A Generalization of Divided Domains and Its Connection to Weak Baer Going-Down Rings

Many results on going-down domains and divided domains are generalized to the context of rings with von Neumann regular total quotient rings. A (commutative unital) ring R is called regular divided if each P ∈ Spec(R)?(Max(R) ∩ Min(R)) is comparable with each principal regular ideal of R. Among rings having von Neumann regular total quotient rings, the regular divided rings are the pullbacks K× _K/P D where K is von Neumann regular, P ∈ Spec(K) and D is a divided domain. Any regular divided ring (for instance, regular comparable ring) with a von Neumann regular total quotient ring is a weak Baer going-down ring. If R is a weak Baer going-down ring and T is an extension ring with a von Neumann regular total quotient ring such that no regular element of R becomes a zero-divisor in T, then R ? T satisfies going-down. If R is a weak Baer ring and P ∈ Spec(R), then R + PR _(P) is a going-down ring if and only if R/P and R _P are going-down rings. The weak Baer going-down rings R such that Spec(R)?Min(R) has a unique maximal element are characterized in terms of the existence of suitable regular divided overrings.     

On Divisible and Torsionfree Modules

A ring R is called left P-coherent in case each principal left ideal of R is finitely presented. A left R-module M (resp. right R-module N) is called D-injective (resp. D-flat) if Ext¹(G, M) = 0 (resp. Tor₁(N, G) = 0) for every divisible left R-module G. It is shown that every left R-module over a left P-coherent ring R has a divisible cover; a left R-module M is D-injective if and only if M is the kernel of a divisible precover A → B with A injective; a finitely presented right R-module L over a left P-coherent ring R is D-flat if and only if L is the cokernel of a torsionfree preenvelope K → F with F flat. We also study the divisible and torsionfree dimensions of modules and rings. As applications, some new characterizations of von Neumann regular rings and PP rings are given.     

Regularity and Substructures of Hom

ABSTRACT

We define “regular” for maps in a Hom group. This notion specializes to the well-known notions of (Von Neumann) regular in rings and modules. A map f ∈ Hom _R (A,M) is regular if and only if Ker(f) ?^⊕ A and Im(f) ?^⊕ M. There exists a unique maximal regular End(M)-End(A)-submodule in Hom _R (A,M). We study regularity in Hom _R (A ₁ ⊕ A ₂, M ₁ ⊕ M ₂). The existence of a regular function Hom _R (A,M) implies the existence of projective summands of Hom _R (A,M) _{End R (A)} and of _{End R ( M )} Hom _R (A,M). We consider regularity in endomorphism rings, and generalize a theorem of Ware-Zelmanowitz. We examine connections between the maximum regular bimodule and other substructures of Hom, mention two generalizations of regularity, and raise some questions.     

On rings with associated elements

A principal right ideal of a ring is called uniquely generated if any two elements of the ring that generate the same principal right ideal must be right associated (i.e., if for all a,b in a ring R, aR = bR implies a = bu for some unit u of R). In the present paper, we study “uniquely generated modules” as a module theoretic version of “uniquely generated ideals,” and we obtain a characterization of a unit-regular endomorphism ring of a module in terms of certain uniquely generated submodules of the module among some other results: End(M) is unit-regular if and only if End(M) is regular and all M-cyclic submodules of a right R-module M are uniquely generated. We also consider the questions of when an arbitrary element of a ring is associated to an element with a certain property. For example, we consider this question for the ring R[x;σ]∕(xⁿ⁺¹), where R is a strongly regular ring with an endomorphism σ be an endomorphism of R.     

Simple-Direct-Projective Modules

In this paper, we introduce and study the dual notion of simple-direct-injective modules. Namely, a right R-module M is called simple-direct-projective if, whenever A and B are submodules of M with B simple and M/A ? B ?^⊕M, then A ?^⊕M. Several characterizations of simple-direct-projective modules are provided and used to describe some well-known classes of rings. For example, it is shown that a ring R is artinian and serial with J²(R) = 0 if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R-module is quasi-projective if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R -module is a D3-module. It is also shown that a ring R is uniserial with J²(R) = 0 if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R-module is a C3-module if and only if every simple-direct-injective right R -module is a D3-module.     

Universal Lying-Over Rings

A (commutative unital) ring R is said to satisfy universal lying-over (ULO) if each injective ring homomorphism R → T satisfies the lying-over property. If R satisfies ULO, then R = tq(R), the total quotient ring of R. If a reduced ring satisfies ULO, it also satisfies Property A. If a ring R = tq(R) satisfies Property A and each nonminimal prime ideal of R is an intersection of maximal ideals, R satisfies ULO. If 0 ≤ n ≤ ∞, there exists a reduced (resp., nonreduced) n-dimensional ring satisfying ULO. The A + B construction is used to show that if 2 ≤ n < ∞, there exists an n-dimensional reduced ring R such that R = tq(R), R satisfies Property A, but R does not satisfy ULO.     

