On Clean Rings

A ring R is called clean if every element of R is the sum of an idempotent and a unit. Let M be a R-module. It is obtained in this article that the endomorphism ring End(M) is clean if and only if, whenever A = M′ ⊕ B = A₁ ⊕ A₂ with M′ ? M, there is a decomposition M′ =M₁ ⊕ M₂ such that A = M′ ⊕ [A₁ ∩ (M₁ ⊕ B)] ⊕ [A₂ ∩ (M₂ ⊕ B)]. Then unit-regular endomorphism rings are also described by direct decompositions.     

Separative Ideals,Clean Elements,and Unit-Regularity

ABSTRACT

We prove that an ideal I of a regular ring R is separative if and only if each a ? R satisfying Rr(a)aR = Ra?(a)R = RaR(1 ? a)R ? I is unit-regular. If I is a separative ideal of a regular ring R, then each a ? R satisfying Rar(a²) = ?(a²)aR = R(a ? a²) R ? I is clean. Some applications are also obtained.     

Regularity and Substructures of Hom

ABSTRACT

We define “regular” for maps in a Hom group. This notion specializes to the well-known notions of (Von Neumann) regular in rings and modules. A map f ∈ Hom _R (A,M) is regular if and only if Ker(f) ?^⊕ A and Im(f) ?^⊕ M. There exists a unique maximal regular End(M)-End(A)-submodule in Hom _R (A,M). We study regularity in Hom _R (A ₁ ⊕ A ₂, M ₁ ⊕ M ₂). The existence of a regular function Hom _R (A,M) implies the existence of projective summands of Hom _R (A,M) _{End R (A)} and of _{End R ( M )} Hom _R (A,M). We consider regularity in endomorphism rings, and generalize a theorem of Ware-Zelmanowitz. We examine connections between the maximum regular bimodule and other substructures of Hom, mention two generalizations of regularity, and raise some questions.     

On Galois Algebras Satisfying the Fundamental Theorem

Let B be a Galois algebra over a commutative ring R with Galois group G such that B ^H is a separable subalgebra of B for each subgroup H of G. Then it is shown that B satisfies the fundamental theorem if and only if B is one of the following three types: (1) B is an indecomposable commutative Galois algebra, (2) B = Re ⊕ R(1 ? e) where e and 1 ? e are minimal central idempotents in B, and (3) B is an indecomposable Galois algebra such that for each separable subalgebra A, V _B (A) = ?∑ _g∈G(A) J _g , and the centers of A and B ^G(A) are the same where V _B (A) is the commutator subring of A in B, J _g  = {b ∈ B | bx = g(x)b for each x ∈ B} for a g ∈ G, and G(A) = {g ∈ G | g(a) = a for all a ∈ A}.     

On Almost Unit-Regular Rings

An element a ∈ R is unit-regular provided that there exists an invertible u ∈ R such that a = aua. A ring R is called an almost unit-regular ring provided that for any a ∈ R, either a or 1 ? a is unit-regular. We characterize, in this article, the almost unit-regularity of Morita contexts with zero pairings. We also show that a ring R is unit-regular if and only if M ₂(R) is almost unit-regular. Various examples of such rings are constructed by means of formal triangular matrix rings.     

On rings with associated elements

A principal right ideal of a ring is called uniquely generated if any two elements of the ring that generate the same principal right ideal must be right associated (i.e., if for all a,b in a ring R, aR = bR implies a = bu for some unit u of R). In the present paper, we study “uniquely generated modules” as a module theoretic version of “uniquely generated ideals,” and we obtain a characterization of a unit-regular endomorphism ring of a module in terms of certain uniquely generated submodules of the module among some other results: End(M) is unit-regular if and only if End(M) is regular and all M-cyclic submodules of a right R-module M are uniquely generated. We also consider the questions of when an arbitrary element of a ring is associated to an element with a certain property. For example, we consider this question for the ring R[x;σ]∕(xⁿ⁺¹), where R is a strongly regular ring with an endomorphism σ be an endomorphism of R.     

