Input–output substitutability and strongly monotonic p-norm least distance DEA measures

In DEA, there are two frameworks for efficiency assessment and targeting: the greatest and the least distance framework. The greatest distance framework provides us with the efficient targets that are determined by the farthest projections to the assessed decision making unit via maximization of the p-norm relative to either the strongly efficient frontier or the weakly efficient frontier. Non-radial measures belonging to the class of greatest distance measures are the slacks-based measure (SBM) and the range-adjusted measure (RAM). Whereas these greatest distance measures have traditionally been utilized because of their computational ease, least distance projections are quite often more appropriate than greatest distance projections from the perspective of managers of decision-making units because closer efficient targets may be attained with less effort. In spite of this desirable feature of the least distance framework, the least distance (in) efficiency versions of the additive measure, SBM and RAM do not even satisfy weak monotonicity. In this study, therefore, we introduce and investigate least distance p-norm inefficiency measures that satisfy strong monotonicity over the strongly efficient frontier. In order to develop these measures, we extend a free disposable set and introduce a tradeoff set that implements input–output substitutability.     

Computational strategy for Russell measure in DEA: Second-order cone programming

In aggregation for data envelopment analysis (DEA), a jointly measured efficiency score among inputs and outputs is desirable in performance analysis. A separate treatment between output-oriented efficiency and input-oriented efficiency is often needed in the conventional radial DEA models. Such radial measures usually need to measure both that a current performance attains an efficiency frontier and that all the slacks are zero on optimality. In the analytical framework of the radial measure, Russell measure is proposed to deal with such a difficulty. A major difficulty associated with the Russell measure is that it is modeled by a nonlinear programming formulation. Hence, a conventional linear programming algorithm, usually applied for DEA, cannot solve the Russell measure. This study newly proposes a reformulation of the Russell measure by a second-order cone programming (SOCP) model and applies the primal–dual interior point algorithm to solve the Russell measure.     

A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we will propose a slacks-based measure (SBM) of efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This scalar measure deals directly with the input excesses and the output shortfalls of the decision making unit (DMU) concerned. It is units invariant and monotone decreasing with respect to input excess and output shortfall. Furthermore, this measure is determined only by consulting the reference-set of the DMU and is not affected by statistics over the whole data set. The new measure has a close connection with other measures proposed so far, e.g., Charnes–Cooper–Rhodes (CCR), Banker–Charnes–Cooper (BCC) and the Russell measure of efficiency. The dual side of this model can be interpreted as profit maximization, in contrast to the ratio maximization of the CCR model. Numerical experiments show its validity as an efficiency measurement tool and its compatibility with other measures of efficiency.     

A Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been proven as an excellent data-oriented performance evaluation method when multiple inputs and outputs are present in a set of peer decision-making units (DMUs). Several efficiency measures have been proposed in the DEA literature, see, for instances, radial efficiency measure of Charnes et al. (CCR)(A. Charnes. W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2, 429–444), Russell graph measure (J.T. Russell, and R. Sirvant. 1999. An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 115, pp. 596–607) and slack-based measure of Tone (K. Tone, 2001. A slack-based measure of efficiency in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, p. 498–509). In this article, we will propose an Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency. Then, in order to discriminate the performance of efficient DMUs, an alternative super-efficiency DEA model is proposed. The applicability of the models developed is illustrated in the context of the analysis of gas companies performance.     

An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure

The measurement of productive efficiency is an issue of great interest. Since Farrell (Farrell, M.J., 1957. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 120, 253) implemented the first measure of technical efficiency, many researchers have developed new measures or have extended the already existing ones. The beginning of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) meant a new way of empirically measuring productive efficiency. Under some specific technologies, Farrell's measure was implemented giving rise to the first DEA models, CCR (Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429) and BCC (Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1984. Management Science, 1078). The fact that these measures only account for radial inefficiency has motivated the development of the so-called Global Efficiency Measures (GEMs) (Cooper, W.W., Pastor, J.T., 1995. Working Paper, Departamento de Estadı́stica e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain). In this paper we propose a new GEM inspired by the Russell Graph Measure of Technical Efficiency which avoids the computational and interpretative difficulties with this latter measure. Additionally, the new measure satisfies some other desirable properties.     

