Silyl modification of biologically active compounds. 13. Synthesis,cytotoxicity and antibacterial action of N‐methyl‐N‐(2‐triorganylsiloxyethyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro(iso)quinolinium iodides

A series of N‐methyl‐N‐(2‐triorganylsiloxyethyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro(iso)quinolinium iodides has been synthesized via dehydrocondensation reaction of N‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline, N‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroquinoline and 4,4‐dimethyl‐N‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐4‐sila‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline with trialkyl(aryl)hydrosilanes and subsequent alkylation, and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C and ²⁹Si NMR and mass spectroscopy. The biological activity data exhibited a marked enhancement of inhibitory activity against tumour cell lines and almost all the test bacterial/fungal strains in comparison with their 2‐hydroxyethyl precursors. Cytotoxicity in the microgram range against HT‐1080 (human fibrosarcoma) and MG‐22A (mouse hepatoma) cancer cell lines was observed for most of compounds. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A Series of Isolable Silanoic Thio‐, Seleno‐, and Telluroesters (LSi(X)OR) with Donor‐Supported SiX Double Bonds (L=β‐Diketiminate; X=S,Se, Te)

The first silicon analogues of carbonic (carboxylic) esters, the silanoic thio‐, seleno‐, and tellurosilylesters 3 (Si?S), 4 (Si?Se), and 5 (Si?Te), were prepared and isolated in crystalline form in high yield. These thermally robust compounds are easily accessible by direct reaction of the stable siloxysilylene L(Si:)OSi(H)L′ 2 (L=HC(CMe)₂[N(aryl)₂], L′=CH[(C?CH₂)‐CMe][N(aryl)]₂; aryl=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) with the respective elemental chalcogen. The novel compounds were fully characterized by methods including multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Owing to intramolecular N→Si donor–acceptor support of the Si?X moieties (X=S, Se, Te), these compounds have a classical valence‐bond N⁺–Si–X^? resonance betaine structure. At the same time, they also display a relatively strong nonclassical Si?X π‐bonding interaction between the chalcogen lone‐pair electrons (n_π donor orbitals) and two antibonding Si? N orbitals (σ*_π acceptor orbitals mainly located at silicon), which was shown by IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy. Accordingly, the Si?X bonds in the chalcogenoesters are 7.4 ( 3 ), 6.7 ( 4 ), and 6.9 % ( 5 ) shorter than the corresponding Si? X single bonds and, thus, only a little longer than those in electronically less disturbed Si?X systems (“heavier” ketones).     

An N‐Heterocyclic Silylene‐Stabilized Digermanium(0) Complex

The synthesis of an N‐heterocyclic silylene‐stabilized digermanium(0) complex is described. The reaction of the amidinate‐stabilized silicon(II) amide [LSiN(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 ; L=PhC(NtBu)₂) with GeCl₂?dioxane in toluene afforded the Si^II–Ge^II adduct [L{(Me₃Si)₂N}Si→GeCl₂] ( 2 ). Reaction of the adduct with two equivalents of KC₈ in toluene at room temperature afforded the N‐heterocyclic carbene silylene‐stabilized digermanium(0) complex [L{(Me₃Si)₂N}Si→ Ge?Ge←Si{N(SiMe₃)₂}L] ( 3 ). X‐ray crystallography and theoretical studies show conclusively that the N‐heterocyclic silylenes stabilize the singlet digermanium(0) moiety by a weak synergic donor–acceptor interaction.     

PO → Si intramolecular coordination in the derivatives of 1,4‐phosphasilacyclohexane 1‐oxides

The chair and boat conformers for a series of derivatives of 1,4‐phosphasilacyclohexane 1‐oxides have been calculated at the B3LYP/6‐311+G** level of theory in the gas phase and taking into account the effect of solvent polarity using the IEF‐PCM model. The stability of the boat conformers containing pentacoordinate silicon due to formation of the P?O→Si intramolecular coordination bond depends on the environment of the phosphorus atom and polarity of the solvent, and the strength of the transannular bond depends also on the nature of the substituents at the silicon atom. The highly polar boat conformers are strongly stabilized in the DMSO solution. NBO analysis showed the importance of the σ(C? Si) → σ*(H₃C? N) hyperconjugative interaction in the two H₃C? N? C? Si fragments of the ring favoring the formation of the pentacoordinate silicon atom. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2009     

