Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.     

Exploring the Reactivity of B-Connected Carboranylphosphines in Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry: A New Frame for a Classic System

The primary phosphines MesPH₂ and tBuPH₂ react with 9-iodo-m-carborane yielding B9-connected secondary carboranylphosphines 1,7-H₂C₂B₁₀H₉-9-PHR (R=2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂ (Mes; 1 a ), tBu ( 1 b )). Addition of tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF) to 1 a , b resulted in the zwitterionic compounds 1,7-H₂C₂B₁₀H₉-9-PHR(p-C₆F₄)BF(C₆F₅)₂ ( 2 a , b ) through nucleophilic para substitution of a C₆F₅ ring followed by fluoride transfer to boron. Further reaction with Me₂SiHCl prompted a H−F exchange yielding the zwitterionic compounds 1,7-H₂C₂B₁₀H₉-9-PHR(p-C₆F₄)BH(C₆F₅)₂ ( 3 a , b ). The reaction of 2 a , b with one equivalent of R'MgBr (R’=Me, Ph) gave the extremely water-sensitive frustrated Lewis pairs 1,7-H₂C₂B₁₀H₉-9-PR(p-C₆F₄)B(C₆F₅)₂ ( 4 a , b ). Hydrolysis of the B−C₆F₄ bond in 4 a , b gave the first tertiary B-carboranyl phosphines with three distinct substituents, 1,7-H₂C₂B₁₀H₉-9-PR(p-C₆F₄H) ( 5 a , b ). Deprotonation of the zwitterionic compounds 2 a , b and 3 a , b formed anionic phosphines [1,7-H₂C₂B₁₀H₉-9-PR(p-C₆F₄)BX(C₆F₅)₂]⁻[DMSOH]⁺ (R=Mes, X=F ( 6 a ), R=tBu, X=F ( 6 b ); R=Mes, X=H ( 7 a ), R=tBu, X=H ( 7 b )). Reaction of 2 a , b with an excess of Grignard reagents resulted in the addition of R’ at the boron atom yielding the anions [1,7-H₂C₂B₁₀H₉-9-PR(p-C₆F₄)BR’(C₆F₅)₂]⁻ (R=Mes, R’=Me ( 8 a ), R=tBu, R’=Me ( 8 b ); R=Mes, R’=Ph ( 9 a ), R=tBu, R’=Ph ( 9 b )) with [MgBr(Et₂O)_n]⁺ as counterion. The ability of the zwitterionic compounds 3 a , b to hydrogenate imines as well as the Brønsted acidity of 3 a were investigated.     

Über den Phosphandiyl‐Transfer von invers‐polarisierten Phosphaalkenen R1P=C(NMe2)2 (R1 = tBu,Cy, Ph,H) auf Phospheniumkomplexe [(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2M=P(R2)R3] (R2 = R3 = Ph; R2 = tBu,R3 = H; R2 = Ph,R3 = N(SiMe3)2)

Phosphanediyl Transfer from Inversely Polarized Phosphaalkenes R¹P=C(NMe₂)₂ (R¹ = tBu, Cy, Ph, H) onto Phosphenium Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂M=P(R²)R³] (R² = R³ = Ph; R² = tBu, R³ = H; R² = Ph, R³ = N(SiMe₃)₂) Reaction of the freshly prepared phosphenium tungsten complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W=PPh₂] ( 3 ) with the inversely polarized phosphaalkenes RP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1 ) ( a : R = tBu; b : Cy; c : Ph) led to the η²‐diphosphanyl complexes ( 9a‐c ) which were isolated by column chromatography as yellow crystals in 24‐30 % yield. Similarly, phosphenium complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂M=P(H)tBu] (M = W ( 6 ); Mo ( 8 )) were converted into (M = W ( 11 ); Mo ( 12 )) by the formal abstraction of the phosphanediyl [PtBu] from 1a . Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W=P(Ph)N(SiMe₃)₂] ( 4 ) with HP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1d ) gave rise to the formation of yellow crystalline ( 10 ). The products were characterized by elemental analyses and spectra (IR, ¹H, ¹³C‐, ³¹P‐NMR, MS). The molecular structure of compound 10 was elucidated by an X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Chiral Fluorinated α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Enantioselective Synthesis and Electrophilic Capture,Racemization Dynamics,and Structure

