On some results of Hua in short intervals

In this note, we prove some results of Hua in short intervals. For example, each sufficiently large integer N satisfying some congruence conditions can be written as

$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {N = p_1^2 + p_2^2 + p_3^2 + p_4^2 + {p^k}}, \hfill \\ {\left| {{p_j} - \sqrt {N/5} } \right| \leqslant U,\left| {p - {{\left( {N/5} \right)}^{\tfrac{1}{k}}}} \right|\leqslant UN - \tfrac{1}{2} + \tfrac{1}{k},j = 1,2,3,4,} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $

where \( U = N\tfrac{1}{2} - \eta + \varepsilon \) with \( \eta = \frac{2}{{\kappa \left( {K + 1} \right)\left( {{K^2} + 2} \right)}} \) and \( K = {2^{k - 1}},k\geqslant 3. \)

     

On the order of the error function of the square-full integers

LetL(x) denote the number of square full integers ≤x. By a square-full integer, we mean a positive integer all of whose prime factors have multiplicity at least two. It is well known that $$\left. {L(x)} \right| \sim \frac{{\zeta ({3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2})}}{{\zeta (3)}}x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} + \frac{{\zeta ({2 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3})}}{{\zeta (2)}}x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}} ,$$ where ζ(s) denotes the Riemann Zeta function. Let Δ(x) denote the error function in the asymptotic formula forL(x). On the basis of the Riemann hypothesis (R.H.), it is known that \(\Delta (x) = O(x^{\tfrac{{13}}{{81}} + \varepsilon } )\) for every ε>0. In this paper, we prove the following results on the assumption of R.H.: (1) $$\frac{1}{x}\int\limits_1^x {\Delta (t)dt} = O(x^{\tfrac{1}{{12}} + \varepsilon } ),$$ (2) $$\int\limits_1^x {\frac{{\Delta (t)}}{t}\log } ^{v - 1} \left( {\frac{x}{t}} \right) = O(x^{\tfrac{1}{{12}} + \varepsilon } )$$ for any integer ν≥1. In fact, we prove some general results and deduce the above from them. On the basis of (1) and (2) above, we conjecture that \(\Delta (x) = O(x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {12}}} \right. \kern-0em} {12}} + \varepsilon } )\) under the assumption of R.H.     

On the normalizing multiplier of the generalized Jackson kernel

We consider the question of evaluating the normalizing multiplier $$\gamma _{n,k} = \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{ - \pi }^\pi {\left( {\frac{{sin\tfrac{{nt}}{2}}}{{sin\tfrac{t}{2}}}} \right)^{2k} dt} $$ for the generalized Jackson kernel J _n,k (t). We obtain the explicit formula $$\gamma _{n,k} = 2\sum\limits_{p = 0}^{\left[ {k - \tfrac{k}{n}} \right]} {( - 1)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {2k} \\ p \\ \end{array} } \right)\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {k(n + 1) - np - 1} \\ {k(n - 1) - np} \\ \end{array} } \right)} $$ and the representation $$\gamma _{n,k} = \sqrt {\frac{{24}}{\pi }} \cdot \frac{{(n - 1)^{2k - 1} }}{{\sqrt {2k - 1} }}\left[ {1\frac{1}{8} \cdot \frac{1}{{2k - 1}} + \omega (n,k)} \right],$$ , where $$\left| {\omega (n,k)} \right| < \frac{4}{{(2k - 1)\sqrt {ln(2k - 1)} }} + \sqrt {12\pi } \cdot \frac{{k^{\tfrac{3}{2}} }}{{n - 1}}\left( {1 + \frac{1}{{n - 1}}} \right)^{2k - 2} .$$ .     