Relationship between DEA models without explicit inputs and DEA-R models

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is one of often used modeling tools for efficiency and performance evaluation of decision making units. Ratio DEA (DEA-R) is a group of novel mathematical models that combines standard DEA methodology and ratio analysis. The efficiency score given by standard DEA CCR model is less than or equal to that given by DEA-R model. In case of single input or single output the efficiency scores in CCR and DEA-R models are identical. The paper deals with DEA-R models without explicit inputs, i.e. models where only pure outputs or index data are taken into account. A basic DEA-R model without explicit inputs is formulated and a relation between output-oriented DEA models without explicit inputs and output-oriented DEA-R models is analyzed. Central resource allocation and slack-based measure models within DEA-R framework are examined. Finally they are used for projections of decision making units on the efficient frontier. The results of the proposed models are applied for efficiency evaluation of 15 units (Chinese research institutes) and they are discussed.     

Measurement of returns to scale using a non-radial DEA model: A range-adjusted measure approach

This research theoretically explores the measurement of returns to scale (RTS), using a non-radial DEA (data envelopment analysis) model. A range-adjusted measure (RAM) is used as a representative of such non-radial models. Historically, a type of RTS has been discussed within an analytical framework of radial models. The radial-based RTS measurement is replaced by the non-radial RAM/RTS measurement in this study. When discussing the non-radial RAM/RTS measurement, this study finds a problem of multiple projections that cannot be found in the radial measurement. In this research, a new linear programming approach is proposed to identify all efficient DMUs (decision making units) on a reference set. The important feature of the proposed approach is that it can deal with a simultaneous occurrence of (a) multiple reference sets, (b) multiple supporting hyperplanes and (c) multiple projections. All of the three difficulties are handled by the proposed RAM/RTS measurement. In particular, we discuss both when the three different types of multiple solutions occur on the RAM/RTS measurement and how to deal with such difficulties. Our research results make it possible to measure not only the type of RTS but also the magnitude of RTS in the RAM measurement.     

A generalized multiplicative directional distance function for efficiency measurement in DEA

For measuring technical efficiency relative to a log-linear technology, a generalized multiplicative directional distance function (GMDDF) is developed using the framework of multiplicative directional distance function (MDDF). Furthermore, a computational procedure is suggested for its estimation. The GMDDF serves as a comprehensive measure of efficiency in revealing Pareto-efficient targets as it accounts for all possible input and output slacks. This measure satisfies several desirable properties of an ideal efficiency measure such as strong monotonicity, unit invariance, translation invariance, and positive affine transformation invariance. This measure can be easily implemented in any standard DEA software and provides the decision makers with the option of specifying preferable direction vectors for incorporating their decision-making preferences. Finally, to demonstrate the ready applicability of our proposed measure, an illustrative empirical analysis is conducted based on real-life data set of 20 hardware computer companies in India.     

Cost,revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: A directional distance function approach

Estimation of efficiency of firms in a non-competitive market characterized by heterogeneous inputs and outputs along with their varying prices is questionable when factor-based technology sets are used in data envelopment analysis (DEA). In this scenario, a value-based technology becomes an appropriate reference technology against which efficiency can be assessed. In this contribution, the value-based models of Tone (2002) are extended in a directional DEA set up to develop new directional cost- and revenue-based measures of efficiency, which are then decomposed into their respective directional value-based technical and allocative efficiencies. These new directional value-based measures are more general, and include the existing value-based measures as special cases. These measures satisfy several desirable properties of an ideal efficiency measure. These new measures are advantageous over the existing ones in terms of (1) their ability to satisfy the most important property of translation invariance; (2) choices over the use of suitable direction vectors in handling negative data; and (3) flexibility in providing the decision makers with the option of specifying preferable direction vectors to incorporate their preferences. Finally, under the condition of no prior unit price information, a directional value-based measure of profit inefficiency is developed for firms whose underlying objectives are profit maximization. For an illustrative empirical application, our new measures are applied to a real-life data set of 50 US banks to draw inferences about the production correspondence of banking industry.     

Measurement of Returns to Scale and Damages to Scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: How to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs?