Group homomorphisms inducing isomorphisms in cohomology

In this article, we call a ring R right generalized semiregular if for any a ∈ R there exist two left ideals P, L of R such that lr(a) = P⊕ L, where P ? Ra and Ra ∩ L is small in R. The class of generalized semiregular rings contains all semiregular rings and all AP-injective rings. Some properties of these rings are studied and some results about semiregular rings and AP-injective rings are extended. In addition, we call a ring R semi-π-regular if for any a ∈ R there exist a positive integer n and e ² = e ∈ a ⁿ R such that (1 ? e)a ⁿ  ∈ J(R), the Jacobson radical of R. It is shown that a ring R is semi-π-regular if and only if R/J(R) is π-regular and idempotents can be lifted modulo J(R).     

Hopf-Type Algebras

In this article, we provide an alternative approach to the definition of a weak Hopf algebra (WHA). For an associative unital algebra A with a coassociative comultiplication Δ ∈Alg ^u (A, A ? A), the set of homomorphisms from A to A ? A, which do not preserve the units. If the linear maps Ξ₁, Ξ₂ ∈ End(A ? A), defined by Ξ₁(a ? b) = Δ(a)(1 ? b), Ξ₂(a ? b) = (a ? 1)Δ(b), are von Neumann regular elements in the ring End(A ? A) of endomorphisms of A ? A satisfying some appropriate assumptions, we call the A a Hopf-type algebra. We show the existence of a target, a source, a counit, and an antipode of A as in the usual WHA.     

Semiregular Modules with Respect to a Fully Invariant Submodule

Abstract

Let M be a left R-module and F a submodule of M for any ring R. We call M F-semiregular if for every x ∈ M, there exists a decomposition M = A ⊕ B such that A is projective, A ≤ Rx and Rx ∩ B ≤ F. This definition extends several notions in the literature. We investigate some equivalent conditions to F-semiregular modules and consider some certain fully invariant submodules such as Z(M), Soc(M), δ(M). We prove, among others, that if M is a finitely generated projective module, then M is quasi-injective if and only if M is Z(M)-semiregular and M ⊕ M is CS. If M is projective Soc(M)-semiregular module, then M is semiregular. We also characterize QF-rings R with J(R)² = 0.     

On Strongly Clean Modules

An element of a ring R is called “strongly clean” if it is the sum of an idempotent and a unit that commute, and R is called “strongly clean” if every element of R is strongly clean. A module M is called “strongly clean” if its endomorphism ring End(M) is a strongly clean ring. In this article, strongly clean modules are characterized by direct sum decompositions, that is, M is a strongly clean module if and only if whenever M′⊕ B = A ₁⊕ A ₂ with M′? M, there are decompositions M′ = M ₁⊕ M ₂, B = B ₁⊕ B ₂, and A _i  = C _i ⊕ D _i (i = 1,2) such that M ₁⊕ B ₁ = C ₁⊕ D ₂ = M ₁⊕ C ₁ and M ₂⊕ B ₂ = D ₁⊕ C ₂ = M ₂⊕ C ₂.     

Simple-Direct-Projective Modules

In this paper, we introduce and study the dual notion of simple-direct-injective modules. Namely, a right R-module M is called simple-direct-projective if, whenever A and B are submodules of M with B simple and M/A ? B ?^⊕M, then A ?^⊕M. Several characterizations of simple-direct-projective modules are provided and used to describe some well-known classes of rings. For example, it is shown that a ring R is artinian and serial with J²(R) = 0 if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R-module is quasi-projective if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R -module is a D3-module. It is also shown that a ring R is uniserial with J²(R) = 0 if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R-module is a C3-module if and only if every simple-direct-injective right R -module is a D3-module.     

AA-Rings

Abstract

Let R be a ring with identity such that R ⁺, the additive group of R, is torsion-free of finite rank (tffr). The ring R is called an E-ring if End(R ⁺) = {x ? ax : a ∈ R} and is called an A-ring if Aut(R ⁺) = {x ? ux : u ∈ U(R)}, where U(R) is the group of units of R. While E-rings have been studied for decades, the notion of A-rings was introduced only recently. We now introduce a weaker notion. The ring R, 1 ∈ R, is called an AA-ring if for each α ∈ Aut(R ⁺) there is some natural number n such that α ⁿ  ∈ {x ? ux : u ∈ U(R)}. We will find all tffr AA-rings with nilradical N(R) ≠ {0} and show that all tffr AA-rings with N(R) = {0} are actually E-rings. As a consequence of our results on AA-rings, we are able to prove that all tffr A-rings are indeed E-rings.     

