From discrete [Mn4] cluster to 1D complex: Two new mixed-valence manganese complexes with slow magnetization relaxation

A tetranuclear manganese complex [Mn₄(HL)₄(MeOH)₄(SCN)₂]·3MeOH (1) and a one-dimensional assembly of [Mn₄] units, [Mn₄(HL)₄(MeOH)₄(N(CN)₂)₂]·2.5MeOH (2) (H₃L = 2,6-bis(hydroxymethyl)-4-methylphenol), have been synthesized and studied. Complexes 1 and 2 crystallize in the triclinic space group P $ \bar 1 $ \bar 1 and monoclinic space group P21/n, respectively. Complex 1 possesses a mixed-valence tetranuclear dicubane unit, which comprises two Mn^II and two Mn^III ions. Complex 2 is built from the similar tetranuclear [Mn₄] units connected through two N(CN)₂⁻ anions into a 1-D chain. The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibilities of 1 and 2 indicates ferromagnetic interactions between the manganese ions. Frequency-dependent out-of-phase signals of alternating current magnetic susceptibilities are observed in the low temperature range for both complexes, indicating a slow magnetic relaxation.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Magnetic Properties of Two Tetrahedral MnIIMnIII3 Complexes

Two tetranuclear manganese complexes, [NaMn^IIMn₃^III(μ₄‐O^2–)(HL)₃(SCN)₄] ( 1 ) and [NaMn^IIMn₃^III(μ₄‐O^2–)(HL)₃Cl₄][NaMn^IIMn₃^III(μ₄‐O^2–)(HL)₃Cl₃(H₂O)]ClO₄ · 3.5H₂O ( 2 ) were obtained from the reaction of manganese perchlorate with a quadridentate Schiff base ligand, 3‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneamino)propane‐1, 2‐diol (H₃L) derived from condensation of 2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde with 3‐amino‐1, 2‐propanediol, as well as the coligand KSCN or NaCl under basic conditions. Single‐crystal X‐ray studies reveal that those two complexes all have a mixed‐valent tetrahedral core, which contains an apical Mn^II ion and three basal Mn^III ions situated in the [Mn₃(μ₄‐O^2–)]⁷⁺ equilateral triangle plane. Fitting of the magnetic susceptibility data to the theoretical χ_mT vs. T expression, revealed that the presence of only antiferromagnetic interactions between the central metal atoms in 1 , while both antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic interactions are present in 2 .     

A Tetranuclear Manganese Cluster with a Star‐Shaped Mn4O6 Core Motif: Directed Synthesis using a Mononuclear Precursor Complex

The tetranuclear manganese(II) complex [Mn₄(ppi)₆](BPh₄)₂ ( 2 ) (Hppi = 2‐pyridylmethyl‐2‐hydroxy phenylimine) is prepared by using the precursor complex [Mn(ppi)₂]·H₂O ( 1 ). Based on UV/Vis‐ and IR‐spectroscopy data in combination with mass spectrometry it has been concluded that 1 is a mononuclear neutral Mn^II complex, in which two ppi ligands chelate the manganese atom. Compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1¯ (no. 2), with a = 17.500(3), b = 17.955(4), c = 19.101(4) Å, α = 113.79(3)°, β = 111.33(3)°, γ = 93.91(3)°, V = 4950(2) ų and Z = 2. In the tetranuclear [Mn₄(ppi)₆]²⁺ complex cation Mn(1), Mn(2), and Mn(3) are equivalently coordinated by two deprotonated Hppi ligands leading to a N₄O₂ donor set. The environment of the central Mn(4) is formed by coordination of three [Mn(ppi)₂] fragments resulting in a phenoxo bridged star‐shaped Mn₄O₆ core motif. The average distance of directly adjacent manganese ions is 3.310 Å, whereas the average distance of Mn(1), Mn(2), and Mn(3) among each other is 5.732 Å.     

Tetranuclear Manganese Complex Incorporating 2‐Pyridyloximate Ligand: Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Magnetic Property

A tetranuclear manganese complex of the composition {Mn₄[(Py)C(Ph)NO]₄(CH₃CH₂OH)₃(CH₃CH₂O)Cl₃}·2H₂O ( 1 ) was synthesized by solvothermal reaction, and characterized by X‐ray single crystal diffraction, IR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. X‐ray analysis revealed that complex 1 contains a [Mn₄(NO)₄]⁴⁺ core with three Mn^II atoms displaying distorted octahedral arrangements and one Mn^II ion exhibiting a trigonal bipyramidal arrangement. Low‐temperature magnetic susceptibility measurement for the solid sample of 1 revealed antiferromagnetic Mn^II ··· Mn^II interactions.     