Environmental assessment is increasingly important in preventing various types of pollutions. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been long used as an operational performance measure, but we have insufficiently explored the use of DEA for environmental assessment. This study explores a new use of DEA for the environmental assessment in which outputs are classified into desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs. Such an output separation is important in the DEA-based environmental assessment. This study extends the use of DEA to the measurement of both Returns to Scale (RTS) for desirable outputs and Damages to Scale (DTS) for undesirable outputs. A Range-Adjusted Measure (RAM) is used as a DEA model for this study because the non-radial model can easily combine the two types of outputs in a unified treatment. All the mathematical features regarding the RAM-based RTS/DTS measurement are first discussed from the operational and environmental performance in a separate treatment. Then, this study combines the two performance measures as a unified measure. The RAM-based RTS/DTS is mathematically explored from the unified measure for operational and environmental performance.     

Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure

It is important to consider the decision making unit (DMU)'s or decision maker's preference over the potential adjustments of various inputs and outputs when data envelopment analysis (DEA) is employed. On the basis of the so-called Russell measure, this paper develops some weighted non-radial CCR models by specifying a proper set of ‘preference weights’ that reflect the relative degree of desirability of the potential adjustments of current input or output levels. These input or output adjustments can be either less or greater than one; that is, the approach enables certain inputs actually to be increased, or certain outputs actually to be decreased. It is shown that the preference structure prescribes fixed weights (virtual multiplier bounds) or regions that invalidate some virtual multipliers and hence it generates preferred (efficient) input and output targets for each DMU. In addition to providing the preferred target, the approach gives a scalar efficiency score for each DMU to secure comparability. It is also shown how specific cases of our approach handle non-controllable factors in DEA and measure allocative and technical efficiency. Finally, the methodology is applied with the industrial performance of 14 open coastal cities and four special economic zones in 1991 in China. As applied here, the DEA/preference structure model refines the original DEA model's result and eliminates apparently efficient DMUs.     

A new clustering approach using data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we present a new clustering method that involves data envelopment analysis (DEA). The proposed DEA-based clustering approach employs the piecewise production functions derived from the DEA method to cluster the data with input and output items. Thus, each evaluated decision-making unit (DMU) not only knows the cluster that it belongs to, but also checks the production function type that it confronts. It is important for managerial decision-making where decision-makers are interested in knowing the changes required in combining input resources so it can be classified into a desired cluster/class. In particular, we examine the fundamental CCR model to set up the DEA clustering approach. While this approach has been carried for the CCR model, the proposed approach can be easily extended to other DEA models without loss of generality. Two examples are given to explain the use and effectiveness of the proposed DEA-based clustering method.     

环境效率评价方法的比较研究

文章给出了已有文献对环境效率度量的6种DEA(数据包络分析)模型,比较了它们各自对非期望产出处理的特性和缺陷,并以安徽43家企业为例,对其度量结果存在的差异进行了分析和解释.度量结果显示,只有基于松弛测度的SBM模型对企业环境效率的差异识别性较强.     

Variations on the theme of slacks-based measure of efficiency in DEA

In DEA, there are typically two schemes for measuring efficiency of DMUs; radial and non-radial. Radial models assume proportional change of inputs/outputs and usually remaining slacks are not directly accounted for inefficiency. On the other hand, non-radial models deal with slacks of each input/output individually and independently, and integrate them into an efficiency measure, called slacks-based measure (SBM). In this paper, we point out shortcomings of the SBM and propose four variants of the SBM model. The original SBM model evaluates efficiency of DMUs referring to the furthest frontier point within a range. This results in the hardest score for the objective DMU and the projection may go to a remote point on the efficient frontier which may be inappropriate as the reference. In an effort to overcome this shortcoming, we first investigate frontier (facet) structure of the production possibility set. Then we propose Variation I that evaluates each DMU by the nearest point on the same frontier as the SBM found. However, there exist other potential facets for evaluating DMUs. Therefore we propose Variation II that evaluates each DMU from all facets. We then employ clustering methods to classify DMUs into several groups, and apply Variation II within each cluster. This Variation III gives more reasonable efficiency scores with less effort. Lastly we propose a random search method (Variation IV) for reducing the burden of enumeration of facets. The results are approximate but practical in usage.     

