Absolute stability of a stochastic integro-differential system

A stochastic integro-differential system (1) $\text{x}\text{?}\text{(t, ω) = A(ω) X(t, ω) + ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{B(t ? s, ω) X(s, ω) ds + b(ω) Φ(σ(t, ω))}\text{subject to}\text{σ(t, ω) = 〈c(ω), X(t, ω)〉, t ? 0}$ is considered where the integrals are interpreted as Bochner integrals. Existence and absolute stability of random solutions of (1) are studied.     

A note on a problem of Erdös and Hajnal

In [5], Erdös and Hajnal formulate the following proposition, which we shall refer to as Φ: If ? is an order-type such that $\text{|?| = ω}{}_2\text{but}\text{ω}{}_2\text{, ω}{}_2{}^1\text{? ?}$, there is ψ ? ?, |ψ| = ω₁, such that $\text{ω}{}_1\text{, ω}{}_1{}^1\text{? ψ}$. In [2], we showed that if V = L, then ?Φ. We do not know if the assumption V = L can be weakened to CH, or if, in fact, Φ is consistent with CH. However, in this note we show that, relative to a certain large cardinal assumption, Φ is consistent with 2^ω = ω₂, so that ?Φ is not provable in ZFC alone. Our proof has an interesting model-theoretic consequence, which we mention at the end.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

On the L2-stability of a class of nonlinear systems

Sufficient conditions are given for the L₂-stability of a class of feedback systems consisting of a linear operator G and a nonlinear gain function, either odd monotone or restricted by a power-law, in cascade, in a negative feedback loop. The criterion takes the form of a frequency-domain inequality, Re[1 + Z(jω)] G(jω) ? δ > 0 ?ω? (?∞, +∞), where Z(jω) is given by, Z(jω) = β[Y₁(jω) + Y₂(jω)] + (1 ? β)[Y₃(jω) ? Y₃(?jω)], with 0 ? β ? 1 and the functions y₁(·), y₂(·) and y₃(·) satisfying the time-domain inequalities, $\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{+\infty }}\text{¦y}{}_1\text{(t) + y}{}_2\text{(t)¦ dt ? 1 ? ?, y}{}_1\text{(·) = 0, t < 0}$, y₂(·) = 0, t > 0 and ? > 0, and $\text{∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦y}{}_3\text{(t)¦ dt <}\text{1}\text{2c}{}_2$, c₂ being a constant depending on the order of the power-law restricting the nonlinear function. The criterion is derived using Zames' passive operator theory and is shown to be more general than the existing criteria.     

A trial phase function method for a class of λ-ω reaction-diffusion systems: Reduction to a Schrödinger type problem in an eigen sub-domain

The perturbed central force problem $\text{γ}{}_{\mathrm{xx}}\text{? ?}{}^2\text{γ}\text{a}\text{?}{}^2\text{+ γλ(γ) = 0, γ}\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{+ 2}\text{a}\text{?}\text{γ}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{+ γ[}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw(γ}{}^1\text{) ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw(γ)] = 0}$ arising from the λ-ω system

$\text{α}\text{αt}\text{C}{}_1\text{C}{}_2\text{=}\text{λ}\text{?ω}\text{ω}\text{λ}\text{C}{}_1\text{C}{}_2\text{+}\text{α}\text{αt}\text{C}{}_1\text{C}{}_2$

where $\text{c}{}_1\text{=}\text{γ}\text{(x)cosθ(x,t), c}{}_2\text{=}\text{γ}\text{(x)sinθ(x,t), θ = σt ? ?∝}{}^{\mathrm{x}}\text{a}\text{?}\text{(x′)dx′}\text{and}\text{ω = ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw(}\text{γ}\text{)}$ is considered for the class $\text{λ}\text{=}\text{}\text{?}\text{gw}\text{= 1 ? g(}\text{γ}\text{)}$. The resulting linear equation in $\text{γ(x), γ}{}_{\mathrm{xx}}\text{+ 2}\text{a}\text{?}\text{γ}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{+}\text{γ[α}{}^2\text{+}\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{?}\text{?}{}^2\text{a}\text{?}{}^2\text{] = 0}$ is solved with the aid of a class of trial phase functions $\text{a}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{(x)}$ generated by the unperturbed central force problem for the case g(γ) = γ². An application of the Liouville-Green approximation procedure reduces the system to a Schrödinger type boundary value problem in an eigen sub-domain. The analytical estimates for α are in reasonable agreement with the results of numerical integration of the nonlinear system. The eigenfunctions γ(x) display expected oscillatory behaviour inside an eigen sub-domain. The higher modes and the span of the most extended centre structure are estimated and interpreted in the context of WKBJ connection formula.     

