Signed star domatic number of a graph

Let G be a simple graph without isolated vertices with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)?{−1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function on G if ∑_e∈E(v)f(e)≥1 for every vertex v of G, where E(v)={uv∈E(G)∣u∈N(v)}. A set {f₁,f₂,…,f_d} of signed star dominating functions on G with the property that for each e∈E(G), is called a signed star dominating family (of functions) on G. The maximum number of functions in a signed star dominating family on G is the signed star domatic number of G, denoted by d_SS(G).In this paper we study the properties of the signed star domatic number d_SS(G). In particular, we determine the signed domatic number of some classes of graphs.     

The signed star domination numbers of the Cartesian product graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)→{-1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function of G if for every v∈V(G), where E_G(v)={uv∈E(G)|u∈V(G)}. The minimum of the values of , taken over all signed star dominating functions f on G, is called the signed star domination number of G and is denoted by γ_SS(G). In this paper, a sharp upper bound of γ_SS(G×H) is presented.     

Upper signed domination number

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A signed dominating function on G is a function f:V→{-1,1} such that for each v∈V, where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v. The weight of a signed dominating function f is . A signed dominating function f is minimal if there exists no signed dominating function g such that g≠f and g(v)?f(v) for each v∈V. The upper signed domination number of a graph G, denoted by Γ_s(G), equals the maximum weight of a minimal signed dominating function of G. In this paper, we establish an tight upper bound for Γ_s(G) in terms of minimum degree and maximum degree. Our result is a generalization of those for regular graphs and nearly regular graphs obtained in [O. Favaron, Signed domination in regular graphs, Discrete Math. 158 (1996) 287-293] and [C.X. Wang, J.Z. Mao, Some more remarks on domination in cubic graphs, Discrete Math. 237 (2001) 193-197], respectively.     

On the characterization of trees with signed edge domination numbers 1, 2, 3, or 4

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph. For an edge e of G, the closed edge-neighbourhood of e is the set N[e]={e^′∈E|e^′ is adjacent to e}∪{e}. A function f:E→{1,−1} is called a signed edge domination function (SEDF) of G if ∑_e^′∈N[e]f(e^′)≥1 for every edge e of G. The signed edge domination number of G is defined as . In this paper, we characterize all trees T with signed edge domination numbers 1, 2, 3, or 4.     

On signed cycle domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph, a function f:E→{−1,1} is said to be an signed cycle dominating function (SCDF) of G if ∑_e∈E(C)f(e)≥1 holds for any induced cycle C of G. The signed cycle domination number of G is defined as is an SCDF of G}. In this paper, we obtain bounds on , characterize all connected graphs G with , and determine the exact value of for some special classes of graphs G. In addition, we pose some open problems and conjectures.     

On the Roman domination number of a graph

A Roman dominating function of a graph G is a labeling f:V(G)?{0,1,2} such that every vertex with label 0 has a neighbor with label 2. The Roman domination number γ_R(G) of G is the minimum of ∑_v∈V(G)f(v) over such functions. A Roman dominating function of G of weight γ_R(G) is called a γ_R(G)-function. A Roman dominating function f:V?{0,1,2} can be represented by the ordered partition (V₀,V₁,V₂) of V, where V_i={v∈V∣f(v)=i}. Cockayne et al. [E.J. Cockayne, P.A. Dreyer, S.M. Hedetniemi, S.T. Hedetniemi, On Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004) 11-22] posed the following question: What can we say about the minimum and maximum values of |V₀|,|V₁|,|V₂| for a γ_R-function f=(V₀,V₁,V₂) of a graph G? In this paper we first show that for any connected graph G of order n≥3, , where γ(G) is the domination number of G. Also we prove that for any γ_R-function f=(V₀,V₁,V₂) of a connected graph G of order n≥3, , and .     