Complexation Properties of N,N′,N″,N′′′‐[1,4,7,10‐Tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetrayltetrakis(1‐oxoethane‐2,1‐diyl)]tetrakis[glycine] (H4dotagl). Equilibrium,Kinetic, and Relaxation Behavior of the Lanthanide(III) Complexes

Eu³⁺, Dy³⁺, and Yb³⁺ complexes of the dota‐derived tetramide N,N′,N″,N′′′‐[1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetrayltetrakis(1‐oxoethane‐2,1‐diyl)]tetrakis[glycine] (H₄dotagl) are potential CEST contrast agents in MRI. In the [Ln(dotagl)] complexes, the Ln³⁺ ion is in the cage formed by the four ring N‐atoms and the amide O‐atom donor atoms, and a H₂O molecule occupies the ninth coordination site. The stability constants of the [Ln(dotagl)] complexes are ca. 10 orders of magnitude lower than those of the [Ln(dota)] analogues (H₄dota=1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetraacetic acid). The free carboxylate groups in [Ln(dotagl)] are protonated in the pH range 1–5, resulting in mono‐, di‐, tri‐, and tetraprotonated species. Complexes with divalent metals (Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cu²⁺) are also of relatively low stability. At pH>8, Cu²⁺ forms a hydroxo complex; however, the amide H‐atom(s) does not dissociate due to the absence of anchor N‐atom(s), which is the result of the rigid structure of the ring. The relaxivities of [Gd(dotagl)] decrease from 10 to 25°, then increase between 30–50°. This unusual trend is interpreted with the low H₂O‐exchange rate. The [Ln(dotagl)] complexes form slowly, via the equilibrium formation of a monoprotonated intermediate, which deprotonates and rearranges to the product in a slow, OH^?‐catalyzed reaction. The formation rates are lower than those for the corresponding Ln(dota) complexes. The dissociation rate of [Eu(dotagl)] is directly proportional to [H⁺] (0.1–1.0M HClO₄); the proton‐assisted dissociation rate is lower for [Eu(H₄dotagl)] (k₁=8.1?10^?6 M ^?1 s^?1) than for [Eu(dota)] (k₁=1.4?10^?5 M ^?1 s^?1).     

Hydrosilylation Induced by N→Si Intramolecular Coordination: Spontaneous Transformation of Organosilanes into 1‐Aza‐Silole‐Type Molecules in the Absence of a Catalyst

Our attempts to synthesize the N→Si intramolecularly coordinated organosilanes Ph₂L¹SiH ( 1 a ), PhL¹SiH₂ ( 2 a ), Ph₂L²SiH ( 3 a ), and PhL²SiH₂ ( 4 a ) containing a CH?N imine group (in which L¹ is the C,N‐chelating ligand {2‐[CH?N(C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂)]C₆H₄}^? and L² is {2‐[CH?N(tBu)]C₆H₄}^?) yielded 1‐[2,6‐bis(diisopropyl)phenyl]‐2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐aza‐silole ( 1 ), 1‐[2,6‐bis(diisopropyl)phenyl]‐2‐phenyl‐2‐hydrido‐1‐aza‐silole ( 2 ), 1‐tert‐butyl‐2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐aza‐silole ( 3 ), and 1‐tert‐butyl‐2‐phenyl‐2‐hydrido‐1‐aza‐silole ( 4 ), respectively. Isolated organosilicon amides 1 – 4 are an outcome of the spontaneous hydrosilylation of the CH?N imine moiety induced by N→Si intramolecular coordination. Compounds 1–4 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray diffraction analysis. The geometries of organosilanes 1 a – 4 a and their corresponding hydrosilylated products 1 – 4 were optimized and fully characterized at the B3LYP/6‐31++G(d,p) level of theory. The molecular structure determination of 1 – 3 suggested the presence of a Si?N double bond. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis, however, shows a very strong donor–acceptor interaction between the lone pair of the nitrogen atom and the formal empty p orbital on the silicon and therefore, the calculations show that the Si?N bond is highly polarized pointing to a predominantly zwitterionic Si⁺N^? bond in 1 – 4 . Since compounds 1 – 4 are hydrosilylated products of 1 a – 4 a , the free energies (ΔG₂₉₈), enthalpies (ΔH₂₉₈), and entropies (ΔH₂₉₈) were computed for the hydrosilylation reaction of 1 a – 4 a with both B3LYP and B3LYP‐D methods. On the basis of the very negative ΔG₂₉₈ values, the hydrosilylation reaction is highly exergonic and compounds 1 a – 4 a are spontaneously transformed into 1 – 4 in the absence of a catalyst.     

