On the acyclic choosability of graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G = (V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is L‐list colorable if for a given list assignment L = {L(v): v ∈ V}, there exists a proper coloring c of G such that c (v) ∈ L(v) for all v ∈ V. If G is L‐list colorable for every list assignment with |L (v)| ≥ k for all v ∈ V, then G is said k‐choosable. A graph is said to be acyclically k‐choosable if the obtained coloring is acyclic. In this paper, we study the links between acyclic k‐choosability of G and Mad(G) defined as the maximum average degree of the subgraphs of G and give some observations about the relationship between acyclic coloring, choosability, and acyclic choosability. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 51: 281–300, 2006     

Acyclic 5‐choosability of planar graphs without small cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G = (V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L‐list colorable if for a given list assignment L = {L(v): v: ∈ V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring ? of G such that ?(v) ∈ L(v) for all v ∈ V. If G is acyclically L‐list colorable for any list assignment with |L (v)|≥ k for all v ∈ V, then G is acyclically k‐choosable. In this article, we prove that every planar graph G without 4‐ and 5‐cycles, or without 4‐ and 6‐cycles is acyclically 5‐choosable. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 54: 245–260, 2007     

On the adjacent vertex-distinguishing equitable edge coloring of graphs

Let G(V, E) be a graph. A k-adjacent vertex-distinguishing equatable edge coloring of G, k-AVEEC for short, is a proper edge coloring f if (1) C(u)≠C(v) for uv ∈ E(G), where C(u) = {f(uv)|uv ∈ E}, and (2) for any i, j = 1, 2,… k, we have ||Ei| |Ej|| ≤ 1, where Ei = {e|e ∈ E(G) and f(e) = i}. χáve (G) = min{k| there exists a k-AVEEC of G} is called the adjacent vertex-distinguishing equitable edge chromatic number of G. In this paper, we obtain the χáve (G) of some special graphs and present a conjecture.     

Every toroidal graph is acyclically 8-choosable

A proper coloring of a graphG is acyclic if G contains no 2-colored cycle.A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V(G)},there exists a proper acyclic coloringφof G such thatφ(v)∈L(v)for all v∈V(G).If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment L with|L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G),then G is acyclically k-choosable.In this article,we prove that every toroidal graph is acyclically 8-choosable.     

Acyclic 6-choosability of planar graphs without adjacent short cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycles.Given a list assignment L={L(v)|v∈V}of G,we say that G is acyclically L-colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloringπof G such thatπ(v)∈L(v)for all v∈V.If G is acyclically L-colorable for any list assignment L with|L(v)|k for all v∈V(G),then G is acyclically k-choosable.In this paper,we prove that every planar graph G is acyclically 6-choosable if G does not contain 4-cycles adjacent to i-cycles for each i∈{3,4,5,6}.This improves the result by Wang and Chen(2009).     

Planar graphs without 4‐cycles are acyclically 6‐choosable

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V, E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L‐list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v)|v∈V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L‐list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k‐choosable. In this paper we prove that every planar graph G without 4‐cycles is acyclically 6‐choosable. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 61: 307–323, 2009     

Acyclic 4-choosability of planar graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. Given a list assignment L={L(v)∣v∈V} of G, we say G is acyclically L-list colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper we prove that planar graphs without 4, 7, and 8-cycles are acyclically 4-choosable.     

List circular coloring of trees and cycles

Suppose G=(V, E) is a graph and p ≥ 2q are positive integers. A (p, q)‐coloring of G is a mapping ?: V → {0, 1, …, p‐1} such that for any edge xy of G, q ≤ |?(x)‐?(y)| ≤ p‐q. A color‐list is a mapping L: V → ({0, 1, …, p‐1}) which assigns to each vertex v a set L(v) of permissible colors. An L‐(p, q)‐coloring of G is a (p, q)‐coloring ? of G such that for each vertex v, ?(v) ∈ L(v). We say G is L‐(p, q)‐colorable if there exists an L‐(p, q)‐coloring of G. A color‐size‐list is a mapping ? which assigns to each vertex v a non‐negative integer ?(v). We say G is ?‐(p, q)‐colorable if for every color‐list L with |L(v)| = ?(v), G is L‐(p, q)‐colorable. In this article, we consider list circular coloring of trees and cycles. For any tree T and for any p ≥ 2q, we present a necessary and sufficient condition for T to be ?‐(p, q)‐colorable. For each cycle C and for each positive integer k, we present a condition on ? which is sufficient for C to be ?‐(2k+1, k)‐colorable, and the condition is sharp. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 55: 249–265, 2007     