A remark to the preceding paper by Chernoff

It is shown that the method of Chernoff developed in the preceding paper can be modified to prove the essential self-adjointness on C₀^∞(R^m) of all positive powers of the Schrödinger operator T = ? Δ + q if q real and in C^∞(R^m) and if $\text{T ? ?a ? b ¦ x ¦}{}^2\text{on}\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}$.     

Subproper splitting for rectangular matrices

In this paper iterative schemes for approximating a solution to a rectangular but consistent linear system Ax = b are studied. Let A?C^{m × n}_r. The splitting A = M ? N is called subproper if R(A) ? R(M) and $\text{R(A}{}^1\text{) ?R(M}{}^1\text{)}$. Consider the iteration $\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= M}{}^2\text{Nx}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+ M}{}^2\text{b}$. We characterize the convergence of this scheme to a solution of the linear system. When A?R^m×ⁿ_r, monotonicity and the concept of subproper regular splitting are used to determine a necessary and a sufficient condition for the scheme to converge to a solution.     

Calculation of the eigenvalues of Schrödinger equations by an extension of Hill's method

The eigenfunctions of the one dimensional Schrödinger equation Ψ″ + [E ? V(x)]Ψ=0, where V(x) is a polynomial, are represented by expansions of the form $\text{∑}\text{k}\text{=0}\text{∞}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>c</mtext>}}\text{k}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{k}\text{(ω,}\text{x}\text{)}$. The functions ?_k (ω, x) are chosen in such a way that recurrence relations hold for the coefficients c_k: examples treated are D_k(ωx) (Weber-Hermite functions), exp (?ωx²)x^k, exp (?cx^q)D_k(ωx). From these recurrence relations, one considers an infinite bandmatrix whose finite square sections permit to solve approximately the original eigenproblem. It is then shown how a good choice of the parameter ω may reduce dramatically the complexity of the computations, by a theoretical study of the relation holding between the error on an eigenvalue, the order of the matrix, and the value of ω. The paper contains tables with 10 significant figures of the 30 first eigenvalues corresponding to V(x) = x^2m, m = 2(1)7, and the 6 first eigenvalues corresponding to V(x) = x² + λx¹⁰ and x² + λx¹², λ = .01(.01).1(.1)1(1)10(10)100.     

Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

Counting subsets of the random partition and the ‘Brownian Bridge’ process

Let Ω_m be the set of partitions, ω, of a finite m-element set; induce a uniform probability distribution on Ω_m, and define X_ms(ω) as the number of s-element subsets in ω. We alow the existence of an integer-valued function n=n^(m)(t), t?[0, 1], and centering constants b_ms, 0?s? m, such that

$\text{Z}{}^{\mathrm{(m)}}\text{(t)=}\text{∑}\text{s=0}\text{n(m)(t)}\text{(X}{}_{\mathrm{ms}}\text{?b}{}_{\mathrm{ms}}\text{)}\text{√}\text{∑}\text{s=0}\text{m}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{ms}}$

converges to the ‘Brownian Bridge’ process in terms of its finite-dimensional distributions.     

Coding theory in white Gaussian channel with feedback

The message m = {m(t)} is a Gaussian process that is to be transmitted through the white Gaussian channel with feedback: $\text{Y(t) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{F(s, Y}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{, m)ds + W(t)}$. Under the average power constraint, $\text{E[F}{}^2\text{(s, Y}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{, m)] ≤ P}{}_0$, we construct causally the optimal coding, in the sense that the mutual information I_t(m, Y) between the message m and the channel output Y (up to t) is maximized. The optimal coding is presented by $\text{Y(t) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{A(s)[m(s) ?}\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s)] ds + W(t)}$, where $\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s) = E[m(s) ¦ Y(u), 0 ≤ u ≤ s]}$ and A(s) is a positive function such that $\text{A}{}^2\text{(s) E |m(s) ?}\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s)|}{}^2\text{= P}{}_0$.     

