Teachers and didacticians: key stakeholders in the processes of developing mathematics teaching

This paper sets the scene for a special issue of ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education—by tracing key elements of the fields of teacher and didactician/teacher-educator learning related to the development of opportunities for learners of mathematics in classrooms. It starts from the perspective that joint activity of these two groups (teachers and didacticians), in creation of classroom mathematics, leads to learning for both. We trace development through key areas of research, looking at forms of knowledge of teachers and didacticians in mathematics; ways in which teachers or didacticians in mathematics develop their professional knowledge and skill; and the use of theoretical perspectives relating to studying these areas of development. Reflective practice emerges as a principal goal for effective development and is linked to teachers’ and didacticians’ engagement with inquiry and research. While neither reflection nor inquiry are developmental panaceas, we see collaborative critical inquiry between teachers and didacticians emerging as a significant force for teaching development. We include a summary of the papers of the special issue which offer a state of the art perspective on developmental practice.     

Developing collective capacity to improve mathematics instruction: Coaching as a lever for school-wide improvement

Mathematics coaching, as typically practiced in US schools tends to be responsive and individually focused work in which coaches respond to invitations from individual teachers to help them improve their teaching. But what does the work of coaching look like if it is organized instead to engage teachers collectively in service of school-wide improvement? This is the question we take up in this paper through examining the case of one school-based elementary mathematics coach whose work more closely aligned with emerging findings in the field of instructional improvement about the power of coaching for school-wide reform. The coach helped to dramatically transform a recent history of poor performance and deficit-oriented narratives pertaining to the school and its children. Through a fine-grain analysis, we illustrate the coach’s work implicated in supporting groups of teachers to come to mutual understanding around and further development of shared high-quality instructional practices. The components of coaching that help support collective capacity are discussed.     

Mathematics coaching and instructional reform: Individual and collective change

Mathematics coaching initiatives are being implemented in schools and districts across the country, guided by the notion that these initiatives will foster individual teacher’s learning and thereby support system-wide instructional improvement in mathematics. This paper explores the evolving roles that mathematics coaches played in a system-wide instructional improvement effort focused on elementary mathematics education in a medium-sized suburban school district. Using social network analysis and qualitative analysis of interviews, we argue that coaches facilitated teachers’ implementation of a new mathematics curriculum by acting as brokers, first as intermediaries between the district office and schools, then as catalysts for collective inquiry. Further, we show how coaches’ work was both enabled and constrained over time by various organizational dimensions at the school and district levels. Overall, our findings suggest that district and school leaders should think beyond the roles and responsibilities of individual coaches, and consider how to support coaches as participants in system-wide networks focused on continuous learning and instructional improvement.     

Reflections on the promise and complexity of mathematics coaching

If students are to develop mathematical proficiency, then mathematics teaching must both change and improve. In an effort to provide site-based professional development addressing the mathematical content and pedagogical demands that teachers encounter in reality of public schooling, many school districts are turning to elementary mathematics coaches. Knowledgeable coaches can have a significant positive impact on teachers, yet this study documents substantial variance in the amount of coaching delivered and in the nature of activity that coaches undertake within schools. Coaches are frequently responsive to the needs of individual teachers. If this support is primarily marked by shared teaching or provision of instructional materials, it may not transform either instruction or teacher knowledge. Similarly if coaches assume duties that primarily address an administrator’s needs, they will have less time to enhance a school’s mathematics program. Coaches need to engage teachers in fundamental dialogue about mathematical content, mathematical learning, and student understanding. It may be that this dialogue and the effectiveness of a coach’s work with individual teachers would benefit from a coach’s concurrent work with grade-level teams. When a coach leads a grade-level team through discussion of targeted goals and approaches, the coach may facilitate individual teacher learning while building collective learning. When coupled with the support of a principal, this partnership may foster instructional change across a school.     

Challenging Preservice Teachers' Mathematical Understanding: The Case of Division by Zero

Preservice elementary school teachers' fragmented understanding of mathematics is widely documented in the research literature. Their understanding of division by 0 is no exception. This article reports on two teacher education tasks and experiences designed to challenge and extend preservice teachers' understanding of division by 0. These tasks asked preservice teachers to investigate division by 0 in the context of responding to students' erroneous mathematical ideas and were respectively structured so that the question was investigated through discussion with peers and through independent investigation. Results revealed that preservice teachers gained new mathematical (what the answer is and why it is so) and pedagogical (how they might explain it to students) insights through both experiences. However, the quality of these insights were related to the participants' disposition to justify their thinking and (or) to investigate mathematics they did not understand. The study's results highlight the value of using teacher learning tasks that situate mathematical inquiry in teaching practice but also highlight the challenge for teacher educators to design experiences that help preservice teachers see the importance of, and develop the tools and inclination for, mathematical inquiry that is needed for teaching mathematics with understanding.     