On Generalized Stable Ideals

An ideal I of a ring R is generalized stable in case aR + bR = R with a ∈ I, b ∈ R implies that there exist s, t ∈ 1 + I such that s(a + by)t = 1 for a y ∈ R. We establish, in this article, necessary and sufficient conditions for an ideal of a regular ring to be generalized stable. It is shown that every regular square matrix over such ideals admits a diagonal reduction. These extend the corresponding results of generalized stable regular rings.     

Rings Over which the Krull Dimension and the Noetherian Dimension of All Modules Coincide

We denote by 𝒜(R) the class of all Artinian R-modules and by 𝒩(R) the class of all Noetherian R-modules. It is shown that 𝒜(R) ? 𝒩(R) (𝒩(R) ? 𝒜(R)) if and only if 𝒜(R/P) ? 𝒩(R/P) (𝒩(R/P) ? 𝒜(R/P)), for all centrally prime ideals P (i.e., ab ∈ P, a or b in the center of R, then a ∈ P or b ∈ P). Equivalently, if and only if 𝒜(R/P) ? 𝒩(R/P) (𝒩(R/P) ? 𝒜(R/P)) for all normal prime ideals P of R (i.e., ab ∈ P, a, b normalize R, then a ∈ P or b ∈ P). We observe that finitely embedded modules and Artinian modules coincide over Noetherian duo rings. Consequently, 𝒜(R) ? 𝒩(R) implies that 𝒩(R) = 𝒜(R), where R is a duo ring. For a ring R, we prove that 𝒩(R) = 𝒜(R) if and only if the coincidence in the title occurs. Finally, if Q is the quotient field of a discrete valuation domain R, it is shown that Q is the only R-module which is both α-atomic and β-critical for some ordinals α,β ≥ 1 and in fact α = β = 1.     

Simple-direct-modules

A right R-module M is called simple-direct-injective if, whenever, A and B are simple submodules of M with A?B, and B?^⊕M, then A?^⊕M. Dually, M is called simple-direct-projective if, whenever, A and B are submodules of M with M∕A?B?^⊕M and B simple, then A?^⊕M. In this paper, we continue our investigation of these classes of modules strengthening many of the established results on the subject. For example, we show that a ring R is uniserial (artinian serial) with J²(R) = 0 iff every simple-direct-projective right R-module is an SSP-module (SIP-module) iff every simple-direct-injective right R-module is an SIP-module (SSP-module).     

Generalizations of Prime Ideals

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. Various generalizations of prime ideals have been studied. For example, a proper ideal I of R is weakly prime (resp., almost prime) if a, b ∈ R with ab ∈ I ? {0} (resp., ab ∈ I ? I ²) implies a ∈ I or b ∈ I. Let φ:?(R) → ?(R) ∪ {?} be a function where ?(R) is the set of ideals of R. We call a proper ideal I of R a φ-prime ideal if a, b ∈ R with ab ∈ I ? φ(I) implies a ∈ I or b ∈ I. So taking φ_?(J) = ? (resp., φ₀(J) = 0, φ₂(J) = J ²), a φ_?-prime ideal (resp., φ₀-prime ideal, φ₂-prime ideal) is a prime ideal (resp., weakly prime ideal, almost prime ideal). We show that φ-prime ideals enjoy analogs of many of the properties of prime ideals.     

Symplectic algebras and poisson algebras

Abstract

A ring R is called left P-injective if for every a ∈ R, aR = r(l(a)) where l( ? ) and r( ? ) denote left and right annihilators respectively. The ring R is called left GP-injective if for any 0 ≠ a ∈ R, there exists n > 0 such that a ⁿ  ≠ 0 and a ⁿ R = r(l(a ⁿ )). As a response to an open question on GP -injective rings, an example of a left GP-injective ring which is not left P-injective is given. It is also proved here that a ring R is left FP -injective if and only if every matrix ring 𝕄 _n (R) is left GP-injective.