5‐Phenyluridine trihydrate

In the title compound, C₁₅H₁₆N₂O₆·~3H₂O, the substituted uracil ring is oriented in the anti position relative to the ribose ring, and the phenyl and uracil rings are oriented in a noncoplanar fashion. The furanose ring adopts a conformation close to 3′‐endo, in contrast to the furanose conformation seen in the crystal structure of the synthetic precursor 5‐bromouridine, which is close to 2′‐endo. The molecule is involved in an extensive hydrogen‐bonding network with several water molecules, some of which are disordered.     

1,7‐Dideaza‐2′‐deoxy‐6‐nitronebularine: a pyrrolo[2,3‐b]pyridine nucleoside with an intramolecular hydrogen bond stabilizing the syn conformation

The title compound [systematic name: 1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐D‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐4‐nitro‐1H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐b]pyridine], C₁₂H₁₃N₃O₅, forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the pyridine N atom as acceptor and the 5′‐hydroxy group of the sugar residue as donor. Consequently, the N‐glycosylic bond exhibits a syn conformation, with a χ torsion angle of 61.6 (2)°, and the pentofuranosyl residue adopts a C2′‐endo envelope conformation (²E, S‐type), with P = 162.1 (1)° and τ_m = 36.2 (1)°. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche, gauche), with a torsion angle γ = 49.1 (2)°. The title nucleoside forms an ordered and stacked three‐dimensional network. The pyrrole ring of one layer faces the pyridine ring of an adjacent layer. Additionally, intermolecular O—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds stabilize the crystal structure.     

Characterization by FTIR spectroscopy of the oligoribonucleotide duplexes r(A-U)6 and r(A-U)8

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy has been used to characterize the helical conformation of double stranded oligoribonucleotides r(A-U)₆ and r(A-U)₈ in solution. As expected the oligoribonucleotides are found to adopt in solution an A family type conformation. The simultaneous study of a series of duplexes containing A, T or U bases combined either with riboses or deoxyriboses allows us to propose a set of infrared marker bands allowing to distinguish between C2′ endo/anti and C3′ endo/anti conformers of dA, dT, rA and rU nucleosides in nucleic acids.     

Structural characterization and biological evaluation of small interfering RNAs containing cyclohexenyl nucleosides

CeNA is an oligonucleotide where the (deoxy)ribose sugars have been replaced by cyclohexenyl moieties. We have determined the NMR structure of a CeNA:RNA duplex and have modeled this duplex in the crystal structure of a PIWI protein. An N puckering of the ribose nucleosides, a 2H3 conformation of the cyclohexenyl nucleosides, and an A-like helix conformation of the backbone, which deviates from the standard A-type helix by a larger twist and a smaller slide, are observed. The model of the CeNA:RNA duplex bound to the PIWI protein does not show major differences in the interaction of the guide CeNA with the protein when compared with dsRNA, suggesting that CeNA modified oligonucleotides might be useful as siRNAs. Incorporation of one or two CeNA units in the sense or antisense strands of dsRNA led to similar or enhanced activity compared to unmodified siRNAs. This was tested by targeting inhibition of expression of the MDR1 gene with accompanying changes in P-glycoprotein expression, drug transport, and drug resistance.     

2′‐Deoxy‐5‐propynyluridine: a nucleoside with two conformations in the asymmetric unit

The title compound, 1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐5‐(prop‐1‐ynyl)pyrimidin‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione, C₁₂H₁₄N₂O₅, shows two conformations in the crystalline state: conformer 1 adopts a C2′‐endo (close to ²E; S‐type) sugar pucker and an anti nucleobase orientation [χ = −134.04 (19)°], while conformer 2 shows an S sugar pucker (twisted C2′‐endo–C3′‐exo), which is accompanied by a different anti base orientation [χ = −162.79 (17)°]. Both molecules show a +sc (gauche, gauche) conformation at the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond and a coplanar orientation of the propynyl group with respect to the pyrimidine ring. The extended structure is a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network involving intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds. Only O atoms function as H‐atom acceptor sites.     