Mathematics teacher educators’/researchers’ collaboration with teachers as a context for professional learning

This paper describes our joint activity as mathematics teacher educators and academic researchers in collaborating with both experienced and novice teachers in two contexts: an emergent community of inquiry into mathematics teaching and its development; and a research methods course, offered as part of a mathematics education Master’s program, aspiring to initiate participating teachers into research practice through inquiry. Adopting an Activity Theory (AT) perspective, we analyse our activity, identifying its nature and transformations that frame our professional learning. The results indicate that our professional learning is the outcome of a continuous process of becoming aware of our own activity and its transformation in relation to that of the teachers.     

Teachers’ gestures and speech in mathematics lessons: forging common ground by resolving trouble spots

This research focused on how teachers establish and maintain shared understanding with students during classroom mathematics instruction. We studied the micro-level interventions that teachers implement spontaneously as a lesson unfolds, which we call micro-interventions. In particular, we focused on teachers’ micro-interventions around trouble spots, defined as points during the lesson when students display lack of understanding. We investigated how teachers use gestures along with speech in responding to such trouble spots in a corpus of six middle-school mathematics lessons. Trouble spots were a regular occurrence in the lessons (M = 10.2 per lesson). We hypothesized that, in the face of trouble spots, teachers might increase their use of gestures in an effort to re-establish shared understanding with students. Thus, we predicted that teachers would gesture more in turns immediately following trouble spots than in turns immediately preceding trouble spots. This hypothesis was supported with quantitative analyses of teachers’ gesture frequency and gesture rates, and with qualitative analyses of representative cases. Thus, teachers use gestures adaptively in micro-interventions in order to foster common ground when instructional communication breaks down.     

Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: its structure and how it varies across six countries

Cross-national research studies such as the Program for International Student Assessment and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) have contributed much to our understandings regarding country differences in student achievement in mathematics, especially at the primary (elementary) and lower secondary (middle school) levels. TIMSS, especially, has demonstrated the central role that the concept of opportunity to learn plays in understanding cross-national differences in achievement Schmidt et al., (Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning  2001). The curricular expectations of a nation and the actual content exposure that is delivered to students by teachers were found to be among the most salient features of schooling related to academic performance. The other feature that emerges in these studies is the importance of the teacher. The professional competence of the teacher which includes substantive knowledge regarding formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy is suggested as being significant—not just in understanding cross-national differences but also in other studies as well (Hill et al. in Am Educ Res J 42(2):371–406, 2005). Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) is a small, six-country study that collected data on future lower secondary teachers in their last year of preparation. One of the findings noted in the first report of that study was that the opportunities future teachers experienced as part of their formal education varied across the six countries (Schmidt et al. in The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries, 2007). This variation in opportunity to learn (OTL) existed in course work related to formal mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy. It appears from these initial results that OTL not only is important in understanding K-12 student learning but it is also likely important in understanding the knowledge base of the teachers who teach them which then has the potential to influence student learning as well. This study using the same MT21 data examines in greater detail the configuration of the educational opportunities future teachers had during their teacher education in some 34 institutions across the six countries.     

Principal and coach as partners

This paper explores the roles and responsibilities of mathematics coaches and principals. It suggests that principals need to equilibrate power by treating the coach as a partner, even if the coach is subordinate in the educational hierarchy. It posits that coaching would benefit all parties if they worked together across roles to enhance the capacity of educators at every level in the school hierarchy—teacher, coach, principal—to design, analyze, and implement mathematics instruction that results in deeper student learning. It briefly describes the model of Content Coaching. It questions some of the prevailing norms of interaction among educators, and it offers coaching scenarios that demonstrate that the initial design and implementation of coaching initiatives can lead to resistance and misunderstanding of the power and benefits of coaching for all educators and administrators. It goes on to challenge some of our assumptions regarding potential barriers (e.g. confidentiality) in relationships among coaches, teachers, and principals, and suggests that teacher learning goals be public and collaboratively engaged. It posits that positional authority is not a particularly strong lever for improving teacher practice, particularly if the principal lacks facility or interest in mathematics. It argues that if we want to enhance mathematics education in this country (as evidenced by robust student understanding of mathematics and its application in the world), there is great power in working collaboratively and inclusively, using coaching to support educators at every level.     

Reflections on “Multiplication as Original Sin”: The implications of using a case to help preservice teachers understand invented algorithms

This article describes the use of a case report, Multiplication as original sin (Corwin, R. B. (1989). Multiplication as original sin. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 8, 223-225), as an assignment in a mathematics course for preservice elementary teachers. In this case study, Corwin described her experience as a 6th grader when she revealed an invented algorithm. Preservice teachers were asked to write reflections and describe why Corwin’s invented algorithm worked. The research purpose was: to learn about the preservice teachers’ understanding of Corwin’s invented multiplication algorithm (its validity); and, to identify thought-provoking issues raised by the preservice teachers. Rather than using mathematical properties to describe the validity of Corwin’s invented algorithm, a majority of them relied on procedural and memorized explanations. About 31% of the preservice teachers demonstrated some degree of conceptual understanding of mathematical properties. Preservice teachers also made personal connections to the case report, described Corwin using superlative adjectives, and were critical of her teacher.     

Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics

The terms inquiry-based learning and inquiry-based education have appeared with increasing frequency in educational policy and curriculum documents related to mathematics and science education over the past decade, indicating a major educational trend. We go back to the origin of inquiry as a pedagogical concept in the work of Dewey (e.g. 1916, 1938) to analyse and discuss its migration to science and mathematics education. For conceptualizing inquiry-based mathematics education (IBME) it is important to analyse how this concept resonates with already well-established theoretical frameworks in mathematics education. Six such frameworks are analysed from the perspective of inquiry: the problem-solving tradition, the theory of didactical situations, the realistic mathematics education programme, the mathematical modelling perspective, the anthropological theory of didactics, and the dialogical and critical approach to mathematics education. In an appendix these frameworks are illustrated with paradigmatic examples of teaching activities with inquiry elements. The paper is rounded off with a list of ten concerns for the development and implementation of IBME.     

Learning to teach high school mathematics: Patterns of growth in understanding right triangle trigonometry during lesson plan study

“Lesson plan study” (LPS), adapted from the Japanese Lesson Study method of professional development, is a sequence of activities designed to engage prospective teachers in broadening and deepening their understanding of school mathematics and teaching strategies. LPS occurs over 5 weeks on the same lesson topic and includes four opportunities to revisit one's own ideas and the ideas of others. In this paper, we describe one prospective teacher's growth in understanding right triangle trigonometry as she participated in LPS. This study is part of a much larger study investigating how prospective secondary teachers learn to teach mathematics within the context of LPS. Results of this study indicate that Image Saying, an activity for growth in understanding from the Pirie-Kieren model [Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 165-190], is critical to prospective teachers’ growth in understanding school mathematics. Multiple opportunities and contexts within which to share understanding of school mathematics led to significant growth in understanding of right triangle trigonometry which in turn led to growth in understanding of teaching strategies. That is, the results of this study indicate that growth in understanding school mathematics (what to teach) leads to growth in understanding teaching strategies (how to teach) as prospective teachers participate in LPS.     

Connecting Science and Mathematics: Using Inquiry Investigations to Learn About Data Collection,Analysis, and Display

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of providing preservice teachers the opportunity to collect real data in a science methods inquiry investigation and using the data, design data displays in their mathematics methods course. The research questions focused on how preservice teachers' understandings of data displays, research design, and the specific content addressed improved when they used these displays to attempt to communicate the data they had collected themselves in their inquiry investigations. The 46 preservice teachers were given questionnaires at the beginning and end of the courses, twelve were interviewed both pre and post, all written work pertaining to data displays and the inquiry investigations was collected, methods class sessions were audio and videotaped, and the final data display and science investigation projects were photocopied. The findings show that by creating and scrutinizing their data displays, the preservice teachers were able to recognize the limitations of their inquiry investigation design. Through working with data in the context of inquiry projects of their own design, the preservice teachers realized meaningful connections and commonalities that exist in mathematics and science while strengthening their knowledge and skills in both disciplines.     

Assessing views of coaching via a video-based tool

Mathematics coaches represent a unique group of didacticians, or individuals who work with practicing teachers. Twenty-eight mathematics coaches participated in this exploratory study, which used video viewing to examine the coach–teacher dynamic. To gather data about participants’ views of effective coaching practices, we developed the Video Assessment of Coaching instrument, which provided coaches with opportunities to express their views of effective practice and implementation. The participants expressed views of effective coaching that often did not align with those of coaching authors. The significance of this research lies in its efforts to document the views that mathematics coaches develop as practitioners, as an early step in the examination of the relationships between the views of coaches and coaches’ effectiveness in improving teacher practice, knowledge, and attitudes.     

Mathematics teachers’ views about the limited utility of real analysis: A transport model hypothesis

In the United States and elsewhere, prospective teachers of secondary mathematics are usually required to complete numerous advanced mathematics courses before obtaining certification. However, several research studies suggest that teachers’ experiences in these advanced mathematics courses have little influence on their pedagogical practice and efficacy. To understand this phenomenon, we presented 14 secondary mathematics teachers with four statements and proofs in real analysis that related to secondary content and asked the participants to discuss whether these proofs could inform their teaching of secondary mathematics. In analyzing participants’ remarks, we propose that many teachers view the utility of real analysis in secondary school mathematics teaching using a transport model, where the perceived importance of a real analysis explanation is dependent upon the teacher’s ability to transport that explanation directly into their instruction in a secondary mathematics classroom. Consequently, their perceived value of a real analysis course in their teacher preparation is inherently limited. We discuss implications of the transport model on secondary mathematics teacher education.     

