conjugate linear operator T on H such that Φ(A) = TAT ^-1 for all A ∈ B(H), or Φ(A) = TA*T ^-1 for all A ∈ B(H); if, in addition, A-iB ∈I(H)⇔ Φ(A)-iΦ(B) ∈I(H), here i is the imaginary unit, then Φ is either an automorphism or an anti-automorphism.     

Elementary operators on self-adjoint operators

Let H be a Hilbert space and let A and B be standard ∗-operator algebras on H. Denote by As and Bs the set of all self-adjoint operators in A and B, respectively. Assume that and are surjective maps such that M(AM^∗(B)A)=M(A)BM(A) and M^∗(BM(A)B)=M^∗(B)AM^∗(B) for every pair A∈As, B∈Bs. Then there exist an invertible bounded linear or conjugate-linear operator and a constant c∈{−1,1} such that M(A)=cTAT^∗, A∈As, and M^∗(B)=cT^∗BT, B∈Bs.     

THE DIMENSION OF IRREDUCIBLE MODULES FOR TRANSITIVE MODULE ALGEBRAS

We prove that for a semisimple Hopf algebra H, if A is a transitive H-module algebra and M is an irreducible A-module, then dim(A) divides dim(M)²dim(H).

     

An introduction to presentations of monoid acts: quotients and subacts

The purpose of this article is to introduce the theory of presentations of monoids acts. We aim to construct “nice” general presentations for various act constructions pertaining to subacts and Rees quotients. More precisely, given an M-act A and a subact B of A, on the one hand, we construct presentations for B and the Rees quotient A/B using a presentation for A, and on the other hand, we derive a presentation for A from presentations for B and A/B. We also construct a general presentation for the union of two subacts. From our general presentations, we deduce a number of finite presentability results. Finally, we consider the case where a subact B has a finite complement in an M-act A. We show that if M is a finitely generated monoid and B is finitely presented, then A is finitely presented. We also show that if M belongs to a wide class of monoids, including all finitely presented monoids, then the converse also holds.     

Hausdorff measures of different dimensions are not Borel isomorphic

We show that Hausdorff measures of different dimensions are not Borel isomorphic; that is, the measure spaces (ℝ, B, H ^s ) and (ℝ, B, H ^t ) are not isomorphic if s ≠ t, s, t ∈ [0, 1], where B is the σ-algebra of Borel subsets of ℝ and H ^d is the d-dimensional Hausdorff measure. This answers a question of B. Weiss and D. Preiss. To prove our result, we apply a random construction and show that for every Borel function ƒ: ℝ → ℝ and for every d ∈ [0, 1] there exists a compact set C of Hausdorff dimension d such that ƒ(C) has Hausdorff dimension ≤ d. We also prove this statement in a more general form: If A ⊂ ℝⁿ is Borel and ƒ: A → ℝ^m is Borel measurable, then for every d ∈ [0, 1] there exists a Borel set B ⊂ A such that dim B = d·dim A and dim ƒ(B) ≤ d·dim ƒ (A). Partially supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund grant no. T 49786.     

Invariant Constructions of Simple and Maximal Sets

The main results of the present paper are the following theorems: 1. There is no e ∈ ω such that for any A, B ? ω, S^A = W is simple in A, and if A′ ?_T B′, then S^A =* S^B. 2 There is an e ∈ ω such that for any A, B ? ω, M^A = W_e is incomplete maximal in A, and if A =* B, then M^A ?_T M^B.     

DOI-KOPPINEN HOPF BIMODULES ARE MODULES

I construct a generalized twisted smash product A ^H B, which gives an abstract structure of Cibils-Rosso's algebra X associated to a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra H, for the H-bimodule algebra A and H-bicomodule algebra B. I show that the Doi-Koppinen Hopf (H, B, D)-bimodules are modules over a certain algebra which is of this type. Moreover, if D is finitely generated projective as a k-module, there exists a k-module-preserving equivalence of categories between the category of Doi-Koppinen (H, B, D)-Hopf bimodules and the category of left (D ^*op ? D ^*) ^{H?H op} (B ? B ^op )-modules.     

Lattice Tensor Products i. Coordinatization

G. Grätzer and F. Wehrung introduced the lattice tensor product, A B, of the lattices A and B. One of the most important properties is that for a simple and bounded lattice A, the lattice A B is a congruence-preserving extension of B. The lattice A B is defined as the set of certain subsets of A B; there is no easy test when a subset belongs to A B. A special case, M ₃B, was earlier defined by G. Gräatzer and F. Wehrung as M ₃, the it Boolean triple construct, defined as a subset of B ³, with a simple criterion when a triple belongs. A~recent paper of G. Grätzer and E. T. Schmidt illustrates the importance of this Boolean triple arithmetic. In this paper we show that for any finite lattice A, we can ``coordinatize" A B, that is, represent A B as a subset of B ⁿ (where n is the number of join-irreducible elements of A), and provide an effective criteria to recognize the n-tuples of elements of B that occur in this representation. To show the utility of this coordinatization, we reprove a special case of the above result: for a finite simple lattice A, the lattice A B is a congruence-preserving extension of B.     

Hypercyclic Pairs of Coanalytic Toeplitz Operators

A pair of commuting operators, (A,B), on a Hilbert space is said to be hypercyclic if there exists a vector such that {A ⁿ B ^k x : n, k ≥ 0} is dense in . If f, g ∈H ^∞(G) where G is an open set with finitely many components in the complex plane, then we show that the pair (M ^* _f , M ^* _g ) of adjoints of multiplcation operators on a Hilbert space of analytic functions on G is hypercyclic if and only if the semigroup they generate contains a hypercyclic operator. However, if G has infinitely many components, then we show that there exists f, g ∈H ^∞(G) such that the pair (M ^* _f , M ^* _g ) is hypercyclic but the semigroup they generate does not contain a hypercyclic operator. We also consider hypercyclic n-tuples.     