Rainbow domination on trees

This paper studies a variation of domination in graphs called rainbow domination. For a positive integer k, a k-rainbow dominating function of a graph G is a function f from V(G) to the set of all subsets of {1,2,…,k} such that for any vertex v with f(v)=0? we have ∪_u∈NG(v)f(u)={1,2,…,k}. The 1-rainbow domination is the same as the ordinary domination. The k-rainbow domination problem is to determine the k-rainbow domination number of a graph G, that is the minimum value of ∑_v∈V(G)|f(v)| where f runs over all k-rainbow dominating functions of G. In this paper, we prove that the k-rainbow domination problem is NP-complete even when restricted to chordal graphs or bipartite graphs. We then give a linear-time algorithm for the k-rainbow domination problem on trees. For a given tree T, we also determine the smallest k such that .     

Domination with exponential decay

Let G be a graph and S⊆V(G). For each vertex u∈S and for each v∈V(G)−S, we define to be the length of a shortest path in 〈V(G)−(S−{u})〉 if such a path exists, and ∞ otherwise. Let v∈V(G). We define if v⁄∈S, and w_S(v)=2 if v∈S. If, for each v∈V(G), we have w_S(v)≥1, then S is an exponential dominating set. The smallest cardinality of an exponential dominating set is the exponential domination number, γ_e(G). In this paper, we prove: (i) that if G is a connected graph of diameter d, then γ_e(G)≥(d+2)/4, and, (ii) that if G is a connected graph of order n, then .     

The exact domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset S⊆V is a dominating set of G, if every vertex u∈V−S is dominated by some vertex v∈S. The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. For the generalized Petersen graph G(n), Behzad et al. [A. Behzad, M. Behzad, C.E. Praeger, On the domination number of the generalized Petersen graphs, Discrete Mathematics 308 (2008) 603-610] proved that and conjectured that the upper bound is the exact domination number. In this paper we prove this conjecture.     

Sum choice numbers of some graphs

Let f be a function assigning list sizes to the vertices of a graph G. The sum choice number of G is the minimum ∑_v∈V(G)f(v) such that for every assignment of lists to the vertices of G, with list sizes given by f, there exists proper coloring of G from the lists. We answer a few questions raised in a paper of Berliner, Bostelmann, Brualdi, and Deaett. Namely, we determine the sum choice number of the Petersen graph, the cartesian product of paths , and the complete bipartite graph K_3,n.     

Broadcasts in graphs

We say that a function f:V→{0,1,…,diam(G)} is a broadcast if for every vertex v∈V, f(v)?e(v), where diam(G) denotes the diameter of G and e(v) denotes the eccentricity of v. The cost of a broadcast is the value . In this paper we introduce and study the minimum and maximum costs of several types of broadcasts in graphs, including dominating, independent and efficient broadcasts.     

Selections of bounded variation under the excess restrictions

Let X be a metric space with metric d, c(X) denote the family of all nonempty compact subsets of X and, given F,G∈c(X), let e(F,G)=supx∈Finfy∈Gd(x,y) be the Hausdorff excess of F over G. The excess variation of a multifunction , which generalizes the ordinary variation V of single-valued functions, is defined by where the supremum is taken over all partitions of the interval [a,b]. The main result of the paper is the following selection theorem: If,V₊(F,[a,b])<∞,t₀∈[a,b]andx₀∈F(t₀), then there exists a single-valued functionof bounded variation such thatf(t)∈F(t)for allt∈[a,b],f(t₀)=x₀,V(f,[a,t₀))?V₊(F,[a,t₀))andV(f,[t₀,b])?V₊(F,[t₀,b]). We exhibit examples showing that the conclusions in this theorem are sharp, and that it produces new selections of bounded variation as compared with [V.V. Chistyakov, Selections of bounded variation, J. Appl. Anal. 10 (1) (2004) 1-82]. In contrast to this, a multifunction F satisfying e(F(s),F(t))?C(t−s) for some constant C?0 and all s,t∈[a,b] with s?t (Lipschitz continuity with respect to e(⋅,⋅)) admits a Lipschitz selection with a Lipschitz constant not exceeding C if t₀=a and may have only discontinuous selections of bounded variation if a<t₀?b. The same situation holds for continuous selections of when it is excess continuous in the sense that e(F(s),F(t))→0 as s→t−0 for all t∈(a,b] and e(F(t),F(s))→0 as s→t+0 for all t∈[a,b) simultaneously.     