Synthesis, structure, and properties of a new representative of the family of calix[4]arene-containing [MnII 2MnIII 2]-clusters

A new representative of calix[4]arene-containing tetranuclear manganese complexes of the [Mn^II ₂Mn^III ₂] type was obtained. According to the data of magnetoochemical studies, the complex exhibits properties of molecular magnet at the temperature below 5 K. Parameters of the exchange interaction and the activation energy were determined. The influence of the peripheral environment on the magnetic properties of the tetranuclear manganese framework in the structure of the complex was revealed.     

Electrochemistry and Spectroscopy of Sulfate Complexes of (Tetraphenylporphyrinato)manganese

The electrochemical and spectroscopic properties of [Mn₂(tpp)₂(SO₄)] (H₂tpp=tetraphenylporphyrin=5,10,15,20‐tetraphenyl‐21H,23H‐porphine) were studied to characterize the stability of this compound as a function of solvent, redox state, and sulfate concentration. In non‐coordinating solvents such as 1,2‐dichloroethane, the dimer was stable, and two cyclic voltammetric waves were observed in the region for Mn^III reduction. These waves correspond to reduction of the dimer to [Mn^II(tpp)] and [Mn^III(tpp)(OSO₃)]^?, and reduction of [Mn^III(tpp)(OSO₃)]^? to [Mn^II(tpp)(OSO₃)]^2?, respectively. In the coordinating solvent DMSO, [Mn₂(tpp)₂(SO₄)] was unstable and dissociated to form [Mn^III(tpp)(DMSO)₂]⁺. A single voltammetric wave was observed for Mn^III reduction in this solvent, corresponding to formation of [Mn^II(tpp)(DMSO)]. In non‐coordinating solvent systems, addition of sulfate (as the bis(triphenylphosphoranylidene)ammonium (PPN⁺) salt) resulted in dimer dissociation, yielding [Mn^III(tpp)(OSO₃)]^?. Reduction of this monomer produced [Mn^II(tpp)(OSO₃)]^2?. In DMSO, addition of SO led to displacement of solvent molecules forming [Mn^III(tpp)(OSO₃)]^?. Reduction of this species in DMSO led to [Mn^II(tpp)(DMSO)].     

Syntheses,Structures and Magnetic Properties of Two Mixed‐Valent Disc‐like Hepta‐nuclear Compounds of [FeIIFeIII6(tea)6](ClO4)2 and [MnII3MnIII4(nmdea)6(N3)6]·CH3OH (tea = N(CH2CH2O)33−, nmdea = CH3N(CH2CH2O)22−)

Two mixed‐valent disc‐like hepta‐nuclear compounds of [Fe^IIFe^III₆(tea)₆](ClO₄)₂ ( 1Fe , tea = N(CH₂CH₂O)₃^3?) and [Mn^II₃Mn^III₄(nmdea)₆(N₃)₆]·CH₃OH ( 2Mn , nmdea = CH₃N(CH₂CH₂O)₂^2?) have been synthesized by the reaction of Fe(ClO₄)₂·6H₂O with triethanolamine (H₃tea) for the former and reaction of Mn(ClO₄)₂·6H₂O with diethanolamine (H₂nmdea) and NaN₃ for the later, respectively. 1Fe has the cationic cluster with a planar [Fe^IIFe^III₆] core consisting of one central Fe^II and six rim Fe^III atoms in hexagonal arrangement. The Fe ions are linked by the oxo‐bridges from the alcohol arms in the manner of edge‐sharing of their coordination octahedra. 2Mn is a neutral cluster with a [Mn^II₃Mn^III₄] core possessing one central Mn^II atom surrounded by six rim Mn ions, two Mn^II and four Mn^III. The structure is similar to 1Fe but involves six terminal azido ligands, each coordinate one rim Mn ion. 1Fe showed dominant antiferromagnetic interaction within the cluster and long‐range ordering at 2.7 K. The cluster probably has a ground state of low spin of S = 5/2 or 4/2. The long‐range ordering is weak ferromagnetic, showing small hysteresis with a remnant magnetization of 0.3 Nβ and a coercive field of 40 Oe. Moreover, the isofield of lines 1Fe are far from superposition, indicating the presence of significant zero–field splitting. Ferromagnetic interactions are dominant in 2Mn . An intermediate spin ground state 25/2 is observed at low field. In high field of 50 kOe, the energetically lowest state is given by the m_s = 31/2 component of the S = 31/2 multiplet due to the Zeeman effect. Despite of the large ground state, no single‐molecule magnet behavior was found above 2 K.     