Some approximation theorems for modified Bernstein-Durrmeyer operators

The modified Bernstein-Durrmeyer operators discussed in this paper are given byM_nf≡M_n(f,x)=(n+2)P_(n,k)∫_0~1p_n+1.k(t)f(t)dt,whereWe will show,for 0<α<1 and 1≤p≤∞     

Generalized Knopp identities for homogeneous Hardy sums and Cochrane-Hardy sums

Let q, h, a, b be integers with q > 0. The classical and the homogeneous Dedekind sums are defined by $$s(h,q) = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^q {\left( {\left( {{j \over q}} \right)} \right)\left( {\left( {{{hj} \over q}} \right)} \right),{\rm{ }}s(a,b,q) = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^q {\left( {\left( {{{aj} \over q}} \right)} \right)\left( {\left( {{{bj} \over q}} \right)} \right),} } $$ respectively, where $((x)) = \left\{ \begin{gathered} x - [x] - \tfrac{1} {2},if x is not an integer; \hfill \\ 0,if x is an integer. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right. $ The Knopp identities for the classical and the homogeneous Dedekind sum were the following: $$\sum\limits_{d|n} {\sum\limits_{r = 1}^d {s\left( {{n \over d}a + rq,dq} \right) = \sigma (n)s(a,q),} } $$ $$\sum\limits_{d|n} {\sum\limits_{{r_1} = 1}^d {\sum\limits_{{r_2} = 1}^d s \left( {{n \over d}a + {r_1}q,{n \over d}b + {r_2}q,dq} \right) = n\sigma (n)s(a,b,q),} } $$ where σ(n) =Σ _d|n d. In this paper generalized homogeneous Hardy sums and Cochrane-Hardy sums are defined, and their arithmetic properties are studied. Generalized Knopp identities for homogeneous Hardy sums and Cochrane-Hardy sums are given.     

On some new identities for the Fibonomial coefficients

Let F _n be the nth Fibonacci number. The Fibonomial coefficients \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_F\) are defined for n ≥ k > 0 as follows $$\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_F = \frac{{F_n F_{n - 1} \cdots F_{n - k + 1} }} {{F_1 F_2 \cdots F_k }},$$ with \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ 0 \\ \end{array} } \right]_F = 1\) and \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_F = 0\) . In this paper, we shall provide several identities among Fibonomial coefficients. In particular, we prove that $$\sum\limits_{j = 0}^{4l + 1} {\operatorname{sgn} (2l - j)\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {4l + 1} \\ j \\ \end{array} } \right]_F F_{n - j} = \frac{{F_{2l - 1} }} {{F_{4l + 1} }}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {4l + 1} \\ {2l} \\ \end{array} } \right]_F F_{n - 4l - 1} ,}$$ holds for all non-negative integers n and l.     

Über die Primteiler-Anzahl ω(n)

It is shown by analytical means that, if one assumes the Riemann hypothesis, the asymptotic formula $$\sum\limits_{n \leqslant x} {\omega (n) = x 1n1n } x + B - x\int_l^{x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} } {\frac{{\{ t\} }}{{t^2 (1n x - 1n t)}}dt + O(x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2} + \varepsilon } )} $$ holds. This improves a result ofB. Saffari, who got a weaker error term by using the Dirichlet “hyperbola method”. The above formula, in turn, implies the Riemann hypothesis.     

A note on periodic solutions of a differential equation with two parameters

In [1] (p. 215), the authors Andronov, Leontovich-Andronova, Gordon, and Maier, consider the following equation: $$\left\{ \begin{gathered} \tfrac{{dx}}{{dt}} = y, \hfill \\ \tfrac{{dy}}{{dt}} = x + x^2 - \left( {\varepsilon _1 + \varepsilon _2 x} \right)y, \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$ whereε ₁ andε ₂ are real constants andε ₁ andε ₂ are not both zero. They proved that there are no non-trivial periodic solutions except possibly for the case $0< \tfrac{{\varepsilon _1 }}{{\varepsilon _2 }}< \tfrac{3}{2}$ . They left that case as an open problem. In this note we prove that there are indeed no non-trivial periodic solutions in the case $0< \tfrac{{\varepsilon _1 }}{{\varepsilon _2 }}< \tfrac{3}{2}$ either. Our method of proof consists essentially of constructing a Dulac function (see [6] and [9]) and using the conception of Duff's rotated vector field (see [4], [7], [8], [10], and [11]).     