Variations of Y-dominating functions on graphs

Let Y be a subset of real numbers. A Y-dominating function of a graph G=(V,E) is a function f:V→Y such that for all vertices v∈V, where N_G[v]={v}∪{u|(u,v)∈E}. Let for any subset S of V and let f(V) be the weight of f. The Y-domination problem is to find a Y-dominating function of minimum weight for a graph G=(V,E). In this paper, we study the variations of Y-domination such as {k}-domination, k-tuple domination, signed domination, and minus domination for some classes of graphs. We give formulas to compute the {k}-domination, k-tuple domination, signed domination, and minus domination numbers of paths, cycles, n-fans, n-wheels, n-pans, and n-suns. Besides, we present a unified approach to these four problems on strongly chordal graphs. Notice that trees, block graphs, interval graphs, and directed path graphs are subclasses of strongly chordal graphs. This paper also gives complexity results for the problems on doubly chordal graphs, dually chordal graphs, bipartite planar graphs, chordal bipartite graphs, and planar graphs.     

Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs. 23. On the Randi? index and the chromatic number

Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph with vertex degrees d₁,d₂,…,d_n. The Randi? index R(G) is equal to the sum over all edges (i,j)∈E of weights . We prove several conjectures, obtained by the system AutoGraphiX, relating R(G) and the chromatic number χ(G). The main result is χ(G)≤2R(G). To prove it, we also show that if v∈V is a vertex of minimum degree δ of G, G−v the graph obtained from G by deleting v and all incident edges, and Δ the maximum degree of G, then .     

The upper connected geodetic number and forcing connected geodetic number of a graph

For a connected graph G of order p≥2, a set S⊆V(G) is a geodetic set of G if each vertex v∈V(G) lies on an x-y geodesic for some elements x and y in S. The minimum cardinality of a geodetic set of G is defined as the geodetic number of G, denoted by g(G). A geodetic set of cardinality g(G) is called a g-set of G. A connected geodetic set of G is a geodetic set S such that the subgraph G[S] induced by S is connected. The minimum cardinality of a connected geodetic set of G is the connected geodetic number of G and is denoted by g_c(G). A connected geodetic set of cardinality g_c(G) is called a g_c-set of G. A connected geodetic set S in a connected graph G is called a minimal connected geodetic set if no proper subset of S is a connected geodetic set of G. The upper connected geodetic number is the maximum cardinality of a minimal connected geodetic set of G. We determine bounds for and determine the same for some special classes of graphs. For positive integers r,d and n≥d+1 with r≤d≤2r, there exists a connected graph G with , and . Also, for any positive integers 2≤a<b≤c, there exists a connected graph G such that g(G)=a, g_c(G)=b and . A subset T of a g_c-set S is called a forcing subset for S if S is the unique g_c-set containing T. A forcing subset for S of minimum cardinality is a minimum forcing subset of S. The forcing connected geodetic number of S, denoted by f_c(S), is the cardinality of a minimum forcing subset of S. The forcing connected geodetic number of G, denoted by f_c(G), is f_c(G)=min{f_c(S)}, where the minimum is taken over all g_c-sets S in G. It is shown that for every pair a,b of integers with 0≤a≤b−4, there exists a connected graph G such that f_c(G)=a and g_c(G)=b.     

On edge domination numbers of graphs

Let and be the signed edge domination number and signed star domination number of G, respectively. We prove that holds for all graphs G without isolated vertices, where n=|V(G)|?4 and m=|E(G)|, and pose some problems and conjectures.     

A note on the signed edge domination number in graphs

Let G=(V(G),E(G)) be a graph. A function f:E(G)→{+1,−1} is called the signed edge domination function (SEDF) of G if ∑_e^′N[e]f(e^′)≥1 for every eE(G). The signed edge domination number of G is defined as is a SEDF of G}. Xu [Baogen Xu, Two classes of edge domination in graphs, Discrete Applied Mathematics 154 (2006) 1541–1546] researched on the edge domination in graphs and proved that for any graph G of order n(n≥4). In the article, he conjectured that: For any 2-connected graph G of order n(n≥2), . In this note, we present some counterexamples to the above conjecture and prove that there exists a family of k-connected graphs G_m,k with .