Super efficiencies or super inefficiencies? Insights from a joint computation model for slacks-based measures in DEA

The slacks-based measure (SBM) can incorporate input and output slacks that would otherwise be neglected in the classical DEA model. In parallel, the super-efficiency model for SBM (S-SBM) has been developed for the purpose of ranking SBM efficient decision-making units (DMUs). When implementing SBM in conjunction with S-SBM, however, several issues can arise. First, unlike the standard super-efficiency model, S-SBM can only solve for super-efficiency scores but not SBM scores. Second, the S-SBM model may result in weakly efficient reference points. Third, the S-SBM and SBM scores for certain DMUs may be discontinuous with a perturbation to their inputs and outputs, making it hard to interpret and justify the scores in applications and the efficiency scores may be sensitive to small changes/errors in data. Due to this discontinuity, the S-SBM model may overestimate the super-efficiency score. This paper extends the existing SBM approaches and develops a joint model (J-SBM) that addresses the above issues; namely, the J-SBM model can (1) simultaneously compute SBM scores for inefficient DMUs and super-efficiency for efficient DMUs, (2) guarantee the reference points generated by the joint model are Pareto-efficient, and (3) the J-SBM scores of a firm are continuous in the input and output space. Interestingly, the radial DEA efficiency and super-efficiency scores for a DMU are continuous in the input–output space. The J-SBM model combines the merits of the radial and SBM models (i.e., continuity and Pareto-efficiency).     

A generalized model for data envelopment analysis with interval data

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method to estimate the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) performing similar tasks in a production system that consumes multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. So far, a number of DEA models with interval data have been developed. The CCR model with interval data, the BCC model with interval data and the FDH model with interval data are well known as basic DEA models with interval data. In this study, we suggest a model with interval data called interval generalized DEA (IGDEA) model, which can treat the stated basic DEA models with interval data in a unified way. In addition, by establishing the theoretical properties of the relationships among the IGDEA model and those DEA models with interval data, we prove that the IGDEA model makes it possible to calculate the efficiency of DMUs incorporating various preference structures of decision makers.     

Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs

In this paper we consider radial DEA models without inputs (or without outputs), and radial DEA models with a single constant input (or with a single constant output). We demonstrate that (i) a CCR model without inputs (or without outputs) is meaningless; (ii) a CCR model with a single constant input (or with a single constant output) coincides with the corresponding BCC model; (iii) a BCC model with a single constant input (or a single constant output) collapses to a BCC model without inputs (or without outputs); and (iv) all BCC models, including those without inputs (or without outputs), can be condensed to models having one less variable (the radial efficiency score) and one less constraint (the convexity constraint).     

Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data

In data envelopment analysis (DEA) efficient decision making units (DMUs) are of primary importance as they define the efficient frontier. The current paper develops a new sensitivity analysis approach for the basic DEA models, such as, those proposed by Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (CCR), Banker, Charnes and Cooper (BCC) and additive models, when variations in the data are simultaneously considered for all DMUs. By means of modified DEA models, in which the specific DMU under examination is excluded from the reference set, we are able to determine what perturbations of the data can be tolerated before efficient DMUs become inefficient. Our approach generalises the usual sensitivity analysis approach developed in which perturbations of the data are only applied to the test DMU while all the remaining DMUs remain fixed. In our framework data are allowed to vary simultaneously for all DMUs across different subsets of inputs and outputs. We study the relations of the infeasibility of modified DEA models employed and the robustness of DEA models. It is revealed that the infeasibility means stability. The empirical applications demonstrate that DEA efficiency classifications are robust with respect to possible data errors, particularly in the convex DEA case.     

Chinese companies distress prediction: an application of data envelopment analysis

Bankruptcy prediction is a key part in corporate credit risk management. Traditional bankruptcy prediction models employ financial ratios or market prices to predict bankruptcy or financial distress prior to its occurrence. We investigate the predictive accuracy of corporate efficiency measures along with standard financial ratios in predicting corporate distress in Chinese companies. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to measure corporate efficiency. In contrast to previous applications of DEA in credit risk modelling where it was used to generate a single efficiency—Technical Efficiency (TE), we assume Variable Returns to Scale, and decompose TE into Pure Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency. These measures are introduced into Logistic Regression to predict the probability of distress, along with the level of Returns to Scale. Effects of efficiency variables are allowed to vary across industries through the use of interaction terms, while the financial ratios are assumed to have the same effects across all sectors. The results show that the predictive power of the model is improved by this corporate efficiency information.