Three different fluoro‐ or chloro‐substituted 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐phenyl‐β‐D‐ribofuranoses

Crystal structures are reported for three fluoro‐ or chloro‐substituted 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐phenyl‐β‐D‐ribofuranoses, namely 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐(2,4,5‐trifluorophenyl)‐β‐D‐ribofuranose, C₁₁H₁₁F₃O₄, (I), 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐(2,4,6‐trifluorophenyl)‐β‐D‐ribofuranose, C₁₁H₁₁F₃O₄, (II), and 1′‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1′‐deoxy‐β‐D‐ribofuranose, C₁₁H₁₃ClO₄, (III). The five‐membered furanose ring of the three compounds has a conformation between a C2′‐endo,C3′‐exo twist and a C2′‐endo envelope. The ribofuranose groups of (I) and (III) are connected by intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds to six symmetry‐related molecules to form double layers, while the ribofuranose group of (II) is connected by O—H...O hydrogen bonds to four symmetry‐related molecules to form single layers. The O...O contact distance of the O—H...O hydrogen bonds ranges from 2.7172 (15) to 2.8895 (19) Å. Neighbouring double layers of (I) are connected by a very weak intermolecular C—F...π contact. The layers of (II) are connected by one C—H...O and two C—H...F contacts, while the double layers of (III) are connected by a C—H...Cl contact. The conformations of the molecules are compared with those of seven related molecules. The orientation of the benzene ring is coplanar with the H—C1′ bond or bisecting the H—C1′—C2′ angle, or intermediate between these positions. The orientation of the benzene ring is independent of the substitution pattern of the ring and depends mainly on crystal‐packing effects.     

Crystal Structure and Characterization of a Double‐helical‐chain Coordination Polymer Zinc Complex Constructed by Flexible Dicarboxylate Ligand 2‐Nitro‐benzene‐1,4‐di(oxyacetate) and Rigid 2,2′‐Bipyridine Ligand

A novel double‐helical‐chain coordination polymer [Zn(nbdoa)(2,2′‐bipy)(H₂O)]_n constructed by flexible 2‐nitro‐benzene‐1,4‐di(oxyacetate) ligand and rigid 2,2′‐bipyridine ligand was obtained by hydrothermal reaction. The crystal structure demonstrates that there is a double‐helical chain with an inner channel running parallel to the helix axis without any interpenetration, which is connected to network via π‐π stacking and hydrogen bond interactions. The thermal analysis shows that the infinite helical structure is stable up to 536 K. The luminescence property is investigated and the complex shows photoluminescence in the solid state at room temperature.     

8‐Aza‐7‐deaza‐2′‐de­oxy‐2‐(methyl­sulfan­yl)adenosine

In the title compound, 4‐amino‐1‐(2‐de­oxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranos­yl)‐6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₁H₁₆N₅O₃S, the conformation of the glycosidic bond is between anti and high anti. The 2′‐deoxy­ribofuranosyl moiety adopts the C3′‐exo–C4′‐endo conformation (₃T⁴, S‐type sugar pucker), and the conformation at the exocyclic C—C bond is +sc (+gauche). The exocyclic 6‐amine group and the 2‐methyl­sulfanyl group lie on different sides of the heterocyclic ring system. The mol­ecules form a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network that is stabilized by O—H⋯N, N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.     

5‐Ethyl‐2′‐deoxy‐4′‐thiouridine (R)‐S‐oxide monohydrate

The pyrimidine ring of the title compound, C₁₁H₁₆N₂O₅S·H₂O, is planar to within 0.026 (1) Å and makes an angle of 77.73 (8)° with the mean plane of the thiosugar ring. In terms of standard nucleoside nomenclature, this ring has a C1′‐exo,C2′‐endo conformation. The O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′ torsion angle is ?167.4 (2)° and the glycosidic S4′—C1′—N1—C2 torsion angle is ?101.8 (2)° (anti).     