Enantiomerically pure triflones R¹CH(R²)SO₂CF₃ have been synthesized starting from the corresponding chiral alcohols via thiols and trifluoromethylsulfanes. Key steps of the syntheses of the sulfanes are the photochemical trifluoromethylation of the thiols with CF₃Hal (Hal=halide) or substitution of alkoxyphosphinediamines with CF₃SSCF₃. The deprotonation of RCH(Me)SO₂CF₃ (R=CH₂Ph, iHex) with nBuLi with the formation of salts [RC(Me)? SO₂CF₃]Li and their electrophilic capture both occurred with high enantioselectivities. Displacement of the SO₂CF₃ group of (S)‐MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)SO₂CF₃ (95 % ee) by an ethyl group through the reaction with AlEt₃ gave alkane MeOCH₂C(Me)(CH₂Ph)Et of 96 % ee. Racemization of salts [R¹C(R²)SO₂CF₃]Li follows first‐order kinetics and is mainly an enthalpic process with small negative activation entropy as revealed by polarimetry and dynamic NMR (DNMR) spectroscopy. This is in accordance with a C_α? S bond rotation as the rate‐determining step. Lithium α‐(S)‐trifluoromethyl‐ and α‐(S)‐nonafluorobutylsulfonyl carbanion salts have a much higher racemization barrier than the corresponding α‐(S)‐tert‐butylsulfonyl carbanion salts. Whereas [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂tBu]Li/DMPU (DMPU = dimethylpropylurea) has a half‐life of racemization at ?105 °C of 2.4 h, that of [PhCH₂C(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li at ?78 °C is 30 d. DNMR spectroscopy of amides (PhCH₂)₂NSO₂CF₃ and (PhCH₂)N(Ph)SO₂CF₃ gave N? S rotational barriers that seem to be distinctly higher than those of nonfluorinated sulfonamides. NMR spectroscopy of [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂R]M (M=Li, K, NBu₄; R=CF₃, tBu) shows for both salts a confinement of the negative charge mainly to the C_α atom and a significant benzylic stabilization that is weaker in the trifluoromethylsulfonyl carbanion. According to crystal structure analyses, the carbanions of salts {[PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li? L }₂ ( L =2 THF, tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA)) and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ have the typical chiral C_α? S conformation of α‐sulfonyl carbanions, planar C_α atoms, and short C_α? S bonds. Ab initio calculations of [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]^? and [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]^? showed for the fluorinated carbanion stronger n_C→σ* and n_O→σ* interactions and a weaker benzylic stabilization. According to natural bond orbital (NBO) calculations of [R¹C(R²)SO₂R]^? (R=tBu, CF₃) the n_C→σ*_{S? R} interaction is much stronger for R=CF₃. Ab initio calculations gave for [MeC(Ph)SO₂tBu]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,C_α contact ion pair (CIP) and for [MeC(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li ? 2 Me₂O an O,Li,O CIP. According to cryoscopy, [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]Li, [iHexC(Me)SO₂CF₃]Li, and [PhCH₂C(Ph)SO₂CF₃]NBu₄ predominantly form monomers in tetrahydrofuran (THF) at ?108 °C. The NMR spectroscopic data of salts [R¹(R²)SO₂R³]Li (R³=tBu, CF₃) indicate that the dominating monomeric CIPs are devoid of C_α? Li bonds.     

