On the Geometry of Hermitian Matrices of Order Three Over Finite Fields

Some geometry of Hermitian matrices of order three over GF(q²) is studied. The variety coming from rank 2 matrices is a cubic hypersurface M₇³of PG(8,q ) whose singular points form a variety H corresponding to all rank 1 Hermitian matrices. BesideM₇³ turns out to be the secant variety of H. We also define the Hermitian embedding of the point-set of PG(2, q²) whose image is exactly the variety H. It is a cap and it is proved that PGL(3, q²) is a subgroup of all linear automorphisms of H. Further, the Hermitian lifting of a collineation of PG(2, q²) is defined. By looking at the point orbits of such lifting of a Singer cycle of PG(2, q²) new mixed partitions of PG(8,q ) into caps and linear subspaces are given.     

Characterizations of Hermitian varieties by intersection numbers

In this paper, we give characterizations of the classical generalized quadrangles H(3, q ²) and H(4, q ²), embedded in PG(3, q ²) and PG(4, q ²), respectively. The intersection numbers with lines and planes characterize H(3, q ²), and H(4, q ²) is characterized by its intersection numbers with planes and solids. This result is then extended to characterize all Hermitian varieties in dimension at least 4 by their intersection numbers with planes and solids.      

Unitals in the Hall plane

The unitals in the Hall plane are studied by deriving PG(2,q ²)and observing the effect on the unitals of PG(2,q ²).The number of Buekenhout and Buekenhout-Metz unitals in the Hall plane is determined. As a corollary we show that the classical unital is not embeddble in the Hall plane as a Buekenhout unital and that the Buekenhout unitals of H(q ²)are not embeddable as Buekenhout unitals in the Desarguesian plane. Finally, we generalize this technique to other translation planes.     

Transitive Arcs in Planes of Even Order

When one considers the hyperovals inPG(2,q),qeven,q>2, then the hyperoval inPG(2, 4) and the Lunelli-Sce hyperoval inPG(2, 16) are the only hyperovals stabilized by a transitive projective group [10]. In both cases, this group is an irreducible group fixing no triangle in the plane of the hyperoval, nor in a cubic extension of that plane. Using Hartley's classification of subgroups ofPGL₃(q),qeven [6], allk-arcs inPG(2,q) fixed by a transitive irreducible group, fixing no triangle inPG(2,q) or inPG(2,q³), are determined. This leads to new 18-, 36- and 72-arcs inPG(2,q),q=2^2h. The projective equivalences among the arcs are investigated and each section ends with a detailed study of the collineation groups of these arcs.     

A Combinatorial Characterization of Hermitian Curves

A unital U with parameter q is a 2 – (q ³ + 1, q + 1, 1) design. If a point set U in PG(2, q ²) together with its (q + 1)-secants forms a unital, then U is called a Hermitian arc. Through each point p of a Hermitian arc H there is exactly one line L having with H only the point p in common; this line L is called the tangent of H at p. For any prime power q, the absolute points and nonabsolute lines of a unitary polarity of PG(2, q ²) form a unital that is called the classical unital. The points of a classical unital are the points of a Hermitian curve in PG(2, q ²).Let H be a Hermitian arc in the projective plane PG(2, q ²). If tangents of H at collinear points of H are concurrent, then H is a Hermitian curve. This result proves a well known conjecture on Hermitian arcs.     

Blocking Sets and Derivable Partial Spreads

We prove that a GF(q)-linear Rédei blocking set of size q ^t + q ^t–1 + ··· + q + 1 of PG(2,q ^t) defines a derivable partial spread of PG(2t – 1, q). Using such a relationship, we are able to prove that there are at least two inequivalent Rédei minimal blocking sets of size q ^t + q ^t–1 + ··· + q + 1 in PG(2,q ^t), if t 4.     