Short exponential sums with a non-integer power of a natural number

The following nontrivial estimate is obtained for short exponential sums: $$Sc\left( {\alpha ,x,y} \right) = \sum\limits_{x - y < n \leqslant x} {e\left( {\alpha \left[ {n^c } \right]} \right) < < y\ln ^A x,}$$ where $y \geqslant x^{\tfrac{1} {2}} \ln ^A x,x^{1 - c} y^{ - 1} \ln ^A x \leqslant \left| \alpha \right| \leqslant 0.5$ , c > 2 and ∥c∥ ≥ δ, A is a fixed positive number, and $\delta = \delta \left( {x,c,A} \right) = \left( {2^{\left[ c \right] + 1} - 1} \right)\left( {A + 2.5} \right) \cdot \frac{{\ln \ln x}} {{\ln x}}$ .     

Lower and upper bounds of Dirichlet eigenvalues for totally characteristic degenerate elliptic operators

Let λkbe the k-th Dirichlet eigenvalue of totally characteristic degenerate elliptic operator-ΔB defined on a stretched cone B0 ■ [0,1) × X with boundary on {x1 = 0}. More precisely,ΔB=(x1αx1)2+ α2x2+ + α2xnis also called the cone Laplacian. In this paper,by using Mellin-Fourier transform,we prove thatλk Cnk2 n for any k 1,where Cn=(nn+2)(2π)2(|B0|Bn)-2n,which gives the lower bounds of the Dirchlet eigenvalues of-ΔB. On the other hand,by using the Rayleigh-Ritz inequality,we deduce the upper bounds ofλk,i.e.,λk+1 1 +4n k2/nλ1. Combining the lower and upper bounds of λk,we can easily obtain the lower bound for the first Dirichlet eigenvalue λ1 Cn(1 +4n)-12n2.     

Exact Non-Self-Similar Solutions of the Equation $$u_t = \Delta \ln u$$

In this paper, we obtain new exact non-self-similar solutions of the nonlinear diffusion equation $$\begin{gathered} {\text{ }}u_t = \Delta \ln u, \hfill \\ u \triangleq u\left( {x,t} \right):\Omega \times \mathbb{R}^ + \to \mathbb{R},{\text{ }} x \in \mathbb{R}^n , \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ where $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n $ is the domain and $\mathbb{R}^ + = \left\{ {t:0 \leqslant t < + \infty } \right\},{\text{ }}u\left( {x,t} \right) \geqslant 0$ is the temperature of the medium.     

On the order of the error function of the square-full integers,II

LetL(x) denote the number of square-full integers not exceedingx. It is well-known that $$L\left( x \right) \sim \frac{{\zeta \left( {{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} \right)}}{{\zeta \left( 3 \right)}}x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} + \frac{{\zeta \left( {{2 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}} \right)}}{{\zeta \left( 2 \right)}}x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}} ,$$ whereζ(s) denotes the Riemann Zeta function, LetΔ(x) denote the error function in the asymptotic formula forL(x). On the assumption of the Riemann hypothesis (R.H.), it is known that $$\Delta x = O\left( {x^{13/81 + 8} } \right)$$ for everyε > 0. In this paper, we prove on the assumption of R.H. that $$\frac{1}{x}\int\limits_x^1 {\left| {\Delta \left( t \right)} \right|dt = O\left( {x^{1/10 + ^8 } } \right)} .$$ In fact, we prove a more general result. We conjecture that $$\Delta x = O\left( {x^{1/10 + ^8 } } \right)$$ under the assumption of the R.H.     