Minimalities and Modules over Dedekind-Like Rings

We are interested in (right) modules M satisfying the following weak divisibility condition: If R is the underlying ring, then for every r ∈ R either Mr = 0 or Mr = M. Over a commutative ring, this is equivalent to say that M is connected with regular generics. Over arbitrary rings, modules which are “minimal” in several model theoretic senses satisfy this condition. In this article, we investigate modules with this weak divisibility property over Dedekind-like rings and over other related classes of rings.     

Properties of Modules and Rings Relative to Some Matrices

Let R be a ring and  _β×α(R) (?   _β×α(R)) the set of all β × α full (row finite) matrices over R where α and β ≥ 1 are two cardinal numbers. A left R-module M is said to be “injective relative” to a matrix A ? ?   _β×α(R) if every R-homomorphism from R ^(β) A to M extends to one from R ^(α) to M. It is proved that M is injective relative to A if and only if it is A-pure in every module which contains M as a submodule. A right R-module N is called flat relative to a matrix A ?  _β×α(R) if the canonical map μ: N? R ^(β) A → N ^α is a monomorphism. This extends the notion of (m, n)-flat modules so that n-projectivity, finitely projectivity, and τ-flatness can be redefined in terms of flatness relative to certain matrices. R is called left coherent relative to a matrix A ?  _β×α(R) if R ^(β) A is a left R-ML module. Some results on τ-coherent rings and (m, n)-coherent rings are extended.     

On (Semi)Regular Morphisms

Let M and N be right R-modules. Hom(M, N) is called regular if for each f ∈ Hom(M, N), there exists g ∈ Hom(N, M) such that f = fgf. Let [M, N] = Hom _R (M, N). We prove that if M is finitely generated, then [M, N] is regular if and only if every homomorphism M → N is locally split. In this article, we also study the substructures of Hom(M, N) such as the Jacobson radical J[M, N], the singular ideal Δ[M, N], and the co-singular ideal ?[M, N]. We prove several new results. The question is to characterize when the Jacobson radical is equal to the singular ideal Δ[M, N] or the co-singular ideal ?[M, N] under injectivity and projectivity.     

On the FIP Property for Extensions of Commutative Rings

ABSTRACT

A (unital) extension R ? T of (commutative) rings is said to have FIP (respectively be a minimal extension) if there are only finitely many (respectively no) rings S such that R ? S ? T. Transfer results for the FIP property for extensions of Nagata rings are obtained, including the following fact: if R ? T is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension, then R(X)?T(X) also is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension. The assertion obtained by replacing “is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension” with “has FIP” is valid if R is an infinite field but invalid if R is a finite field. A generalization of the Primitive Element Theorem is obtained by characterizing, for any field (more generally, any artinian reduced ring) R, the ring extensions R ? T which have FIP; and, if R is any field K, by describing all possible structures of the (necessarily minimal) ring extensions appearing in any maximal chain of intermediate rings between K and any such T. Transfer of the FIP and “minimal extension” properties is given for certain pullbacks, with applications to constructions such as CPI-extensions. Various sufficient conditions are given for a ring extension of the form R ? R[u], with u a nilpotent element, to have or not have FIP. One such result states that if R is a residually finite integral domain that is not a field and u is a nilpotent element belonging to some ring extension of R, then R ? R[u] has FIP if and only if (0 : u) ≠ 0. The rings R having only finitely many unital subrings are studied, with complete characterizations being obtained in the following cases: char(R)>0; R an integral domain of characteristic 0; and R a (module-)finite extension of ? which is not an integral domain. In particular, a ring of the last-mentioned type has only finitely many unital subrings if and only if (?:R)≠0. Some results are also given for the residually FIP property.     

On Strongly Clean Modules

An element of a ring R is called “strongly clean” if it is the sum of an idempotent and a unit that commute, and R is called “strongly clean” if every element of R is strongly clean. A module M is called “strongly clean” if its endomorphism ring End(M) is a strongly clean ring. In this article, strongly clean modules are characterized by direct sum decompositions, that is, M is a strongly clean module if and only if whenever M′⊕ B = A ₁⊕ A ₂ with M′? M, there are decompositions M′ = M ₁⊕ M ₂, B = B ₁⊕ B ₂, and A _i  = C _i ⊕ D _i (i = 1,2) such that M ₁⊕ B ₁ = C ₁⊕ D ₂ = M ₁⊕ C ₁ and M ₂⊕ B ₂ = D ₁⊕ C ₂ = M ₂⊕ C ₂.     

On finitely generated module whose first nonzero fitting ideal is maximal

Let R be a Noetherian ring and M be a finitely generated R-module. Let I(M) be the first nonzero Fitting ideal of M. The main result of this paper asserts that when I(M) = Q is a regular maximal ideal of R, then M?R∕Q⊕P, for some projective R-module P of constant rank if and only if T(M)?QM. As a consequence, it is shown that if M is an Artinian R-module and I(M) = Q is a regular maximal ideal of R, then M?R∕Q.     