A sufficient condition for planar graphs to be acyclically 5‐choosable

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G = (V, E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. Given a list assignment L = {L(v)|v∈V} of G, we say G is acyclically L‐list colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L‐list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k‐choosable. In this article we prove that every planar graph without 4‐cycles and without intersecting triangles is acyclically 5‐choosable. This improves the result in [M. Chen and W. Wang, Discrete Math 308 (2008), 6216–6225], which says that every planar graph without 4‐cycles and without two triangles at distance less than 3 is acyclically 5‐choosable. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

List total colorings of series-parallel graphs

A total coloring of a graph G is a coloring of all elements of G, i.e., vertices and edges, in such a way that no two adjacent or incident elements receive the same color. Let L(x) be a set of colors assigned to each element x of G. Then a list total coloring of G is a total coloring such that each element x receives a color contained in L(x). The list total coloring problem asks whether G has a list total coloring. In this paper, we first show that the list total coloring problem is NP-complete even for series-parallel graphs. We then give a sufficient condition for a series-parallel graph to have a list total coloring, that is, we prove a theorem that any series-parallel graph G has a list total coloring if |L(v)|min{5,Δ+1} for each vertex v and |L(e)|max{5,d(v)+1,d(w)+1} for each edge e=vw, where Δ is the maximum degree of G and d(v) and d(w) are the degrees of the ends v and w of e, respectively. The theorem implies that any series-parallel graph G has a total coloring with Δ+1 colors if Δ4. We finally present a linear-time algorithm to find a list total coloring of a given series-parallel graph G if G satisfies the sufficient condition.     

List Colorings of K5‐Minor‐Free Graphs With Special List Assignments

The following question was raised by Bruce Richter. Let G be a planar, 3‐connected graph that is not a complete graph. Denoting by d(v) the degree of vertex v, is G L‐list colorable for every list assignment L with |L(v)| = min{d(v), 6} for all v∈V(G)? More generally, we ask for which pairs (r, k) the following question has an affirmative answer. Let r and k be the integers and let G be a K₅‐minor‐free r‐connected graph that is not a Gallai tree (i.e. at least one block of G is neither a complete graph nor an odd cycle). Is G L‐list colorable for every list assignment L with |L(v)| = min{d(v), k} for all v∈V(G)? We investigate this question by considering the components of G[S_k], where S_k: = {v∈V(G)|d(v)8k} is the set of vertices with small degree in G. We are especially interested in the minimum distance d(S_k) in G between the components of G[S_k]. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 71:18–30, 2012     

Linear choosability of graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a non-oriented graph G is linear if the graph induced by the vertices of any two color classes is a forest of paths. A graph G is linearly L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V(G)}, there exists a linear coloring c of G such that c(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). If G is linearly L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|?k for all v∈V(G), then G is said to be linearly k-choosable. In this paper, we investigate the linear choosability for some families of graphs: graphs with small maximum degree, with given maximum average degree, outerplanar and planar graphs. Moreover, we prove that deciding whether a bipartite subcubic planar graph is linearly 3-colorable is an NP-complete problem.     

The adaptable choosability number grows with the choosability number

The adaptable choosability number of a multigraph G, denoted ch_a(G), is the smallest integer k such that every edge labeling of G and assignment of lists of size k to the vertices of G permits a list coloring of G in which no edge e=uv has both u and v colored with the label of e. We show that ch_a grows with ch, i.e. there is a function f tending to infinity such that ch_a(G)≥f(ch(G)).     

Precoloring extension for K4‐minor‐free graphs

Let G=(V, E) be a graph where every vertex v∈V is assigned a list of available colors L(v). We say that G is list colorable for a given list assignment if we can color every vertex using its list such that adjacent vertices get different colors. If L(v)={1, …, k} for all v∈V then a corresponding list coloring is nothing other than an ordinary k‐coloring of G. Assume that W?V is a subset of V such that G[W] is bipartite and each component of G[W] is precolored with two colors taken from a set of four. The minimum distance between the components of G[W] is denoted by d(W). We will show that if G is K₄‐minor‐free and d(W)≥7, then such a precoloring of W can be extended to a 4‐coloring of all of V. This result clarifies a question posed in 10. Moreover, we will show that such a precoloring is extendable to a list coloring of G for outerplanar graphs, provided that |L(v)|=4 for all v∈V\W and d(W)≥7. In both cases the bound for d(W) is best possible. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 284‐294, 2009     

Acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs without 4-cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper we prove that every planar graph without 4-cycles and without two 3-cycles at distance less than 3 is acyclically 5-choosable. This improves a result in [M. Montassier, P. Ochem, A. Raspaud, On the acyclic choosability of graphs, J. Graph Theory 51 (2006) 281-300], which says that planar graphs of girth at least 5 are acyclically 5-choosable.     

