Graphs having distance-n domination number half their order

For any positive integer n and any graph G a set D of vertices of G is a distance-n dominating set, if every vertex vV(G)−D has exactly distance n to at least one vertex in D. The distance-n domination number γ_=n(G) is the smallest number of vertices in any distance-n dominating set. If G is a graph of order p and each vertex in G has distance n to at least one vertex in G, then the distance-n domination number has the upper bound p/2 as Ore's upper bound on the classical domination number. In this paper, a characterization is given for graphs having distance-n domination number equal to half their order, when the diameter is greater or equal 2n−1. With this result we confirm a conjecture of Boland, Haynes, and Lawson.     

A comparison between the metric dimension and zero forcing number of trees and unicyclic graphs

The metric dimension dim(G)of a graph G is the minimum number of vertices such that every vertex of G is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the chosen vertices.The zero forcing number Z(G)of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a set S of black vertices(whereas vertices in V(G)\S are colored white)such that V(G)is turned black after finitely many applications of"the color-change rule":a white vertex is converted black if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex.We show that dim(T)≤Z(T)for a tree T,and that dim(G)≤Z(G)+1 if G is a unicyclic graph;along the way,we characterize trees T attaining dim(T)=Z(T).For a general graph G,we introduce the"cycle rank conjecture".We conclude with a proof of dim(T)-2≤dim(T+e)≤dim(T)+1 for e∈E(T).     

Block graphs with unique minimum dominating sets

For any graph G a set D of vertices of G is a dominating set, if every vertex vV(G)−D has at least one neighbor in D. The domination number γ(G) is the smallest number of vertices in any dominating set. In this paper, a characterization is given for block graphs having a unique minimum dominating set. With this result, we generalize a theorem of Gunther, Hartnell, Markus and Rall for trees.     

Total domination dot-stable graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. Two vertices of G are said to be dotted (identified) if they are combined to form one vertex whose open neighborhood is the union of their neighborhoods minus themselves. We note that dotting any pair of vertices cannot increase the total domination number. Further we show it can decrease the total domination number by at most 2. A graph is total domination dot-stable if dotting any pair of adjacent vertices leaves the total domination number unchanged. We characterize the total domination dot-stable graphs and give a sharp upper bound on their total domination number. We also characterize the graphs attaining this bound.     

A survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. In this paper, we offer a survey of selected recent results on total domination in graphs.     

Augmenting a graph of minimum degree 2 to have two disjoint total dominating sets

A total dominating set of a graph is a set of vertices such that every vertex is adjacent to a vertex in the set. We show that given a graph of order n with minimum degree at least 2, one can add at most edges such that the resulting graph has two disjoint total dominating sets, and this bound is best possible.     

Least domination in a graph

The least domination number γ_L of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G whose domination number is minimum. The least point covering number _L of G is the minimum cardinality of a total point cover (point cover including every isolated vertex of G) whose total point covering number is minimum. We prove a conjecture of Sampathkumar saying that in every connected graph of order n 2. We disprove another one saying that γ_{L L} in every graph but instead of it, we establish the best possible inequality . Finally, in relation with the minimum cardinality γ_t of a dominating set without isolated vertices (total dominating set), we prove that the ratio γ_L/γ_t can be in general arbitrarily large, but remains bounded by if we restrict ourselves to the class of trees.     

The generalized S-graphs of diameter 3

A graph is called a generalized S-graph if for every vertex v of G there exists exactly one vertex which is more remote from v than every vertex adjacent to v. A generalized S-graph of diameter 3 is called reducible if there is a pair of diametrical vertices v and such that v is also a generalized S-graph of diameter 3. Here we determine all irreducible generalized S-graphs of diameter 3.     

Total domination critical and stable graphs upon edge removal

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination edge critical if the removal of any arbitrary edge increases the total domination number. On the other hand, a graph is total domination edge stable if the removal of any arbitrary edge has no effect on the total domination number. In this paper, we characterize total domination edge critical graphs. We also investigate various properties of total domination edge stable graphs.     

A note on transitive orientations with maximum sets of sources and sinks

Given a transitive orientation of a comparability graph G, a vertex of G is a source (sink) if it has indegree (outdegree) zero in , respectively. A source set of G is a subset of vertices formed by sources of some transitive orientation . A pair of subsets S,TV(G) is a source–sink pair of G when the vertices of S and T are sources and sinks, of some transitive orientation , respectively. We describe algorithms for finding a transitive orientation with a maximum source–sink pair in a comparability graph. The algorithms are applications of modular decomposition and are all of linear-time complexity.     

极大全控点临界图

图G的点集S如果满足:VG-S(或VG)中每个点相邻于S中的某个点(或而不是它本身),则称点集S是一个控制集(或全控制集).图G的所有控制集(或全控制集)中最小基数的控制集(或全控制集)中的点数,称为控制数(或全控数),记为γ(G)(或γt(G)).在这篇文章中我们特征化γt-临界图且满足γt(G)=n-Δ(G)的图特征,这回答了Goddard等人提出的一个问题.     