The Non-Ancillary Nature of Trimethylsilylamide Substituents in Boranes and Borinium Cations

The known boranes (R(Me₃Si)N)₂BF (R=Me₃Si 1 , tBu 2 , C₆F₅ 3 , o-tol 4 , Mes 5 , Dipp 6 ) and borinium salts (R(Me₃Si)N)₂B][B(C₆F₅)₄] (R=Me₃Si 7 , tBu 8 ) are prepared and fully characterized. Compound 7 is shown to react with phosphines to generate [R₃PSiMe₃]⁺ and [R₃PH]⁺ (R=Me, tBu). Efforts to generate related borinium cations via fluoride abstraction from (R(Me₃Si)N)₂BF (R=C₆F₅ 3 , o-tol 4 , Mes 5 ) gave complex mixtures suggesting multiple reaction pathways. However for R=Dipp 6 , the species [(μ-F)(SiMe₂N(Dipp))₂BMe][B(C₆F₅)₄] was isolated as the major product, indicating methyl abstraction from silicon and F/Me exchange on boron. These observations together with state-of-the-art DFT mechanistic studies reveal that the trimethylsilyl-substituents do not behave as ancillary subsitutents but rather act as sources of proton, SiMe₃ and methyl groups.     

Synthesis of a “Masked” Terminal Nickel(II) Sulfide by Reductive Deprotection and its Reaction with Nitrous Oxide

The addition of 1 equiv of KSCPh₃ to [L^RNiCl] (L^R={(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)NC(R)}₂CH; R=Me, tBu) in C₆H₆ results in the formation of [L^RNi(SCPh₃)] ( 1 : R=Me; 2 : R=tBu) in good yields. Subsequent reduction of 1 and 2 with 2 equiv of KC₈ in cold (?25 °C) Et₂O in the presence of 2 equiv of 18‐crown‐6 results in the formation of “masked” terminal Ni^II sulfides, [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^RNi(S)] ( 3 : R=Me; 4 : R=tBu), also in good yields. An X‐ray crystallographic analysis of these complexes suggests that they feature partial multiple‐bond character in their Ni? S linkages. Addition of N₂O to a toluene solution of 4 provides [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^tBuNi(SN?NO)], which features the first example of a thiohyponitrite (κ²‐[SN?NO]^2?) ligand.     

Polypropylene and poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐octene) effective synthesis with diamine‐bis(phenolate) complexes: Effect of complex structure on catalyst activity and product microstructure

A series of group 4 metal complexes bearing amine‐bis(phenolate) ligands with the amino side‐arm donor: (μ‐O)[Me₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂)₂ZrCl]₂ ( 1a ), R₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3‐R¹‐5‐R²‐C₆H₂)₂TiCl₂ (R = Me, R¹, R² = tBu ( 2a ), R = iPr, R¹, R² = tBu ( 2b ), R = iPr, R¹ = tBu, R² = OMe ( 2c )), and Me₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂)(CH₂‐2‐O‐C₆H₄)TiCl₂ ( 2d ) are used in ethylene and propylene homopolymerization, and ethylene/1‐octene copolymerization. All complexes, upon their activation with Al(iBu)₃/Ph₃CB(C₆F₅)₄, exhibit reasonable catalytic activity for ethylene homo‐ and copolymerization giving linear polyethylene with high to ultra‐high molecular weight (600·× 10³–3600·× 10³ g/mol). The activity of 1a /Al(iBu)₃/Ph₃CB(C₆F₅)₄ shows a positive comonomer effect, leading to over 400% increase of the polymer yield, while the addition of 1‐octene causes a slight reduction of the activity of the complexes 2a‐2d . The complexes with the NMe₂ donor group ( 2a , 2d , 1a ) display a high ability to incorporate a comonomer (up to 9–22 mol%), and the use of a bulkier donor group, N(iPr)₂ ( 2b , 2c ), results in a lower 1‐octene incorporation. All the produced copolymers reveal a broad chemical composition distribution. In addition, the investigated complexes polymerized propylene with the moderate ( 1a , 2a ) to low ( 2b‐2d ) activity, giving polymers with different microstructures, from purely atactic to isotactically enriched (mmmm = 28%). © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55, 2467–2476     