A note on the acyclic 3-choosability of some planar graphs

An acyclic coloring of a graph G is a coloring of its vertices such that: (i) no two adjacent vertices in G receive the same color and (ii) no bicolored cycles exist in G. A list assignment of G is a function L that assigns to each vertex v∈V(G) a list L(v) of available colors. Let G be a graph and L be a list assignment of G. The graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if there exists an acyclic coloring ? of G such that ?(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment L with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G), then G is said to be acyclically k-choosable. Borodin et al. proved that every planar graph with girth at least 7 is acyclically 3-choosable (Borodin et al., submitted for publication [4]). More recently, Borodin and Ivanova showed that every planar graph without cycles of length 4 to 11 is acyclically 3-choosable (Borodin and Ivanova, submitted for publication [7]). In this note, we connect these two results by a sequence of intermediate sufficient conditions that involve the minimum distance between 3-cycles: we prove that every planar graph with neither cycles of lengths 4 to 7 (resp. to 8, to 9, to 10) nor triangles at distance less than 7 (resp. 5, 3, 2) is acyclically 3-choosable.     

Hall number for list colorings of graphs: Extremal results

Given a graph G=(V,E) and sets L(v) of allowed colors for each v∈V, a list coloring of G is an assignment of colors φ(v) to the vertices, such that φ(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V and φ(u)≠φ(v) for all uv∈E. The choice number of G is the smallest natural number k admitting a list coloring for G whenever |L(v)|≥k holds for every vertex v. This concept has an interesting variant, called Hall number, where an obvious necessary condition for colorability is put as a restriction on the lists L(v). (On complete graphs, this condition is equivalent to the well-known one in Hall’s Marriage Theorem.) We prove that vertex deletion or edge insertion in a graph of order n>3 may make the Hall number decrease by as much as n−3. This estimate is tight for all n. Tightness is deduced from the upper bound that every graph of order n has Hall number at most n−2. We also characterize the cases of equality; for n≥6 these are precisely the graphs whose complements are K₂∪(n−2)K₁, P₄∪(n−4)K₁, and C₅∪(n−5)K₁. Our results completely solve a problem raised by Hilton, Johnson and Wantland [A.J.W. Hilton, P.D. Johnson, Jr., E. B. Wantland, The Hall number of a simple graph, Congr. Numer. 121 (1996), 161-182, Problem 7] in terms of the number of vertices, and strongly improve some estimates due to Hilton and Johnson [A.J.W. Hilton, P.D. Johnson, Jr., The Hall number, the Hall index, and the total Hall number of a graph, Discrete Appl. Math. 94 (1999), 227-245] as a function of maximum degree.     

A Note on L（2, 1）-labelling of Trees

An L(2,1)-labelling of a graph G is a function from the vertex set V (G) to the set of all nonnegative integers such that |f(u) f(v)| ≥ 2 if d G (u,v)=1 and |f(u) f(v)| ≥ 1 if d G (u,v)=2.The L(2,1)-labelling problem is to find the smallest number,denoted by λ(G),such that there exists an L(2,1)-labelling function with no label greater than it.In this paper,we study this problem for trees.Our results improve the result of Wang [The L(2,1)-labelling of trees,Discrete Appl.Math.154 (2006) 598-603].     

Long paths through four vertices in a 2‐connected graph

Let G be a 2‐connected graph, let u and v be distinct vertices in V(G), and let X be a set of at most four vertices lying on a common (u, v)‐path in G. If deg(x) ≥ d for all x ∈ V(G) \ {u, v}, then there is a (u, v)‐path P in G with X ⊂ V(P) and |E(P)| ≥ d. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 33: 55–65, 2000     

Coloring graphs from lists with bounded size of their union

A graph G is k‐choosable if its vertices can be colored from any lists L(ν) of colors with |L(ν)| ≥ k for all ν ∈ V(G). A graph G is said to be (k,?)‐choosable if its vertices can be colored from any lists L(ν) with |L(ν)| ≥k, for all ν∈ V(G), and with . For each 3 ≤ k ≤ ?, we construct a graph G that is (k,?)‐choosable but not (k,? + 1)‐choosable. On the other hand, it is proven that each (k,2k ? 1)‐choosable graph G is O(k · ln k · 2^4k)‐choosable. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory