The cancellation property of rings

A ring R is said to have the finitely generated cancellation property provided that the module isomorphism R⊕B?R⊕C implies B?C for any finitely generated R-modules B and C. It is proved that R has this property is equivalent to the existence of the cancellation matrices over R. Moreover, the structure of such matrices is investigated and finite weakly stable rings are characterized in terms of their cancellation matrices.     

Commutative rings whose proper ideals are direct sums of uniform modules

An interesting result, obtaining by some theorems of Asano, Köthe and Warfield, states that: “for a commutative ring R, every module is a direct sum of uniform modules if and only if R is an Artinian principal ideal ring.” Moreover, it is observed that: “every ideal of a commutative ring R is a direct sum of uniform modules if and only if R is a finite direct product of uniform rings.” These results raise a natural question: “What is the structure of commutative rings whose all proper ideals are direct sums of uniform modules?” The goal of this paper is to answer this question. We prove that for a commutative ring R, every proper ideal is a direct sum of uniform modules, if and only if, R is a finite direct product of uniform rings or R is a local ring with the unique maximal ideal ? of the form ? = U⊕S, where U is a uniform module and S is a semisimple module. Furthermore, we determine the structure of commutative rings R for which every proper ideal is a direct sum of cyclic uniform modules (resp., cocyclic modules). Examples which delineate the structures are provided.     

Simple-Direct-Projective Modules

In this paper, we introduce and study the dual notion of simple-direct-injective modules. Namely, a right R-module M is called simple-direct-projective if, whenever A and B are submodules of M with B simple and M/A ? B ?^⊕M, then A ?^⊕M. Several characterizations of simple-direct-projective modules are provided and used to describe some well-known classes of rings. For example, it is shown that a ring R is artinian and serial with J²(R) = 0 if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R-module is quasi-projective if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R -module is a D3-module. It is also shown that a ring R is uniserial with J²(R) = 0 if and only if every simple-direct-projective right R-module is a C3-module if and only if every simple-direct-injective right R -module is a D3-module.     

On Strongly Clean Modules

An element of a ring R is called “strongly clean” if it is the sum of an idempotent and a unit that commute, and R is called “strongly clean” if every element of R is strongly clean. A module M is called “strongly clean” if its endomorphism ring End(M) is a strongly clean ring. In this article, strongly clean modules are characterized by direct sum decompositions, that is, M is a strongly clean module if and only if whenever M′⊕ B = A ₁⊕ A ₂ with M′? M, there are decompositions M′ = M ₁⊕ M ₂, B = B ₁⊕ B ₂, and A _i  = C _i ⊕ D _i (i = 1,2) such that M ₁⊕ B ₁ = C ₁⊕ D ₂ = M ₁⊕ C ₁ and M ₂⊕ B ₂ = D ₁⊕ C ₂ = M ₂⊕ C ₂.     

Utumi modules

A right R-module M is called a U-module if, whenever A and B are submodules of M with A?B and A ∩ B = 0, there exist two summands K and L of M such that A?^essK, B?^essL and K⊕L?^⊕M. The class of U-modules is a simultaneous and strict generalization of three fundamental classes of modules; namely, the quasi-continuous, the square-free, and the automorphism-invariant modules. In this paper we show that the class of U-modules inherits some of the important features of the aforementioned classes of modules. For example, a U-module M is clean if and only if it has the finite exchange property, if and only if it has the full exchange property. As an immediate consequence, every strongly clean U-module has the substitution property and hence is Dedekind-finite. In particular, the endomorphism ring of a strongly clean U-module has stable range 1.     

Tree Oriented Pullback

Given two epimorphisms of algebras A ? B and C ? B, we consider the pullback R. We introduce a particular class of algebras, the tree oriented pullback, where there is a close relationship between the category of indecomposable modules of these algebras. This leads us to prove that if A and C are hereditary algebras, then R is a tilted algebra.     

Simple-direct-modules

A right R-module M is called simple-direct-injective if, whenever, A and B are simple submodules of M with A?B, and B?^⊕M, then A?^⊕M. Dually, M is called simple-direct-projective if, whenever, A and B are submodules of M with M∕A?B?^⊕M and B simple, then A?^⊕M. In this paper, we continue our investigation of these classes of modules strengthening many of the established results on the subject. For example, we show that a ring R is uniserial (artinian serial) with J²(R) = 0 iff every simple-direct-projective right R-module is an SSP-module (SIP-module) iff every simple-direct-injective right R-module is an SIP-module (SSP-module).     

Gorenstein Homological Dimension with Respect to a Semidualizing Module and a Generalization of a Theorem of Bass

Let C be a semidualizing module for a commutative ring R. In this paper, we study the resulting modules of finite G _C -projective dimension in Bass class, showing that they admit G _C -projective precover. Over local ring, we prove that dim _R (M) ≤ 𝒢? _C  ? id _R (M) for any nonzero finitely generated R-module M, which generalizes a result due to Bass.     

Separativity of Regular Rings in Which 2 Is Invertible

A regular ring R is separative provided that for all finitely generated projective right R-modules A and B, A⊕ A? A⊕ B? A⊕ B implies that A? B. We prove, in this article, that a regular ring R in which 2 is invertible is separative if and only if each a ∈ R satisfying R(1 ? a ²)R = Rr(a) = ?(a)R and i(End _R (aR)) = ∞ is unit-regular if and only if each a ∈ R satisfying R(1 ? a ²)R ∩ RaR = Rr(a) ∩ ?(a)R ∩ RaR and i(End _R (aR)) = ∞ is unit-regular. Further equivalent characterizations of such regular rings are also obtained.     

Weak Global Dimension of Coherent Rings

In this article, we study the weak global dimension of coherent rings in terms of the left FP-injective resolutions of modules. Let R be a left coherent ring and ? ? the class of all FP-injective left R-modules. It is shown that wD(R) ≤ n (n ≥ 1) if and only if every nth ? ?-syzygy of a left R-module is FP-injective; and wD(R) ≤ n (n ≥ 2) if and only if every (n ? 2)th ? ?-syzygy in a minimal ? ?-resolution of a left R-module has an FP-injective cover with the unique mapping property. Some results for the weak global dimension of commutative coherent rings are also given.     

Rational Modules for Corings

Abstract

The so called dense pairings were studied mainly by Radford in his work on coreflexive coalegbras over fields. They were generalized in a joint paper with Gómez-Torricillas and Lobillo to the so called rational pairings over a commutative ground ring R to study the interplay between the comodules of an R-coalgebra C and the modules of an R-algebra A that admits an R-algebra morphism κ : A → C*. Such pairings, satisfying the so called α-condition, were called in the author's dissertation measuring α-pairings and can be considered as the corner stone in his study of duality theorems for Hopf algebras over commutative rings. In this paper we lay the basis of the theory of rational modules of corings extending results on rational modules for coalgebras to the case of arbitrary ground rings. We apply these results mainly to categories of entwined modules (e.g., Doi-Koppinen modules, alternative Doi-Koppinen modules) generalizing results of Doi, Koppinen, Menini et al.     

On the FIP Property for Extensions of Commutative Rings

ABSTRACT

A (unital) extension R ? T of (commutative) rings is said to have FIP (respectively be a minimal extension) if there are only finitely many (respectively no) rings S such that R ? S ? T. Transfer results for the FIP property for extensions of Nagata rings are obtained, including the following fact: if R ? T is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension, then R(X)?T(X) also is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension. The assertion obtained by replacing “is a (module-) finite minimal ring extension” with “has FIP” is valid if R is an infinite field but invalid if R is a finite field. A generalization of the Primitive Element Theorem is obtained by characterizing, for any field (more generally, any artinian reduced ring) R, the ring extensions R ? T which have FIP; and, if R is any field K, by describing all possible structures of the (necessarily minimal) ring extensions appearing in any maximal chain of intermediate rings between K and any such T. Transfer of the FIP and “minimal extension” properties is given for certain pullbacks, with applications to constructions such as CPI-extensions. Various sufficient conditions are given for a ring extension of the form R ? R[u], with u a nilpotent element, to have or not have FIP. One such result states that if R is a residually finite integral domain that is not a field and u is a nilpotent element belonging to some ring extension of R, then R ? R[u] has FIP if and only if (0 : u) ≠ 0. The rings R having only finitely many unital subrings are studied, with complete characterizations being obtained in the following cases: char(R)>0; R an integral domain of characteristic 0; and R a (module-)finite extension of ? which is not an integral domain. In particular, a ring of the last-mentioned type has only finitely many unital subrings if and only if (?:R)≠0. Some results are also given for the residually FIP property.     

On weakly prime radical of modules and semi-compatible modules

Summary Let M be a left R-module. Then a proper submodule P of M is called weakly prime submodule if for any ideals A and B of R and any submodule N of M such that ABN ⊆ P, we have AN ⊆ P or BN ⊆ P. We define weakly prime radicals of modules and show that for Ore domains, the study of weakly prime radicals of general modules reduces to that of torsion modules. We determine the weakly prime radical of any module over a commutative domain R with dim (R) ≦ 1. Also, we show that over a commutative domain R with dim (R) ≦ 1, every semiprime submodule of any module is an intersection of weakly prime submodules. Localization of a module over a commutative ring preserves the weakly prime property. An R-module M is called semi-compatible if every weakly prime submodule of M is an intersection of prime submodules. Also, a ring R is called semi-compatible if every R-module is semi-compatible. It is shown that any projective module over a commutative ring is semi-compatible and that a commutative Noetherian ring R is semi-compatible if and only if for every prime ideal B of R, the ring R/\B is a Dedekind domain. Finally, we show that if R is a UFD such that the free R-module R⊕ R is a semi-compatible module, then R is a Bezout domain.     

The cancellable range of rings

We unify the cancellation property of rings with stable range one and the principal ideal domain by introducing a new notion which is called “cancellable range”. It is proved that if a ring R has cancellable range n for some positive integer n, then for any n-generated module B and any module implies B ≅ C; if R is a Noetherian ring and R has cancellable range n for any n ≧ 1, then R has the cancellation property. Received: 16 November 2004     

Examples of Generic Lattice Ideals of Codimension 3

A commutative ring R is said to be strongly Hopfian if the chain of annihilators ann(a) ? ann(a ²) ? … stabilizes for each a ∈ R. In this article, we are interested in the class of strongly Hopfian rings and the transfer of this property from a commutative ring R to the ring of the power series R[[X]]. We provide an example of a strongly Hopfian ring R such that R[[X]] is not strongly Hopfian. We give some necessary and sufficient conditions for R[[X]] to be strongly Hopfian.     

When Essential Extensions of Finitely Generated Modules are Finitely Generated

For certain classes 𝒞 of R-modules, including singular modules or modules with locally Krull dimensions, it is investigated when every module in 𝒞 with a finitely generated essential submodule is finitely generated. In case 𝒞 = Mod-R, this means E(M)/M is Noetherian for any finitely generated module M_R. Rings R with latter property are studied and shown that they form a class 𝒬 properly between the class of pure semisimple rings and the class of certain max rings. Duo rings in 𝒬 are precisely Artinian rings. If R is a quasi continuous ring in 𝒬 then R ? A ⊕ T where A is a semisimple Artinian ring and T ∈ 𝒬 with Z(T_T) ≤_ess T_T.     

Module valuations and representation theory of orders I: Algebraic aspects

ABSTRACT

In this article, we study finitely generated reflexive modules over coherent GCD-domains and finitely generated projective modules over polynomial rings. In particular, we give a sufficient condition for a finitely generated reflexive module over a coherent GCD-domain to be a free module. By use of this result, we prove that every finitely generated projective R + [X]-module can be extended from R if R is a commutative ring with gl.dim(R) ≤ 2.