Sigma‐ versus Pi‐Koordination in Bis‐indenyl‐ und Bis‐2‐methallyl‐Imidokomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs: DF‐Rechnungen und Kristallstrukturanalyse

Sigma‐ versus Pi‐Coordination in Bis‐indenyl‐ and Bis‐2‐methallyl Imido Complexes of Hexavalent Molybdenum and Tungsten: DF‐Calculations and Crystal Structure Analysis Bis‐indenyl and bis‐2‐methallyl imido complexes [(C₉H₇)₂M(NR)₂] (M = Mo, W; R = tert‐butyl, mesityl) 1 — 4 and [(H₃C‐C₃H₄)₂M(NtBu)₂] (M = Mo, W) 6 , 7 have been prepared starting from [Mo(NtBu)₂Cl₂] or [M(NR)₂Cl₂L₂] (M = W, R = tBu, L = py; M = Mo, W, R = Mes, L₂ = dme) and indenyl lithium or 2‐methallyl magnesium bromide, respectively. According to spectroscopic data and the crystal structure of 4 there are two different coordination modes of the indenyl ligands, [(η³‐C₉H₇)M(NR)₂(η¹‐C₉H₇)], in solution as well as in the solid state. These compounds show fluxional rearrangements in solution, namely σ, π‐exchange of η¹‐ and η³‐coordinated ligands. Similar behavior has been observed for the 2‐methallyl complexes 6 and 7 in solution. In agreement with experimental observations, DF calculations on models of 6 strongly suggest a (σ+π)‐coordination mode of the η³‐coordinated ligand.     

Synthesis and Structure of (N,)C,N‐chelated Organoantimony(III) and Bismuth(III) Cations and Isolation of Their Adducts with Ag[CB11H12]

The treatment of N,C,N‐chelated antimony(III) and bismuth(III) chlorides [C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NR)₂]MCl₂ [R = tBu and M = Sb ( 1 ) or Bi ( 2 ); R = Dmp and M = Sb ( 3 ) or Bi ( 4 )] (Dmp = 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃) with one molar equivalent of Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] led to a smooth formation of corresponding ionic pairs {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NR)₂]MCl}⁺[CB₁₁H₁₂]^– [R = tBu and M = Sb ( 7 ) or Bi ( 8 ), R = Dmp and M = Sb ( 9 ) or Bi ( 10 )]. Similarly, the reaction of C,N‐chelated analogues [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH=NDip)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]MCl₂ [M = Sb ( 5 ) or Bi ( 6 ), Dip = 2′,6′‐iPr₂C₆H₃] gave compounds {[C₆H₂‐2‐(CH=NDip)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]MCl}⁺[CB₁₁H₁₂]^– [M = Sb ( 11 ) or Bi ( 12 )]. All compounds 7 – 12 were characterized with ¹H, ¹¹B and ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectroscopy, ESI‐mass spectrometry, IR spectroscopy, and molecular structures of 7 – 9 and 12 were determined by the help of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. In contrast, all attempts to cleave also the second M–Cl bond in 7 – 12 using another molar equivalent Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] remained unsuccessful. Nevertheless, the reaction between 7 (or 8 ) and Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] produced unprecedented adducts of both reagents namely {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NtBu)₂]SbCl}₂²⁺[Ag₂(CB₁₁H₁₂)₄]^2– ( 13 ) and {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NtBu)₂]BiCl}⁺[Ag(CB₁₁H₁₂)₂]^– ( 14 ) in a reproducible manner. The molecular structures of these sparingly soluble compounds were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Quasi‐living copolymerization of ethylene with 1‐hexene by heteroligated (salicylaldiminato β‐enaminoketonato) titanium complexes