两个新颖的联环十二烷衍生物的合成及结构表征

2-（2＇-Oxo-3＇-oximidocyclododecyl） cyclododecanone （1） and 2-（1＇-hydroxylcyclododecyl） cyclododecanone （2） were synthesized and characterized. The conformation analysis was carried out based on the NMR, molecular mechanics calculation and X-ray diffraction. The conformation of two cyclododecyl moieties of both 1 and 2 was found to be the [3333]-2-one or [3333] square conformation both in the crystal state and the solution. The dihedral angle between carbonyl and the oxime double bond of the ring B is 180°in the crystal of 1. The protons or hydroxyl group of carbon atoms to link the two cyclododecyl moieties of 1 and 2 constitute dihedral angles of 174°in the crystal, and 175°in the solution, and the C-C 6 bond between two cyclododecyl moieties can not freely rotate in the solid state and the solution. In addition, compound 2 was the first example of a-comer-anti-monosubstituted cyclododecanone. synthesis     

Synthesis and Conformational Analysis of 2′-Deoxy-2′-(3-methoxybenzamido)adenosine,a rational-designed inhibitor of trypanosomal glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)

A series of 2′-benzamido-2′-deoxyadenosine analogues were synthesized in an effort to find new lead structures for the treatment of sleeping sickness. The 2′-deoxy-2′-(3-methoxybenzamido)adenosine ( 1h ) was proved to be a selective inhibitor of the parasite glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase which confirms the modeling studies. The solution-state conformation of 2′-(thiophene-2-carboxamido) analogue 1d demonstrates a 2′-endo conformation, an orientation of the thiophene ring under the ribose moiety, and the base part occupying a ‘syn’/‘anti’ equilibrium.     

Imino Diels–Alder adducts. II. Two pyrano[3,2‐c]quinolines

8‐Chloro‐9‐fluoro‐5‐phen­yl‐3,4,4a,5,6,10b‐hexa­hydro‐2H‐pyrano[3,2‐c]quinoline and 10‐chloro‐9‐fluoro‐5‐phen­yl‐3,4,4a,5,6,10b‐hexa­hydro‐2H‐pyrano­[3,2‐c]quinoline, both C₁₈H₁₇ClFNO, are diastereo­isomers, formed as the result of the imino Diels–Alder reactions of N‐benzyl­ideneanilines with 3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐pyran. The crystal structures reveal the stereochemistry of the pyran ring, which is endo/exo to the quinoline ring system formed in the cyclo­addition step. In both structures, the pyran ring adopts a chair conformation, while the nitrogen‐containing heterocyclic ring prefers a half‐chair conformation. The structures differ essentially in the relative orientation of the ring junction H atoms.     

2′‐Ethynyl‐DNA: Synthesis and Pairing Properties

2‐Ethynyl‐DNA was developed as a potential DNA‐selective oligonucleotide analog. The synthesis of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified nucleosides was achieved starting from properly protected 2′‐ketonucleosides by addition of lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide followed by reduction of the tertiary alcohol. After a series of protecting‐group manipulations, phosphoramidite building blocks suitable for solid‐phase synthesis were obtained. The synthesis of oligonucleotides from these building blocks was successful when a fast deprotection scheme was used. The pairing properties of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl‐modified oligonucleotides can be summarized as follows: 1) The 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl modification of pyrimidine nucleosides leads to a strong destabilization in duplexes with DNA as well as with RNA. The likely reason is that the ethynyl group sterically influences the torsional preferences around the glycosidic bond leading to a conformation not suitable for duplex formation. 2) If the modification is introduced in purine nucleosides, no such influence is observed. The pairing properties are not or only slightly changed, and, in some cases (deoxyadenosine homo‐polymers), the desired stabilization of the pairing with a DNA complementary strand and destabilization with an RNA complement is observed. 3) In oligonucleotides of alternating deoxycytidine‐deoxyguanosine sequence, the incorporation of 2′‐arabino‐ethynyl deoxyguanosine surprisingly leads to the formation of a left‐handed double helix, irrespective of salt concentration. The rationalization for this behavior is that the ethynyl group locks such duplexes in a left‐handed conformation through steric blockade.     