catena‐Poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)­silver(I)]‐μ‐nicotinato] and catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato]

In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐nico­tinato‐κ²N:O], [Ag(C₆H₄NO₂)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom is tetracoordinated by two N atoms from the di‐2‐pyridyl­amine (BPA) ligand [Ag—N = 2.3785 (18) and 2.3298 (18) Å] and by one N atom and one carboxyl­ate O atom from nicotinate ligands [Ag—N = 2.2827 (15) Å and Ag—O = 2.3636 (14) Å]. Bridging by nicotinate N and O atoms generates a polymeric chain structure, which extends along [100]. The carboxyl O atom not bonded to the Ag atom takes part in an intrachain C—H⋯O hydrogen bond, further stabilizing the chain. Pairs of chains are linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to generate ribbons. There are no π–π interactions in this complex. In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato‐κ²O¹:O²], [Ag(C₇H₅O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom has a distorted tetrahedral coordination, with three strong bonds to two pyridine N atoms from the BPA ligand [Ag—N = 2.286 (5) and 2.320 (5) Å] and to one carboxyl­ate O atom from the 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligand [Ag—O = 2.222 (4) Å]; the fourth, weaker, Ag‐atom coordination is to one of the phenol O atoms [Ag⋯O = 2.703 (4) Å] of an adjacent moiety, and this interaction generates a polymeric chain along [100]. Pairs of chains are linked about inversion centers by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form ribbons, within which there are π–π interactions. The ribbons are linked about inversion centers by pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and additional π–π interactions between inversion‐related pairs of 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligands to generate a three‐dimensional network.     

A one‐dimensional zinc(II) coordination polymer incorporating [1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate and N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide ligands

In the title compound, catena‐poly[[[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide]chloridozinc(II)]‐μ‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylato‐[[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide]chloridozinc(II)]‐μ‐[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide]], [Zn₂(C₁₄H₈O₄)Cl₂(C₂₆H₂₂N₄O₂)₃]_n, the Zn^II centre is four‐coordinate and approximately tetrahedral, bonding to one carboxylate O atom from a bidentate bridging dianionic [1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate ligand, to two pyridine N atoms from two N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐ylmethyl)‐[1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxamide ligands and to one chloride ligand. The pyridyl ligands exhibit bidentate bridging and monodentate terminal coordination modes. The bidentate bridging pyridyl ligand and the bridging [1,1′‐biphenyl]‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate ligand both lie on special positions, with inversion centres at the mid‐points of their central C—C bonds. These bridging groups link the Zn^II centres into a one‐dimensional tape structure that propagates along the crystallographic b direction. The tapes are interlinked into a two‐dimensional layer in the ab plane through N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the monodentate ligands. In addition, the thermal stability and solid‐state photoluminescence properties of the title compound are reported.     

The one‐dimensional structure of Cu(dmen)2Pd(CN)4 (dmen is N,N‐di­methyl­ethyl­enedi­amine)

The title compound, catena‐poly­[[μ‐cyano‐1:2κ²C:N‐dicyano‐1κ²C‐bis(N,N‐di­methyl­ethyl­enedi­amine‐2κ²N,N′)­pallad­ium(II)­copper(II)]‐μ‐cyano‐1:2′κ²C:N], [CuPd(CN)₄(C₄H₁₂N₂)₂]_n, consists of infinite quasi‐linear chains with all metal positions on centers of symmetry. The paramagnetic [Cu(dmen)₂]²⁺ cations are linked by diamagnetic [Pd(CN)₄]²⁻ anions via bridging cyano groups, which occupy trans positions in both cation and anion, giving rise to 2,2‐TT‐type chains. The coordination polyhedron of the paramagnetic Cu atom is an octahedron exhibiting typical elongation due to the Jahn–Teller effect, with two longer Cu—N([triple‐bond]C) bonds in the axial positions [2.5528 (13) Å] and four shorter Cu—N_dmen bonds (dmen is N,N‐dimethylethylenediamine) in the equatorial plane [1.9926 (11) and 2.1149 (12) Å]. The Cu—N[triple‐bond]C angle is 138.03 (12)°. Neighboring chains form weak N—H⋯NC hydrogen bonds.     

Pyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde Thiosemicarbazonates of Nickel(II) and Palladium(II): Synthesis,Structure, and Spectroscopy

Complexes of pyrrole‐2‐carbaldehyde thiosemicarbazones, [(C₄H₄N⁴)(H)C²=N³–N²(H)–C¹(=S)–N¹HR; R = Ph, H₂L¹; Me, H₂L²; H, H₂L³] with nickel(II) and palladium(II) are described. The reaction of nickel(II) acetate with H₂L¹ in methanol in 1:1 molar ratio yielded a complex of composition, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL¹)₂] ( 1 ). Likewise reaction of NiCl₂ with H₂L² in 1:1 molar ratio in acetonitrile in the presence of triethylamine base followed by the addition of pyridine did not yield the anticipated [Ni(κ³‐N⁴,N³,S‐L²)(py)] complex, moreover a bis‐square‐planar complex, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL²)₂] ( 2 ) was formed. However, in the presence of bipyridine (bipy), it yielded the addition product, [Ni(κ²‐N³,S‐HL²)₂(κ²‐N, N‐bipy)] ( 3 ). Reaction of PdCl₂(κ²‐P, P–PPh₂–CH₂–PPh₂) with H₂L³ in toluene in the presence of triethylamine has yielded a complex of stoichiometry, [Pd(κ³‐N⁴,N³,S–L³)(κ¹‐P–PPh₂–CH₂–P(O)Ph₂] ( 4 ). The ligands (HL¹)^– and (HL²)^– are chelating to Ni^II metal atom as anions binding through N³,S‐donor atoms with pendant pyrrole groups, and (L³)^2– is chelating to the Pd^II metal atom as dianion through N⁴,N³,S‐donor atoms (pyrrole is N⁴‐bonded). Fourth site in 4 is bonded to one P‐donor atom of PPh₂–CH₂–P(O)Ph₂, whose pendant –PPh₂ group involves auto oxidation to –P(O)PPh₂ during reaction. These complexes were characterized using analytical data, IR, NMR (¹H, ³¹P) spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 1 , 2 , and 4 have square‐planar arrangement, whereas complex 3 is octahedral.     

The conformations of two copper(I) complexes of 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione and thiosaccharinate

(Acetonitrile‐1κN)[μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S][1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐2κS]bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₂(CH₃CN)] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₂(CH₃CN)] [tsac is thiosaccharinate and Sbim is 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione], (I), is a new copper(I) compound that consists of a triply bridged dinuclear Cu—Cu unit. In the complex molecule, two tsac anions and one neutral Sbim ligand bind the metals. One anion bridges via the endocyclic N and exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:N). The other anion and one of the mercaptobenzimidazole molecules bridge the metals through their exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:S). The second Sbim ligand coordinates in a monodentate fashion (κS) to one Cu atom, while an acetonitrile molecule coordinates to the other Cu atom. The Cu^I—Cu^I distance [2.6286 (6) Å] can be considered a strong `cuprophilic' interaction. In the case of [μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S]bis[1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione]‐1κS;2κS‐bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₃] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₃], (II), the acetonitrile molecule is substituted by an additional Sbim ligand, which binds one Cu atom via the exocylic S atom. In this case, the Cu^I—Cu^I distance is 2.6068 (11) Å.     

[N,N′‐Bis(3‐aminopropyl)ethylenediamine‐κ4N,N′,N′′,N′′′](trithiocyanurato‐κ2N,S)zinc(II) ethanol solvate

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine‐κ⁴N,N′,N′′,N′′′][1,3,5‐triazine‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐tri­thionato(2−)‐κ²N,S]­zinc(II) ethanol sol­vate, [Zn(C₈H₂₂N₄)₂(C₃HN₃S₃)]·C₂H₆O, the Zn^II atom is octa­hedrally coordinated by four N atoms [Zn—N = 2.104 (2)–2.203 (2) Å] of a tetradentate N‐donor N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine (bapen) ligand and by two S and N atoms [Zn—S = 2.5700 (7) Å and Zn—N = 2.313 (2) Å] of a tri­thio­cyanurate(2−) (ttcH²⁻) dianion bonded as a bidentate ligand in a cis configuration. The crystal structure of the compound is stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds.     

catena‐Poly[[[2,4‐dichloro‐6‐(pyridin‐2‐ylmethyl­iminomethyl)phenolato]copper(II)]‐μ‐thio­cyanato]

The title complex, [Cu(C₁₃H₉Cl₂N₂O)(NCS)]_n, is a novel thio­cyanate‐bridged polynuclear copper(II) compound. The Cu^II atom is five‐coordinated in a square‐pyramidal configuration, with one O and two N atoms of one Schiff base ligand and one terminal N atom of a bridging thio­cyanate ligand defining the basal plane, and one terminal S atom of another bridging thio­cyanate ligand occupying the axial position. The [2,4‐dichloro‐6‐(pyridin‐2‐ylmethyl­imino­methyl)­phenolato]­copper(II) moieties are linked by the bridging thio­cyanate ligands, forming polymeric chains running along the a axis.     