A series of heteroligated (salicylaldiminato)(β‐enaminoketonato)titanium complexes [3‐Bu^t‐2‐OC₆H₃CH = N(C₆F₅)] [PhN = C(R₁)CHC(R₂)O]TiCl₂ [ 3a : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = ^tBu; 3b : R₁ = Me, R₂ = CF₃; 3c : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = Ph; 3d : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Ph(p ); 3e : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Ph(o ); 3f : R = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Cl(p ); 3g : R₁ = CF₃; R₂ = C₆H₃Cl₂(2,5); 3h : R₁ = CF₃, R₂ = C₆H₄Me(p )] were investigated as catalysts for ethylene (co)polymerization. In the presence of modified methylaluminoxane as a cocatalyst, these complexes showed activities about 50%–1000% and 10%–100% higher than their corresponding bis(β‐enaminoketonato) titanium complexes for ethylene homo‐ and ethylene/1‐hexene copolymerization, respectively. They produced high or moderate molecular weight copolymers with 1‐hexene incorporations about 10%–200% higher than their homoligated counterpart pentafluorinated FI‐Ti complex. Among them, complex 3b displayed the highest activity [2.06 × 10⁶ g/mol_Ti?h], affording copolymers with the highest 1‐hexene incorporations of 34.8 mol% under mild conditions. Moreover, catalyst 3h with electron‐donating group not only exhibited much higher 1‐hexene incorporations (9.0 mol% vs. 3.2 mol%) than pentafluorinated FI‐Ti complex but also generated copolymers with similar narrow molecular weight distributions (M _w/M _n = 1.20–1.26). When the 1‐hexene concentration in the feed was about 2.0 mol/L and the hexene incorporation of resultant polymer was about 9.0 mol%, a quasi‐living copolymerization behavior could be achieved. ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic analysis of their resulting copolymers demonstrated the possible copolymerization mechanism, which was related with the chain initiation, monomer insertion style, chain transfer and termination during the polymerization process. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55 , 2787–2797     

Ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes for the coordination and catalytic dehydrogenation of amine- and phosphine-boranes

Addition of the amine–boranes H₃B ? NH₂tBu, H₃B ? NHMe₂ and H₃B ? NH₃ to the cationic ruthenium fragment [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(OH₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; xantphos=4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene; BAr^F₄=[B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄]^?) affords the η¹‐B? H bound amine–borane complexes [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₂tBu)H][BAr^F₄] ( 5 ), [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NHMe₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 6 ) and [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₃)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 and 7 have been determined with [BAr^F₄] and [BPh₄] anions, respectively. Treatment of 2 with H₃B ? PHPh₂ resulted in quite different behaviour, with cleavage of the B? P interaction taking place to generate the structurally characterised bis‐secondary phosphine complex [Ru(xantphos)(PHPh₂)₂H][BPh₄] ( 9 ). The xantphos complexes 2 , 5 and 9 proved to be poor precursors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of H₃B ? NHMe₂. While the dppf species (dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) [Ru(dppf)(PPh₃)HCl] ( 3 ) and [Ru(dppf)(η⁶‐C₆H₅PPh₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 4 ) showed better, but still moderate activity, the agostic‐stabilised N‐heterocyclic carbene derivative [Ru(dppf)(ICy)HCl] ( 12 ; ICy=1,3‐dicyclohexylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) proved to be the most efficient catalyst with a turnover number of 76 h^?1 at room temperature.     

Reactions of 3-(Polyfluoroalkyl)propane-1,2,3-trione-2-oximes with Diaminoarenes

Novel quinoxaline derivatives have been synthesized via the reaction of 3-trifhioromethyl-1,2,3-propanetrione-2-oximes with 1,2-diaminobenzene or 2,3-diaminonaphthalene: 2-trifluoromethyl-3-aroylquinoxaline and 2-trifluoromethyl-3-aroylbenzo[g]quinoxaline. Under similar conditions, 3-R^F-1,2,3-propanetrione-2-oximes [R^F = C₃F₇, H(CF₂)₄, C₄F₉, and C₆F₁₃] with the same diaminoarenes have given a mixture of the condensation and fragmentation products in different ratios. The structure of (4-methylphenyl)[3-(tri-fluoromethyl)benzo[g]quinoxalin-2-yl]methanone has been elucidated by means of X-ray diffraction analysis.