A microscopic view of a helical poly(γ‐peptide): Molecular dynamics simulations of a 20‐residue un‐ionized poly(γ‐D‐glutamic acid) in water

We present a molecular dynamics study of the helical conformation of the naturally occurring poly(γ‐D ‐glutamic acid) in the un‐ionized state. The study was conducted in both aqueous solution and gas‐phase considering a 20 residue polypeptide. The results indicated that the left‐handed helix with 19‐membered ring hydrogen bonds set between the CO of the amide group i and the NH of amide group i + 3 is very stable in aqueous solution. This conformation was recently proposed for this poly(γ‐amino acid) from a conformational search study. A detailed picture of the most relevant structural details of the helical conformation of poly(γ‐D ‐glutamic acid) is provided.     

5‐Methyl‐2′‐deoxy‐4′‐thio‐α‐uridine (R)‐­S‐oxide

The pyrimidine ring of the title compound, C₁₀H₁₄N₂O₅S, is planar to within 0.024 (1) Å and makes an angle of 75.46 (10)° with the mean plane of the thio­sugar ring. In terms of standard nucleoside nomenclature, this ring has the C3′‐endo conformation. The O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′ torsion angle is 166.5 (3)° and the glycosidic torsion angle S4′—C1′—N1—C2 is ?52.1 (2)° (syn).     

2,2′‐Anhydro‐1‐(3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyl)uracil,a cyclouridine nucleoside with a C4′‐endo furanosyl conformation

2,2′‐Anhydro‐1‐(3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyl)uracil, C₁₃H₁₄N₂O₇, was obtained by refluxing 2′,3′‐O‐(methoxymethylene)uridine in acetic anhydride. The structure exhibits a nearly perfect C4′‐endo (⁴E) conformation. The best four‐atom plane of the five‐membered furanose ring is O—C—C—C, involving the C atoms of the fused five‐membered oxazolidine ring, and the torsion angle is only −0.4 (2)°. The oxazolidine ring is essentially coplanar with the six‐membered uracil ring [r.m.s. deviation = 0.012 (5) Å and dihedral angle = −3.2 (3)°]. The conformation at the exocyclic C—C bond is gauche–trans which is stabilized by various C—H...π and C—O...π interactions.     

Bis(3‐endo‐camphoryl)phosphinic Acid,a Non‐Racemic Helical Supramolecular Host with Aquapores

Bis(3‐endo‐camphoryl)phosphinic acid ( 1 ) was prepared by the reaction of the lithium enolate of D‐(+)‐camphor and phosphorous trichloride followed by an oxidative work up. Compound 1 crystallizes from wet toluene as monohydrate 1 ·H₂O, which was investigated by X‐ray crystallography. Molecules of 1 are associated by strong hydrogen bonds giving rise to the formation of a supramolecular helix. The interior channel of the helix is filled by a one‐dimensional (1D) string of water molecules that are also associated by hydrogen bonding. The 1D string adopts a twisted zigzag conformation. Although the hydrogen bond networks are not cross‐linked both the screw of the helix and the twist of the 1D string of water molecules are left‐handed (M) and controlled by the chiral camphoryl residues situated on the exterior of the helix. The overall supramolecular structure is strongly reminiscent of aquaporin‐1, a significant membrane‐channel protein responsible for the transport of water into the cells.     

Influence of fluorine substitution on the molecular conformation of 3′‐deoxy‐3′‐fluoro‐5‐methyluridine

Fluorine substitutions on the furanose ring of nucleosides are known to strongly influence the conformational properties of oligonucleotides. In order to assess the effect of fluorine on the conformation of 3′‐deoxy‐3′‐fluoro‐5‐methyluridine (^RT^F), C₁₀H₁₃FN₂O₅, we studied its stereochemistry in the crystalline state using X‐ray crystallography. The compound crystallizes in the chiral orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁ and contains two symmetry‐independent molecules (A and B) in the asymmetric unit. The furanose ring in molecules A and B adopts conformations between envelope (²E, 2′‐endo, P = 162°) and twisted (²T₃, 2′‐endo and 3′exo, P = 180°), with pseudorotation phase angles (P) of 164.3 and 170.2°, respectively. The maximum puckering amplitudes, ν_max, for molecules A and B are 38.8 and 36.1°, respectively. In contrast, for 5‐methyluridine (^RT^OH), the value of P is 21.2°, which is between the ³E (3′‐endo, P = 18.0°) and ³T₄ (3′‐endo and 4′‐exo, P = 36°) conformations. The value of ν_max for ^RT^OH is 41.29°. Molecules A and B of ^RT^F generate respective helical assemblies across the crystallographic 2₁‐screw axis through classical N—H…O aand O—H…O hydrogen bonds supplemented by C—H…O contacts. Adjacent parallel helices of both molecules are linked to each other via O—H…O and O…π interactions.     