What Controls the Magnetic Exchange Interaction in Mixed‐ and Homo‐Valent Mn7 Disc‐Like Clusters? A Theoretical Perspective

Density functional theory (DFT) studies have been undertaken to compute the magnetic exchange and to probe the origin of the magnetic interactions in two hetero‐ and two homo‐valent heptanuclear manganese disc‐like clusters, of formula [Mn^II₄Mn^IV₃(tea)(teaH₂)₃(peolH)₄] ( 1 ), [Mn^II₄Mn^III₃F₃(tea)(teaH)(teaH₂)₂(piv)₄(Hpiv)(chp)₃] ( 2 ), [Mn^II₇(pppd)₆(tea)(OH)₃] ( 3 ) and [Mn^II₇ (paa)₆(OMe)₆] ( 4 ) (teaH₃=triethanolamine, peolH₄=pentaerythritol, Hpiv=pivalic acid, Hchp=6‐chloro‐2‐hydroxypyridine, pppd=1‐phenyl‐3‐(2‐pyridyl) propane‐1,3‐dione; paaH=N‐(2‐pyridinyl)acetoacetamide). DFT calculations yield J values, which reproduce the magnetic susceptibility data very well for all four complexes; these studies are also highlighting the likely ageing/stability problems in two of the complexes. It is found that the spin ground states, S, for complexes 1 – 4 are drastically different, varying from S=29/2 to S=1/2. These values are found to be controlled by the nature of the oxidation state of the metal ions and minor differences present in the structures. Extensive magneto–structural correlations are developed for the seven building unit dimers present in the complexes, with the correlations unlocking the reasons behind the differences in the magnetic properties observed. Independent of the oxidation state of the metal ions, the Mn‐O‐Mn/Mn‐F‐Mn angles are found to be the key parameters, which significantly influence the sign as well as the magnitude of the J values. The magneto–structural correlations developed here, have broad applicability and can be utilised to understand the magnetic properties of other Mn clusters.     

A one‐dimensional chain structure based on unusual tetranuclear manganese(II) clusters

The title coordination polymer, poly[bis(μ₄‐biphenyl‐2,2′‐dicarboxylato)(dipyrido[3,2‐a:2′,3′‐c]phenazine)manganese(II)], [Mn₂(C₁₄H₈O₄)₂(C₁₈H₁₀N₄)]_n, was obtained through the reaction of MnCl₂·4H₂O, biphenyl‐2,2′‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂dpdc) and dipyrido[3,2‐a:2′,3′‐c]phenazine (L) under hydrothermal conditions. The asymmetric unit contains two crystallographically unique Mn^II ions, one unique L ligand and two unique dpdc ligands. One Mn ion is six‐coordinated by four O atoms from three different dpdc ligands and two N atoms from one L ligand, adopting a distorted octahedral coordination geometry. The distortions from ideal octahedral geometry are largely due to the presence of chelating ligands and the resulting acute N—Mn—N and O—Mn—O angles. The second Mn ion is coordinated in a distorted trigonal bipyramidal fashion by five O atoms from four distinct dpdc ligands. Four Mn^II ions are bridged by the carboxylate groups of the dpdc ligands to form an unusual tetranuclear Mn^II cluster. Clusters are further connected by the aromatic backbone of the dicarboxylate ligands, forming a one‐dimensional chain structure along the b axis. The title compound is the first example of a chain structure based on a tetranuclear Mn^II cluster.     