     

A Widely Applicable Synthetic Approach to Alk‐1‐yn‐1‐yl(polyfluoroorganyl)‐iodonium Salts [(RC≡C)(R′)I][BF4]

The reaction of alkynyldifluoroboranes RC≡CBF₂ (R = (CH₃)₃C, CF₃, (CF₃)₂CF) with organyliodine difluoride R′IF₂ bearing electron‐withdrawing polyfluoroorganyl groups R′ = C₆F₅, (CF₃)₂CFCF=CF, C₄F₉, and CF₃CH₂ leads to the corresponding alkynyl(organyl)iodonium salts [(RC≡C)(R′)I][BF₄]. This approach uses a widely applicable method as demonstrated for a representative series of polyfluorinated aryl‐, alkenyl‐, and alkyliodine difluorides. Generally, these syntheses proceed with good yields and deliver pure iodonium salts. The distinct electrophilic nature of their [(RC≡C)(R′)I]⁺ cations is deduced from multinuclear magnetic resonance data. Within the series of new iodonium salts [CF₃C≡C(C₄F₉)I][BF₄] is an intrinsic unstable one and decomposed forming CF₃C≡CI and C₄F₁₀.     

Reactions of [Re(NO)2(PR3)2][BArF 4] complexes with phenylacetylene

The reaction of [Re(NO)₂(PR₃)₂][BAr^F ₄] (R = cyclo-C₆H₁₃ (1a), Prⁱ (1b); [BAr^F ₄]^– = [B(3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃)₄]) with phenylacetylene in the presence of a non-nucleophilic base, like 2,6-bis(tert-butyl)pyridine (BTBP) or Bu^tOK, affords the phenylethynyl complexes [Re(CCPh)(NO)₂(PR₃)₂] (R = cyclo-C₆H₁₃ (2a); Prⁱ (2b)) in moderate yields. In the absence of a base, complexes 1a and 1b are transformed into the compounds [Re(CCPh)(CH=C(Ph)ONH)(NO)(PR₃)₂][BAr^F ₄] (3a and 3b, respectively). The structure of complex 3a was confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. The latter reaction is proposed to be initiated by deprotonation of the terminal alkyne H atom by the bent nitrosyl ligand followed by the subsequent 1,3-dipolar addition of the ReN(H)O moiety to phenylacetylene.     

Latent cationic palladium(II) phosphine carboxylate complexes for norbornene polymerization

The catalytic efficacy of trans‐[(R₃P)₂Pd(O₂CR′)(LB)][B(C₆F₅)₄] ( 1 ) (LB = Lewis base) and [(R₃P)₂Pd(κ²‐O,O‐O₂CR′)][B(C₆F₅)₄] ( 2 ) for mass polymerization of 5‐n‐butyl‐2‐norbornene (Butyl‐NB) was investigated. The nature of PR₃ and LB in 1 and 2 are the most critical components influencing catalytic activity/latency for the mass polymerization of Butyl‐NB. Further, it was shown that 1 is in general more latent than 2 in mass polymerization of Butyl‐NB. 5‐n‐Decyl‐2‐norbornene (Decyl‐NB) was subjected to solution polymerization in toluene at 63(±3) °C in the presence of several of the aforementioned palladium complexes as catalysts and the polymers obtained were characterized by gel permeation chromatography. Cationic trans‐[(R₃P)₂PdMe(MeCN)][B(C₆F₅)₄] [R = Cy ( 3a ), and ⁱPr ( 3b )] and trans‐[(R₃P)₂PdH (MeCN)][B(C₆F₅)₄] [R = Cy ( 4a ), and ⁱPr ( 4b )], possible products from thermolysis of trans‐[(R₃P)₂Pd(O₂CMe)(MeCN)][B(C₆F₅)₄] [R = Cy ( 1a ) and ⁱPr ( 1g )], as well as trans‐[(R₃P)₂Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)][B(C₆F₅)₄] [R = Cy ( 5a ), and ⁱPr ( 5b )], were also examined as catalysts for solution polymerization of Decyl‐NB. A maximum activity of 5360 kg/(molPd h) of 2a was achieved at a Decyl‐NB/Pd: 26,700 ratio which is slightly better than that achieved with 5a [activity: 5030 kg/(molPd h)] but far less compared with 4a [activity: 6110 kg/(molPd h)]. Polydispersity values indicate a single highly homogeneous character of the active catalyst species. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 103–110, 2009     