The structure of the 3-separations of 3-connected matroids

Tutte defined a k-separation of a matroid M to be a partition (A,B) of the ground set of M such that |A|,|B|k and r(A)+r(B)−r(M)<k. If, for all m<n, the matroid M has no m-separations, then M is n-connected. Earlier, Whitney showed that (A,B) is a 1-separation of M if and only if A is a union of 2-connected components of M. When M is 2-connected, Cunningham and Edmonds gave a tree decomposition of M that displays all of its 2-separations. When M is 3-connected, this paper describes a tree decomposition of M that displays, up to a certain natural equivalence, all non-trivial 3-separations of M.     

Lifting Modules with Indecomposable Decompositions

A module M is called a “lifting module” if, any submodule A of M contains a direct summand B of M such that A/B is small in M/B. This is a generalization of projective modules over perfect rings as well as the dual of extending modules. It is well known that an extending module with ascending chain condition (a.c.c.) on the annihilators of its elements is a direct sum of indecomposable modules. If and when a lifting module has such a decomposition is not known in general. In this article, among other results, we prove that a lifting module M is a direct sum of indecomposable modules if (i) rad(M ^(I)) is small in M ^(I) for every index set I, or, (ii) M has a.c.c. on the annihilators of (certain) elements, and rad(M) is small in M.     

Simultaneous similarity of matrices

In this paper we solve completely and explicitly the long-standing problem of classifying pairs of n × n complex matrices (A, B) under the simultaneous similarity (TAT⁻¹, TBT⁻¹). Roughly speaking, the classification decomposes to a finite number of steps. In each step we consider an open algebraic set ⁰_n,2,r,π M_n × M_n (M_n = the set of n × n complex-valued matrices). Here r and π are two positive integers. Then we construct a finite number of rational functions ø₁,…,ø_s in the entries of A and B whose values are constant on all pairs similar in _n,2,r,π to (A, B). The values of the functions ø_i(A, B), I = 1,…, s, determine a finite number (at most κ(n, 2, r)) of similarity classes in _n,2,r,π. Let S_n be the subspace of complex symmetric matrices in M_n. For (A, B) ε S_n × S_n we consider the similarity class (TAT^t, TBT^t), where T ranges over all complex orthogonal matrices. Then the characteristic polynomial |λI − (A + xB)| determines a finite number of similarity classes for almost all pairs (A, B) ε S_n × S_n.     

Utumi modules

A right R-module M is called a U-module if, whenever A and B are submodules of M with A?B and A ∩ B = 0, there exist two summands K and L of M such that A?^essK, B?^essL and K⊕L?^⊕M. The class of U-modules is a simultaneous and strict generalization of three fundamental classes of modules; namely, the quasi-continuous, the square-free, and the automorphism-invariant modules. In this paper we show that the class of U-modules inherits some of the important features of the aforementioned classes of modules. For example, a U-module M is clean if and only if it has the finite exchange property, if and only if it has the full exchange property. As an immediate consequence, every strongly clean U-module has the substitution property and hence is Dedekind-finite. In particular, the endomorphism ring of a strongly clean U-module has stable range 1.     

Torsion in the full orbifold <Emphasis Type="Italic">K</Emphasis>-theory of abelian symplectic quotients

Let (M, ω, Φ) be a Hamiltonian T-space and let H í T{H\subseteq T} be a closed Lie subtorus. Under some technical hypotheses on the moment map Φ, we prove that there is no additive torsion in the integral full orbifold K-theory of the orbifold symplectic quotient [M//H]. Our main technical tool is an extension to the case of moment map level sets the well-known result that components of the moment map of a Hamiltonian T-space M are Morse-Bott functions on M. As first applications, we conclude that a large class of symplectic toric orbifolds, as well as certain S ¹-quotients of GKM spaces, have integral full orbifold K-theory that is free of additive torsion. Finally, we introduce the notion of semilocally Delzant which allows us to formulate sufficient conditions under which the hypotheses of the main theorem hold. We illustrate our results using low-rank coadjoint orbits of type A and B.     

The Multiplicity Free Permutation Representations of the Ree Groups 2 G 2(q), the Suzuki Groups 2 B 2(q), and Their Automorphism Groups

Abstract

Let G a simple group of type ² B ₂(q) or ² G ₂(q), where q is an odd power of 2 or 3, respectively. The main goal of this paper is to determine the multiplicity free permutation representations of G and A ≤ Aut(G) where A is a subgroup containing a copy of G. Let B be a Borel subgroup of G. If G = ² B ₂(q) we show that there is only one non-trivial multiplicity free permutation representation, namely the representation of G associated to the action on G/B. If G = ² G ₂(q) we show that there are exactly two such non-trivial representations, namely the representations of G associated to the action on G/B and the action on G/M, where M = UC with U the maximal unipotent subgroup of B and C the unique subgroup of index 2 in the maximal split torus of B. The multiplicity free permutation representations of A correspond to the actions on A/H where H is isomorphic to a subgroup containing B if G = ² B ₂(q), and containing M if G = ² G ₂(q). The problem of determining the multiplicity free representations of the finite simple groups is important, for example, in the classification of distance-transitive graphs.     

Azumaya Extensions and Galois Correspondence

For H a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra over a field k, we study H*-Galois Azumaya extensions A, i.e., A is an H-module algebra which is H*-Galois with A/A^H separable and A^H Azumaya. We prove that there is a Galois correspondence between a set of separable subalgebras of A and a set of separable subalgebras of C_A(A^H), thus generalizing the work of Alfaro and Szeto for H a group algebra. We also study Galois bases and Hirata systems.1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: 16W30, 16H05