Two new clusters with MnII-MnIV magnetic exchange from the use of polyalcohol ligands

Two mixed-valence Mn(II,IV) complexes, [Mn^II₄Mn^IV₃(teaH)₃(tea)(thmeH)₃(thme)](ClO₄)₂·3MeCN (1) and [Mn^II₂Mn^IV₂(edteH)₂(peolH)₂]·4MeOH (2), where H₄edte = N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediamine, teaH₃ = tris(2-hydroxyethyl)amine, H₄peol = pentaerythritol, and H₃thme = 1,1,1-tris(hydroxymethyl)ethane, were prepared from the corresponding manganese salts and mixed ligands with polyalcohols. The two clusters consist of a trapped-valence polynuclear core comprising 4Mn^II and 3Mn^IV for 1, 2Mn^II and 2Mn^IV ions for 2. Complex 1 crystallizes in the rhombohedral space group R3c, while 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. Complex 1 consists of a near-planar Mn₇ unit that comprises a Mn₆ hexagon of alternating Mn^II and Mn^IV ions surrounding a central Mn^II ion. The remaining coordinated sites are occupied by eight different deprotonation degrees of H₃tea or H₃thme. The tetranuclear cluster of 2 consists of a fused defective dicubane Mn₄O₆ core, and the four Mn ions are coordinated by oxygens from edteH^3? and peolH^3? into an unusual butterfly-like [Mn^II₂Mn^IV₂] topology. The two clusters are also characterized by mass spectra and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Direct current magnetization studies reveal ferromagnetic interactions within both Mn clusters.     

The anion-directed self-assembly of manganese complexes derived from 2-ethoxy-6-[(2-phenylaminoethylimino)methyl]phenol

The mixed valence manganese(II/IV) complex, [Mn^IIL₂(MeOH)₂]·[Mn^IVL₂(OAc)₂]·2(MeOH) (1), and the chloride-bridged 1D polymeric manganese(III) complex, [Mn^IIIL₂(μ-Cl)]_n (2), where L is the deprotonated form of 2-ethoxy-6-[(2-phenylaminoethylimino)methyl]phenol (HL), have been prepared and structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis and IR spectra. The Mn atoms in both complexes are octahedrally coordinated. The self-assembly of the complex structures is apparently directed by the anions of the manganese salts.     

Synthesis and spectral studies on heterobimetallic complexes of manganese and ruthenium derived from N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide

The complex [Mn^IV(napbh)₂] (napbhH₂ = N-(2-hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)methylenebenzoylhydrazide) reacts with activated ruthenium(III) chloride in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux, giving heterobimetallic complexes, [Mn^IV(napbh)₂Ru^IIICl₃(H₂O)] · [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)] reacts with Mn(OAc)₂·4H₂O in methanol in 1 : 1.2 molar ratio under reflux to give [Ru^III(napbhH)Cl₂(H₂O)Mn^II(OAc)₂]. Replacement of aquo in these heterobimetallic complexes has been observed when the reactions are carried out in the presence of pyridine (py), 3-picoline (3-pic), or 4-picoline (4-pic). The molar conductances for these complexes in DMF indicates 1 : 1 electrolytes. Magnetic moment values suggest that these heterobimetallic complexes contain Mn^IV and Ru^III or Ru^III and Mn^II in the same structural unit. Electronic spectral studies suggest six coordinate metal ions. IR spectra reveal that the napbhH₂ ligand coordinates in its enol form to Mn^IV and bridges to Ru^III and in the keto form to Ru^III and bridging to Mn^II.     

Hexanuclear and Tetranuclear Mn/Ln clusters using 2‐(hydroxymethyl)pyridine: Synthesis,structures and magnetic properties

Reactions of manganese benzoate dihydrate and lanthanide nitrate hexahydrate with 2‐(hydroxymethyl)pyridine (hmpH) as ligand in the mixture solutions of acetonitrile and ethanol according to different molar ratios of NEt₃ generated two kinds of Mn‐Ln compounds [Mn^III₄La^III₂(O)₂(hmp)₇(PhCO₂)₂(NO₃)₅] ·5H₂O ( 1 ) and [Mn^III₂Gd^III₂(hmp)₆(PhCO₂)₄(NO₃)₂] ·3CH₃CN·3C₂H₅OH·2H₂O ( 2 ). By comparison of the two compounds, there exist considerable effects of reaction alkalinity on the structures and magnetic properties of products. Compound 1 possesses a core of [Mn^III₄La^III₂(μ ₄‐O)(μ ₃‐O)(μ ₃‐OR)(μ ₂‐O)₇]²⁻, which comprises three face‐sharing defected cubane units. The core topology represents a new core type of Mn‐Ln clusters. Compound 2 has a planar‐butterfly structure. The solid‐state dc magnetic susceptibility analyses indicate the antiferromagnetic interactions within compound 1 and ferromagnetic interactions within compound 2 . Compound 1 has an S  = 0 ground state, while compound 2 possesses an S  = 11 ground state, fitting of the dc data for the tetranuclear Mn₂Gd₂ with the Magpack program gives parameters of J _Mn‐Mn  = 3.11 cm⁻¹, J _Mn‐Gd  = 0.02 cm^—1 and g  = 1.96.     