On the Ratio Between 2-Domination and Total Outer-Independent Domination Numbers of Trees

A 2-dominating set of a graph G is a set D of vertices of G such that every vertex of V(G)\D has at least two neighbors in D.A total outer-independent dominating set of a graph G is a set D of vertices of G such that every vertex of G has a neighbor in D,and the set V(G)\D is independent.The 2-domination(total outer-independent domination,respectively)number of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a 2-dominating(total outer-independent dominating,respectively)set of G.We investigate the ratio between2-domination and total outer-independent domination numbers of trees.     

The integrity of a cubic graph

Integrity, a measure of network reliability, is defined as

where G is a graph with vertex set V and m(G−S) denotes the order of the largest component of G−S. We prove an upper bound of the following form on the integrity of any cubic graph with n vertices:

Moreover, there exist an infinite family of connected cubic graphs whose integrity satisfies a linear lower bound I(G)>βn for some constant β. We provide a value for β, but it is likely not best possible. To prove the upper bound we first solve the following extremal problem. What is the least number of vertices in a cubic graph whose removal results in an acyclic graph? The solution (with a few minor exceptions) is that n/3 vertices suffice and this is best possible.     

On the bounded domination number of tournaments

In a simple digraph, a star of degree t is a union of t edges with a common tail. The k-domination number γ_k(G) of digraph G is the minimum number of stars of degree at most k needed to cover the vertex set. We prove that γ_k(T)=n/(k+1) when T is a tournament with n14k lg k vertices. This improves a result of Chen, Lu and West. We also give a short direct proof of the result of E. Szekeres and G. Szekeres that every n-vertex tournament is dominated by at most lg n−lglg n+2 vertices.     

Total domination changing and stable graphs upon vertex removal

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination vertex removal stable if the removal of an arbitrary vertex leaves the total domination number unchanged. On the other hand, a graph is total domination vertex removal changing if the removal of an arbitrary vertex changes the total domination number. In this paper, we study total domination vertex removal changing and stable graphs.     

Total domination stable graphs upon edge addition

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination edge addition stable if the addition of an arbitrary edge has no effect on the total domination number. In this paper, we characterize total domination edge addition stable graphs. We determine a sharp upper bound on the total domination number of total domination edge addition stable graphs, and we determine which combinations of order and total domination number are attainable. We finish this work with an investigation of claw-free total domination edge addition stable graphs.     

Strong equality of domination parameters in trees

We study the concept of strong equality of domination parameters. Let P₁ and P₂ be properties of vertex subsets of a graph, and assume that every subset of V(G) with property P₂ also has property P₁. Let ψ₁(G) and ψ₂(G), respectively, denote the minimum cardinalities of sets with properties P₁ and P₂, respectively. Then ψ₁(G)ψ₂(G). If ψ₁(G)=ψ₂(G) and every ψ₁(G)-set is also a ψ₂(G)-set, then we say ψ₁(G) strongly equals ψ₂(G), written ψ₁(G)≡ψ₂(G). We provide a constructive characterization of the trees T such that γ(T)≡i(T), where γ(T) and i(T) are the domination and independent domination numbers, respectively. A constructive characterization of the trees T for which γ(T)=γ_t(T), where γ_t(T) denotes the total domination number of T, is also presented.     

A note on balance vertices in trees

The notion of balanced bipartitions of the vertices in a tree T was introduced and studied by Reid (Networks 34 (1999) 264). Reid proved that the set of balance vertices of a tree T consists of a single vertex or two adjacent vertices. In this note, we give a simple proof of that result.     

Wings and perfect graphs

An edge uv of a graph G is called a wing if there exists a chordless path with vertices u, v, x, y and edges uv, vx, xy. The wing-graph W(G) of a graph G is a graph having the same vertex set as G; uv is an edge in W(G) if and only if uv is a wing in G. A graph G is saturated if G is isomorphic to W(G). A star-cutset in a graph G is a non-empty set of vertices such that G — C is disconnected and some vertex in C is adjacent to all the remaining vertices in C. V. Chvátal proposed to call a graph unbreakable if neither G nor its complement contain a star-cutset. We establish several properties of unbreakable graphs using the notions of wings and saturation. In particular, we obtain seven equivalent versions of the Strong Perfect Graph Conjecture.     

Number of minimum vertex cuts in transitive graphs

Let G be a k-regular vertex transitive graph with connectivity κ(G)=k and let m_k(G) be the number of vertex cuts with k vertices. Define m(n,k)=min{m_k(G): GT_n,k}, where T_n,k denotes the set of all k-regular vertex transitive graphs on n vertices with κ(G)=k. In this paper, we determine the exact values of m(n,k).