Positive definite distributions on K\GK

Let G be a semisimple noncompact Lie group with finite center and let K be a maximal compact subgroup. Then W. H. Barker has shown that if T is a positive definite distribution on G, then T extends to Harish-Chandra's Schwartz space $\text{C}$¹(G). We show that the corresponding property is no longer true for the space of double cosets $\text{K}\text{G}\text{K}$. If G is of real-rank 1, we construct liner functionals $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{? (C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{))′}$ for each p, 0 < p ? 2, such that $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$ but T_p does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. In particular, if p ? 1, T_v does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^1\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. We use this to answer a question (in the negative) raised by Barker whether for a K-bi-invariant distribution T on G to be positive definite it is enough to verify that $\text{T(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. The main tool used is a theorem of Trombi-Varadarajan.     

Series inversion of some convolution transforms

We study degeneration for ? → + 0 of the two-point boundary value problems

$\text{τ?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{u := ?((au′)′ + bu′ + cu) ± xu′ ? κu = h, u(±1) = A ± B}$

, and convergence of the operators T_?⁺ and T_?^? on $\text{L}$²(?1, 1) connected with them, T_?^±u := τ_?^±u for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{, D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ u″ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}, T}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{u: = xu′}$

for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{), D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ xu′ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}}$

. Here ? is a small positive parameter, λ a complex “spectral” parameter; a, b and c are real $\text{b}$^∞-functions, a(x) ? γ > 0 for all x? [?1, 1] and h is a sufficiently smooth complex function. We prove that the limits of the eigenvalues of T_?⁺ and of T_?^? are the negative and nonpositive integers respectively by comparison of the general case to the special case in which a  1 and b  c  0 and in which we can compute the limits exactly. We show that (T_?⁺ ? λ)^?1 converges for ? → +0 strongly to (T₀⁺ ? λ)^?1 if $\text{R e λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. In an analogous way, we define the operator T_?⁺, n (n ? $\text{N}$ in the Sobolev space H₀^?n(? 1, 1) as a restriction of τ_?⁺ and prove strong convergence of (T⁺_?,n ? λ)^?1 for ? → +0 in this space of distributions if $\text{R e λ > ?n ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. With aid of the maximum principle we infer from this that, if h?$\text{C}$¹, the solution of τ_?⁺u ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B converges for ? → +0 uniformly on [?1, ? ?] ∪ [?, 1] to the solution of xu′ ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B for each p > 0 and for each λ ? $\text{C}$ if ? ?$\text{N}$.Finally we prove by duality that the solution of τ_?^?u ? λu = h converges to a definite solution of the reduced equation uniformly on each compact subset of (?1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) if h is sufficiently smooth and if 1 ? ?$\text{N}$.     

On solutions of “equations in symmetric groups”

Let x?S_n, the symmetric group on n symbols. Let θ? Aut(S_n) and let the automorphim order of x with respect to θ be defined by

$\text{γθ(x)=}\text{min}\text{{k:x xθ xθ}{}^2\text{? xθ}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{=1}}$

where xθ is the image of x under θ. Let α_g? Aut(S_n) denote conjugation by the element g?S_n. Let where s and k are positive integers and $\text{a}\text{b}$ denotes a divides b. Further h(s, k : n) ≡ b(1; s, k : n), where 1 denotes the identity automorphim. If g?S_n let c = f(g, s) denote the number of symbols in g which are in cycles of length not dividing the integer s, and let g_s denote the product of all cycles in g whose lengths do not divide s. Then g_s moves c symbols. The main results proved are: (1) recursion: if n ? c + 1 and t = n ? c ? 1 then $\text{b(g; s, 1:n)=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>i</mtext><mtext>s</mtext>}}\text{b(g; s, 1:n?1)(}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(i?1)!}$ (2) reduction: b(g; s, 1 : c)h(s, 1 : i) = b(g; s, 1 : i + c); (3) distribution: let D(θ, n) ≡ {(k, b) : k?Z⁺ and b = b(θ; 1, k : n) ≠ 0}; then D(θ, m) = D(φ, m) ∨ m ? N = N(θ, φ) iff θ is conjugate to φ; (4) evaluation: the number of cycles in g_s^s of any given length is smaller than the smallest prime dividing s iff b(g_s; s, 1 : c) = 1. If g = (12 … p^m)^t and $\text{sk}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ then $\text{b(g;s,k:p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{) {}{}^0{}_{\mathrm{\pm 1}}\text{(}\text{mod}\text{p)}$.     