Some Characterizations of Finite Hermitian Veroneseans

We characterize the finite Veronesean of all Hermitian varieties of PG(n,q²) as the unique representation of PG(n,q²) in PG(d,q), d n(n+2), where points and lines of PG(n,q²) are represented by points and ovoids of solids, respectively, of PG(d,q), with the only condition that the point set of PG(d,q) corresponding to the point set of PG(n,q²) generates PG(d,q). Using this result for n=2, we show that is characterized by the following properties: (1) ; (2) each hyperplane of PG(8,q) meets in q²+1, q³+1 or q³+q²+1 points; (3) each solid of PG(8,q) having at least q+3 points in common with shares exactly q²+1 points with it.51E24     

Complete Spans on Hermitian Varieties

Let L be a general linear complex in PG(3, q) for any prime power q. We show that when GF(q) is extended to GF(q ²), the extended lines of L cover a non-singular Hermitian surface H ? H(3, q ²) of PG(3, q ²). We prove that if Sis any symplectic spread PG(3, q), then the extended lines of this spread form a complete (q ² + 1)-span of H. Several other examples of complete spans of H for small values of q are also discussed. Finally, we discuss extensions to higher dimensions, showing in particular that a similar construction produces complete (q ³ + 1)-spans of the Hermitian variety H(5, q ²).     

Complete ( q 2?+ q +?8)/2-caps in the spaces PG (3, q ), q ≡ 2 (mod 3) an odd prime, and a complete 20-cap in PG (3, 5)

An infinite family of complete (q ² + q + 8)/2-caps is constructed in PG(3, q) where q is an odd prime ≡ 2 (mod 3), q ≥ 11. This yields a new lower bound on the second largest size of complete caps. A variant of our construction also produces one of the two previously known complete 20-caps in PG(3, 5). The associated code weight distribution and other combinatorial properties of the new (q ² + q + 8)/2-caps and the 20-cap in PG(3, 5) are investigated. The updated table of the known sizes of the complete caps in PG(3, q) is given. As a byproduct, we have found that the unique complete 14-arc in PG(2, 17) contains 10 points on a conic. Actually, this shows that an earlier general result dating back to the Seventies fails for q = 17.      

Some p‐ranks related to a conic in PG(2, q)

Let A be the incidence matrix of lines and points of the classical projective plane PG(2, q) with q odd. With respect to a conic in PG(2, q), the matrix A is partitioned into 9 submatrices. The rank of each of these submatrices over F_q, the defining field of PG(2, q), is determined. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 18: 224–236, 2010     

On the classification of semifield flocks

A classical lemma of Weil is used to characterise quadratic polynomials f with coefficients GF(qⁿ), q odd, with the property that f(x) is a non-zero square for all x∈GF(q). This characterisation is used to prove the main theorem which states that there are no subplanes of order q contained in the set of internal points of a conic in PG(2,qⁿ) for q?4n²−8n+2. As a corollary to this theorem it then follows that the only semifield flocks of the quadratic cone of PG(3,qⁿ) for those q exceeding this bound are the linear flocks and the Kantor-Knuth semifield flocks.     

A remark on symplectic spreads

We first note that each element of a symplectic spread of PG(2n − 1, 2 ^r ) either intersects a suitable nonsingular quadric in a subspace of dimension n − 2 or is contained in it, then we prove that this property characterises symplectic spreads of PG(2n − 1, 2 ^r ). As an application, we show that a translation plane of order q ⁿ , q even, with kernel containing GF(q), is defined by a symplectic spread if and only if it contains a maximal arc of the type constructed by Thas (Europ J Combin 1:189–192, 1980).     

Orthogonal packings inPG(5, 2)

Aspread inPG(n, q) is a set of lines which partitions the point set. A packing inPG(n, q) (n odd) is a partition of the lines into spreads. Two packings ofPG(n, q) are calledorthogonal if and only if any two spreads, one from each packing, have at most one line in common. Recently, R. D. Baker has shown the existence of a pair of orthogonal packings inPG(5, 2). In this paper we enumerate all packings inPG(5, 2) having both an automorphism of order 31 and the Frobenius automorphism. We find all pairs of orthogonal packings of the above type and display a set of six mutually orthogonal packings. Previously the largest set of orthogonal packings known inPG(5, 2) was two.     