Making an order: the concerted alignment of [MOF5]2− (M = Nb and Ta) dipolar anions in one‐dimensional coordination chains sustained by tris(3,4,5‐trimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole)copper(II)

Electronic distortions, which are inherent in the oxide fluoride anions [MOF₅]²⁻ (M = Nb and Ta), provide an origin of polar molecular arrangements for the development of new polar second‐harmonic‐generating, piezo‐, pyro‐ and ferroelectric materials. It is still a challenge to expand this approach to the realm of metal–organic polymers, while insufficient control over the environment of the [MOF₅]²⁻ units results in their orientational disorder and loss of polarity. The structures of catena‐poly[[tris(3,4,5‐trimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)copper(II)]‐μ‐oxido‐[tetrafluoridoniobium(V)]‐μ‐fluorido], [CuNbF₅O(C₆H₁₀N₂)₃]_n, (I), and its isostructural pentafluoridooxidotantalate(V) analogue, catena‐poly[[tris(3,4,5‐trimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)copper(II)]‐μ‐oxido‐[tetrafluoridotantalum(V)]‐μ‐fluorido], [CuTaF₅O(C₆H₁₀N₂)₃]_n, (II), are the first examples of the strict orientational order of [MOF₅]²⁻ (M = Nb and Ta) in one‐dimensional coordination chains. A primary factor for the exact discrimination of one orientation of the anion over the other is strong and shape‐selective multiple interactions of [MOF₅]²⁻ with the inherently acentric CuL₃²⁺ platform, with a set of two coordination and three N—H…F hydrogen bonds. In (I) and (II), the Cu²⁺ ions exhibit distorted square‐pyramidal fivefold coordination formed by three pyrazole N atoms and the oxide O atom, defining the equatorial plane, and the anionic bridging F atom (which is trans with respect to the M—O bond) residing in the apical position. The inorganic bridges connect CuL₃²⁺ moieties into polar zigzag chains; the bulk polarity of the structure is eliminated by an antiparallel alignment of the individual chains. These chains are further connected through C—H…F hydrogen bonding and very weak C—H…π interactions of the organic ligands.     

Transition metal complexes with thio­semicarbazide‐based ligands. XV. A square‐pyramidal NiII complex with an asymmetric coordination of 2,6‐di­acetyl­pyridine bis(S‐methyl­iso­thio­semicarbazone)

The title compound, [di­acetyl­pyridine bis(S‐methyl­iso­thio­semicarbazonato)]­iodo­nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₃H₁₈N₇S₂)I], is the first example of a complex involving the ²N coordination of the iso­thio­semicarbazide moiety. 2,6‐Di­acetyl­pyridine bis(S‐methyl­iso­thio­semicarbazone), as a potentially pentadentate ligand (N₅), is coordinated as a tetradentate species, whereby one (deprotonated) iso­thio­semicarbazide moiety is coordinated in the usual way (¹N⁴N), but the other (neutral) is bonded via the ²N atom only, the fourth ligator being the pyridine nitro­gen. The difference in coordination mode of the iso­thio­semicarbazide moiety is reflected in the ¹N—²N bond lengths of 1.359 (4) and 1.379 (3) Å in the deprotonated and undeprotonated moieties, respectively. The structure contains three fused chelate rings in a 5:5:6 arrangement. The six‐membered ring has a non‐planar conformation.     

Synthesis and molecular structure of Cr(salen)(μ‐N)RhCl(COD): the first example of a heterobimetallic nitride‐bridged complex containing chromium

Five‐coordinate Cr(N)(salen) {salen is 2,2′‐[ethane‐1,2‐diylbis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenolate} reacts with [RhCl(COD)]₂ (COD is 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) to yield the heterobimetallic nitride‐bridged title compound, namely chlorido‐2κCl‐[2(η⁴)‐1,5‐cyclooctadiene]{2,2′‐[ethane‐1,2‐diylbis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenolato‐1κ⁴O,N,N′,O′}‐μ‐nitrido‐1:2κ²N:N‐chromium(V)rhodium(I), [CrRh(C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₂)ClN(C₈H₁₂)]. The Cr—N bond of 1.5936 (14) Å is elongated by only 0.035 Å compared to the terminal Cr—N bond in the precursor. The nitride bridge is close to being linear [173.03 (9)°] and the Rh—N bond of 1.9594 (14) Å is very short for a monodentate nitrogen‐donor ligand, indicating significant π‐acceptor character of the Cr[triple‐bond]N group.     