Neue Koordinations-Motive bei Cyclothiazeno-Komplexen von Molybdän und Wolfram. Die Kristallstrukturen von [{Mo(N3S2)(Cl)(OtBu)2}{Mo(O)(N3S2)(OtBu)}]2 und [W(N3S2)2(LiCl){N≡W(NPPh3)3}2]

New Coordination Motives at Cyclothiazeno Complexes of Molybdenum and Tungsten. Crystal Structures of [{Mo(N₃S₂)(Cl)(O^tBu)₂}{Mo(O)(N₃S₂)(O^tBu)}]₂ and [W(N₃S₂)₂(LiCl){N≡W(NPPh₃)₃}₂] The metalla cyclothiazeno complexes (Cyclo-1λ⁶-metalla-3,5-dithia-2,4,6-triazino complexes) [{Mo(N₃S₂)(Cl) · (O^tBu)₂}{Mo(O)(N₃S₂)(O^tBu)}]₂ ( 1 ) and [W(N₃S₂)₂(LiCl) · {N≡W(NPPh₃)₃}₂] ( 2 ) are formed from [MoCl₃(N₃S₂)]₂ and LiO^tBu in toluene, and from [WCl₃(N₃S₂)]₂ and LiNPPh₃ in THF, respectively. The complexes form moisture sensitive, black ( 1 ) or brown ( 2 ) crystals, which we characterized by crystal structure analyses. 1 · Toluene: Space group P 1, Z = 1, lattice dimensions at –83 °C: a = 934.2(1), b = 964.4(1), c = 1700.3(1) pm; α = 83.54(1)°, β = 78.35(1)°, γ = 71.56(1)°, R₁ = 0.0339. 2 · 1.625 Toluene · 0.75 THF: Space group P 1, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at –80 °C: a = 1313.8(1), b = 2896.8(2), c = 3384.9(3) pm; α = 82.42(1)°, β = 88.71(1)°, γ = 77.28(1)°, R₁ = 0.0603.     

Lanthanide(II) Complexes of the Dihydrotriazinido Ligand [N{C(Ph)=N}2C(tBu)Ph]−

The potassium dihydrotriazinide K(L^Ph,tBu) ( 1 ) was obtained by a metal exchange route from [Li(L^Ph,tBu)(THF)₃] and KOtBu (L^Ph,tBu = [N{C(Ph)=N}₂C(tBu)Ph]). Reaction of 1 with 1 or 0.5 equivalents of SmI₂(thf)₂ yielded the monosubstituted Sm^II complex [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)I(THF)₄] ( 2 ) or the disubstituted [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 3 ), respectively. Attempted synthesis of a heteroleptic Sm^II amido‐alkyl complex by the reaction of 2 with KCH₂Ph produced compound 3 due to ligand redistribution. The Yb^II bis(dihydrotriazinide) [Yb(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 4 ) was isolated from the 1:1 reaction of YbI₂(THF)₂ and 1 . Molecular structures of the crystalline compounds 2 , 3· 2C₆H₆ and 4· PhMe were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Further Studies of CoIII(TIM) Mono-Alkynyl and Bis-Alkynyl Complexes