One‐Dimensional Ferromagnetically Coupled Bimetallic Chains Constructed with trans‐[Ru(acac)2(CN)2]−: Syntheses,Structures, Magnetic Properties,and Density Functional Theoretical Study

Four cyano‐bridged 1D bimetallic polymers have been prepared by using the paramagnetic building block trans‐[Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]^? (Hacac=acetylacetone): {[{Ni(tren)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][ClO₄]?CH₃OH}_n ( 1 ) (tren=tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine), {[{Ni(cyclen)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][ClO₄]? CH₃OH}_n ( 2 ) (cyclen=1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane), {[{Fe(salen)}{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}]}_n ( 3 ) (salen^2?=N,N′‐bis(salicylidene)‐o‐ethyldiamine dianion) and [{Mn(5,5′‐Me₂salen)}₂{Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂}][Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]? 2 CH₃OH ( 4 ) (5,5′‐Me₂salen=N,N′‐bis(5,5′‐dimethylsalicylidene)‐o‐ethylenediimine). Compounds 1 and 2 are 1D, zigzagged NiRu chains that exhibit ferromagnetic coupling between Ni^II and Ru^III ions through cyano bridges with J=+1.92 cm^?1, z J′=?1.37 cm^?1, g=2.20 for 1 and J=+0.85 cm^?1, z J′=?0.16 cm^?1, g=2.24 for 2 . Compound 3 has a 1D linear chain structure that exhibits intrachain ferromagnetic coupling (J=+0.62 cm^?1, z J′=?0.09 cm^?1, g=2.08), but antiferromagnetic coupling occurs between FeRu chains, leading to metamagnetic behavior with T_N=2.6 K. In compound 4 , two Mn^III ions are coordinated to trans‐[Ru(acac)₂(CN)₂]^? to form trinuclear Mn₂Ru units, which are linked together by π–π stacking and weak Mn???O* interactions to form a 1D chain. Compound 4 shows slow magnetic relaxation below 3.0 K with ?=0.25, characteristic of superparamagnetic behavior. The Mn^III???Ru^III coupling constant (through cyano bridges) and the Mn^III???Mn^III coupling constant (between the trimers) are +0.87 and +0.24 cm^?1, respectively. Compound 4 is a novel single‐chain magnet built from Mn₂Ru trimers through noncovalent interactions. Density functional theory (DFT) combined with the broken symmetry state method was used to calculate the molecular magnetic orbitals and the magnetic exchange interactions between Ru^III and M (M=Ni^II, Fe^III, and Mn^III) ions. To explain the somewhat unexpected ferromagnetic coupling between low‐spin Ru^III and high‐spin Fe^III and Mn^III ions in compounds 3 and 4 , respectively, it is proposed that apart from the relative symmetries, the relative energies of the magnetic orbitals may also be important in determining the overall magnetic coupling in these bimetallic assemblies.     

Tuning a Single Ligand System to Stabilize Multiple Spin States of Manganese: A First Example of a Hydrazone‐Based Manganese(III) Spin‐Crossover Complex

