Two classes of edge domination in graphs

Let (, resp.) be the number of (local) signed edge domination of a graph G [B. Xu, On signed edge domination numbers of graphs, Discrete Math. 239 (2001) 179-189]. In this paper, we prove mainly that and hold for any graph G of order n(n?4), and pose several open problems and conjectures.     

A comment to: Two classes of edge domination in graphs

Let G be a graph of order n and denote the signed edge domination number of G. In [B. Xu, Two classes of edge domination in graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 154 (2006) 1541-1546] it was proved that for any graph G of order n, . But the method given in the proof is not correct. In this paper we give an example for which the method of proof given in [1] does not work.     

On signed cycle domination in graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph, a function f:E→{−1,1} is said to be an signed cycle dominating function (SCDF) of G if ∑_e∈E(C)f(e)≥1 holds for any induced cycle C of G. The signed cycle domination number of G is defined as is an SCDF of G}. In this paper, we obtain bounds on , characterize all connected graphs G with , and determine the exact value of for some special classes of graphs G. In addition, we pose some open problems and conjectures.     

Edge-recognizable domination numbers

For any undirected graph G, let be the collection of edge-deleted subgraphs. It is always possible to construct a graph H from so that . The general edge-reconstruction conjecture states that G and H must be isomorphic if they have at least four edges. A graphical invariant that must be identical for all graphs that can be constructed from the given collection is said to be edge-recognizable. Here we show that the domination number and many of its common variations are edge-recognizable.     

On NP-hardness of the clique partition—Independence number gap recognition and related problems

We show that for a graph G it is NP-hard to decide whether its independence number α(G) equals its clique partition number even when some minimum clique partition of G is given. This implies that any α(G)-upper bound provably better than is NP-hard to compute.To establish this result we use a reduction of the quasigroup completion problem (QCP, known to be NP-complete) to the maximum independent set problem. A QCP instance is satisfiable if and only if the independence number α(G) of the graph obtained within the reduction is equal to the number of holes h in the QCP instance. At the same time, the inequality always holds. Thus, QCP is satisfiable if and only if . Computing the Lovász number ?(G) we can detect QCP unsatisfiability at least when . In the other cases QCP reduces to gap recognition, with one minimum clique partition of G known.     

Coloring the complements of intersection graphs of geometric figures

Let be the complement of the intersection graph G of a family of translations of a compact convex figure in Rⁿ. When n=2, we show that , where γ(G) is the size of the minimum dominating set of G. The bound on is sharp. For higher dimension we show that , for n?3. We also study the chromatic number of the complement of the intersection graph of homothetic copies of a fixed convex body in Rⁿ.     

Edges not contained in triangles and the number of contractible edges in a 4-connected graph

Let G be a 4-connected graph, and let E_c(G) denote the set of 4-contractible edges of G and let denote the set of those edges of G which are not contained in a triangle. Under this notation, we show that if , then we have .     

Total domination and total domination subdivision number of a graph and its complement

A set S of vertices of a graph G=(V,E) with no isolated vertex is a total dominating set if every vertex of V(G) is adjacent to some vertex in S. The total domination numberγ_t(G) is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. The total domination subdivision numbersd_γt(G) is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided in order to increase the total domination number. We consider graphs of order n?4, minimum degree δ and maximum degree Δ. We prove that if each component of G and has order at least 3 and , then and if each component of G and has order at least 2 and at least one component of G and has order at least 3, then . We also give a result on stronger than a conjecture by Harary and Haynes.     

Some relations between rank, chromatic number and energy of graphs

The energy of a graph G, denoted by E(G), is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of G. Let G be a graph of order n and be the rank of the adjacency matrix of G. In this paper we characterize all graphs with . Among other results we show that apart from a few families of graphs, , where n is the number of vertices of G, and χ(G) are the complement and the chromatic number of G, respectively. Moreover some new lower bounds for E(G) in terms of are given.     

Distance irredundance and connected domination numbers of a graph

Let k be a positive integer and G be a connected graph. This paper considers the relations among four graph theoretical parameters: the k-domination number γ_k(G), the connected k-domination number ; the k-independent domination number and the k-irredundance number ir_k(G). The authors prove that if an ir_k-set X is a k-independent set of G, then , and that for k?2, if ir_k(G)=1, if ir_k(G) is odd, and if ir_k(G) is even, which generalize some known results.     

General neighbour-distinguishing index via chromatic number

An edge colouring of a graph G without isolated edges is neighbour-distinguishing if any two adjacent vertices have distinct sets consisting of colours of their incident edges. The general neighbour-distinguishing index of G is the minimum number of colours in a neighbour-distinguishing edge colouring of G. Gy?ri et al. [E. Gy?ri, M. Horňák, C. Palmer, M. Wo?niak, General neighbour-distinguishing index of a graph, Discrete Math. 308 (2008) 827-831] proved that provided G is bipartite and gave a complete characterisation of bipartite graphs according to their general neighbour-distinguishing index. The aim of this paper is to prove that if χ(G)≥3, then . Therefore, if log₂χ(G)∉Z, then .     

Hamilton decompositions of directed cubes and products

Call a directed graph symmetric if it is obtained from an undirected graph G by replacing each edge of G by two directed edges, one in each direction. We will show that if G has a Hamilton decomposition with certain additional structure, then has a directed Hamilton decomposition. In particular, it will follow that the bidirected cubes for m?2 are decomposable into 2m+1 directed Hamilton cycles and that a product of cycles is decomposable into 2m+1 directed Hamilton cycles if n_i?3 and m?2.     

Generalization of transitive fraternal augmentations for directed graphs and its applications

Let be a directed graph. A transitive fraternal augmentation of is a directed graph with the same vertex set, including all the arcs of and such that for any vertices x,y,z,

1.

if and then or (fraternity);

2.

if and then (transitivity).

In this paper, we explore some generalization of the transitive fraternal augmentations for directed graphs and its applications. In particular, we show that the 2-coloring number col₂(G)≤O(∇₁(G)∇₀(G)²), where ∇_k(G) (k≥0) denotes the greatest reduced average density with depth k of a graph G; we give a constructive proof that ∇_k(G) bounds the distance (k+1)-coloring number col_k+1(G) with a function f(∇_k(G)). On the other hand, ∇_k(G)≤(col_2k+1(G))^2k+1. We also show that an inductive generalization of transitive fraternal augmentations can be used to study nonrepetitive colorings of graphs.     

The signed star domination numbers of the Cartesian product graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). A function f:E(G)→{-1,1} is said to be a signed star dominating function of G if for every v∈V(G), where E_G(v)={uv∈E(G)|u∈V(G)}. The minimum of the values of , taken over all signed star dominating functions f on G, is called the signed star domination number of G and is denoted by γ_SS(G). In this paper, a sharp upper bound of γ_SS(G×H) is presented.     

The hamiltonian index of a 2-connected graph

Let G be a graph. Then the hamiltonian index h(G) of G is the smallest number of iterations of line graph operator that yield a hamiltonian graph. In this paper we show that for every 2-connected simple graph G that is not isomorphic to the graph obtained from a dipole with three parallel edges by replacing every edge by a path of length l≥3. We also show that for any two 2-connected nonhamiltonian graphs G and with at least 74 vertices. The upper bounds are all sharp.     

On wreathed lexicographic products of graphs

This paper proves a necessary and sufficient condition for the endomorphism monoid of a lexicographic product G[H] of graphs G,H to be the wreath product of the monoids and . The paper also gives respective necessary and sufficient conditions for specialized cases such as for unretractive or triangle-free graphs G.     

On conjugate adjacency matrices of a graph

Let G be a simple graph of order n. Let and , where a and b are two nonzero integers and m is a positive integer such that m is not a perfect square. We say that A^c=[c_ij] is the conjugate adjacency matrix of the graph G if c_ij=c for any two adjacent vertices i and j, for any two nonadjacent vertices i and j, and c_ij=0 if i=j. Let P_G(λ)=|λI-A| and denote the characteristic polynomial and the conjugate characteristic polynomial of G, respectively. In this work we show that if then , where denotes the complement of G. In particular, we prove that if and only if P_G(λ)=P_H(λ) and . Further, let P^c(G) be the collection of conjugate characteristic polynomials of vertex-deleted subgraphs G_i=G?i(i=1,2,…,n). If P^c(G)=P^c(H) we prove that , provided that the order of G is greater than 2.     

The tail is cut for Ramsey numbers of cubes

The Ramsey number R(G) of a graph G is the least integer p such that for all bicolorings of the edges of the complete graph K_p, one of the monochromatic subgraphs contains a copy of G. We show that for any positive constant c and bipartite graph G=(U,V;E) of order n where the maximum degree of vertices in U is at most , . Moreover, we show that the Ramsey number of the cube Q_n of dimension n satisfies . In both cases, the small terms are removed from the powers in the upper bounds of a earlier result of the author.     

Remarks on the minus (signed) total domination in graphs

A function f:V(G)→{+1,0,-1} defined on the vertices of a graph G is a minus total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least 1. The minus total domination number of G is the minimum weight of a minus total dominating function on G. By simply changing “{+1,0,-1}” in the above definition to “{+1,-1}”, we can define the signed total dominating function and the signed total domination number of G. In this paper we present a sharp lower bound on the signed total domination number for a k-partite graph, which results in a short proof of a result due to Kang et al. on the minus total domination number for a k-partite graph. We also give sharp lower bounds on and for triangle-free graphs and characterize the extremal graphs achieving these bounds.