Modules Whose t-Closed Submodules Have a Summand as a Complement

We define and investigate T ₁₁-type modules as a generalization of t-extending modules, and modules satisfying C ₁₁ condition. A module M is said to be T ₁₁-type if every t-closed submodule of M has a complement which is a direct summand. Direct sums of T ₁₁-type modules inherit the property. Some equivalent conditions for a module M to be T ₁₁-type are given. We characterize a module M for which every direct summand satisfies T ₁₁ condition. If R _R is T ₁₁-type, then R/Z ₂(R _R ) is a C ₂ ring if and only if it is a von Neumann regular ring. Applying this result, we characterize a right t-extending (resp., finitely Σ-t-extending, or Σ-t-extending) ring R for which R/Z ₂(R _R ) is von Neumann regular.     

Rings with Zassenhaus Families of Ideals

Let R be a ring with identity. We call a family ? of left ideals of R a Zassenhaus family if the only additive endomorphisms of R that leave all members of ? invariant are the left multiplications by elements of R. Moreover, if R is torsion-free and there is some left R-module M such that R ? M ? R?_?? and End _?(M) = R we call R a “Zassenhaus ring”. It is well known that all Zassenhaus rings have Zassenhaus families. We will give examples to show that the converse does not hold even for torsion-free rings of finite rank.     

Semiregular Modules with Respect to a Fully Invariant Submodule

Abstract

Let M be a left R-module and F a submodule of M for any ring R. We call M F-semiregular if for every x ∈ M, there exists a decomposition M = A ⊕ B such that A is projective, A ≤ Rx and Rx ∩ B ≤ F. This definition extends several notions in the literature. We investigate some equivalent conditions to F-semiregular modules and consider some certain fully invariant submodules such as Z(M), Soc(M), δ(M). We prove, among others, that if M is a finitely generated projective module, then M is quasi-injective if and only if M is Z(M)-semiregular and M ⊕ M is CS. If M is projective Soc(M)-semiregular module, then M is semiregular. We also characterize QF-rings R with J(R)² = 0.     

Minimal Overrings of an Integrally Closed Domain

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to characterize minimal overrings of an integrally closed domain R. We show that there exists a strong relationship between minimal overrings and the notion of ideal transforms. In particular, we prove that if T(M) = S(M) for each maximal ideal M, then there is a bijective correspondence between the set of invertible maximal ideals of R and the set of minimal overrings of R. This study enables us to produce several interesting applications concerning semi-local, Dedekind, Prüferian and Krull domains. Moreover, we investigate the spectrum of a minimal overring in comparison with the spectrum of R, and we determine whether the polynomial ring R[X ₁, X ₂,…, X _n ] has a minimal overring.     

Zero-Divisors,Torsion Elements,and Unions of Annihilators

Let R be a commutative ring and M be a nonzero R-module. Now Z(M) = {r ∈ R | rm = 0 for some 0 ≠ m ∈ M} is a union of prime ideals of R and T(M) = {m ∈ M | rm = 0 for some 0 ≠ r ∈ R} is a union of prime submodules of M if M ≠ T(M). We investigate representations of Z(M) and T(M) as unions of primes each of which is a union of annihilators.     

Strongly Duo Modules and Rings

An R-module M is called strongly duo if Tr(N, M) = N for every N ≤ M _R . Several equivalent conditions to being strongly duo are given. If M _R is strongly duo and reduced, then End _R (M) is a strongly regular ring and the converse is true when R is a Dedekind domain and M _R is torsion. Over certain rings, nonsingular strongly duo modules are precisely regular duo modules. If R is a Dedekind domain, then M _R is strongly duo if and only if either M ≈ R or M _R is torsion and duo. Over a commutative ring, strongly duo modules are precisely pq-injective duo modules and every projective strongly duo module is a multiplication module. A ring R is called right strongly duo if R _R is strongly duo. Strongly regular rings are precisely reduced (right) strongly duo rings. A ring R is Noetherian and all of its factor rings are right strongly duo if and only if R is a serial Artinian right duo ring.     

On ADS Modules and Rings

A right module M over a ring R is said to be ADS if for every decomposition M = S ⊕ T and every complement T′ of S, we have M = S ⊕ T′. In this article, we study and provide several new characterizations of this new class of modules. We prove that M is semisimple if and only if every module in σ[M] is ADS. SC and SI rings also characterized by the ADS notion. A ring R is right SC-ring if and only if every 2-generated singular R-module is ADS.     

Generalized Stable Regular Rings

Abstract

In this paper we show that a regular ring R is a generalized stable ring if and only if for every x ∈ R, there exist a w ∈ K(R) and a group G in R such that wx ∈ G. Also we show that if R is a generalized stable regular ring, then for any A ∈ M _n (R), there exist right invertible matrices U ₁, U ₂ ∈ M _n (R) and left invertible matrices V ₁, V ₂ ∈ M _n (R) such that U ₁ V ₁ AU ₂ V ₂ = diag(e ₁,…, e _n ) for some idempotents e ₁,…, e _n  ∈ R.