A new series of mono- and bis-alkynyl Co^III(TIM) complexes (TIM=2,3,9,10-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradeca-1,3,8,10-tetraene) is reported herein. The trans-[Co(TIM)(C₂R)Cl]⁺ complexes were prepared from the reaction between trans-[Co(TIM)Cl₂]PF₆ and HC₂R (R=tri(isopropyl)silyl or TIPS ( 1 ), -C₆H₄-4-^tBu ( 2 ), -C₆H₄-4-NO₂ ( 3 a ), and N-mesityl-1,8-naphthalimide or NAP^Mes ( 4 a )) in the presence of Et₃N. The intermediate complexes of the type trans-[Co(TIM)(C₂R)(NCMe)](PF₆)(OTf), 3 b and 4 b , were obtained by treating 3 a and 4 a , respectively, with AgOTf in CH₃CN. Furthermore, bis-alkynyl trans-[Co(TIM)(C₂R)₂]PF₆ complexes, 3 c and 4 c , were generated following a second dehydrohalogenation reaction between 3 b and 4 b , respectively, and the appropriate HC₂R in the presence of Et₃N. These new complexes have been characterized using X-ray diffraction ( 2 , 3 a , 4 a , and 4 c ), IR, ¹H NMR, UV/Vis spectroscopy, fluorescent spectroscopy ( 4 c ), and cyclic voltammetry.     

Functionalised Tris(pyrazolyl)methane Ligands and Re(CO)3 Complexes Thereof

The synthesis of new tripodal nitrogen ligands derived from tris(pyrazolyl)methane (Tpm^R, R = H, tBu, Ph in 3‐position) is described. After deprotonation of the parent tris(pyrazolyl)methane Tpm^R, the carbanion reacts readily with ethylene oxide to yield the 3,3,3‐tris(3′‐substituted pyrazolyl)propanol ligands[(3‐Rpz)₃CCH₂CH₂OH, R = H, tBu, Ph, 1a – c ]. These ligands can be easily derivatised at the alcohol function. Microwave‐assisted reactions of these ligands and [Re(CO)₅Br] yields the complex [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]Br ( 4 ) in the case of ligand 1a , whereas in the case of the substituted ligands 1b and 1c degradation was observed. The degradation products are identified as [(Hpz^R)₂Re(CO)₃Br] [R = tBu ( 7b ), Ph ( 7c )]. These complexes were also prepared directly from [Re(CO)₅Br] and the corresponding pyrazoles by microwave‐assisted synthesis. The Re(CO)₃ complexes 4 and [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]OTf ( 5 ) are water‐soluble. The structures of 5· H₂O and [{(pz)₃CCH₂CH₃}Re(CO)₃]OTf · 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN ( 6· 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN) as well as the structure of 7b have been elucidated by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesen und Eigenschaften von Tetrakis(perfluoralkyl)tellur Te(Rf)4 (Rf = CF3, C2F5, C2F5, C3F7, C4F9)

Synthesis and Properties of Tetrakis(Perfluoroalkyl)Tellurium Te(R_f)₄ (R_f = CF₃, C₂F₅, C₃F₇, C₄F₉) Te(CF₃)₄ is obtained from the reaction of Te(CF₃)Cl₂ with Cd(CF₃)₂ complexes as a complex with e. g. CH₃CN, DMF. It is a light and temperature sensitive hydrolysable liquid. The reaction with fluorides yields the complex anion [Te(CF₃)₄F]⁻, with fluoride ion acceptors the complex cation [Te(CF₃)₃]⁺. With traces of water an acidic solution is formed. Te(CF₃)₄ acts as a trifluoromethylation reagent. The reaction with XeF₂ gives hints for the formation of Ye(CF₃)₄F₂. Properties and NMR spectra are discussed. The much more stable complexes of Te(R_f)₄ (R_f = C₂F₅, C₃F₇, C₄F₉) are formed from the reaction of TeCl₄ with the corresponding Cd(R_f)₂ complexes.