Pointwise estimates for Lagrange interpolation polynomials

Let f ∈ C[?1, 1]. Let the approximation rate of Lagrange interpolation polynomial of f based on the nodes $ \left\{ {\cos \frac{{2k - 1}} {{2n}}\pi } \right\} \cup \{ - 1,1\} $ be Δ _{n + 2}(f, x). In this paper we study the estimate of Δ _{n + 2}(f,x), that keeps the interpolation property. As a result we prove that $$ \Delta _{n + 2} (f,x) = \mathcal{O}(1)\left\{ {\omega \left( {f,\frac{{\sqrt {1 - x^2 } }} {n}} \right)\left| {T_n (x)} \right|\ln (n + 1) + \omega \left( {f,\frac{{\sqrt {1 - x^2 } }} {n}\left| {T_n (x)} \right|} \right)} \right\}, $$ where T _n (x) = cos (n arccos x) is the Chebeyshev polynomial of first kind. Also, if f ∈ C ^r [?1, 1] with r ≧ 1, then $$ \Delta _{n + 2} (f,x) = \mathcal{O}(1)\left\{ {\frac{{\sqrt {1 - x^2 } }} {{n^r }}\left| {T_n (x)} \right|\omega \left( {f^{(r)} ,\frac{{\sqrt {1 - x^2 } }} {n}} \right)\left( {\left( {\sqrt {1 - x^2 } + \frac{1} {n}} \right)^{r - 1} \ln (n + 1) + 1} \right)} \right\}. $$      

On the asymptotic behaviour of the ideal counting function in quadratic number fields

LetK be a quadratic number field with discriminantD and denote byF(n) the number of integral ideals with norm equal ton. Forr≥1 the following formula is proved $$\sum\limits_{n \leqslant x} {F(n)F(n + r) = M_K (r)x + E_K (x,r).} $$ HereM _k (r) is an explicitly determined function ofr which depends onK, and for every ε>0 the error term is bounded by \(|E_K (x,r)|<< |D|^{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2} + \varepsilon } x^{{5 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {5 6}} \right. \kern-0em} 6} + \varepsilon } \) uniformly for \(r<< |D|^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}} x^{{5 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {5 6}} \right. \kern-0em} 6}} \) Moreover,E _k (x,r) is small on average, i.e \(\int_X^{2X} {|E_K (x,r)|^2 dx}<< |D|^{4 + \varepsilon } X^{{5 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {5 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2} + \varepsilon } \) uniformly for \(r<< |D|X^{{3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 4}} \right. \kern-0em} 4}} \) .     

Positive solutions to m-point boundary value problem of fractional differential equation

In this paper, we study the multiplicity of positive solutions to the following m-point boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations: Dqu(t) + f(t, u(t)) = 0, 0 < t < 1, u(0) = 0, u(1) =sum (μiDpu(t)|t = ξi ) from i =1 to ∞ m-2, where q ∈R , 1 相似文献   

Some consequences of the Lindelöf conjecture

Suppose that the Lindelöf conjecture is valid in the following quantitative form: $$|\zeta (\frac{1}{2} + it)| \leqslant c_0 |t|^{\varepsilon (|t|)} $$ , where ε(t) is a monotone decreasing function, $\varepsilon (2t) \geqslant \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon (t),\varepsilon (t) \geqslant \tfrac{1}{{\sqrt {log t} }}$ . Then it is proved that for |t|≥T₀ the disk $\{ s:|s - \tfrac{1}{2} - it| \leqslant v\} $ contains at most 20v log |t| zeros of ζ(s) if $\tfrac{1}{2} \geqslant v \geqslant \sqrt {\varepsilon (t)} $ . There exists an absolute constant A such that for |t|≥T₁ the disk $\{ s:|s - \tfrac{1}{2} - it| \leqslant A\varepsilon ^{\tfrac{1}{3}} (t)\} $ contains at least one zero of ζ(s). Bibliography: 2 titles.     