About some problems of spectral synthesis

For a given pair $\text{(A,b)∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times n}}\text{×}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$ such that A is cyclic and b is a cyclic generator (with respect to A) of $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$, it is shown that for every nonnegative integer m we can find a nonnegative integer t and a sequence $\text{{f}{}_{\mathrm{j\}}}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{,f}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{1\times n}}$,so that a the zeros of the rational function det P(z), where $\text{P(z) = zI ? A ? ∑}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{-(m+j)}}\text{b?}$_f, lie in the open unit disc in the complex plane. The result is directly applicable to a stabilizability problem for linear systems with a time delay in control action.     

On the probability that k positive integers are relatively prime II

Given a set S of positive integers let $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t)}$ denote the number of k-tuples 〈m₁, …, m_k〉 for which $\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{∈ S ? [1, t]}$ and (m₁, …, m_k) = 1. Also let $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n)}$ denote the probability that k integers, chosen at random from $\text{S ? [1, n]}$, are relatively prime. It is shown that if P = {p₁, …, p_r} is a finite set of primes and S = {m : (m, p₁ … p_r) = 1}, then $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{\nu ?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) + O(t}{}^{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{)}$ if k ≥ 3 and $\text{Z}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(t) = (td(S))}{}^2\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^2\text{) + O(t}\text{log}\text{t)}$ where d(S) denotes the natural density of S. From this result it follows immediately that $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → Π}{}_{\mathrm{p?P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{) = (ζ(k))}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Π}{}_{\mathrm{p\in P}}\text{(1 ?}\text{1}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ as n → ∞. This result generalizes an earlier result of the author's where $\text{P = ?}$ and S is then the whole set of positive integers. It is also shown that if S = {p₁^x₁ … p_r^x_r : x_i = 0, 1, 2,…}, then $\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{S}}\text{(n) → 0}$ as n → ∞.     

Diagonal forms over finite fields

We shall establish for all finite fields GF(pⁿ) the following result of Chowla: given a positive integer m greater than one and the finite field GF(p), p a prime, such that x^m = ?1 is solvable in GF(p), then there exists an absolute positive constant c, $\text{c ≤}\text{10}\text{ln}\text{2}$, such that for each set of s nonzero elements a_i of GF(p), $\text{a}{}_1\text{x}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{+ ? + a}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$ has a non-trivial zero in GF(p) if s ≥ c ln m.     

γ-sets and other singular sets of real numbers

A family of $\text{J}$ of open subsets of the real line is called an ω-cover of a set X iff every finite subset of X is contained in an element of $\text{J}$. A set of reals X is a γ-set iff for every ω-cover $\text{J}$ of X there exists $\text{〈D}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{: n < ω〉?}\text{J}{}^{\mathrm{\omega }}$ such that

In this paper we show that assuming Martin's axiom there is a γ-set X of cardinality the continuum.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators

The operator $\text{L?(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ acting on H=∝₀^2π⊕L²(v_t), where m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π are measures on [0, 2π] with m smooth and e(s, t) = exp[?∝_t^s∝_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ)], satisfies $\text{rank}\text{(I ? LL}{}^1\text{) =}\text{rank}\text{(I ? L}{}^1\text{L) = 1}$. It is, therefore, unitarily equivalent to a scalar Sz.-Nagy-Foia? canonical model. The purpose of this paper is to determine the model explicitly and to give a formula for the unitary equivalence.