Structure and Conformation of β‐Oligopeptide Derivatives with Simple Proteinogenic Side Chains: Circular Dichroism and Molecular Dynamics Investigations

A careful CD analysis (Figs. 1 – 3 and 5; MeOH or H₂O solutions) of β‐oligopeptides ( 1 – 6 , B , C ) containing four to seven β‐amino acids reveals that seemingly small structural changes cause a switch from the CD pattern (maxima of opposite sign near 215 and 200 nm) associated with a 3₁₄‐helical structure to the CD pattern (single Cotton effect at ca. 205 nm) considered characteristic of a so‐called 12/10‐helical structure, but also exhibited by a β‐peptide adopting a hair‐pin conformation with a ten‐membered H‐bonded ring as the turn motif. Comparison of these CD spectra with those of the trans‐2‐aminocyclohexanecarboxamide oligomers, which give rise to the long‐wavelength Cotton effect only, suggests that the H‐bonded 14‐, 12‐, and 10‐membered ring conformations of the β‐peptides, and not just the entire helix structures, might actually generate the Cotton effects. This interpretation would be compatible with our previous NMR structure determinations of β‐peptides and with previously reported temperature dependences of CD and NMR spectra of β‐peptides. To further substantiate this suggestion, we have performed a statistical analysis of the β‐peptidic conformations generated by molecular‐dynamics calculations (GROMOS96) for a β‐hexapeptide ( C ; the 12/10 helix) and a β‐heptapeptide ( 6 ; the 3₁₄ helix) in MeOH (Figs. 6 – 9). Up to 400,000 conformations at 0.5‐ps intervals were analyzed from up to 200‐ns simulations (at 298 to 360 K). The analysis reveals the co‐existence of the various H‐bonded rings. Remarkably, the central section of the β‐peptide 6 (containing a β^2,3‐amino‐acid residue of like‐configuration!) adopts a ten‐membered‐ring conformation for ca. 5% of the simulation time, while the central section of the β‐peptide C adopts a 14‐membered‐ring conformation for ca. 3% of the time, according to this computational analysis. Further experimental and theoretical work will be necessary to find out to which extent the components (H‐bonded rings) and the entire helical secondary structures of β‐peptides contribute to the observed Cotton effects.     

3,4‐[2,2‐Bis(methoxyethoxymethoxymethyl)propylenedithio]‐3′,4′‐(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene: a spiro‐substituted BEDT–TTF analogue

The crystal structure of the title compound [systematic name: 2‐(1,3‐dithiolo[4,5‐b][1,4]dithiin‐2‐ylidene)‐6,6‐bis(methoxyethoxymethoxymethyl)‐1,3‐dithiolo[4,5‐b][1,4]dithiepine], C₂₁H₃₀O₆S₈, a spiro‐substituted BEDT–TTF analogue [BEDT–TTF is bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene], has a strongly bent heterocyclic framework. The seven‐membered ring adopts a pseudo‐chair conformation with notably widened ring bond angles, especially at the methylene C atoms [119.49 (11) and 117.60 (11)°]. The axial side chain adopts an extended conformation, but the equatorial side chain curls back on itself and the O atom nearest the ring system is involved in three short contacts to H atoms (2.45–2.53 Å). The molecules pack in centrosymmetrically related pairs, which are isolated from each other by columns of the polyether side chains. This study emphasizes the ease of distortion of the neutral bis(propylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene ring structure, and how the need to accommodate side chains can easily override the tendency of these donor systems to form stacks in the crystalline state.