A generalized Cole-Hopf transformation for a two-dimensional burgers equation with a variable coefficient

The direct method is applied to the two dimensional Burgers equation with a variable coefficient (u _t + uu _x ? u _xx ) _x + s(t)u _yy = 0 is transformed into the Riccati equation $H' - \tfrac{1} {2}H^2 + \left( {\tfrac{\rho } {2} - 1} \right)H = 0$ via the ansatz $u\left( {x,y,t} \right) = \tfrac{1} {{\sqrt t }}H(\rho ) + \tfrac{y} {{2\sqrt t }}\rho \left( {x,y,t} \right) = \tfrac{x} {{\sqrt t }} - y$ , provided that s(t) = t ^?3/2. Further, a generalized Cole-Hopf transformations $u\left( {x,y,t} \right) = \tfrac{y} {{2\sqrt t }} - \tfrac{2} {{\sqrt t }}\tfrac{{U_\rho (\rho ,r)}} {{U(\rho ,r)}}$ , $\rho \left( {x,y,t} \right) = \tfrac{x} {{\sqrt t }} - y$ , r(t) = log t is derived to linearize (u _t + uu _x ? u _xx ) _x + t ^?3/2 u _yy to the parabolic equation $U_r = U_{\rho \rho } + \left( {\tfrac{\rho } {2} - 1} \right)U_\rho$ .     

Blow-up,quenching, aggregation and collapse in a chemotaxis model with reproduction term

In this paper,we consider the following chemotaxis model with ratio-dependent logistic reaction term u/t=D▽(▽u-u▽ω/ω)+u(α-bu/ω),(x,t)∈QT,ω/t=βu-δω,(x,t)∈QT,u▽㏑(u/w)·=0,x ∈Ω,0tT,u(x,0)=u0(x)0,x ∈,w(x,0)=w0(x)0,x ∈,It is shown that the solution to the problem exists globally if b+β≥0 and will blow up or quench if b+β0 by means of function transformation and comparison method.Various asymptotic behavior related to different coefficients and initial data is also discussed.     

Estimation of the remainder of a cubature formula on a Chebyshev grid

Let C(Q) denote the space of continuous functions f(x, y) in the square Q = [?1, 1] × [?1, 1] with the norm $\begin{gathered} \left\| f \right\| = \max \left| {f(x,y)} \right|, \hfill \\ (x,y) \in Q. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $ On a Chebyshev grid, a cubature formula of the form $\int\limits_{ - 1}^1 {\int\limits_{ - 1}^1 {\frac{1} {{\sqrt {(1 - x^2 )(1 - y^2 )} }}f(x,y)dxdy = \frac{{\pi ^2 }} {{mn}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^m {f\left( {\cos \frac{{2i - 1}} {{2n}}\pi ,\cos \frac{{2j - 1}} {{2m}}\pi } \right)} + R_{m,n} (f)} } } $ is considered in some class H(r ₁, r ₂) of functions f ?? C(Q) defined by a generalized shift operator. The remainder R _{m, n} (f) is proved to satisfy the estimate $\mathop {\sup }\limits_{f \in H(r_1 ,r_2 )} \left| {R_{m,n} (f)} \right| = O(n^{ - r_1 + 1} + m^{ - r_2 + 1} ), $ where r ₁, r ₂ > 1; ??^?1 ?? n/m ?? ?? with ?? > 0; and the constant in O(1) depends on ??.     

Spectral method for solving nonlinear wave equations

In this paper,we consider the following nonlinear wave equations:(■~2φ)/(■t~2)-(■~2φ)/(■x~2)+μ~2φ+v~2x~2φ+f(|φ|~2)φ=0,(■~2x)/(■t~2-(■~2X)/(■X~2)+α~2x+α~2x+v~2x|φ|~2+g(X)=0with the periodic-initial conditions:φ(x-π,t)=φ(x+π,t),x(x-π,t)=x(x+v,t),φ(x,0)=■_0(x),φ_t(x,0)=■_1(x),X(x,0)=■_0(x),x_t(x,0)=■_1(x),-∞相似文献