A series of bis‐chelate pseudo‐octahedral mononuclear coordination complexes of manganese with the chromophore [MnN₄O₂]ⁿ⁺ (n=0, 1) have been generated in all three principal oxidation states of this transition‐metal center under ambient conditions by utilizing a readily tunable, versatile phenolic pyridylhydrazone ligand system (i.e., H₂(3,5‐R¹,R²)‐L; L=ligand). Strategic combinations of the nature and position of a variety of substituent groups afforded selective, spontaneous stabilization of multiple spin states of the manganese center, which, upon close crystallographic scrutiny, appears to be in part due to the occurrence or absence of hydrogen‐bonding interactions that involve the phenolate/phenolic oxygen atom. The divalent complexes are isolable in two forms, namely, molecular [Mn^II{H(3,5‐R¹,R²)‐L}₂] and ionic [Mn^II{H₂(3,5‐R¹,R²)‐L}{H(3,5‐R¹,R²)‐L}]ClO₄, with the latter complex converting easily into the former complex on deprotonation. Accessibility of the higher‐valent states is achievable only when the phenolate oxygen atom is sterically hindered from participation in hydrogen bonding. The [Mn^III{H(3,5‐tBu₂)‐L}₂]ClO₄ complex is the first example of a hydrazone‐based Mn^III complex to exhibit spin crossover. Formation of the tetravalent complexes [Mn^IV{(3,5‐R¹,R²)‐L}₂] (R¹=tBu, R²=H; R¹=R²=tBu) necessitates base‐assisted abstraction of the hydrazinic proton.     

A mixed‐valence diacetate‐bridged MnII–MnIII complex incorporating a bridging phenolate ligand

The synthesis and characterization of a new unsymmetrical dinucleating N,O‐donor ligand, 2‐[N,N‐bis­(2‐pyridyl­methyl)­amino­methyl]‐6‐[N‐(3,5‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐oxidobenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridyl­amino)­aminomethyl]‐4‐methyl­phenol (H₂Ldtb), as well as the X‐ray crystal structure of its corresponding mixed‐valence diacetate‐bridged manganese complex, di‐μ‐acetato‐μ‐{2‐[N,N‐bis­(2‐pyridylmethyl)amino­methyl]‐6‐[N‐(3,5‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐oxidobenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridyl­amino)­aminomethyl]‐4‐methylphenolato}dimanganese(II,III) tetra­phenyl­borate, [Mn^IIMn^III(C₄₂H₄₉N₅O₂)(C₂H₃O₂)₂](C₂₄H₂₀B), are reported. The complex may be regarded as an inter­esting structural model for the mixed‐valence Mn^II–Mn^III state of manganese catalase.     

A New 3D Supramolecular Manganese(II) Complex Constructed from Benzimidazole‐5,6‐dicarboxylate and Oxalate: Synthesis,Structural, and Magnetic Properties

A new manganese(II) complex [Mn₃(bidc)₂(C₂O₄)(H₂O)₁₀]_n ( 1 ) (bidc = benzimidazole‐5,6‐dicarboxylate) was synthesized and characterized by X‐ray crystallography. X‐ray diffraction shows that complex 1 has a neutral, one‐dimensional (1D) brick wall chain structure. With the intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions, the adjacent chains are joined into a 3D suparmolecular architecture. IR spectroscopy and variable temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements were made, which indicated weak antiferromagnetic coupling between the Mn^II ions in complex 1 .     

Studies on binuclear hydroxo/carboxylato-bridged manganese(III) complexes and a mononuclear manganese(III) complex involving salen type ligands

Synthesis of six hydroxo-bridged binuclear manganese(III) complexes of formulae [MnL-X-MnL](ClO₄) [X = OH (1–6)] along with a mononuclear manganese(III) complex (7) [Mn(L)(L′)(MeOH)₂] [HL′ = 2-(2-hydroxy-phen-yl)benzimidazole] and two carboxylate-bridged binuclear manganese(III) complexes (8) and (9) are described. The complexes have been characterized by the combination of i.r., u.v.-vis spectroscopy, magnetic moments and by their redox properties. The electronic spectra of all the complexes exhibit almost identical features consisting of two d–d bands at ca. 550 and 600 nm, one MLCT band at ca.400 nm, together with two π–π^* intra-ligand transitions at ca. 250 nm and ca.300 nm. Room temperature magnetic data range from μ = 2.7–3.0 BM indicates some super-exchange between the binuclear metal centers via bridging hydroxo/carboxylato groups. The X-ray crystal structure of the binuclear complex (5) revealed that it has a symmetric Mn^IIIN₂O₂ core bridged by a hydroxyl group. The X-ray analysis of the mononuclear complex (7) showed that the manganese-center possesses a distorted octahedral geometry. Electrochemical properties of hydroxo-bridged manganese(III) complexes (1–6) show identical features consisting of an irreversible and a quasi-reversible reduction corresponding to the Mn₂^III → Mn^IIMn^III → Mn^IIMn^II couples in the voltammogram. It was found that electron withdrawing substituents on the ligand result in easier reduction. Complex (7) displays an irreversible reduction at 0.08 V and a reversible oxidation at 0.45V assignable to the Mn^III → Mn^II reduction and Mn^III → Mn^IV oxidation, respectively. The carboxylate-bridged compound (8) exhibits two irreversible oxidations at 0.4 and 0.6 V, probably due to Mn₂^III → Mn^IIIMn^IV → Mn^IVMn^IV oxidations and shows a quasi-reversible reductive wave at −0.85 V, tentatively assigned to Mn₂^III → Mn^IIMn^III reduction.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Manganese(II) Bipyridine Carboxylato Complexes: [(bipy)2MnII(μ‐C2H5CO2)2MnII(bipy)2](ClO4)2 and [MnII(ClCH2CO2)(H2O)(bipy)2]ClO4 · H2O (bipy = 2,2′‐bipyridine)