The relationship of theory and practice in mathematics teacher professional development: an activity theory perspective

This paper describes certain interactions between the activity of “teaching” and the activity of “researching” in which the teachers participate in a 52-h professional development course aiming to introduce them to research in mathematics education as a tool for inquiry in their teaching. The teachers are involved in different research tasks such as: reading and presenting research papers; analyzing classroom dialogues and tasks; and designing, implementing, and evaluating collaboratively a classroom teaching intervention. From an activity theory (AT) perspective, and in particular Engeström’s (2001) third generation AT, distinguish two activity systems, the activity system of research and the activity system of teaching, to identify links that the participating teachers make. These links indicate the development of an inquiring stance to mathematics teaching and learning as a means of professional learning.     

Playing the believing game: Enhancing productive discourse and mathematical understanding

In mathematics classrooms, the practice of doubt pervades. However, Elbow (1986, 2006) contended that teachers must balance their practices of methodological doubt and methodological belief. The study reported here builds upon previous research which revealed the professor played the believing game (Elbow) and students were motivated to do mathematics. We addressed the question: How does a teacher (professor) play the believing game in a mathematics classroom? Videotapes, interviews, and field notes from an entire semester were collected and analyzed qualitatively. Although the professor was not consciously attempting to believe or doubt, we reveal when and under what circumstances they occurred. A temporal continuum of believing and doubting existed for the professor’s practice. Reserved believing and reserved doubting prevailed for the professor when she heard answers or comments she deemed incorrect and rich mathematical conversations transpired as she opened herself up to a deeper understanding of mathematics.     

From formal standards to everyday practice of mathematics learning

This paper uses the example of six Japanese teachers and their mathematics lessons to illustrate how clear, high standards for mathematics instruction are combined with teachers' holistic concern for students. We draw upon data from the Third International Math and Science Study Case Study Project in Japan that was designed to elucidate the context behind the high achievement of Japanese students. Using everyday examples of classroom practice, we illustrate both flexibility in teachers' approach to teaching and adherence to Monbusho's (Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture)Course of Study. Our purpose is to emphasize how flexibility and attention to individual needs by Japanese teachers combine with quality mathematics instruction based on the detailed Japanese curricula. Six teachers' characteristics and lessons (two teachers at each educational level—elementary, junior high, and high school) are described in order to show the variety of teachers who exist in Japan. These teachers use their understanding of theCourse of Study and are supported by their school environment to enhance their students' conceptual understanding of the fundamentals of mathematics. Characteristics of their teaching include: 1) involving the whole class in learning. 2) using extremely focused curriculum guidelines that expect mastery of concepts at each grade level, 3) thoroughly covering mathematics units in an organized and in-depth manner, 4) leading classes as facilitators or guides more often than as lecturers, and 5) focusing on problem solving with the primary goal of developing students' ability to reason, especially to reason inductively. The examples in this paper show how these methods develop in individal classrooms.     

Problematizing mathematics and its pedagogy through teacher engagement with history-focused and classroom situation-specific tasks

We explore the conjecture that engaging teachers with activities which feature mathematical practices from the past (history-focused tasks) and in today’s mathematics classrooms (mathtasks) can promote teachers’ problematizing of mathematics and its pedagogy. Here, we sample evidence of discursive shifts observed as twelve mathematics teachers engage with a set of problematizing activities (PA) – three rounds of history-focused and mathtask combinations – during a four–month postgraduate course. We trace how the commognitive conflicts orchestrated in the PA triggered changes in the teachers’ narratives about: mathematical objects (such as what a function is); how mathematical objects come to be (such as what led to the emergence of the function object); and, pedagogy (such as what value may lie in listening to students or in trialing innovative assessment practices). Our study explores a hitherto under-researched capacity of the commognitive framework to steer the design, evidence identification and impact evaluation of pedagogical interventions.     

Kindergarten teachers’ accounts of their developing mathematical practice

This study explores kindergarten teachers?? accounts of their developing mathematical practice in the context of their participation in a developmental research project. Observations and interviews were analysed to elaborate the accounts as regards orchestrating mathematical activities in the kindergarten. A co-learning agreement was established as collaboration between the kindergarten teachers and researchers. The study reveals that the kindergarten teachers argue that they have been empowered in developing an inquiry stance towards mathematics and mathematical activities. Taking an inquiry stance, they claim, has increased their awareness of the mathematics involved in activities, and enabled them to be more explicit when communicating mathematical ideas to children. An adjusted didactic triangle within the kindergarten setting is proposed based on these results.