On the maximality of linear codes

We show that if a linear code admits an extension, then it necessarily admits a linear extension. There are many linear codes that are known to admit no linear extensions. Our result implies that these codes are in fact maximal. We are able to characterize maximal linear (n, k, d) _q -codes as complete (weighted) (n, n − d)-arcs in PG(k − 1, q). At the same time our results sharply limit the possibilities for constructing long non-linear codes. The central ideas to our approach are the Bruen-Silverman model of linear codes, and some well known results on the theory of directions determined by affine point-sets in PG(k, q).      

On the code generated by the incidence matrix of points and hyperplanes in <Emphasis Type="Italic">PG</Emphasis>(<Emphasis Type="Italic">n</Emphasis>,<Emphasis Type="Italic">q</Emphasis>) and its dual

In this paper, we study the p-ary linear code C(PG(n,q)), q = p ^h , p prime, h ≥ 1, generated by the incidence matrix of points and hyperplanes of a Desarguesian projective space PG(n,q), and its dual code. We link the codewords of small weight of this code to blocking sets with respect to lines in PG(n,q) and we exclude all possible codewords arising from small linear blocking sets. We also look at the dual code of C(PG(n,q)) and we prove that finding the minimum weight of the dual code can be reduced to finding the minimum weight of the dual code of points and lines in PG(2,q). We present an improved upper bound on this minimum weight and we show that we can drop the divisibility condition on the weight of the codewords in Sachar’s lower bound (Geom Dedicata 8:407–415, 1979). G. Van de Voorde’s research was supported by the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen).     

Symplectic semifield spreads of <Emphasis Type="Italic">PG</Emphasis>(5, <Emphasis Type="Italic">q</Emphasis>) and the veronese surface

In this paper we show that starting from a symplectic semifield spread S{\mathcal{S}} of PG(5, q), q odd, another symplectic semifield spread of PG(5, q) can be obtained, called the symplectic dual of S{\mathcal{S}}, and we prove that the symplectic dual of a Desarguesian spread of PG(5, q) is the symplectic semifield spread arising from a generalized twisted field. Also, we construct a new symplectic semifield spread of PG(5, q) (q = s ², s odd), we describe the associated commutative semifield and deal with the isotopy issue for this example. Finally, we determine the nuclei of the commutative pre-semifields constructed by Zha et al. (Finite Fields Appl 15(2):125–133, 2009).     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">mth</Emphasis>-Root subgeometry partitions

New subgeometry partitions of PG(n − 1, q ^m ) by subgeometries isomorphic to PG(n − 1, q) are constructed.      

Subregular Spreads of Hermitian Unitals

In this paper, we consider the problem of constructing partitions of the points of a Hermitian unital into pairwise disjoint blocks, commonly known as spreads. We generalize a construction of Baker et al. (In Finite Geometry and Combinatorics, Vol. 191 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Not Ser., pages 17–30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.) to provide a new infinite family of spreads. Morover, we develop a structural connection between these new spreads of the Hermitian unital in PG(2, q²) and the subregular spreads of PG(3, q), allowing us to christen a new “subregular” family of spreads in the Hermitian unital in PG(2, q²).     

Maximal partial spreads in PG (3, q)

We transfer the whole geometry of PG(3, q) over a non-singular quadric Q_4,q of PG(4, q) mapping suitably PG(3, q) over Q_4,q. More precisely the points of PG(3, q) are the lines of Q_4,q; the lines of PG(3, q) are the tangent cones of Q_4,q and the reguli of the hyperbolic quadrics hyperplane section of Q_4,q. A plane of PG(3, q) is the set of lines of Q_4,q meeting a fixed line of Q_4,q. We remark that this representation is valid also for a projective space over any field K and we apply the above representation to construct maximal partial spreads in PG(3, q). For q even we get new cardinalities for For q odd the cardinalities are partially known.     

Blocking sets in PG(2, q n ) from cones of PG(2n, q)

Let Ω and be a subset of Σ = PG(2n−1,q) and a subset of PG(2n,q) respectively, with Σ ⊂ PG(2n,q) and . Denote by K the cone of vertex Ω and base and consider the point set B defined by