Two manganese(II) bipyridine carboxylate complexes, [(bipy)₂Mn^II(μ‐C₂H₅CO₂)₂Mn^II(bipy)₂}₂](ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ), and [Mn^II(ClCH₂CO₂)(H₂O)(bipy)₂]ClO₄ · H₂O ( 2 ) were prepared. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 8.604(3), b = 12.062(3), c = 13.471(3) Å, α = 112.47(2), β = 93.86(2), γ = 92.87(3)°, V = 1211.1(6) ų and Z = 1. In the dimeric, cationic complex with a crystallographic center of symmetry two 2,2′‐bipyridine molecules chelate each manganese atom. These two metal fragments are then bridged by two propionato groups in a syn‐anti conformation. The Mn…Mn distance is 4.653 Å. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 9.042(1), b = 13.891(1), c = 21.022(3) Å, β = 102.00(1)°, V = 2569.3(5) ų and Z = 4. 2  is a monomeric cationic complex in which two bipyridine ligands chelate the manganese atom in a cis fashion. A chloroacetato and an aqua ligand complete the six‐coordination. Only in 2 is the intermolecular packing controlled by weak π‐stacking besides C–H…π contacts between the bipyridine ligands.     

Magnetothermal studies of a series of coordination clusters built from ferromagnetically coupled {Mn(II) (4)Mn(III) (6)} supertetrahedral units

Three high‐nuclearity mixed valence manganese^II/III coordination clusters, have been synthesised, that is, [Mn ^III ₆Mn ^II ₄(μ₃‐O)₄(HL¹)₆(μ₃‐N₃)₃(μ₃‐Br)(Br)](N₃)_0.7/(Br)_0.3 ? 3 MeCN ? 2 MeOH ( 1 ) (H₃L¹=3‐methylpentan‐1,3,5‐triol), [Mn^III₁₁Mn^II₆(μ₄‐O)₈(μ₃‐Cl)₄(μ,μ₃‐O₂CMe)₂(μ,μ‐L²)₁₀Cl_2.34(O₂CMe)_0.66(py)₃(MeCN)₂] ? 7 MeCN ( 2 ) (H₂L²=2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐propanediol and py is pyridine), and [Mn^III₁₂Mn^II₇(μ₄‐O)₈(μ₃‐η¹N₃)₈(HL³)₁₂(MeCN)₆]Cl₂ ? 10 MeOH ? MeCN ( 3 ) (H₃L³=2,6‐bis(hydroxymethyl)‐4‐methylphenol) with high ground‐spin states, S=22, 28±1, and 83/2, respectively; their magnetothermal properties have been studied. The three compounds are based on a common supertetrahedral building block as seen in the Mn₁₀ cluster. This fundamental magnetic unit is made up of a tetrahedron of Mn^II ions with six Mn^III ions placed midway along each edge giving an inscribed octahedron. Thus, the fundamental building unit as represented by compound 1 can be described as a Mn₁₀ supertetrahedron. Compounds 2 and 3 correspond to two such units joined by a common edge or vertex, respectively, resulting in Mn₁₇ and Mn₁₉ coordination clusters. Magnetothermal studies reveal that all three compounds show interesting long‐range magnetic ordering at low temperature, originating from negligible magnetic anisotropy of the compounds; compound 2 shows the largest magnetocaloric effect among the three compounds. This is as expected and can be attributed to the presence of a small magnetic anisotropy, and low‐lying excited states in compound 2 .