Synthesis,Structure and Noncovalent Interactions Palladium（Ⅱ）Complexes with N—Benzoyl—β—phenylalaniate Dianion and Aromatic Diimine

Two palladium(II) complexes, [Pd(bipy)(BzPhe‐N,O)] and [Pd(phen)(BzPhe‐N,O)]·4H₂O were synthesized by reactions between Pd(bipy)Cl₂ and BzPheH₂ (N‐benzoyl‐β‐phenylalanine), Pd(phen) Cl₂ and BzPheH₂ in water at pH‐9, with their structures determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The Pd atom is coordinated by two nitrogen atoms of bipy (or phen), the deprotonated amido type nitrogen atom and one of the carboxylic oxygens of BzPhe (BzPhe = N‐benzoyl‐β‐phenylalaninate dianion). In the complex [Pd(phen) (BzFne‐N,O)] · 4H₂O, the side chain of phenylalanine is located above and approximately parallels to the coordination plane. Both the aromatic‐aromatic stacking interaction between the phenyl ring of phenylalanine and phen, and the metal ion‐aromatic interaction between the phenyl ring of phenylalanine and Pd(II) were observed. [Pd(bipy)(BzPhe‐N,O)] has the phenylalanyl side chain oriented outwards from the coordination plane, which is mainly due to the interaction between the carbonyl oxygen atom of the amido group and the phenyl ring of phenylalanine. The reason for the different orientation of phenylalanyl side chain in the complexes was suggested.     

Pictet‐Spengler Condensation of N,N‐Dimethylsulfamoyl‐β‐Phenethylamines with Methylthioacetic Acid Ethyl Ester. New Synthesis of Ethyl 1,2,3,4‐Tetrahydroisoquinoline‐1‐Carboxylates

The reaction of N,N‐dimethylsulfamoyl‐β‐phenethylamines with methylthioacetic acid ethyl ester using phenyliodine(III) bis(trifluoroacetate) gives moderate to good yields of the corresponding ethyl 1,2,3,4‐tetrahydroisoquinoline‐1‐carboxylates.     

catena‐Poly[[[N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)propane‐1,3‐diaminato]cobalt(III)]‐μ‐azido] and catena‐poly[[[N,N′‐bis(salicyl­idene)propane‐1,3‐diaminato]cobalt(III)]‐μ‐thio­cyanato]

The two title complexes, catena‐poly[[{2,2′‐[1,3‐propane­diylbis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenolato}cobalt(III)]‐μ‐azido], [Co(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂)(N₃)]_n, (I), and catena‐poly[[{2,2′‐[1,3‐propane­diylbis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenolato}cobalt(III)]‐μ‐thio­cyanato], [Co(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂)(NCS)]_n, (II), are isomorphous polynuclear cobalt(III) compounds. In both structures, the Co^III atom is six‐coordinated in an octa­hedral configuration by two N atoms and two O atoms of one Schiff base, and two terminal N or S atoms from two bridging ligands. The [N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)propane‐1,3‐diaminato]cobalt(III) moieties are linked by the bridging ligands, viz. azide in (I) and thio­cyanate in (II), giving zigzag polymeric chains with backbones of the type [–Co—N—N—N—Co]_n in (I) or [–Co—N—C—S—Co]_n in (II) running along the c axis.     

Reaction of tetrafluorosilane with tris(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, tris(2-trimethylsiloxyethyl)amine and bis(2-trimethylsiloxyethyl)amine and its N-methyl derivative. 1,1-difluoroquasisilatranes

Reaction of tetrafluorosilane with tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-and tris(2-trimethylsiloxyethyl)amine results in formation of 1-fluorosilatrane and fluorosilatrane in 75 and 53% yield, respectively. Reaction of tetrafluorosilane with bis(2-trimethylsiloxyethyl)amine and its N-methyl derivative leads to the hitherto unknown 1,1-difluoroquasisilatranes (N → Si) F₂Si(OCH₂CH₂)₂NR (R = H, Me) containing donor-acceptor bond N → Si and pentacoordinate silicon atom. The structure of the synthesized compounds was proved by ¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁵N, ¹⁹F, ²⁹Si NMR and IR spectroscopy.